I think that most folks on this list *assume* that the primary interest of
the other members of the list is photography, either as their main or only
hobby or for photography commercial purposes. This is a *false* assumption.
I enjoy photography and probably have $15k or so in Pentax equipment. My
On Saturday evening, I used my new (to me) AF360-FGZ to take some
pictures at our Christmas party. When I got back the prints, the
majority of the photos had at least one person with their eyes closed.
The house was fairly dark and the revelers had imbibed quite a bit of
Christmas cheer by
Well Mr. Blakely, you definitely have the bigger virtual penis.
Your self serving factoids are as valid as self serving factoids
can be.
Regards
William Robb
Keith Whaley wrote:
You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!)
You're showing your age, sir...
but if you drive sanely, it ought to be a ton of fun!
Yes, but the sense of self-satisfaction is greater
when driving sanely in a car capable of insanity, no?
Anybody race these things?
I also have many interests more important to me than photography: my family, my
dogs, music, movies, collecting political campaign buttons and coins of imperial
Russia, politic, religion, etc. I don't, however, presume to bore my Pentax
friends on this list with my enthusiasms for all these
I wanted to stay out of this but...
I'm on the pro side of this thread, but let's face facts. Regardless of any
posts made here, no one is going to change their opinion of the other side
of this debate. Therefore, LET THIS DAMNED THREAD DIE!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: William
Just tried 'em from here and they're working OK. SOmething in between may be
not working. Try again in a few minutes.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/mx_6-1.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/mx_6-2.jpg
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My ISP's (Netscape) connction attempts were refused by
Hi Michael...
I don't have direct experience with the AF360, but here's my theory on the
cause: Camera flashes cause most folks to blink. Hey, it's a natural
reaction to a very intense light. Usually, by the time a person blinks the
exposure has been completed. So it's not a matter of *if*
It is a Smart car, sold under the brand Smart and marketed by Mercedes Benz
(it think) here in Europe. There was some involvement with Swatch, the swiss
brand selling funny plastic watches, but I don't know the extent of it.
In overcrowded towns here like Rome they're sold like hot cakes altough
Okay. A little time is a common fix for recalcitrant URLs...
I did see the photos. Veery nice indeed.
Were it black, I'd have snapped at it. ;^)
As it is, I just got my first MX body about 2 weeks ago, and I'm still
wringing it out.
I know the one I have will not be my last, as I must have a
Michael,
Having used 360's extensively, the mode you are probably referring to
is P-TTL where a pre-flash for measurements is taken. In practice it
looks like one really long flash rather than two short ones.
I have not really noticed an excessive amount of shut eyes due to
blinking on hundreds
Stephen Moore wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!)
You're showing your age, sir...
And proudly so! smile
Those were the days of raw racing, and tough race-car drivers.
I'll drop the subject on that note, but these two men alone
represented just
Nor do I, but no one is lying about your other interests in a manner that
accumulates to a potential for having those interests taken away.
Regards,
Bob
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!
- Benjamin
Cesar posted:
I travelled to Italy with my mother and
sister two years ago. We made it to Capri.
Cesar:
Where HAVENT you been?
Come to think of it, I'm not sure I want to know. I'm already jealous of your
well-travelled
status.
Bob wrote:
I belong to 7 lists
associated with this. Nowhere on these lists has anyone ever disparaged
photography or Pentax let alone do it using falsehoods, lies, untruths,
Of course not. They don't discuss pentax or photography but Guns. Can you please have
decency and consideration to
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Flavio Minelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:15 AM
--
--
-- Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
--
-- ...
--
-- This was back when my scanning capabilities were poor, but
-- you can have a
-- look at
Of course it's self serving! It's clearly also serving of a fairly large
community, and specifically by one of that community who is affected.
Everyone who wants to preserve some part of liberty for himself is serving
of others as well as himself. Your whine is like saying that any member of a
How can I FORCE (by pin shorting or some other means)
the 28-70 lens to move?
Collin
Forget it.
I got it to work.
Collin
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:47:45 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KAF forced focus movement
How can I FORCE (by pin shorting or some other means)
the 28-70 lens to move?
Collin
Bruce,
With the ZX-L, I cannot select TTL, my only choices are A, M and P-TTL.
I used fast film (Portra 800).
Could you offer a little guidance about camera settings with flash? In
this instance, I was using the FA 50mm f/1.4.
I used the Program AE (a smiley face on the ZX-L), and the camera
Michael,
Try about 5.6 with the aperture ring. Leave the rest of the camera in
program and I think that it will not set the shutter below 1/30 and
not greater than flash synch speed.
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 12:13:45 PM, you wrote:
MC Bruce,
MC With the ZX-L, I cannot select TTL,
Bruce,
Manually setting the aperture at f/5.6, the shutter speed doesn't go
lower than 45 in either Program or TV. Would it be better to set the
shutter speed at 30 in Manual mode to get a little more ambient light?
Michael
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Michael,
Try about 5.6 with the aperture
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:00 PM, Michael Cross wrote:
On Saturday evening, I used my new (to me) AF360-FGZ to take some
pictures at our Christmas party. When I got back the prints, the
majority of the photos had at least one person with their eyes closed.
The house was fairly
Bruce,
I just tried selecting the red-eye reduction mode on the camera. That mode
gives a noticeably earlier pre-flash about a second prior to the shot. I
wonder if the red eye mode would allow people to adjust to the flash and
get their eyes back open before the shot?
Michael
Bruce Dayton
Sounds good Jeff.Let us know your thoughts:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:59:33 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Hanukah Christmas gift all-in-one
Today I received the Minolta Spotmeter F in the mail. It's in great
Michael,
No, let it go. The camera believes that you shouldn't hand hold it
lower than 1/45 with your 35mm lens. That should be ok for the time
being. Do a few test shots there and see how they turn out. You
might try it on a few who didn't blink and a few who did.
The other thing to try is
Michael,
I wouldn't try the red-eye reduction mode simply because too many
people let their guard down after the first flash and you end up more
often with the after shot look.
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 12:39:39 PM, you wrote:
MC Bruce,
MC I just tried selecting the red-eye
As far as the PDML goes, Bill,same old,same old:)
However we did get a new kitten.Not sure if we should name it
Wheatfield or MJ.
(Sorry guys,just to temptingVBG
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lines.
It's good to be back. Have I missed anything
The problem is that in Av the camera ZX-L chooses shortest handholdable
speed (1/45s for 50mm,1/30s for 35mm and so on)and in shutter priority the
camera chooses the largest aperature for the lens. This can not be forgone
by setting the aperature on the lens since this automatically sets the
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Michael,
I wouldn't try the red-eye reduction mode simply because too many
people let their guard down after the first flash and you end up more
often with the after shot look.
Do they also have a sudden urge to have a smoke? g
keith
Bruce
Tuesday, December
Then what the f*ck were they doing it here with constant posts of lies?
I waited, biting my lip, for more than 40 posts on this subject before
observing that all the Stop posting that folks had begun fighting among
themselves. YOU pissed on me for that! Well I got bloody tired of it about
the
Bob Blakely wrote:
I think that most folks on this list *assume* that the primary interest of
the other members of the list is photography, either as their main or only
hobby or for photography commercial purposes. This is a *false* assumption.
So what. This isn't the GunDML- so please take
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Ken Archer wrote:
Keep looking. They are available. I have been watching ebay for a
couple of years for a K3.5/35. I found one a month ago on ebay for $30
in mint condition. Only the plastic cap had a little silver lettering
rubbed off on it.
On
--- Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, QEW is short for Queen Elizabeth Way. You're right about speeds
in California. Last summer I drove to California, and typical speeds on I-5
were 75-90 mph, but almost no-one travelled any faster. Have you driven in
Europe?
Nope, never driven
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:54 AM, Cotty wrote:
A Smart Police car! Is that an oxymoron? Assuming cops travel in pairs,
where do they stow the handcuffed burglar?
Cotty
They put him under the hood and let the hamster take a break?
Dan Scott
--- Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, QEW is short for Queen Elizabeth Way.
Oops, I stand corrected. I asked the same question myself one snowy winter in
Toronto. I guess there must've been a snow ball or a muffler over my ears that
day g.
Pat in SF
Dan,
My experience with Max 400/800 has been poor. Pretty good color - bad
contrast (too contrasty) and crappy grain.
I know that Tom V. has not had good luck with Portra 800 - so now I
have to pull out the proofs from the few rolls of it that I have shot.
In looking them over, the contrast is
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:54 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Howdy, Peter,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 04:20:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say generally that mirrors are never quite going to perform
like
regular lenses, however if you can provide a stable platform that
will help
Dan,
Portra 800 has become my default indoor available light/flash film. I
use 160 NC outdoors and Portra 800 indoors. I acutally prefer 800 to
the 400NC (35mm) which I really don't like at all. I am stunned that
this is an 800 speed film. I actually shoot it at 640, but it has a
great
--- Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, can anyone tell me the film margin code for Fuji
Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Royal Gold 200 film?
Keith-
The X-TRA 400 reads Fuji S-400.
Hope this helps,
Pat in SF
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Hum...? Same old polite friendly Pal, I see. You know something, I believe
you have a RIGHT to have a different opinion than me. In fact that has been
my argument in this whole thread, people have a right to their opinion, and
to express it. The opposition is that certain people should shut up. So
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Just looked at the Fuji NPZ 800 that I have shot for comparison. Grain
looks better than Superia 800, color is a bit on the cool side (that
is what I usually get from Fuji and my lab). Slightly contrasty but
not bad. I would say
What is Portra 400UC? Portra 400VC is my favorite color negative film,
particularly with the 6x7 where speed is a factor. I've even used it for
some portraits instead of the NC. But I'm curious about UC. What is it?
Paul
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:36 pm, Bruce Dayton wrote:
So, to
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:59 PM, Michael Cross wrote:
Dan,
Portra 800 has become my default indoor available light/flash film. I
use 160 NC outdoors and Portra 800 indoors. I acutally prefer 800 to
the 400NC (35mm) which I really don't like at all. I am stunned that
this is
I'll bet that's true! You need a longer wheelbase (vs. track
dimensions) to aid stability.
Still, for 'around town' it seems hard to beat!
You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!) but if you drive
sanely, it ought to be a ton of fun!
keith whaley
Keith,
You must be an old timer.
Pat wrote:
--- Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, can anyone tell me the film margin code for Fuji
Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Royal Gold 200 film?
Keith-
The X-TRA 400 reads Fuji S-400.
Hope this helps,
Pat in SF
Close enough, Pat. I found the roll I
I wanted o get a MZ-3 as my first Pentax camera but did try the MZ-S for an
hour...too bad
I will have only one question : does the MZ-S need to beep whenever it gets
the AF blocked ?
grr in France MZ-S are 300 Euros costier than in Germany ( 950 Euros ) ..
i shall sell one or two Nikon AI-s
I use a lot of Portra 160NC in 35mm, but I tend to use the 400 versions,
both NC and VC in 6x7. In part for better depth of field but also for
higher shutter speeds that negate any vibration problems. I generally
expose the 160NC at iso 100 and the 400NC at 300.
Paul
Dan Scott wrote:
On
-Original Message-
From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Related question--Portra 800? Anyone have any comments
about it?
Yes - yuck.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
What is Portra 400UC?
It's a new version. UC = Ultra Color.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
That's easy, professional cameras are the ones professionals use, amateurs
use amateur
cameras.
At 05:24 PM 12/10/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I've got one! I'm still not too clear on the difference between professional
and amateur cameras ... (running and ducking)
- Original Message -
From:
Impressive, Jeff! I'd love to have shared that!
I was the worst kind of sports car snob back in the mid-'50s.
My first was a Triumph TR-3. Changed the plugs (literally!) and raced
it on Lake Erie's Pelee Island, Northern Ohio's Race Around the
Houses, in Put-in-Bay, in Lake Erie, put on by the
You DO have a way with words, Pål.
keith
Pål Jensen wrote:
Graywolf wrote:
2--They find a sense of community here
that satisfies a need in their life. If you restrict what they can talk
about to strickly Pentax and photography, the second group is going to leave
the list.
Well the 30mm is more of a substitute, and a much superior one at that, for
one of the K or M 28mm lenses. That said I can only second the assessment
that this is a great lens. It may be overlooked due to it's relative rarity.
At 09:36 AM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he still a
pro? And would the camera he uses be a pro camera? What if he uses the same
camera to take those snapshots as he does whilst working? Would it only be a pro
camera while on the job, but an amateur camera on Sunday
No, American police officer would be caught dead in that, (but it is so
damned cute).
At 10:03 AM 12/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
reading this thread I remembered the smallest police car I ever saw. I
was in Capri, the famous island in front of Sorrento and Naples where
VIPs and generally
They must tie them on top like a trophy buck.
At 01:54 PM 12/10/2002 +, you wrote:
A Smart Police car! Is that an oxymoron? Assuming cops travel in pairs,
where do they stow the handcuffed burglar?
Cotty
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
frank,
Much simpler than you think. 5FPS = Pro. Nikon = Pro. Canon = Pro.
Pentax = Amateur. Minolta = Amateur.
Of course, this only works with 35mm because those are the only pro
cameras. What's medium format anyway?
VBG
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 7:39:17 PM, you wrote:
ft Ah,
Only here could someone take a flip remark and complicate it so. (Someone
is thinking
way too much about this). I think the short answer is yes.
At 10:39 PM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he
still a
pro? And would the
There are so many great photography Web sites around that are not strictly
Pentax related. I'm wondering if we should put together a list of the users'
favourite (non-pentax photography web sites
Could be a good resource and we could certainly kill some serious time
checking them out.
Vic
You can easily turn off the beeper if you wish. The MZ-S is more expensive
in Canada than in the US (grrr), but I bought mine here anyway, and I'm very
happy with it.
Pat White
Oops forgot to start it off. I like to go to
http://www.naturepix.com/
just to check out the galleries once in a while
Vic
Hello nice people,
I am getting mixed information on the ZX-Ls autofocus system. Is it a 6 point
autofocus system like the MZ-S or only 3 like the ZX5n, or, none of the above??
Thanks,
RObert
___
GO.com Mail
http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_specs.cfm?productid=01449
regards,
Alan Chan
I am getting mixed information on the ZX-Ls autofocus system. Is it a 6
point autofocus system like the MZ-S or only 3 like the ZX5n, or, none of
the above??
Doug Franklin a écrit:
Hi Alek,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:13:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the price of such adapter AF?
In Europa (web on Germany):
http://www.fotokoch.de
193 (193 $)
Michel
I have 2 changing tents. One is small and I take with me everywhere. The
other is large and measures about 600mm X 600mm and use for loading tanks,
film inserts and film holders. It has a rubberised insert and long sleeve
access. I can't tell you the manufacturer as I have had it for 20 years.
What is the price of such adapter AF?
Alek
Uytkownik Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hi Bill,
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 16:03:53 -0800, Bill Lawlor wrote:
I saw something recently on the Pentax.com site about an autofocus adapter
to get AF with manual lenses. Now I can't find it again. Is
Hi,
What does exactly harsh bokeh mean? I see my K105/2.8 is very sharp (Velvia) and
wonder what you mean saying about harsh bokeh..How does it perform if compared with
Nikkor 105/2.5?
Alek
Uytkownik Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:41 PM, Fred wrote:
Hello Jeff
I'm sorry to learn of the dreadful service you received from Pentax UK. I'm afraid my
story is no better. Pentax UK had my recently serviced LX in for a very specific
repair, they said their repair involved servicing again as that's how they do it
(dismantle and check all components
But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem?How to
describe bokeh in other words?
Alek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Yep, but at the same time, the lens is reknown to have a harsh
bokeh. Which is not important to all of us and certainly not to
N*k*n users.
Yes,
You prefer A50/1.4 or FA 50/1.4 to other 50mm from different companies?
Alek
Uytkownik Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
What about K35/2.0 and FA35/2.0? Those three lenses are considered to be the
best PEntax 35mm lens. Which one do you recommend?
Alek
Some people believe that A50/1.7
Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which is the
best?
Alek
Uytkownik Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 08:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA35/2.0 which is probably very good.
Alek
No _probably_ about it Alek. Just,
So it is better to find FA 35/2.0, or old K 35mm I hope
Alek
Uytkownik Pal Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek wrote:
And it was M35/2.8 lens for sure? test was done about 15 year ago I think.
Even better than Zeiss? I asked since many people believe K 35mm lenses are
alegedly much better.
Most manufacturers build excellent 50mm f1.4 lenses. They have to because it
is the single focal length that most people stress. However, it is the
complete lot that really matters and, on a whole, the Pentax prime lenses
are unmatched IMHO.
Between the A and F/FA, they are designed for different
Only if you need auto focus. The 35 f3.5 is in a league of its own - try and
buy one in the K mount!
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why?
Is FA 35/2.0
I do not need AF! I just want to have great 35mm lens. I own M35/2.8 and probably K
35mm are better... Any opinion?
Alek
Uytkownik Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Only if you need auto focus. The 35 f3.5 is in a league of its own - try and
buy one in the K mount!
Bob Rapp
- Original
Dnia 10-12-2002 o godz. 10:03 Flavio Minelli napisal:
Hi all,
reading this thread I remembered the smallest police car I
ever saw.
In Poland they also have a small Police car. It's not as small
as yours though. It's meant to transport police dogs (K-9 unit).
Not a very good photo is here:
And optically which is better?A or FA?
Alek
Uytkownik Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Most manufacturers build excellent 50mm f1.4 lenses. They have to because it
is the single focal length that most people stress. However, it is the
complete lot that really matters and, on a whole, the Pentax
on 07.12.02 17:38, Joseph Tainter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
which are
Hi,
Timothy Sherburne wrote:
I'm not sure of the exact demonstration Boris mentions, but he
refers to
either gas-powered microturbine or fuel cell technology.
In either case, the
fluid is simply methanol or a similar fuel. Fuel cells
have been around
for some time but
You know, I had not even noticed these new products. I just looked on
photozone and you are right - they do look very similar to Sigma
versions. And the 200-500 looks very much like a sigma, although they
don't make one in this range I think.
This would be fascinating if Sigma and Tamron have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.So where is the problem?
How to describe bokeh in other words?
Alek
First, you have to learn what bokeh is.
A very good article on bokeh is located at:
http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf
Keith Whaley
Happy birthday, Ann. I hope you have an absolutely wonderful day and a
really great and exciting year!!
I think your calendar is beautiful. I can recognize some of the scenes (I
think).
Kathy Leickly
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I think. I nearly only
shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did not observed the problem.
Do you have this lens?
Alek
Uytkownik Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I shot some portraits and
As Bob Rapp said, a Pentax-M 35mm f/3.5 is a superior lens, and better
than most other 35 mm lenses from anyone.
That is HIS opinion. It is also my opinion.
How much superior is totally dependend on what the user does with it.
There are several features or qualities about lenses and how they
on 10.12.02 12:32, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I had not even noticed these new products. I just looked on
photozone and you are right - they do look very similar to Sigma
versions. And the 200-500 looks very much like a sigma, although they
don't make one in this
Do you know if Nikkor 105/2.5 is better/worse than Pentax 105?
Alek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Thanks!
But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I think. I nearly only
shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did not observed the problem.
Do you have this lens?
Alek
Uytkownik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!
But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I think.
I nearly only shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did not observed the problem.
Do you have this lens?
Alek
No, I don't.
I was only talking about bokeh, not about how good or not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if Nikkor 105/2.5 is better/worse than Pentax 105?
Alek
Me? No.
I don't own nor use Nikons, so I don't use Nikkor lenses.
Perhaps someone else on the list does.
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa3:
Thanks!
But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give
I have a friend with the M35/2.8 and I have the Super Takumar 35/3.5 which is supposed
to be the same optically as the K35/3.5 (except no SMC) and the Super Tak is
definitely a better lens, though the M35 is not bad. If you can find the K35 at a good
price, I would pick it up. I'm still
Hi Alek,
Bokeh is how the areas of the picture that are not in focus are rendered. Whether a
lens has good bokeh or not is generally a personal preference. Most people prefer a
less distracting background than the pictures that are shown in Fred's link below.
I have this same lens and have
Gosh, it's a FIAT 500! I hope they don't plan to put big german sheperds
in there...
Ciao, Flavio
It was K35/3.5 I think.
I see what you mean it is difficult to say it is the best lens etc.
But taking into consideration only sharpness, resolution and color rendition one can
show which is better. I know the price of FA 35/2.0 ( do not know average price of
K35/2.0) but I just wanted to know
Which brings up a point.
Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line pro lenses which I would
assume are at least designed in-house, can you
on 10.12.02 13:42, T Rittenhouse at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line pro lenses which I would
assume
I firmly believe that it is aging the stuff in oak barrels that caused those
delusions (Pentax DSLR in this case) we don't have that problem with the
plane ol' corn liqueur we drink over here.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL
Beats chasing thiefs on foot or bicycle.
Jeff.
PS: looks similar to the Smart car I've seen in Ontario.
- Original Message -
From: Flavio Minelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:03 AM
Subject: Talking about tiny cars...
Hi all,
Is there a reliable mail order source for hoods for the M 50/1.7 and M
28/2.8?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
So good luck in looking for K35/3.5 lens. I also plan to replace my M35/2.8 with any K
35mm or even FA35/2.0 in future.
Alek
Uytkownik William Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
I have a friend with the M35/2.8 and I have the Super Takumar 35/3.5 which is
supposed to be the same optically as the
Flavio,
Your account brought back memories. I travelled to Italy with my mother and
sister two years ago. We made it to Capri.
This was back when my scanning capabilities were poor, but you can have a
look at http://cesar_abdul.homestead.com/Italia_Capri.html for a few shots
on the Isle.
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
