Re: Feature request for review board

ted commit entry can be expanded with a click on the little '+' icon. After the expansion, it basically shows the git commit log in read only mode. I'm looking for an option (as a new feature request) to select a portion of this expanded commit log text (by mouse click and drag) and a

Re: Feature request for review board

Hi Pratyush, Thanks for the feature requests! For #1, are you wanting to just leave a comment attached to that commit entry itself? Or to a line in the commit description? To help me understand how we might design it, can you give me some use cases? For #2, we want to iterate on this UI a bit, b

Feature request for review board

Hi review board community, thank you for releasing the review board version 4.0.4, the multiple commit feature is very useful. While using the multiple commit I felt need of following two features: 1. Ability to add review comments against the commit log which are auto generated from git commi

Re: Feature Request: Pick which revision or upload to diff against

Hi Gabriel, I’m sorry, it did fall through the cracks. I’m still not sure I’m getting it. So right now, in Review Board, say you have this scenario: 1) Post a change for review (diff 1, based on #20) 2) Sync, make some further changes and post again (diff 2, now based on #21) The revision slide

Re: Feature Request: Pick which revision or upload to diff against

Hi Christian, I guess this question feel through the cracks, would it be possible to have your take on whether this feature will be added to RB in the future? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check ou

Re: Feature Request: Pick which revision or upload to diff against

Hi Christian, No, I'm specifically referring to this ReviewBoard limitation (documented at https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/users/reviews/reviewing-diffs/): Note > Due to the way that the diff viewer works,* if a newer diff is based on a > newer revision of a file, you may see other

Re: Feature Request: Pick which revision or upload to diff against

Hi Gabriel, I *think* the UI feature you're discussing is the same as our diff revision slider. Every time you upload a new diff for review (after making changes based on review feedback or otherwise iterating on the change), we give it a new diff upload revision on that review request. The diff v

Feature Request: Pick which revision or upload to diff against

Hi! I'm looking into using ReviewBoard with Perforce, and being used to CodeCollab I find that your product holds up surprisingly well in some aspects, in addition to having a slicker UI. One major useful feature in Collab however is the ability to change what you are diffing against when view

Re: Feature Request: Review markdown docs in repositories

Hi Mark, Thanks for recommending Review Board to others! It personally means a lot :) We have plans (and actually about half the work in place) to render files like this specially in the diff viewer. Markdown, images, PDFs. We’ve pushed the feature back a bit due to some other priorities and a fe

Feature Request: Review markdown docs in repositories

Hi, we have used Reviewboard for several years and I recommend it to every developer group I speak to. Recently there is lots of activity storing Markdown documents in repositories. GitHub and GitLab create a Readme.md file, and the GitLab wiki (based on https://github.com/gollum/gollum/wiki) s

Re: feature request: ability to suspend a review request

On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 6:29:43 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi James, > > I think this is an interesting idea. We'd need to talk about it more, see > how it'd fit into things, but it might be worth putting together. Either > natively or as an extension. > > A quicker option fo

Re: feature request: ability to suspend a review request

Hi James, I think this is an interesting idea. We'd need to talk about it more, see how it'd fit into things, but it might be worth putting together. Either natively or as an extension. A quicker option for now is to make use of the Note To Reviewers extension, which gives you a text field below

feature request: ability to suspend a review request

Every now and then, I need to tell my reviewers that there's a serious issue that makes their current review efforts moot. Sometimes it's a large change in the source repository, and I'd like to merge (and possibly redesign) before continuing. Sometimes it's due to someone's comment that send

Feature Request for rbt diff to support "--no-renames" argument for GIT repos

Hi, Could we add a new argument "--no-renames" to "rbt diff" for GIT repos? "rbt diff" is running "git diff" at the backend. "git diff" supports "--no-renames" option to generate DIFF file to avoid incorrect rename action. But "rbt diff" doesn't take this argument right now. Attach the ticket n

Re: Feature request - Hide inactive members when creating member groups

Hi Terry, We have a new user selector coming that will be hiding inactive users and helping with scalability issues for servers with thousands of users. Coming soon to a release near you :) Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Bo

Feature request - Hide inactive members when creating member groups

Our Review Board instance (2.5.6.1) has a number of inactive users. It would be nice to hide those users when adding members to Member Groups. The Users management feature has the ability to show all, active, or inactive users. Something like that for Member Groups would be great. I see that th

Feature request

Hi, would it be possible when showing the diffs between two files, to show any changes in encoding information, like for example, if one version didn't have an UTF-8 BOM mark and the new one does. You would argue that the encoding is may not be important, but it actually can have some side effec

Re: ReviewBoard UI Feature Request

Thanks Christian, let me know if I can assist in any way! On Friday, April 5, 2013 1:57:41 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Jacob, > > These are all great ideas. The first and last are ones I've given some > thought to, but haven't been in a position to work on yet. > > We're working on

Re: ReviewBoard UI Feature Request

Hi Jacob, These are all great ideas. The first and last are ones I've given some thought to, but haven't been in a position to work on yet. We're working on modernizing our JavaScript codebase and doing some prep work for 1.8, but sometime in there I'm hoping to do a revamp of the diff viewer.

ReviewBoard UI Feature Request

Hi Christian, Not sure if this is available or not, however I was wondering if the following would be hard to add to the base RB code: - Ability to place a maker (Last point of review) in on a file in a review request. We review large change sets and many times, we are multitasking and

Feature request: Decline a review request

I would like to suggest a new feature for RB: the ability to ignore a review request. The problem: --- I've found that more often than not, my review requests will simply be ignored by some of the reviewers. The reason may vary (too busy, not familiar with the code base, plain lazy

Re: Feature Request for Reviewboard

I am not very well versed with SQL queries and MySQL. Can you forward me some of the queries you use to get the statistics and how to run them. Just some basic hand holding to get me up to speed? On May 6, 6:28 pm, Leonel Togniolli wrote: > In the mean time, you can just log in the mysql db and

Re: Feature Request for Reviewboard

In the mean time, you can just log in the mysql db and query for the info. The schema is fairly straightforward.That's what I did when I needed similar info recently. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Ashith wrote: > We are planning to track the review requests and the reviewers > statistics in rev

Feature Request for Reviewboard

We are planning to track the review requests and the reviewers statistics in reviewboard. Right now the statistics is only for the reviews and review requests. It would be helpful if the statistics provided the following data, 1. No of review requests logged by each user till date (can be broken d

Re: Feature Request: Include changed files with review

le bit of processing time, but it shouldn't be too bad, really. > > 2) Implement more general file attachment support. > > There's a long-standing feature request for attaching arbitrary files. > See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=239 > > Uploading

Re: Feature Request: Include changed files with review

't be too bad, really. 2) Implement more general file attachment support. There's a long-standing feature request for attaching arbitrary files. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=239 Uploading file attachments is something we want to have in, but just haven't

Feature Request: Include changed files with review

nything Review Board can do about this: some changes are too complicated) and the diff might not show adequate info (now THIS is something I think we _can_ do something about.) So I'd like to propose a feature Request: I'd like to be able to "attach" a .zip to a review request

Re: Small UI feature request: 2 new fields

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 19:53, Christian Hammond wrote: > However, after 1.0, we're putting in > support for extensions, and it should be possible at that time to add custom > fields. It's a little ways down the line, as we need to finish 1.0 first, > but that's getting much closer now. Great,

Re: Small UI feature request: 2 new fields

I missed this e-mail entirely. Sorry about that. We have no plans to add additional fields to Review Board. Custom fields are often very dependent on the company that wants them, and it's not easy to just add them directly in the codebase. However, after 1.0, we're putting in support for extension

Re: Small UI feature request: 2 new fields

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 16:57, Sebastien Douche wrote: > 1. field "dependency" > 2. field "state" No success for my proposal ;(. Now I need 4 new fields, how adding them? -- Sebastien Douche --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subsc

Re: Feature request

Is this something you'd be able to contribute to the project, make available to other people? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:29 PM, TP wrote: > > I have a Perforce c

Re: Feature request

I have a Perforce commit trigger to update the status to submit as well as updating the pending changelist number with the actual submitting changelist. On Mar 2, 1:57 pm, plumpy wrote: > There is a post-commit hook for subversion that will automatically > close reviews. That's not at all what y

Re: Feature request

There is a post-commit hook for subversion that will automatically close reviews. That's not at all what you asked for, but maybe it will help. It's at contrib/tools/post-commit. On Mar 2, 1:22 pm, David Trowbridge wrote: > We've been toying around with how best to do this for a while. Can you >

Re: Feature request

We've been toying around with how best to do this for a while. Can you add your suggestions to http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=294 ? This will help us keep track of them better. Thanks! -David On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Isaac Wagner wrote: > My users have a real hard

Feature request

My users have a real hard time going back to close a review once they have submitted the code. Instead of my periodically auditing the open reviews it would be nice to have reminder emails sent out at a configurable period. Or, even just a button that I could click on to send reminder emails to an

Small UI feature request: 2 new fields

Hi there, We use intensively reviewboard, but we have 2 use caes where RB isn't efficient: 1. A request based on another request (revision is unknown on repository) 2. A request in progress (patch regularly updated) I know it's not easy to develop, thus I propose small improvement: add new field