Re: smtp times out

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
kamesh jayachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @40003b140df82d486e1c /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: error in loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory If you run qmail-smtpd under softlimit or some other memory limiting mechanism, the

Re: 40 simultaneous qmail-smtpd

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to create a server to do just mailing. I installed the qmail and right now I'm trying to optimize it so it can handle huge amount of mailing which will be handle by ezmlm. My first question is about qmail-smtpd and qmail-qmtpd 1. what's the difference and

Re: badmailfrom file and subdomains

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
audit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been working on getting my badmailfrom file setup and would like to block a entire domain from connecting. badmailfrom won't block anyone from *connecting*. I've tried the following @*.domain.net Nope. badmailfrom doesn't support domain wildcards. I would

Re: QMQP - mini qmail

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. tcpserver -x /etc/qmqp.cdb -u 7770 -g 2108 0 628 qmail-qmqpd I need to add this to the boot script. First I'm kinda confused. Now I have /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file for smtp server, can I run this and qmqp server at the same time so I would have

Re: Advanced masquerading

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
Marek Szuba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The thing is: there is a host called stargate.net.local doing IP masquerading for a LAN, which is known to the outside world as zone13.outside.net. I'd like to set up qmail on this host in such a way that: - all the mail sent from stargate to any other

Re: smtpd times out

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
kamesh jayachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Everything was working fine before applying qmail-ldap-1.03-20010501.patch to qmail-1.03 and building.Now after applying the patch,rebuilding,stopping qmail and restarting,the telnetting to port 25 timesout immedeately. Times out immediately? That's

unsubscribing (Was: QMQP - mini qmail)

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
Lukasz Gogolewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do i get off this list? Sigh. This has become such a FAQ that I'm reposting the detailed instructions: First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit. Then follow these directions. The kit will most likely be the standard

Re: Virtualdomains setup?

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Joan Picanyol i Puig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to set up a virtualdomain user joan should get all mail for cancortina.com, so I set up: joan:/home/joan # cat /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts localhost grummit.earth 213.97.212.86 tuixent21.com cancortina.com joan:/home/joan # cat

Re: setting a custom environment var

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm playing with a privacy gateway for whois records. To make a long story short I want to be able act based on which remote mail server is sending me the message. Looking at the environment when I pipe to a perl script I see nifty settings such as DTLINE,

Re: preventing local delivery

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
David Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the proper way to configure qmail so it does not attempt local delivery, even when a specific host is given in the email address? Leave control/locals empty. For example, if mail is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want it to actually be delivered to

Re: Forward a message to me and another account

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want that all the mail directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone is my real user on the server with qmail, someone1 is my backup user. How i can do this redirection? In ~someone/.qmail: ./Maildir/ [EMAIL

Re: postfix/qmail best for message tracking through system

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Mark Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A central requirement of the mailing engine is that it can be used to track the delivery status of messages through the system (i.e. if I send message A and then message B to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and message A bounces, whilst message B is received, I need to

Re: relay problem

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Radoslaw Tomczyszyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using qmail with tcpserver and have some problems with relay. I set all needed sets of relay in tcp.smtp and qmtp.tcp With masquerade ips it works fine - no problem but i want to relay other class of ip 195.205.148. I wrote to files (tcp.smtp

Re: setting a custom environment var

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2001, Dave Sill wrote: You can parse that from the Received fields. That's my plan of last resort. I didn't want to do this unless I really had to because of the different formats the Received headers can have, and that there can be any

Re: SV: relay problem

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
P=E5l Fr. Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SoHOW THE F.. DO I UNSUBSCRIBE, from this...amazing mail-list =3F PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ! Every message sent to the list contains the field: Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm -Dave

RE: postfix/qmail best for message tracking through system

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Mark Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know if there's any way I can extend the VERP thing so that I can insert a unique message-ID into the return address or similar? qmail-inject supports two kinds of VERP: per-recipient and per-message. Per-recipient VERP's encode the recipient's

Re: list got quite

2001-05-25 Thread Dave Sill
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you get the messages of changes to the crypto web site, you get to see an update when DJB adds the event description to his web page. You won't get this until his machine is back up, but in this case I knew not to expect any list messages for about a

Re: doublebounceto ignored??

2001-05-18 Thread Dave Sill
David Boone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to get rid of annoying doublebounceto emails I get as a=20 result of spam, I did an echo doublebounce =20 /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto and an echo '#' =20 ~alias/.qmail-doublebounce in an effort to stop them from being=20 delivered to postmaster.

Re: Problems using qmail

2001-05-17 Thread Dave Sill
Alle[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I'm alessandro from Italy Welcome. I'm Dave from Tennessee, USA. I'm using Qmail with XINETD, and it *works* Are you sure? :-) When I send a mail to someone, qmail appends a to the end of the TO field, so if the the recipients' email is [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: qmail ignores my sorry ass...

2001-05-17 Thread Dave Sill
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Run your injection job again with a load that will cause it to fail, but strace/truss it this time. Capture the output of that to a logfile. Post the logfile to the list. Better yet, post a URL to the logfile since it'll probably be huge. -Dave

Re: Another question

2001-05-17 Thread Dave Sill
Kennie J. Cruz-Gutierrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user exists and it's a valid shell account, but gives this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) From man qmail-getpw: qmail-getpw considers an account in /etc/passwd to be a

Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Dave Sill
John Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you people please stop sending me you didn't read the docs email.. I DID.. if I didn't I probably would have never got qmail up and running in the first place.. Then either you didn't read the right docs or you didn't understand them. I'm am whole heartly

Re: how to test for a qmail virtualdomain?

2001-05-16 Thread Dave Sill
Jason R. Mastaler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an incoming message is part of a qmail virtualdomain or not? I think you'll have to parse control/virtualdomains. I've been looking at qmail-send's environment variables under both a

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-15 Thread Dave Sill
Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't be hard to configure your Gnus to add the mail-followup-to header for this list. Better yet, create a file containing a list of mailing lists, e.g.: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... And set the QMAILMFTFILE environment variable

Re: problem

2001-05-15 Thread Dave Sill
colette tostivint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail runs without problems and i give a new route and new interface it doesn't run Why? What do you mean by doesn't run? Network reconfiguration won't stop qmail processes from running. -Dave

Re: Using vchkpw (vpopmail) with qmail-pop3d?

2001-05-15 Thread Dave Sill
Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get the smtp after pop authentication part of vpopmail to work. I followed the LWQ instructions to install qmail and I'm using qmail-pop3d. Where should the below startup line for vchkpw be placed? In qmail-pop3d/run. See:

Re: qmail retry

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Sill
Jamyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $qmail_home/control/concurrencyremote The number you insert into this file determines how many remote sockets/connections at a time your mail server will open. Yes. $qmail_home/control/concurrencylocal The number you insert

RE: QMail autostart problem

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Sill
Neil Whittington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The default run level is 3. The links created are: ln -s ../init.d/svscan S89svscan in rc3.d and rc5.d ln -s ../init.d/svscan K12svscan in rc0.d rc1.d rc2.d and rc6.d So you're starting svscan at runlevel 3. Is it running after the system

Re: newbie question with concurrency remote

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Sill
Michael Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running qmail on: RedHat 6.2 256 Mb Ram I set concurrency remote = 150... however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in queue and

Re: SMTP_AUTH

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had some instructions on how to test the server with the AUTH cmd through checkpasswd ( I only tested plain at the time) which I can no longer find - it work as outlines and put me in my home dir. Since I have upgraded I need to retest the server. Right now under AUTH

Newbies vs. arrogant experts (was: Newbie with tcpserver)

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Sill
[Barry, the Re[2] syntax your mailer uses is non-RFC-compliant.] Barry Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all: This is the most arrogant list I have come across. All the other lists that I'm on help out beginners with a short answer (we were all beginners once ... ), but here the beginner

Re: QMail autostart problem

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Sill
Neil Whittington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created my svscan and qmail startup scripts (see below) in the = init.d directory and set their permissions. In the rcX.d directories, I have set up the link to svscan (eg ln =96= s ../init.d/svscan K12svscan ) Which links did you create=3F

Re: remote smtp problem

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When ever a remote client tries to send mail thru my qmail box, qmail appends a question mark to the end of the domain i.e Sorry, I couldn't find any host named rbi.co.uk?. (#5.1.2) Clients injecting messages via SMTP? Using selective relaying? I'd guess that

Re: pop3 connection reset after exactly 1 minute

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Sill
Jens Hassler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same problem. After exactly 1 minute the connection resets. Try strace'ing the qmail-pop3d process. I didn't recompile QMail though, just copied the binaries. Maybe there's a problem with one of my compiled files? What files are involved in a POP3 session?

Re: Daemontools Supervise

2001-05-08 Thread Dave Sill
Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For which way could I know if daemontools is installed already? If you've got /usr/local/bin/supervise, you've probably got daemontools. On Red Hat, you could check for an RPM: rpm -qa | grep daemontools What supervise qmail-send, supervise

Re: SMTP AUTH and TLS

2001-05-07 Thread Dave Sill
Joshu=E9 Mart=EDn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But when I tried to apply the two patches to Qmail sources (f= irst=20 the TLS patch and then the AUTH), the second patch rejects parts of th= e AUTH patch. I tried to apply manually the parts of the patch that were rejected, but the resultant

Re: linebreak handling / qmail-inject

2001-05-07 Thread Dave Sill
Sascha Dahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I considered that qmail seems to make a difference between DOS and UNIX style linebreaks (\r\n AND \n) when sending mails from localhost. qmail runs on UNIX systems, and UNIX systems use newlines, not CR-LF. Is this the usual behaviour of qmail? Yes. That

Re: Can MX record be CNAME?

2001-05-04 Thread Dave Sill
q question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was appalled when [Charles] said please don't post BIND zonefiles to Dan's lists. That is a blanket directive that is not necessarily shared by everyone on this list, certainly not me. directive request A few lines of zone records speaks volumes for

Re: Can MX record be CNAME?

2001-05-04 Thread Dave Sill
q question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: END OF DISCUSSION Sorry, q, but I'm not ready to end the discussion, despite your declaration. Dave Sill wrote: q question [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was appalled when [Charles] said please don't post BIND zonefiles to Dan's lists. That is a blanket

Re: ANN: qmail delivery speed comparison graphs available

2001-04-27 Thread Dave Sill
Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main work at concurrencyremote=500 was finished after about 1250 seconds, at concurrencyremote=150 it was finished after about 1450 seconds; concurrencyremote=250 is in between at about 1350 seconds. I think that's because you're not just measuring the

Re: Qmail, double-bounces, and RFC2821

2001-04-27 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick J. LoPresti) wrote: This is the new RFC which supersedes RFC821 as the SMTP specification: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html The grammar in sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 appears not to permit [] as the domain portion of a mailbox in an address. In particular, the

Re: lower concurrency on _certain_ domains?

2001-04-27 Thread Dave Sill
Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run mailinglists.org and have come to find out that they way that AOL is determining that I am a spammer (I'm not), is the number of concurrent connections into AOL. Is there any way to lower the concurrency rate on a single domain (AOL.com) while leaving

Re: Trying to install qmail

2001-04-23 Thread Dave Sill
|nix ZixinG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Visit this site. His QMAIL howto is simply the best http://www.enixus.com.sg/~simbajaj/documents/ascii/qmail-HOWTO After a quick look I'm not too impressed. If you follow his directions, you'll likely end up with the qmail sendmail setuid root. And

Re: Backup

2001-04-23 Thread Dave Sill
From http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html#backups: How do I back up and restore the queue disk? Answer: You can't. One difficulty is that you can't get a consistent snapshot of the queue while qmail-send is running. Stop qmail first. And kick off all the users to prevent new messages

Re: qmail-pop3d not working?

2001-04-23 Thread Dave Sill
Mark Delany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might want to feed this back to the faqts people. Let's others benefit from what you've learnt. It's fixed. -Dave

Re: Can I use qmail-pop3d for both mbox and maildir format?

2001-04-23 Thread Dave Sill
Michael Cheung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I use qmail-pop3d for both mbox and maildir format? No, but SolidPOP handles both: http://solidpop3d.pld.org.pl/ -Dave

Re: alias with maildir

2001-04-19 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just set up Qmail to use Maildir. It is working fine sending to an existing user. The problem is it cannot send to the alias mailbox such as ~alias/.qmail-postmaster. I think I'm missing something. I've already touched and chmod 644 ~alias/.qmail-postmaster. It

Re: an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries ???

2001-04-16 Thread Dave Sill
Adam Andrzej Jaworski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) - we have to use system accounts qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just provides a more general

Re: defaultdelivery method seperate from /var/qmail/rc ?

2001-04-12 Thread Dave Sill
"Steven Katz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does Life with qmail suggest separating the defaultdelivery from the /var/qmail/rc file? The advantage isn't obvious to me. If defaultdelvery is just "./Maildir/" or some other simple one-liner, there's not much advantage other than putting all the

Re: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail

2001-04-12 Thread Dave Sill
John Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am missing something in my settings, but I just can't find what it is. What you're missing is that you should be using tcpserver. I tried using tcpserver and that worked for allowing selective relaying, but connections to any port from systems other than

Re: RFCs?

2001-04-12 Thread Dave Sill
Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:44:10AM -0700, David Benfell wrote: I keep hearing rumblings about how Dan plays fast and loose with the RFCs in qmail and his other programs. All I know is I'm a happy qmail (and djbdns and publicfile and ezmlm+idx) user.

qmail rewrite in progress

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Sill
In comp.security.unix, [EMAIL PROTECTED], DJB wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. J. Bernstein) Subject: Re: sendmail replacement? Newsgroups: comp.security.unix Date: 10 Apr 2001 20:22:36 GMT Organization: IR Daniel Roesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Qmail development is _dead_ since years. A

Re: Where are my aliases?

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Sill
"KEVIN ZEMBOWER" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to determine how to control where mail gets forward to when mailed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (one of my hosts). 1. africaalive.org is a CNAME for virtual.jhuccp.org. (This seems to be backwards in the DNS, where looking up virtual.jhuccp.org

Re: Again on Mail-Follow-Up plus other...

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Sill
Marco Calistri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I create $HOME/.lists which contains the mailing list rcpt@domain this file has chmod 644 chown user chgrp user, then I firstly add these lines into $HOME/.bash_profile, then into /etc/profile because I get no the result: # .bash_profile # Get the

Re: Problem forwarding/keeping copies with .qmail

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Sill
Rafael Angarita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to forward all the messages received by an user and keep copies in his local Maildir, the local copies are working fine but the forward is not. I tested the .qmail file running qmail-local manually and in this case everything worked

Re: A strange behavior.

2001-04-10 Thread Dave Sill
Kou Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: smtp2 tries to sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you enabling selective relaying on smtp2? If so, are you setting RELAYCLIENT to "smpt2.my.domain"? -Dave

Re: OpenBSD 2.8 You have new mail in /var/mail/root

2001-04-10 Thread Dave Sill
"Rick Updegrove" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am getting this message "You have new mail in /var/mail/root" every day on my new OpenBSD 2.8 machines running qmail. And are messages actually being delivered to /var/mail/root? If so, then you probably haven't replaced /usr/lib/sendmail (and/or

Re: Rewriting headers.

2001-04-10 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using QMail + MySQL. I have the need to handle two different domain, but which refer to the same mailboxes. With Sendmail and Postfix, I can instruct to rewrite domain1.it to domain2.it BEFORE queue processing. How can I do the same with QMail? MySQL patch provide

Re: virtual domain aliases problems...

2001-04-10 Thread Dave Sill
Geoffrey Gallaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently moved from sendmail to qmail-1.03. I'm having a few problems getting per-domain alias files working. [snip description of sendmail method] Now, with qmail I've installed fastforward and setup /etc/aliases to work correctly. The question is

Re: Upps.. :) Kernel parameters

2001-04-10 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I'm running the Qmail-1.03(big-todo.patch and big-concurrency.path) + Ezmlm-0.53 on Linux Debian Kernel 2.2.17 [snipped] The conf-spawn limit to 509! What does that mean? Did you set it to 1000 and find that it never spawned more than 509? Did you set it to 1000

Re: delay before checking mail with outlook

2001-04-09 Thread Dave Sill
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:17:04PM +, Ahmad Ridha wrote: Since the problem occurs so often, why aren't the -R and -H options made default? Perhpas it should also be included in LWQ. Is there any real disadvantage of using those options? They don't

Re: Mail cleansing program

2001-04-06 Thread Dave Sill
Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if there is a mail cleansing program out there that is configurable and mime-compliant. By mail cleansing program, I mean a program that can be instructed to only keep the text/plain part of a multipart/alternative message [Oh, I HATE people that

Re: authorized-relay

2001-04-06 Thread Dave Sill
"alexus" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I went to: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#authorized-relay and basicly did whatever they told me to i create a file /etc/tcp.smtp i put my ip my stuff in it then i did tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcp.smtp no errors were displayed

Re: Id SV respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes

2001-04-04 Thread Dave Sill
"Rick Updegrove" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am pretty sure that djb changed his instructions for daemontools http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html#boot and linux somewhat recently. Correct. It was definitely changed since LWQ was written. The first time I followed LWQ I overlooked the URL

Re: Selective Relaying Question

2001-04-04 Thread Dave Sill
John Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The above is the text format, I then ran this command: tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcp.smtp To make the binary. In an earlier message, John wrote: Here is the call from my tcpserver startup script: (PATH=/usr/local/qmail/bin;

Re: Be all, end all checkpasswd

2001-04-03 Thread Dave Sill
Dan Newcombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As much as I hate sendmail, after this response I may just go back to it if this is what the qmail "community" is like. Don't judge an entire community by the actions of one individual. -Dave

Re: dot qmail problem (HELP NEEDED URGENT)

2001-04-03 Thread Dave Sill
Wei Yao Gharib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 13266 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001 16:24:06 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 13259 invoked by uid 511); 2 Apr 2001 16:24:06 - Something is

RE: Never gets delivered?

2001-04-03 Thread Dave Sill
"Bill Andersen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent Reply!!! THIS is the type of reply I'd like to see in lieu of "Read Life With Qmail". Not rude, just informative. A suggestion to read LWQ isn't rude. It'd be nice if people took the time to provide a URL to the relevent section, though.

Re: Id SV respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes [PART II]

2001-04-03 Thread Dave Sill
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Beer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stopping qmail: svscan qmail logging. svc: warning: unable to chdir to /var/qmail/supervise/control: not a directory svc: warning: unable to chdir to /var/qmail/supervise/ok: not a directory svc: warning: unable to

RE: Never gets delivered?

2001-04-03 Thread Dave Sill
"Marcus Ouimet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the info requested. Thanks for taking the time read my e-mail. I have read through Life With Qmail and all faq's over and over. Not sure what I am missing here it is: Information for: /var/qmail/rc Tried: #!/bin/sh exec env -

Re: A real bouncesaying

2001-03-30 Thread Dave Sill
"Filip Salomonsson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A message is recieved for [EMAIL PROTECTED], delivered locally to salo-filip, which puts the message in my maildir and forwards a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The envelope sender for the forwarded message is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED], just as the docs say

Re: faster than bcc

2001-03-29 Thread Dave Sill
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cat list.txt | xargs qmail-inject -a message.txt where list.txt is a list of addresses. Is this faster than bcc anyway? No. That creates one message per recipient--lots of disk I/O to do the same thing as one

Re: faster than bcc

2001-03-28 Thread Dave Sill
"Brett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember reading that the fastest way to send one email to a large number of people is through bcc. This was helpful to me because I'm not able to use a mailing list since the addresses I send to will be pulled dynamically from a database which is always

Re: Symbolic link to datemail?

2001-03-27 Thread Dave Sill
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Matt Simonsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you sure? Is this wrong? http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167/fid/208 Looks wrong to me. datemail is a trivial shell script which invokes sendmail. sendmail and qmail-inject take

Re: tcpserver

2001-03-27 Thread Dave Sill
Mustafa Mahudhawala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anybody used tcpserver for Qmail other services out there -- Of course. I am using FreeBSD 4.2 and want to start my basic services like telnetd, ftpd along with smtp pop3 etc using tcpserver (and tcpserver.conf) instead of plain tcpserver or

RE: VERP problems

2001-03-23 Thread Dave Sill
"Brett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Sill wrote: No, you're not messing anything up. There are two kinds of bounces: those generated remotely and those generated locally. If the local system is not able to pass a message off to a remote system, the bounce generated will be local-

Re: me contents

2001-03-23 Thread Dave Sill
Flash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /var/qmail/control/me currently contains 'ns1.flashsys.com' which was picked up by the config script at compile time. For appearances sake in the headers I would like 'me' to contain 'mail.flashsys.com' instead. Will I break anything if I edit the file? Look at:

RE: New to Qmail, probably a stupid question...

2001-03-23 Thread Dave Sill
"Tyrone Mills" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, I should have included the logs, but the machine couldn't E-Mail... I was about to ftp them over when I realized the problem. I had a bad hostname for the machine, as soon as I fixed it, it's happily sending mail to the Internet. Mail may be

Re: qmail queue

2001-03-23 Thread Dave Sill
"Sumith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I know how many concurrent qmail deliveries are taking place on my qmail server, both qmail-local and qmail-remote Look at your qmail-send logs. You should see something like: @40003abb67f02a8b74e4 status: local 0/60 remote 14/500 where

Re: non local users

2001-03-23 Thread Dave Sill
"Dean Mumby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it possible to have nonlocal user mail forwarded to my isp mail server we have two offices each with dialup access and share a domain A specific example of what you want to do would be helpful. What you want do to is almost certainly doable, but how it'd

Re: VERP problems

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Sill
"Brett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to implement VERP for my own user address, that is, an address that's not a mailing list. I found a VERP page (quoted below) and according to that I should touch ~/.qmail-me-owner and ~/.qmail-me-owner-default. Then if I set the QMAILINJECT

Re: LWQ and POP3

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Sill
"Neafevoc K. Marindale" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just setup qmail using Life with qmail, and everything seems to be working just fine. But I wanted to use POP3 with it, and somehow trying to add pop3d to tcpserver just isn't working. I'm still sort of new to he *nix world. Btw, I'm using

Re: same VERP problem

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Sill
"Brett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still having the same annoying problem with the VERP implementation. How do I get it running on my home email address? That is, all emails I send out from [EMAIL PROTECTED], if bounced, I want sent back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Did you read my reply?

RE: VERP problems

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Sill
"Brett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, but the bounce sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also gets bounced. It doesn't know to send 'me-*' eamil through to 'me' even though I've touched ~/.qmail-me-owner and ~/.qmail-me-owner-default and chmodded both to 777. Try touching .qmail-default. Neither

Re: qmail install troubles

2001-03-21 Thread Dave Sill
Ruprecht Helms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: possible the things will be logged in /var/log mail. I think this is the default. The entry in syslog can malfunction. He said he's following the HOWTO, which logs to /var/log/qmail using multilog. Then I stumbled across the fact that I needed .qmail

Re: Trouble with qmail on Redhat 6.2

2001-03-20 Thread Dave Sill
"Iain Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The run file for qmail-smtpd is: #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID='is -u qmaild' NOFILESGID='id -g qmaild' MAXSMTPD='cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming' Should be back quotes (`) not single quotes ('). -Dave

Re: Log's.

2001-03-19 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to get qmail to produce more readable logs somewhat similar to sendmail's logs? Use matchup from qmailanalog: http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#qmailanalog -Dave

Re: MAIL FROM: #@[]

2001-03-19 Thread Dave Sill
"Jamin A. Brown" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm noticing a fair amount of spam coming into our system where the sending server is using MAIL FROM: #@[]. Really? Where's it coming from? Sure you're not seeing this in double bounces? -Dave

Re: qmail logs?

2001-03-16 Thread Dave Sill
Sumith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to scan my qmail log files for generating an html report. Since this rpms use multilog, I am using isoqlog for getting my job done. But the Install files says that you need to feed this in qmail-send log directory. There is no qmail-send in /var/service.

Re: Getting POP3d to record logging information in places other than Maillog

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
Sean Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I am using qmail-1.03+patches.tar.gz, ... qmail + patches qmail This kind of confusion and the resulting support nightmare is exactly what Dan is trying to avoid with his distribute-unmodified-source-only distribution terms. I'm sure this

Re: ETRN / SLOW

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
richard morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is anyone familiar with the use of the ETRN command? Yeah, familiar enough to know that qmail doesn't implement it. -Dave

Re: What are these messages mean?

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
"Chrisanthy Carlane" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Return-Path: #How come there is no return path? Because it's a bounce message. This is normal. Received: (qmail 25396 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2001 02:18:21 - Received: from unknown (HELO sales) (10.10.10.127) #I think the HELO should

Re: domain rewrites

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
Benjamin Collar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I rewrite a domain name on some incoming mail before passing it on? Better question is why would you want to? For instance, the company I'm working for used to receive its mail at mail.aaa.com. Now it only wants aaa.com. This is not a virtual

Re: POP3 Question

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
"Kirti S. Bajwa" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question is too fundamental for all you qmail experts, but please reply anyway. I am a newbie. I installed qmail on a RH 6.2 LINUX system by following step-by-step guidelines of QMAIL-HOWTO ( I have also consulted Life with Qmail). Two questions:

Re: qmail postfix

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thx for the info. What I was curious about was also how qmail scales. For example, it requires patches sometimes. Rarely. IMHO, people are way to eager to install unnecessary patches. Apparently with large mailinglists the bigtodo patch is needed.

Re: domain rewrites

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
Benjamin Collar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Putting mail.aaa.com in rcpthosts and local would just tell qmail that it's okay to move the mail along, right? That, then, wouldn't solve the explosion problem. No, that would try to deliver the mail locally. If it's impossible then the client won't

RE: Yet another weird POP3 problem

2001-03-07 Thread Dave Sill
"Kirti S. Bajwa" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my case this approach will not work. I am starting qmail at boot from /service directory using under svscan. I am not using the script as you have suggested. In may case qmail is running fine, I can receive messages in user's directories. Look as

Re: running qmail from /supervise

2001-03-05 Thread Dave Sill
"Neil Grant" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am doing another qmail install and this time I have a /supervise directory for dnscache, so I thought it would make sense to run qmail from there, I am following lwq (most of the time). So I was wondering if anyone had already adapted the lwq start up

Re: Problem receiving email.

2001-03-05 Thread Dave Sill
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not being run as root. qmaill1922 0.0 1.0 1100 320 ?S18:36 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/smtpd That's multilog, not qmail-smtpd. Connect to port 25, then do the ps again. -Dave

Re: running qmail from /supervise

2001-03-05 Thread Dave Sill
"Gerrit Pape" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 09:07:19AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: Assuming you're running svscan on /service (not /supervise) already, e.g. from inittab, you could change the "start" section in the script to: echo -n "Starti

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >