Re: [Rosegarden-user] Ancient Rosegarden Version Files

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, at 14:59, Bobbus Mustelidus via Rosegarden-user wrote: > From a recovered hard drive, I have a number of very old (circa 2000) > text files that are apparently saved Rosegarden sessions. They look > something like... > > #!Rosegarden > # > # Musical Notation File > # > > R

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Focusrite Solo?

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, at 16:33, Mike Witt wrote: > Just curious if anyone here is using a Focusrite Solo, and what your > experience has been. I have one - it's been unproblematic, seems pretty good. I use it with an XLR mic and headphones. Chris ___

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden App Icon

I rather liked the geometrical ones (6, 7, 8) that everyone else seems so averse to! I do agree that 1 is quite likeable though. I didn't go for 2, 3, 4, or 9 for one reason or another. Chris ___ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.s

Re: [Rosegarden-user] New Rosegarden Logo

On Sat, 16 Mar 2019, at 06:49, david wrote: > Where's the original rose photo? Might be fun to see about SVGing it myself. See https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/mailman/message/36401431/ (there is an attachment link). Nobody should listen to me, but I will say that I'm totally fine with cha

Re: [Rosegarden-user] No more 64Studio distro

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, at 17:56, Ted Felix wrote: >I think at least part of that page is computer-generated. Chris > would know more. Not sure exactly what is safe to change and what isn't > on that page. I updated the page. It's generally fine to change anything in there, so long as the

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Is there a new release coming ahead?

On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, at 19:41, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 04/07/2017 10:51 AM, Ted Felix wrote: > > >Lemme know if you want me to do it. > > It seems like a fitting moment to acknowledge that I finally burned out. Ow. > The website is in SVN somewhere, and Chris has a script to publi

Re: [Rosegarden-user] (no subject)

On Mon, May 19, 2014, at 05:12 PM, Abrolag wrote: > > I never knew that! It's interesting that nobody, including other RG developers, seems to have known (or remembered?) about this feature. I only dimly remembered it myself. Yet it's been there for over 7 years, since the KDE3 version, and is

Re: [Rosegarden-user] (no subject)

(sorry about the empty mail just now -- it's early) On Sun, May 18, 2014, at 06:47 AM, shelagh.man...@gmail.com wrote: > Rubberband is also meant to be able to do this. > > You can find a ladspa plugin as well as a cli version for it, which > means, > I guess as I've never played with it myself,

Re: [Rosegarden-user] (no subject)

th > this > stuff in Rosegarden. > > I found a copy in the unbuntu repositories. But the web site is > http://www.breakfastquay.com/rubberband/ > > Doesn't Chris Cannam have something to do with this? If so, maybe > Rosegarden could interact with rubberband in more sophist

Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Update on tuplet rewrite

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 10:05 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 11/15/2013 04:40 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: > > > released, most probably, but if it *just* gets merged and released > > without really being exercised, it won't work. > > I agree, though it's a pr

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Warning maessage "resolution timer" with rt kernel and hrtimer mod.

On 3 October 2012 20:20, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 10/03/2012 03:15 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: > >> Rosegarden is about the only major application that ever used the ALSA >> sequencer timers. Others do their own timing, and consequently have >> different problems. >

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Warning maessage "resolution timer" with rt kernel and hrtimer mod.

On 3 October 2012 11:29, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > I know Chris Cannam was completely convinced that the new 250 Hz > timer resolution couldn't possibly reproduce MIDI correctly, and that > concern was backed up by sound reasoning and actual math skills. Be > that as it ma

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 30 August 2012 13:27, Richard Bown wrote: > Ok, this is your fault. > > http://masticate.com/2012/08/30/ode-to-a-preemptive-multitasking-kernel/ http://thebreakfastpost.com/2012/08/31/a-batch-processing-system-replies/ Chris --

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 30 August 2012 18:47, jimmy wrote: > But the ignorant people always think because they pay for something they must > have something worth-while, especially the more expensive stuff. But hey, > its their money. There's one born every minute. Nope, that's not right. There are perfectly sound

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 30 August 2012 13:27, Richard Bown wrote: > Ok, this is your fault. Glad of it -- it's good! Other than that it seems to be about computers. Chris -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 29 August 2012 23:26, Richard Bown wrote: > It's a fucking operating system. Get over it. There's just no poetry in you. Chris -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today'

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 29 August 2012 14:48, Richard Bown wrote: > On 29 Aug 2012, at 15:36, John wrote: > [...] >> I have reached the point in life where I become immune to the accusation of >> being to lazy to learn how to make programs to work. I rather prefer to >> spend my time to smell the roses. > > Well s

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 27 August 2012 18:02, S. Christian Collins wrote: > Sorry to hear your upgrade didn't go well, Michael. I've had a few things > break over the years during upgrades, but nothing so completely trashed as > what it seems you experienced. I'm currently using the latest Kubuntu > 12.04, and I hav

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 27 August 2012 16:04, Chris Cannam wrote: > I think XFCE is a fair option for people who were happy with the > previous generation of desktops and are quite content to watch history > pass them by. Of course, this is a problem if those people are developers, since they end up no

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Audio segments not showing their contents (waveform)

On 27 August 2012 16:08, Holger Marzen wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Abrolag wrote: >> >> > The first is that an audio segment doesn't show any contents for several >> > bars although it plays correctly. With some of my shorter segments t

Re: [Rosegarden-user] The future of Linux sure looks bleak...

On 27 August 2012 15:57, Holger Marzen wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Noel Darlow wrote: > >> Long time XFCE user here. I can't remember ever having a problem. > > XFCE4 ist *my* successor of KDE3. Mine too (though in the interim I switched from KDE3 to GNOME 2). I think XFCE is a fair option for

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Busted Examples

On 18 May 2012 01:06, steve conrad wrote: > Was that meant to be snide? Haha -- as in, "if your examples don't work, just delete them! and you're done" I read Michael's reply as meaning that he'd already found and fixed this in the example pieces in the source tree, but that the examples quick-l

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD

On 17 May 2012 09:10, Gary G. wrote: > How do you attach anything to this Listserv?  Actually is it a Listserv or > an NNTP server? It's a mailing list, i.e. like a listserv though not actually running listserv software. http://rosegardenmusic.com/support/lists/ Gmane provides a web interface a

Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Fwd: Rosegarden's Future

On 13 May 2012 23:56, Cláudio Pinheiro wrote: > Rosegarden needs broad visibility by potential users, so it can generate a > critical mass that would attract developers that would maintain a sustained > growth and (even) better codebase and documentation. To achieve it > Rosegarden must walk the m

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown wrote: > Devs or Interested in Ports I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to help out if there was more general interest. (Why not particularly interested? I just don'

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

[cc -devel] On 10 May 2012 13:41, Ian Gardner wrote: > I guess people like me are part of the problem in this regard, turn up one > day, chuck something in to do with linked segments and then f. off into the > sunset. Fly-by-night, here today and gone tomorrow contributors :-( Well, you could

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

On 10 May 2012 12:38, Richard Bown wrote: > On one point - who hosts the RG website currently and any chance making this > editable with some non stone-age tools and for multiple users? I host it. It gets updated automatically from the Subversion repo. (https://rosegarden.svn.sourceforge.net/svn

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

On 8 May 2012 08:23, Richard Bown wrote: >> I have failed. > > What absolute self indulgent rubbish. Though a very nicely constructed extended metaphor. I think you're sort-of right that the proper answer ought to be a nice brisk one about how it's just going the way it has to go and if it isn't

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

On 8 May 2012 18:57, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Tuesday, May 08, 2012, PMA wrote: > >> Waay too hard on yourself. >> You need a (free) weekend in Acapulco! > > There is real truth in that. Hang on, did I miss something? Is someone offering a free weekend in Acapulco? Chris ---

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden's Future

On 8 May 2012 17:18, David Tisdell wrote: > The attempt at a Mac port was done before the codebase had been moved to qt. > It was installed through fink. I exchanged email with the person who had > tried it and he had run into significant  problems because of KDE > dependencies and he gave up. I

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Long term bugs

On 26 April 2012 10:58, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Abrolag wrote: > >> The first is that an audio segment doesn't show any contents for several >> bars although it plays correctly. With some of my shorter segments this >> means I don't get to see anything at all. >

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden doesnt start

On 23 November 2011 20:45, wrote: > When executing gdb /usr/bin/rosegarden there isn't anithing utile: > GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.2 p1) 7.2 > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > This is free software: you are

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Ramped tempo changes aren't ramped when exported as MIDI?

On 22 October 2011 18:51, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > When I think about it, I'm surprised more people haven't run into this.  Tempo > ramps were never fully implemented from the beginning, years ago now, and > nobody ever came back to finish the job.  If my memory is correct, the MIDI > export s

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Choose Text Encoding

On 19 October 2011 22:48, Johan Vromans wrote: > Yes. That's the surprising part. Apparently Rosegarder *does* have a > clue. (Unless it always presents UTF-8 as default choice.) No, I think it tries to guess from the content. The problem is that the guess isn't terribly reliable; it goes for UT

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Choose Text Encoding

On 19 October 2011 18:42, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Wednesday, October 19, 2011, Johan Vromans wrote: > >> Is there a way I can instruct RoseGarden to *always* use UTF-8 and not >> bother me with encoding selection? > > Rosegarden has to ask, because there's nothing in the standard that can

Re: [Rosegarden-user] problems with compiling

On 18 Sep 2011 00:55, "shelagh.man...@gmail.com" wrote: > > I checked out the latest svn updates and did a make distclean autoconf and then configure. I think you need an "aclocal -I ." before the autoconf, or else to run the bootstrap script? Chris --

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Crashes when resizing audio segment

On 28 June 2011 04:03, Peter Desjardins wrote: > AudioPreviewThread::requestPreview for file id 1, start -0.064062500R, > end  8.08125R, width 1018, notify 0x1d8cc60 > AudioPreviewThread::requestPreview - token = 4 > AudioPreviewThread::process() > AudioPreviewThread::process() file id 1 > ter

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Crashes when resizing audio segment

On 24 June 2011 06:04, Peter Desjardins wrote: > Hi. I'm new to Rosegarden. I've been trying to compose with audio > segments and Rosegarden has crashed every time I hold down shift while > resizing a segment. I had a quick try and couldn't reproduce this. Can you try running Rosegarden under a

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Keyboard Shortcuts page on the wiki

On 28 April 2011 06:10, Jim Cochrane wrote: > Looks like an excellent start and very helpful!  Thanks for doing this. Indeed, and I like the idea of providing clarifying descriptions of some of these. I should have said this sooner, but it's quite easy to extract the actual shortcuts from our .r

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden crashes other apps and jack when quiting

On 20 April 2011 07:22, bart deruyter wrote: > I find it unbelievable that an app like Rosegarden has no setting to enable > itself, or disable itself as master in the Jack session setup I don't think I understand this -- what do you mean by "master in the Jack session setup"? > and I hardly > c

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Problems with printing

On 10 Apr 2011 21:39, "D. Michael McIntyre" < michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com> wrote: > What about quantizing though? I never could use any combination of quantizers > to get that original performance lined up mechanically on precise boundaries Oh! I simply didn't try any edits on the piece

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Problems with printing

On 10 April 2011 17:08, A. J. Clark wrote: > I guess my other question relating to the early timings on the events is > - if I did quantization within the notation editor to quarter notes, > should that not have resolved the beginning timing of the events? It should have. The bug is that it didn

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Problems with printing

On 10 April 2011 10:36, Chris Cannam wrote: > On 10 Apr 2011 10:21, "D. Michael McIntyre" > wrote: >> I can't get acceptable results out of Rosegarden, pulling out all the >> tricks at my disposal after all these years. > > Wow, you don't hear that e

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Problems with printing

On 10 Apr 2011 10:21, "D. Michael McIntyre" < michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com> wrote: > I can't get acceptable results out of Rosegarden, pulling out all the tricks > at my disposal after all these years. Wow, you don't hear that every day. I've got to have a look at this one! I think I shoul

[Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden in schools (UK) -- any expertise?

Hello all -- I've had a query about the use of Rosegarden in schools, specifically whether I know of anyone who might be able to demonstrate Rosegarden as a potential tool for use in a secondary school (in south-east England). Once upon a time I'd have been quite keen to do this myself, but I have

Re: [Rosegarden-user] MIDI Start/Stop and controller messages

On 2 March 2011 23:08, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Wednesday, March 02, 2011, Don Garb wrote: > >> MIDI Start (Transport) and MIDI Stop (Transport). > > I have no idea if we support these or not Sounds like MMC, no? We're supposed to support that (both master and slave) but they're switched

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Question on best soundcards for MIDI work

On 1 March 2011 20:49, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Monday, February 28, 2011, Darcy Kahle wrote: > >> I currently have a SoundBlaster Live! that has the embedded hardware MIDI >> Synth...  I would like to get another soundcard with an embedded hardware >> MIDI Synth for the new system.  I have

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Call for alpha testers: FLAM

On 28 February 2011 01:19, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Sunday, February 27, 2011, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > >> Where I'm expecting this to lead, eventually, is that there will be much >> better external GUIs available for these plugins by way of FLAM... > > By way of example, here's my firs

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Real-time Linux needed?

On 24 Feb 2011 17:29, "D. Michael McIntyre" < michael.mcint...@rosegardenmusic.com> wrote: > > What it means is that your kernel was compiled with a system timer resolution > of 1000 Hz instead of 250 Hz or whatever it is that we prefer. I think 1000Hz is what we prefer, 100 is the (very) old defa