Ian:
How terribly interesting it this thread, for this is precisely what I have
been considering over the past couple of days. We are considering revamping
our whole library databases and as a result I have been thinking carefully
about how to better integrate Protel with our own internal parts
At 03:00 PM 5/1/2002 -0700, Mira wrote:
Does anybody know how expensive Phoenix will be?
I'm not sure that Altium even knows for sure. But they have announced that
pricing will be in line with current pricing, i.e., $7995 for 99SE full
regular price. There are often sales and specials for
I have been notified by a subscriber to this list that he received what is
probably a copy of one of the W32.Klez viruses, and that the mail appeared
to be from me.
This virus is known to spoof outgoing mail addresses, and it is quite
unlikely that I am infected -- though it is remotely
At 05:21 PM 5/1/2002 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in purchasing Protel PCB/Schematic Software with license.
Prefer Protel 98 or newer.
For the information of our readers, older Protel licenses which have not
been used for upgrade are eligible for upgrade pricing. Right now,
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed; boundary=#DM275987203#
How about turning the problem round?
What ever match, boolean or wildcard rules you add to your server, somebody
will find
somthing that is wrong with it.
As it is, it probably works for most of the people that want to use it. (I'm
going to try it
myself at some point.)
Perhaps its a better
I missed the start of this thread but surely a production/stores department
would refer to a component by an unique number - they wouldn't put a 50V
capacitor in the same bin as a 5V one. The answer then is to use the unique
number and pull the rest in from that.
Dave Hill
How many matches
Well this is wierd. Yesterday Protel worked fine. Today I start it up and
it will not open a database.
I have no Servers installed. If I add them, the next time I start Protel
they are all gone again!
Anyone ever seen this before?
Cam Andruik
Harding Instruments
780 462-7100
[EMAIL
If Delphi 6 is going to work, the personal version is sufficient.
You cannot write commercial software with it and some database
stuff is missing.
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
Linden Doyle wrote:
Greetings all,
I have read here in the past that Delphi V5
I have made a 20 pin version that I have used successfully. You can scale
it easily.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:33 AM
To: proteledaforum
Subject: [PEDA] Footprint for Hirose Connectors
I am looking for a source
Well this is wierd. Yesterday Protel worked fine. Today I start it up and
it will not open a database.
I have no Servers installed. If I add them, the next time I start Protel
they are all gone again!
Anyone ever seen this before?
Cam Andruik
Harding Instruments
780 462-7100
[EMAIL
I'm fairly certain that doing Design | Netlist Manager, then Menu | Update
free primitives from component pads will do what you want.
The synchronizer checkbox works when the relevant nets are being changed (at
the same time) through the synchronizer.
-Original Message-
From: Rene
Rene,
it is certainly possible to do using the Netlist Manager.
Design Menu, Netlist Manager, on the Menu in the bottom left, select Update
Free Primitives From Component Pads.
This will update all unassigned tracks, fills, polygons, etc. according to
the netlist names for the existing
At 05:49 PM 5/3/2002 +0200, Rene Tschaggelar wrote:
I have unassigned tracks (no net) and would like to proagate
the connected net.
In schematic there is a 'design/update pcb' that has a checkbox
for 'Assign net to connected copper'. That somewho does not appear
to work.
It should. It is
The current SDK is compatible only with Delphi D5. This is because the interface to
Protel is provided as a precompiled runtime package that is compiler specific. The
entry level Delphi 5 package should be sufficient for most
kinds of Protel server development. Check the Borland web site for
Open the file Client99SE.ini in your Windows directory with any text editor.
At the very end should be a section that is labelled: [Servers] followed by a
list of servers with the path to their associated .ins file.
For example:
...
[Servers]
ArngeCmp=C:\Program Files\Design Explorer 99
I have seen something similar... I had to re-install. - BB
-Original Message-
From: Cam Andruik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] All Servers gone
Well this is wierd. Yesterday Protel worked fine. Today I start it up
If you go to the Design Menu and select Netlist Manager there is a button
labeled Menu in the lower left corner. Click that and then select Update
Free Primitives From Component Pads and that will update all unassigned
primitives (tracks, vias, etc.).
Beware that if there are any misconnected
At 11:29 AM 5/3/2002 -0600, Cam Andruik wrote:
Well this is wierd. Yesterday Protel worked fine. Today I start it up and
it will not open a database. I have no Servers installed. If I add them,
the next time I start Protel they are all gone again!
Anyone ever seen this before?
Not this.
Rene Tschaggelar wrote:
I have unassigned tracks (no net) and would like to proagate
the connected net.
In schematic there is a 'design/update pcb' that has a checkbox
for 'Assign net to connected copper'. That somewho does not appear
to work.
Now ( in pcb editor ) I have do :
I had the same experience, for whatever reason, my computer was having
intermittent hardware problems that would give the Microsoft message box
saying that the operating system had detected some sort of problem and would
shut down in 60 seconds and I should close all open applicatiolns. Then I
On 08:13 AM 3/05/2002 +1000, Linden Doyle said:
Greetings all,
I have read here in the past that Delphi V5 is required if one wishes
to create srevers using the Protel SDK.
Is Delphi V6 also useable in this regard?
I gather not - at least this is what I was told by Protel. One of
On 10:00 AM 2/05/2002 -0700, Daniel Webster said:
Ian:
How terribly interesting it this thread, for this is precisely what I have
been considering over the past couple of days. We are considering revamping
our whole library databases and as a result I have been thinking carefully
about how to
On 01:03 PM 2/05/2002 -0400, Abd ulRahman Lomax said:
..snip..
I do understand that the Protel training, with Mr. Wilson, is quite good
Not me - I do not do any Protel training. Maybe some other Mr Wilson :-)
Ian Wilson
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post
On 08:57 AM 3/05/2002 +0100, Jason Morgan said:
How about turning the problem round?
What ever match, boolean or wildcard rules you add to your server, somebody
will find
somthing that is wrong with it.
As it is, it probably works for most of the people that want to use it. (I'm
going to try it
On 07:03 PM 2/05/2002 +0100, Dave Hill said:
I missed the start of this thread but surely a production/stores department
would refer to a component by an unique number - they wouldn't put a 50V
capacitor in the same bin as a 5V one. The answer then is to use the unique
number and pull the rest
27 matches
Mail list logo
