Re: Is Chrome the future on DeskTop ?

On 1/9/20 5:28 PM, Ray_Net wrote: <https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/desktop/worldwide> The future started in 2013. <https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/desktop/worldwide/2013> -- OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04LTS - Gnome Desktop https://www.thunderbird.n

Is Chrome the future on DeskTop ?

___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Will seamonkey support filelink in the future?

I assume it is a yes if future SeaMonkey versions are going to use the later Thunderbird versions. On 9/20/2019 1:37 PM, Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote: Hi folks, I wondering about no support for filelink in seamonkey. Thunderbird supports a feature for sharing big attachments by uploading them

Will seamonkey support filelink in the future?

Hi folks, I wondering about no support for filelink in seamonkey. Thunderbird supports a feature for sharing big attachments by uploading them to a share portal (e.g. via WebDAV, to dropbox or other products) and only delivering a link to these files within the mail. Is there a plan to

Re: Future of seamonkey: support newsgroups

On 9/11/2018 4:06 PM, Nuno Silva wrote: It seems Seamonkey is moving away from Mozilla infrastructure. Does anybody know if there will be changes regarding the current support newsgroups at news.mozilla.org? (This newsgroup (netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey) is not controlled in any way by

Re: "Re: Future releases"

There will still be 2.49.x ESR releases. Plan is/was to do a 2.56 ESR later but with so much broken and the infrastucture failing it will be some time. FRG Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/10/11/re-future-releases/ ___ support

"Re: Future releases"

https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/10/11/re-future-releases/ -- "The ant has made him(here!)self illustrious; Through constant industry industrious.; So what? Would you be calm and placid; If you were full of formic acid?" --Ogden Nash (The Ant) Note: A fixed width font (Courier,

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: On 06/19/2017 08:15 AM, Dirk Munk wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: No 64 bit version of Firefox or Seamonkey supports a Java plugin. U... no... my 64 bit version of Firefox AND my 64 bit version of Seamonkey both work quite well with the OpenJDK

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

On 06/19/2017 08:15 AM, Dirk Munk wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: No 64 bit version of Firefox or Seamonkey supports a Java plugin. U... no... my 64 bit version of Firefox AND my 64 bit version of Seamonkey both work quite well with the OpenJDK plug in. -- Jaime

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

On 6/19/17 8:41 AM, Larry S. wrote: Dirk Munk wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

On 6/19/17 8:41 AM, Larry S. wrote: Dirk Munk wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

Dirk Munk wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with 2.50 the pref has been removed because

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with 2.50 the pref has been removed because it is no longer

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with 2.50 the pref has been removed because it is no longer guaranteed that plugins

Re: Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

The x86 52 ESR still supports plugins. You just need to set plugin.load_flash_only to false in about:config. This is the default for 2.48 and 2.49.1 build from the ESR branch. Starting with 2.50 the pref has been removed because it is no longer guaranteed that plugins other than Flash will

Java plugin in future SeaMonkey releases?

I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey 2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Future of Thunderbird / Seamonkey mail module

David E. Ross wrote: There are other differences. I think the user interface for SeaMonkey is far superior to the UI for Firefox. Also, some user tailoring capabilities that have been removed from Firefox still exist in SeaMonkey. Although many people use web based email (cloud based email),

Re: SeaMonkey's future - was [Re: seamonkey UI]

On 12/21/2015 11:50 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: I generally surf with cookies and JavaScript disabled unless they are *ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED*. Just a couple of points on above. With cookies disabled you will generally eliminate doing any useful functions that the modern

Re: SeaMonkey's future - was [Re: seamonkey UI]

Richard Owlett wrote: I generally surf with cookies and JavaScript disabled unless they are *ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED*. Just a couple of points on above. With cookies disabled you will generally eliminate doing any useful functions that the modern Internet serves such as shopping, banking,

SeaMonkey's future - was [Re: seamonkey UI]

On 12/21/2015 4:17 AM, Desiree asked: [SNIP] I've been wondering what will happen to SeaMonkey when Fx dies next year. When XUL extensions and all complete themes for Fx are killed that kills Fx and it will be only an imitation of Chrome browser then. Since so much of SeaMonkey now is Fx code

Re: SeaMonkey's future - was [Re: seamonkey UI]

Richard Owlett wrote: On 12/21/2015 4:17 AM, Desiree asked: [SNIP] I've been wondering what will happen to SeaMonkey when Fx dies next year. When XUL extensions and all complete themes for Fx are killed that kills Fx and it will be only an imitation of Chrome browser then. Since so much of

Re: Future of Thunderbird / Seamonkey mail module

On 05/12/2015 21:59, S Slicer wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> Mozilla Wants To Split Off Its Thunderbird Email/Chat Client, Says Mitchell >> Baker Memo >> http://techcrunch.com/2015/11/30/thunderbird-flies-away-from-mozilla/ >> > The main difference between FireFox and SeaMonkey, is that SeaMonkey >

Re: Future of Thunderbird / Seamonkey mail module

On 12/5/2015 12:59 PM, S Slicer wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> Mozilla Wants To Split Off Its Thunderbird Email/Chat Client, Says Mitchell >> Baker Memo >> http://techcrunch.com/2015/11/30/thunderbird-flies-away-from-mozilla/ >> > The main difference between FireFox and SeaMonkey, is that SeaMonkey

Future of Thunderbird / Seamonkey mail module

Mozilla Wants To Split Off Its Thunderbird Email/Chat Client, Says Mitchell Baker Memo http://techcrunch.com/2015/11/30/thunderbird-flies-away-from-mozilla/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Future of Thunderbird / Seamonkey mail module

On 12/03/2015 05:12 AM, Mason83 wrote: Mozilla Wants To Split Off Its Thunderbird Email/Chat Client, Says Mitchell Baker Memo http://techcrunch.com/2015/11/30/thunderbird-flies-away-from-mozilla/ Old news. New news. These discussions are at a very early stage. Finding the right solution

Re: The Future of Developing Firefox Add-ons

On 8/21/2015 11:37 AM, Sailfish wrote: REF: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/ tl;dr [excerpt quote=\ We are implementing a new extension API, called WebExtensions—largely compatible with the model used by Chrome and Opera—to make

Re: The future

Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept

Re: The future

Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for

Re: The future

Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and searches. Nothing similar to

Re: The future

Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and searches. Nothing

Re: The future

Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and searches. Nothing

Re: The future

Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and

Re: The future

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 25/03/2013 04:37, Ray_Net told the world: What about Pegasus ? Entirely separate product. Closed source. Older than Thunderbird. In fact, not only that, but older than Mozilla, older than Netscape, and only slightly younger than Eudora. The last time

Re: The future

Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and searches. Nothing similar to Thunderbird at all. You should go look at

Re: The future

Janine Starykowicz wrote: Rufus wrote: MCBastos wrote: It has been a long time since I last tried Opera's mail feature, but from what I remember, their M2 mail client was rather like Gmail in that it eschewed the concept of folders for tags and searches. Nothing similar to Thunderbird at all.

Re: The future

MCBastos wrote, On 25/03/2013 03:40: Interviewed by CNN on 24/03/2013 22:10, Rufus told the world: But really, I can't quite see that happening...because SM, Opera, and standalone TB - they all seem to use the same underpinnings, so I'd wager someone will pick up the slack. I would think the

Re: The future

Robert Kaiser wrote: Ed Mullen schrieb: I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. Mozilla is not ditching Thunderbird, it's being maintained and getting one major release per year, roughly (coinciding with the ESRs), where new features

The future

I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. I do not mean to be pessimistic, just practical. The SM project has limited resources. Does it have enough to maintain the mail/news component of SM? And, obviously, the main question, should we

Re: The future

Ed Mullen wrote: I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. I do not mean to be pessimistic, just practical. The SM project has limited resources. Does it have enough to maintain the mail/news component of SM? And, obviously, the main

Re: The future

Ed Mullen schrieb: I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. Mozilla is not ditching Thunderbird, it's being maintained and getting one major release per year, roughly (coinciding with the ESRs), where new features developed

Re: The future

Interviewed by CNN on 24/03/2013 22:10, Rufus told the world: But really, I can't quite see that happening...because SM, Opera, and standalone TB - they all seem to use the same underpinnings, so I'd wager someone will pick up the slack. I would think the Opera folks would be the most

Re: The future

Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. It not so much ditching Thunderbird as they decided that they added all the new bells and whistles they can, so there I no point doing new research. They have said

Re: The future

Robert Kaiser wrote: Ed Mullen schrieb: I am wondering, with the Mozilla org ditching Thunderbird, if SeaMonkey actually has a future. Mozilla is not ditching Thunderbird, it's being maintained and getting one major release per year, roughly (coinciding with the ESRs), where new features

Re: The future

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 24/03/2013 22:10, Rufus told the world: But really, I can't quite see that happening...because SM, Opera, and standalone TB - they all seem to use the same underpinnings, so I'd wager someone will pick up the slack. I would think the Opera folks would be

Re: Deleted Cookies Blocking Future Cookies

David E. Ross wrote: When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked -- prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this checkbox have a preference variable? Not to my knowledge. Why should it, as it is by domain? If you UNcheck the box for a particular domain

Re: Deleted Cookies Blocking Future Cookies

On 3/5/13 3:28 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked -- prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this checkbox have a preference variable? Not to my knowledge. Why should

Deleted Cookies Blocking Future Cookies

When I delete a cookie, there is a checkbox that -- if checked -- prevents its domain from setting any future cookies. Does this checkbox have a preference variable? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Are taxes too high in the U.S.? Check the bar graph at http://www.rossde.com/taxes

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Daniel wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: g I seem to remember you once said you had an intricate filtering system, now that I think a bit about it. 75 sub-folders is a *lot*! Yes, it

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Bernd Adda wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Yes, but Arnie seems to be, according to his description, getting these post-dated emails in his Inbox - which

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: snippage Aha. Well, there's the answer. Turn it on and train it (by marking Inbox spam as Junk). Your problem should go away soon enough. For multiple accounts, do each one separately, and direct the spam to the account's junk folder.

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: g I seem to remember you once said you had an intricate filtering system, now that I think a bit about it. 75 sub-folders is a *lot*! Yes, it is intricate. HOWEVER, the real problem

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Bernd Adda wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: OK, Done and working. Thanks for the help. Now, is there a way to move the Junk folder so it sits above the Inbox folder? Drag and drop doesn't work. Perhaps there is a file in the profile that can be edited? I don't know, but wonder why you would want to have the Junk

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: OK, Done and working. Thanks for the help. Now, is there a way to move the Junk folder so it sits above the Inbox folder? Drag and drop doesn't work. Perhaps there is a file in the profile that can be edited? I don't know, but wonder

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: OK, Done and working. Thanks for the help. Now, is there a way to move the Junk folder so it sits above the Inbox folder? Drag and drop doesn't work. Perhaps there is a file in the profile that can be edited? I

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: OK, Done and working. Thanks for the help. Now, is there a way to move the Junk folder so it sits above the Inbox folder? Drag and drop doesn't work. Perhaps there is a file in the profile

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: OK, Done and working. Thanks for the help. Now, is there a way to move the Junk folder so it sits above the Inbox folder? Drag and drop doesn't work. Perhaps

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: g I seem to remember you once said you had an intricate filtering system, now that I think a bit about it. 75 sub-folders is a *lot*! Yes, it is intricate. HOWEVER, the real problem is that I made all of my folders sub-folders of the

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: g I seem to remember you once said you had an intricate filtering system, now that I think a bit about it. 75 sub-folders is a *lot*! Yes, it is intricate. HOWEVER, the real problem is that I made all of

How to filter out emails with future dates?

Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date and the latest has the year 2038. I need a filter which will inspect the date and move anything with a date

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Interviewed by CNN on 25/06/2012 11:43, Arnie Goetchius told the world: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date and the latest has the year 2038. I need

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date and the latest has the year 2038. I need a filter which will inspect the date and move

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date and the latest has the year 2038. I need a filter

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Bernd Adda wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date and the latest has the year 2038

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Bernd Adda wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some have next month's date

Re: How to filter out emails with future dates?

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Bernd Adda wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty schrieb: Arnie Goetchius wrote: Using SM 2.10.1 Every day I get email spam that has a future date so that it stays on the top of my email list. These usually have tomorrow's date but some

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Alex Baer wrote: Rich Gray wrote: Alex Baer wrote: Re-creation of index files was unfortunately not done instantly in earlier versions. For large mbox files it takes ages. The whole concept slows down actions, such as copying 500 messages from one folder to another one significantly. It

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Rich Gray wrote: Alex Baer wrote: Re-creation of index files was unfortunately not done instantly in earlier versions. For large mbox files it takes ages. The whole concept slows down actions, such as copying 500 messages from one folder to another one significantly. It takes so long, at

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Alex Baer wrote: Re-creation of index files was unfortunately not done instantly in earlier versions. For large mbox files it takes ages. The whole concept slows down actions, such as copying 500 messages from one folder to another one significantly. It takes so long, at times, that I guess,

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

S. Beaulieu a écrit : Alex Baer a écrit : This may or may not have been a great idea, but it became a huge problem, when after a crash the index files were damaged, and the program was unable to repair them, and all the structure information about the hierarchy of folders was lost. When you

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:46:47 +0200, /Alex Baer/: Then I copied some mails into the new folders, and found that I can't copy anything into folder four. It is displayed in the hierarchy on the left pane, but the menu function copy to only works down to level three. One

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:46:47 +0200, /Alex Baer/: Then I copied some mails into the new folders, and found that I can't copy anything into folder four. It is displayed in the hierarchy on the left pane, but the menu function copy to only

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Alex Baer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:46:47 +0200, /Alex Baer/: Then I copied some mails into the new folders, and found that I can't copy anything into folder four. It is displayed in the hierarchy on the left pane, but the menu function

maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Hi everyone, I am new to this newsgroup, so please be patient with me, inittially. ;) My question has been asked several times in other forums and mailing lists, as it seems, certainly, but a quick web research didn't give any useful answers within the last 12 or 14 months. Of course,

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

On 9/9/11 8:47 AM, Alex Baer wrote: Hi everyone, I am new to this newsgroup, so please be patient with me, inittially. ;) My question has been asked several times in other forums and mailing lists, as it seems, certainly, but a quick web research didn't give any useful answers

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

David E. Ross wrote: On 9/9/11 8:47 AM, Alex Baer wrote: Hi everyone, I am new to this newsgroup, so please be patient with me, inittially. ;) My question has been asked several times in other forums and mailing lists, as it seems, certainly, but a quick web research didn't give

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Alex Baer a écrit : But in the Mozilla mail clients it's possible to create virtual folder hierarchies and sub- structures. And this is DANGEROUS with mbox. I have had no problems with only one level of hierarchy (i. e. flat structure) using mbox. So my request is actually: Either remove the

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

S. Beaulieu wrote: Alex Baer a écrit : But in the Mozilla mail clients it's possible to create virtual folder hierarchies and sub- structures. And this is DANGEROUS with mbox. I have had no problems with only one level of hierarchy (i. e. flat structure) using mbox. So my request is

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:06 +0200, Alex Baer wrote: Hi everyone, I am new to this newsgroup, so please be patient with me, inittially. ;) My question has been asked several times in other forums and mailing lists, as it seems, certainly, but a quick web research didn't give any

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Alex Baer a écrit : This may or may not have been a great idea, but it became a huge problem, when after a crash the index files were damaged, and the program was unable to repair them, and all the structure information about the hierarchy of folders was lost. When you say index file, do you

Re: maildir support in a future release, instead of mbox only?

Interviewed by CNN on 09/09/2011 15:11, Alex Baer told the world: Because the functionality is there, I used it, and created a multi- level hierarchy of folders, sub-folders and sub-sub-folders to organise my mail. This may or may not have been a great idea, but it became a huge problem,

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

PhillipJones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:22:21 -0700, Rufus wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. If that is so how long after

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

On 26/03/11 02:12, Rufus wrote: No, but I will - thanks for the pointer. I think I'd prefer Safari to FireFox, and TB would be a fair companion to it as a newsreader. Right now I use SM...and I may just hang in there with it once PPC support vanishes. I imagine Apple will do the same with

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Robert Kaiser schrieb: Not really, they just won't deliver updates for it or Leopard any more (they have already stopped delivering updates for Tiger a long time ago) but they have a habit of just not talking about such end-of-line decisions and just silently not do any updates any more. AFAIK

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Philipp van Hüllen wrote: Robert Kaiser schrieb: Not really, they just won't deliver updates for it or Leopard any more (they have already stopped delivering updates for Tiger a long time ago) but they have a habit of just not talking about such end-of-line decisions and just silently not do

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Philip Chee wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:22:21 -0700, Rufus wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. If that is

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Tony Mechelynck wrote: On 26/03/11 02:12, Rufus wrote: No, but I will - thanks for the pointer. I think I'd prefer Safari to FireFox, and TB would be a fair companion to it as a newsreader. Right now I use SM...and I may just hang in there with it once PPC support vanishes. I imagine Apple

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Philipp van Hüllen wrote: Robert Kaiser schrieb: Not really, they just won't deliver updates for it or Leopard any more (they have already stopped delivering updates for Tiger a long time ago) but they have a habit of just not talking about such end-of-line decisions and just silently not do

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC support ? 2. BTW What is PPC ?

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC support ? Yes - to a

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC support ? 2. BTW What

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

PhillipJones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Rufus wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important ...

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

PhillipJones wrote: Supposedly they can Use Linux. But I am too damned old to be learning a new OS system. and There is no name brand software for Linux as well. Best you can do is give to Goodwill or chunk it down the hill at the back of your house. Many of the Linux versions look just like a

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

d...@kd4e.com wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Supposedly they can Use Linux. But I am too damned old to be learning a new OS system. and There is no name brand software for Linux as well. Best you can do is give to Goodwill or chunk it down the hill at the back of your house. Many of the Linux

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Rufus wrote: I don't think there's a Linux version of Poser...or Bryce...or any of my flight sims...or the support for my recording studio. Or... Are there no alternative apps? What is Poser? What is Bryce? I know there are audio and video apps, indeed there are a number of Linux specialty

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

d...@kd4e.com wrote: Rufus wrote: I don't think there's a Linux version of Poser...or Bryce...or any of my flight sims...or the support for my recording studio. Or... Are there no alternative apps? What is Poser? Poser is a 3D animation and figure/set editing, rigging, and rendering

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

On 27/03/11 00:34, PhillipJones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. 1. Is this so important

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey

Adam Jimerson wrote: Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long compatible with PPC correct? Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC support. If that is so how long after Seamonkey 2.1 is released will support for 2.0 be dropped? SM 2.0 is

  1   2   >