To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Any Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA in Melbourne?
Just had a thought - from exactly where are you going to hang the bells Tan?
(Ducks)
John in Brisbane
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New
On 8 May 2010 13:01, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
I've registered for the exhibition part. I'm planning to be there on
Friday afternoon. And (I've requested a ticket for) the shark
photography talk on Saturday
On Sat, 08 May 2010 13:01 +1000, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
wrote:
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
Melbourne in June! And you being from Brissie - better bring your
winter woolies.
I went to PMA in Sydney last year
Walters
Sent: Saturday, 8 May 2010 4:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Any Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA in Melbourne?
On Sat, 08 May 2010 13:01 +1000, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
wrote:
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 8 May 2010 13:01, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
I may be in Melbourne that weekend, but I'll be house-hunting if I am
(unfortunately).
Ciao,
Pete in western Sydney
--
PDML
: Any Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA in Melbourne?
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA in Melbourne?
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Of
Tanya Love
Sent: Saturday, 8 May 2010 1:01 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: Any Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA in Melbourne?
It's the 4-6th June, and I'll be there with bells on and sans kids!
Woohoo!
Tan. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
HI Tan,
I had completely forgotten about PMA. I'll certainly be in Melbourne
and happy to catch up and show off equipment and so on (with my wife
Audrey in tow - that's OK, she understands photography).
When you have the list of those who will be around and when you plan
on catching up with us
Siiigh, you lot never miss an opportunity do you?!?
;-P
t.x.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John
Coyle
Sent: Saturday, 8 May 2010 1:52 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Any Aussie PDML'ers going to PMA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUGzV6Qc8m8NR=1
The first of 5 parts and interesting stuff I missed. (April 2009?)
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
G'day all
A friend and I spent a couple of hours this morning at the PMA Sydney
(Photo Marketing Association) biennial imaging technology show at
Darling Harbour. The exhibition comes to Sydney every two years
(although we missed out in 2007 due to APEC).
All of the big and not so big players
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/PMA_Pentax_revives_medium_format_digital_camera_plan_news_278069.html
^^^ Amazing, maybe 645D isnt dead as yet...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
I'd go for the implants now.
Then you'll have something to tear out over future announcements. :-)
Jostein
2009/3/2 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:21 PM, .timbercode tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Cheers list,
Two announcements from Pentax:
The already known bridge:
For those interested,
---
Micro-FourThirds product news from Panasonic... the expected HD
addition to the G1, two new lenses.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 with HD video recording
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030315panasoniclumixdmcgh1.asp
Panasonic Lumix G 7-14mm f/4 ASPH lens:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
For those interested,
---
Micro-FourThirds product news from Panasonic... the expected HD addition to
the G1, two new lenses.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 with HD video recording
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
Now all I need is a business reason to do HD video clips. And some money.
I'd be happy to have a business that made me money.:-)
Dave
];-)
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mar 3, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
One interesting thing, the new sensor in the GH1 is similar to the
LX3's, it's only 4/3rds format when in 4:3 mode, the sensor is larger
and maintains AoV and MP count when switching between aspect ratios,
unlike the G1's sensor which is 10MP in
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
One interesting thing, the new sensor in the GH1 is similar to the
LX3's, it's only 4/3rds format when in 4:3 mode, the sensor is larger
and maintains AoV and MP count when
There're speculation about Pentax next DSLR's K(whatever)D's. But what
if Pentax executive gave Leica kudos with a reason and next Pentax shall
be hybrid with K-mount in-body SR and features of Leica VLUX 1,
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091409leicavlux1.asp
However, there's just one
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Roman Melihhov ro...@blakout.net wrote:
There're speculation about Pentax next DSLR's K(whatever)D's. But what if
Pentax executive gave Leica kudos with a reason and next Pentax shall be
hybrid with K-mount in-body SR and features of Leica VLUX 1,
I was in my local Leica pusher's today, dropping the M8 off to have the
shutter release / on-off switch fixed, and putting the M4-2 up for sale. I
was very tempted by a beautiful 1929 Leica 1 at a surprisingly reasonable
price. I chatted to the evil person who tempts innocent photographers with
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I was in my local Leica pusher's today, dropping the M8 off to have the
shutter release / on-off switch fixed, and putting the M4-2 up for sale. I
was very tempted by a beautiful 1929 Leica 1 at a surprisingly reasonable
I was in my local Leica pusher's today, dropping the M8 off
to have the
shutter release / on-off switch fixed, and putting the M4-2
up for sale. I
was very tempted by a beautiful 1929 Leica 1 at a
surprisingly reasonable
price. I chatted to the evil person who tempts innocent
Hi Roman (and others),
Actually, there have been some signs of Pentax bridge camera for quite
some time now. So, at least I wouldn't be surprised at all to see one
very soon. Besides, all those advanced compacts and bridge cameras do
make a profit. Without a profit we'll never see high-end
Cheers list,
Two announcements from Pentax:
The already known bridge:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030204pentax70superzoom.asp
And the 15mm/f4
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030203pentaxx15mm.asp
Regards,
t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +0100, .timbercode wrote:
# Cheers list,
#
# Two announcements from Pentax:
# The already known bridge:
# http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030204pentax70superzoom.asp
#
# And the 15mm/f4
# http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030203pentaxx15mm.asp
I've been
I've been holding off on a new body until I found out what the next
generation [...] would be like.
when you're a balding middle-aged straight guy you don't care what your
body's like, cause all the youngsters look damned good.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +0100, .timbercode wrote:
#
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:21 PM, .timbercode tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Cheers list,
Two announcements from Pentax:
The already known bridge:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030204pentax70superzoom.asp
And the 15mm/f4
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030203pentaxx15mm.asp
Regards,
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/28 Mon PM 05:46:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
David J Brooks wrote:
My personal stuff that I really like, is printed, eventually. I just
wish BW was a bit more readily
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
people do it.
In fact, if you think about it for a moment, it's the old way of doing
things back in the film era that was absurd: You had to get prints made
before you could decide which of your
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/29 Tue PM 02:15:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
people do it.
In fact
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/29 Tue PM 02:15:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
people do it.
In fact
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David J Brooks wrote:
My personal stuff that I really like, is printed, eventually. I just
wish BW was a bit more readily available for prints, as a few years
ago.
That's a pretty sensible way of doing things and it's probably how most
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
Agreed. It was a good alternative (well, E6 was) and it was, in fact,
how I worked. But it was never more than a tiny minority of mainstream
film users (even if you include E6 as well
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/27 Sun PM 10:00:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:51 PM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/26 Sat
I think Facebook, Livejournal and MySpace have put a nail in the
general printing market and it's going to tail off to much smaller
numbers. Why print your crappy vacation photos when you can
share them
will all your friends, properly annotated, on Facebook? It's
pretty
much what every
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
So instead of having an intrinsically renewable part of the process (film and
processing/printing) photography now relies on selling the customer new
equipment to maintain
its income stream
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Prints are for grandmas and serious shooters.
Well, I know i'm NOT a Grandma.:-)
Dave
-Adam
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas
I think Facebook, Livejournal and MySpace have put a nail in the
general printing market and it's going to tail off to much smaller
numbers. Why print your crappy vacation photos when you can share them
will all your friends, properly annotated, on
But I don't think we've ever taken you particularly seriously either...
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Prints are for grandmas and serious shooters.
Well, I know i'm NOT a Grandma.:-)
Dave
-Adam
--
M. Adam Maas
David J Brooks wrote:
My personal stuff that I really like, is printed, eventually. I just
wish BW was a bit more readily available for prints, as a few years
ago.
That's a pretty sensible way of doing things and it's probably how most
people do it.
In fact, if you think about it for a
On 7/28/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Prints are for grandmas and serious shooters.
Well, I know i'm NOT a Grandma.:-)
Mark
Dave
-Adam
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Prints are for grandmas and serious shooters.
Well, I know i'm NOT a Grandma.:-)
Oh thank God you know. We'd been meaning to tell you for some time now
but just couldn't decide who was going to be
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
In fact, if you think about it for a moment, it's the old way of doing
things back in the film era that was absurd: You had to get prints made
before you could decide which of your shots were worth
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Prints are for grandmas and serious shooters.
Well, I know i'm NOT a Grandma.:-)
Oh thank God you know. We'd been meaning to
William Robb wrote:
The average North American picture consumer has the photographic
education of a gnat, and usually was standing at the counter with
a diaper bag in one hand and a diaper filler in the other.
Priceless. (Not that I'm disagreeing...)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/26 Sat PM 04:14:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000
prints from digital
sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:51 PM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/26 Sat PM 04:14:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000 prints
from digital
sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9 billion prints from film, and 16.3 prints
from digital.
2008 projects to be 5.8 billion film prints, 16.3 digital prints.
In 2007, 35% of digital prints were made at
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000
prints from digital
sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9 billion prints from film, and 16.3
prints from digital.
2008 projects to be 5.8 billion film prints, 16.3 digital prints.
In 2007, 35% of digital prints were made
The reduction of total volume is surprisingly small considering
digital users can glean the best shots unlike film users who tend to
get whole rolls printed. A possibility is that while prints per
camera is lower, the total number of cameras in use is greater now
than during the golden age of
William Robb wrote:
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000 prints
from digital sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9 billion prints from film,
and 16.3 prints from digital. 2008 projects to be 5.8 billion film prints,
16.3 digital prints.
You dropped the units
2008/7/27 keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
William Robb wrote:
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000 prints
from digital sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9 billion prints from film,
and 16.3 prints from digital. 2008 projects to be 5.8 billion film prints,
16.3
John Celio wrote:
In other news, it looks like the trend in photolabs is away from wet
prints. Fuji's new line of
Frontier machines is using inkjet technology.
I wonder if that's because they could make more money selling ink rather
than chemicals. Personally, I hope labs stay with
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: OT: Interesting PMA numbers
William Robb wrote:
In 2000, US consumers made 29.9 billion prints from film, and 500,000 prints
from digital sources. In 2007, consumers made 8.9 billion prints from film,
and 16.3 prints from digital
Crkennedy stand had pentax camera's in one desk and had to ask to look and
play. A DA*300 was in a cabinet along with other showy bits and couldn't be
touched. A second cabinet with sigma lenses was right next to it, none of
which were PK mount. Samsung had cameras out and could be played with. I
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:15:57 +1000, james Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Crkennedy stand had pentax camera's in one desk and had to ask to look
and play. AT least Samsung made a good effort. Cr didn't do a
very good job.
Seems like nothing's changed, then.
Cheers
Brian
Including John Carlson talking about the K20D/K200D and the new Limited.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS08/PMAS08VIDEO.HTML#
But for me, I like the custom bobbleheads. I'd love to get a few of those.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML
The Sony Full Frame SLR with Image stabilization is interesting. I
guess all those who said you couldn't have in body stabilization with
26x36mm sensors were just wrong. It is an ugly camera though. (I guess
Sony fired all the Minolta styling people that Konica hadn't).
Derby Chang wrote:
Me to.:-0
I had a look at the Tamron video. That VC seems to work well.
Dave
On Feb 4, 2008 3:54 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Including John Carlson talking about the K20D/K200D and the new Limited.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS08/PMAS08VIDEO.HTML#
But for me, I
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23119249
Note the last pic, CR Kennedy's had the diminutive DA300/4 in the
cabinet with an f2.8 label, professionally remedied I must say ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
On 5/6/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23119249
Note the last pic, CR Kennedy's had the diminutive DA300/4 in the
cabinet with an f2.8 label, professionally remedied I must say ;-)
That's very professional indeed.
I was there when the rep corrected it about 30 minutes after the show
was opened to the public (it was trade only until 2 pm Saturday) and
this one rep had already been told 4 times that the label was wrong (as
had the others). He finished talking to me and headed for the cabinet
to change
Are any of the Victorian or even Australian list members going to the
Photo Marketing Association show in Melbourne this weekend?
C.R. Kennedy has a stall so hopefully there will be the chance to talk
Pentax with people.
Their website is http://www.photoimagingworld.com.au/
Free Registration
On 12/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Great house, Cotty. But the camera sucks:-)
Thanks Paul. I know I'll be labelled as a heretic, but I have to say
that the 1D is the best photographic device I've ever used - certainly
on a par with the LX in terms of build quality and sheer
Well I think 1D and K10D are not exactly in the same league.
But letting both of them where the should be, I still think the K10D
should wow you, for what it is I mean.
IMO There's simply no competition. It doesn't mean it is ideal or
perfect. But for now, it is the best deal by far.
2007/3/13,
On 13/3/07, Thibouille, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well I think 1D and K10D are not exactly in the same league.
But letting both of them where the should be, I still think the K10D
should wow you, for what it is I mean.
IMO There's simply no competition. It doesn't mean it is ideal or
perfect.
On Mar 13, 2007, at 2:47 AM, Cotty wrote:
Thanks Paul. I know I'll be labelled as a heretic, but I have to say
that the 1D is the best photographic device I've ever used - certainly
on a par with the LX in terms of build quality and sheer respect.
Reliability-wise, no contest. I loved the LX
Cotty wrote:
I think you've got to take into account the three distinct levels of
permutations (entry/prosumer/professional) within those releases, and
even then there are two sub-levels within the professional range (1.3
and full frame). In the 1.3 crop range (that I went for) there have
On 13/3/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
You forgot the 1DIIn in 2005 I think. Minor upgrade but, according to
the nuts on naturescapes.net, image quality was improved enough to make
a difference.
Oh fartballs. You're completely right.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 13/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hmm. Which bug-bear was that?
What the camera looks like ;-))
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hmm. Which bug-bear was that?
What the camera looks like ;-))
LOL!!! Looks like a camera, 'tis all right with me. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Here's an interview with Mr. Torigoe and Mr. Tatamika at PMA:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2007/03/12/5799.html
A translation was done by Katsura at Pentaxforums:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/35557-post1.html
Basically, there will be replacement models for K100D and K10D
Here's an interview with Mr. Torigoe and Mr. Tatamika at PMA:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2007/03/12/5799.html
A translation was done by Katsura at Pentaxforums:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/35557-post1.html
Basically, there will be replacement models for K100D and K10D
Thanks or posting this Lawrence. It was very usefull.
Regards,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Lawrence
Kwan
Enviada: segunda-feira, 12 de Março de 2007 17:48
Para: pdml@pdml.net
Assunto: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Here's
On 12/3/07, Lawrence Kwan, discombobulated, unleashed:
A translation was done by Katsura at Pentaxforums:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/35557-post1.html
- K1D is still in planning stage, and nothing solid at all yet, not a
problem.
Not a problem for my hat either :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
My wallet is not happy with this announcement of non-trivial, yearly
updates.
Now you know how it feels to have bought into Canon.
Of course, you don't have to buy a new camera every year, just
Pentax's RD staff are depressed.
Wait. Hold everything. Let me go get my fiddle.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks as well to Lawrence and Katsura.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Manuel Magalhães
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 7:17 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Thanks or posting
I was tempted to get a K100D when it came out. Now, I've decided to use
my *ist D. Why get sucked into wanting to keep up with everyone else
whenever a new model comes out..
Jim A.
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
My
I was tempted to get a K100D when it came out. Now, I've decided to
use my *ist D. Why get sucked into wanting to keep up with everyone
else whenever a new model comes out..
Jim A.
-
That's a reasonable reaction, Jim. It's bad enough that computer
technology is changed so often. I'm
In a message dated 3/12/2007 11:14:44 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an interview with Mr. Torigoe and Mr. Tatamika at PMA:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2007/03/12/5799.html
A translation was done by Katsura at Pentaxforums:
http
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
That's a reasonable reaction, Jim. It's bad enough that computer
technology is changed so often. I'm not happy about cameras going that
way too.
I just went over to the Canon museum and had a poke
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Does this mean there will be a K10D next generation BEFORE next holiday
season (read as Xmas)?
Sure sounds like they mean to that. Course there is a big difference
between
plans
In a message dated 3/12/2007 2:18:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The K10 was about 6 months late, IIRC. It is possible that a fall release
doesn't mean fall in the northern hemisphere.
William Robb
===
Oh, good pt.
Marnie aka Doe
Right before Lawrence made his post, Ken contacted me off list with a
different translation. I wasn't going to post it now this thread is started,
but
since both are translations maybe one is slightly clearer on some point than
the other.
So here is another translation,
Considerate of you to post this Ken, Thanks!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right before Lawrence made his post, Ken contacted me off list with
a
different translation. I wasn't going to post it now this thread is
started, but
since both are translations maybe one is slightly
Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
That's a reasonable reaction, Jim. It's bad enough that computer
technology is changed so often. I'm not happy about cameras going that
way too.
I just went over
:
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
That's a reasonable reaction, Jim. It's bad enough that computer
technology is changed so often. I'm not happy about cameras going that
way too.
I just went over to the Canon museum and had
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
I count 5 Pentax DSLR models. based on major differences. The D,
DS/DS2, DL/DL2, K100, K110, K10. I'm not sure if the K100 and K110 are
enough different to warrant being considered separate models
Frankly, Canon was that way with film cameras, too. They have been on
a fairly aggressive release schedule for a long time. If you are
looking forward to the next great thing, or looking at how progressive
a company is, this is a good thing. If you are worried about your
pocket book and current
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Frankly, Canon was that way with film cameras, too. They have been on
a fairly aggressive release schedule for a long time. If you are
looking forward to the next great thing, or looking at how
On 12/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I was tempted to get a K100D when it came out. Now, I've decided to use
my *ist D. Why get sucked into wanting to keep up with everyone else
whenever a new model comes out..
Agreed. I shall suffer in silence and be lumbered with
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
http://www.cottysnaps.com/Greystones/march07.html
I might as well give up and go back to crayons.
I can't believe people still have to live in hovels.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Frankly, Canon was that way with film cameras, too. They have been on
a fairly aggressive release schedule for a long time. If you are
looking forward to the next great thing, or looking at how progressive
a company is, this is a good thing. If you
On 12/3/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even so, Canon has amost a dozen more DSLR models on the ground than Pentax
for more or less the same time frame.
My Canon buddy well remembers the bitchin over on the Canon forums from the
people who were going broke buying the latest and
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Interview at PMA 2007
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:06:27 -0700
One thing to remember is that every time there is a new release, you
get coverage
Great house, Cotty. But the camera sucks:-).
Paul
On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I was tempted to get a K100D when it came out. Now, I've decided to
use
my *ist D. Why get sucked into wanting to keep up with everyone
1 - 100 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
