Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Ann ...
Did you get info from the web site or from the magazine. I checked both, and
don't recall them saying not to contact them ... except after you've submitted
the pics. IOW, it's ok to get clarification and information about making the
submission, but after
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem
with previously published unless the photo appeared on a printed page
in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have
appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos are not
Hi Winston in Perth,
That's quite a good price for Aus.. I remember not too long ago there was an
MZ S with grip for AUD1100 and I thought that was a deal. If you do somehow
choose to abandon your new *ist to scrounge up enough for the MZ S though, I
think you'd want to skip that lens.. it's not
That Ebay auction closed at $1425 without a flash/wood grip. $1250 is
a real steal. Go for it before I put it up on ebay.
Let me know
Sunday, November 16, 2003, 1:06:08 PM, you wrote:
BD No takers yet on the 67II. Sweetening the deal a bit. Was $1300 +
BD shipping. Now $1250 - free
Hi Ryan,
I'm back in Jakarta already. I think MZ-S does not have enough feature
for me to abandon my *ist. The *ist is a capable camera with excellent
AF.
Now I'm back in Jakarta already!
Thanks
Winston
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
on 16.11.03 22:32, Bruce Dayton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Viewfinder is nice - seemed to be about on par with MZ-S from what I
remember
When I had *istD for tests, I compared both viewfinders head to head with
identical focal length. And althought the one in *istD is the best among
APS-sized
on 16.11.03 22:32, Bruce Dayton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D100 Pluses
Quieter AF
For me it is not that much quiter unless you use AF-S lenses :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Hello Herb,
Monday, November 17, 2003, 4:12:19 AM, you wrote:
pddrpn From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pddrpn Subject: From the Trenches
pddrpn snip
pddrpn snip
pddrpn total number of frames, but it represents nearly twice as many compositions.
pddrpn
pddrpn NiMH batteries really fare
on 16.11.03 22:32, Bruce Dayton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Viewfinder is nice - seemed to be about on par with MZ-S from what I
remember
When I had *istD for tests, I compared both viewfinders head to head with
identical focal length. And althought the one in *istD is the best among
On 16/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cotty posted (among many, many other things)
10. I'm not a brainy guy. I don't have a degree. I have 4 'O' Levels:
Maths, English, Drama, Photography. So I can add up, write it down,
pretend, and take a snap. That's it.
At least YOU passed O-Level
On 16/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Also, one thing I really dislike about the Canon interface is the wheel on
the back that can be used so many different ways depending on what else
you trip
(sets aperture when you trip the M switch), because it gets confusing.
IMO, it's one of the
On 16/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
There are no LX near the top of the list right
now, save a broken body with no finder.
One for you to keep an eye on:
Sorry was not meant to hit the list :-(
You published. Har!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
on 17.11.03 10:08, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, it's one of the strengths of the design. It is very quick in use.
It's all matter of habbits, I am sure I could get used to big wheel on EOSes
as fast as to small wheel on Z1P or *istD :-) BTW Cotty, has this wheel any
function in P or AV
on 17.11.03 10:05, John Francis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smaller total viewfinder area than the MZ-S, but greater magnification.
So with the same lens, objects look larger through the *ist-D viewfinder.
I meant the same focal length - of course in equivalent mm on *istD - AFAIR
it was ~50mm
Ever since I bought my first Pentax in 1980 I have wanted to have a
play with one of these shift lenses. Today one arrived in a box
complete with a case (very beaten up, but it's there), but no lens cap.
The glass on this is perfect and I would like to keep it that way, so
does anyone happen to
How about the build quality?
I really didn't liked the *ist. It feels like it would break in my hands;
even my MZ-6 is much better.
And I think MZ-S have a much better viewfinder, this is more important for
me than 11-points AF. That's what I don't like about my MZ-6... I almost
can't use MF on
Is there something special about the lens that would prevent using a
generic lens cap of the proper size?
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Leon Altoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi Alex,
It really depends on your priority. Even my MZ-3 is much much better in
term of build quality (made in Japan vs *ist made in Philippine), but I
could live with it. And both MZs ist are made for different purposes.
I need something compact, light, but sophisticated enough plus my wife
I do not have a cap but would like to know how googd is this lens. I
have a 35mmPC Nikkor adpted to pentax K that is really a gem.
EDUARDO AIGNER
www.eduardoaigner.com.br
Leon Altoff wrote:
Ever since I bought my first Pentax in 1980 I have wanted to have a
play with one of these shift lenses.
Hi!
To whom it may concern sigh. I've just tried to submit my current
PUG photo and this is what I saw thereafter:
-- start
Your submission has been registered.
You should receive an e-mail confirmation shortly.
SimpleMail.smtp.2 error '80020009'
ERROR in SendMail Transaction ERROR in
Nope. I looked at all the images of sun dogs, and it wasn't such a phenomenon.
These were stretched out, kind of ropy alto-cumulous clouds, lying
side by side, until stretched by upper level winds.
They looked like long strings of homemade sausages run over by a roller,
and then stretched out
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever since I bought my first Pentax in 1980 I have wanted to have a
play with one of these shift lenses. Today one arrived in a box
complete with a case (very beaten up, but it's there), but no lens cap.
The glass
Welcome aboard Andy.
You'll have to send some pictures
to the monthly Pentax Users Gallery.
I always enjoy seeing far away people places.
Regards, Bob S. near Chicago
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My name is Andy Chang from Taiwan. I bought my Pentax 5 years ago when I
was in UK. The choice of
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Winston wrote:
So I won't ask more from a $300 camera body.
How about pre-A compatibility? Can't be that hard or that expensive.
Kostas
Hi Boris,
I got the same thing when I submitted a couple of days ago.
Are we submitted?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:36 AM
Subject: PUG Submission
I picked up an *ist but like Alex I didn't like the build or feel of it very
much.. Especially coming from a 5n or a 3.. But that said, I do find the AF
on the 5n a bit wanting compared to the *ist. Doesn't do well on horizontals
or verticals which look easy? Don't know how deliberate that was in
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:17:47 -0300, Eduardo Aigner wrote:
I do not have a cap but would like to know how googd is this lens. I
have a 35mmPC Nikkor adpted to pentax K that is really a gem.
I'll let you know how well it performs. I'm taking it out on Wednesday
with my MZ-S and *istD. I'm not
Hi,
There was a Brit called Bob,
Nice bloke, he was no slob,
But things turned hard,
Started quoting the Bard,
And that is no easy job!
They say that the secret of great writing is rewriting. So having
improved on Shalespeare's paltry effort I have even (mirabile dictu!)
improved on mine:
Hmm, tough question. This isn't only happening with Pentax. I have an
old F90X Nikon that could not work with many new lenses, and I have a
dumb and slow F80 (real dumb!) which won't work with manual focus
lenses. Maybe Pentax sacrifices some compatibility to save some $$$ and
put newer features
Yep ...
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
say, didnt I take some of YOU on that roll of film
From Sept 9 till this morning Nov 17 my PDML folder accumulated 10,120 posts or 144
per day for 70 days. Just a curiosity.
My email server sent me a warning about my mailbox size. So I cleaned house
Mark Stringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hearty thanks to everyone who offered recipes and suggestions for the
making of beef stew. While I didn't use any one particular recipe, just
about everyone had a technique or ingredient that I used, and the result
seems to be quite good. After s-l-o-w-l-y cooking for about six or
seven hours,
UK based BW photographer, has died. Long-time user of Pentax cameras.
http://www.barry-thornton.co.uk/main.htm
Try articles to read from the menu on the left.
mike
Boris and Steve,
Your submissions has been received intact.
The component for sending the confirmation mail fails to do so.
Looks like it has problems connecting to the mailserver; I will raise the issue
with my SP.
Sorry about that.
Jostein
Quoting Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Boris,
Hi!
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:10:18 +0100
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boris and Steve,
Your submissions has been received intact.
The component for sending the confirmation mail fails to do so.
Looks like it has problems connecting to the mailserver; I will raise
the issue
with my SP.
Sorry
Thanks Jostein, and thanks for all your PUG efforts!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:10 AM
Subject: Re: PUG Submission problems
Boris and Steve,
Your submissions has
In other words, we have no life!
--- Mark Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: From Sept 9 till this morning Nov 17 my PDML
folder
accumulated 10,120 posts or 144 per day for 70 days.
Just a curiosity.
My email server sent me a warning about my mailbox
size. So I cleaned house
Mark
Hi,
Sunday, November 16, 2003, 10:51:52 PM, you wrote:
If it's publicly visible then it's published, like a written note about a
missing dog taped to a telegraph pole.
or pigeon:
http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/platformforart/images/shrigley/5.jpg
--
Cheers,
Bob
Yes, it says we are all just mumbling mammals caressing keyboards to
converse with inanimate objects in a desperate attempt to imitate life.
Regards,
Bob...
Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused. Men can go
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Of course, we can talk behind her back because she will delete the
thread. ;)
This is true. What are the chances that Ann will get a DSLR? I'll put
ten
Yankee Dollars on within 5 years.
I'll also bet a bottle of Wychwood's Fiddler's Elbow that
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
much sooner than I thought.
fanfare
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html
Mutley
Hi Mr Cotty,
Good job, now in all seriousness how difficult do you think it would be to
modify an EOS body to sport a permanent K mount? 300Ds
Some obvious points:
1) Many on this list are techie types, at least in term os enjoying
technology for its own sake. For these, the *istD is a wonderful thing
in itself, and we are experiencing new toy syndrome.
2) For anyone that has some understanding of chemical based
photography, it is
I really think they did. Canon pays attention to any potential
competitor, which is why they do so well. If you let anyone back in the
game, they can slowly encroach on you market share.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
To the gentleman who just joined the list with the *ist-D, tilt shift
lenses are not really necessary with the advent of photoshop. Although
you can achieve some extremes of depth of field with these lenses that
cannot be replicated in PS, if it is just distortion correction you are
after, you
I did consider it. I'd need an EOS body and a K body to practice on
(Bwahahahha) but hey this is all going to give me bad name...
I kinda like tinkering with things, who knows, I might give it a try
sometime.
BTW, Cotty, I emailed those guys asking how much it would cost to do one for
me.
Cotty wrote:
IMO, it's one of the strengths of the design. It is very quick in use.
If I had started with it, maybe. Starting with the K-1000's, then the ZX-5n's
dials and stuff, I just find the wheel confusing. I feel it's function
overloaded.
Marnie aka Doe Though I am beginning to get it
Winston,
Welcome to the list. I am really surprised by your statement about
your country having nothing to offer except Bali. I was very lucky
to have the opportunity to travel in your country about 5 years ago.
I traveled to Borneo, Sumatra, Bali and Java. All of the islands were
fascinating
mike wilson wrote:
Cotty wrote:
And as my letter commands top billing, what is my prize???
20 rolls of assorted Kodak film worth £110, apparently.
ROTFL.
Cheers,
Cotty
I'll give you £30, if you pay postage. 8-)
Oh! The irony! I look forward to reading this, I presume
Sorry, folks, but we have a bit of a problem figuring this one out.
It may take some time before I get the Confirmation Mail code up and running
again, so in the meantime I have simply turned it off.
If the upload is successful, you will still receive the usual webpage saying
so. That page is
graywolf wrote:
Ann, you should check with them about how they define publication. It could
differ a lot form generally held ideas about that.
In my opinion both the PUG and your Website would be considered publication as
they are widely available to the public, but the Smithsonian may not
Bob wrote:
First, this is not a flame. It's simply an observation of the losses
involved in using Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro or other software tool to
accomplish the functions provided by a shift lens. It should be
obvious that
after the fact correction of distortion necessarily involves
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cotty scribed:
Actually that last sentence was aimed at the editor, but he's put it in
anyway lest the mag get inundated with irate Belinkovites ;-)
LOL Funny to see that here at this time, as I was just going through some
filters that I modified
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Well, now you have no excuse for not using the MX (grin).
You're kidding! The rest of my vultures have pounced on it even before
it's arrived! I might just try one roll for old-time's sake
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'll also bet a bottle of Wychwood's Fiddler's Elbow that she's
already
reading this thread - curiosity will get the better of her, and even
though '*ist D' is in the subject line, so
is her name, and she's an NY Girl...
Let's slowly
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
And as my letter commands top billing, what is my prize???
20 rolls of assorted Kodak film worth £110, apparently.
ROTFL.
Cheers,
Cotty
I'll give you £30, if you pay postage. 8-)
LOL. Sixty!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
I'll agree to this. The one niche really open to Pentax is the 645 style cameras,
regardless of sensor size.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/16/03 03:03PM
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that Pentax just can't even begin to compete with Canon
anymore. Because of the sheer amount of
On 17 Nov 2003 at 12:34, graywolf wrote:
Ann, you should check with them about how they define publication. It could
differ a lot form generally held ideas about that.
In my opinion both the PUG and your Website would be considered publication as
they are widely available to the public, but
On 17 Nov 2003 at 18:08, Cotty wrote:
Or a DREMMEL! Bwahahahahahahahahaha
Oh my god, you didn't buy a Dremel did you?
Will anything be safe in the Cotty household? :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wuthrich.cc/AF280T.pdf
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 22:27, Ian bromehead wrote:
My AF280T didn't come with a manual, so does anyone know where I can =
pick one up, although it isn't very sophisticated compared to more
modern units, it does have quite a few switchable modes that I'm
Spider web, fragile? It was used to produce excellent bullet-proof vests
and body armor. Though getting it in large quantities has hampered
commercial production, somewhat. I understand that we have to make do
with a poor substitute. Kevlar.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
and 130
I got my *ist-D over a week ago, but between having to log in some serious
hours getting ready for an art fair later this week, and the utterly crappy
/ gloomy weather, I haven't really had the time to do much with it. I
_have_ managed to shoot about 900 images though - my last surviving cat is
Len Paris wrote:
Spider web, fragile? It was used to produce excellent bullet-proof vests
and body armor.
By whom? When? Where?
keith whaley
Though getting it in large quantities has hampered
commercial production, somewhat. I understand that we have to make do
with a poor substitute.
This lens cap is still available new, and it is relatively cheap (just 8
Euros), although it is metal. It is the same cap as the cap for the
A15/f3.5. Check whether your photo store can order it for you. Mine did
so when I asked for it (Pentax item number 006997).
Arnold
Leon Altoff schrieb:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip nice stuff about the *istD
I've very happy with it with the A*200mm macro.
I really gotta get me one of these (or the FA* EDIF 200/4 macro) Why do
they have to be so expensive? Why? WHY?
Christian
Geoff,
I was kidding of course. But nowadays it's not really comfortable to
make such a trip outside Java island and Bali. Safety and security are
the main concern. Lombok is ok, the closest to Bali. We have magnificent
views in some places. Getting there is another story. Some of the most
A fellow I work with has a new, very capable, Olympus microscope that
can take cameras. It would be very convenient to attach an *ist D to it,
from which he could transfer images quickly to his pc. Other than
needing to experiment on exposure, is there any reason why this
shouldn't be
If the image (of the building or whatever) is only x millimeters in width at
the top of the film frame due to convergence, it's only x millimeters it
contains only the information that can be transferred to x millimeters of
film width. Expanding by any method post image capture, including
I know it's a rare occurance, but I actually agree with Cotty on this one.
vbg
I mean, there's published, and there's ~published~, if ya know what I mean.
Geez, if you take their rules to letter, then I guess anyone who has posted
pics on Photo.net and such on-line galleries has published,
What do they call that? Reductio ad absurdum? (My latin's real bad - come
to think of it, so's my English). Seems to me that the very example of
published that you provide, Rob, proves the point that a literal
definition of the word simply couldn't apply for the Smithsonian's purposes.
Hi,
Monday, November 17, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, you wrote:
Spider web, fragile? It was used to produce excellent bullet-proof vests
and body armor.
By whom? When? Where?
there was a turf war in Pixieland recently, fighting for control of
the mushroom supply. The redcaps wrapped themselves in
Hi,
Just before I crawl back under my rock, I wanted to say that I misread the
rules. I thought they prohibited published photographers from submitting,
but, upon more careful re-reading, I see that it's the actual submitted
photos that can't be previously published.
Ah well, that'll learn
Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
Monday, November 17, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, you wrote:
Spider web, fragile? It was used to produce excellent bullet-proof vests
and body armor.
By whom? When? Where?
there was a turf war in Pixieland recently, fighting for control of
the mushroom supply.
You're right. After I take 36 (well, actually, about 38, 'cause I can
stretch film and get those extra couple of frames out of every roll) shots,
I rewind the film into the cannister, and take it to my lab. I then say to
the owner, Hey, Rob, develop this with contacts, and I'll be back in a
There are lots of other examples of publishing that shouldn't keep
someone
out of the contest: family newsletters that some put in Christmas cards,
monthly church newsletters, that sort of thing. And, let's face it, there
are some things that surely go away with the passage of time. If one
Rob Studdert wrote:
missing dog taped to a telegraph pole.
Telegraph pole?!?!? Don't ya'll use telephones down there?!?! r, d, g
--
Gary
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.197 / Virus Database: 261.1.0 - Release Date:
Nah, I just made up all that stuff about going to high school. vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, did they have high schools back then?
Bill
This weekend I was taking a picture of a nice scene with my *ist D and my
F35-135 3.5-4.5 and turned my back to the tripod for a second to find my
kids or something. When I looked again it was about six inches from
smacking the ground, lens-first. Nothing I could do but watch in shock and
On 16 Nov 2003 at 21:03, Pål Jensen wrote:
Not very likely as Pentax according to the latest rumors already have a fully
working full frame DSLR based on the 645 system. They are waiting for the price
to come down. Apparently this price point is $6000; not too bad for a full frame
6 X 4,5
On 17 Nov 2003 at 12:36, Cameron Hood wrote:
You can overcome this by over-scanning (increase dpi) so you have lots
available to make the correction. I have done many interior and
architectural shoots and it has not been a problem for me. The only
thing you can't do in photoshop is to use
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Smart *ist D Question
A fellow I work with has a new, very capable, Olympus microscope that
can take cameras. It would be very convenient to attach an *ist D to it,
from which he could transfer images quickly to his pc. Other
Huh? Pentax and German Girls?
Is Adelheid somehow connected with Bob's fractured Shakespeare?
Now I'm really confused! vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: mike wilson [EMAIL
I finally tried the 18-35 on a film camera this morning.
I used a Program Plus.
That little sucker is actually a decent optic, though it's a slow one.
Not a lot of fall off in the corners, and it stays straight and sharp to the
edges.
Not having an aperture ring is a bit of a bust, as it does
Hi gang ...
A few days ago John and I got together and made a few pics with his istD.
I had time to look at them in PS, and compare them to pics of the same
subjects made from a little Sony PS. John, the JPEGs from the istD that I
have here are the WORST! I have ever encountered.
Cotty,
In another thread, in your most self-deprecatory tone, you tell us that
you're not brainy, and that you have no degree.
Then you use (if I count correctly) 16 letter words. Hmmm...
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it
Bob, I'll file that line as a quote.. Mumbling mammals! Classic
:)
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: PDML factoid
Yes, it says we are all just mumbling mammals caressing keyboards
Hi!
J When receiving an error from the file mailer.inc, it means you don't get a
J mail. :-)
J Jostein
J -
J Pictures at: http://oksne.net
J -
Only a person who either read the program/script that does the job or
wrote it can say such a
Jostein wrote:
But please keep the submissions coming. So far, the number of
contributions is minuscule compared to the current gallery. Surely you
have a picture of some clouds somewhere!
Actually thanks for the reminder. I totally forgot about the approaching
deadline.
Pity I don't have
Those IR shots are inspiring. I've gotta try one of those filters on my
*istD. Did you use a ring flash for the bug or just a regular flash?
I agree with you that the instant feeback is one of the greatest things
that digital has to offer. I played with the lighting setup for an ebay
sale
Hi!
Sorry to hear that. At least camera which seems to be much expensive
is intact...
What is NFG, if you don't mind telling?
[sigh]
Boris
===8==Original message text===
cbn This weekend I was taking a picture of a nice scene with my *ist D and my
cbn F35-135 3.5-4.5
What is the theme for December? Couldn't find it at the PUG site
Not sure what it means in Cory's neck of the woods, but in the upper
mid-west it means no f*g good
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: something dumb I did
Condolences.. I know the
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Smart *ist D Question
A fellow I work with has a new, very capable, Olympus microscope that
can take cameras. It would be very convenient to attach an *ist D to
it,
from which he could transfer images quickly to his pc.
Clouds.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:59 PM
Subject: December PUG Submission
What is the theme for December? Couldn't find it at the PUG site
on 11/13/03 6:44 PM, John Francis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis wrote:
somewhat from chromatic aberration, especially in the corners.
On my monitor all the bright white edges have the blue CA.
Even on the back dark edge of the geese' wings.
Could this be the lenses used? I
http://www.forbes.com/2003/11/17/1117pentaxpinnacor.html
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Stan,
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:31:42 -0600, Stan Halpin wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/bird on wire.jpg
for others with the 300mm alone, see
http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/red twig.jpg and
http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/cardinal.jpg
Spaces aren't legal in a URL. They need
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:00:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On unstable ground, always keep a hand on your gear.
Geez, Cory, I'm sorry to hear that. But think, it could've been the
borrowed FA* 200/2.8 :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Does this mean we share holders will be getting free
dvd players :D
either way it is GREAT news!
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/11/17/1117pentaxpinnacor.html
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
on 11/17/03 11:30 AM, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now those of you that have met me know that I'm a modest chap (!) and
don't like banging my own drum. But for those who won't see the magazine:
...
modest?
... proper digital editing techniques, and not this cheap and chintzy
attempt
frank theriault wrote:ght.
(snip, snip, snip)
I continue to think that the Smithsonian really shouldn't care if someone,
especially the lovely Ann, published a submitted photo on PUG. Now, if
she had it published in National Geographic, that might be different. I
guess that what I'm
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
