Philipp Morger wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 19:31:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Have a look at what I wrote on NANOG. It applies perfectly well to
Switzerland too.
If all ISP's in Switzerland (or at least the large ones) would put MTAMARK
(default) records into their reverse
Marcel Stutz wrote:
Sorry abot the German one, but i think it's also in French/Italian Online soon
http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/doks/mm/content/mm_view-d.php?mmID=2280mmTopic=Internet-Kriminalität
So far I've read half-way through the report and the foundations and
conclusions until now look
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Marcel Stutz wrote:
Sorry abot the German one, but i think it's also in French/Italian Online
soon
http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/doks/mm/content/mm_view-d.php?mmID=2280mmTopic=Internet-Kriminalität
So far I've read half-way through the report and the foundations
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:03:55 +0100, Andre Oppermann said:
Reverse zone file for 10.0.0.0/24:
1.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR mail.example.com.
_send._smtp._srv.1.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. IN TXT 1
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-03.txt
Jerome Tissieres wrote:
The bandwidth points of the PA-GE is 400 so you can use it on a NPE300
(600 pts/bus max) without problem, also in slot 1 or 3 if the
I/O card have only 1 FE (200 pts). It's not a problem of bandwidth points.
But, cisco doc say with any NPE (from NPE-300 and after,
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Hi all
My wife and I are happy to announce that our daughter Anna Sophie was born
yesterday (tuesday, 19.10) at 14:15 - or in binary form: 1 + 1 = 11 :-)
while (bwäh)
sleep--;
Congratulations!!
--
Andre
___
swinog
Fabian Wenk wrote:
Hello Andre
Andre Oppermann wrote:
The only information I was able to get was a snippet of the discussion where
they were talking about the 'responsibility' of the ISPs regarding SPAM.
Doesn't sound good for us I'm afraid. I guess the ISP will be required
Felix Rauch wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
We get full unbundling in Switzerland and interconnection on leased lines.
However bitstream access will only be given for two years.
What about the anti-spam part of the proposed changes to the law? Do
you know whether
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Anyone else who cannot reach http://www.admin.ch/ and
http://www.parlament.ch/ (I intended to see the last mile debate)
Swisscom is unhappy with the outcome of that debate and IP-Plus is
the ISP of BIT. So maybe they are starting relatory measures now
in usual Bush style
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Anyone else who cannot reach http://www.admin.ch/ and
http://www.parlament.ch/ (I intended to see the last mile debate)
It's up again. The protocol can be found at
http://www.parlament.ch/ab/frameset/d/n/4705/112465/d_n_4705_112465_112466.htm
-- Matthias,
Pascal Gloor wrote:
We lost 6 peers about 30 minutes ago. Others seems to have the same.
What's wrong? Power? Switch problem?
No. At least not on the Foundry Switch. Maybe you have a Spanning-Tree
problem? The only port flapping (physical) today was AS8237.
--
Andre
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Hi all,
as you probably know Andre and I are writing a new and better BGP daemon.
We have established a test system at TIX to do some real-life testing.
Now we would like to get as many (full) feeds as possible to this box.
The test box's IP is 194.42.48.111 and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HiYa!
As a part of the new Intenet-Solution BIT, the Bundesverwaltung will
improve their Internet-Services : On the
one hand that our services will be fast and reliable for the public and on
the other hand that the bundesverwaltung-users/servcices have a fast and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HiYa!
As a part of the new Intenet-Solution BIT, the Bundesverwaltung will
improve their Internet-Services : On the
one hand that our services will be fast and reliable for the public and on
the other hand that the bundesverwaltung-users/servcices have a fast and
Gabriel Boissonnard wrote:
Hello,
Let's say we have IP transit from a provider, and would like to split it
between several customers. Number of customer is small (10).
Example:
Provider
|
| 5Mbps
|
-Our POP-
| | |
With my changed email address there is a huge lag for SWINOG posts to show
up in my inbox, something like 20 minutes.
I have checked that it is NOT my end that has a problem or is rejecting or
greylisting the swinog list.
Do others see the same delay in getting swinog list posts? Or is it just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andre!
Thanks a lot for your answer!
You are welcome. :-)
Some comments:
- Yes, we WILL peer with many ISP as possible @TIX and @CIXP, if possible
@SwissIX as well.
Great! :-)
Maybe I have to explain what we have planned in more detail:
Our Access to
Nik Hug wrote:
look's bad.
I can't reach admin.ch - and this two days before independent day.
You know what? I think the DBA proxy server in the basement of the Bundeshaus
broke down!
Maybe we should ask for a homeland security department? - their first task
might be the deployment of a
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 30.07.2004 23:51 Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
And this on sysadmin's day. What a nightmare. Tell all complaining
maybe s/on/because/ ;-) ... too much glck, glck, glck
Don't think so. Maybe the AS3303 sysadmins did not get any appreciation,
so
Steven Glogger wrote:
if i remember correctly we should also have access there to the public WLAN
(surf am see?).
maybe andre or someone else can provide some informations.
Since this afternoon you can use surfamsee gratis WLAN at the pumpstation.
There has been some problem with the Cisco
Markus Wild wrote:
sh ip bgp regexp _3320_ (next hop addrs removed)
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i81.201.32.0/20 x.x.x.x 90 50 0 702 3320 ?
*i y.y.y.y 100 50 0 286 3320 ?
We have:
1. same local
The following people have registered themselfes to SWINOG-8 but
did not show up *without* sending an cancellation of their
registration. If these people would have done that, someone else
who cares more could have come. SWINOG has only a limited number
of seats available and no-shows are very
Martin Jaggi wrote:
Blacklist Info: http://ORDB.org/lookup/?host=62.240.192.40
Maybe I am exaggerating but I don't think so.
But it is an open relay:
...
The Mailserver is open the the old @@ trick..
They have standard qmail which doesn't do the @@-Relaying unless
you configure it to
rudolphi wrote:
obviously, someone at zkb is reading the swinog-list:
553 sorry, relaying tricks are not allowed here... (#5.7.1)
I called them at about 5 o'clock and told them. They are about 50 meters
from my office (I'm in the same building as TIX/Telehouse) and I felt as
neighbors I
There will be some juggling with these two AS going on in the next few days
and weeks.
What is Internet Pipeline today on AS8271 will become AS16221 and what is
AS16221 today (Deltapoint, but operated by INTO Internet Online at the
moment) will become Internet Pipeline. Internet Pipeline will
John Morgan Salomon wrote:
Hey,
Absolutely ditto on this one. I'll mention this, since it's come up in public
discussion, but apparently a UK government agency (equivalent of the
NIPC in the US, I forget their exact name) has been contacting lots
of large companies regarding preventative
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:06:19PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Sorry, but this must be total bullshit and FUD.
Well, word is that it's an attack on any kind of
TCP connection, and that BGP is just one of the
core infrastructure protocols
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
we would like to MD5 too ...
There is an interesting discussion going on regarding the MD5 hype on
the NYIIX mailing list, where, I guess, most of you don't have access
to. It explains much about current BGP hole, which is about to be
Thomas Vogt wrote:
Hi
Some information for all Freebsd users:
http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/funding.html
Perhaps this help to get the -stable branch after 5.4 :-)
This is one of the things my call for ISPs using FreeBSD was
for. I've got many answers (privatly and public) and was
just
There are many ISPs in Switzerland using FreeBSD as their primary
operating system. So far I know that Pipeline, VIA Networks, Solnet,
Easynet, Improware and IP-Man are using it.
I've disussed with a couple of people at the last SWINOG and found that
a lot more use FreeBSD.
If you are using
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Hi all,
after upgrading from 12.2.x to 12.3.6 I see a strange behaviour. No,
there was no change in the configuration ;-). Funny thing: both SwissIX
and TIX route server behave the same way ... two boxes, yes. And yes, my
ntp does not work yet.
23:39:34:
Michel Renfer wrote:
And what's the impact? Is CIXP and TIX going to be merged?
This would make sense... (just my 0,02$)
1. CIXP is owned and run by CERN, *not* Telehouse Geneva (Hi Paolo!).
2. Telehouse Geneva is just a place where the second CIXP switch is
located.
3. Why and
I've received the information on the new BÜPF lawful interception tariffs
last week.
The changes are drastic but *not* to our disadvantage. There are only
two tariffs now. One is for requests of past data from log files and it
is CHF 538.- flat (IP Address, Login number, Email Log). The other
I would just drop it. There is nothing they can do against you. To the
contrary. If you do something *you* are the one violating laws. If you
simply block the p2p traffic of the user you are interfering with his
communication which is prohibited by telecoms law (FMG and StGB). If
you look if
Guentensperger, Robert wrote:
Hi all,
| well, i would drop it.. but migrosoft is powerfull enough to
| take steps - i suppose...
|
|I will ignore it for the moment.
I guess you should be prepared when the lawyers knock on your door.
So what!?
There is nothing the lawyers can do.
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
| If you don't have enough capacity to do the 5xx errors on the main
| mail servers then setup another (small) machine and redirect (instead
| of blocking) all connections to that box and let it emit 5xx errors.
|
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
| | If you don't have enough capacity to do the 5xx errors on the main
| | mail servers then setup another (small) machine and redirect (instead
| | of blocking) all connections to that box and let it emit 5xx
Robert Meyer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:15:22PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
| From 217.26.52.23:
| Trying 62.2.95.11...
| Connected to mx.hispeed.ch.
| Escape character
Daniel Lorch wrote:
hi
ok, improved version
1. our fake smtpd server, save as smtpd.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo '220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP'
read input
echo '550 Not today, spam-dude'
exit 0
There are many mailservers out there which do not recognize a 550
in the HELO/EHLO
Marcel Stutz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi to all,
Has somewehre Infos about the Harddisk Crash on the Zebra Root Server ?
The System come up today again ?
What harddisk crash? It has an uptime of 223 days... Are you talking
about 194.42.48.126 (the TIX
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
| From 217.26.52.23:
| Trying 62.2.95.11...
| Connected to mx.hispeed.ch.
| Escape character is '^]'.
| 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Thu, 29 Jan
| 2004 15:53:30 +0100
|
| From
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
| From 217.26.52.23:
| Trying 62.2.95.11...
| Connected to mx.hispeed.ch.
| Escape character is '^]'.
| 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Thu, 29 Jan
Marcel Stutz wrote:
Hi to all, good weekend Question,
Why Access Carriers and also Transit Carriers not block all the RPC Ports on ther
Access Routers ?
Transit Carriers MUST NEVER filter anything in this way!!! Otherwise the
Internet ceases to exist. There is no agreement on what to
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Why Access Carriers and also Transit Carriers not block all the RPC Ports
on ther Access Routers ?
because some of us (swiss ISPs) think the user has the right to have full
internet access (ie not blocking anything).
Agreed. Or maybe some ISPs could do (even cheaper)
Roman Hochuli wrote:
Hello John
but does anyone have
any inside info on whether cablecom is doing anything to deal with
their customer bandwidth problems?
It happend that I've met Felix Giger last week. He's one of the Cablecom
backbone guys. As far as I am informed this is work in
Hello all,
The SWINOG-7 picture are now online on:
http://swinog.pics.omnis.ch/
Please fill in the missing names in the comments to the picture.
Thanks to Olivier Mueller for providing the ImageAlbum hosting.
--
Andre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
PS. Looking forward: When do we start implementing RMX (Reverse Mail
Exchange) records in DNS, following the IETF proposal? And then: Don't add
entries on your complete IP net block, just the designated SMTP servers
please...
RMX doesn't work in real life.
--
Andre
Markus Wild wrote:
Next use either connection limiting features (such as FreeBSD ipfw2)
Just one word of caution on this one: I've had this activated on
our mail server (IPFW2 in 4.x-STABLE) a couple of months ago, and
it lead to very odd memory corruption issues (panics that _all_
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote:
SMTP-AUTH (plain text and preferably CRAM-MD5), SMTPafterPOP or similar are
highly encouraged for any SMTP server - otherwise another dial-up IP will be
listed on the RBLs very soon and the value of your private server becomes
very limited ;-)
Again NO reason for
Christof Roduner wrote:
Since I got bounces from @nextra.ch, I thought of
checking this domain at nic.ch, and surprise surprise:
http://www.switch.ch/id/search-domain.html?dom_id=nextra.ch
I wouldn't call this domain grabbing. AFAIK, MHS took over Nextra's
nameservers and operates
Steven Glogger wrote:
does anyone does:
IP ROUTE 64.94.110.11 255.255.255.255 Null0 ?
Not very smart. It will fill your mail server queue with mails to non-
existent domains until final timeout (normally 7 days).
--
Andre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've written a patch to qmail's dns lookup routines to detect the
wildcard responses from Verisign and convert it internally back into
a NX_DOMAIN. I think the same dynamic strategy can also be used for
Postfix and Sendwhale.
-- read on here --
With Verisigns wildcard match for any
Pascal Gloor wrote:
I've written a patch to qmail's dns lookup routines to detect the
wildcard responses from Verisign and convert it internally back into
a NX_DOMAIN. I think the same dynamic strategy can also be used for
Postfix and Sendwhale.
This is good Andre, but it looks more
!
--
Andre
;-p
Cheers,
Günti
-Original Message-
From: Andre Oppermann
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26.08.2003 17:00
Subject: Re: AW: [swinog] clock summer-time on Cisco?
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Same here... (exactly the same... freaky, isn't it? ;-))
SCO MODE
Yes
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Same here... (exactly the same... freaky, isn't it? ;-))
SCO MODE
Yes, and all of you violated my exclusive copyright dating back
to ancient history! And all my trade secrets too! But I wont tell
you what exactly I own! Muaah...!!!
Fist I will sue IP-Plus and
Steven Glogger wrote:
so, who misconfigured his switch in that way?
The question is rather who connected a switch to the TIX? Is is not
allowed precisely because of this kind of problem. For example AMSIX
is very anal about this; for a reason.
IXEurope so far did not enforce the router port
I've attached an Ethereal machine to the TIX switch and watching
what is going on (broad- and multicast) for the past five hours.
Spanning-tree is pretty frustrating as when I filtered one the next
popped up from another interface. So in the end I defined some general
multicast filters in the
Here we go again. All Windows versions (NT4,W2k,W2k3) in standard
install are affected. No IIS or other packages needed. Bug is in
basic Windows functionality and fully remotely exploitable.
I recommend everybody to inform their [housing] customers immediatly
to install the hotfix right now.
ueli heuer wrote:
Hi,
At this time I see a lot of peers going up and down. Is there
something going on at the tix?
I was just checking with Michel Streiff and no physical works
have been done at the TIX Switch. I'm not sure but I don't think
that any other SW configuration work has been
A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote:
Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 09 Jul 2003:
maybe they are changing the fuse for the route server :)
Surely a highly professional organisation such as IXEurope under
the expert leadership of Mr. van de Graaff would never perform
maintenance work
Steven Glogger wrote:
so, it seems that ix europe has successfully changed their 400A fuse to a
500A.
Yep.
the had to cut down power for 5 minutes, all UPS where running normally.
while they changed the main-house-fuse the also exchanged all other fuses
with completely new ones.
so,
Roger Schmid wrote:
As i know, there are diesel-generators in
container available from KPNQwest, i think
pap aka Peter preuss should know more.
The ones he has are either too small or too big.
Even i would set even EWZ under pressure
to have the Fuses ready and be onsite in 15
minutes if
A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote:
I seem to remember Telehouse claiming it had two redundant power feeds
to the grid. Strangely I can't find any mention of this on the current
web site. Does anyone else remember this claim?
The building does have three feeds from the power grid. Two are
normally
A. Uk / dataway GmbH wrote:
Patrick Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02 Jul 2003:
Telehouse Europe, based in Geneva (Switzerland) is also following the swinog
forum. Telehouse Europe, based in Geneva (Switzerland) is a member of CIXP
*
We regret that the company
Tobias Goeller wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Like buying your software from Migrosoft... Or M-Soft... Nahh, that
sounds too much like this new ultra soft toilet paper.
well, even the worst toilet paper works in case of a power outage...
:-)
Only until you get
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Pascal Gloor wrote:
btw, our devices, and afaik Init7 onces didnt loss any power at all. Any
explanation?
I do remember that either in Q4 last year or in Q1 this year, the rack
row in 3rd floor (B.. - B20, we have B19) was equipped with a new UPS.
We had to
Andre Oppermann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our routers there are up again... but around 50% of peering partners
are still down. IxEurope is not reachable on the phone,
'anschluss ist z.Z. unterbrochen'... Looks like a heavy power
outage...
The building was down. I'm having my
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Jim,
Jim Romaguera wrote:
In a peering, both sides of the peer decide how many prefixes/ASNs they will
[... snipped]
Anyway...my 2cents worth. Cheers JIm
Full ACK. Couldn't explain better. (In your next live, you could be a
BGP teacher ;-P)
Full ACK from
Hello,
I've written a position paper on the proposed changes to the Lotterie-
gesetz. You remeber, ISPs should be liable (1 million CHF, or 1 year
in prison) if they give access to foreign and illegal online gambling
sites.
It's a little bit on short notice, but I'd like you to have read over
it
it, don't fix it.
What does Swisscom have to say about this? If I run a foreign illegal
phone-betting operation, and they 'vermitteln' access to it...
I haven't seen the their formal statement, but they don't like it
at all. They want to scrap it too.
Cheers
--
Andre
Cheers,
-John
Andre
-based-routing...
Only radius-attributes did the trick... but if you find out something else,
I'd be interested in the results, too :-)
Viktor
On Thursday 27 March 2003 01:17, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hello,
I've got a little Cisco problem. There is a 2600 router with two
BRI
Daniel Lorch wrote:
hi,
I've got quite a bit a uncommon question. I would like to attach a cellphone to
my server @ TIX, interfacing it with gnokii [1] so I can do funky stuff such as
an SMS-to-E-Mail gateway and other stuff our world really needs. I could get a
nokia cellphone with
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
I guess, that's just fine - some TX guys could use a little more (.)iq :-)
Hey, wait! What's all the fuss in the UN about? They've invaded .iq
already!
--
Andre
Cheers,
Viktor
On Friday 28 February 2003 08:40, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Pascal Gloor wrote
Pascal Gloor wrote:
AC would a presentation about Internet prefix filtering / (routing table
size reduction) be of interest for the next SWINOG ?
Sure :-)
Unfortunatly our schedule is already filled up :-/
But, one of the presentation is not 100% sure. If its discarded, you may
have an
Thomas Kernen wrote:
All,
I'm attempting to locate statistics related to usage trends of broadband
users in Switzerland to attempt to understand the average usage of bandwidth
per customer (or per 100/1000/1 customers) based on the actual available
bandwidth (512/1024/2048/etc..).
Daniel Lorch wrote:
hi,
ping swisstime.ethz.ch
PING swisstime.ee.ethz.ch (129.132.2.21): 56 data bytes
According to http://www.tix.ch/techdetails.htm there should be clock.tix.ch.
Dead as well. Maybe a new NTP-Worm spreading? huh? :)
That is exactly the thing I am supposed to bring
Thomas Kernen wrote:
I'm attempting to locate statistics related to usage trends of broadband
users in Switzerland to attempt to understand the average usage of
bandwidth
per customer (or per 100/1000/1 customers) based on the actual
available
bandwidth
Felix Rauch wrote:
While time.ethz.ch is reachble with ping, it's still not what you want
as a replacement for swisstime:
...
This means that time.ethz.ch is using swisstime.ee.ethz.ch as its own
timeserver...
For our own server we use the following time servers (from /etc/ntp.conf):
Michel Renfer wrote:
it seems, that our bbcs cer router had a crash and reload itself :-(
Sweet. I love IOS. What version do you run?
Grüsse
--
Andre
-Original Message-
From: Viktor Steinmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL
Michel Renfer wrote:
We saw a disconnect of all our bbcs customers tonight at 20:32 and it was
not caused by
our equipement. Did someone see similar behavior on this LNS?
No. Lots of sessions with more than 2 weeks.
Grüsse
--
Andre
--
[EMAIL
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Hi guys,
I would like to know how many people would not be able to join on the
following proposed dates:
- 03.04.2003
- 10.04.2004
Usually SWINOG Meeting are being held on Wednesdays!? Both of these
are Thursdays.
--
Andre
Hello all,
the Internet (actually the ISPs) are under siege again. The govt is
striking back. Not only shall we block websites any judge doesn't
like, no, we shall block access to all online gambling sites as well!
If we don't, you can choose either one million francs in fines or one
year in
FYI.
---BeginMessage---
Title: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren
Wie die meisten von Ihnen bereits informiert worden sind, wird im VIT unter der Leitung der Vorsitzenden des Arbeitskreises Delikte, Frau
Ms. Widmer writes in the last sentence that if the letter does not
give us time we shall prepare to block the websites.
What if you can't do that because your DNS software does not allow
for it? (eg. DJBDNS) And you don't have a proxy?
I will write back excatly that. In addition to the letter
On Monday 16 December 2002 17:24, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Ms. Widmer writes in the last sentence that if the letter does not
give us time we shall prepare to block the websites.
What if you can't do that because your DNS software does not allow
for it? (eg. DJBDNS) And you don't have a proxy
Andre Oppermann wrote:
I'm faxing it to my combox at the moment. Then I'll get a PDF
back via Email. Cool combox.
Will post the PDF.
Here it is:
http://www.nrg4u.com/abuse/canton-de-vaud.pdf
--
Andre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http
Steven Glogger wrote:
I have an unofficial answer from a person from DBA/UVEK which told me that
we may trash this order :-P
:)) it seems that the DBA/UVEK is a little bit confused. the should have at
least on techie there :) andré? what about a 10% job @UVEK? *grin*
Many thanks for the
Alexander Gall wrote:
Hello André
Hoi Alex,
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:47:39 +0100, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aloa!
The TIX now supports IPv6 on it's peering mesh. I've simply assigned
an IPv6 address to all current peers, whether you'll use it or not.
Great
Aloa!
The TIX now supports IPv6 on it's peering mesh. I've simply assigned
an IPv6 address to all current peers, whether you'll use it or not.
The addressing scheme is pretty simple:
2001:7f8:c:8235:[your TIX IPv4 address with colons here]/112
with a prefixlength of /112.
in the end it
Hello all,
I'm looking for used/old/decommissioned telecoms equipement to build
a cross-vendor OpenLAB.
All kinds of vendors, systems and ages are interesting:
Cisco Routers/Switches/whatever
Ascom Modems/Mux/whatever
Nortel SDH/Routers/Switches/whatever
Newbridge Modems/Mux/whatever
Dear all,
I've written a big letter in german for the FMG revision based on
what I posted here in this group a couple of days ago. Unfortunately
time was precious over the weekend and it took me about 8 hours today
to write it to the extent you see now. So I could finish the text only
an hour
Hello all,
Although SWINOG is not political there are certain aspects in law-
making that have clearly severe technological consequences to us and
our businesses and do not have a direct question/motivation out of
direct policy making by parties.
Obeying that I think the SWINOG group should
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Obeying that I think the SWINOG group should send a response to the
FMG revision targeting very specifially these points with clear
technical background:
[...]
I second... but not it comes... shouldnt we, at least, create a SwiNOG
Hello all,
I had to replace one Gigabit card one the Foundry TIX switch tonight.
Should not have any impact... but it did. Appearently there was a bug
in the Foundry BigIron firmware and the Management card did a reload
and caused a couple of seconds interruption of the forwarding engine.
Hello all,
please stop any filtering in the IP backbones! It wreks havroc the
whole thing. If you do any filtering, then do it on the access network
gateways to the backbone!
I'm getting really pissed that more and more upstreams are filtering
their entire backbones without telling anyone (not
Thomas Kernen wrote:
Andre
I take it you mean that RFC1918 or other bogons that are not assigned by
IANA to any registry are okay to filter vs assigned/allocated IP space
to/from the registeries should not be filtered.
Yes, exactly.
In my opinion also the aggregating filtering on min
Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Hi all
Who else got this?
Everyone referenced in an AS object in the RIPE table?
--
Andre
F.
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ccgnt03.lambdanet.net (LNC-H.de.lambdanet.net [217.71.108.206])
by mx1.init7.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
and Internet Users!
Have a nice weekend
--
Andre Oppermann
TIX Project Manager
IXEurope Telehouse Facilities AG
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Pascal Gloor wrote:
Hi ppl,
AS8220 and AS8938 got their BGP session to the route-viewer down since over
2 weeks now.
AS8938 (Energis) Network has been disintegrated (which is a nicer
word for shutdown) two weeks ago. They unfortunatly wont come back.
--
Andre
AS15407 is still sending
Michel Renfer wrote:
Hi All
It is planed to go drinking a beer after swinog-3. :)
- Who will come?
- Who is interested to go eating after the apèro?
- Do we find a sponsor for the beer(s) ? :)
Yes, IXEurope Telehouse Zürich will sponsor Beer/Drinks like at
swinog-3.
Michel, do you
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
