Thank you for the assistance. I tried using the HTTPS URL, but I had to
encode both the username and password into the URL: just having the
username, or nothing, and filling in the Username/Password fields below
gave a No Repository error. I didn't feel comfortable having a password
visible in
Hi,
I wonder if anyone else has had this experience or can offer any
assistance ?
Over the weekend, the CentOS server I was running ReviewBoard (v1.7.16)
on under lighttpd was powered off and rebooted. It was previously
configured to use ActiveDirectory authentication which worked perfectly.
Hi Zachary,
It's trying to find a match based on the result of 'svn info'. If it can't
find a repository entry on Review Board that has a Path or Mirror Path
matching your local checkout, then it'll fail. This is a new tool, and we
probably should improve it in this case.
What I'd recommend is
Hi Rob,
Sounds like the Python Entrypoints we use to register the list of auth
backends (and other things) may have gone missing. That or your Python
modules for handling Active Directory, NIS and LDAP are missing. Most
likely, the upgrade broke something.
You can try re-installing the version
Oh, well that's better. I'm a novice sysadmin, so I'm never sure how much
of any given problem is a real problem, and how much is because I left
off the trailing / or something.
Thanks for the response!
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:40:43 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Zachary,
That being said, http://ReviewBoardServer/api/repositories *is* empty. And
I am given the impression that it shouldn't be. Was this something that was
dropped. I'm using RB 1.7.16.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting
Also, and I feel I may be abusing this opportunity to ask a third question:
Is there still a problem I should expect if a single server is hosting
multiple svn repositories? Or was that just an older version. Im looking
for documentation for it, but it's not coming to me easily.
On Tuesday,
Hi Zachary,
/api/repositories/ should not be empty so long as you've added more or more
repository configurations in Review Board and your user has access to them.
It's totally fine if a single server is hosting multiple SVN repositories.
Make sure to add the base of each repository (not a
Ah... The bases weren't added. It was sub-directories. That was the
problem. I added the base path, and re-tried 'rbt setup-repo --debug' and
got farther. Now, you mentioned name-based lookup with Subversion. Is this
the currently expected outcome?
- Create
Looks like perhaps it was unable to write to the current directory as your
user. The real error was masked by a bug in setup-repo, which I'll get
fixed for the release.
Name-based lookups are a different issue. I hope to have a release within
the next few hours. Trying to write out the release
Hi everyone,
We just put out RBTools 0.5.4. It has some bug fixes for rbt patch,
revision ranges with Git, and name-based repository lookups with Subversion.
The news post has more details at:
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/01/14/rbtools-0-5-4-released/
We're gearing up for a couple
I added USE_X_FORWARDED_HOST = True to settings_local.py, and I was
expecting to see this http://10.34.51.33/r/1/ http://localhost/r/1/ instead
of http://localhost/r/1/ in the email body.
Any idea how to make such change?
Regards,
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
This was the purpose of the site domain name. Go to the General Settings
page and set the domain there. It will update the Site entry. You may have
to reload Apache after doing this.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
It works :-). I was afraid to brake my db again
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message
Hey everyone,
One release for the day just isn't enough. We just released Review Board
1.7.21. It adds support for GitLab and Unfuddle, fixes a number of bugs,
adds some API improvements, and introduces a large optimization for large
diffs.
See the news announcement for more details:
Hello everyone,
It's release day! In addition to the new RBTools and Review Board releases,
we'd like to announce general availability for the Review Board Power Pack.
The Power Pack is a commercial add-on for Review Board which adds document
(PDF) review, support for GitHub Enterprise, and
Hi,
I've just upgraded RBTools to 0.5.4, and have a couple of questions:
1. When I tried to invoke post-review (yes, I still have to use that - see
the second question as to why) on a working copy which had some files
renamed, it printed the following message:
One or more files in your
Alexey,
Responses inline
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Alexey Neyman alexey.ney...@gmail.comwrote:
1. When I tried to invoke post-review (yes, I still have to use that - see
the second question as to why) on a working copy which had some files
renamed, it printed the following message:
Hi Alexey,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Alexey Neyman alexey.ney...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David,
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:27:32 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
Alexey,
Responses inline
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Alexey Neyman alexey...@gmail.comwrote:
1. When I tried
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Alexey Neyman alexey.ney...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for a detailed response.
One question on UUID - why can't it be
Comment #2 on issue 3190 by d...@cabo.dk: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
If I come up with a patch to fix this, would you accept it? I could either
make it extract the repository once per test run, or simply
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #3 on issue 3190 by chip...@gmail.com: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
Possibly, but it does make development more painful for us.
I'd like a better sense for why you're
Comment #4 on issue 3190 by d...@cabo.dk: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
Well, I've been looking into making it work with Mercurial and Perfarce, a
Perforce integration extension for Mercurial, but with no luck
Comment #5 on issue 3190 by chip...@gmail.com: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
Perforce would be good. Right now, there's a lot of work going on with
Mercurial support, so it's basically getting a complete
Comment #6 on issue 3190 by d...@cabo.dk: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
Well, I can always push from Mercurial to Git and post the review from
there… (Adding support for hg-git would be neat, but I haven't need
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3191 by bod...@gmail.com: consequent searches crash
with 'initVM() must be called first' error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3191
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in
Comment #7 on issue 3190 by d...@cabo.dk: Cannot checkout rbtools
repository using Mercurial
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3190
Here's an example patch: https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/5257/
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Comment #1 on issue 3191 by chip...@gmail.com: consequent searches crash
with 'initVM() must be called first' error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3191
PyLucene changes their API basically all the time. You need to have a
pretty
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 3191 by trowb...@gmail.com: consequent searches crash
with 'initVM() must be called first' error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3191
In fact, given that we're replacing the backend entirely, and pylucene bugs
are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 1702 by trowb...@gmail.com: Allow reviews of files, not
just of commits
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1702
This is now fixed in the master branch (and will ship in 2.0 beta 2). Text
files can be added as attachments
Comment #1 on issue 1757 by iander...@mac.com: MySQL support on Mac OS X
Server requires downloading the developer pieces
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1757
Mac OS X Server switched over to Postgres awhile ago so there's probably no
point in fixing this now.
--
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1757 by trowb...@gmail.com: MySQL support on Mac OS X
Server requires downloading the developer pieces
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1757
Sounds good to me.
--
You received this message because this project is
32 matches
Mail list logo
