Hello Pat,
I've got some problems with different software on Vista (not with SM,
though), and cannot see complaints from other Vista users. So I guess,
Your problems will more likely have sth. to do with Your Vista config
than with SeaMonkey. But You'll have to give more information about
On 2/8/2010 8:36 PM PT, Cruz, Jaime typed:
This just started yesterday. Every time I start Seamonkey it requests
that I input the user name and password for access to the newsgroups.
I haven't done anything to Seamonkey recently.
Same thing happened here on two separate computers accessing
Ubiquity wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
* A forum like this requires knowing how to use newsgroups.
something you know nothing about
Many people use the word forum to refer to website based groups.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-08 8:16 PM, Rick Merrill wrote:
Is Users50 still in use or can I delete it under SeaMonkey 2.0?
You mean APPDATA\Mozilla\Users50\Default User\... ?
That has not been used for ~10 years. Yes, you can remove it. :-)
gracias!
LWilson wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:51 pm, LWilsontenni...@pacbell.net wrote:
I'm having a terrible time trying to publish my changes via
SeaMonkey to my webhosting company. I've never had this trouble
before. Today, I uninstalled McAfee, just in case it was a firewall
issue. I still have my Norton
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
Seriously, unless you took a poll of the userbase with a question like
Do you think posters on the SM NG represent your concerns, and the
majority answered No, your statement
Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-08 9:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-07 4:10 PM, Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
You said your users are your best user experience people. Users
communicate what is on their minds, not the workarounds they have
gotten used to.
Geoff Walker wrote:
I'm running SM 2.0.2 and just in the last few days I have been unable to
delete messages from the trash in the normal manner.
Closing and re-opening SM then allows me to delete messages from the
inbox to the trash, up to the next occasion that I empty the trash, at
which
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a minority interest. Most internet users
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a minority interest.
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a minority interest.
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a minority interest.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty
P.N. wrote:
Hello Pat,
I've got some problems with different software on Vista (not with SM,
though), and cannot see complaints from other Vista users. So I guess,
Your problems will more likely have sth. to do with Your Vista config
than with SeaMonkey. But You'll have to give more information
Smiles a écrit :
I have 9 clients using this ISP and can not setup incoming mail.
Using XP os
I always get a timeout error but do not know if it is an authentication
error.
As normal this is an unsupported mail client.
Bell doesn't support *anything* since they sold their soul to M$...
On 02/08/2010 06:25 PM, Kent Briggs wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Definitely poorly coded in SeaMonkey/Firefox?
Uh, yeah. 270 seconds of lockup vs 7 seconds. Even that piece of crap IE
doesn't do that.
I was thinking that those two issues, being html5 realated (p element)
could be an issue by a client that is checking the code. Perhap IE is
ignoring it...
I suspect it's script related because I noticed I can click the Stop
button a few seconds after entering the URL and it gets the whole
Rick Merrill wrote:
LWilson wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:51 pm, LWilsontenni...@pacbell.net wrote:
I'm having a terrible time trying to publish my changes via
SeaMonkey to my webhosting company. I've never had this trouble
before. Today, I uninstalled McAfee, just in case it was a firewall
issue. I
On 02/09/2010 09:11 AM, Kent Briggs wrote:
I was thinking that those two issues, being html5 realated (p element)
could be an issue by a client that is checking the code. Perhap IE is
ignoring it...
I suspect it's script related because I noticed I can click the Stop
button a few seconds
On 10-02-09 5:10 AM, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey
userbase.
How do you know that?
Seriously, unless you took a poll of the userbase with a question like
Do you think posters on the SM NG represent your concerns, and the
I have SM 2.0.2 on two computers, one with windowsxp and one with vista.
Until today, I was receiving email on the same account with whichever
pc I was using. Today, however, on the vista pc, when I went to read my
email, there were no new mails, and when I demanded that it download
mails,
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
And Tidy Extension (HTML Validator) both in SM and FF show 29 error
and 2 warnings just on the opening page.
Thanks, I already told them the W3C validator returns 8
Margo Guda wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install some of the search plugins listed on mozilla add
ons as compatible with SM 2. I'm using 2.02 now. When I try to install
the search plugin, such as the rapidshare file finder, a message pops up
saying Sorry you need a mozilla capable browser such as
Rufus skriver:
I was, and surprisingly so...I immediately liked the tabs, and
everything was where I would have expected it to be on a Mac. It also
didn't seem like I lost any functionality for what I do with TB like I
did with SM 2.x.x, and that was also of note.
It's funny that you mention
The manager of eternal-september news reports seeing
SeaMonkey trying to post before authenticated.
==
OK, here' what happened:
Feb 9 09:56:42 188.40.43.213 nnrpd[11306]: 24.63.xx.yy (24.63.xx.yy)
connect
Feb 9 09:56:42 188.40.43.213 nnrpd[11306]: 24.63.xx.yy post failed You
are
Rick Merrill wrote:
Pat Welch wrote:
Hi.
This has gotten to the point I'm going to have to abandon SM 2.x soon. I
never saw this in any 1.x version.
I'm on 32-bit Windows Vista SP2 running on an HP notebook with the AMD
Turion dual-core chip, 3 MB RAM.
After about 8 hours of use, suddenly
Stefan wrote:
Rufus skriver:
I was, and surprisingly so...I immediately liked the tabs, and
everything was where I would have expected it to be on a Mac. It also
didn't seem like I lost any functionality for what I do with TB like I
did with SM 2.x.x, and that was also of note.
It's funny
Chris Ilias wrote:
Personally, I've never used the Forms Manager...but the only reason I
haven't that I can determine now that I'm reading so much displeasure
about it's removal is that I couldn't determine if information it stores
is encrypted or not. If it was and a dialog box had told me
Rick Merrill wrote:
When I compose a new message (email not usenet) and enter the
to field with julie it pops up addresses including
Julie Steve comcast.net
which is none of my address books and which (as you have probably
noticed) is illegal as an address. WHERE is this? (so I can delete
Interviewed by CNN on 9/2/2010 05:41, Geoff Walker told the world:
I'm running SM 2.0.2 and just in the last few days I have been unable to
delete messages from the trash in the normal manner.
Closing and re-opening SM then allows me to delete messages from the
inbox to the trash, up to
Benoit Renard wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
Personally, I've never used the Forms Manager...but the only reason I
haven't that I can determine now that I'm reading so much displeasure
about it's removal is that I couldn't determine if information it stores
is encrypted or not. If it was and a
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-09 12:57 AM, Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
SO unless the knowledge to use a newsgroup is common knowledge, the
users here are not the best user experience people. This newsgroup is
not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
Then what's it here
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ubiquity wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
* A forum like this requires knowing how to use newsgroups.
something you know nothing about
Many people use the word forum to refer to website based groups.
I use forum to refer to any manner though which discussion can take
Daniel wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-08 9:07 PM, Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-07 4:10 PM, Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
You said your users are your best user experience people. Users
communicate what is on their minds, not the workarounds they have
gotten
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a minority interest.
BJ wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:10:25 -0700, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey
userbase.
How do you know that?
The sad fact is that nowadays usenet and nntp newsgroups in general are
now pretty much a
Forwarding to the developer newsgroups.
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:06:46 -0500, Rick Merrill wrote:
The manager of eternal-september news reports seeing
SeaMonkey trying to post before authenticated.
==
OK, here' what happened:
Feb 9 09:56:42 188.40.43.213 nnrpd[11306]:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-09 5:10 AM, BJ wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
This newsgroup is not an accurate representation of the SeaMonkey
userbase.
How do you know that?
Seriously, unless you took a poll of the userbase with a question like
Do you think posters on the SM NG represent your
On 02/09/2010 01:46 PM, Stefan wrote:
...
Oh, right: Please do not hijack this new thread with non-mac stuff ;-)
/Stefan
Oh BTW 'Mac theme (Re: Goodbye Seamonkey' is *not* a new thread...
you've simply added to the existing thread by changing the subject. Why
don't you take a clue and
Stefan wrote:
Rufus skriver:
I was, and surprisingly so...I immediately liked the tabs, and
everything was where I would have expected it to be on a Mac. It also
didn't seem like I lost any functionality for what I do with TB like I
did with SM 2.x.x, and that was also of note.
It's funny
Phillip Jones wrote:
Benoit Renard wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
Personally, I've never used the Forms Manager...but the only reason I
haven't that I can determine now that I'm reading so much displeasure
about it's removal is that I couldn't determine if information it
stores
is encrypted or
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:25:25 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Sqwertz wrote:
Seamonkey 2.0.2, I have an entry in my address book that points to 8 or
9 addresses. I can add names/addresses, but I can't delete or edit
anything. At least not that I can see.
How do you delete names from the list?
On 2/8/2010 5:32 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:50:34 -0500, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 2/6/2010 11:25 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:56:53 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Good to hear! The quickstart stuff won't come back in 2.0.x though,
unless someone comes
On 10-02-09 9:29 PM, Rufus wrote:
My argument is that the collective opinions of any userbase in any
discussion forum is the best dataset for user experience, and that to
ignore it - in any venue - is folly in the long run. No matter what your
hired gun may say.
Then we're going in circles.
44 matches
Mail list logo
