Hi,
I like the first one, your girlfriend as a much nicer expression on her
face.
Cya
- Original Message -
From: Gerald F. Cermak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:32 AM
Subject: Which picture is better?
While in Paris last
Hi Gerald,
I prefer photo #1 over #2 due to its stronger color, her smile, the
background, and the at ease confidence of her pose.
Compared to #1, #2 looks slightly washed out, her pose is more
self-conscious and less confident, and the unfortunate alignment of her
eyes with the bluewhite
Shel,
Thank you for writing this. I am more of a lurker than an active
participant on this list, but posts like this are why I love this list.
I have both auto and manual on my Pentax. 95% of the time I leave it on
all manual, but sometimes the laziness bites me and I switch to
automatic. To
If you could remove the strand of hair running down her face, then #1,
otherwise #2.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Gerald F. Cermak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:32 PM
Subject: Which picture is better?
While in Paris
Nice pictures! Attractive woman, nice outdoor setting, life couldn't be
better for a photographer!
I have a slight preference for #1.
I find the background highlights a bit distracting in both, but less so in
#1.
On the other hand, in face-on pictures, I would expect the subject to be
looking
Hi Gerald ...
Both pictures have merit, but both suffer from jarring bokeh and
harsh background colors. Compositionally, photo #2 works better for
me, although photo #1 captures a more vibrant spirit. However, the
odd item in the lower right hand corner is distracting, as is the
knee on the
Congratulations!!
I had a similar experience a few year back. I dug out one of my old
Spotmatics, armed it with a few lenses and went on a hike (bushwalk in OZ).
I had not used the camera for 15 years and, all of a sudden a switch was
thrown. I had used the camera when my favourite
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:32:55 -0700, Gerald F. Cermak wrote:
While in Paris last weekend, my fianc and I escaped the unseasonable heat
in Jardin Luxembourg, and I got a few shots of her using her ME Super and my
K85/1.8, and would enjoy other's opinions on which is best:
I like both shots, but I
Thanks, guys!
A word of encouragement when we're facing troubles can make all the
difference.
At least I know I am not the first to have to deal with this kind of
situation and, hopefully, I won't be the last one...
The good thing about that feeling is that, at least, I know I'm learning.
I like the strand of hair. It makes the photo more... intimate.
Regards,
Bob...
--
Those who say that life is worth living at any cost
have already written an epitaph of infamy,
for there is no cause and no person
that they will not betray to stay alive.
Could it be that, sometimes, modern technology steer our attention away from
what is really essential? In my case, I do feel overwhelmed by too many
resources at times... Once I took a bag full of gear to try and shoot an
specific subject. I was less than happy about the photographs I got. It
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question: How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My guess is that,
on that particular photo, one second exposures wouldn't be short enough to
do the trick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hi Shel!
Many thanks for such a nice mail.
I really liked your mail. In fact, many experienced photographers with
whom I interacted told me exactly the same thing. Most of the time, I use
metered manul mode in my camera but while making candid street
photographs, I am forced to switch to
Gerald F. Cermak wrote:
While in Paris last weekend, my fiancé and I escaped the unseasonable heat
in Jardin Luxembourg, and I got a few shots of her using her ME Super and my
K85/1.8, and would enjoy other's opinions on which is best:
#1 http://www.spotmatic.com/images/hk_jl_01.jpg
#2
Gerald F. Cermak wrote:
While in Paris last weekend, my fiancé and I escaped the unseasonable heat
in Jardin Luxembourg, and I got a few shots of her using her ME Super and my
K85/1.8, and would enjoy other's opinions on which is best:
#1 http://www.spotmatic.com/images/hk_jl_01.jpg
#2
- Original Message -
From: Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior
Subject: Re: Multiple exposures
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question:
How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My
guess is that,
on that particular photo, one second exposures
The only way to improve over this lens in to get an FA28-70AL or FA 28-105.
It is a good lens.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Dombek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: Pentax-F Macro 35-70mm f/3.5-f/4.5 Zoom
I'd like to offer my sincere thanks to everyone that replied to my messages and helped
me get off my rear and make a decision. Specifically:
At 06:05 AM 5/31/01 -0700, I wrote:
I have 4 lens to go with my ZX-5n:
- Pentax A 28mm f2.8 (which I may sell?)
- Pentax FA 28-80mm f3.5-5.6
- Pentax
In a message dated 6/3/01 11:33:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks George. I'm waiting for mine to start acting up again. I can't
open
my camera right now as there is film in it...
Does the white roller interact in anyway with the pressure plate to hold the
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Most of the time, I use metered manul mode in
my camera but while making candid street
photographs, I am forced to switch to aperture
priority mode and let the camera take care of
the exposure.
Why are you forced to let the camera take over?
Of course, I
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all,
One of my older bodies is developing a problem: the foam where the mirror
rests while in the up position is becoming sticky (this is not the LX
sticky-mirror problem).
Boz, this is not the Pro approach, but it worked for me on an old KM
body.
Forget the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 3, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: 5 films in one tank DEVELOPING
Thanks to both of you for your replies. Some more questions
follow:
1) DEVELOPER CAPACITY TIME INCREASE
When I run 5 films through it,
Yes, that is what exactly I want to know. Any suggestion/comment??
Regards,
Ayash K.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question: How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My guess is that,
on
I have noticed the following on the PUG Home Page:
In July of 2001, Pentax will be discontinuing the LX camera body.
To commemorate the 20 year history of the ultimate 35mm Pentax camera,
a PUG style gallery will be presented in August, 2001.
We invite submissions from Pentax LX users for this
Beautiful shot, Jan. I love the contrast of the red building against
the blues of the sky and water. And the reeds or marsh grass or
whatever in the foreground are a beautiful touch.
But what I really wanted to comment on was your comment:
A remarkable apartment building on the edge of my
Eduardo wrote:
Perhaps I'm just getting a little nervous. It seems
that, the more I
learn
about photography, the worse my photos get... Had
anyone felt like this
before?
Absolutely...a few long spells, at times.
Unfortunately, there is apparently no quick fix. If
there is some way you could
Hi . This lens came wirh a used SF-1 i bought in April.I have taken 30-40 macro pics
which all seem to be fairly sharp(just some poor composition on my part)As far as the
35-70
end i find it best at the 50mm area.I have a cutsy horse pic i took with it which i'll
put on
photo.net today.Look
KEH has one listed, for anyone wanting/needing one.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Bob Poe wrote:
Mogul Tomb by Carlos Roya...Beautiful transition
from the carved window shapes to the reflected shapes
in the room. I also like the way you framed the scene
beyond the window...nice depth throughout.
Thanks for your comments, Bob. Architecture photography is one of the
Just spotted:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1243142211
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Hello!
I need some advice from the experienced darkroomers out there, please!
I finally found a cheap secondhand tank JOBO 1000 with up to 5 reels of 135 or 3 reels
of 120 film at once, 1200ml capacity. It looks great compared to the tank I
used before (2x135/1x120, leaking,...).
1) I
Hi Ray,
I think a gallery for the Spotmatic is a wonderful idea!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Ray Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 3:42 AM
Subject: Special Gallery on PUG
I have noticed the following on the
Some of the most memorable entries for me...
Mickey by Amber Dayton - great photo, great composition. Dad must be jealous
of how well you are doing. grin I especially liked how the curves and
circles seem to repeat.
Paging Mr. Escher by Dave O'Brien - great play on words/art from another
Hi,
In all probability you can use the same times as you use for smaller
tanks. However, as with the introduction of any new equipment or
technique in photography, it's a good idea to run a test or two and
calibrate your developing times.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need some advice from the
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:39:13 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Keith,
I had great luck pushing Fuji Provia 100F two stops.
Fuji claims two stops will not degrade image and I
completely agree.
Arthur Morris regularly pushes Provia 100F two stops,
but he rates it at 320 in the camera.
I've had great fun
I have the Sigma 50mm f2.8 EX. It is an excellent lens
- very sharp, very good contrast and color rendition. I bought mine
used from KEH for $160 - far less than the FA 50 f2.8 macro (even
used.)
Personally, I'd go for a fast 50mm over a macro if it was my only 50mm
prime. The ability to shoot
Hi Bob ...
Congratulations on making it through another year! Had I known
sooner that yesterday was your birthday, I probably would have had a
wonderful party in your honor, inviting the glitterati and the
downtroden as well as the usual boring and uninteresting people.
Glad to hear you had a
Hmmm... Didn't think of that. Good point.
Todd
At 04:33 PM 6/3/01 +1000, you wrote:
What about all the pros with Pentax Medium format gear surely the 6M pixel
body coupled with a lens adaptor would be of interest?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Waller,Taos View. I just like this much.
I forgot to include Taos view among my preferred images this month,
but I have an excuse: there are a lot of good photos this month, and I
am too lazy to type long messages to the list. But I must say that this
is one of
Someone might just get a deal. The guy doesn't seem to know what
he has, other than he knows it is nice, and not beaten up. Good
lick, crew, I already have 3 of them, and don't want a zoom
lens.
William Robb
Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up.
Please see:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 3, 2001 1:05 AM
Subject: re:Interesting Statistics
Hi Bill, that's a lot of hits! Makes me wonder if my images
are good enough for such a frequented site :)
Stop worrying, and keep submitting.G
Hi,
I'm in search of a graded RC paper to use with my cold light head.
About the only I see out there in stock is Ilfospeed Deluxe. Has anybody on
the list used this stuff? I've use Ilford Multicontrast RC quite a lot. Is
it similar?
Thanks,
Ed
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Agreed!
Steve Larson wrote:
I think a gallery for the Spotmatic is a wonderful idea!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter
unless you are making some caustic comment
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths
-
This message is
On Sat, 02 Jun 2001 15:59:48 -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Being neither a sailor nor an astronomer, I don't know where I might
find out where in the sky the full moon will rise. Finding out when
seems easy enough... does anyone know where I can find out where a
full moon will rise? The
You will love the Jobo. I am using the series 1500 tanks for
my roll film and the 2000 series for the large format. Ilford
states that you need at least 100ml od _stock_ solution per
film. The series 1500 tank with 1 extension (this will hold 5
35mm reels) requires 560 ml to fill to capacity
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:18:00 -0300, Eduardo Carone Costa J£nior wrote:
Perhaps I'm just getting a little nervous. It seems that, the more I learn
about photography, the worse my photos get... Had anyone felt like this
before?
Yep. It's called learning. You're now holding your own photos to a
I already asked him if he wants to ship outside the USA. If he is willing,
I'll hold my breath.
Frits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: 03 June 2001 16:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: LX underground
I believe the main purpose of a digital slr at this state is to signalize
that the
K-mount will be taken over into the digital age and that customers can
continue
buying K-mount cameras and lenses knowing that their system will be
compatible with up-to-date digital cameras.
I just recently
I know how these auctions go. He knows nothing about cameras, so he
doesn't realize the shutter is jammed, the focus ring is supposed to turn,
and that fuzzy stuff shouldn't be growing on the front element. I would
bid assuming that the camera will need atleast a CLA.
Todd
At 09:15 AM 6/3/01
- Original Message -
From: Ed Mathews
Subject: OT (sort of) Ilfospeed Deluxe paper
Hi,
I'm in search of a graded RC paper to use with my cold
light head.
About the only I see out there in stock is Ilfospeed Deluxe.
Has anybody on
the list used this stuff? I've use Ilford
In a message dated 6/3/2001 10:41:51 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ilfospeed Deluxe is nice. Similar to Multigrade, but with better
blacks, and less tendency for veiling. Kodak still makes a nice
RC graded I think (Kodabromide RC). There doesn't seem to be a
lot
On Sun, 03 Jun 2001 11:27:10 -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
[...] US Naval Observatory web site (http://www.usno.mil) [...]
Oops. Sorry folks, I should have checked that URL. The actual URL is
http://www.usno.navy.mil
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
- Original Message -
From: Ray Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 3, 2001 4:42 AM
Subject: Special Gallery on PUG
I have noticed the following on the PUG Home Page:
In July of 2001, Pentax will be discontinuing the LX camera
body.
To commemorate the 20 year
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 3, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: June PUG
Some of the most memorable entries for me...
Puye Cliff Dwellings by William Robb - truely ancient
architecture!
Thanks Bob, you are most kind.
William Robb
Remember,
My shot was obviously a flop as was last months. It's what I get for
waiting until an hour before the PUG deadline to choose a photo and scan it.
My thoughts for the month:
Renaissance Bridge by Bill Sawyer, USA
Definitely an attention getter. Reminds me of the 60's Time Tunnel
television
Joseph Tainter's: Fisheye shots from cathedrals are I think pretty
rare. This one works for me well! The tourists belong there, cathedral
fisheyed by them.
Glad you liked it. Thanks for the comment.
For those who commented on mine ( arch / whale picture).
For me, this was the best photo of
Thanks Dave, I added that to my favorites.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Dave Maki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: Bad Moon Rising
Steve, big computers can get the info over the internet.
I found this lens on ebay. I thought they only mad takumar like that, not
Pentax.
This is the lens in question
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1243246843
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute
Puye Cliff Dwellings by William Robb
Nice shot except for all that McDonald's crapola. Sheesh,
what ever
inspired you to do that? ;-) How do you say Puye?
pooh yea
William Robb
Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up.
Please see:
I used to have one but sold it out for the following reasons:
1. it is pretty lightweight for a 300mm lens but still in some cases I thought it
should have a tripod collar
2. wide-open - and this is how I like using telephotos for some types of photography -
it is pretty good by an ED lens
Frankly, F:2.8 and 1/500s under the conditions you
describe sound pretty much correct to me both when using the sunny 16 rule
(compensated for overcast light) and based on my experience (eg. my 600/4 at
F:4.5 in sunshine for a medium toned subject yields approximately 1/1500s with
100ISO
You're referring to the FA*300/4.5, the F* model does
have a tripod collar, and if I'm not mistaken is a bit
heavier.
Nicholas Wright
--- Jaros3aw Brzeziñski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to have one but sold it out for the following
reasons:
1. it is pretty lightweight for a 300mm lens
On 4 Jun 2001, at 0:31, Pål Jensen wrote:
Todd wrote:
It should perform quite well, as you are just using the center of the image
produced by the lens, which is where most lenses perorm best.
They still show visible light fall-off at the corners at wide apertures. Also,
when used on
[snip]
Geordie Clarke's Silo at Night...I like the
perspective, and the contrast which I find both subtle
and dramatic in color and subject. I think a wider
lens might have made the bottom left a bit less
crowded.
[snip]
Warmly,
Bob
Thanks Bob. I know what you mean about using a
I agree. I use my LX more than any other camera I won, but my Spotmatics
still own my heart. Thoe are the cameras I lusted after when I couldn't
afford a Pentax, and they're very special to me. I suspect that many
other Pentaxians feel the same way. A Spotmatic tribute is certainly a
good idea.
I've been getting delivery failure responses on 3 mail message to PDML, but
my test message last night went through fine. Is there some general problem
with pdml.net's mail server?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Bill has raised some important issues here. But remember that a
commemorative gallery can be unofficial. In other words, all those who
own a Spotmatic could shoot their PUG entry for the appropriate month
with the Spotmatic and indicate as much on their submission information.
However the use of
snip
Silo at Night by Geordie Clarke - I like everything about this
photo, from
the composition to the light and dark to the industrial might it
conveys to
the moon in the dark sky...nice work and close to home!
snip
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks for the kind words Bob!
regards,
Geordie
Just returned from the Grandfather Nature Photo Weekend. PDML members
attending were, Jeepgirl, Mark Roberts, Tom Van Veen, John DeLoach and
myself. Our own Doug Brewer was speaker on Friday night. Turns out he's a
pretty fair photographer, judging by the slides he showed us. Saturday
night
Some of the other folks at GFNPW got to shoot some with the MZ-S and will
tell you all about it.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Dan Scott wrote:
Perhaps I'm just getting a little nervous. It seems that, the more I learn
about photography, the worse my photos get... Had anyone felt like this
before?
I am just beginning to experience this with photography. I get some
decent shots, many average to poor shots, and
Hi Lon,
Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is the one who posted
it, but I also feel that way.
The shots that thrilled me when I first tried out my new ZX-5n with its
equally new FA 35/2 last Fall are embarassing now. However, I'm keeping
them on the web, so I can have something to
It doesn't have to have anything to do with PUG, all someone needs is some
webspace and a little time and they could create any gallery they feel
like. This would probably be a much better idea than to invade the PUG for
a month.
Todd
At 08:04 PM 6/3/01 -0400, you wrote:
Bill has raised some
Either I'm confused or maybe we need to talk about what OT (off topic)
messages are.
I've just read handful of messages marked OT whose subjects were about
Pentax bodies, Pentax lenses, photo technique, film choice, etc..
Why would these posts be considered OT?
Dan (scratchin my head) Scott
I haven't seen any delivery failure
notices...however, three of my messages took over 6
hours to show up and one never made it at all.
Nothing vital you understand, but those kind of delays
make it difficult to sustain a thread.
Wondering if this thread will ever get up???Bob
--- Gerald F.
Collin Brendemuehl opines:
So much good stuff. Just a few comments.
...
Light Space #9, by Gerald Cermak
Makes me want to watch The Sound of Music
one more time.
If this is a compliment, thanks. What part of the image gives you the sense
of The Sound of Music? For me, the shot
Must be true luv if you let her use your 85/1.8. I like both, but am partial
to the first.
Regards,
Bob...
--
Those who say that life is worth living at any cost
have already written an epitaph of infamy,
for there is no cause and no person
that they will not
My son, Steven, made the original posting on this thread.
Actually, this is physically identical to the Takumar-A
except for the label, of course. Note the aperture A
setting colors. SMC lenses have white letters and a green A
Taks have green letters and a red A. The Takumar-A 28/2.8
has the
78 matches
Mail list logo
