Fascinating -- and great work as usual.
Paul
On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:32 PM, Mark C wrote:
I usually try to post only new stuff, which means I may not post much at
times, but my blog's lead post was an announcement for a gallery opening and
book signing that have both passed so I had to put
Pentax made a Leica-mount version of the 43/1.9 limited.
On Dec 15, 2011, at 2:08 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Yeah, I saw that and thought it was pretty silly.
I hunted and found two Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limiteds available on Ebay.
One in the
Thanks, Ann - it's an amazing 56F this morning, but hopefully I can get
some new shots in the next few weeks!
On 12/14/2011 11:41 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
That's just amazing stuff, Mark
Thanks for showing it - the differences are fascinating -
science is beautiful :-)
ann
On 12/14/2011
Thanks, Bob - I'm going to pull another print of that Chicago AM photo
tonight, as the one in the gallery sold pretty fast. I took with a
little Nikon P6000 PS and actually prints well up to 15 x 21 inches.
Mark C.
On 12/14/2011 11:42 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Mark,
That Chicago AM picture,
Thanks, Paul!
On 12/15/2011 7:24 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Fascinating -- and great work as usual.
Paul
On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:32 PM, Mark C wrote:
I usually try to post only new stuff, which means I may not post much at times,
but my blog's lead post was an announcement for a gallery
Hi David -
There is a photo of the basic setup in this blog post from 2007 - it has
not changed much:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/first_snow_crystals_winter_2007_08
I've changed the color filters inside the can a little to improve the
lighting - the shots I took last
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I'm lost here. It sounds like there is some interesting lens mount
compatibility issues going on here. Could someone please give me a brief
explanation?
Rokkor is Minolta, did they make lenses for Leica?
Minolta made a
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
... went for an M-Rokkor
40mm f/2 instead (identical to the Summicron-C 40mm f/2 I had with my
CL once upon a time).
I'm lost here. It sounds like there is some
This (these) shots are wonders to me, Mark. Considering their short fragile
lives, I'm very
impressed by your ability to overcome what must present numerous problems
You needn't provide your method in detail, but I do have one persistent
question please: Are the flakes caught on a freezing
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:08 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: OT: How far do you think ... ?
They just want you to ~think~ he was on Marine One. It was a
http://photo.net/equipment/pentax/q/review/
Nothing old, nothing new, but he does relate the camera to a smart car
in his conclusions, so that's something, right???
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario,
Lovely as always. I like the gradient effects in the back grounds.
Dave
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I usually try to post only new stuff, which means I may not post much at
times, but my blog's lead post was an announcement for a gallery opening and
Never mind, Mark. I stumbled upon your setup provided to David.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: GESO - Classified Snow Crystals
Hi David -
There is a photo
Nice gallery.
Cormorants and Roberts, we can;t ask for anything more.:-0
Dave
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/boston-december-2011/20573460_3tSjPG
Didn't get a good shot of my PDML compadres, so I got
Camera camera on ther wall
Dave
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:00 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Just fooling around the other night:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/12/phone-cam-cat.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments always wecome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On 12/15/2011 02:21, Bob W wrote:
On 12/14/2011 23:08, Jack Davis wrote:
Thoroughly enjoyed joining you and comrades in the Boston area. Is
that the same cormorant Mark recently showed?
Jack ;-)
Thanks, Jack
Yes, same cormy... there was only one.
Well, that's a clear breach of PDML
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14803172size=lg
I like the first one better, the second one loses too much sharpness.
Rather than taking out the noise with noise reduction, maybe you could
do it, at least in the sky by doing something with the colors. If you're
working in lightroom,
I usually try to post only new stuff, which means I may not post much at
times, but my blog's lead post was an announcement for a gallery opening
and book signing that have both passed so I had to put something new up
there. So - I reposted an article that appeared on my book's blog in
On 15/12/2011 08:28, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
Here's the gear you need:
http://udreplicas.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=61
needs a bigger codpiece
That seems to have stunned the list into a four hour
On 15/12/2011 10:03 AM, Tom C wrote:
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions John and Larry. I've tried to
avoid selective noise reduction, etc., but that may be the only answer
in this case. I've spent more time working on this one image than any
other image ever... part of it is a learning
After eight months of failed attempts, we finally got one of my
daughter's fellow Peace Corps volunteers to bring home the little
African dog she had adopted. The second picture is better, but the
first will resonate with all photographers.
Taken on it's own merits, most of the reasonable reviewers find it a
well engineered little camera that takes good pictures. I simply hate
those who compare it blindly to DSLRs. The price may be the same, but
you're paying for the small size.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, David J Brooks
Nice. The cat in the yard is my favorite.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 12/15/2011 02:21, Bob W wrote:
On 12/14/2011 23:08, Jack Davis wrote:
Thoroughly enjoyed joining you and comrades in the Boston area. Is
that the same cormorant Mark
I read that in Wikipedia too.
I've been in DC several times in the last 5 years. A couple of times
I've seen the helicopters land at the White House learned later that
they were indeed there to pick up or deliver the President. In both
cases I saw only one helicopter being used.
On another
From: frank theriault
Just fooling around the other night:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/12/phone-cam-cat.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments always wecome.
cheers,
frank
Insufficient regression.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Jeffery Johnson
This should cover it all this Holiday
http://youtu.be/DSZNpC1ANUM
Bah Hum-um-um-um-bug! 8-D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
From: Adam Montoya
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Jeffery Johnson
jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net wrote:
This should cover it all this Holiday
http://youtu.be/DSZNpC1ANUM
I'm on a limited 3g connection. Did he get the Winter Solstice in it?
Yeah. But he overlooked the fact that it's only
That's what I was going for. Sufficient regression is s overdone.
;-)
Thanks for the comment, and thanks to Ann and Dave for commenting.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Sent: December 15, 2011 12/15/11
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO -
Nice capture of a good looking animal.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Peso: Lukas learns about cameras
After eight months of failed attempts, we finally got one of my
daughter's
Cute pooch! Both are terrific shots.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Sent: December 15, 2011 12/15/11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Peso: Lukas learns about cameras
After eight months of failed attempts, we finally got one
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:45:56PM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Evan Hanson
I've recently been going through some negatives from the early 80s and
I'm shocked by hold well some of them held up and how poorly others
did not. I was a kid so most of the times I'm sure I was buying the
From: kwal...@peoplepc.com
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PPG Lens issue
Every single picture I've uploaded I had to select the lens, even
though it caught all the other data. The submitters may not be
selecting the lens when they upload.
I just voted on a bunch
PPG responded to my Help! Nobody can see my photo, including me
message and it was fixed in a few days.
The one image on my Artist page looked pretty lonely. But today, I
checked and the other two I submitted were also approved.
The gust front photo (first one approved) must have been submitted
I dunno why, but I kept trying to read it as the Magoo-Lee
classification system.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From: Tom C
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14803172size=lg
I like the first one better, the second one loses too much sharpness.
Rather than taking out the noise with noise reduction, maybe you could
do it, at least in the sky by doing something with the colors. If you're
working in
From: William Robb
On 15/12/2011 10:03 AM, Tom C wrote:
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions John and Larry. I've tried to
avoid selective noise reduction, etc., but that may be the only answer
in this case. I've spent more time working on this one image than any
other image ever... part of
I made sure the smallest dimension is 900 px. , as PPG requests.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Subject: PPG: 3 for 3
PPG responded to my Help! Nobody can see my photo, including me
message
From: Steven Desjardins
Nice. The cat in the yard is my favorite.
If my yard looked like that, my neighbors would be complaining all the
time.
Come to think of it, my back yard does look like that and the neighbors
do complain all the time.
Never mind.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The dimensions requirement is screwy. I had to resize some landscape
orientation pictures to be 900 pixels tall. Who codes a viewer
exclusively by how tall a picture is?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
I made sure the smallest dimension is 900 px. , as PPG
David Parsons wrote:
The dimensions requirement is screwy. I had to resize some landscape
orientation pictures to be 900 pixels tall. Who codes a viewer
exclusively by how tall a picture is?
Anyone who expects viewers to be using a horizontally-oriented monitor
- where height is the limiting
Hopefully a wonderfully, foggy, slimy lens resulted.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:54 AM
Subject: Peso: Lukas learns about cameras
After eight months of failed
I'd do it in layers. The sky is the problem. Do a layer, work the noise
reduction in it to make the sky look good and then erase it where you
don't want noise reduction.
Conversely, you could probably use the magic wand to select the sky, and
work it separately, either as a new layer or just
For some reason, PPG doesn't list the Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 as one of
the choices.
:)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:27:04PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
David Parsons wrote:
The dimensions requirement is screwy. I had to resize some landscape
orientation pictures to be 900 pixels tall. Who codes a viewer
exclusively by how tall a picture is?
Anyone who expects viewers to be
har!
adorable pup. wish the edge of whatever the white thing is wasnt
there... yet you want his paws in I guess...
what would a tight headshot crop do?
ann
On 12/15/2011 12:54, Steven Desjardins wrote:
After eight months of failed attempts, we finally got one of my
daughter's fellow Peace
On 12/15/2011 13:00, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Nice. The cat in the yard is my favorite.
tanks..
As objective as I can be, I think it is the best shot of the group.
All the others suffer from my inability to hold a camera steady or are
just informative.
ann
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at
On 12/15/2011 13:52, Darren Addy wrote:
PPG responded to my Help! Nobody can see my photo, including me
message and it was fixed in a few days.
The one image on my Artist page looked pretty lonely. But today, I
checked and the other two I submitted were also approved.
The gust front photo
I have to add I'm, also, down for the cat shot.
Suits the scene.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Geso: (small) A few shots from the Boston trip
On
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16192563
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I have submitted 5 altogether and have had 3 accepted.
The winter shot last year and the two stills were shot several years ago.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/collinbrendemuehl
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it should
be here early next week.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it
should be here early next week.
So, what they are saying is, its in the
Those are three strong images, Collin. I remember casting a thumbs
up for the violin still life, and it is my favorite of the three. I
don't recall seeing the other two in the voting process.
Your portrait leaves something to be desired, however. G
Dan Matyola
Congratulations; the images all look fine to me.
I definitely remember the Colorado Front Range photo from the voting
process; I liked it then, and I still like it.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Darren Addy
iPads should not be a problem. If the iPad is in portrait
orientation, physically turning the unit 90 degrees will reorient it
to landscape.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:44 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
Now that iPads and
On 12/15/2011 2:40 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
My camera has been repaired, it's in QA. They could ship it overnight, but
that would be $65, so I won't have it for the event on Saturday, but it should
be here early next
On 12/15/2011 10:12 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: frank theriault
Just fooling around the other night:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/12/phone-cam-cat.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments always wecome.
cheers,
frank
Insufficient regression.
You can say that again.
--
Larry Colen
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU. WISH I WAS THERE
JIM
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
John Francis wrote:
Now that iPads and the like are becoming more common, assuming landscape
orientation for the display is becoming a riskier proposition, but it is
still probably good enough for 99% of the users (Occupy Screenspace!)
I have a Toshiba Thrive (Android tablet) and one of the nice
A phone pic. On bad days I take my exercise by walking a few miles at the mall.
On Saturday, Santa led a sing along. I felt compelled to capture a pic of a
spectator who was capturing a pic.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14777272size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Jack -
I just catch the crystals on a cold piece of glass. I do it all outside
in my unheated / detached garage. As long as the glass is a few degrees
below freezing it works fine. I've lost many crystals by holding the
glass too close and breathing on them - another Homer Simpson DOH!
Thanks, Dave - I've been working on the backgrounds, but it is still
more luck than anything else.
On 12/15/2011 9:49 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Lovely as always. I like the gradient effects in the back grounds.
Dave
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Mark Cpdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I
On 12/15/2011 12:08 PM, Tom C wrote:
I usually try to post only new stuff, which means I may not post much at times,
but my blog's lead post was an announcement for a gallery opening and book
signing that have both passed so I had to put something new up there. So - I
reposted an article that
On 12/15/2011 21:31, Mark C wrote:
Hi Jack -
I just catch the crystals on a cold piece of glass. I do it all outside
in my unheated / detached garage. As long as the glass is a few degrees
below freezing it works fine. I've lost many crystals by holding the
glass too close and breathing on
On 12/14/2011 10:00 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Just fooling around the other night:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/12/phone-cam-cat.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments always wecome.
cheers,
frank
Fun shot but shouldn't there be a cartoon bubble over the cat's head
with Fer cryin' out
That's very appealing - you must have a good cell phone :-)
ann
On 12/15/2011 20:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A phone pic. On bad days I take my exercise by walking a few miles at the mall.
On Saturday, Santa led a sing along. I felt compelled to capture a pic of a
spectator who was capturing a
LOL there is always one in the crowd.
Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John
Sessoms
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:20 PM
To:
Thanks Ann. I do have a good cell phone -- as long as the light is flat. Even a
bit of back light sends it into a tizzy. (It's a Motorola Droid 2.) Notice how
long a lens that point and shoot camera has. Santa looms large!
Paul
On Dec 15, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
That's very
Your usual very high standard of work here, Mark. I don't get that
classification system, despite you attempts to explain it.
Exquisite photos!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Sent: December 15, 2011 12/15/11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Yep, its the black professional model !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Shooting Santa
That's very appealing - you must have a good cell phone :-)
ann
On 12/15/2011 20:23,
Hi Jim
Nice to hear from you. I hope things have improved for you health-wise.
A happy Christmas to you and yours.
Cheers
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011, at
I was there last month and took some pix:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/11/18/Antwerp
It's not famous for much except diamonds and Rubens. But the women
tend to be tall and skinny, not Rubensesque at all, near as I could
tell in their November woollies, which isn't very near. -T
All very nice
I was there last month and took some pix:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/11/18/Antwerp
It's not famous for much except diamonds and Rubens. But the women
tend to be tall and skinny, not Rubensesque at all, near as I could
tell in their November woollies, which
I liked most the tree shadow!
Something wrong with me?
Spotting the differences in the quality of your equipment by just
looking at web sized images is very difficult, if not impossible.
I should have known this earlier, before becoming too gadgety ;)
Bulent
74 matches
Mail list logo
