I think you misinterpreted my message. As technologies have evolved, even
cheap consumer products can be sophisticated, just built cheaply (cut
corners you can say). No doubt Pentax shows no sign of being able to compete
with the very top end sector like 1v/1D etc. However, Pentax still have
Perhaps so.
But it seems to me Pentax can't really compete in the enthuisast segment
either. Canon 10D vs. Pentax *ist D. Same price range, same kind of buyers.
Canon winns this segment as well and has faster AF speed and better image
quality, doesn't it?
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi
a very, very sweet shoot Wendy!
What program did you use for the frames?
thanks for sharing it...
Markus
http://www.pbase.com/image/29213363
Wendy ;-)
I thought it was the 20-35/4.
stan
On Jun 30, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
i thought it was the FA* 200/4 ED Macro in 2001 or 2002.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: Rumors
Very true. However, it has much to do with lens technologies I believe. In
fact, Canon is way ahead of everyone else at the moment.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Perhaps so.
But it seems to me Pentax can't really compete in the enthuisast segment
either. Canon 10D vs. Pentax *ist D.
Hi,
Before you can make your own decisions you have to know what you want. That is
asking a lot from some people.
oh, I don't know. My boss makes an awful lot of decisions without
having the faintest idea what he wants.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Jens Bladt a écrit :
Merci Michel.
Intersting to see a photograph of this ancient one!
Perhaps I have got it all wrong?
I was refering to the camrea - Pentax Spotmatic, which I believe was
announced to have an on-board spot meterering facility - like most modern
SLRs. I believe the prototype
on 01.07.04 8:42, Stan Halpin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was the 20-35/4.
The newest FA lens is FA 28-90/3.5-5.6 released as a part of MZ-6 kit in
2001 or eventually FA 28-105/3.2-4.5 which apeeared in the same year.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
on 30.06.04 22:52, Jens Bladt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.dpreview.com states as qouted below, that the AF is rather slow, you
must push down the biult-in flash maunally (AF assist) before takeing the
picture, if yoy don't want ti use flash light, and that the AF assist light
may require
I found these on different places on the internet:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/c219377.html
(if not ready - wait for fotopic.net approval)
Canon 10D may taker better pictures, but Pentax may use very pretty modeles
:-).
This may not be quite leagal, so I'll delete these shortly...
Cheers
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
Shel
Antonio
du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
gäll!
Markus
Ah, ¡justo ayer estaba mirando un Rollieflex 2.8F en eBay! No se si
Es una forma que siempre me
ha gustado, y ahora mas.
Saludos,
Antonio
Sylwester Pietrzyk a écrit :
on 30.06.04 22:52, Jens Bladt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.dpreview.com states as qouted below, that the AF is rather slow, you
must push down the biult-in flash maunally (AF assist) before takeing the
picture, if yoy don't want ti use flash light, and that the
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 8:12:05 AM, Shel wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
that's a very enjoyable photo. It has a nice ambiguity about the way
the person is walking. Depending on how you look at it, the person
could be walking up into the
on 01.07.04 9:24, Michel Carrère-Gée at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On low light, force center sensor only, it's the more sensitive.
I do it and despite this it was 2x slower than MZ-S and my friend's EOS 10D
(althought 10D seems to be not as accurate as *istD).
--
Pozdrowienia
Sylwek
Rollei did that with the first series of the later world-famous Rollei 35: To
acknowledge the contribution of the suppliers, these cameras had the words
Rollei-Gossen-Compur-Zeiss engraved on the rear. Those cameras are now very
rare and valuable for collectors.
Sven
Zitat von Keith Whaley
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 8:22:38 PM, Raimo wrote:
RK If adjusting exposure is PITA why do you use manual camera in the first
RK place? Adjustment can be done with shutter or aperture or both. And exposure
RK readings change when zooming even if you use constant apeture zooms. Try it
RK so you´ll
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Markus Maurer wrote:
Antonio
du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
gäll!
Markus
Ah, ¡justo ayer estaba mirando un Rollieflex 2.8F en eBay! No se si
Es una forma que siempre me
ha gustado, y ahora mas.
Saludos,
Antonio
Mmm I thought it was more like Minolta bought Konica or at least a 1:1
merger.
So Konica bought them ? Huh... Didn't Konica was still any big at all..
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 12:48
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay. The Canon shot is warmer, the Pentax shot cooler.
In my parlance, and assuming the images were not messed with, the white
balance was different between them.
I would assume both cameras allow a choice in white balance... so it
seems obvious the settings were different between both of them.
I've been on the list for a several days now.
I joined mainly to see what people far more experienced than I thought of
the *ist D.
I was truly surprised to see that film is being replaced by digital at such
a rapid rate.
I'm still buying, repairing, selling AND shooting ME Supers, Super A's and
AC the same when the lenses are extended to closest focus. But geez, I must be
AC stupid to think that way, I know.
Oh, Alan, don't get so worked up ;-)
Isn't this all just fun? Personally, I have more lively issues than
determining if the Nikon and Tamron lenses are the same or not, or how
much
G'day Cotty, Jens, Shel, rg, Tom, Peter, Boris
Thanks for the comments - much appreciated.
There was undoubetedly an element of luck in this - I quite liked the way the
mist caused a sort of painted effect to the right of the island. And the
monochrome effect was just what I was looking for.
Now that's something beatutiful! BW in its finest. Another one from
your fine archive, or a new one?
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
Boris said!
Thanks for sharing Dave. My knowledge about IR photography is zilch. I
only know that such thing exists.
However, the branches on the right cross into the building. They are on
the foreground so it looks (to me at least) that they overcome
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med norske bokstaver?
DagT
Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Markus Maurer wrote:
Antonio
du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
gäll!
Markus
Ah,
Looks just fine to me :-)
I have received a total of 4 messages from you to the list.
Antti-Pekka
---
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy, Turku Finland
Gsm: +358-500-789 753
www.computec.fi * www.estera.fi
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Bob,
A bullet from a .22-250 rifle?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Space Ship One
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 1:53:46 AM, Peter wrote:
The
What's a snicket?
All I know about is Lemony Snicket. That doesn't seem to match... :-(
keith whaley
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 8:12:05 AM, Shel wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
that's a very enjoyable photo. It has a nice ambiguity
Many of my shots are still life or macros, so I use MF a lot. I
actually keep a A50 1.5 lens on the camera since I life the feel of the
AF better. I do use AF for moving targets, however, since it does
better than I do. I always use only the central sensor for most stuff,
although I will
I just got a little touchy lately... :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Oh, Alan, don't get so worked up ;-)
Isn't this all just fun? Personally, I have more lively issues than
determining if the Nikon and Tamron lenses are the same or not, or how
much do they differ, practically or
Hi!
Who (or what) is WES? Folks, have mercy, not everyone knows all the
tastes of letter soup.
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
This is really marvelous. Among your serious pieces, I think this one
is the very best this far. At least to me.
What is
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
Shel
Shel,
Perfect!! Stunning photograph! Possibly more to
follow once I pick my jaw up off the floor. vbg
cheers,
frank
=
The optimist thinks this is the best
This is the second message I've got from you on this list in a short time..
keith whaley
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don
This seems to be a far better solution.
Those are the kind of light/flash bulbs I was refereing to earlier. The
output is not huge, though - app. GN30 in European (metric) terms - which
makes the output almost equal to an ordenary camera flash gun like the
Pentax AF280T, which I believe is GN28
G'day,
Haven't posted a PAW for a while, so here's a PESO, just wondering what
people think. I'm sort of in two minds about the image, but it's the
result of a little project, thought posting it was better than nothing
at all.
So, without further ado, I give you Mushroom cloud.
Make that an A50 1.7. ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2004 8:02:02 AM
Many of my shots are still life or macros, so I use MF a lot. I
actually keep a A50 1.5 lens on the camera since I life the feel of
the
AF better. I do use AF for moving targets, however, since it does
better than I do. I
I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.
BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???
Thanks
Don
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:21 AM
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/shedrow.jpg
Its not uncommon,if you don't own your own trailer,to spend many hours at a horse show
than you
need to.
This family was up at 4am to ready their horse,and trailer to this show via the farm
Whan we are at it, what about the meaning of PESO ?
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 14:40
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: OT: Test?
I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs Digital.
Picture a Week. Like the old photo clubs ...
On 1 Jul 2004, at 14:39, Don Sanderson wrote:
I've been trying to send one asking some questions about Film vs
Digital.
Doesn't seem to want to work.
I'll get it figured out eventually.
BTW: PAW = Photographer At Work???
Thanks
Don
-Original
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
norske bokstaver?
De norska tecknen ser helt okej ut härifrån, men jag är kanske partisk :-)
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
PESO = Photo Every So Often (-:
Can't remember who coined it, but it works for me (-:
David
Thibs wrote:
Whan we are at it, what about the meaning of PESO ?
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 14:40
À : [EMAIL
I think the outer tip of a long wip may break the sound barrier, but it may be even
earlier.
DagT
Fra: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bob,
A bullet from a .22-250 rifle?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 2:01:33 PM, Alan wrote:
AC I just got a little touchy lately... :-)
Sorry for that :) I meant no harm.
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
On 1 Jul 2004 at 6:12, Don Sanderson wrote:
To extract the two questions:
1.) Can digital be expected to be ready to shoot when I need it to?
I can't offer responses relating to PS digicams but most DSLRs have a small
power on delay but once on/awake have quite a short shutter lag, that is
On 1 Jul 2004 at 0:54, Verge Scott wrote:
So Any ideas guys? I really want to get this fixed
ASAP.
Got ideas but no practical experience with K lenses.
If there are 3 screws as previously mentioned, what
do I do loosen them and focus it a bit past infinity
and then tighten them down
Nope, the bullet from a .50 caliber machine gun.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Space Ship One
Hi Bob,
A bullet from a .22-250 rifle?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach,
What was the 1st man-made object to break the sound barrier?
--
Cheers,
Bob
I should have read the whole post before responding .50 caliber machine gun
bullet. The first man-made object to break the sound barrier would
probably be either a round ball from a muzzle loading rifle,
Don Sanderson asked:
I also observed that the 5050 does a very poor job of dealing with high
contrast
situations. Is this a characteristic of digital?
Speaking of DSLR's, Canon, Nikon and Pentax are somewhere between slide and
negative. For some reason, the Fujifilm S2 Pro (old honeycomb
William Robb wrote:
I have used the Pentax 6x7 800mm f/4 lens once.
There is significant distance from the tripod socket to the shutter,
hence the problem with shutter induced vibration.
Using two tripods is a good way to tame the problem.
You're supposed to carry a couple sandbags
Hi,
It's a new photo, made earlier this month at the San Francisco Museum of
Modern Art. Glad you liked it. I'm still not satisfied with the result
... needs a little more tweaking.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that's something beatutiful! BW in
I use AF when i use the 18-35 lens because the manual focus ring blows. that said, i
don't use that lens very often. Also i'm experimenting with AF for motorsports and
other action. I just want to see what it's capable of. Let's say 10% of the time
I'll use AF.
Christian
-Original
Jjowlkj kljo know sanxz, oiuer noikt lkje?
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
norske bokstaver?
De norska tecknen ser helt okej ut härifrån, men jag är kanske partisk :-)
anders
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
Because today good cameras are based on very sophisticated technology -
AF-systems, Data Processing, Imaging-/Sensor Technology - as well as high
quality lens design/lens making. Pentax may survive as a lens maker - if it
can find corporate lens buyers. As
Hi Bob ...
Not familiar with Snicket, but I understand your reference to the
McCullin photo.
WES, as you may know, has been a strong influence for me. When working on
this pic I was reminded of Walk to Paradise Garden but also of his famous
shot of the fellow walking amongst the railroad
That is not a decision, that is a whim. It is what some people consider a proof
of their power, You will accede to my every (idiotic) whim! Strangely the less
you are paid, the more likely you are to have to put up with that kind of BS.
--
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Before you can make your own
You have this in the file:
HEADTITLEAscension - Homage to WES/TITLE/HEAD
On Thursday 01 July 2004 16:13, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
FJW Hi Bob ...
FJW
FJW Where did you come up with Ascension? I was thinking of using that as a
FJW working title and then thought better of it. Did I mention that
Herb wrote:
which means that both Nikon and Pentax are fully at the mercy of some 3rd
party vendor's ability to develop a good sensor. Canon isn't. it takes deep
pockets to play in the DSLR game, as Leica is finding out, and for a company
that is on as thin a financial base as Leica, it may
Alan:
(something that Nikon and Canon arguably hasn't);
We love Pentax, but where did that come from?
eg. good quality lenses and medium format.
Since Canon Nikon do not produce 120, it is a pointless arguement. We can only
compare what they produced. Besides, Nikon have large format
Herb wrote:
which means that both Nikon and Pentax are fully at the mercy of some 3rd
party vendor's ability to develop a good sensor
REPLY:
Virtually everything within a camera is at the mercy of numerous 3rd party vendors.
Pentax don't make plastic, metal or electronic parts. Not even
It looks a bit dark on my semi calibrated monitor. It looks good when I
increase brightness.
I like the composition when I do that.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/homage.html
Work in Progress
Shel
I don't quite 'get' walking down either.
However, there are two possibilities which I can picture:
Photog at top of stairs looking down at someone at the bottom of the
stairs about to step onto them.
Or
Photog at the bottom of the stairs looking up at someone who has almost
reached the top.
Thanks Frantisek. I'll keep looking. In the meantime, did you take a
look at the other setup that I mentioned, which is not hot? Take a look
here:
http://tinyurl.com/2urz2
This looks like it could handle much of what she is planning on selling,
without a huge expense.
rg
Frantisek Vlcek
No, not defeatism. Not nothing left to invent. Just some things can't
be made better based on current understanding
of physical laws.
A.) The Whip.
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 1:53:46 AM, Peter wrote:
The Bell X-1 was based on the shape of a supersonic bullet. It was used
Pentax choses prettier models for the advertisements?
Keith Whaley wrote:
Okay. The Canon shot is warmer, the Pentax shot cooler.
In my parlance, and assuming the images were not messed with, the
white balance was different between them.
I would assume both cameras allow a choice in white
This one did, I guess you pass.
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've sent several posts now, they don't seem to get through.
Don
It's supposed to be dark. Since I don't know what you're looking at, I
can't comment. There are some subtleties that seem to get lost when viewed
in my browser that are obvious (to my eyes) when the pic is viewed in
Photoshop, where it was edited. IrfanView provides a flatter image. Too
many
Does anyone have an extra front grip for the Pentax P5/P50 camera?
It's removable like the one on the Super Program/Super A, but I
believe it's a different grip.
Joe
--
Joe Wilensky
Staff Writer
Communication and Marketing Services
1150 Comstock Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-2601
Heck, most of us would choose the prettier girl as being the better photo
regardless of anything else.
It's like comparing apples and oranges and reaching the conclusion that
apples would make a better apple pie ingredient than oranges. One needs to
compare kinds of apples.
Tom C.
From:
You are right of course, Peter.
I just thought it was funny, that two very similar photographs could be
found on the internet.
The Canon shot was downloaded from www.dpreview.com earlier today.
The Pentax shot came from an early announcement for the brand new Pentax
*ist D.
I believe it came from
I like this one a lot. Incredibly simple and moody. The title is good
as well.
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:21:25 +0100, Bob W wrote:
What was the 1st man-made object to break the sound barrier?
I'd guess that it was some sort of bullet or cannon projectile.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Hi!
You are missing it completely, Boris.
Oh well. I am allowed to do so, am I not? g
Nice to know your wife's participating in our little group. What's
her name?
Julia.
Boris
If they did then they should just buy a full frame 35mm digital system.
(Or am I the only one who sees the advantages in this).
Jeff Post wrote:
This is where I disagree. It seems 35mm photographers have accepted
the 1.6 crop sensor (although 1.3 would be nicer). Do you not think
645 users
It is.
They are not quite interchangeable. The mounting hole at the backside of the
grips have different sizes, and the Super A grip is more curved, on the back
side. I only have the two gripos I need. Some Pentax repair guy somewhere
might have one
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done by eye using the built in Photoshop calibration tool. In other
words I have no Idea how accurate it really is.
That said on my monitor it's too dark and loses the detail of the
railings, (etc.), until I turn the brightness control to MAX.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's supposed to be dark.
These are just sweet. Though the focus in the second is so noticeably
off that it's a distraction.
Gonz wrote:
Since there have been several People + Dog PAWs recently, I thought
I would add to the chorus.
http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1529web.jpg
Here is another one from the same
A standard black powder charge in a muzzle loading rifle or musket of 250
years ago could have a muzzle velocity of up to Mach 2, though most were
about Mach 1.5. Percussion revolvers (.45 cal., 8 barrel) of the U.S. civil
war had a muzzle velocity of around Mach 1 (1100 - 1200 fps). All the
Detail in the railings are supposed to be lost. Just highlights should be
visible. Sounds like you're looking for more than was intended to be shown.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That said on my monitor it's too dark and loses the detail of the
But, of course, not seeing what you see makes it difficult for any
meaningful dialogue on the matter. However, if you have to turn your
monitor brightness all the way up, you're either seeing more than was
intended, as noted earlier, or your calibration is way off.
Shel
[Original Message]
http://www.bluehorizon3d.com/explanation.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW - Homage to WES
I don't quite 'get' walking down either.
However, there are two possibilities
One is the Dpreview model (its actually Joanna, Phils wife)taken by an
amateur photographer (Phil, 10D) and the other is a professional model
taken by a professional photgrapher hired by Pentax or working for
Pentax. So its probably not a fair comparison.
rg
Jens Bladt wrote:
Better link:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Looked at it several more times. Maybe I'm too close to it, but I cannot
see this figure walking down. The bend of the body, which is obvious to
me, clearly indicates upward. I wonder what other people see.
Upward, definitely.
keith
Shel
Will you allow them to have made their own nameplates?
How about assembly?
Let's see, what IS it Pentax does?
keith
Pål Jensen wrote:
Herb wrote:
which means that both Nikon and Pentax are fully at the mercy of some 3rd
party vendor's ability to develop a good sensor
REPLY:
Virtually everything
Gonz wrote:
One is the Dpreview model (its actually Joanna, Phils wife) taken by an
amateur photographer (Phil, 10D) and the other is a professional model
taken by a professional photgrapher hired by Pentax or working for
Pentax. So its probably not a fair comparison.
Of course it's not a
Probably a bull whip!
rg
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 1:53:46 AM, Peter wrote:
The Bell X-1 was based on the shape of a supersonic bullet. It was used
because it was simple and the engineers knew
it would travel faster than sound. Sometimes a technology can't be
improved upon.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:05:51 +0800, Shaun Canning wrote:
I was just thinking of just shipping you off to Siberia for a while... :-D
Well, then, that's all right. I've always wanted to vacation in
Siberia.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Peter J. Alling offered for our consideration:
Canon only wins in image quality if you're looking for over sharpened
Kodak Max 400 type output.
Having played with both Canon and Pentax DSLRs in the same price range I
can't objectively say that
Canon has any obvious advantage over Pentax
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:L
Norm Baugher wrote:
Jjowlkj kljo know sanxz, oiuer noikt lkje?
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
norske bokstaver?
Rob Studdert wrote:
Obtaining similar performance to a film
system with 250 exposure back, a fast MD and pellicle mirror is some while away
in digiland.
True. But the new Nikon D70 will capture 144 JPEGs at three frames/second.
That's probably good
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who can afford a DSLR can probably afford IS/USM lenses, too.
Not me.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Pentax doesn't make glass but they are still owned by Asahi aren't they ?
And as far as I know Asahi is quite a manufacturer of glass or did I miss
something ?
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 16:44
À : [EMAIL
Ah, but for the cost of a D70 you can pick up a nice Rollei 6008i with
2.5fps SH, and you can add a digital back to it later. The best of both
worlds...
A.
On 1 Jul 2004, at 19:16, John Francis wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
Obtaining similar performance to a
I was going to write C'mon what did he ate when I read the end of the last
sentence LOL
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2004 16:50
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: What % AF? (was Af speed of the *ist D)
From: Rob
The new link is (reposted instead of waiting for approval - fotopic.net only
manually checks a sertain precentage):
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p5576450.html
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. Alling
Metering sucks too... some pictures don't come out quite right. Too dark,
too light.
Tom C.
From: Thibs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: What % AF? (was Af speed of the *ist D)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:17:29 +0200
I was going to write C'mon
Peter Alling wrote:
The problem is that most people
aren't particularly rational, (and Pentax
hasn't the wit to market and advertise it's advantages).
In ancient times Pentax made a Pentax Calender showing remarkably
excellent photographs.
Made from 6x7 negs, I suppose.
Pentax really should
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jim Apilado wrote:
Thanks for these shots. What an awesome building. The Boeing 307
Stratoliner, I believe, crashed into Elliott Bay in Seattle, WA a couple of
years ago. It had been restored and was flying back to D.C. They were able
to repair the restoration and flew
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
