Re: [PEDA] Schematic hetero capabilities?

2001-10-24 Thread Douglas McDonald
I've seen a mechanism for achieving this recently on another tool. You can add run-time attributes to each gate such as GROUP=FPGA1 and then during annotation only parts with compatible attributes can/will be put together. This could also be very useful for defining components in isolated

Re: [PEDA] Schematic hetero capabilities?

2001-10-24 Thread Aalt Lokhorst
Hello all, Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:58 PM Douglas McDonald wrote: I've seen a mechanism for achieving this recently on another tool. You can add run-time attributes to each gate such as GROUP=FPGA1 and then during annotation only parts with compatible attributes can/will be put

[PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Stephen Smith
Can anybody answer this quicker than me attempting to find it in help files. I know how to adjust the rotation steps in PCB editor, but how do you adjust in in schematics from 90 degrees to 45 degrees. Steve * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Joop Reekers
Steve wrote: Can anybody answer this quicker than me attempting to find it in help files. I know how to adjust the rotation steps in PCB editor, but how do you adjust in in schematics from 90 degrees to 45 degrees. Steve Steve, As far as I can see, you can only rotate in steps of

[PEDA] macro SetTextAt

2001-10-24 Thread Richard Thompson
Hi Has anyone used the Runprocess TextEdit:SetTextAt process in a script before? i am having difficulty getting it to work. i need to paste a user inputed string from a dialogue box into a text document but nothing happens! eg. msgbox output = mystring$ resetparameters addStringParameter

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Samuel Cox \Sam\
Steve... 1.) the question should be rephrased to Symbol Rotation.. not Component Rotation.. 2.) Why would you want to rotate a symbol in Schematic capture to something other than 90 degrees.? This not standard practice. Also, keep in mind that your pins of the symbol need to end up on a

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Stephen Smith
I've already given up, and done it the standard way. I tried drawing it at 45 degrees as a library symbol, but the pins still had to be at 90 degrees. I was just designing a matrix, with about 50 odd diodes, and thought it might be easier to rotate the diodes 90 degrees. -Original

Re: [PEDA] Annotating grouped symboles (was Schematic hetero capabilities?)

2001-10-24 Thread Tony Karavidas
Protel does do this, BUT it will mess up (or actually it doesn't take into account) the order within a grouping. Use the group parts together if match by checkboxes. The default is part type but if you put some text in a part field and check the corresponding box, it will keep those parts

[PEDA] Polygon Repour in 99SE

2001-10-24 Thread websitevisitor
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=#DM2503968#

Re: [PEDA] Schematic hetero capabilities?

2001-10-24 Thread Cliff Ober
Thanks everyone for the help on this; Aalt's pointer to the info about grouping the parts is the key that should allow me to do what I want! Cliff Ober -Original Message- From: Aalt Lokhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:20 AM To: Protel EDA Forum

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Cliff Ober
There's a number of new PC motherboards coming out with the large (500 balls) Northbridge chip rotated by 45 degrees - it can ease compliance with the high speed bus constraints required for these designs. Cliff Ober -Original Message- From: Samuel Cox Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: [PEDA] Polygon Repour in 99SE

2001-10-24 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:37 AM 10/24/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how to force an update of all the polygons in a design? There may be a better way, but as I recall, moving the entire design will force an update of all polygons. So select all, pick it up at the origin and move it over an

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Tony Karavidas
That's not the issue. PCB placement can be at ANY orientation. (It's default is 90 degrees, but can be easily changed) They were talking about schematic placement. Tony -Original Message- From: Cliff Ober [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:12 AM To:

Re: [PEDA] Urgent help needed

2001-10-24 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:52 AM 10/24/01 +0200, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote: Maybe that the reference point for the .lib part moved for whatever reason. This can cause the component to be placed out of the working area after update PCB operation. Good thinking. Yes, that would do it, and it is not a terribly uncommon

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 04:15 PM 10/24/01 +0100, Stephen Smith wrote: I've already given up, and done it the standard way. I tried drawing it at 45 degrees as a library symbol, but the pins still had to be at 90 degrees. I was just designing a matrix, with about 50 odd diodes, and thought it might be easier to rotate

Re: [PEDA] Component Rotation

2001-10-24 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:11 PM 10/24/01 -0500, Cliff Ober wrote: There's a number of new PC motherboards coming out with the large (500 balls) Northbridge chip rotated by 45 degrees - it can ease compliance with the high speed bus constraints required for these designs. Component, i.e, footprint, rotation is not

Re: [PEDA] macro SetTextAt

2001-10-24 Thread Ian Wilson
Richard , My very quick test suggests that the documentation for the process is incorrect or that there is a bug. I think you should refer it to Protel Tech Support and get them to tell you what the correct parameters are - I have copied this email to them and they usually seem to reply to

Re: [PEDA] Urgent help needed

2001-10-24 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:07 PM 24/10/2001 -0700, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said: At 07:52 AM 10/24/01 +0200, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote: Maybe that the reference point for the .lib part moved for whatever reason. This can cause the component to be placed out of the working area after update PCB operation. Good thinking.

Re: [PEDA] Polygon Repour in 99SE

2001-10-24 Thread Ian Wilson
On 10:37 AM 24/10/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does anyone know how to force an update of all the polygons in a design? When you delete, add, or move objects the polygons don't always update. In larger designs with many polygons on many layer, I have turned off the polygon repour off

Re: [PEDA] Urgent help needed

2001-10-24 Thread ICT Mail
Ian, it's actually pretty easy to loose parts. We recently have had a situation where a group of components have been unknowingly moved into the negative region of the database as part of a move selection process early in the placement stage. It turns out that the syncroniser matches the parts

Re: [PEDA] Urgent help needed

2001-10-24 Thread Ian Wilson
At 10:09 AM 25/10/01 +1000, you wrote: Ian, it's actually pretty easy to loose parts. We recently have had a situation where a group of components have been unknowingly moved into the negative region of the database as part of a move selection process early in the placement stage. It turns out