[freenet-support] Running freenet without run.sh or a wrapper

2010-08-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
Until recently, I was able to start freenet directly with a cool "java blablaoptions freenet.node.Nodestarter". Not so with the latest bunch of freenet releases :S. Is there a nice and easy way to get it run simply, without all these wrappers (nonsense :b)? _

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'HI--I am new to computers and by natre ...'

2010-08-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:05:13 +, Freenet Project Inc. wrote: > Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc. > > freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report > > sent a message from > http://freenet.uservoice.com/forums/8861-general > [http://freenet.uservoice.com/forums/8861-ge

[freenet-support] bloom-*.tmp files

2010-08-02 Thread Dennis Nezic
What are the bloom-123123123123.tmp files in my system's /tmp folder, and why aren't they ever deleted? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cg

Re: [freenet-support] Build 1263 problem? or power outage?

2010-07-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:51:40 -0700, Ray Jones wrote: > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:34 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > O > > > I can reload the Browse page or the Configuration pages, > > > but /downloads and /uploads will not load. > > > > Interesting.

Re: [freenet-support] Build 1263 problem? or power outage?

2010-07-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:02:48 -0700, Ray Jones wrote: > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 02:41 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > What do you mean mean the uploads/downloads page "will not load"? > > (Ie. does it not show the queued files, but rather something like > > '

Re: [freenet-support] Build 1263 problem? or power outage?

2010-07-30 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:25:04 -0700, Ray Jones wrote: > > I am having a problem with my uploads/downloads queue with 1263 (yes, > there was also a power outage - perhaps that is the problem) > > FProxy will not load the Uploads or Downloads page. It just keeps > running constantly. Over in Frost,

Re: [freenet-support] Java cpu usage running amok, FMS crashed node

2010-07-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:05:48 +0200, Jep wrote: > As I'm used to by now, it took multiple efforts to get the new > Freenet version 1259 to connect to strangers; it seems to require a > complete new install from scratch and no less will do. > No way of updating works for me, FN has been whirling all

Re: [freenet-support] Java cpu usage running amok

2010-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
n(Sha1Test.java:52) > >> Caused by: java.io.IOException: DerValue.getBigInteger, not an int > >> 48 at sun.security.util.DerValue.getBigInteger(Unknown Source) > >> at sun.security.x509.SerialNumber.construct(Unknown > >> Source) at sun.security.x509.Seria

Re: [freenet-support] Java cpu usage running amok

2010-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
What's the name of that java profiling program that profiles which functions all the cpu work is going into? :P (Also, during the high-cpu periods, how much memory (out of your 512mb) is being used?) On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote: > Got a freenet node running for no less than a f

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'So I had this idea to counteract abuive ...'

2010-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 22:40:09 +, Freenet Project Inc. wrote: > Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc. > > freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report > > 0 anonymous [http://freenet.uservoice.com/users/12587447-anonymous] > sent a message from http://freenetproject.org/ >

Re: [freenet-support] "Internal error" - help

2010-06-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:37:34 +1000, Dave D wrote: > > Hi there, > I have the same problem as described here: > https://freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2949 > > The Download page will not load, spits out a "Internal error Return > to queue page." message. > > Is there a way to rectify the problem

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1250

2010-06-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:30:28 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1250 is now available. It will be mandatory on > the 15th. Changes: > - Fix a bug which resulted in inserted data being cached locally in > the client-cache. It's not supposed to be cached at all on the > inserting nod

[freenet-support] Fw: Inserts insert fine, but FCP never finishes

2010-06-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
episodi...@mtnvoeldfh6zd61fk1br94hikbkstf2xsmvqfts16lc wrote : > episodi...@mtnvoeldfh6zd61fk1br94hikbkstf2xsmvqfts16lc wrote : >> ros...@mrdnrocaisdbhx3oqxnxsr2fhlrafrkk7wsoy9ecxdq wrote : >>> Anybody else getting this? >>> >>> I insert via PutComplexDir using TogosFCP or jSite (0.6). My site >>>

Re: [freenet-support] Unable to start service - please help

2010-06-11 Thread Dennis Nezic
Maybe you can check (the last parts) of your wrapper.log file, in freenet's folder. Maybe post it here or somewhere. On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:40:44 -0700, slsm...@cox.net wrote: > Thank you for the replies. I tried starting manually with the jars > and am still unsuccessful. I changed the > servic

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:54:42 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > >> Is it possible to explicitly state the compress

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with > >> GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don&

Re: [freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or > GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands > are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) > > When

[freenet-support] getchk getchkfile with or without compression

2010-06-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?) When inserting files via fproxy, I think you have to explicitly decide whether to compress

Re: [freenet-support] Uninstall Freenet

2010-05-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
Ubuntu doesn't have a freenet package?? On Mon, 03 May 2010 22:43:51 +0800, Chris wrote: > Gday, > > Could you please help me? I am trying to uninstall Freenet. > > Since installing Freenet, there is activity happening behind the > scenes when the machine is sitting idle even with Freenet shutd

Re: [freenet-support] Just what are recommended system requirements for 0.7x?

2010-05-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 25 May 2010 04:28:29 -0400, starg...@gmx.sg wrote: > I've finally decided to move from 0.5 to 0.7. I don't know if it's > any of the settings or the 0.7's hardware requirements - but the CPU > is about 10 degrees C warmer in average than before, and CPU usage is > very often at 100 %, which

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'Hello!I read in "news" that:The ...'

2010-05-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
We already assume that Google is Big Brother. Though we also shouldn't blindly assume that /any/ of the developers are necessarily any more trustworthy. The only decent solution to this very common problem is the openness of the source code, which includes simplicity in the coding and algorithms. T

Re: [freenet-support] Fwd: NPE and log file size of 50 GiB

2010-03-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:58:47 -0400, test...@codingninjas.org wrote: > I would try this: > > Enable panic button. > Downloading two files so there is at least two files downloading at > once (i think panic button only shows if this is the case). > Click panic button. > Click yes. > > it deletes yo

[freenet-support] Return of the Out of memory, Part LCXIX

2010-03-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
As I (and I'm sure others) mentioned before, my node is still going down (crashing?) regularly -- roughly weekly. I currently allocate it 150MB of (precious) ram. Here are my last 2 (of infinity) heap reports from the jvm dump: Heap def new generation total 46080K, used 41323K eden space 409

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:35:30 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Ian's friend pupok is working on a new AJAXy user interface mockup > for Freenet. Oh god no. Make sure it's easy to disable this garbage for people who still value control over their web pages (to read, parse, etc). Dillo doesn't (and ho

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1240

2010-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:18:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > - New version of Library with many improvements. It will still cause > the node to crash with Out of Memory sometimes on searches for > popular words. Lol. ___ Support mailing list Support@free

Re: [freenet-support] jSite trouble

2010-01-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
Fail. On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:38:43 -0500, Chris Dixon wrote: > unsubscribe > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:48 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden < > bo...@pterodactylus.net> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 January 2010 13:26:51 Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > > > > I'm using jSite to insert an already inserted frees

Re: [freenet-support] trouble installing

2010-01-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:26:02 -0600 (CST), clos...@inbox5.com wrote: > After downloading Freenet I try to install and I get an error message > "Freenet starter was unable to control the freenet system service." > Reason: "Service did not respond to signal." > What do I have to do? Debug. For starte

Re: [freenet-support] I Like the Idea but....

2010-01-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:58:19 -0500, Tim Jones wrote: > I think you need to publish a more user friendly description of the > product and how it works. I am a fairly experienced PC/Windows user > for many years and I made a career of data administration using > technology. However, reading your webs

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: > >> 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: > >> Internal error > >> Internal error > >>

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: > > 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: > Internal error > Internal error > Return to queue page. > [The "queue page" gives this error message too] I have posted about this bug as far back as June 12th '09, with freenet ve

[freenet-support] Out of memory: Emergency shutdowns

2009-12-16 Thread Dennis Nezic
My node pretty regularly goes down once every week from: "Out of memory: Emergency shutdown to protect database integrity in progress" If it can manage to adequately maintain memory for six days, why can't it do it for a few more? Is there nothing it can delete from memory to make room for whatev

Re: [freenet-support] Important question about make webstie on freenet

2009-11-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:58:21 +0100, Gonzalo Castro Carballo wrote: > hello, I'd like to create a website in Freenet. I have a question I > can not resolve. After creating a website, how can I change the index > to update the website?. Do I need to create and upload a new one?. > What happens then w

Re: [freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:44:07 -0500, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Dennis Nezic > wrote: > > What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides > > complicating things.) > > > > When I try to "wget -r -np" a freesite

[freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
What is the purpose of the "freenet:" notation? (Besides complicating things.) When I try to "wget -r -np" a freesite, most links will not be fetched -- namely those that still use the ubiquitous "/USK..." url. (Because -np, --no-parent, is meant to only fetch files within a particular directory a

Re: [freenet-support] JVM Problems

2009-10-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:46:42 -0500, Mason Brake wrote: > > I had the version of Java installed, reinstalled the VERY new one, > and made sure that Firefox ran it as a plug-in. I still can't get in. > What do I need to do? Just a quick note: freenet has nothing really to do with Firefox -- it can

Re: [freenet-support] Out of memory kills node?

2009-10-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:01 -0500, CyberLeo wrote: > About once every 1-2 weeks, my node will shut down completely. > > In the wrapper log, I see: > INFO | jvm 2| 2009/10/20 16:30:59 | Out of memory: Emergency > shutdown to protect database integrity in progress... > > followed by a full t

Re: [freenet-support] Brazilian court bans p2p

2009-10-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:03:13 +0200 (CEST), [Anon] Anon User wrote: > Message-type: plaintext > > how does this precedent affect freenet? > > http://torrentfreak.com/brazilian-court-bans-p2p-software-090918/ Puta que pariu :P. It would spur freenet's growth and popularity -- not to mention the pu

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet uninstall for new Build install

2009-10-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:38:47 +0700, l...@hushmail.com wrote: > On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:04:34 +0700, Evan Daniel wrote: > Please send replies to the support list; it makes it easier for > others > to help with the problem, and for anyone with the same problem to > see > the answer. (Unless, of co

Re: [freenet-support] can’t connect to the server “127.0.0.1”

2009-09-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:01:08 -0700, David Lowe wrote: > I can't communicate with FreeNet anymore. For a while i > couldn't view the interface in a browser, but could launch Thaw.jar > by hand. Now however, that doesn't even work. "Firefox can't > establish a connection to the server at 127.

Re: [freenet-support] High cpu usage when starting build 1229

2009-08-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
tart the node :|. Smells like some kind of infinite loop in the FCP handlers? On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:47:27 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Ever since updating to build 1229, my java-freenet process takes up > far too much cpu time than it should -- nothing is in the global > queue and I de

[freenet-support] High cpu usage when starting build 1229

2009-08-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
Ever since updating to build 1229, my java-freenet process takes up far too much cpu time than it should -- nothing is in the global queue and I deleted my node.db4o. Advanced stats page shows 1 thread is running with priority 1, 26 with prio 5 (19 waiting), 57 with prio 7 (16 waiting). But which i

Re: [freenet-support] 301 Moved Permanently ... ugh

2009-08-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:04:07 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:29:35 Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> For the past few Freenet builds, fproxy's behavior has changed > >> whereby it seems

[freenet-support] 301 Moved Permanently ... ugh

2009-08-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
For the past few Freenet builds, fproxy's behavior has changed whereby it seems to use http "301 Moved Permanently" to redirect downloads of the form 'http://localhost:/c...@../filename' to 'freenet:c...@..' ... but it doesn't seem to include the filename part in the redirected location ... or

Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o

2009-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:25:26 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 03 July 2009 15:35:09 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >

Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o

2009-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development > team): > > - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - > > I had message "internal error" in dow

Re: [freenet-support] Assistance

2009-06-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:17:42 -0500, Kathryn A. Graham wrote: > Terribly, terribly frustrating. [...] I'm about to throw up my hands > and give up. That's part of the installation procedure. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.

[freenet-support] db40 "Internal error"

2009-06-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
For the past few versions of freenet, at the moment I'm using 1216, sometimes if I add stuff to the download/upload queue my node.db40 closes and fproxy outputs "Internal error" where the files should have been listed. Restarting doesn't help--only deleting node.db4o :S. Here is what gets spit int

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-06-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:14:32 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the > > > thread limit, caused by

Re: [freenet-support] Darknet port

2009-06-11 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:30:53 +0200, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > Thanks! > > I searched for explanations to backup my freemail identity, but I > haven't found. How do I backup my freemail identity? Can we have this > feature on the freemail plugin page? All your freemail identity's data is is l

Re: [freenet-support] Failed uploads with 1212

2009-06-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:44:47 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:12:52 +0200, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: > > It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal > > error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'. > > File size

Re: [freenet-support] Failed uploads with 1212

2009-06-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:12:52 +0200, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: > It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal > error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'. > File size is from 7 to 23 MB. Does this happen only for me? I have also seen that error message a few times while te

Re: [freenet-support] How to set the datastore to a different disk on osx

2009-05-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 20 May 2009 03:05:22 +0200, Jelbert Holtrop wrote: > Hi, > > I run freenet on osx and want to have freenet on a different drive > from the startup disk. However during the installation of freenet I > can only select the startup disk as destination for freenet. Is it > possible to ins

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2009-05-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote: > This is my setup: > > 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled So this creates a SOCKS proxy on the remote ssh server you're connecting to, accessable via port 81 on your local client computer. > > conecting t

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2009-05-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote: > This is my setup: > > 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled > > conecting through > > 2) A proxy at address Proxy:8080 > > 3) Connectng to my shell server runnig shh on port 443 > > If I login with ssh I c

[freenet-support] Error loading KeyExplorer

2009-05-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:30:05 +0200 (CEST), websponsor at voila.fr wrote: > I got this error : Le plugin KeyExplorer n'a pas pu ?tre charg? : > could not find class def, may a missing lib? > > I've tried reinstalling Freenet but I always got this error. > I think I've miss something, It's a fresh

Re: [freenet-support] Error loading KeyExplorer

2009-05-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:30:05 +0200 (CEST), webspon...@voila.fr wrote: > I got this error : Le plugin KeyExplorer n'a pas pu être chargé : > could not find class def, may a missing lib? > > I've tried reinstalling Freenet but I always got this error. > I think I've miss something, It's a fresh new

[freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:29:47 -0400, > Evan Daniel wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote: > >> >> Weird. ?node.db4o was an insane 375 MB. ?I deleted it and and > >> >> added a bunch of downloads. ?Now it is less th

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:29:47 -0400, > Evan Daniel wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote: > >> >> Weird.  node.db4o was an insane 375 MB.  I deleted it and and > >> >> added a bunch of downloads.  Now it is less th

[freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-05-10 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread > limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread > usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). > > I believe this

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-05-10 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread > limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread > usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). > > I believe this

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > > > wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wro

[freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:38:10 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 15:26:12 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: > > > Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to > > > ERROR for now, a

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > > > wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wro

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:38:10 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 15:26:12 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: > > > Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to > > > ERROR for now, a

[freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:16 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > What OS do you use for Freenet? Gentoo Linux, amd64 > What is your current datastore size set to? 8GiB > What is your output bandwidth limit set to? 9KB/s > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? 7KB/s (average, my ISP thro

[freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: > Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to ERROR > for now, as with NORMAL level it logs ~2Mb per minute, adding > noticeably to overall disk contention. Maybe turning off logging helps? Does Juiceman also have logging

Re: [freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:16 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > What OS do you use for Freenet? Gentoo Linux, amd64 > What is your current datastore size set to? 8GiB > What is your output bandwidth limit set to? 9KB/s > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? 7KB/s (average, my ISP thro

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: > Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to ERROR > for now, as with NORMAL level it logs ~2Mb per minute, adding > noticeably to overall disk contention. Maybe turning off logging helps? Does Juiceman also have logging

[freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-05-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:46:37 -0400, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> 1) CHK-keys are already long enough > > > > Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough to be > > f

Re: [freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-05-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:46:37 -0400, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetw...@web.de wrote: > >> 1) CHK-keys are already long enough > > > > Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough to be > > func

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 1 May 2009 11:23:39 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its > > source code to Git. > > What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the webs

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 1 May 2009 11:23:39 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its > > source code to Git. > > What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the webs

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its > source code to Git. What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the website should be updated to include it?)

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its > source code to Git. What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the website should be updated to include it?) ___ Support

[freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > ... IF the 3 nodes which stored it to their datastores are online > when you fetch and there aren't any problems contacting them (e.g. on > darknet they might have swapped). I'm still a little confused about what a routing key is. You

[freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:15:43 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote: > > 1. It seems that when keys are posted on FMS (not so much frost), > > they often get chopped off at 80 characters, leaving the user to > > remove the newlines by hand. If the

Re: [freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > ... IF the 3 nodes which stored it to their datastores are online > when you fetch and there aren't any problems contacting them (e.g. on > darknet they might have swapped). I'm still a little confused about what a routing key is. You

Re: [freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:15:43 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote: > > 1. It seems that when keys are posted on FMS (not so much frost), > > they often get chopped off at 80 characters, leaving the user to > > remove the newlines by hand. If the

[freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-23 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > GORY DETAILS: > > Currently we use: > CHK@,, > > (Filenames afterwards are manifests, and therefore impact on the CHK) Isn't the first part supposed to be the data hash, and not a routing key. And what is a routing key anyways? :P Ho

Re: [freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-23 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > GORY DETAILS: > > Currently we use: > CHK@,, > > (Filenames afterwards are manifests, and therefore impact on the CHK) Isn't the first part supposed to be the data hash, and not a routing key. And what is a routing key anyways? :P Ho

[freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-04-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too many connections to fproxy. But, nevertheless, shouldn't th

[freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-04-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too many connections to fproxy. But, nevertheless, shouldn't th

[freenet-support] uninstall comment page error - suggestions

2009-03-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:14:02 -0700, Mike Steiner wrote: > Here are my suggestions - not sure if they went through: > > Have some easy way to pull over BitTorrent content (for example, after > downloading something with a BitTorrent client, use Freenet to open > that file/dir using an Import option

Re: [freenet-support] uninstall comment page error - suggestions

2009-03-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:14:02 -0700, Mike Steiner wrote: > Here are my suggestions - not sure if they went through: > > Have some easy way to pull over BitTorrent content (for example, after > downloading something with a BitTorrent client, use Freenet to open > that file/dir using an Import option

[freenet-support] using vista

2009-03-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:51:54 -0700, Keith * wrote: > > It installs fine. I just can't browse when I set the security too > high. This is my first time using it. I believe "high security" means darknet-only operation ... which means you need to manually add friends to connect to.

Re: [freenet-support] using vista

2009-03-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:51:54 -0700, Keith * wrote: > > It installs fine. I just can't browse when I set the security too > high. This is my first time using it. I believe "high security" means darknet-only operation ... which means you need to manually add friends to connect to.

[freenet-support] problem with freenet starting. Plz help!

2009-03-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:56:37 -0700 (PDT), Noyb Castagna wrote: > when attempting to start freenet, I get the browser "page load error" > message: > > ?Failed to Connect ? > ? > Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:. Is freenet running when you get this message?

Re: [freenet-support] problem with freenet starting. Plz help!

2009-03-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:56:37 -0700 (PDT), Noyb Castagna wrote: > when attempting to start freenet, I get the browser "page load error" > message: > >  Failed to Connect   >   > Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:. Is freenet running when you get this message?

[freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote: > The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic > User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use > Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream. What you are dreaming of is an entire newbie-freenet-

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote: > The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic > User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use > Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream. What you are dreaming of is an entire newbie-freenet-

[freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: > It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and *done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard first :P. In Window$, I assume, you down

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: > It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and *done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard first :P. In Window$, I assume, you down

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Memory usage was plateauing = memory usage was constantly at the > (low) maximum, and it was using 100% CPU in a vain attempt to reclaim > the last byte of memory. This is the most likely explanation by far Right. (Is it just me, or doe

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Memory usage was plateauing = memory usage was constantly at the > (low) maximum, and it was using 100% CPU in a vain attempt to reclaim > the last byte of memory. This is the most likely explanation by far Right. (Is it just me, or doe

[freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: > I get the error message: > > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two > > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are > > marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to

Re: [freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: > I get the error message: > > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two > > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are > > marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:49:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 27 Ja

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:49:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 27 Ja

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17

<    1   2   3   4   5   >