Re: [Rosegarden-devel] status of the guitar code ?

2006-07-29 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 29 July 2006 2:19 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: That's Michelle, right ? I wish she had replied to my request to provide a patch using standard tools :-). Me too. -- D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] MIDI Thru policy (was Re: my TODO list)

2006-07-30 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 30 July 2006 11:50 am, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: And at the end... Wouldn't be easier to optionally disable the internal MIDI Thru function on Rosegarden, and use qjackctl and its ALSA MIDI connections window to wire the events routing? I just want to state for the record that I

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Pitchtracker release

2006-08-02 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 5:04 am, Erik Magnus Johansson wrote: EMJ: Well, they actually make ethanol of it which then ends up as fuel in my car. Quite good, and my prefered way of consuming alcohol. That Pavillion Rouge E85 tastes a bit of oak, with nutty overtones, but the petroleum

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] instrument presets...

2006-08-02 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 3:29 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Just tried it out -- very nice! What a great little dialog. Why thank you! Of course I can now visualise all sorts of enhancements (e.g. a pitch range preview illustration on the dialog), but I should probably shut up about those

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prospective code file reorganisation

2006-08-02 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 11:01 am, Chris Cannam wrote: Any comments on this one? For a while I've been sitting on a script that reshuffles the code in the gui/ directory of a Rosegarden tree into a set of subdirectories, each with a potentially large set of source files that in most cases

[Rosegarden-devel] tempo changes

2006-08-02 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 5:26 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Finish up the first basic feature in the new-style tempo ruler -- you can now click-drag to increase or decrease a given tempo change The dragging thing is very nice! I don't remember what you have planned, or what's in scope

[Rosegarden-devel] What to do for key at transpose -33

2006-08-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
I asked this question in a comment in a bug report, and nobody caught it. Here's a typical example: Key == C major Transpose == -2 Notation wants to be written at D major to sound correctly. It goes up by two accidentals. From zero accidentals to two accidentals. Now how do you handle that

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] What to do for key at transpose -33

2006-08-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 04 August 2006 11:26 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I asked this question in a comment in a bug report, and nobody caught it. Thanks to Vlada's thinking help off-list, I think I've got it now. sounding transpose is -33 written transpose is +33 Take the remainder of dividing by 12

[Rosegarden-devel] fix for transposing issue #1520716

2006-08-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
After some considerable pain, I finally solved this one. I was getting all screwed up in my head trying to think about the math for this. As Magnus pointed out, I was thinking in fifths, not semitones. I got into a brain damage spiral because for trumpet parts in -2, the two scales happen to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] my TODO list

2006-08-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 06 August 2006 7:21 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: Of course, there may be many bugs. Please test. I'll try. At the least, I can verify you haven't broken anything as pertains to regular dumb kids. -- D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux fanatic,

[Rosegarden-devel] up, get up

2006-08-12 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
Up, get up, ya ragged arse bunch o' tinker cow thieves! (Bonus points if you name that movie!) I have just cleared off my priority 9 bug list. Touch me. Come on. You know you want to @[EMAIL PROTECTED] touch me! So you guys need to get cracking on whacking your own bugs, and/or find me

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] up, get up

2006-08-12 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 12 August 2006 9:55 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: So you guys need to get cracking on whacking your own bugs, and/or find me some new bugs in my stuff to humble me, and put me in my rightful place of shame and embarrassment, because I feel pretty damn hot hot hot right now

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] up, get up

2006-08-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 13 August 2006 4:37 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Google (nul points) tells me it's Rob Roy. I'm quite glad I searched for it, 'cos I haven't actually seen the film, so I'd never have guessed. It's a good one. Most excellent. One of my favorite movie quotes too. I do that. I guess

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7460] trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp

2006-08-15 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 1:03 pm, you wrote: * rearrange parameter boxes from track/segment/instrument to segment/instrument/ track -- let's see what people say I say boo. It's actually segment/track/instrument here. This strikes me as wrong, because I'm staring at an empty composition

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7460] trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp

2006-08-15 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:29 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: I don't find them comfortable, I don't use them, and I probably never will - although I do kind of like them in theory, and would understand if others did in practice. I'd probably never use them either if it weren't necessary to do so

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7460] trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp

2006-08-15 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 5:54 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: I don't disagree with this arrangement for the vertical stacked layout of the parameter area (it's not very relevant which parameter box is at the top in this case) but the new default is the tabbed arrangement, and in this case

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7460] trunk/rosegarden/gui/rosegardengui.cpp

2006-08-15 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 7:31 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: I'm not proposing to change the order of the panels. I'm not proposing that, either. I'm talking about which part of the track parameter box should be hidden to save space in the vertical stacked mode. Do you prefer to hide

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] maybe what we need...

2006-08-16 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 5:30 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: I've looked at the pics, but I can't quite see from them what the proposition is. You can select which things appear in the stack using a right-button menu? What else? How would something like this work in our situation? I don't

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] jv80.rgd and IPB

2006-08-17 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Thursday 17 August 2006 12:00 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: changes from one bank to another. Even if you disable the program check before changing banks, the index of the program combo should be invalidated as the program combo is repopulated (selecting the none entry). Well, the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Michelle's guitar patch ?

2006-08-19 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 19 August 2006 8:07 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: Has anybody still got her funnily-packaged patch ? I might have some time to convert it to a more proper format. Nope, apparently not. I didn't bother downloading it, because I knew I'd never be bothered to go through the hoops to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] jv80.rgd and IPB

2006-08-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 20 August 2006 6:39 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: After a more detailed inspection, there was nothing wrong in the Studio area, or in the jv80.rgd device definition. The problem is in the IPB, class MIDIInstrumentParameterPanel, and my changes only rendered the problem even

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Updated handbook

2006-08-21 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 21 August 2006 8:27 am, Chris Cannam wrote: Ah, I didn't see that. I do think your English is perfectly good enough for the handbook, though if Michael's happy to do the polishing and integration that's fine with me. I am in this one instance, but I generally think we do need to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] chord position generation status

2006-08-21 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 21 August 2006 11:34 am, Stephen Torri wrote: Once I understand how she generated the chords I will make my version of her program work as the binary she sent me. Hah. shakes cane at you In my day sonny boy, we didn't need no stinking source code. We just disassembled it and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] off until friday

2006-08-22 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 8:13 am, Chris Cannam wrote: On Tuesday 22 Aug 2006 13:09, Guillaume Laurent wrote: I'm away for a few days of vacations until friday. ... and I'm going to be away for a week from tomorrow ... ... and I have had what I think is a really fantastic run, but I've just

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] off until friday

2006-08-22 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 11:05 am, Chris Cannam wrote: ... and I have had what I think is a really fantastic run, but I've just flat run out of steam. Maybe it's time to declare a string freeze in the GUI? I don't _think_ I'm going to need any new strings before the release. Not that

[Rosegarden-devel] traducción al español

2006-08-22 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
I'm having a whack at this. You don't really want to do translations anymore, Pedro, and Marcos is all tied up with Musix. I thought there was less to do than there actually is, and I went ahead and got started working on the update. Ugh. This is why I'm a truck driver, not a translator,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] got unsubscribed from rg-bugs

2006-08-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 26 August 2006 7:12 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: Just got this, much to my amazement. I was wondering if I was the only one. Given that I've also been missing messages from the rg-devel list from time to time for a while now, I'm beginning to seriously worry about my hoster's mail

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] FW: Help needed compiling rosegarden 1.2.4

2006-08-29 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 28 August 2006 10:08 pm, Darcy Kahle wrote: On Friday, August 25th, 2006, I sent this email to the Rosegarden user list. I have not yet received a response, and I think that the devel list might be more applicable. Could someone please let me know what I can do to fix this problem?

[Rosegarden-devel] having fun...

2006-09-01 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
This is fun. It turned dreary and cool and rainy for several days, and I ran out of ways to amuse myself short of actually doing something really constructive, like sifting through the ever-present stack of books and miscellaneous detritus that is always cluttering up my desk. I decided to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-02 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 02 September 2006 7:18 pm, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: How should one organize these into the menus? Would the following be ok: Probably OK. Putting stuff where on what menu is more or less my job, so if this looks wrong when I see it, I'll put it somewhere else. You shouldn't

[Rosegarden-devel] double delete arming record

2006-09-03 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
I've run into this twice now, and I still haven't gotten a good stack trace. There's something really nasty lurking in here somewhere. The GUI goes down, and the sequencer continues the play operation. Recording too? Yes. Recording too. Size of my audio directory over a few moments:

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-03 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 03 September 2006 5:42 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: IMHO, localizations should not pend releasing. Better idea would be to provide a proper rosegarden.pot file for the stable release I'm not quite sure what you mean. I think I do. We can fool with the strings up until the release

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-03 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 03 September 2006 7:21 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: We especially need to make a decision on the parameter widgets. You and I agree that the tabs are evil, but we're about going to have to do this Pedro's way with bits of this and that missing from the stacked view, and tabs

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] TRANSLATORS: release coming up soon!

2006-09-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 04 September 2006 12:50 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Lang Total DoneFuzzy Pending - - --- es 21071796225 86 What the hell?! I thought I had it 100% complete. -- D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] translations and releases, was Re: Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 04 September 2006 12:44 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Ah, so the suggestion is that we don't bother to get the translations up to date at all for the feature release, but then rely on having a stable release series (which we don't currently have) and bringing the translations up to date

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] TRANSLATORS: release coming up soon!

2006-09-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
Translation status report for Rosegarden project rosegarden.pot has 2107 messages Lang Total DoneFuzzy Pending - - --- ca 21071905130 72 cs 21071905118 84 cy 21071072654 381 de 21071194

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] translations and releases, was Re: Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
itself 1.3pre1, then this is probably already settled. Plus all this skipping of versions is probably going to make people think we're nuts. We already caused something of a stir going from 1.0 to 1.2. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] translations and releases, was Re: Invert, Retrograde Retrograde Invert

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
of it. I'm fairly ambivalent about the whole thing. Especially just at the moment. Starting my vacation today, and I have a fever. Fan-frickin-tastic. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 08 September 2006 3:35 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Also seeking contributions for the what's new in 1.3 release note. I'm combing through the log to find where new-to-1.3 stuff starts, and will produce something directly. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek

[Rosegarden-devel] general note about SVN comments

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
to the end of this file and go through the whole process before making final recommendations about how we should do SVN commit log entries. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
fixes this fix kind of nonsense distilled down to the underlying thing that eventually happened. It may fall short of its target. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
configure options. If we can't make them print, and thus make this whole thing at least partially of some use to someone, then I have to go with d) for now. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
that, actually. But at least to .5 -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Using Tomcat

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] category/instruments names etc.

2006-09-12 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] category/instruments names etc.

2006-09-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
rosegarden.pot Report produced at Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:56:30 -0400 -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] category/instruments names etc.

2006-09-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
managed to do so. Sigh. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Using Tomcat but need to do more

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Experiences with Rosegarden-1.3pre1

2006-09-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. The real question is why is this happening though. I don't know, off hand. I'm hoping someone better at debugging without blind guesswork will pipe up with some suggestions. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] TRANSLATORS: release coming up soon!

2006-09-16 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
), or to zoom in and out (by holding the Control key)./p\n Where is that, the tips file? Did you not realize we have to translate the bloody tips file too? -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] autoscrolling hell

2006-09-16 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
earlier today, autoscrolling while drawing out a long selection in notation doesn't seem to happen. Requires wiggling the mouse back and forth to keep things moving. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] High Resolution Timer Error

2006-09-18 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
config: # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set # CONFIG_HZ_250_NODEFAULT is not set CONFIG_HZ_1000=y CONFIG_HZ=1000 If yours is the same, then I guess the next is the usual dumb question about you're sure you're actually running the kernel you compiled with this config, right? -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] rc1

2006-09-19 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
the release. (I vote to go ahead, and come up with such a plan, rather than holding back for translations.) -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ glitch.png Description: PNG

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden 1.4.0 released

2006-09-19 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 5:13 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: ROSEGARDEN 1.4.0 RELEASED Cheers! sounds of beer bottle opening This means you're free to commit your new revert, etc. feature, Heikki, and we can commence working out where to stick it in the menus. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden 1.4.0 released

2006-09-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
to that bug you reported about slowness too. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Take Surveys. Earn

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Starting 1.5.x development release series? Was: ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden 1.4.0 released

2006-09-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
). I'll weigh in on this tomorrow evening. I just haven't had time for email today. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

[Rosegarden-devel] Tied notes and the matrix oh my...

2006-09-22 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
if Chris could find time to chime in. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Take Surveys. Earn

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Tied notes and the matrix oh my...

2006-09-22 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
rosegarden split, then go through each note again, extending it to the right duration. This takes a lot of time. Sounds like this would be covered by the above already, for your purposes. Would you still need it otherwise? -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prospective code file reorganisation

2006-09-23 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
, but worth doing, so let's roll up our sleeves and get this the hell over with as soon as possible. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prospective code file reorganisation

2006-09-23 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
still exist. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] autoscrolling hell

2006-09-23 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
optimistic that I'm about to be suitably impressed. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ - Take

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] autoscrolling hell

2006-09-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
it mostly William's work? Anyway, I'll go with Martin on this one, and we should just vet the patch already. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

[Rosegarden-devel] another fruitless test post

2006-10-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
Apparently nothing I sent out since 9-24 actually made it to SF. Something changed overnight, and it wasn't on my end. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

[Rosegarden-devel] test #42

2006-10-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
This one should work. Or I will commence screaming directly. (Thanks, Chris.) -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

[Rosegarden-devel] another futile test

2006-10-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
I hate whoever broke whatever they broke. They suck. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Wishes/suggestions mostly for notation (long)

2006-10-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
rests. Even at that, I still haven't worked out a way to do something like a quarter note with two stems, one up, one down. It's not really what I'd call useless, but limited, quirky, and a real bother, I'd say so. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Starting 1.5.x development release series? Was: ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden 1.4.0 released

2006-10-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 6:55 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I'll weigh in on this tomorrow evening. I just haven't had time for email today. I got sidetracked by lots of ugly real life things. Um. I can't remember the whole conversation now, or what I was going to say. I agreed

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
setting that up. It seems scons was abandoned by KDE, and not very many people are using scons, and a lot of people are bitching about the few apps that do use it. We sure as hell don't want to go back to autohell. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:57 am, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Here it is. This is about double the old tree. Not as bad as I was thinking though. real13m19.087s user11m18.548s sys 0m46.968s Sequencer does not start with this old problem: rosegarden (sequence manager

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
in one terminal; ./rosegarden --existingsequencer --ignoreversion in another. Alrighty then. Here's your I'm with stupid --- T-shirt. It's running. I'll see what I can break after I eat lunch. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
be easier to convert from autotools to cmake, and we're going to have to do something entirely from scratch, which I haven't found any good documentation for yet. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 04 November 2006 4:05 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: we're going to have to do something entirely from scratch, which I haven't found any good documentation for yet. OK, I have now, but this looks like way more than I'm good for. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-04 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
daughter. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] reorganisation branch now builds

2006-11-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
were about to say something like that. Outstanding! -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] CMake for Rosegarden (reorganisation branch)

2006-11-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. Nice to have you back from whatever rock you've been hiding under. :D -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] collaboration offer from kguitar/ktabedit

2006-11-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
guy actually means to do something more than talk about what he's going to do, then let him have at it, I say. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] CMake for Rosegarden (reorganisation branch)

2006-11-07 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
completely opaque and indeciperable. Hell, I guess based on this requirement, my vote would be to build the fucker with a bash script. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] our code is full of empty :-)

2006-11-10 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule) = 18.90 Total Estimated Cost to Develop = $ 5,648,834 It doesn't come out much different running on the old branch. Interesting utility. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] cmake testing

2006-11-14 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. This is a deal breaker, apparently. Gonna try a clean tree, in case I have some cruft problem. I didn't see any conflicts though. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] cmake testing

2006-11-14 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 12:54 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Gonna try a clean tree, in case I have some cruft problem. I didn't see any conflicts though. Nope. Same problem. cmake version 2.4-patch 3 The changing the prefix thing is really unintuitive and a pain in the ass too

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] cmake testing

2006-11-14 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
previous comments. Interesting. I'm going to rebuild cmake for good measure. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] cmake testing

2006-11-14 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 2:27 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: On Tuesday, 14 November 2006 18:54, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Looking at ccmake myself, I get some error about unknown something KDE_DCOP_BLAH. Can you please copy-and-paste the screen output, or give a more detailed

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] cmake testing

2006-11-14 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. ccmake . works. Yes, soy un hijo de puta cabrón pendejo maricón. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] CMake-based buildsystem in reorganisation branch

2006-11-18 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
that transpose thing. That was quick. I was just looking for a nudge in the right direction, mind. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] CMake-based buildsystem in reorganisation branch

2006-11-19 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
glaurent http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables In both cases all files are reported to indicate CMake knows they are up to date in the installed location. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] shall we merge the reorg branch ?

2006-11-24 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
: TRUE Custom OSC plugin GUI support : TRUE LRDF plugin metadata support : TRUE -- Configuring done That build worked. Haven't run it yet. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] shall we merge the reorg branch ?

2006-11-25 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. I should go read the stuff you've spent so long putting together, and see for myself just why LIRC doesn't fit the usual model. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] shall we merge the reorg branch ?

2006-11-25 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 25 November 2006 10:26 am, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: Not that I'm bitching about a free build system. I should go read the stuff you've spent so long putting together, and see for myself just why LIRC doesn't fit the usual model. Because sound stuff doesn't fit the usual model

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] shall we merge the reorg branch ?

2006-11-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:37 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: I'm at a computer now -- I'll do it in a moment. Just for the merry hell of it, I'm going to find out what happens when I do an update in my old rosegarden/ directory that used to be trunk/ -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on precompiled headers

2006-11-28 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
other consideration out, you sold me with the purty colrrrs! I love colors. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Testing

2006-12-01 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
to rebuild it and start over, and then it's been compiling Rosegarden just fine. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan

[Rosegarden-devel] ubuntu release schedule

2006-12-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
, and especially keen to avoid *that* happening. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ - Take Surveys

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG build broken (Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7722] trunk/rosegarden)

2006-12-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 2:49 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: And I can't get it to link either, having installed fftw3f and called 'cmake .' ... I was just about to report the same. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG build broken (Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7722] trunk/rosegarden)

2006-12-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
: ${FFTW3F_INC_DIR}) ENDIF(FFTW3F_FOUND) -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG build broken (Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7722] trunk/rosegarden)

2006-12-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
such pansies about trying to be everything to everybody. I think we need to apply that more broadly in other ways too. Fewer options, fewer configurable behaviors. Avoid adding more of this, and perhaps we should well get rid of some of what we currently have. That's my vote. -- D. Michael

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] RG build broken (Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7722] trunk/rosegarden)

2006-12-06 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 7:12 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: It does. Seems that no build system is free of this kind of problems :-). Except LEGO Mindstorms. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] (no subject)

2006-12-11 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] some things to test

2006-12-12 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
too, and no change. Another thing there, we really MUST do something about documenting the growing number of helper apps without which many of our newest features are useless. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music

[Rosegarden-devel] releasing

2006-12-12 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
tree and new build system, everything else aside. Though we should delay long enough to at least attempt to address the aforementioned problems that shipped with 1.4.0. I might get time to look into that tonight. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] some things to test

2006-12-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 9:50 am, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: it works when you know how to work it. And it's rather nice, quibble aside, I hasten to add. Did we really not have a velocity changer combo before? It seems so natural that it should be there. (I know we didn't. I looked

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >