Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-03 Thread Rick Merrill
Ed Mullen wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: summan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-03 Thread Jens Hatlak
Ed Mullen wrote: Used to be I could go to the American Express login page and SM would pop up a box with the various account logins representing different accounts based on the URL. Now? I have to (as you indicate) start entering a username. But, what if user-1 is=bob... and user-2 is bob2...

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-02 Thread summan
Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when you saved user Name and Password for say Bank (but

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-02 Thread Rick Merrill
summan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when you saved user Name and Password for

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-02 Thread Rufus
Rick Merrill wrote: summan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when you saved user

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2011-02-02 Thread Ed Mullen
Rick Merrill wrote: summan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when you saved user

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread Daniel
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread John Doue
On 4/29/2010 12:57 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200,

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread Daniel
Barbara Norvell wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread Daniel
John Doue wrote: On 4/29/2010 12:57 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread Robert Kaiser
JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I just installed SM2.04 and all the ID/Password stuff works as easy as it did in SM1.19. Yay! Feels good to know that 2.x does work out well for you after all :) Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-29 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: Barbara Norvell wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200,

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-28 Thread Daniel
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Well, it may be a Cookie problem in SM2. All I know is that I need to fiddle around to get full access to

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-28 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Doue notw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb:

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-28 Thread Barbara Norvell
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:18:39 +0300, John Douenotw...@yahoo.com wrote: On 4/28/2010 1:34 PM, Daniel wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mplsjohn...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Well, it may be a Cookie problem in SM2. All I know is that I need to fiddle around to get full access to the WSJ page using SM2. Conversely, I get immediate full access using SM1, FireFox, IE, Opera, and Safari. That suggests to me that SM2 has a problem. We have mostly

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-27 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Well, it may be a Cookie problem in SM2. All I know is that I need to fiddle around to get full access to the WSJ page using SM2. Conversely, I get immediate full access using SM1, FireFox, IE, Opera,

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-27 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:48:43 -0500, JohnW-Mpls john...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:59:08 +0200, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Well, it may be a Cookie problem in SM2. All I know is that I need to fiddle around to get full access to the WSJ page using

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-27 Thread »Q«
In news:8osdncjshackykvwnz2dnuvz_sadn...@mozilla.org, J. Weaver Jr. j...@pospamsucksbox.com wrote: »Q« wrote: Innews:wfqdnbflm-u8yunwnz2dnuvz_qudn...@mozilla.org, Cruz, Jaimespamm...@bite.me wrote: [about not remembering passwords on some sites. I think if the banks are the ones that

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread John Doue
On 4/26/2010 6:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: You got it. Phillip - it's not a bug but a design change/flaw. I went to 2.x for better security but the design of ID/Password handling went overboard. I have a few hundred bookmarks and a few dozen with

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread Daniel
L. Mark Hall wrote: I am still using seamonkey 1.17 becuase I simply cannot get the 2. seamonkey to start on my computer. I have a brand new OS install (XPSP3), and when I double click on seamonkey, nothing happens. Has this been reported before, and if not, where do I enter the bug track? LMH

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread Daniel
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:42:39 +0200, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread Robert Kaiser
JohnW-Mpls schrieb: When I go to the WSJ site with 1.x, their site comes up with a Hello, John greeting - they already know me as a customer. With 2.x. the WSJ comes up but I am restricted till I click to login and then I need to right-click for 5-15 seconds for 2.x to finally respond with my

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread Tom Pamin
Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: When I go to the WSJ site with 1.x, their site comes up with a Hello, John greeting - they already know me as a customer. With 2.x. the WSJ comes up but I am restricted till I click to login and then I need to right-click for 5-15 seconds for 2.x to

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread L. Mark Hall
For years I have never stored anything in the password manager other than the passwords for my email accounts. All other information, like banks, I enter every time I go to the site. I have always believed this to be the safest approach, though a bit less convenient. My understanding is that

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:27:53 +0200, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: When I go to the WSJ site with 1.x, their site comes up with a Hello, John greeting - they already know me as a customer. With 2.x. the WSJ comes up but I am restricted till I click to login and then I

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-26 Thread Rufus
My understanding as well, and one of the reasons I stick with 1.1.19 on my primary machine - the dialog clearly states so; it does not clearly state so in 2.x.x and so I assume the worst. But I always use a Master and wouldn't use the Manager any other way. It's also why I've never used the

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Robert Kaiser
JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. If the specific problems are filed as bug reports

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Phillip Jones
Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. If the specific problems are

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Phillip Jones
User wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread JAS
Phillip Jones wrote: User wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Rufus
JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: User wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread L. Mark Hall
I am still using seamonkey 1.17 becuase I simply cannot get the 2. seamonkey to start on my computer. I have a brand new OS install (XPSP3), and when I double click on seamonkey, nothing happens. Has this been reported before, and if not, where do I enter the bug track? LMH Rufus wrote:

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:53:10 -0400, /Phillip Jones/: That's quite a feat to have to do, especially folks like me that have trouble with spelling. So there will be a lot of folks that will go back to SM1 and FF3.0 just for that. Firefox 2.0 already had the new form/password management in place

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Robert Kaiser
Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when you saved user Name and Password for say Bank (but others) the username

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:42:39 +0200, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. That the fellow is mad about is in SM1.X when

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Cruz, Jaime
Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You didn't tell us what the specific bugs are. If the

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:53:10 -0400, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing?

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Cruz, Jaime
JohnW-Mpls wrote: You got it. Phillip - it's not a bug but a design change/flaw. I went to 2.x for better security but the design of ID/Password handling went overboard. I have a few hundred bookmarks and a few dozen with ID/Password protection. The Wall St Journal is a nice example, one of

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Phillip Jones
User wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: User wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the ID/Password processing? You

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Phillip Jones
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:53:10 -0400, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: JohnW-Mpls schrieb: I am now back to 1.19 If you like having unpatched security vulnerabilities on your computer, have fun with it! Are there any 2.x plans to fix the

Re: Phooey - Back to 1.19

2010-04-25 Thread Phillip Jones
Cruz, Jaime wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: You got it. Phillip - it's not a bug but a design change/flaw. I went to 2.x for better security but the design of ID/Password handling went overboard. I have a few hundred bookmarks and a few dozen with ID/Password protection. The Wall St Journal is a