Very cool!
On Apr 11, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Wow, another totally cool shot!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, April 11, 2010, 12:04:23 PM, you wrote:
D http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
D K20D, DA*16-50 @50mm, 1/90s, f/4.5, ISO200
D DagT
D
Larry Colen wrote
Sent: 12 April 2010 01:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Exhibit details
I'm trying to tie up the final details for the show.
I don't understand how the pricing of the art works as there is both
an asked for and a minimum price on the form. Is there some sort
While she didn't dance in them Cat showed up at Friday Night Blues in
a rockin' pair of boots.
Shot in the lobby, with poor light, worse background and limited time:
K-x at ISO 6400 and some severe cropping:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4513953692/in/set-72157623712148473/
--
Larry
On 12/4/10, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've taken a pragmatic approach. I don't hold out a lot of hope of making a
sale, but I've asked $250 with a rock bottom $150. This is on the basis that
it will cost quite a bit to get it shipped back to me in the UK, so if I can
get rid of
On 11/4/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sort of overran the downspout.
ooh, I thought, a new meteorological term I haven't heard of...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/4/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pretty cool lines on this one. The smooth background really sets it
off. I like it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10903547size=lg
Yeah, the rock wall's nice too!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Thanks everyone.
Stig Vidar Hovland
Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] p#229; vegne av frank
theriault [knarftheria...@gmail.com]
Sendt: 10. april 2010 19:33
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Monthly photo club photos
On Fri, Apr
Cotty wrote:
On 12/4/10, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've taken a pragmatic approach. I don't hold out a lot of hope of
making a
sale, but I've asked $250 with a rock bottom $150. This is on the
basis that
it will cost quite a bit to get it shipped back to me in the UK, so
Awesome, Dag - that's a seriously good photograph
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of DagT
Sent: Monday, 12 April 2010 5:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PAW14 - spring 2
And some further questions:
I assume that the framing fee did not include return shipping. What happens if
(when...) a work does not sell? I'm happy to donate mine to whatever is
convenient but what to put for the return shipping address?
As I don't do Paypal maybe someone (Mark...) would
2010/4/12 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:
As I don't do Paypal maybe someone (Mark...) would provide me with a suitably
worthy Paypal account address for monies to go to in the unlikely event of a
sale.
You can use mine. I've done the same for the widow of the late oil
minister of
2010/4/12 Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
How about a foot pump and a black balloon to hold the bag open… :o)
You'll want to shoot taller flowers too so you need a dolly for your
helium bottle, some fishing line and a small weight to keep the
bag-ground in place...
--
PDML
haha fun shot! still trying to figure out the big idea of it
thanks for sharing
ecke
2010/4/11 Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
Looks like the statue is getting ready to strangle it !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Cory
2010/4/11 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
That ain't no cliche, it's a beautiful photo! I like the way the moon
balances the reflections on the water, and the connection the masts and
flagpole make between the two. A minor quibble is that everything is rather
centered side-to-side.
what
hehe =)
2010/4/10 Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com:
At the coast, in an adjoining parking space.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=484
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
2010/4/12 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
I don't know if I acheaved what I was trying for but what the heck
I think you damn near did - if you bring the camera up a little higher
or shoot from a bit farther away with a longer lens to compress the
glasses in the foreground some more so
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
2. Sigma 10-20
3. Tamron 10-24
Am not into fish-eyes so those options are out. Any votes for or
against any of those listed above?
Thanks!
Bong
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Asked myself the same question to be prepared for when I have money to
burn and the DA* 11-16 is still not there...
Result I found in reviews and forum discussions (Caveat: this is hands
off information):
1. Best build, sharpest, most neutral color rendition, however pricey as hell
2. Worst
2010/4/11 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
Any way, here it is.:-)
I take it the airborne one is Gil Scott? ]=)
Cheers
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Hi Team,
Yet another K-x pano, this time shot during a visit to the Powerhouse
Museum with my little guy Thomas. What's particularly interesting
about this pano from a technical perspective is that it was shot with
the camera in Av mode, each exposure is different.
It consists of 4x1 landscape
fa 100mm f2.8 macro or fa 77m f1.8 ltd
trying to decide between the two as I cant afford both do I want a
faster, smaller limited lens or a slower, larger lens with macro?
I dont have a macro lens that I am happy with, BUT I really am loving using
my fa 50mm f1.7 as a leave on the body all
On 12/04/2010, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
I don’t have a macro lens that I am happy with, BUT I really am loving using
my fa 50mm f1.7 as a “leave on the body all the time” lens right now, and am
thinking that the FA77mm would be awesome for this purpose with just a bit
more
On 12/04/2010, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
what rick said precisely
thanks for sharing
ecke
Thanks for the comments everyone!
The area is close to where I do a lot of work so it's a nice walk and
generally good for photography. The stitch wasn't hard at all, I just
always allow
Tanya Love wrote:
fa 100mm f2.8 macro or fa 77m f1.8 ltd
trying to decide between the two as I can’t afford both – do I want a
faster, smaller limited lens or a slower, larger lens with macro?
I don’t have a macro lens that I am happy with, BUT I really am loving using
my fa 50mm f1.7 as a
On 12/04/2010, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
That's a really interesting image, the stillness/sharpness of the
foreground really heavily contrasts with the action and spray of the
bike through the water, nice.
Now a question of
Been said, not too original, but I'm enjoying this
Richard-Strauss-autumn of film.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_04/10_04_lunchbreak/01.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_04/10_04_festivalcrowd/01.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_04/10_04_fouratefive/01.htm
Derby Chang wrote:
Only, I would not want to live in a world where I could only have one
prime.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
2010/4/12 Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com:
fa 100mm f2.8 macro or fa 77m f1.8 ltd
trying to decide between the two as I can’t afford both – do I want a
faster, smaller limited lens or a slower, larger lens with macro?
I don’t have a macro lens that I am happy with, BUT I really am loving
2010/4/12 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
more unobtrusive
or less obtrusive if you prefer proper english =/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
DA 12-24! The reviews are spot on. I grabbed one before Pentax raised
the price to DA* levels.
You could also switch to the dark side and grab a Tokina 12-24 for
canon or nikon. Used prices for the Tokina are max 300-350 euro. I see
a new (used) Tokina every 1-2 weeks. The DA version is 1050 euro
Like this, Bruce. DoF and composition, as well as including the car, very well
done.
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/11/10, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Roller Coaster
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday,
Good, Bruce! Glad I posted it rather than nearly deleting it to make room on
the card.
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/11/10, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Big Foot is Real!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
Tanya, as such, FA 77 is not suitable for close up work. Its MDF is
limiting (no pun intended). However, if instead of going after FA
100/2.8 macro you manage to put your hands on this
(http://www.techtheman.com/2008/06/cosinapentaxphoenixpromaster-11-matched.html),
it might as well make your
Well chosen scene Peter! I'm fussy enough, however, to want the DoF needed to
cover the scene and even cloning to eliminate the dark lower right corner.
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/11/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO -- A
Bong Manayon wrote:
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
2. Sigma 10-20
3. Tamron 10-24
Am not into fish-eyes so those options are out. Any votes for or
against any of those listed above?
Thanks!
Bong
I don't think those focal lengths are 35mm-equivalent numbers. I suspect
they're double
Hi Mike: If your photograph doesn't sell, Sue will contact you on the cost
of return shipping, and she will tell you the Paypal address to pay to.
She does all that from her end and contacts each individual artist.
Where it says: *I, __, etc etc*is the place to sign
the
Please repeat after me: There is no such thing as equivalent focal length!
They are APS-C lenses and the focal lengths are as marked. Super wide
angle lenses.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hi Mike: If your photograph doesn't sell, Sue will contact you on
the cost of return shipping, and she will tell you the Paypal
address to pay to. She does all that from her end and contacts each
individual artist.
Where it says:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
2. Sigma 10-20
3. Tamron 10-24
Am not into fish-eyes so those options are out. Any votes for or
against any of those listed above?
Thanks!
Bong
I don't think those focal lengths are
Sounds good, Paul. That works :-). Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: Exhibit details
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Christine Aguila
I normally get my wife to do all my eBay bidding (she has the good
feedback and the PayPal account). Most sellers agree to ship to
Australia for her (540+ positive feedback). If there are any problems
I'll get back to you.
Thanks for finding the auction. I did look, but obviously before it was
2010/4/12 Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com:
I normally get my wife to do all my eBay bidding (she has the good
feedback and the PayPal account). Most sellers agree to ship to
Australia for her (540+ positive feedback). If there are any problems
I'll get back to you.
Thanks for finding the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I don't think those focal lengths are 35mm-equivalent numbers. I suspect
they're double ~ such as the Pentax DA 12-24 is really like a 35mm lens of
24-48mm focal length.
Nice wide angle-to-normal lens, but hardly a
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Please repeat after me: There is no such thing as equivalent focal length!
They are APS-C lenses and the focal lengths are as marked. Super wide
angle lenses.
Amen.
I take those numbers for their face value. I
Christine -
Add my SO, Marcia...
TIA
-p
On 4/11/2010 11:58 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hopefully, I got everyone :-) Let me know of any changes I need to
make. Bob Sullivan I have been discussing dinner options for Sat
night, so we need to get the number of folks coming as close as
You're right - I added a space for my signature opposite the Date.
-p
On 4/12/2010 2:39 AM, mike wilson wrote:
BTW; I think the contract is very badly designed. It doesn't actually ask for
my signature anywhere.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
On Apr 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've been struggling with the CV and the artists statement, if anyone
wants to read and comment, I posted them on my LJ:
http://lrc.livejournal.com/1094985.html
Larry,
Here is a good description of you that might help:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well chosen scene Peter! I'm fussy enough, however, to want the DoF needed to
cover the scene and even cloning to eliminate the dark lower right corner.
Jack
What Jack said. That bit in the LRC is a distraction form what
Tanya.
I have both, but don't use either as much as i should.
I like my 77 ltd, and my 100 f2.8 is hit and miss for me. Not sure if
sending it in with my K10D to have them adjust to the 100 would help
or not. My images are not as sharp as others i have seen.
I do have the DA F 50 f2.8 macro
Stig,
Those are very interesting.
For me, - the second one woud benefit from some sort of frame/mat.
I like the first one better.
As for fishing, - there was a nice joke.
A guy, after fishing for entire day without catching anything and hence
very frustrated, is packing up in a very angry
Neat shot. Well composed. I think with or with out the car it works
Dave
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
There is a road nearby that is just a bit hilly.
Pentax K20D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 300mm
ISO 400, 1/100 sec @ f/8, tripod
Love all three
Dave
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Been said, not too original, but I'm enjoying this Richard-Strauss-autumn of
film.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_04/10_04_lunchbreak/01.htm
Super shot.
One take.??
Dave
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, DA*16-50 @50mm, 1/90s, f/4.5, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At this size it looks fantastic. Every thing blends very well. Love
the colours here.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
Yet another K-x pano, this time shot during a visit to the Powerhouse
Museum with my little guy Thomas. What's
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 11/4/10, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pretty cool lines on this one. The smooth background really sets it
off. I like it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10903547size=lg
Yeah, the rock wall's nice too!
Nice light and mood here.
Dave
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
We had a bit of rain here today. Sort of overran the downspout.
Pentax K20D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 300mm
ISO 400, 1/20 sec @ f/8, tripod
On the fence with this one. Not sure if seeing more of the front boot
would help, but its not bad.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
While she didn't dance in them Cat showed up at Friday Night Blues in a
rockin' pair of boots.
Shot in the lobby, with
Another great one of Grace.
Dave
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:30 PM, paul stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10903616size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
hehe _
I typed in my name then took it out and signed in those two places...
but there is at least two other places where I typed it.
It was helpful for Christine to send both a .doc and a pdf as I only
have a pdf reader.
and the doc, amazingly, was downward compatable with my ancient MS
From: P. J. Alling
I don't know if I acheaved what I was trying for but what the heck
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20alotofglass.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
The repetition and the
From: eckinator
more unobtrusive
or less obtrusive if you prefer proper english =/
What's improper about more unobtrusive?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Hint - Look at any of his photos on his site
ann
Boris Liberman wrote:
On 4/12/2010 7:58 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Jostein (I don't think I know Jostein's last name :-))
I can tell you :-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Great image, wonderful grab!
Where is that sculpture?
Dan
Yeah, sure is -- I'm guessing that the sculpture is wolf, not coyote,
not dog - given it is in Canada.
Paul already mentioned Ginsburg so my wiseacre remark about it not
looking like him shall stay on
From: P N Stenquist
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
2. Sigma 10-20
3. Tamron 10-24
Am not into fish-eyes so those options are out. Any votes for or
against any of those listed above?
Thanks!
Bong
I don't
Could we all please please at least keep the original link to someone's
PESO or GESO in
the subsequent comments emails? I'm getting really pounded by IRL
obligations and have
to skip around - as surely most of us do - and miss a lot of the
original post...
This is especially confusing when
2010/4/12 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
From: eckinator
more unobtrusive
or less obtrusive if you prefer proper english =/
What's improper about more unobtrusive?
In my understanding un- means not, i.e. zero. Thus, more unobtrusive
means less than zero obtrusive. I doubt there is
ann sanfedele wrote:
hehe _
I typed in my name then took it out and signed in those two places...
but there is at least two other places where I typed it.
It was helpful for Christine to send both a .doc and a pdf as I only
have a pdf reader. and the doc, amazingly, was downward compatable
On Apr 12, 2010, at 4:03 AM, Tanya Love wrote:
fa 100mm f2.8 macro or fa 77m f1.8 ltd
I haven't had a chance to play with the 100/2.8, but ...
My FA77 is my favorite lens. It seems that every time I look through
the viewfinder, with it on the camera, it brings a smile to my face.
The
Well, you have a good eye for panos that are out of the ordinary.
Technically it looks very good. I am not one to complain about the
K-x, it has done what I have asked of it. Well done, sir!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 12, 2010, 3:38:57 AM, you wrote:
RS Hi Team,
RS Yet another
One thing to consider is how much different the 77 would be compared
to the 50. While slightly different, I think you would end up having
to decide all the time between the two. Since you really like the 50
now, I think it would be better to get something more different (the
macro) rather than
I went out with several local shooters on Sunday for a Prime Lens
walkabout. The premise is that you use a prime (or one focal length
of a zoom), and shoot with that the entire time. I used my A50 f/2.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/sets/72157623711330929/
--
Aloha Photographer
On 12/4/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would not want to live in a world where I could only have one prime.
That's a T-shirt it ever I saw one.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 12/4/10, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
Mark!
Damn.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/4/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
the canted top plate
makes a lot of sense (especially, I imagine on a 645). I recant
*sigh*
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.jpg
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On 12/4/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
the canted top plate
makes a lot of sense (especially, I imagine on a 645). I recant
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 12/4/10, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://users.tpg.com.au/distudio/temp/Pano-IMGX01432sm.jpg
That's real nice Rob.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 12/4/10, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
Please repeat after me: There is no such thing as equivalent focal length!
They are APS-C lenses and the focal lengths are as marked. Super wide
angle lenses.
Very true, come on people!!!
But if they were equivalent focal lengths,
Den 12. apr. 2010 kl. 13.26 skrev Rob Studdert:
On 12/04/2010, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
That's a really interesting image, the stillness/sharpness of the
foreground really heavily contrasts with the action and spray of the
I like this one.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4512606179/in/set-72157623711330929/
Dave
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:02 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I went out with several local shooters on Sunday for a Prime Lens
walkabout. The premise is that you use a prime
2010/4/12 Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com:
I did the same. And even more amazingly, Ann, the doc was openable in the
freeware OpenOffice.app on my Mac. Kudos to the gallery for apparently
using ancient s/w.
You could also have opened it in GoogleDocs. -Just mention it since
you post
Weell, in a dream world, I would be able to get myself an ultra sharp
100mm, f1.8 macro that is small and light, and has beautiful bokeh...
...but, we *are* talking Pentax here, so erm, there are few things that they
bring out that are ideal (as much as I love them!).
I tend to agree with
On 4/12/2010 11:44 AM, Tanya Love wrote:
Weell, in a dream world, I would be able to get myself an ultra sharp
100mm, f1.8 macro that is small and light, and has beautiful bokeh...
...but, we *are* talking Pentax here, so erm, there are few things that they
bring out that are ideal (as much
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Just to confuse matters, I've been having a wonderful time using Sasha's
tamron 90/2.8. I haven't used the pentax 100/2.8 but I like the images from
the tamron better than with my Pentax DFA 50/2.8.
I've been running up
P N Stenquist wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
Thinking of ...
1. Pentax DA 12-24
2. Sigma 10-20
3. Tamron 10-24
Am not into fish-eyes so those options are out. Any votes for or
against any of those listed above?
Thanks!
Bong
I don't think those
There are two common crops for dSLRs as compared to FF SLR, 1.5 (Nikon
and Pentax) and 1.6 (Canon).
Canon has a 1.3 crop on some of their pro bodies.
PS sensors are a whole other barrel of fish and there are many sizes,
but they don't correlate because the lenses are not interchangeable.
On
You couldn't have done better if you had posed her. The curved wall and the
raised knee work beautifully.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sun, 4/11/10, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - Sunning
To:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:33 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/4/12 Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com:
I did the same. And even more amazingly, Ann, the doc was openable in the
freeware OpenOffice.app on my Mac. Kudos to the gallery for apparently
using ancient s/w.
You could also have opened it
2010/4/12 paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Showoff:-)
hehehe.
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
6 MP, FF. It would have been a keeper.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 12/4/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
the canted top plate
makes a lot of sense (especially, I imagine on a 645). I recant
*sigh*
If the sensor had worked reliably, maybe.
As it is, it turned out to be a loser.
(and I still prefer the flexibilitty of the two-wheel interface)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 03:24:58PM -0400, Steven Desjardins wrote:
6 MP, FF. It would have been a keeper.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:32 PM,
High performance ultra wide zooms (UW) dont really exist. Go with a UW
prime
and even that wont match basic wide primes.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
This place used to be a classic diner, but it has been extensively
renovated to look more like a restaurant. There are only a few things
about it that interest me:
1. In its former life, when it was known as The Bridgewater Diner,
this was the hangout for my friends and I during senior year in
From: eckinator
2010/4/12 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
From: eckinator
more unobtrusive
or less obtrusive if you prefer proper english =/
What's improper about more unobtrusive?
In my understanding un- means not, i.e. zero. Thus, more unobtrusive
means less than zero
On Apr 12, 2010, at 3:38 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
High performance ultra wide zooms (UW) don’t really exist. Go with a
UW
prime
and even that wont match basic wide primes.
--
The DA 12-24/4 is reportedly comparable in performance to the DA
14/2.8, although it's a stop slower. I've also
wouldn't more unobtrusive be sorta like stating your
gas tank is more empty than empty?
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
On 4/12/2010 11:56 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
Just to confuse matters, I've been having a wonderful time using Sasha's
tamron 90/2.8. I haven't used the pentax 100/2.8 but I like the images from
the tamron better than with
a 12mm lens on APS is not as wide as a 15mm lens on FF
hence, the A15mm wont perform as well on on FF or even
APS as a 12mm on APS. (in general). The problem is that
it takes to many elements which hurts the flaring reduction.
Cost and lens speed are also factors. I would bet the
DA 15mm
Like it, Dan and can certainly relate to your attachment.
Crisp image, well rendered!
Jack
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Another Jersey Diner
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
Not really replying to JCO, just tagging into the thread here.
The students in my class usually don't quite get the difference in
sensor sizes and the relationship to focal length until they see the
circular photo towards the bottom of this page.
It superimposes three sensor sizes over the
Went out to Raulston Arboretum in Raleigh mid-day today. Just wanted to
get out and photograph SOMETHING! It's either that or cut the damn grass
(which I'm going to have to do this afternoon anyway).
I was struck by the color of the Japanese Maple.
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
