that installation is easy to do. If I could either shrink the icon
or install the hybrid manually into SeaMonkey, I would use it, but as
things are, I do not consider either plugin usable. I suppose there
is no bookmarklet that would allow manual installation of search
plugins into SeaMonkey
to do. If I could either shrink the icon
or install the hybrid manually into SeaMonkey, I would use it, but as
things are, I do not consider either plugin usable. I suppose there
is no bookmarklet that would allow manual installation of search
plugins into SeaMonkey?
If the only issue is the size
icon or install the hybrid manually into SeaMonkey, I would
use it, but as things are, I do not consider either plugin usable.
I suppose there is no bookmarklet that would allow manual installation of
search plugins into SeaMonkey?
___
support-seamonkey mail
EE wrote:
Is there any way to add a search plugin manually to SeaMonkey? I found
and was able to edit a search plugin, which was then easy to install in
Pale Moon's profile, but SeaMonkey haa no searchplugins directory in its
profile any more.
I found a search plugin in
Is there any way to add a search plugin manually to SeaMonkey? I found and
was able to edit a search plugin, which was then easy to install in Pale
Moon's profile, but SeaMonkey haa no searchplugins directory in its profile
any more.
I found a search plugin in addons.thunderbird.net for
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/27/2018 9:46 AM, EE wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
"For enterprise user
On 12/27/18 12:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/27/2018 9:46 AM, EE wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR
On 12/27/2018 9:46 AM, EE wrote:
> Nuno Silva wrote:
>> On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
>>>> What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>&g
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
"For enterprise users who require Java in particular, Firefox 52
Extended Su
x64 only supports Flashfor ages now. You need an x86 version.
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
"For enterprise
On 2018-12-25, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
>> What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
>
> "For enterprise users who require Java in particular,
WaltS48 wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
"For enterprise users who require Java in particular, Firefox 52 Extended
Support Release
(ESR) will keep the
On 12/25/18 4:16 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
I believe it is this one based on Firefox 52.0 ESR.
"For enterprise users who require Java in particular, Firefox 52
Extended Support Release (ESR) will keep the plug-in support en
What is the last SM ESR to use npapi plugins?
Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Lenovo R60e Celeron.
Grab a barebone T61 15.4 or 14.1 with Intel Graphics from ebay. You
usually can have them for small change now. You can use the keyboard,
battery, memory and harddisk from the 60. Using one with Windows and is
fine for SeaMonkey. Should be
M.Ross wrote:
I tried upgrading to 14.04 LTS shortly after it released, years ago. Not
workable on this Lenovo R60e Celeron. So forget 16.04/or better. Most
errors that occurred over the years since I installed 12.04 LTS proved
to be graphical - according to Ubuntu -- Not Debian nor Ubuntu
lso the processor and ram should be upgradable on the 60.
FRG
M.Ross wrote:
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More (fwd)
Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:09 -0800 NoOp wrote:
On 2/28/2018 8:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Le
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More (fwd)
Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:09 -0800 NoOp wrote:
On 2/28/2018 8:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
Via
pdates will also stay broken. Mozilla denied the project access to the update
server. We now need to set up our own and this will take time.
FRG
M.Ross wrote:
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
On 2018-02-28 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Brows
On 2/28/2018 8:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
> Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
>
> Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
>
> Via Linux Seamonkey v2.49.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
You might want to upgrade to 16.04.2 LTS:
http://rele
WaltS48 wrote:
Can Seamonkey Browser be easily extracted from the Suite? Just use the
browser and bookmarks? No Chat, Composer, Mail/News/Addressbook/ etc? I
don't use more than browser and bookmarks anyway. Alpine is still the
most reliable and usable for mail/news service.
Separated from
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
On 2018-02-28 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
...
Thu, 1 Mar 2018 08:50 +0100 Frank-Rainer
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:55 -0500 WaltS48 wrote:
On 02/28/2018 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
Via
/SeaMonkey/seamonkey-project-org/
File a bug and add a patch.
Set a reviewer. You can add me if you want.
Only filing a bug won't get it fixed btw.
FRG
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 2018-02-28 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing
On 2018-02-28 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
Via Linux Seamonkey v2.49.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Select: Top Menu - Help - About Plugins -- and see:
-snip-
Installed
On 02/28/2018 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
Via Linux Seamonkey v2.49.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Select: Top Menu - Help - About Plugins -- and see:
-snip-
Installed
M.Ross wrote:
Via Linux Seamonkey v2.49.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Are you saying you are still running 12.04.5 LTS?
Dude you need to upgrade! ;-)
12.04 is well passed its sell-by date. You should be on at lease 14.04
LTS and that release goes EOL next year and 16.04 would be a better long
Re: Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:33 -0500 WaltS48 wrote:
On 2/28/18 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
I appreciate the efforts of the volunteer coders working on Seamonkey! But
too much seems amiss and not solvable in reasonable time frames
On 2/28/18 11:13 AM, M.Ross wrote:
I appreciate the efforts of the volunteer coders working on Seamonkey!
But too much seems amiss and not solvable in reasonable time frames.
Modularize Seamonkey, separate it into individual - workable -
applications.
Those are called Firefox and
Missing? URL at: Browser Top Menu - Help - About Plugins - Learn More
Am I missing something? No Webmaster? So, why advertise it?
Via Linux Seamonkey v2.49.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Select: Top Menu - Help - About Plugins -- and see:
-snip-
Installed plugins
Missing something? Some plugins
j.e.laba...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 8:11:08 AM UTC-5, Nuno Silva wrote:
>> On 2017-11-06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>>
>>> Currently all are a problem because webextension support is not there
>>> yet.
>>
>> Is addons.mozilla.org non-webextension-friendly, or should we
On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 8:11:08 AM UTC-5, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2017-11-06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>
> > Currently all are a problem because webextension support is not there
> > yet.
>
> Is addons.mozilla.org non-webextension-friendly, or should we start
> looking elsewhere for
Lee wrote:
On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Enabled plugins are:
* VLC Web Plugin
* Adobe Acrobat
* Java(TM) Playform SE 8
You're a braver man than I, Gunga Din.
Have you seen https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102214/discuss
A remote attacker can exploit
On 12/24/17, David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> On 12/24/2017 2:24 PM, Lee wrote:
>> On 12/24/17, David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 12/24/2017 12:39 PM, Lee wrote:
>>>> On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourme
On 12/24/2017 2:24 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 12/24/17, David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/24/2017 12:39 PM, Lee wrote:
>>> On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Enabled plugins are:
>>>> * VLC
On 12/24/17, David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> On 12/24/2017 12:39 PM, Lee wrote:
>> On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Enabled plugins are:
>>> * VLC Web Plugin
>>> * Adobe Acrobat
>>> * Ja
On 12/24/2017 12:39 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>>
>> Enabled plugins are:
>> * VLC Web Plugin
>> * Adobe Acrobat
>> * Java(TM) Playform SE 8
>
> You're a braver man than I, Gunga Din.
>
> Have you se
On 12/24/17, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>
> Enabled plugins are:
> * VLC Web Plugin
> * Adobe Acrobat
> * Java(TM) Playform SE 8
You're a braver man than I, Gunga Din.
Have you seen https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102214/discuss
A remote attacker can exp
sion, so it will
>>>> > continue to work when Firefox upgrades to 57 in just 9 days from
>>>> > when I post this posting.
>>>>
>>>> So the problem will exist when SM will upgrade to a certains point ...
>>>>
>>>> Will tha
irefox upgrades to 57 in just 9 days from
> when I post this posting.
So the problem will exist when SM will upgrade to a certains point ...
Will that means that all Plugins will cease functionning ?
Plugins are Flash, Silverlight and so on.
Extensions are uBlock Origin, NoScript and the like
t when SM will upgrade to a certains point ...
Will that means that all Plugins will cease functionning ?
Plugins are Flash, Silverlight and so on.
Extensions are uBlock Origin, NoScript and the like.
uBlock Origin web extension won't work in SeaMonkey, nor will any
other web extension.
Users will
ins point ...
Will that means that all Plugins will cease functionning ?
Plugins are Flash, Silverlight and so on.
Extensions are uBlock Origin, NoScript and the like.
uBlock Origin web extension won't work in SeaMonkey, nor will any other
web extension.
Users will be stuck using old XUL e
I have readed this:
> uBlock Origin is already written as pure WebExtension, so it will
> continue to work when Firefox upgrades to 57 in just 9 days from
> when I post this posting.
So the problem will exist when SM will upgrade to a certains point ...
Will that means that al
Plans have not been finalized and its for the council to decide but I
think yes, we will see a 2.49ESR.
Check the latest Status Meeting notes where this has been discussed:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2016-12-06
FRG
Mason83 wrote:
use Gecko Media Player
anymore next
add-ons will be supported at least until the end of 2017.
>>
>> References:
>>
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/
>> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2016/07/20/reducing-adobe-flash-usage-in-firefox/
>> https
s:
>
> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/
> https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2016/07/20/reducing-adobe-flash-usage-in-firefox/
> https://www.fxsitecompat.com/en-CA/docs/2016/plug-in-support-has-been-dropped-other-than-flash/
copy your gecko-mediaplayer files over to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Instead of coping I created symlinks, and it seems to work well so far.
Thanks for your help.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozil
/ SeaMonkey devs can do about it.
>
> Binary Add-ons will stop working in SeaMonkey 2.50.
>
> Only normal add-ons will be supported at least until the end of 2017.
References:
https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/
https://blog.mozilla.org/f
rename pluginreg.dat to pluginreg.dat_bak
Restart SeaMonkey and see if your plugins are back.
I am writing this email with SeaMonkey 2.40. Everything is fine. The
problem seems to be that the Aurora version is not picking up plugins
that are stored _outside_ the SM profile (see directory list below),
On 12/08/2016 06:24 PM, Piscium wrote:
> On 9 December 2016 at 01:31, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> # ls /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
>>> gecko-mediaplayer-dvx.so gecko-mediaplayer-rm.so
>>> gecko-mediaplayer-wmp.so libjavaplugin
On 9 December 2016 at 01:31, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
>> # ls /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
>> gecko-mediaplayer-dvx.so gecko-mediaplayer-rm.so
>> gecko-mediaplayer-wmp.so libjavaplugin.so
>> gecko-mediaplayer-qt.so gecko-mediaplayer.so
uginreg.dat_bak
>> Restart SeaMonkey and see if your plugins are back.
>
> I am writing this email with SeaMonkey 2.40. Everything is fine. The
> problem seems to be that the Aurora version is not picking up plugins
> that are stored _outside_ the SM profile (see directory
On 9 December 2016 at 00:22, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
> Could be that your pluginreg.dat file is corrupted. Close SeaMonkey and
> goto
> ~/.mozilla/seamonkey/
> and rename pluginreg.dat to pluginreg.dat_bak
> Restart SeaMonkey and see if your plugins ar
On 12/08/2016 03:33 PM, Piscium wrote:
> On 8 December 2016 at 23:04, Piscium <grok...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fedora amd64 I tried a Alkala build and the SM Aurora build
>> available in the SM website and I had the same problem in both: all
>> the plugins that I
On 8 December 2016 at 23:04, Piscium <grok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fedora amd64 I tried a Alkala build and the SM Aurora build
> available in the SM website and I had the same problem in both: all
> the plugins that I have installed with the Fedora package manager
> (Gec
On Fedora amd64 I tried a Alkala build and the SM Aurora build
available in the SM website and I had the same problem in both: all
the plugins that I have installed with the Fedora package manager
(Gecko, Flash, IcedTea) don't appear (about:plugins is empty), also
all the dictionaries are gone
duminică, 13 martie 2011, 08:09:48 UTC+2, Jim P a scris:
> nr wrote:
> > After opening up the Add-on Manager, the Extensions page has a 'Find
> > Updates' option. The Plugins page does not have this, so how does one
> > update the Plugins (I have ten showing here)?
&
Seamonkey tells me on some pages that their contents cannot be shown
completely because of missing plugins but not which is missing. How can
i recognize which plugin(s) is (are) missing?
--
Liebe Grüße, Gerd
Satelliten FAQ
http://www.satgerd.de
define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and extensions, the Wikipedia
description reflects reality. When I open the Add-ons Manager, the
items under Extensions are indeed as described in the second
bulltet on
the Wikipedia page; and the items unde
to enhance in any way a
>>>>>>>>>>> standard release. I explicitly disable some longtime features
>>>>>>>>>>> such as cookies, JavaScript, and site specified colors/backgrounds.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>&
On Sunday, March 13, 2011 at 7:44:30 AM UTC+8, nr wrote:
> After opening up the Add-on Manager, the Extensions page has a 'Find
> Updates' option. The Plugins page does not have this, so how does one
> update the Plugins (I have ten showing here)?
>
> Thanks for any assistance.
tion between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and extensions, the Wikipedia
description reflects reality. When I open the Add-ons Manager, the
items under Extensions are indeed as described in the second bulltet on
the Wikipedia page; and the items under Plugins are
unds.
Go to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in#Computing>. There
are four
bullets; the first two are relevant.
Thank you. When I said "official definition" I should have said
something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension'
/wiki/Plug-in#Computing>. There
are four
bullets; the first two are relevant.
Thank you. When I said "official definition" I should have said
something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually us
;>>> I for one have never seen the need to enhance in any way a
>>>>>>>>> standard release. I explicitly disable some longtime features
>>>>>>>>> such as cookies, JavaScript, and site specified colors/backgrounds.
>>>>>>
uting>. There are four
bullets; the first two are relevant.
Thank you. When I said "official definition" I should have said
something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and
you. When I said "official definition" I should have said
something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and extensions, the Wikipedia
description reflects reality. When I open t
nd site specified colors/backgrounds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in#Computing>. There are four
>>>>>> bullets; the first two are relevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you. When
id "official definition" I should have said
something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and extensions, the Wikipedia
description reflects reality. When I open the Add-ons
sable some longtime features
>>>>> such as cookies, JavaScript, and site specified colors/backgrounds.
>>>>>
>>>> Go to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in#Computing>. There are four
>>>> bullets; the first two are relevant.
>>>>
ot;How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension' ?"
From actually using both plugins and extensions, the Wikipedia
description reflects reality. When I open the Add-ons Manager, the
items under Extensions are indeed as described in the second bulltet on
t
g-in#Computing>. There are four
>> bullets; the first two are relevant.
>>
>
> Thank you. When I said "official definition" I should have said
> something like "How does SeaMonkey (or Mozilla) define the
> distinction between a 'plugin' and an 'extension'
On 2/24/2016 6:26 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/24/2016 2:04 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 2/23/2016 7:46 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
[snip]
Yes, I know the difference between a plugin and an extension. ...
But some readers, including myself [even though around since
Netscape 4.x], do not.
On 2/24/2016 2:04 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/23/2016 7:46 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Yes, I know the difference between a plugin and an extension. ...
>>
>
> But some readers, including myself [even though around since
> Netscape 4.x], do not.
> Could you point to an official
On 2/23/2016 7:46 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
[snip]
Yes, I know the difference between a plugin and an extension. ...
But some readers, including myself [even though around since
Netscape 4.x], do not.
Could you point to an official definition of the terms "plugin"
and "extension"?
I for one
On 2/23/2016 5:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> David E. Ross composed on 2016-02-23 15:31 (UTC-0800):
>
>> Are plugins no longer going to work with Mozilla-based applications? I
>> do not have many, but those that I do have I use frequently.
>
> Don't be confusing plugins wi
David E. Ross composed on 2016-02-23 15:31 (UTC-0800):
> Are plugins no longer going to work with Mozilla-based applications? I
> do not have many, but those that I do have I use frequently.
Don't be confusing plugins with extensions. Shockwave, Silverlight, Java and
Flash are ex
On 02/23/2016 06:31 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Almost four years ago, I submitted bug # to request user-oriented
documentation of the Blocklist capability. This capability can cause
plugins to be disabled because they are known to contain malware.
Today, a comment was posted to that bug report
On 02/23/2016 06:31 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Almost four years ago, I submitted bug # to request user-oriented
documentation of the Blocklist capability. This capability can cause
plugins to be disabled because they are known to contain malware.
Today, a comment was posted to that bug report
Almost four years ago, I submitted bug # to request user-oriented
documentation of the Blocklist capability. This capability can cause
plugins to be disabled because they are known to contain malware.
Today, a comment was posted to that bug report that says:
> Is this still needed
nguyenlonme...@gmail.com wrote on 26/01/2016 18:17:
Vào 06:44:30 UTC+7 Chủ Nhật, ngày 13 tháng 3 năm 2011, nr đã viết:
After opening up the Add-on Manager, the Extensions page has a 'Find
Updates' option. The Plugins page does not have this, so how does one
update the Plugins (I have ten
Ray_Net wrote:
nguyenlonme...@gmail.com wrote on 26/01/2016 18:17:
Vào 06:44:30 UTC+7 Chủ Nhật, ngày 13 tháng 3 năm 2011, nr đã viết:
After opening up the Add-on Manager, the Extensions page has a 'Find
Updates' option. The Plugins page does not have this, so how does one
update the Plugins
David E. Ross wrote on 10/10/2015 17:55:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them important. They are:
QuickTime
Adobe Acrobat (actually Adobe
On 10/10/2015 11:55 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them important. They are:
QuickTime
Adobe Acrobat (actually Adobe
David E. Ross wrote:
> Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
>
Where is this mentioned?
Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Edmund Wong wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
Where is this mentioned?
Google is your friend:
<https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/>
<http://arstechnica.com/information-technolog
Lemon Juice wrote on 12/10/2015 00:01:
On 2015-10-10 17:55, David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them important. They are:
QuickTime
On 10/12/2015 04:21 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Lemon Juice wrote on 12/10/2015 00:01:
On 2015-10-10 17:55, David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them
WaltS48 wrote on 12/10/2015 13:36:
On 10/12/2015 04:21 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Lemon Juice wrote on 12/10/2015 00:01:
On 2015-10-10 17:55, David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number
On 12.10.2015 11:01, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Where is this mentioned?
Hello,
and in the mozilla-blog
<https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/>
(for German users: <http://planet.mozilla.de/>)
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
On 12.10.2015 11:01, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Where is this mentioned?
Hello,
and in the mozilla-blog
<https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/>
(for German users: <http://planet.mozilla.de/>)
Entschuldigen Sie
Oops, I meant to say
"I didn't /ask/ the question, ..."
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 12.10.2015 22:42, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
damned, I need new glasses :-/
Rainer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 2015-10-10 17:55, David E. Ross wrote:
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them important. They are:
QuickTime
Adobe Acrobat (actually Adobe
Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016.
While the number of plugins I have is not as large as the number of
extensions, I consder every one of them important. They are:
QuickTime
Adobe Acrobat (actually Adobe Reader, not the writer)
RealPlayer
Daniel wrote:
On 25/03/15 01:19, pjdkru...@gmail.com wrote:
Mozilla never really got any of that part of the Addons Manager
working correctly in Firefox, so SeaMonkey has the same weirdness.
Mozilla is trying to get away from recommending Plugins so I suspect
in the near future some
On 25/03/15 01:19, pjdkru...@gmail.com wrote:
Mozilla never really got any of that part of the Addons Manager working
correctly in Firefox, so SeaMonkey has the same weirdness. Mozilla is trying
to get away from recommending Plugins so I suspect in the near future some of
that stuff
On 03/25/2015 05:11 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 25/03/15 01:19, pjdkru...@gmail.com wrote:
Mozilla never really got any of that part of the Addons Manager
working correctly in Firefox, so SeaMonkey has the same weirdness.
Mozilla is trying to get away from recommending Plugins so I suspect
in the near
Mozilla never really got any of that part of the Addons Manager working
correctly in Firefox, so SeaMonkey has the same weirdness. Mozilla is trying
to get away from recommending Plugins so I suspect in the near future some of
that stuff will be ripped out. If you want a specific Plugin, you
I was updating/re-installing some extensions and plug-ins so went to
about:addons, did the Extensions and then went to Plugins
I have no Plugins installed so, in the middle of the screen, there is a
little sub-screen stating You don't have any add-ons of this type
installed and a button
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
