Hello Matt -
As always I will need to see a copy of the configuration file together
with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 20:36 Australia/Melbourne, Matt Taylor
wrote:
Hi,
We seem to have developed an issue along the way som
Hi,
We seem to have developed an issue along the way somewhere where simultaneous use
checking broke and is no longer being honoured. We use Radiator 3.6 in Emerald mode on
a Platypus backend. The system used to check the session database and rigidly enforce
the limits indicated in Platypus. Fo
Hello William -
On Thursday, Feb 13, 2003, at 11:06 Australia/Melbourne, William Taylor
wrote:
OK heres what I want to do:
I would like to use Simultaneous-Use to limit ports to users.
I read that you are supposed to use it as a check item.
Im using a PostAuthHook called addReply to add cert
OK heres what I want to do:
I would like to use Simultaneous-Use to limit ports to users.
I read that you are supposed to use it as a check item.
Im using a PostAuthHook called addReply to add certain attibutes to the
reply based on whats in my database. It will also reject users that are
mailbo
Hello Michael -
To do what you describe, you will need to specify a
"DefaultSimultaneousUse 1" in your AuthBy clause, then add different
"Simultaneous-Use" check items for those users with different limits
(Note: do *not* specify "MaxSessions ..").
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, Jan 2, 2003, at
Looking at implementing simultaneous use using Nas
Types in the radiator configuration file
My question is if you put a radius attirbute in for
a particular user that allows say 2 concurrent sessions. Will it override the
global simultaneous use clause for just that user (I am hoping this is
Hello everyone,
I'm testing 3.1 using radpwtst. And I've noticed the message "INFO:
Access rejected for whr: Simultaneous-Use of 2 exceeded" in the
radius.log. The message is correct. The problem is that RADONLINE shows
there are 3 logins.
radpwtst -trace -s localhost -user whr -password x -aut
Hey again everyone,
Thanks for all the tips for my previous emails. I'm having a problem with
Simultaneous-Use checking. The DefaultSimultaneoususe item is set to 1,
but with users that are supposed to have more than one simultaneous login,
as denoted by the Check item in the user flat file.
Hi All,
We r using Radiator with the Platypus and As5300 ... i hve made some
users in users file with simultaneous use 2. they were working fine but
suddenly stops working ... but when i restarts radiator ... the user
get connected with two simultaneous sessions ... i m attaching the
debug tr
I'm using AuthEMERALD.pm and Platypus 3.0 along with
Radiator 2.18.2 for authentication system.
I was working with the Simultaneous-Use, but I don't
see wehre the code in AuthEMERALD.pm checks either the
ServerPorts table or the CallsOnline view.
There is a trigger on my accounting table (Ca
Hello Jonathon -
I will need to see the trace debug from Radiator to see what is going on.
thanks
Hugh
At 9:34 -0700 01/7/6, Jonathon Lindbo wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have been trying for the past 4 days to get my Simultaneous Login
>restrictions to work. I am currently working with PM3's and have
e the cgi to see who RADIATOR thinks is
online.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathon Lindbo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous Use Problems
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I have been trying for the past 4 days to get my Simultaneous Login
restrictions to work. I am currently working with PM3's and have SNMP
enabled on them all. I'm not sure what I am doing wrong. Below is the
config that I am using. Any ideas ? Where should I look for debugging
inform
Hello James -
Use different Handlers, one for your news server and one for your other
authentication with appropriate AuthBy's and DefaultSimultaneousUse.
hth
Hugh
On Friday 11 May 2001 12:15, James Laszko wrote:
> We use authentication on our news servers for our customers. When a
> custom
We use authentication on our news servers for our customers. When a
customer tries to connect to the news server, it fires of a RADIUS
request to our Radiator server. We've got Simultaneous-Use limited to 1
port. How can I go about skipping Simultaneous-Use checks based on what
NAS IP is making
Hello Janet -
What you are trying to do below will not work. Two different session
databases are for two different populations of users, and the same username
can exist in both, but subject to different limits.
If you want to check both session databases, you will have to write some
custom c
Hi Everyone,
I'm wondering if Simultaneous Use checks different SessionDatabases.
I'm using 2 SessionDatabases in my cfg file - (1) DSL Users, (2) Regular
Dialup. However, I'm testing logging in at the same time and the same
user is getting connected DSL and dialup.
Can anybody help?
Thanks,
J
Hello David -
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, David Moya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an DBM session database and I'm having problems with Simultaneous-Use
> parameter.
>
> I have configured Simultaneous-Use = 1 in the main Realm and user by user too,
> but it doesn't works. Where's the problem? It's possible
Hi,
I have an DBM session database and I'm having problems with Simultaneous-Use
parameter.
I have configured Simultaneous-Use = 1 in the main Realm and user by user too,
but it doesn't works. Where's the problem? It's possible to simulated this
with radpwtst -nostop?
Thank you for you help.
D
Help!
I'm currently running Radiator 2.15 and I found that simultaneous-use
only works sometimes. So, I read the revision history of 2.16 that
there was a fix. Well, I'm testing simultaneous-use and it would still
fail if I would login with a suffix (+ppp) for the newest release -
2.16.3.
Hello Philip -
I replied to this mail last week.
>
> I have some question regarding the entire radius system what =
> creates the session-id is it the radius daemon or the terminal servers.
>
The terminal server (NAS) creates the session-id.
> Another question, I have a prob
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:10:27 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Buckley)]
>From mikem Wed Oct 18 01:10:22 2000
Received: by oscar.open
Hello Charlie -
There are a number of options, depending on what exactly you want to do.
Basically, Radiator can use a session database to control individual
simulataneous use, or it can use the AuthBy PORTLIMITCHECK clause to do much
more sophisticated port limit checking. You should have a loo
Hello All,
I've noticed that quite often the above subject will come up. People are
interested in either allowing or not allowing the use of multiple ports by
the same user. We have always used other means (maxstat, pmmon) to control
port use but now it looks as though we will need to use Radi
> Thanks in advance.
> William
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 10:37 PM
> To: William Hernandez; Radiator
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-use in 2.15
>
>
>
> Hello William -
>
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-use in 2.15
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:35:06 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0
Hello Chris -
> >
> >On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, David Lloyd wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> > >
> > > > A better approach to maintaining session database coherency is to use
> > > > strict checking of the NAS. This is what the NasType parameter is used
> > > > for in the Client
Hello Chris -
>
> >On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> >
> > > A better approach to maintaining session database coherency is to use
> > > strict checking of the NAS. This is what the NasType parameter is used
> > > for in the Client clauses (see section 6.4.5 in the Radiator 2.16.1
> > >
07210935034Z.00896@hugo>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<0007210935034Z.00896@hugo>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:27:12 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use Problems - IMPORTANT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&
ECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:20:52 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use Problems - IMPORTANT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
rpt from our radius.log file.
> >
> > The use "hmcalixto" was already logged in on max3 at
> > Wed Jul 19 12:11:59 2000: Login OK: [hmcalixto] (max3)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> > William
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hugh Irv
Hello David -
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, David Lloyd wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> > A better approach to maintaining session database coherency is to use
> > strict checking of the NAS. This is what the NasType parameter is used
> > for in the Client clauses (see section 6.4.5
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> A better approach to maintaining session database coherency is to use
> strict checking of the NAS. This is what the NasType parameter is used
> for in the Client clauses (see section 6.4.5 in the Radiator 2.16.1
> reference manual). Note that there is a
, July 20, 2000 3:48 AM
To: William Hernandez; Radiator
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-use in 2.15
Hello William -
Thanks for sending the log file.
The log shows that the user is indeed being rejected by the first AuthBy
clause, but your configuration file has an AuthByPolicy of
ContinueUnt
0 7:32 PM
> To: William Hernandez; Radiator
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-use in 2.15
>
>
>
> Hello William -
>
> I will need to see a trace 4 debug as well as what you have sent this time.
>
> thanks
>
> Hugh
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Willia
Hello everyone -
Thanks to the other members of the list who have posted follow ups to this
message. I thought I might take this opportunity to address the
Simultaneous-Use issue again.
The thing to keep in mind here is that Radiator can only go on what it sees
reported by the NAS equipment tha
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Jeremy Gault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running Radiator (its either the 2.13 series or 2.14) and
> 3Com Total Control HiPer ARC terminal servers. We're having a problem
> with the Simultaneous-Use feature.
> Our regular dialup customers (and 64K ISDN) accounts are
, July 18, 2000 7:32 PM
To: William Hernandez; Radiator
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-use in 2.15
Hello William -
I will need to see a trace 4 debug as well as what you have sent this time.
thanks
Hugh
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, William Hernandez wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Hello,
I have this problem occasinality with my dial-up users. It seems Radiator
some times does not erase the user from the current logged table (used to
check the simultaneous use). So, I shutdown the server and start it again
and all works fine.
I change my Radiator setup to use a database f
Hi,
We are running Radiator (its either the 2.13 series or 2.14) and
3Com Total Control HiPer ARC terminal servers. We're having a
problem with the Simultaneous-Use feature.
Our regular dialup customers (and 64K ISDN) accounts are given
a Simultaneous-Use of 1, thus allowing t
Hello William -
I will need to see a trace 4 debug as well as what you have sent this time.
thanks
Hugh
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, William Hernandez wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm having problems getting the simultaneous-use check item to work. I've
> tried using the internal SessionDatabase
Hello everyone,
I'm having problems getting the simultaneous-use check item to work. I've
tried using the internal SessionDatabase and an external SessionDatabase
(using mysql), but Radiator doesn't report a rejection on a second login
session either way.
I've attached my radius.cfg.
Some samp
Hello Adrian -
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple set up using Radiator 2.15 and with
> DefaultSimultaneousUse 1
> AccountingStopsOnly
> set in the AuthBy SQL clause.
>
>
Hi,
I have a simple set up using Radiator 2.15 and with
DefaultSimultaneousUse 1
AccountingStopsOnly
set in the AuthBy SQL clause.
However, when I set the Simultaneous-Use=2 i
Hello Jason -
>
> I am using Radiator-2.14.1 w/ Platypus using the RadiusNT extension and
> using AuthByEmerald in Radiator.
>
> I would like to make it so most AccountTypes are limited to 1 simultaneous
> login, while others are 2 or more simultaneous.
>
> (In the RadiusNT portion of Plat, a
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:40:26 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from ["Jason
Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>From mikem Fri Jun 16 07:40:19 2000
Received: by oscar.open.
Hello Sean -
>
> Anyone,
>
> Is there a way to completely turn off any session checking in radiator 2.15?
> According to the docs, if you leave out the SessionDatabase tags, radiator
> still uses an internal hash to track simultaneous logins. Is it as simple
> as excluding the Simultaneous-Us
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:40:14 +1000 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Sean
Rietze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>From mikem Thu Jun 1 09:40:10 2000
Received: by oscar.open.com
Hello -
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Le Anh Tuan wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm planning to use a NT 2000 Advance Server as a Remote Access
Server, authenticated by Radiator. Every thing works fine, a client can dialup
to NT 2000 with an attached multiport, authenticates and receives IP address
from Radiator
Hello,
I'm planning to use a NT 2000 Advance Server as a
Remote Access Server, authenticated by Radiator. Every thing works fine, a
client can dialup to NT 2000 with an attached multiport, authenticates and
receives IP address from Radiator. But one thing I can not configure is to
"limit Sim
Hello Brian -
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Brian Morris wrote:
> Just a thought...
>
> If the IP address was re-allocated later on wouldn't there be two entries in
> RADONLINE for it?
>
> You could possibly check for the IP address in radonline as well, if it is
> allocated twice - blow away the oldes
From: Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use - Using ping test
>
> Hi Clement -
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Clement
Hi Clement -
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Clement wrote:
> We are renting some ports from another ISP who does not allow us to do
> SNMP checking if a user is still on-line. Occassionally, an account
> close packet is lost and users will be locked out because Radiator
> "believes" the previous session
Hello Raju -
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Raju M. Daryanani wrote:
> Is it possible to set up Radiator so that maxsessions can be enforced across
> iPass as well as local dial-up?
>
Sure. Use either MaxSessions in the realm, or DefaultSimultaneousUse in the
AuthBy.
hth
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most
Is it possible to set up Radiator so that maxsessions can be enforced across
iPass as well as local dial-up?
TIA,
Raju
_
Raju M. Daryanani
Senior Project Manager
_
Asia Internet Ltd http://www.asiainter.net/
Hello 'Tunde -
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, 'Tunde Ogedengbe wrote:
> We set our DefaultSimulataneous-Use to 1 and set Simultaneous-Use to
> multiple for individuals granted multiple connections. The system however
> is rejecting multiple connection for the customers with Simultaneous-Use
> setting > 1
We set our DefaultSimulataneous-Use to 1 and set Simultaneous-Use to
multiple for individuals granted multiple connections. The system however
is rejecting multiple connection for the customers with Simultaneous-Use
setting > 1.
What can I do?
Tunde
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~ra
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use Broken?
I'm having a problem with the new version of radiator
such that it is rejecting more tha
Hello John -
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having a problem with the new version of radiator
> such that it is rejecting more than one usage of the same
> username in a handler even though there are no limits
> on how many of this particular username can login. I have
> ha
I'm having a problem with the new version of radiator
such that it is rejecting more than one usage of the same
username in a handler even though there are no limits
on how many of this particular username can login. I have
had this configuration working for over a year now, but
the new version o
On Nov 3, 8:27pm, Hugh Irvine wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use Freezes!
>
> Hello Sergio -
>
> On Wed, 03 Nov 1999, Sergio Gonzalez wrote:
> > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> > Hi there. Somebody can tell me
Hello Sergio -
On Wed, 03 Nov 1999, Sergio Gonzalez wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Hi there. Somebody can tell me how to make a flush of the internal user
> table radiator maintains when using simultaneous-use?.. I got someone
> hooked and
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Hi there. Somebody can tell me how to make a flush of the internal user
table radiator maintains when using simultaneous-use?.. I got someone
hooked and I can't make it hang up...
Exists some method to hang up someone wi
Hello Dawn -
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Dawn Lovell wrote:
> We've had two problems with concurrent login checking that I wanted to run
> by everyone. We're running 2.13.1 on a mix of Solaris 2.5.1 and Solaris 7
> boxes; we have the snmpget from UCD SNMP (v3.6). Please pardon my ignorance
> on some
We've had two problems with concurrent login checking that I wanted to run
by everyone. We're running 2.13.1 on a mix of Solaris 2.5.1 and Solaris 7
boxes; we have the snmpget from UCD SNMP (v3.6). Please pardon my ignorance
on some of the Radiator configuration options; I haven't actually been
Hello Derek -
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, Derek Sanderson wrote:
> >%_I use a default profile that does an AuthBy Platypus. in that default profile,
I specify that the MaxSessions 1. i have 2 or three customers that I would
like to up that MaxSession count. whats the easiest way to do that for just
I use a default profile that does an AuthBy Platypus. in
that default profile, I specify that the MaxSessions 1. i have 2 or three
customers that I would like to up that MaxSession count. whats the easiest
way to do that for just a couple customers.
thanks
Derek
Hello James -
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, James H. Thompson wrote:
> in the section:
> > > >
> > > > DefaultSimultaneosUse 1
> > > > Filename xxx
> > > >
>
> Do we not also need:
>
> NoDefaultIfFound
>
> If thats not present, then if Radiator finds a user in file xxx
ault entry and accept them.
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hi James.
>
> On Jun 17, 12:41pm, James H. Thompson wrote:
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> >
> > > Hi James.
> > >
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> But if the FR got up again can the Radius check if the users are still there ?
>
No, (unless the period of outage is very short and the NAS is still sending
retransmitted stops to the RADIUS server - most NAS have a limit on how
But if the FR got up again can the Radius check if the users are still there ?
tom minchin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > from the manual: "Radiator keeps track of the number of current sessions
> > for a user by counting the Accounti
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> Hi All
>
> from the manual: "Radiator keeps track of the number of current sessions
> for a user by counting the Accounting Start and Stop requests received
> for that user"
>
> What happened if one of my users is logging out whi
Hi All
from the manual: "Radiator keeps track of the number of current sessions
for a user by counting the Accounting Start and Stop requests received
for that user"
What happened if one of my users is logging out while my Frame relay
between my POP's is down.
as i know there will be no stop rec
fter the Auth request has already been denied?
Perhaps this clean up should happen on the auth request or on both
auth and acct?
Jim
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hi James.
>
> On Jun 17, 12:41pm, James H. Thompson wrote:
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous us
Hi James.
On Jun 17, 12:41pm, James H. Thompson wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
> > Hi James.
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2:21am, James H. Thompson wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hi James.
>
> On Jun 11, 2:21am, James H. Thompson wrote:
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> > Since the NAS reply items are different for each NAS, I'd have to setup
> > 3 full sets of check/reply items
Hi James.
On Jun 11, 2:21am, James H. Thompson wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> Since the NAS reply items are different for each NAS, I'd have to setup
> 3 full sets of check/reply items for each user. That sounds like
> too much work. How would I do it by
Hi James.
On Jun 12, 1:58am, James H. Thompson wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> In the Radiator manual at:
>
> http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ref.html#pgfId=330971
>
> in Section 14 it says:
>
> 14.0 Rewriting user names
>
> You can cha
In the Radiator manual at:
http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ref.html#pgfId=330971
in Section 14 it says:
14.0 Rewriting user names
You can change the User-Name attribute in each request by using the
RewriteUsername parameter. This allows you to apply separate rewriting
rules to the Use
l have to
> set up a full set of check and reply items for each special user. There are
> other ways to tackle this, involving chaining FILE authentication. Do you want
> to talk about that?
>
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Jun 10, 10:38pm, James H. Thompson wrote:
> > Subje
authentication. Do you want
to talk about that?
Cheers.
On Jun 10, 10:38pm, James H. Thompson wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use
> I have only a handful of users that are allowed to do 2 simultaneous
> logins. I want to restrict them to two logins, and everyone el
I have only a handful of users that are allowed to do 2 simultaneous
logins. I want to restrict them to two logins, and everyone else to one.
Will this work?
In the realm:
MaxSessions 1
In the users file:
#users with dual login priv
user1 Simultaneous-Use = 2
Fall-Through = y
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> OK, due to popular demand I have added a new parameter to AuthBy.
>
> DefaultSimultaneousUse specifies a sim-use limit that will apply if there is no
> user-specific Simultaneous-Use check item.
>
> Would the interested people like to download a new A
/downloads/patches-2.13.1 and let me know how it
goes. You will need to remove the MaxSessions parameter from your config too.
Cheers.
On Mar 23, 7:41am, Stephen Roderick wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use!!!
> On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
>
> > Im th
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Im thinking of doing exactly that, but Im toying with whether or not
> DefaultSessionMax (or whatever I call it) should be a Handler/realm parameter
> or an AuthBy parameter?
> MaxSession (for better or worse) is a Handler/Realm parameter.
>
> Views?
On Mar 22, 4:25pm, Stephen Roderick wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use!!!
> On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, True Communications Corp. wrote:
>
> > defined to 1 as the default for all users in the users file. I was under
the
> > impression
> > that you can override
I'm doing this by putting the Simultaneous-Use option in my database as a
check item. That way, each user gets their own sim-use setting. My
software is setup to give them 1 by default, but a change to the db can
give them whatever I need. That way, I don't have any Simultaneous-Use
option for
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, True Communications Corp. wrote:
> defined to 1 as the default for all users in the users file. I was under the
> impression
> that you can override the default for any of the users by using the
> Simultaneous-Use
> attribute in the users file. Which is exactly what I did.
W
Hello,
Radiator enforces the _most_restrictive_ of MaxSessions (for the realm) and
Simultaneous-Use (for a user)
I think that explains what you are seeing?
On Mar 22, 11:50am, True Communications Corp. wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use!!!
>
> Hello,
>
> I am tr
Hello,
I am trying to install Radiator on an IRIX 6.4 machine with a combination of
USR / cisco servers, and I have ran into the following problem. Any feedback
will be appreciated.
I have setup Radiator to use an Authby FILE module, with MaximumSession
defined to 1 as the default for all user
As far as what SQL I am using. I am using MySQL. I will send the log files later
on today.
..Rich
Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hi Rich.
>
> On Mar 16, 9:47am, Richard Hawley wrote:
> > Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous Use checking
> > Simultaneous Use checking does not seem
Hi Rich.
On Mar 16, 9:47am, Richard Hawley wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous Use checking
> Simultaneous Use checking does not seem to be working. I am not sure
> exactly why. I am using an SQL database with the following table
Can you send the Radiator log file at trac
Hi
I like the simultaneous use nature of radiator, but am wondering if
instead of throwing people off, it was possible to say log to a file or
even email the user is/session is etc of the people using the process
simultaneously. I have taken alook at the sessINTERNAl.pm package etc
etc, but was w
Simultaneous Use checking does not seem to be working. I am not sure
exactly why. I am using an SQL database with the following table
AuthColumnDef 0, User-Password, check
AuthColumnDef 1, Idle-Timeout, reply
AuthColumnDef 2, Session-Timeout, reply
AuthColumnDef 3, S
I have radiator running on a linux server using a mysql database. I
have Simultaneous-Use checking enabled but it is not working. What do I
need to add to enable the sim use checking? Thanks.
The database is as follows:
DBSourcedbi:mysql:dbname
DBUsername dbname
Mike,
>I have uploaded a new version of AuthEMERALD.pm for version 2.13. It will
now
>honour AuthSelect and AuthColumnDef. You will want to use it like this:
>
> AuthSelect ,sa.maxsessions
> AuthColumnDef 0,Simultaneous-Use,check
>
>You will have to add your maxsessions column to the SubAccounts
Hi Mike and all,
>Thanks for sending the config file. There is one immediate problem:
>
>AuthBy EMERALD does not honour AuthSelect and AuthColumnDef, so the
>Simultaneous-Use entries you have in your database are doing exactly
nothing at
>the moment.
Ok. I was confused because the documents say
On Feb 20, 1:10pm, Ricardo Freire wrote:
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use question
> Thanks to all!
>
> Now I understand this check item clearly.
>
> But I'm still in trouble:
> If I comment MaxSessions line, everyone can connect more than once at a
> t
-feira, 19 de Fevereiro de 1999 20:01
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use question
>I believe that which ever is lowest, takes affect. So if your Maxsessions
>is 1, and your Sim-Use is 2, it will only alow 1. However, in your users
>file, you can put Sim-Use = 1 for the DEFAULT users, and
Hi Ricardo.
Its the most restrictive (ie the smallest) of MaxSessions and Simultaneous-Use
that is used.
Hope that helps you understand whats going on.
Cheers.
On Feb 19, 4:16pm, Ricardo Freire wrote:
> Subject: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous-Use question
> Hi Mike,
>
> I think Simu
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
