Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello Stuart, > Another issue. > > I keep two complete copies of the TB mailing lists. One is a POP > account and the other is an IMAP account. (I do this for testing > purposes). The POP account kept the whole thread together despite my > missing message. The IMAP account w

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, >> A! That may be the reason, that your message was >> just sent to MFPA and he replied to the list. > > Yes. I just thought my filters or templates were playing up, and > adjusted the To adress of my replies manually. OK, that explains it. At first I thought it was my filters

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday 17 November 2013 at 6:45:33 PM, in , MAU wrote: > A! That may be the reason, that your message was > just sent to MFPA and he replied to the list. Yes. I just thought my filters or templates were playing up, and adjusted the To adress of my replies manually. -- Best rega

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread Cafe Noir
messages from him in this list lately, and more M>> specifically in this thread. > Don't know if you are going to see this, but as you mentioned I can't see the > e-mail reply I originally sent. I wonder if it just went to MFPA and was not > sent to the list. Just wante

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread scuddy
ecifically in this thread. smn> Don't know if you are going to see this, but as you mentioned I can't see the smn> e-mail reply I originally sent. I wonder if it just went to MFPA and was not smn> sent to the list. Another issue. I keep two complete copies of the TB mailing

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread MAU
Hello Stuart, > Don't know if you are going to see this, but as you mentioned I can't see the > e-mail reply I originally sent. I wonder if it just went to MFPA and was not > sent to the list. A! That may be the reason, that your message was just sent to MFPA and he replied to the list. --

Re: Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread scuddy
Hello MAU, A reminder of what MAU typed on: Sunday, November 17, 2013 at 19:09:02 GMT +0100 M> Something weird is happening. You seem to reply to Stuart Cuddy and yet M> I have not received any messages from him in this list lately, and more M> specifically in this thread. Don'

Missing messages in this thread (WAS: Re: The Bat! Version 6.0.0)

2013-11-17 Thread MAU
https://bt.ritlabs.com/ Something weird is happening. You seem to reply to Stuart Cuddy and yet I have not received any messages from him in this list lately, and more specifically in this thread. Same thing happens with your in which you seem to reply to Roger Philips and I have not received/se

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Customizing mail headers)

2011-03-30 Thread Roelof Otten
ing replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Terry. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "V

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-24 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello Doug, On Thursday, March 19, 2009, you wrote: DH> I had the same problem you describe, and the "New Threads" option fixed it. DH> It would be nice if it had a more descriptive label... It's fixed... I needed to add a new folder to my virtual folder and it started working properly! I've no

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-19 Thread Doug Higby
gt; (sort by create date, ascending) of my message list. > I found this item: > https://ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4&TID=3376&ACTION=TOPIC_SUBSCRIBE > And have checked "'sort by created' with the option 'new thread > sorting' enabled" but still

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-07 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello, On Friday, March 6, 2009, you wrote: >> I guess this is just a limitation of virtual folders? M> Dunno. I rarely use them - never really explored them as incoming M> filters and real folders do what I want. Ah, I was a doubter once, but now I have several that I'd be lost without: 1. La

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-06 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 4 March 2009 at 5:02:13 PM, in , Nick Dutton wrote: > I guess this is just a limitation of virtual folders? Dunno. I rarely use them - never really explored them as incoming filters and real folders do what I want. > Along with going stale Even with "auto refresh" selected?

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-04 Thread Nick Dutton
376&ACTION=TOPIC_SUBSCRIBE >> And have checked "'sort by created' with the option >> 'new thread sorting' enabled" but still new messages >> for old threads appear way down(or up in my case) the >> list, where the original message came in. >

Re: Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-03 Thread MFPA
p?FID=4&TID=3376&ACTION=TOPIC_SUBSCRIBE > And have checked "'sort by created' with the option > 'new thread sorting' enabled" but still new messages > for old threads appear way down(or up in my case) the > list, where the original message came in. > Ca

Sorting by thread activity

2009-03-03 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello, I'm trying to get threads with recent activity to show as the bottom (sort by create date, ascending) of my message list. I found this item: https://ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4&TID=3376&ACTION=TOPIC_SUBSCRIBE And have checked "'sort by created' with th

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-02-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:15:26 +0100 GMT (10/01/2009, 08:15 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: M> But neither of them is perfect. I'll give you more details M> tomorrow, it's past 2 AM and I'd like to get some sleep now. Sleep is not approved, the internet is suspended pending your detailled explan

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-13 Thread MFPA
Hi On Monday 12 January 2009 at 11:43:53 AM, in , MAU wrote: > See my note dated 11-may-2006 in this wish list item: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542 Duly supported, having appreciated a similar feature previously in newsreader applications in the past and currently reading sever

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-12 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, > Neat. > > From your previous post, I wondered if TB! had an "Ignore" function I > had not discovered - but you have implemented your own (-: See my note dated 11-may-2006 in this wish list item: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El E

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-11 Thread MFPA
the message is > marked as read and assigned to my Ignored colour group. I see. > So, when I want to ignore a thread (or branch) I right > click on the first message and select Specials/Watch > replies in../Ignore and every time I I get new > messages that belong to this thre

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-10 Thread Jens Franik
Samstag, 10. Januar 2009 at 16:27, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Why is that? (Just asking.) Flame-wars are the most entertaining part > of the internet! IMHO, of course, but the popcorn industry depends on > it. Well :-) Sometimes i read them as well, but the main time i have a lot of work, which

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:29:35 +0100 GMT (09/01/2009, 18:29 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: >> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read? JF> I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a JF> Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-10 Thread MAU
age list and 'Watch replies in..' an already created watch folder. What this does is create and internal (and hidden) list of MIDs associated to the selected watch folder, so that any new message received that includes one of those MIDs in the References header will be displayed in the watc

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, >> I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or >> newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any >> future messages will not bother me. > > How do you achieve that and what does it do? I use two different ways, one with and 'Ignore' filter and th

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, >> I have never seen such a behaviour. > > Well it has always been the behaviour I have experienced in TB! until > very recently. After reading your I think you should redefine what you mean by 'always' and 'recently'. ;-) >> I think you are complicating things here with colour gro

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 12:48:00 AM, in , MFPA wrote: > I think this changed when I upgraded from v4.0.32.4 to > v4.0.38 but it may have been a slightly earlier > upgrade. It was indeed a "slightly" earlier upgrade (-; I have just tested with some old versions and found the behaviour I

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 1:39:58 AM, in , Rick wrote: > Are we perhaps talking about in a collapsed tree > branch? If so then I never noticed. It would have to > highlight to let you know there was an unread message > in the branch (?) No we are not, although a collapsed branch is still

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 8:44:05 AM, in , Jens Franik wrote: > Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote: >> If not read but just marked as read they are red not >> bold. > How do you manage to do that? I thought "read" as > opened is the same as "read" by CTRL-M. I usually read

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:58:33 AM, in , Jens Franik wrote: > maybe a colorgroup stands for "read that later", or something we > will never guess without explanation, so let us drink some coffe > first... > :batcoffee: Aw! I missed the coffee. It has grown to mean something like "di

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:49:56 AM, in , MAU wrote: > I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or > newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any > future messages will not bother me. How do you achieve that and what does it do? > I may be wron

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:29:35 AM, in , Jens Franik wrote: > Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote: >> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you >> have NOT read? > I do this too, because i look over the subjects > and if it is a Flame-War i do not read

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MFPA
. It also allows me to distinguish between a message I have never read and one I have marked as unread because I need to attend to it some other time non-urgently, for example. (see also description below) > Now, about threads. A collapsed thread (or thread > branch) containing 'Unread'

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 12:49, MAU wrote: >>> If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold. >> >> This is a key issue I think. Why and how do you 'mark as read' a >> message that you have NOT read? > I may be wrong but I think MFPA is trying to make a distinction between > messag

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MAU
Hello Jens, >> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read? > > I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a > Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and > CTRL-M it all read without reading it. Of course, we all do that

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote: > Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read? I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and CTRL-M it all read without reading it.

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, > It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up > the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message > didn't change. I have never seen such a behaviour. The default behaviour, which has always (or AFAIR) been like that, is t

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-09 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote: > If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold. How do you manage to do that? I thought "read" as opened is the same as "read" by CTRL-M. -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.d

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-08 Thread Rick
> Hello MFPA, > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT), > MFPA wrote: >>> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread. M>> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up M>> the thread. If the threa

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MFPA, On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: >> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread. M> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up M> the thread. If the thread branched, those not abov

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-08 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:39 PM, in , Rick wrote: > I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread. It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message didn't change. My de

Re: New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-08 Thread Rick
> Hi > A new message at the bottom of a thread previously caused all messages > above it in the thread to show as "unread". > I'm not sure when this was changed but it no longer does and I don't > like the new way. > How do I revert to the previous behavio

New message at bottom of thread no longer makes messages above it appear "unread"

2009-01-08 Thread MFPA
Hi A new message at the bottom of a thread previously caused all messages above it in the thread to show as "unread". I'm not sure when this was changed but it no longer does and I don't like the new way. How do I revert to the previous behaviour? I have not managed to find

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: PDA Support ?)

2008-12-29 Thread Roelof Otten
reply. Please don't feel singled out Ed. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference" to see where it ended up.

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Speaking of signatures)

2008-08-26 Thread Roelof Otten
ll readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Chrille. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Ba

New thread sorting: what's wrong with it? (repost from tbbeta)

2008-08-06 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Tbudl, Maybe the beta list was the wrong place to post this in the first step, because it might not be a beta issue...so I try and repost it here. I have this problem: > http://www.nachbild.de/temp/tb_new_thread_sorting.png > I have this list sorted by creation date, with "

WAS: Shortcut for thread

2008-03-12 Thread Luc
Good evening list, Found it: shortcuts ---> Main form ---> message list pop-up menu -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the be

Shortcut for thread

2008-03-12 Thread Luc
Good evening list, I used to have 2 shortcuts set up for parking and unparking threads (p & u). Somehow i've lost them. I know i need to assign them in Toolbars ---> Customise but once there i'm at a loss. Anybody knows exactly where i need to assign them? I tried several places but the

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: requires installation CD of Office 2003)

2007-09-27 Thread Roelof Otten
may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out pkr. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference"

Re[2]: Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Editors - external?)

2006-12-14 Thread Robert Bull
Hello, Alexander; Sunday, December 10, 2006, 9:16:43 PM, you wrote: > I am not the person you addressed with your reply, but I'd like to > explain this anyway, hoping that you spread the word that using the > reply function when you actually want to write a new message is not a > good idea. :-)

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Editors - external?)

2006-12-06 Thread Roelof Otten
if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Robert. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Question about The bat)

2006-10-16 Thread Roelof Otten
n't feel singled out Christian. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference" to see where it ended up. The

Re[2]: Mod: Reply for new thread

2006-10-04 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 5:29:35 PM, you wrote: > Excellent. Thank you for making the effort. Much appreciated. No problem. -- Best regards, Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' in

Re: Mod: Reply for new thread

2006-10-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Graham, @4-Oct-2006, 16:30 Graham Smith [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... >> This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. GS> Now I am feeling singled out :-) Yes ... sorry about that! GS> However, I have changed the reply template for The Bat! mailing list

Re[2]: Mod: Reply for new thread

2006-10-04 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 4:14:26 PM, you wrote: > Ooops! Sorry to have to do this GS>> I don't feel singled out, and thanks for pointing it out. I see my GS>> message has indeed ended up in a strange place. > ... and ... > This posting violated the list rules regarding top

Re: Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Sending mail from second account)

2006-10-04 Thread Graham Smith
d one called GS>> BathSpa. > > Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not > just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have > instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Graham. > )<)))'> > Please don

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Sending mail from second account)

2006-10-04 Thread Roelof Otten
ed to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Graham. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View

OT: Viewing TBUDL threadless [was Re: Collapse thread icon?]

2006-09-10 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Sunday, September 10, 2006, 2:13 AM, you wrote: >> I view these mailing lists unthreaded, sorted chronologically > Blasphemy!!! > ;-) :rofl2: Eccentric Mary she was knowed as in them days! (From a "Fibber McGee and Molly" monologue, on the old U.S. radio show) I've outl

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-10 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else, on 09-Sep-2006 at 17:30 you (Mary Bull) wrote: > I view these mailing lists unthreaded, sorted chronologically Blasphemy!!! ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill. Check 3 friends. If th

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > Keep us posted on how you're getting along, please. I'll pay any trout > or horse fines. :) I will :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.85.03 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' inf

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > I'm sending you a virtual beer to comfort you. Nice and cold! Thanks :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.85.03 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silversto

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Stuart, > Ahh. And how is Rapunzel (aka Charlene)? Did you slay the dragon? Oh, she's fine and beautiful as usual. And there was no need to slay the dragon, I challenged him to configure a few simple shortcuts with TB's Customiser and he just dropped dead ;) > Actually I think we need to

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 09, 2006, 11:25 AM, you wrote: >> Miguel, I've been reading your mails that mention this. Best wishes >> for a speedy and reasonably comfortable--and yes, complete--recovery. > Thanks Mary. I guess everything will be fine, but I have to be patient > because I

Re[2]: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello MAU, Saturday, September 9, 2006, 11:20:57 AM, you wrote: > Yes, there is a good story. I was bitten by a dragon when trying to save > my beloved blue eyed and long-haired princess (Charlene?) from him. > That's the true story, but some malicious people are saying that my > tendon broke when

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 09, 2006, 11:20 AM, you wrote: >> Is there at least a good story? Not injured in a tomato slinging match >> was it? > Yes, there is a good story. I was bitten by a dragon when trying to save > my beloved blue eyed and long-haired princess (Charlene?) from him

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > Miguel, I've been reading your mails that mention this. Best wishes > for a speedy and reasonably comfortable--and yes, complete--recovery. Thanks Mary. I guess everything will be fine, but I have to be patient because I will need to wear a cast for at least 4 more weeks and then s

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Stuart, >> And it is too bad this can't be done. I injured my left arm and I will >> be 'one handed' for 4-5 weeks ... > > Is there at least a good story? Not injured in a tomato slinging match > was it? Yes, there is a good story. I was bitten by a dragon when trying to save my belove

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 09, 2006, 10:08 AM, you wrote: >> Is there any way to set up an icon on my toolbar or main menu that >> will collapse all threads in a folder. I don't see >> one but I thought maybe I could assign on to the shortcut key sequence. > I had not used it in quite

Re[2]: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello MAU, Saturday, September 9, 2006, 10:08:24 AM, you wrote: > And it is too bad this can't be done. I injured my left arm and I will > be 'one handed' for 4-5 weeks ... Is there at least a good story? Not injured in a tomato slinging match was it? -- Stuartm

Re: Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Larry, > Is there any way to set up an icon on my toolbar or main menu that > will collapse all threads in a folder. I don't see > one but I thought maybe I could assign on to the shortcut key sequence. I had not used it in quite a while but I have taken a look at the 'powerful' (and far

Collapse thread icon?

2006-09-06 Thread Larry Wing
Is there any way to set up an icon on my toolbar or main menu that will collapse all threads in a folder. I don't see one but I thought maybe I could assign on to the shortcut key sequence. Thanks, Larry -- TheBat! 3.85.01 Windows XP Curren

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: plain avnilla interface?)

2006-04-26 Thread Roelof Otten
n't feel singled out Stephen. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference" to see where it ended up. The resul

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo BJH, On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:40:41 +GMT (14-2-2006, 12:40 +0100, where I live), you wrote: B> I've installed all my quick templates but can't find the default templates. They're stored in the accunt.cfn with the account settings. -- Groetjes, Roelof What youth deemed crystal, age fin

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-14 Thread Barry
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:23:51 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote: > Folders (and their templates) are stored in account.flb (.efb for > OTFE) Each account has its own file, common folders are stored in the > file in the mail directory. > Quick templates are stored in account.qtn (.etn for OTFE) each accoun

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo BJH, On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:26:56 +GMT (14-2-2006, 10:26 +0100, where I live), you wrote: B> Can anyone help with TB! file names and locations? Everything is located in the mail directory, It depends a bit on your setup where that is located. The mail directory has a directory for ever

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-14 Thread Barry
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:33:52 +, Barry wrote: > OK, I took a 'sledgehammer' to it and did a clean install. I'm slowly > building message bases back together but I could do with some help with > regard to file names and locations for things like quick templates, etc. so > I can retrieve them ind

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-13 Thread Barry
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:31:32 +, BJH wrote: > What more can I do? OK, I took a 'sledgehammer' to it and did a clean install. I'm slowly building message bases back together but I could do with some help with regard to file names and locations for things like quick templates, etc. so I can retr

Re: Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-13 Thread Barry
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:31:32 +, BJH wrote: > Hi > > Suddendly my installation of TheBat! has gone pear shaped! > > I keep getting the following error: > > "Thread creation error: Not enough storage is available to process > this command" > > Eh?

Thread Creation Error?

2006-02-10 Thread BJH
Hi Suddendly my installation of TheBat! has gone pear shaped! I keep getting the following error: "Thread creation error: Not enough storage is available to process this command" Eh? The error seems to occur whenever a folder is accessed. How many Gigabytes does it need? I'v

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses)

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
se don't feel singled out Vernon. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference" to see where it ended up. The

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: ssl)

2005-12-08 Thread Roelof Otten
ust to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Lou. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail clie

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-21 Thread Cory
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:09:00 +0200, Martin Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is this the same for you other users, too? Yep, and never before noticed this. Maybe because I use L/R arrow to close/open threads. don't know about multi-level threads, haven't got any that I know of. -- Happy fla

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-19 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Myself, > o Ctrl+(Shift)+Plus/Minus = open/close all the branches of the current > thread in a folder > This shortcut does not seem to work on my german keyboard. I want to > change it, but can't find it in the customize dialog. After a lot of

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-19 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Cory, > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:33:46 +0200, Martin Schuster > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>My Keyboard does not contain the numeric keys, only as additional >>alt-keys on letter keys, like in a notebook. If I activate those it >>still doesn't work :-( > You then may have a Fn key as on mos

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-19 Thread Cory
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:33:46 +0200, Martin Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My Keyboard does not contain the numeric keys, only as additional >alt-keys on letter keys, like in a notebook. If I activate those it >still doesn't work :-( You then may have a Fn key as on most laptops? Enable NumL

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-18 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Peter, > Hi Martin, > on Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:40:15 +0200GMT (18.10.2005, 12:40 +0200GMT here), > you wrote: MS>> o Ctrl+(Shift)+Plus/Minus = open/close all the branches of the current MS>> thread in a folder MS>> This shortcut

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tom, On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:35:09 -0700 GMT (30/09/2005, 12:35 +0700 GMT), Tom Plunket wrote: TP> If only I had an internet connection as I write this. I wonder how your message ended up in my Inbox. sncr ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Reality is a crutch for people who can't face drugs. Mess

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-18 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Martin, on Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:40:15 +0200GMT (18.10.2005, 12:40 +0200GMT here), you wrote: MS> o Ctrl+(Shift)+Plus/Minus = open/close all the branches of the current MS> thread in a folder MS> This shortcut does not seem to work on my german keyboard.

Re[2]: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-18 Thread The Janitor
18 October 2005 - 16:09 Hello Fredrik, Tuesday, October 18, 2005, 12:16:37 PM, you wrote: FB> I think that it works, and as I developer I know that this kind of FB> dialogs is not easy to make, and making them understandable is FB> even harder. I think it doesn't work; like Martin I find

Re: Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-18 Thread Fredrik Bergström
ace where I can set the following shortcut (quote from a > keyboard shortcut file I found on the net): > o Ctrl+(Shift)+Plus/Minus = open/close all the branches of the current > thread in a folder > This shortcut does not seem to work on my german keyboard.

Set new keyboard shortcut for "open/close thread"

2005-10-18 Thread Martin Schuster
shortcut (quote from a keyboard shortcut file I found on the net): o Ctrl+(Shift)+Plus/Minus = open/close all the branches of the current thread in a folder This shortcut does not seem to work on my german keyboard. I want to change it, but can't find it in the cust

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: SSL Support)

2005-10-12 Thread Roelof Otten
se don't feel singled out kattack. )<)))'> Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See "View | View threads by | Reference" to see where it ended up. The

Re[2]: Thread by Sender

2005-09-30 Thread Fredrik Bergström
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:35:09 -0700 GMT, Tom wrote: >> As you can se all the mails from each sender is grouped but I will not >> see the Subject or Received date of the last e-mail without expanding >> each thread. > in your view mode setup do you have "group by date&quo

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-29 Thread Tom Plunket
ived date of the last e-mail without expanding > each thread. To answer your actual question without getting into the Asperger- fueled "why would you let anything stay in your inbox" not-question, in your view mode setup do you have "group by date" checked, by any chance?

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-21 Thread Chris
Fredrik Bergström @ 9/21/2005 11:20:04 AM "Thread by Sender" > How do everybody else look at the mails in their Inbox? Personally, for non-mailing list messages, I keep everything in the correct folder (making excessive use of outgoing filter) and thread by references sorting by

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-21 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Fredrik Bergström & everyone else, on 21-Sep-2005 at 18:20 you (Fredrik Bergström) wrote: > How do everybody else look at the mails in their Inbox? Mails seldomly reside in the inbox. Most are filtered right away, Mailinglists etc. - the private conversation is filtered with a "known" fi

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Fredrik, On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:20:04 +0200GMT (21-9-2005, 18:20 +0200, where I live), you wrote: FB> Yes, I suppose that this is the case. Is there any way to view the FB> messages as I would like to view them? I don't think so. FB> How do everybody else look at the mails in their

Re[2]: Thread by Sender

2005-09-21 Thread Fredrik Bergström
ox.png >> That looks indeed wrong to me. Not as it should. > It is the new look of thread-by-from in v3... Yes, I suppose that this is the case. Is there any way to view the messages as I would like to view them? How do everybody else look at the mails in their Inbox? -- /Fredri

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-21 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else, on 21-Sep-2005 at 03:01 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: FB>> Just to clarify what I mean with empty lines I took this image: FB>> http://holly.ko2000.nu/fredsinbox.png > That looks indeed wrong to me. Not as it should. It is the new loo

Re: Thread by Sender

2005-09-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Fredrik, On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:09:27 +0200 GMT (20/09/2005, 23:09 +0700 GMT), Fredrik Bergström wrote: FB> Just to clarify what I mean with empty lines I took this image: FB> http://holly.ko2000.nu/fredsinbox.png That looks indeed wrong to me. Not as it should. I'll try it later, have to

Re[2]: Thread by Sender

2005-09-20 Thread Fredrik Bergström
se can help better. Just to clarify what I mean with empty lines I took this image: http://holly.ko2000.nu/fredsinbox.png As you can se all the mails from each sender is grouped but I will not see the Subject or Received date of the last e-mail without expanding each thread. Sorting and everything

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >