Damn, forgot the link.
Thomas Wittek schrieb:
> That's mainly what I did as stated in my first post[1]. [...]
[1]:
news://nntp.perl.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juerd schrieb:
> * Markdown does not have tables.
> * Textile does not have paragraphs in table cells.
> * Kwiki does not have paragraphs in table cells.
>
> Unless someone comes up with another way to do side-by-side layouts
> (extremely useful for showcasing differences between Perl 5 and Perl 6
Udo Güngerich schrieb:
> Thomas Wittek wrote:
>> Unfortunately you probably have to throw away/heavily modify earlier
>> increments, if you add features like a flexible syntax, which will need
>> a different internal infrastructure.
>
> Well, if object-oriented design has any advantage at all, her
I also agree that Object Oriented Design would work wonderfully well
here. The key here is prototyping its shape and then filling in the
details once it has taken this shape.
I like the term 'messages' for methods because it reminds me that the
objects must send requests, forms of communication,
Thomas Wittek wrote:
>
> Good ideas. But maybe we should start a bit smaller ;)
> It might be a good idea to create a list of features separated in
> several increments (releases) to get a running system early.
Absolutely.
> I could imagine increments like "Parsing/Converting", "Storage
> backe
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juerd):
>
> * Markdown does not have tables.
> * Textile does not have paragraphs in table cells.
> * Kwiki does not have paragraphs in table cells.
>
> Unless someone comes up with another way to do side-by-side layouts
> (extremely useful for showcasing differences bet
* Markdown does not have tables.
* Textile does not have paragraphs in table cells.
* Kwiki does not have paragraphs in table cells.
Unless someone comes up with another way to do side-by-side layouts
(extremely useful for showcasing differences between Perl 5 and Perl 6),
all of these formats ar
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:59 -0400, Matt Todd wrote:
> I particularly like the syntax of Textile or even Markdown (preferring
> the former). In Ruby-land, these exist as RedCloth and BlueCloth. I
> understand porting isn't fun, but I think that this is a viable
> option, if not a great choice.
Fo
Iraq invasion indeed wait, shouldn't go there.
I particularly like the syntax of Textile or even Markdown (preferring
the former). In Ruby-land, these exist as RedCloth and BlueCloth. I
understand porting isn't fun, but I think that this is a viable
option, if not a great choice.
Not that th
> Ask Bj�rn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Woah, we are getting really far away from talking about perl6
> > here...
>
> Kind of a usenet law or corollary? "Every discussion about wikis ends
You're being a bit optimistic there, aren't you? The only way you'd end
a my-wiki-is-better-than-y
Udo Güngerich schrieb:
> Why not doing a wiki system that does NOT have a fix syntax but rather
> allows defining its syntax rules in e.g. YAML and thus being entirely
> flexible?
> [..]
> It should have a proper user/groups system as well...
> [..]
> Why not give the wiki a web service API [..]
G
Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Woah, we are getting really far away from talking about perl6
> here...
Kind of a usenet law or corollary? "Every discussion about wikis ends
in a discussion about the best wiki syntax."
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dresden Perl M
Thomas Wittek wrote:
>> Noone other than Mediawiki uses the Mediawiki syntax. I posit
>> that the reason is that that syntax blows chunks.
>
> I have to agree. 'bold and italic' is definitely not what I
> understand as an intuitive syntax.
Hi everyone,
I'd like to mention that the med
Woah, we are getting really far away from talking about perl6 here...
- ask
A. Pagaltzis schrieb:
> * Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-03 22:30]:
>> Interestingly it is very similar to Markdown although I never
>> heard about it before :)
>
> Hmm, it doesn’t look similar at all to me?
Headers (Markdown):
# This is an H1
## This is an H2
## This is an H6
He
* Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-03 22:30]:
> Interestingly it is very similar to Markdown although I never
> heard about it before :)
Hmm, it doesn’t look similar at all to me? Not even superficially
similar, but most importantly, it looks line-based. Markdown is
block-based. If you w
A. Pagaltzis schrieb:
> * Amir E. Aharoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 23:00]:
>> The popularity of Wikipedia made Media-Wiki syntax the de-facto
>> standard. It's not perfect, but please don't reinvent the wheel
>> (even though it's a PHP wheel).
> [..]
> Noone other than Mediawiki uses the Med
How about something a little less mercenary - a 1000$ donation to the
Perl Foundation/Perl 6 development in the winner's name from Athena Labs?
Might take out some of the difficulty and, who knows, get you a better
wiki (you know, the less immediately reward driven programmer or something
Hi,
Hi Conrad,
I run the grant committee for the Perl Foundation and I sit on the steering
committee, so I suppose I can discuss your proposal (there are some other TPF
folk here, too, so that's why this is a public email). Also, the following
stuff is just off the top of my head and is in
On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:45, Ovid wrote:
In any event, if you can come up with a solid set of contest rules,
TPF can consider whether or not we can officially run the contest.
It sounds like a nice idea, I just don't know what's involved.
I wouldn't claim to entirely comprehend the rules, but
ions to the list.
Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
- Original Message
From: Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: perl6-users@perl.org
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2006 12:00:51 AM
Subject: RE: $1,000 prize for Perl 6 Wiki written in Perl 6
Doe
Does anyone out there have any phone numbers for key contacts at The
Perl Foundation that you could send to me off-list? So far, I've not
heard back from anyone there. TIA.
Best regards,
Conrad Schneiker
http://perl.net.au/wiki/Perl_6_Users_FAQ (Moved from AthenaLab to Perl
6 Wiki.)
www.AthenaLa
> From: Paul Fenwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 7:28 PM
[...]
Sorry for the delay in responding. Spent much of the day fighting
windoze insanity. If not for a certain other $commitment, I probably
be shopping for a Mac about now. :-)
> Conrad Schneiker wrote:
>
> > I
Darren Duncan skribis 2006-05-28 14:37 (-0700):
> For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be
> able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' "use perl5:Foo"
> syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wiki
> solution using the NEW technology.
Amir E. Aharoni skribis 2006-05-28 22:54 (+0200):
> It's funny - i was the first one who proposed the wiki idea and i
> didn't think that it will go so far (1000$$$). If you ask me, this
> wiki should be done ASAP in Media-Wiki. Reusing current Perl wikis
> (Australian, whatever) is even better
G'day Conrad, Amir, and P6U,
Conrad Schneiker wrote:
> I certainly agree. However, someone has to take the initiative to actually
> start using (http://perl.net.au/wiki/Perl_6), and to post links back here
> for others to follow up on. Will that person be you? :-) I'm all for using
> that wiki to
> From: Darren Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:38 PM
[...]
> For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be
> able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' "use perl5:Foo"
> syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wi
> -Original Message-
> From: Amir E. Aharoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:54 PM
[...]
> It's funny - i was the first one who proposed the wiki idea and i
> didn't think that it will go so far (1000$$$). If you ask me, this
> wiki should be done ASAP in Media-
>
> Noone other than Mediawiki uses the Mediawiki syntax. I posit
> that the reason is that that syntax blows chunks.
Actually dokuwiki uses an almost the exact same syntax as mediawiki..
except they invert the headers (== foo == stuff).
as for a perl6 wiki.. I agree that there are already many
> From: Juerd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 3:55 AM
[...]
> Conrad Schneiker skribis 2006-05-27 14:34 (-0700):
> > So I'm offering to post a $1,000 prize (The AthenaLab "The 1st Extreme
> > Leverage Prize" for Perl 6), to be awarded to the person that delivers
> > the
> > f
* Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 23:40]:
> For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution
> won't be able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' "use
> perl5:Foo" syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to
> show off a Wiki solution using the NEW technol
I'm wondering about some implementation logistics.
For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be
able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' "use perl5:Foo"
syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wiki
solution using the NEW technology.
T
* Amir E. Aharoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 23:00]:
> The popularity of Wikipedia made Media-Wiki syntax the de-facto
> standard. It's not perfect, but please don't reinvent the wheel
> (even though it's a PHP wheel).
I plead not guilty.
Markdown is nothing new, and it has half a dozen impl
Beep beep. I, for example, hate the verbosity of html, but i use it
nevertheless. The popularity of Wikipedia made Media-Wiki syntax the
de-facto standard. It's not perfect, but please don't reinvent the
wheel (even though it's a PHP wheel).
It's funny - i was the first one who proposed the wiki
* Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 19:35]:
> - MediaWiki-compatible syntax
I hate the Mediawiki syntax. Can we have something that
understands blocks, like Markdown? Just add [[foo]] as intrawiki
link syntax.
> - Most \W characters can be safely used
Yeah, that is true for Markdown.
>
Conrad Schneiker skribis 2006-05-27 14:34 (-0700):
> So I'm offering to post a $1,000 prize (The AthenaLab "The 1st Extreme
> Leverage Prize" for Perl 6), to be awarded to the person that delivers the
> first (Perl 6)**2 Wiki that meets some moderate specifications.
Wow! Thanks for doing the worl
> From: Michael Mathews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:25 AM
[...]
> On 27/05/06, Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I'm offering to post a $1,000 prize (The AthenaLab "The 1st Extreme
> > Leverage Prize" for Perl 6), to be awarded to the person that deliv
On 27/05/06, Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I'm offering to post a $1,000 prize (The AthenaLab "The 1st Extreme
Leverage Prize" for Perl 6), to be awarded to the person that delivers the
first (Perl 6)**2 Wiki that meets some moderate specifications.
Now would that be New Zealan
Oops, I somehow overlooked including this intriguing item from an earlier
post:
> From: Ovid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On a related note, if anyone does want to build a P6 Wiki, you might
> consider building it on top of WWW::Kontent
> (http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Kontent/), a Perl6 CMS (C
39 matches
Mail list logo
