Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day :) We went ring shopping together a couple of
days later and it's finally just come back from being resized to fit her finger.
http://www.multi.net.nz/rock/
We've been together for probably almost 15 years by now so
Quoting David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz:
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day :) We went ring shopping together a
couple of days later and it's finally just come back from being
resized to fit her finger.
http://www.multi.net.nz/rock/
We've been
Congratulations David. Much happiness to you and the lucky lady.
Paul
On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:11 AM, David Mann wrote:
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day :) We went ring shopping together a couple
of days later and it's finally just come back from
Thanks for sharing that! Their happiness is infectious, and a welcome
image on a miserably gray, cold, back-to-the-grind morning here on the
other side of the world. Congrats to them!
:)
-c
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Pete McIntosh peter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
A rare PESO from
These guys always insist on capture images. Both media always
involve some PP, minimally the JPEG engine or photolab's chemical
development. For absolute quality comparison you should allow both
files to be optimized in LR. The problem with all of these
comparisons is that they are typically
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
But really, while a 600 mb file is larger than many, it is not large on a
absolute scale. If I was ony processing K5 raw files I would have stuck with
6 gigs of ram.
Mark
Heh. If I could expand the RAM in my 2008 iMac to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The funny thing is that for me, I've been getting far better image quality
with my DSLRs than I have ever gotten with film.
The first 11x14 I had printed from my K10D (taken the first weekend I
had it, with the kit lens) was
Thanks, Frank!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: knarftheria...@gmail.com knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Blowing Bubbles
Terrific photo, Jack!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
Thank you, Bob!
No, just a couple OK shots showing the beak.
One reason being I had the focus point set at 5 sensor points and a couple
times the darker background got accidentally involved blowing out the egret.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To:
Congratulations, to you both!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:11 AM
Subject: PESO: The Stone
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day
For the few that could be interested, the camera is an Asahi Pentax model K
(1958) featuring 42x1 screw mount, while the lens is a Takumar 83mm f/1.9.
Cheers,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
On 17/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
The real advantage of digital for me is that i can take so many
pictures of the same scene, chanage settings, and just
I'll second that !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
LOL. I'd just like to finish it. Damn students interrupting me with
career issues.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 17/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
The real advantage of digital for me is that i can take so many
pictures of the same
I started to go through my pictures last night to see what i might
submit to the PDML 2012 photo book. I found one i liked, opened LR3 to
check the settings and export to my folder. Lo and behold, it gave me
a message that file IGP_X was missing. It did it on the next
picture in another folder
Congratulations!
Nice rock.
:-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz
Sent: January 17, 2012 1/17/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: The Stone
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day :) We
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/nyregion/despite-long-slide-by-kodak-rochester-avoids-decay.html?_r=1hp
I spent eight years there, and still have a soft spot for the place.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Congratulations, Dave. All the best to you and your bride to be. We'll
be looking for wedding pix, you know. ;]
-p
On 1/17/2012 2:11 AM, David Mann wrote:
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new years day :) We went ring shopping together a couple of
days later
Great look there, Wears it well
Dave
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
A new installment on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats. Scroll down to
see today's photo:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post.html
Hope you enjoy as much
Good news indeed!
thanks, Brian
ann
On 1/17/2012 01:08, apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
G'day all
Just browsing my PPG account and I see a notification which states:
For a limited time only, Photo Gallery users will be able to update
images uploaded before the new redesign to a higher
On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The funny thing is that for me, I've been getting far better image quality
with my DSLRs than I have ever gotten with film.
The first 11x14 I had printed from my K10D
I have no idea, of course. But that happens to me sometimes, too, if
that makes you feel any better? I don't think I have ever encountered
it on export, but I will notice a ? in the upper right of the image
thumbnail (or next to the folder) every now then, indicating LR has
lost track of it.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
I have no idea, of course. But that happens to me sometimes, too, if
that makes you feel any better? I don't think I have ever encountered
it on export, but I will notice a ? in the upper right of the image
On 16/01/2012 6:52 PM, Mark C wrote:
This weekend I finally downloaded Photoshop CS5 and installed it (I've
been making do with CS4 up till now). I also bumped up the RAM in my PC
from 6 gigs to 16. Anticipating blazing fast performance, I scanned some
6x7 negs and started processing them. The
If you prefer film, shoot where film has more strengths and quit whining.
Who is it, exactly, that is whining here?
The guy who shot the video does not strike me as some Luddite who is
railing against digital. He is the owner of both cameras.
I agree that there are a lot of questions regarding
Thank you, Godfrey!
It makes sense.
As for experimenting, - yes, it is possible (and I've been noticing
certain things along the way) and I am not afraid, but I wish I had time
for that and many other things. So, your information is helpful.
Igor
Tue Jan 17 01:17:30 EST 2012
Godfrey DiGiorgi
From: Cory Waters
I'm sad to say that I did not take near enough pictures in 2011 to
stumble upon anything I'd submit to the annual. This really does put
me in mind of the old saying that nobody on their death bed ever said
I wish I spent more time at work.
Cory
On 1/16/2012 12:43 PM, Mark
On Jan 17, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
The appeal and various advantages of digital is undeniable. But I
think it is good to be reminded that shooting film is still valid for
many people for MANY different reasons. Related:
Related:
You may also find this short booklet inspirational (read entirely online):
http://www.issuu.com/nitsa/docs/notartistpreview
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Correction. Looks like first 19 pages of a 115 page book are available on Issuu.
Full book here:
http://www.amazon.com/Am-Not-Artist-Unconventional-Photography/dp/143822267X/
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The funny thing is that for me, I've been getting far better image quality
with my DSLRs than I have ever gotten with film.
The first 11x14 I had printed from my K10D (taken the first weekend I
had it,
From: Mark C
This weekend I finally downloaded Photoshop CS5 and installed it (I've
been making do with CS4 up till now). I also bumped up the RAM in my PC
from 6 gigs to 16. Anticipating blazing fast performance, I scanned some
6x7 negs and started processing them. The images themselves take
anyone know why a folder named 48states , or 905683, etc... comes up in
explorer, or on My computer in front of all the folders that start with
2002, for instance.
The 48states was created by me, the 2002, etc ones, were created when
uploading files. yet alphanamed folders come correctly
Dave,
Congratulations to both of you! It's good to make it official, and
you selected a pretty ring.
Don't let the wedding details bog you down, sooner is better...
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:11 AM, David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz wrote:
Time for some good news from me, for
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
anyone know why a folder named 48states , or 905683, etc... comes up in
explorer, or on My computer in front of all the folders that start with
2002, for instance.
The 48states was created by me, the 2002, etc ones, were created when
uploading files. yet alphanamed
I can only echo others on the use of light and the reflections in this
photo. A work with beauty and elegance. No bobbles evident.
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:23:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Blowing
Processing 500+ Mbyte image files takes serious compute power, and
fast IO. You're waiting 90 seconds or so? For a 105 Mpixel image file?
My gosh, when I worked for NASA doing a 1024x1024 pixel, 8bit per
component rendering from 600 Mbytes of raw data took about 12 hours.
I think the adjustment
Stupid.
G
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Purchased my first Rolleicord this morning, a model V (mainly because
I thought it was too cheap).
Whilst Googling around I came across this interesting video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8lWLEtC8wY
LOL
It takes more time to formulate, ask questions, get responses, and
discuss them than it does to experiment in Lightroom. ;-)
G
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Thank you, Godfrey!
It makes sense.
As for experimenting, - yes, it is possible (and I've
LoL..Don.
Thanks very much!
Jack
From: Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:20 AM
Subject: re :Blowing Bobbles
I can only echo others on the use of light and the reflections in this photo. A
work with beauty and
Dario thanks!
Now I can change the folder to 4800states so I can find it more easily :-)
bu hmm. doesnt explain why the folders with a long string of numbers
starting with 9 are in front of them tho hmmm
ann
On 1/17/2012 12:13, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I noticed it
On 1/17/2012 13:21, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Dario thanks!
Now I can change the folder to 4800states so I can find it more easily :-)
but hmm. doesnt explain why the folders with a long string of numbers
starting with 9 are in front of them tho hmmm
ann
Oh wait - yes it does, the 9 series
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Stupid.
Care to expand on that scintillating thought, Godfrey? Or did you just
need a bran muffin this morning?
:)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
First time I've run into this one.
K7 under warehouse fluorescent lights creates an interference
line about 20% in from the left side, adding a purplish tinge to the image.
So ... has anyone here run into this and ...
Anyone have a Photoshop macro for dealing with it by adjusting the color of
No need to expand, really, but ok:
No information on which Rolleiflex, film, or how the image was
processed, scanned, or rendered.
No information on what Canon, what lens, etc etc.
No information on what skill the guy doing this inane comparison has to offer.
Presentation of the surprising
On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
No need to expand, really, but ok:
No information on which Rolleiflex, film, or how the image was
processed, scanned, or rendered.
No information on what Canon, what lens, etc etc.
No information on what skill the guy doing this inane
This happens to me all the time since I migrate my Lr setup back and
forth between two computers using rsync and even though the folder
layout *should* be the same, Lr doesn't respect symbolic links, g
(If you're not a unix/linux weenie, don't worry about the jargon, it's
not important). '
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
anyone know why a folder named 48states , or 905683, etc... comes up
jsut curious why this should happen -desn't seem right
ann
Latest windows incarnations have the ability to discriminate between
numbers
and letters, hence they recognize that 48 is a lower
Hooray! Congratulations.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: 17 January 2012 08:11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: The Stone
Time for some good news from me, for once.
We got engaged on new
On 1/17/2012 14:24, Bob W wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
anyone know why a folder named 48states , or 905683, etc... comes up
jsut curious why this should happen -desn't seem right
ann
Latest windows incarnations have the ability to discriminate between
numbers
and letters, hence they
On 1/16/2012 17:32, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Paul. Also, thanks for not correcting the bobbled spelling of bubbles.
;)
Jack
Well he just thought you were Dave so what was the use?
JAck - were the stripes of light on the bird made from the ripples (as
Paul surmised) or are they from
On 1/16/2012 17:32, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Paul. Also, thanks for not correcting the bobbled spelling of
bubbles. ;)
One of my girlfriends used to call me Bobbles. I was a bit disappointed when
I actually read the email.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You know, G, I think Stupid, G qualifies as a Mark!.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Stupid.
G
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Purchased my first Rolleicord this morning, a model V (mainly because
I
I have been using my M42 lenses on my K-x for a couple years now, but
over the weekend was the first time
I tried putting one (1.9 / 85) on a program plus that I had picked up
and never used.
Wow. What a dream. So big and bright and easy to focus.
I left the shutter on auto and pretty much
I listed the Konika - starting real cheap and BIN cheap (for what I paid
for the Pentax flash at the Sal Army yesterday.
Anyone need one cheap grab it.
I jsut don't know for sure ALL the cameras it will work on but you will
One annoyance - it wan't in ebay's catalogue and they nagged me about
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
No need to expand, really, but ok:
No information on which Rolleiflex, film, or how the image was
processed, scanned, or rendered.
No information on what Canon, what lens, etc etc.
No information on what skill the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
He did leave a lot of info out of his video.
What he did mention, though, was that the resulting digital file was 485 mb.
I sure as heck am not about to load up my drive with a bunch of those!
sounds more like slow mail
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 17/01/12 8:55 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for
On Jan 17, 2012, at 12:42, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
First time I've run into this one.
K7 under warehouse fluorescent lights creates an interference
line about 20% in from the left side, adding a purplish tinge to the image.
So ... has anyone here run into this and ...
Anyone have a
On Jan 17, 2012, at 15:25, Sam L wrote:
I have been using my M42 lenses on my K-x for a couple years now, but
over the weekend was the first time
I tried putting one (1.9 / 85) on a program plus that I had picked up
and never used.
Wow. What a dream. So big and bright and easy to focus.
Quoting Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au:
sounds more like slow mail
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
Thanks, Ann!
Yes, I'm convinced the shadows are from the sun's reflecting off the ripples.
Had I not metered off the body of the egret I can't imagine they would have
been visible. They're presence is a big reason I posted the image.
I've been correcting the bobbled spelling with every reply,
Yeah..well..I can see why. 8\
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: PESO: Blowing Bobbles
On 1/16/2012 17:32, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Paul. Also, thanks for
Congratulations !
Start to get your arms around the fact that the wedding festivities are more
for other people than you and your lady.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: David Mann d...@multisport.net.nz
Subject: PESO: The
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Canon DSLR vs Rolleicord
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On
On Jan 18, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
Congratulations to both of you! It's good to make it official, and
you selected a pretty ring.
Don't let the wedding details bog you down, sooner is better...
We're being quite relaxed about the planning. Our intention is just to have
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would cause a delay
in just one email source ...
i suspect an
On Jan 17, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012, at 12:42, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
First time I've run into this one.
K7 under warehouse fluorescent lights creates an interference
line about 20% in from the left side, adding a purplish tinge to the image.
So ... has
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
If he's shooting at slower than flash sync speed, it shouldn't be an issue.
should it?
In the US, any shutter speed 1/120th or faster is going to be an
issue. It's the flicker of the lights, not the shutter, that matter.
On 16/01/2012 11:01 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day Pete
It's nice to be receiving PDML mail again.
An informal wedding is the way to go in my view. Your son and his new
wife certainly look happy.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
On 17/01/2012 2:02 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Congratulations to the happy couple! I love BW for wedding shots.
Please make the PESOs a little less rare, Pete.
:)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
Thanks Darren. Will do my best.
Regards,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 17/01/2012 2:15 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Pete,
They sure look happy. Congratulations to them.
A nice PESO by you - good catch!
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Pete McIntoshpeter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
A rare PESO from me, but couldn't resist...
On 17/01/2012 11:54 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Thanks for sharing that! Their happiness is infectious, and a welcome
image on a miserably gray, cold, back-to-the-grind morning here on the
other side of the world. Congrats to them!
:)
-c
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Pete
In the vestibule of our church, on Sunday morning:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14993316size=lg
(K-7, FA 24-90)
Comments welcome!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012, at 15:25, Sam L wrote:
I have been using my M42 lenses on my K-x for a couple years now, but
over the weekend was the first time
I tried putting one (1.9 / 85) on a program plus that I had picked up
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_C2Dvws/1/1676309644_4xGRtnc/Large
I was browsing some files to find one for the next month's PUG and
looking for some items for ebay and came across these guys
comment as you see fit as one of our local
Dave, Larry, Paul, thanks for your comments. It helps when the model is as
pretty as her. She was a good sport about the whole thing as one can tell by
that fetching smile.
Thanks as well to everyone who looked. I've got to make a point of getting more
posts on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats
On 1/17/2012 12:03 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Where do you have Photoshop's scratch disk?
If I understand correctly Photoshop's scratch disk is not the same as
your system swap file. I was told that it should not be on the same
physical disk as the OS and applications because it can materially
On 1/17/2012 12:33 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Processing 500+ Mbyte image files takes serious compute power, and
fast IO. You're waiting 90 seconds or so? For a 105 Mpixel image file?
My gosh, when I worked for NASA doing a 1024x1024 pixel, 8bit per
component rendering from 600 Mbytes of raw
Me like Ann... As you already know I have a fondness for animals and of
course good captures of said animals.
Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Like the shadows cast by the gates.
Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Rick
Womer
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:44 PM
To: Pentax
On 1/17/2012 8:00 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Heh. If I could expand the RAM in my 2008 iMac to 8 or 16 Gig RAM I
would. I regularly fill 4 Gig with just Lightroom and Photoshop on a
single K20D RAW image. You do some adjustments in Lr, then edit in Ps
and wham! the swapping starts. Granted I do
On 1/17/2012 10:52 AM, William Robb wrote:
Mark, how much memory have you allocated to Photoshop (you do this
within Photoshop)? With that much ram, you should be able to set a
very high allocation, probably 12-14 gigs.
Also, if you really need speed, set a couple of drives up as a striped
thanks , Jeff!
yes , I do believe I've noticed you like critters too
ann
On 1/17/2012 22:29, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
Me like Ann... As you already know I have a fondness for animals and of
course good captures of said animals.
Photo Captures by Jeffery
Cool shot. It's as if they were posing for you.
Btw, the plural for mongoose is mongooses, strange though it may sound to
our ear.
:-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Sent: January 17, 2012 1/17/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
On 1/17/2012 22:57, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool shot. It's as if they were posing for you.
Damn lucky timing it was - they scurry a lot.
Btw, the plural for mongoose is mongooses, strange though it may sound to
our ear.
:-)
cheers,
frank
Sorry my dear, it's both ways - at
The crisp detail is appealing. Unique content works especially well due to the
symmetry.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:56 PM
Subject: PEso - Symmetry
Nice image Ann, and I love the title as well.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
The Oxford English Dictionary would beg to differ (they say mongooses), but
if it's in the Official Scrabble Players Dictionary who am I to argue?
:-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Sent: January 17, 2012 1/17/12
snip
Btw, the plural for
Great hat, great portrait, and I like the reflections you caught in the shades.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
A new installment on Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats. Scroll down to
You say potato and I say potahto
a
On 1/17/2012 23:19, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
The Oxford English Dictionary would beg to differ (they say mongooses), but
if it's in the Official Scrabble Players Dictionary who am I to argue?
:-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From:
Well done. An apt title and a fun pic.
Paul
On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_C2Dvws/1/1676309644_4xGRtnc/Large
I was browsing some files to find one for the next month's PUG and looking
for
Great capture, lovely reflection.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Young Egret this AM at the reserve.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=626
K-5, DA 55~300(300mm), f/8
thanks Paul, Jack, Jeff, Frank and future commenters
tomorrow is see the eye doc day I may not be around much
ann
On 1/17/2012 23:24, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Well done. An apt title and a fun pic.
Paul
On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would
cause a
Congratulations Dave.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of David
Mann
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 6:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: The Stone
Time for some good news from me, for
I say we ask the critters what they want to be called. I'm not going to argue
with anyone or anything that can beat up a cobra. Whatever they want is fine
with me.
Hey, all the best at the doc's tomorrow, Ann. We're all pulling for you.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Ann
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/Works-In-Progress/More-Critters/15842756_C2Dvws/1/1676309644_4xGRtnc/Large
I was browsing some files to find one for the next month's PUG and
looking for some items for ebay and came across these guys
Quoting Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
In the vestibule of our church, on Sunday morning:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14993316size=lg
(K-7, FA 24-90)
nbsp;
Well seen. The gate has produced interesting shapes in the shadows.
I'm not sure that the red door on the right
I simply think you are expecting too much. 104Mpixel image files take
a tremendous amount of processing operations. I don't know anything
about the system you're using, but you describe it as Not a hot rod
system but it should be competent. Well, it sounds like it *is*
competent, it's just not
G'day all
The PPG states that the minimum size for uploading is 900 pixels high
and this is what I've been using. This size seems to be large enough
to avoid images being enlarged for viewing, except when viewed on very
large monitors (for example, on my 22 widescreen at 1680 x 1050
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
