Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Philip Chee
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:38:22 -0700, Ken Rudolph wrote: All well and good; but the question is why is Seamonkey 1.1.17 so much less robust than Firefox? And furthermore, why is the broken site window so useless? Will SM 2.0 be more Foxy, at least? You have to compare apples to apples:

Re: Removing Add-On

2009-07-08 Thread Martin Feitag
Brian Mailman schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Brian Mailman schrieb: I downloaded the add-on mentioned recently that places an X on each tab in order to close it with one click. I find that unlike IE the X is too large and I keep closing a tab accidentally when I want to access it instead. I

Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting this Thursday July 9th 2009

2009-07-08 Thread Ludovic Hirlimann
To make sure that Thunderbird 3.0 b3 ships with the highest quality. To make sure that nightly users did not make any important regressions, the Quality assurance team of Thunderbird is organizing a Full Functional Test of the builds that will become beta 3 itself. We will use Litmus[1] and

Re: Removing Add-On

2009-07-08 Thread Benoit Renard
Martin Feitag wrote: PS: I guess when SM is out, your problem will be solved ;-) SeaMonkey 2.54? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Daniel
Ken Rudolph wrote: There's a site which keeps crashing Seamonkey 1.1.17 when I click on it, at least lately (it didn't used to happen). The site doesn't hang when I use Firefox 3.0.11. The site is: http://www.losangelesmovietimes.com/ On the SM Help menu there is a link to Report Broken Web

Re: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3...

2009-07-08 Thread JR WG
Also sending separate Email to you, Ludovic... RE: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting Thursday July 9th 2009 Can you verify that we can test Thunderbird 3 without overwriting or losing our existing TBird 2 access or installation, in case we need to revert back to TBird 2 for some reason. We

Re: Removing Add-On

2009-07-08 Thread Martin Feitag
Benoit Renard schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: PS: I guess when SM is out, your problem will be solved ;-) SeaMonkey 2.54? Whoops, I held Shift a bit too long, should have been SM2, sry... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Should I worry

2009-07-08 Thread Barbara Norvell
I recently visited either MySpace or My Facebook page. I click on a game that I wanted to play and the weirdest thing happened. Instead of a game, something came up that looked like the ftp page that I get when I use Fireftp. It startled me and then I closed it out right away. How did this

Url won't work

2009-07-08 Thread Barbara Norvell
I use the Humana website and am having a problem with one page - the page to order my refills. You probably can't help me with that because you have to be a member and use a password. Would it help if I went to the page and gave you the source info and page info. I can get the page to come up

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Martin Feitag
Ken Rudolph schrieb: Daniel wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: There's a site which keeps crashing Seamonkey 1.1.17 when I click on it, at least lately (it didn't used to happen). The site doesn't hang when I use Firefox 3.0.11. The site is: http://www.losangelesmovietimes.com/ On the SM Help menu

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Ken Rudolph
Martin Feitag wrote: Ken Rudolph schrieb: These sites aren't exactly malware, being fairly typical of important web resources. The fact that SM 1x can't handle them, despite their deficiencies, is all the more reason that SM 2x is necessary. I'm not a beta kinda user...when IS 2.0 release

unresponsive script

2009-07-08 Thread Walter
I frequently get the following message: {A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.} (option boxes, {stop script} {continue} I am running SeaMonkey 1.1.16. I have the latest

Re: Revert To Old SeaMonkey

2009-07-08 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jim S wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT), Jimmy Lee wrote: Hello all. I am a SeaMonkey user since day 1. Just recently started biting me in the buttocks with v2. Is it possible to go back to version 1.x of SeaMonkey? I upgraded to v2 but it is just not working for me. Constant

Re: Removing Add-On

2009-07-08 Thread Brian Mailman
Martin Feitag wrote: Brian Mailman schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Brian Mailman schrieb: I downloaded the add-on mentioned recently that places an X on each tab in order to close it with one click. I find that unlike IE the X is too large and I keep closing a tab accidentally when I want to

Re: Revert To Old SeaMonkey

2009-07-08 Thread Jim S
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:05:54 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT), Jimmy Lee wrote: Hello all. I am a SeaMonkey user since day 1. Just recently started biting me in the buttocks with v2. Is it possible to go back to version 1.x of SeaMonkey? I

Re: Removing Add-On

2009-07-08 Thread Brian Mailman
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/7/2009 11:48 AM, Brian Mailman wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/6/2009 11:31 AM, Brian Mailman wrote: I downloaded the add-on mentioned recently that places an X on each tab in order to close it with one click. I find that unlike IE the X is too large and I keep

Re: unresponsive script

2009-07-08 Thread Tony
Jay Garcia wrote: On 08.07.2009 12:01, Walter wrote: --- Original Message --- I frequently get the following message: {A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.} (option

Re: Url won't work

2009-07-08 Thread Barbara Norvell
I have called them and they claim it is because I have a Mac, but can't give me any answers as to why or if they are going to fix it. David E. Ross wrote: On 7/8/2009 8:58 AM, Barbara Norvell wrote: I use the Humana website and am having a problem with one page - the page to order my

Re: SeaMonkey 1.1.17 Released

2009-07-08 Thread Bill Davidsen
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/27/2009 8:26 PM, MalcolmO wrote: I was surprised to find that it didn't notify me of a new version and (optionally) get it and install it for me. I was further surprised to find that there was no such option anywhere. Am I right about that or is it hidden somewhere?

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Martin Feitag
Ken Rudolph schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Ken Rudolph schrieb: These sites aren't exactly malware, being fairly typical of important web resources. The fact that SM 1x can't handle them, despite their deficiencies, is all the more reason that SM 2x is necessary. I'm not a beta kinda

Re: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3...

2009-07-08 Thread Daniel
JR WG wrote: Also sending separate Email to you, Ludovic... RE: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting Thursday July 9th 2009 Can you verify that we can test Thunderbird 3 without overwriting or losing our existing TBird 2 access or installation, in case we need to revert back to TBird 2 for

SeaMonkey 1.1.17 mail problems

2009-07-08 Thread »MAP«
I installed SeaMonkey 1.1.17 and my mail worked. For some reason it stopped working correctly. Now I have a big gray area on the bottom of my screen with a red arrow head on the left side. I can only open one email, then my email locks up. I have to shut down SeaMonkey, delete the process

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread Ken Rudolph
Martin Feitag wrote: PS: As said for an alpha it's very stable, don't compare it too much with other alphas you might have tested, as the codebase is pretty mature. Of course it's not recommended to replace SM1 with SM2 yet in a productivity environment but having SM2 parallely doesn't harm

Re: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3...

2009-07-08 Thread NoOp
On 07/08/2009 06:31 PM, Daniel wrote: JR WG wrote: Also sending separate Email to you, Ludovic... RE: Testing Thunderbird 3.0b3 starting Thursday July 9th 2009 Can you verify that we can test Thunderbird 3 without overwriting or losing our existing TBird 2 access or installation, in

Re: Reporting broken sites

2009-07-08 Thread NoOp
On 07/08/2009 04:49 PM, Martin Feitag wrote: Ken Rudolph schrieb: Even the thought of testing an alpha makes me shudder with angst. It seems to me that the news-mail part of SM 1x is not nearly so deficient and outdated as the browser portion. If it is Thunderbird 3 which is holding up

Re: Url won't work

2009-07-08 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/8/2009 4:06 PM, Barbara Norvell wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 7/8/2009 8:58 AM, Barbara Norvell wrote: I use the Humana website and am having a problem with one page - the page to order my refills. You probably can't help me with that because you have to be a member and use a password.