On 2/4/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Could we, perhaps, widen the scope a little?
Nice one.
Needs a co-ordinator to receive jpegs and do some printing. I'm pretty
full up here. Any takers?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Ooh, I like it. The clouds all grayish and the strong greens together
really make it. Nice shootin', Tex!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, April 2, 2005, 11:47:02 PM, you wrote:
MA It's been like summer here this past week, but the week before we had a
MA series of storms come through. At
- Original Message -
From: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Doug, for clarifying. My thoughts are with Don, i sincerely
hope that
he has the time of his life on GFM this year. I think we should make
a sort
of picture book for him on our gathering in London.
Excellent idea,
Yes, that's what they call it in Germany too, in german of course. It's
the fabric kites are made of, I can get it here from a shop that sells
stuff for making kites. Lots of colours, the other day white was sold
out but they said they'd order some. Black is also available, and the
stuff is
Thanks Jens. I'll try and post some pics in the near future.
Cheers
Shaun
Jens Bladt said:
Welcome back, Shaun.
Now you can post pics of you baby boy :-)
Time is running fast when you have kids. My baby boy is now 14!
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lovely shot, Boris.
insider comment
The colours suit you... :-)
/insider comment
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 7:11 PM
Subject: PAW: Poppy Field
Hi!
I like it, Marco ... it captures a typical scene in the Bay Area. Nothing
spectacular, but gives a nice sense of what it's like to live here. The
clouds and fog draping over the hills are so typical, as, of course, are
the hills. The trees at the bottom nicely balance the clouds at the top,
Marco Alpert wrote:
It's been like summer here this past week, but the week before we had a
series of storms come through. At my wife's behest, I took a few shots
from our front yard during a lull. Not my usual subject matter (color
and landscape and all), but anyway:
I'm afraid not. It's located further down on the MZ-S although the edge of it
isn't far off. There is a little red LED that comes on at the position of the
red dot on the body, but it's completely pointless as it doesn't have anything
corresponding to it on the lens, other than the red dot, and
Hi folks,
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/kb_windlass
This is a windlass used for hoisting up one end of the 90 beam engine
at the Kew Bridge Steam Museum in London.
Pentax Super Program, MC-Mir 47k 20mm/2.5 @f4ish, no idea about shutter
speed, Ilford Delta 400, 1:25 Rodinal.
All comments
Hi!
My k28/3.5 is sharpest one stop closed and f8 is little worse than wide
open.
Then perhaps it was optimized this way? It is of course something I
did not know. I've no prime lens of 28 mm focal length - only wide end
of my FA 28-70/4...
--
Boris
Hi!
Recent talk about 28/3.5 and 16-45 zoom performance got me confused.
My (probably very much Boris-the-average) belief was that most lenses
are optimized at 3 or so stops from their widest aperture. So, for
most f/2.8 lenses it would be f/8 or thereabouts.
Is it right thing to assume? Or
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
i shoot it mostly at f11-f13 for DOF reasons. on a tripod of course, and
frequently with one ND filter or another to get the long shutter speeds i
like.
Yes, I remember you saying that. Is that to achieve frothy fluid
movement or do you do it for
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See if you can get some silver lame fabric.
It will be silver on one side, and black on the other.
Makes an ideal material for a soft box.
OTOH, I'm not a big fan of soft boxes...
I am making a reflector, or series of
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, William Robb wrote:
I try not to work with scanned film.
very useful stuff snipped
Thanks William.
Kostas
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, MikeM wrote:
Lately I have been using it mainly for trying to get close to birds, though
it has been inadequate for many. Over the last few weeks I have been using
it to photograph ships at our local port because the public is excluded from
the wharves so I have to make do
Is this lens realy this bad or is it just mine?
Se test shots:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p13380532.html
Scroll down and aclick Full Size to closer examine
This is at F. 2.8
Click next to see F. 4 and F. 5.6
Comments are welcome.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens
Hard to tell from my monitor,but these were taken froam recently purchased A 28
f2.8.
Althought i have not printed any out yet,they look good to me on the screen.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Wagg%20Road%20Open%202005/
Dave
Is this
Hi folks,
one sometimes reads about 'stuck pixels' (at least I think that's what you
call tiny bright dots that are found on the same place on every image). How
common are they on the *istD?
Peter
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Recent talk about 28/3.5 and 16-45 zoom performance got me confused.
My (probably very much Boris-the-average) belief was that most lenses
are optimized at 3 or so stops from their widest aperture. So, for
most f/2.8 lenses it would be f/8 or thereabouts.
Is it right
Hi gang,
With all the interesting tests performed with the new wide angle DA
lenses
to the older workhorses of the Pentax lineup, I felt like it was my
turn
to contribute to the pool.
I bought the DA 16-45 for my trip to Israel about a month ago, and
found the
zoom range so convenient that it
Very nice. Looks like you nailed that honker. The geese may be a pain
in the butt, but they're quite beautiful in flight. And they're slow
enough to get a shot off. Good job on that focus.
Paul
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:19 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Since Ole' Steady Stenquist is showing us all how to
Welcome back, Shaun. Let's see some pics of the little guy. You must
have several thousand by now :-).
Paul
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:27 AM, Shaun Canning wrote:
He's already got us wrapped around his little finger Boris. Talking and
walking can only be more fun...
Cheers
Shaun
Boris Liberman said:
Gorgeous. Love those clouds drifting into the hills. If that's the view
from your front yard, you should be shooting a lot of landscapes g.
On Apr 3, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
It's been like summer here this past week, but the week before we had
a series of storms come through. At
Lenses are optimised for what aperture they are optimised. This might
be even wide open.
In theory, lens is sharpest wide open, and then looses sharpness as it
is stopped down.
In real world, that is rarely achievable, perhaps with the computer
chip engraving lenses (and usually only for single
Good work. The 31 Limited is obviously superb, even at 2.8. I'm
surprised at how well the DA 16-45 stacks up at f8. It appears to be
better than both the 20/2.8 and the FA* 28-70 and a near match for the
31 Limited. It's also decent at F4. On the basis of this, I'm thinking
I don't need the
Thanks, Dave
Were any of these shot at f2.8 or f4? That's where mine is realy not sharp.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2005 09:15
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
a fair number my subjects involve flowing water. even when they don't, i'm
usually on a tripod anyway, using levels to ensure an even horizon. or, i
have one of my long lenses on @400mm, sometimes with an extender. i use long
exposures on some landscapes to produce blurry trees and other such
No, it's not easy to judge CA from these crops. However, they are at
1:1 ratio, so whatever one can see is for real. Actually, the DA was
the only lens in this comparison to show any CA of significance. You
can see it as a purple fringing on the 20mm shots. What's surprising
is that there's
Mark Roberts wrote:
Don Nelson is living proof that the term Southern Gentleman has not
yet become an oxymoron: He's a class act through and through. He prefers
to keep a low profile, but he himself has always been one of the best,
if little-mentioned, reasons for attending the Grandfather
An excellent comparison Jostein, much more 'scientific' than mine.
2 questions:
1. How did you create the .jpgs for the individual table cells,
such as this one: http://www.oksne.net/tests/watest/1645-28.jpg
I can never seem to keep my crops identical like this.
2. When you shot the FA 28-70 at
Hmmm, even with my reading glasses on I don't see anything that I
would call fringing on most of the shots. I see some minor difference
in color rendering. The only place I see something that I would call
fringing is on the FA 20/2.8 at f22 and f8. It's somewhat evident on
the upper branches
Don,
1. In the photoshop settings, set units rulers to show as pixels.
Then you can use the info pane to gauge the exact size of your
selection. Once the size of the selection is right, it's easy to
position the marching ants to match your previous selections.
Actually I discovered this method
I just remembered, that when I repaired this lens (the focus helicoid was
out of proper adjustment), the front lens(es) were loose. I didn't check
their position and just tightened the front lens element.
So, just now I took the front lenses (two) out again, cleaned them and put
them back. This
Thanks Jostein.
If I get time I'm going to find a nice brick wall somewhere
today and retest the DA, the 28/3.5 and 2 or 3 others.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:51 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another
That's cool Jens!
I'll be testing the A 28/2.8 against the M 28/3.5 if I get time
today. I hope mine is a good as yours.
The A 28 doesn't have a very good reputation for sharpness,
yours seems to do quite well.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The only time I shoot at less than 300 with it is when the subject is
something like a ship and it is too close to fit enough in the frame. I
would like something longer than 300, especially with birds. The Sigma 28-80
100-300 came with the MZ50. The shots taken with the 300 seem better than
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme is Camera. Pictures that include a
camera?
Or maybe taken with a camera? g
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Dear Confused (grin),
Otimised is prehaps the wrong word. Economized is better. What happens is
diffraction gets worse at smaller apertures. Most other aberations get worse at
larger apertures. There is nothing that can be done about diffraction it is a
basic law of physics, but the others can
Jostein wrote:
Don,
1. In the photoshop settings, set units rulers to show as pixels.
Then you can use the info pane to gauge the exact size of your
selection. Once the size of the selection is right, it's easy to
position the marching ants to match your previous selections. Actually
I
from what is posted, i can't see anything that i can safely conclude is
chromatic aberration. i don't expect any of the posted images to really show
significant CA anyway since the contrast isn't too high. of Jostein's test
lenses, i have the DA 16-45, the FA* 28-70, and the 31 Limited. i have
This is a 500% enlarged crop from a shot taken with the D at
2 seconds with a lens cap on.
It's quite visible at 100% if against a dark background.
This is the first time I've noticed it and I don't see any others.
It bleeds into the surrounding pixels.
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Pixel.jpg
- Original Message -
From: Peter Smekal
Subject: Stuck pixels on the *istD
Hi folks,
one sometimes reads about 'stuck pixels' (at least I think that's what you
call tiny bright dots that are found on the same place on every image).
How
common are they on the *istD?
They are pretty
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Where have all the Pimples gone? (was RE: Need the little white
bubble for some M lenses- Help)
which is:
*ist D, *ist DS, *ist ???
The original K-mount design allowed the user to mount a lens without looking
at the camera.
If you put
A pediatric oncologist checking in here. Hodgkins is
pretty much the same in kids and big people (unlike a
number of other diseases).
The large majority of patients with Stage III Hodgkins
disease are cured. It ain't fun, but it usually ain't
fatal.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: Is this a hot pixel?
This is a 500% enlarged crop from a shot taken with the D at
2 seconds with a lens cap on.
It's quite visible at 100% if against a dark background.
This is the first time I've noticed it and I don't see any others.
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme is Camera. Pictures that include a
camera?
Or maybe taken with a camera? g
Or
Here's a rather nice freebie image browser for .jpg, .tif and
others if anyone needs one.
http://tinyurl.com/5zfav
Don
Thanks William, but now my D isn't *perfect* anymore!
AH!!! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 10:08 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is this a hot pixel?
- Original Message -
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 17.15 skrev Mark Roberts:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to
pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme is Camera. Pictures that include a
Cotty, don't let us down!
You're in the right location to get a good camera photo.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 17.15 skrev Mark Roberts:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to
pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme
On Apr 2, 2005 9:26 PM, Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kind of good. I like the strong graphic lines.
I like the mix of angles and the distributton of
light and dark seems pretty good.
I'm less enthused about the degree of out of focusness
of the players head/face.
Given the
On Apr 3, 2005 11:07 AM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A pediatric oncologist checking in here. Hodgkins is
pretty much the same in kids and big people (unlike a
number of other diseases).
The large majority of patients with Stage III Hodgkins
disease are cured. It ain't fun, but it
Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A pediatric oncologist checking in here. Hodgkins is
pretty much the same in kids and big people (unlike a
number of other diseases).
The large majority of patients with Stage III Hodgkins
disease are cured. It ain't fun, but it usually ain't
fatal.
Ah,
Don Sanderson wrote:
Here's a rather nice freebie image browser for .jpg, .tif and
others if anyone needs one.
http://tinyurl.com/5zfav
Don
Providing you have/use a Window operating system, that is.
It apparently is NOT available for Macs...
keith whaley
On Apr 3, 2005 12:03 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The phrase It ain't fun, but it usually ain't fatal might also be
applied to Bill Owens' cherry-flavored beer;snip
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175882size=lg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
On 3/4/05, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
It apparently is NOT available for Macs...
Speaks volumes to me.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Apr 3, 2005 11:02 AM, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing you have/use a Window operating system, that is.
It apparently is NOT available for Macs...
keith whaley
Or Linux.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
On Apr 3, 2005 11:39 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or taken in a room?
That was obscure
Really? I thought it was quite lucid. ;-)
You must stop.
Right now. vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 3/4/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're in the right location to get a good camera photo.
Har!!! Yes indeed.
http://www.britainexpress.com/cities/oxford/radcliffe.htm
http://www.bluffton.edu/~sullivanm/england/oxford/gibbs/radcliffe.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
In addition to being a sucker for photos of women, I'm also a sucker
for stage photography. I do like this one quite a bit. I think the
shadow fits well, since stage lighting is often harsh and very
directional, even if it is a product of your flash light. The
out-of-focus face and the in-focus
On 3/4/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, don't let us down!
You're in the right location to get a good camera photo.
It's too obvious now - I'll have to do something else. Which reminds me -
I haven't contributed to the PUG for ages - I think I might follow
Steve's lead and
On Apr 3, 2005 2:19 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Ole' Steady Stenquist is showing us all how to wield a 400mm, I
thought I would try my hand at it. I don't think I can hold as still
as him, but I was happy with this result.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6 SD
ISO 400,
On 3/4/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
The phrase It ain't fun, but it usually ain't fatal might also be
applied to Bill Owens' cherry-flavored beer;
ROTFL!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005 11:39 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or taken in a room?
That was obscure
Really? I thought it was quite lucid. ;-)
You must stop.
What? But this topic lens itself so well to this kind of humor!
--
Mark Roberts
Osama 1, America 0.
We've got the same sort of scumbags over here taking away our civil rights
in the name of security.
John
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:40:55 -0800, David Volkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yep (if anyone is interested his story is here:
http://69.93.170.43/index.php).
I
My main reason for owning WinDoze?
Freebies! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Scott Loveless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:18 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Free image browser
On Apr 3, 2005 11:02 AM, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They're called Canada Geese because we're optimistic.
They might get the hint and move! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:26 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Flying Rat
On Apr 3, 2005 2:19
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
The phrase It ain't fun, but it usually ain't fatal might also be
applied to Bill Owens' cherry-flavored beer;
ROTFL!
I suppose it also might be applied to my MacRae Peak hikes on
Grandfather Mountain.
--
That was so bad it made me shutter!
D
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:42 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Camera PUG
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005 11:39 AM, Mark Roberts
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme is Camera. Pictures that include a
camera?
Or maybe taken with a camera? g
Steven
Rick Womer wrote:
A pediatric oncologist checking in here. Hodgkins is
pretty much the same in kids and big people (unlike a
number of other diseases).
The large majority of patients with Stage III Hodgkins
disease are cured. It ain't fun, but it usually ain't
fatal.
Rick
That is
DagT wrote:
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 17.15 skrev Mark Roberts:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to
pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline. I notice the theme is Camera.
Thanks, Don. I'm looking forward to you rtests.
Do you know how well the Pentax-K 2.8/28mm is rated?
Or the Pentax-M 2.8/24mm ?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2005
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005 11:39 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or taken in a room?
That was obscure
Really? I thought it was quite lucid. ;-)
You must stop.
What? But this topic lens itself so well to this
Don,
You may not want to hear this, but speaking as someone who engineered
products in the semiconductor manufacturing field for a number of years, I
can say that there is no such thing as perfection in imaging arrays. All of
the ccd sites vary at least a little bit compared to each other, and
Very interesting, Boris.
Yes, it seems the M 3.5/28mm lens is doing better wide open, but the DA is
doing a lot better stopped down.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april
Or taken in private. What a rich ambiguous language.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Mark Roberts wrote:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to pretend
that is
Well, that is very good news.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Rick Womer wrote:
A pediatric oncologist checking in here. Hodgkins is
pretty much the same in kids and big people (unlike a
number of other diseases).
The large
You are generally right, and I personally have yet to see a lens that is not
better when stopped down somewhat. A few factors that come into play - the
speed of the original lens is one (stop down an f5.6 les 3 stops and you are
at f16, a point where diffraction might start to impede
You´d better open up.
DagT
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 18.40 skrev Don Sanderson:
That was so bad it made me shutter!
D
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:42 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Camera PUG
frank theriault
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 18.41 skrev Ann Sanfedele:
DagT wrote:
På 3. apr. 2005 kl. 17.15 skrev Mark Roberts:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that my life is calming down a bit (or at least I'm going to
pretend
that is the case) I'm really going to try not to miss the next PUG
deadline.
Hi;
I opened up my MX winder hoping it would open up the battery
compartment and let me clean out the foam gunk that was in there and
in doing so the red wire that goes from the battery terminal to the
small pcboard inside the winder disconnected itself from the pcboard
before I could notice
That would have to be a trauma of seismic proportions. Shutter speed
was 1/4000 at f/2.8.
To tell you the truth, I cannot recall the last time I used any lens
except the FA*400/5.6 at full opening.
:-\
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
We have always characterized bats as flying rats
h. Nice pic, but I find the coloration of the
goose blends too well into the background hiding the
bird.
As for the image viewer, I use the Windows Image and
Fax vieweer that comes with XP works fine for me.
Jerry in Houston
I had asked the bird to move to a better background location, but
being Canadian, he didn't have time to fly somewhere else, he wanted
to get back home. grin.
--
Bruce
Sunday, April 3, 2005, 11:26:30 AM, you wrote:
JiH We have always characterized bats as flying rats
JiH h. Nice
Well, it IS a 300/4.5.
But where did the F* go?
Collin
*Quasi Modo
*Fri, 01 Apr 2005 05:47:19 -0800
*Yeah, but is it auto-focus? Seriously, I'd never seen his work
*before, and scanning his other items for sale he certainly deals in
*obscurity and hilarity.
*
*On Apr 1, 2005 12:49 PM, William
And don't we all know that high bidder? JCO, is that your bidding account?
Collin
*Quasi Modo
*Fri, 01 Apr 2005 05:47:19 -0800
*Yeah, but is it auto-focus? Seriously, I'd never seen his work
*before, and scanning his other items for sale he certainly deals in
*obscurity and hilarity.
*
*On Apr
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/bw3/john.html
Me(taken by Patsy with my camera)
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/bw3/johnandbruce.html
John and Bruce
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/bw3/perrier.html
Perrier
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/bw3/shel.html
Shel
John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:12:59PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Actually, I've done my hot young babe thing. About 5 years ago, I
dated a lovely lady about 17 years my junior. I gotta tell ya, it was
an ego-booster. Only lasted about 6 months, though,
We've all done that, Frank.
C'mon Bruce, what kind of lame excuse is that. Separate the goose from the
background and then add one of those Montreal at dusk pics someone posted
as the new background. That would make a great photograph and your goose
wouldn't feel as homesick as is obvious in this pic LOL
BTW, I quite like
Welcome back, Shaun. Post us some pix of the little guy.
Joe
Jostein wrote:
That would have to be a trauma of seismic proportions. Shutter speed was
1/4000 at f/2.8.
8-(((
To tell you the truth, I cannot recall the last time I used any lens
except the FA*400/5.6 at full opening.
:-\
Jostein
- Original Message - From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Sunday, April 3, 2005, 4:38:44 PM, Mark wrote:
Cotty, don't let us down!
You're in the right location to get a good camera photo.
Is the Radcliffe Camera a camera obscura, or just a big room?
We have a camera obscura here in Greenwich. Since about 1700, in fact.
It has a moving dome, so
Hi,
The phrase It ain't fun, but it usually ain't fatal might also be
applied to Bill Owens' cherry-flavored beer; Don survived that last year
at GFM. He should be able to handle chemo...
you should be in advertising - that's very good!
--
Cheers,
Bob
http://www.tekade.de/news/html/k1000-d.html
Babelfish translation:
New Pentax DSLR On the industrial show in Taipeh a model of a new Pentax DSLR
was to see (the picture originates from a video)work name K1000-d at the
edge. Admits became the following features: -8 megapixels -K-AF2-Bajonett
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, jtainter wrote:
http://www.tekade.de/news/html/k1000-d.html
Babelfish translation:
Sorry to be a pain, but can you also translate the bottom bit?
Kostas (the one that reads (c) TeKaDe 01.04.2005 ;-)
On 2005-04-03, at 21:32, jtainter wrote:
http://www.tekade.de/news/html/k1000-d.html
Babelfish translation:
New Pentax DSLR On the industrial show in Taipeh a model of a new
Pentax DSLR was to see (the picture originates from a video)work
name K1000-d at the edge. Admits became the following
http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/2005/02/news-recent-top-five-camera-sales-in.html
The KM sales figures may just reflect pent-up demand, and will likely drop.
Joe
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
