Hi all,
I was talking with a friend about Bayesian mail filters, which apparently learn
to sort one's mail by being given examples. Is anyone using such a filter with
TheBat!? Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
He who will not apply new remedies must
Ron,
On 16-12-2002 13:08, you [R] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
R I was talking with a friend about Bayesian mail filters, which
R apparently learn to sort one's mail by being given examples. Is
R anyone using such a filter with TheBat!? Any advice will be
R app
Hello Ron,
I was talking with a friend about Bayesian mail filters, which apparently learn
to sort one's mail by being given examples. Is anyone using such a filter with
TheBat!? Any advice will be appreciated.
See a thread with Subject: [SOT] The best filter for SPAM started
yesterday
Maybe others have mentioned this idea: let the same filter apply to
both Inbox and Outbox so that I don't have to keep defining the same
filter twice, once for recipient and once for sender.
Ideally, filters should not be associated with Inbox, Outbox, Sent
Mail, or any other default folder
.
Actually, I always use Presence in Kludges in order to cover both
recipient and sender. What I still have to do is create two filters,
one for incoming and one for outgoing mail.
I therefore suggested repeatedly that these filter functions
(incoming, outgoing, read, replied) should not be seperated
HI!
tbudl:
I accidently deleted a set of office filters for sorting incoming
mail. (I thought I was deleting just one rule but ended up deleting
the entire set.)
Is there anyway to recover the deleted set? (I had about 40+ spam
filters in there and I don't really want to recreate them from
Hello Carter Thomas,
On or about Wednesday, November 27, 2002 at 07:56:28GMT -0800
(which was 10:56 AM in the tropics where I live) Carter Thomas
wrote;
CT I accidently deleted a set of office filters for sorting incoming
CT mail. (I thought I was deleting just one rule but ended up deleting
CT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Carter,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:56:28 -0800 your time, you said:
CT Is there anyway to recover the deleted set? (I had about 40+ spam
CT filters in there and I don't really want to recreate them from scratch.)
Did you back up your TB
Is there anyway to recover the deleted set? (I had about 40+ spam
CT filters in there and I don't really want to recreate them from scratch.)
Did you back up your TB! message base folder by any chance? That'll be your
only route now! :(
- --
Slán,
Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk
Hello Mike,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:38:03 -0700 GMT (10/11/02, 23:38 +0700 GMT),
Mike wrote:
Can anyone imagine whether the fields in the filter add section
accept wild cards?
You can use wild cards if you enable Regular Expressions in the
Advanced tab of the sorting Office.
IN addition to
be childs play and also, how a quick key can run all the filters
CW for me (Re-Filter Folder).
View/Edit Shortcuts/Folder and click on Re-filter.
CW Saves going through the menus and selecting
CW the 'Read' filter aswell.
I don't know how to do that. If the checkboxes are not set right, you
have
Hi Adam,
On Friday, October 25, 2002 14:26 your local time, which was 09:56 my
local time, Adam Adam [A] wrote;
CW It's working fine now! Just need to work on the delete filter which
CW should be childs play and also, how a quick key can run all the
CW filters for me (Re-Filter Folder).
A View
Hello Chris,
Friday, October 25, 2002, 2:50:47 PM, you wrote:
CW I've set up a nice little hot-key through PowerPro to execute what I
CW require. It goes through the menus and selects the read filters aswell
Oh, did you? That would sound a little tricky.
And you would presume some first state
Good evening Chris,
It was foretold that on 24-10-2002 12:52:32 GMT-0700 (which was
21:52:32 where I live) Chris Weaven would mumble:
snipped a bit
CW How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a
CW time?
Can't help you out on that because i only use my
on
L the folder and add your filter. You now created a read filter.
I've got a few in there that I've now turned to manual.
How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a
time?
Cheers,
Chris.
--
E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked
Good evening Chris,
It was foretold that on 24-10-2002 10:49:39 GMT-0700 (which was
19:49:39 where I live) Chris Weaven would mumble:
snipped a bit
JN The read/unread switch will not be there, because you address that
JN in the type of filter you use. For example, a read filter will,
JN
mail.
How is this done?
JN Instead of manual filters, consider making more extensive use of
JN read filters. Instead of flagging messages that you want to
JN delete and then filtering around them and then deleting them, just
JN delete them after they're read, if you are going to read them, or
JN
be sure that you also set your account options not to mark
a message as read when it is still in the preview pane.
FWIW, people's preferences are different, but I don't really think
that the setup you described is the most elegant way to do what you
want. Instead of manual filters, consider making
Hello Chris,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, 3:52:32 PM, you wrote:
CW I've got a few in there that I've now turned to manual.
CW How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a
CW time?
I think this is what you are looking for:
You can do this on a per folder basis
messages are to be filtered to their respective folders
6. All this to be run manually from one hot-key
I can work on the individual mail filters to each folder, but want to
know how to trigger a selection of filters together.
Any mails regarding TBOT, TBUDL and TBTECH will automatically go
Hi Patrick,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002 16:49 your local time, which was 13:49 my
local time, Patrick G. [PG] wrote;
CW How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a
CW time?
PG You can do this on a per folder basis by right clicking the folder
PG select Re-filter
Hi,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002 14:25 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW]
wrote;
CW I've added a host of names into the alternative and when i manually
CW run the filter, nothing happens?
Forgot to add, these filters were working when set to automatic.
Chris.
--
E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED
in the bottom of
CW the 'Rule' tab in filters compared to adding addresses in
CW 'Alternatives'?
My understanding of this is adding under filter sets under the rules
tab treats them as boolean 'AND' where the alternatives tab is
treated as 'OR'
CW I've added a host of names into the alternative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:13314440474.20021024142518;Surfcity.net,
Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:'
CW Okay, what's the difference between adding addresses in the
CW bottom of the 'Rule' tab in filters
These are 'and' strings meaning that all the strings and their
conditions
Hi Allie,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002 17:38 your local time, which was 15:38 my
local time, Allie Martin wrote;
CW I've added a host of names into the alternative and when i manually
CW run the filter, nothing happens?
We need to know more on what you're trying to do and what you've
done so
, but as mentioned, even when
CW deleting, it would still filter to the family folder. I've now
CW set this filter to manual and try to run it, but it does nothing
CW :-( I've a few others that were working as automatic, but now
CW manual, don't do anything?
How did you set the filters to manual?
The options Rule
, even when
CW deleting, it would still filter to the family folder. I've now
CW set this filter to manual and try to run it, but it does nothing
CW :-( I've a few others that were working as automatic, but now
CW manual, don't do anything?
How did you set the filters to manual?
The options Rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:13820928243.20021024161326;Surfcity.net,
Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:'
CW It's working fine now! Just need to work on the delete filter
CW which should be childs play and also, how a quick key can run
CW all the filters for me (Re-Filter Folder
Hello Chris,
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 at 08:56:56 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
CW I hope that makes sense to everyone and that it's possible and
CW someone can help me complete this mission :-)
I read the entire thread, but just picked this one to reply to. Have
you read:
Hello Scott,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 at 13:16:09 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
SM What's wrong with doing it the way you do it now, mark, copy,
SM paste it to the filter list. I mean, how often do you change your
SM filters? It's not like you do it every day or whatever.
In the context of grabbing
to
export in some fashion some or even all the filters in an account
which could be e-mailed or such to another machine. I would just
prefer to have some level of interactivity in determining which of the
(such as in my case 50+ filters) to import.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator
of Alists message where you might be the recipient of
LG maybe 20 to 30 filters, that's a lot of geek read to decide if it's a
LG filter you want to install.
Yes, imagine a filter trojan that just deletes your email for you, all
because you imported someone else's filters without looking at them.
I'd
Hello alists,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 at 06:47:55 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
awc when TB receives it, it would automatically cause the new filter
awc be loaded to the receiving machine.
Don't know about that part. I'd hate to get an e-mail from a spammer
that modifies my filters to allow his SPAM
Hi, Leif!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 11:35:32 AM, you wrote:
awc when TB receives it, it would automatically cause the new filter
awc be loaded to the receiving machine.
LG Don't know about that part. I'd hate to get an e-mail from a spammer
LG that modifies my filters to allow his SPAM to get
Hello Scott,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 11:16:09 AM, you wrote:
SM What's wrong with doing it the way you do it now, mark, copy, paste it
SM to the filter list. I mean, how often do you change your filters? It's
SM not like you do it every day or whatever.
as new junk mail comes in i'm
Hello Leif,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 9:35:32 AM, you wrote:
LG Don't know about that part. I'd hate to get an e-mail from a
LG spammer that modifies my filters to allow his SPAM to get
LG through. Maybe a parser that would pop up a dialog box so
LG that you can put a checkbox next to each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Mcnay [SM] wrote:'
SM What's wrong with doing it the way you do it now, mark, copy,
SM paste it to the filter list. I mean, how often do you change
SM your filters? It's not like you do it e
Hi, alists!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:37:33 PM, you wrote:
awc as new junk mail comes in i'm always adding filters
Every day?
Mostly I add whitelist filters maybe one a week, and even then, with
the $KNOWN$ filter, that catches most of everything already. Most of
my new filters
Hello alists,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:40:05 -0700 GMT (14/10/02, 01:40 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awc [...] .. i'd like to have TB! installed on all the machines, and
awc be able to easily share my filters. plus some are pretty
awc complicated to set up... and maintain
Hi, Allie!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:49:27 PM, you wrote:
ACM I'd be happy with the current method if I could select and copy more
ACM than a single filter at a time. Currently, I have to copy and paste
Oh, I'm not arguaing about that. I'm surprised that that ability wasn't added
long ago.
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 11:54:22 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello alists,
TF On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:40:05 -0700 GMT (14/10/02, 01:40 +0700 GMT),
TF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF awc [...] .. i'd like to have TB! installed on all the machines, and
TF awc be able to easily share my filters
Hello Scott,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 11:52:27 AM, you wrote:
SM Mostly I add whitelist filters maybe one a week, and even then, with
SM the $KNOWN$ filter, that catches most of everything already. Most of
SM my new filters are for ill-behaved non-standard lists.
i don't know what
Hi Scott,
On Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:52 PM, you put forth, in part, about Setting Global
Account Settings sharing filters across computers:
awc as new junk mail comes in i'm always adding filters
S Every day?
S Mostly I add whitelist filters maybe one a week, and even
..plus i have a
awc lot of distribution lists.. and other net business.. i just added
awc 2 filters today for mailings i want to sort into different
awc folders. i wish i had the option to bounce
awc it! that would be cool!!
You should have a $KNOWN$ filter in your list of filters; it catches
Hello Scott,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 12:27:40 PM, you wrote:
SM You should have a $KNOWN$ filter in your list of filters; it catches
SM emails that are from email addresses that are in your address book.
SM That's an example of a whitelist; it identifies emails that you want,
SM
Scott,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 12:27:40 PM, you wrote:
SM You should have a $KNOWN$ filter in your list of filters; it catches
SM emails that are from email addresses that are in your address book.
SM That's an example of a whitelist; it identifies emails that you want,
SM not emails
Hello Dave,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:04:19 PM, you wrote:
DC You can use the same idea for creating a blacklist.
DC I created a separate address book, called killfile, and discard all mail
DC from anyone that is KNOWN in that address book.
what i've found is that the messages are from tons
Hi, Laura!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 3:09:28 PM, you wrote:
DC I created a separate address book, called killfile, and discard all mail
DC from anyone that is KNOWN in that address book.
awc what i've found is that the messages are from tons of different
awc sources.. often the same message..
Hello Scott,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:28:05 PM, you wrote:
Unless you have
SM more than several dozen spams coming in daily, I'd say
that that's SM probably adequate.
I get 150 or so per day that are junk! often more...
which is why I need to get some easy way to handle it!
thanks!
Hi, Laura!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 3:36:28 PM, you wrote:
awc I get 150 or so per day that are junk! often more...
Well, I'm not up to that point. Yet. :)
--
--Scott.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G
real,
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:09:28 PM, you wrote:
DC I created a separate address book, called killfile, and discard all
DC mail from anyone that is KNOWN in that address book.
awc what i've found is that the messages are from tons of different
awc sources.. often the same message.. so for
of these machines.
awc i would like them to have the same filters on all machines..
awc she's trying TB now..
^
Multiple personality?
awc just an idea.. that obviously needs more thought... when I try to
awc tell people about all the capabilities, especially more
awc complicated
a checkbox that says to
LG inherit settings or something. It could even be a menued virtual
LG account so that the master account doesn't even have to show up in the
LG accounts list. This will tie in the filters, templates, message list
LG column views etc.
Oh, how I wish filters were global. having
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 23:05:44[GMT +0700](which was 17:05 where I
live) you wrote:
TF If you are talking about addressbook groups, I suspect you may have
TF your own address in that group too. So when you send a message to the
TF whole group, you'll get it as an incoming mail, of
Hello Scott,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at22:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 04:53 where I live)
you wrote:
SM If it's not a mailing list, then it doesn't really make sense, unless
SM you have (had) some kind of configuration problem where TB! thought that the
SM inbox folder was the Sent Mail folder.
I
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at21:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 03:53 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox anyway
RW so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically get threaded?
Hello Richard,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:11:04 +0100 GMT (10/10/02, 16:11 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
SM If it's not a mailing list, then it doesn't really make sense,
SM unless you have (had) some kind of configuration problem where
SM TB! thought that the inbox folder was the Sent Mail
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at21:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 03:53 where I live)
you wrote:
SM I suspect that you're confusing messages for a mailing list and normal
SM non-list messages.
SM When you send a normal (non-list) message, TB sends the email, then
SM plops it into the
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at11:31:35[GMT +0700](which was 05:31 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Even more baffled. So, if I send a mail to someone who is not in my
RW address book or on a mailing list, I have to CC it to myself to get a
RW copy?
TF It has nothing to do with your
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 08:25, Richard Wakeford wrote:
Until yesterday all my sent mail came back to the Inbox without a CC
or rule.
Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you
send? Ask them!
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q on
into the appropriate folder.
/ begin smart tip alert
When I am working with filters I usually also set a colour in the same
filter together with the action I am trying to create. This makes it
easy to check wether a certain filter was triggered and used ;-)
/ end smart tip alert
RW I think I'm slowly getting
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 8:22:54 AM, you wrote:
MO On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 08:25, Richard Wakeford wrote:
Until yesterday all my sent mail came back to the Inbox without a CC
or rule.
MO Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you
MO send? Ask them!
Hi,
Is there a way to export the filters?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, syv wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
s Is there a way to export the filters?
syv,
I'm not sure what is your ultimate intended use, so there may be other
ways to accomplish your objectives, but each filter can be copied and
the
Hallo syv,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:42:22 -0700GMT (9-10-02, 16:42 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
s Is there a way to export the filters?
Only the manual way: Ctrl-C Ctrl-V into a text-file
and to copy the whole sorting office, the account.srx file.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
ON Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 4:42:22 PM, you wrote:
s Is there a way to export the filters?
Hi syv,
You can copy (ctrl-c) and Paste (Ctr-V) them.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The sex was so good that even the neighbors had
On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, Joseph N. wrote:
The purpose is to move some of the filters to the mail
server [mostly to filter spam] and to make sure I do not
miss some.
-Original Message-
JNOn Wednesday, October 09, 2002, syv wrote in
JN [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL P
On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, syv wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
s The purpose is to move some of the filters to the mail
s server
syv,
Well, not sure what type of mail server you have, but the syntax for
the filters is very probably different. If that's
Hello syv,
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 2:14:59 PM, you wrote:
s On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, Joseph N. wrote:
s The purpose is to move some of the filters to the mail
s server [mostly to filter spam] and to make sure I do not
s miss some.
Hard to imagine a mail server running the Bat.
Try
On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, Joseph N. wrote:
-Original Message-
JNOn Wednesday, October 09, 2002, syv wrote in
JN [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
s The purpose is to move some of the filters to the mail
s server
JN syv,
JN Well, not sure what type of mail se
Hello myob,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at14:54:54[GMT +0100](which was 14:54 where I live)
you wrote:
MO Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you
MO send? Ask them!
m IIRC, Richard, that's what CIX/Ameol does.
Yes it does but I was still getting mail in my TB inbox
with filters I usually also set a colour in the same
G filter together with the action I am trying to create. This makes it
G easy to check wether a certain filter was triggered and used ;-)
G / end smart tip alert
Another good tip, thanks.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Hi, Richard!
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 1:28:02 AM, you wrote:
RW Hello Thomas,
RW Ah, all my questions being gradually answered apart from why messages
RW originally went to the inbox without a CC and now don't but I will
RW amend my rules so that outgoing messages go straight to the
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at11:43:36[GMT +0700](which was 05:43 where I live)
you wrote:
TF I filter mailing lists only at incoming time. Outgoing filters are
TF important for normal mail, where your sent message doesn't come back
TF to you.
Oh, I thought *all* mail comes back to me
Hello Scott,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at21:29:53[GMT -0500](which was 03:29 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me
RW half way down page one!
SM What are you still having trouble with? I'm trying to figure out
SM regular expressions
Hi, Richard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:12:30 AM, you wrote:
RW It's not that I'm having trouble with it because I don't think, in my
RW situation, I shall ever need such complicated rules. I just wish that
RW the more simple rules could be explained to remove any un clearness or
RW
Hello Richard,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:07:05 +0100 GMT (08/10/02, 14:07 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
RW Oh, I thought *all* mail comes back to me, at least mine does (I
RW think). Do you mean by normal mail that is not in the address
RW book?
No, I mean a mail that I sent just to a
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at22:40:47[GMT +0700](which was 16:40 where I live)
you wrote:
TF No, I mean a mail that I sent just to a recipient, not to a list. For
TF example if I send a message directly to your address. It will not come
TF back to me, unless I include my own address as
Richard-
I got lost somewhere in the circular logic here, but...
The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder. Are you
saying you want *another* copy sent to you? If so, then, yes, you need
to CC or BCC yourself. If you're just wanting confirmation that the
message you sent got to
Hello Mark,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at14:28:11[GMT -0700](which was 22:28 where I live)
you wrote:
MW I got lost somewhere in the circular logic here, but...
You're lost!! :-)
MW The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder.
That doesn't mean they reach their destination though. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
@8-Oct-2002, 22:54 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox
RW anyway so why
Richard-
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:54:08 PM, you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox anyway
RW so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically get threaded?
If your outgoing mail ends up in
Hi, Richard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 4:54:08 PM, you wrote:
MW The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder.
RW That doesn't mean they reach their destination though. I've had 3
RW messages in the last 24 hours that have just disappeared even though
RW they are shown as sent in
Hello Richard,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:44:11 +0100 GMT (09/10/02, 03:44 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
TF No, I mean a mail that I sent just to a recipient, not to a list. For
TF example if I send a message directly to your address. It will not come
TF back to me, unless I include my own
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:37:59[GMT +0100](which was 02:37 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox
RW anyway so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically
RW get
?
MW If your outgoing mail ends up in your inbox without your doing
MW anything then it sounds like you have a misbehaving outbound filter.
That's because, up until now, I didn't have any outbound filters
because I thought all messages (sent or received) automatically go to
the inbox.
--
Best
am still not sure exactly
what the definition is for a KLUDGE and when rules should be applied
(if at all) to the Outgoing, Read and Replied to folders. I gather
that outgoing filters only apply after going to the SMTP server so
does that mean they will be put in the correct folder when they return
ON Monday, October 7, 2002, 5:46:12 PM, you wrote:
RW Well,
RW I set up a filter for a mail group as described earlier and only half
RW the group messages make it to the relevant folder, the rest stay
RW obstinately in the inbox :-(
RW I have the rule adressees are sender to group .
Hi
the Outbox.
Read: after you have first opened the message, and then gone to the
next.
Replied: after the Reply has been saved to the Outbox.
RW I gather that outgoing filters only apply after going to the SMTP
RW server so does that mean they will be put in the correct folder
RW when they return as copies
Richard-
I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the
strings in the Filtering strings box are treated as AND clauses
rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more than one line
in the Filtering strings box, then *both* of those cases have to be
true in order for
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at12:12:36[GMT -0700](which was 20:12 where I live)
you wrote:
MW I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the
MW strings in the Filtering strings box are treated as AND clauses
MW rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more than
Hello Gerard,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:14:54[GMT +0200](which was 18:14 where I live)
you wrote:
G - You need to determine a UNIQUE filtering characteristic that does not
G change over time.
G The simplest being the email address a person.
I thought I had but I've been told one answer, the
you have understood the logic behind the filters, you will decide
TF this by yourself. One more tip: The filters are applied from top to
TF bottom. So if two filters apply for a message, the higher one is
TF applied first. If that is a MOVE filter, and the other one colours the
TF message, it won't
Hello Richard,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at 16:46:12 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
RW After reading all the FAQ and help files
Just wanted to check. Have you read:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/filtering.shtml
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor
Hello Leif,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at20:00:27[GMT -0600](which was 03:00 where I
live) you wrote:
LG Just wanted to check. Have you read:
LG http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/filtering.shtml
Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me
half way down page one!
--
Best
anyway, and
TF will be caught by the filter on the list.
RW Ok so, unless there are are reasons for complicated rules, I can
RW keep all my rules directed at the inbox?
I filter mailing lists only at incoming time. Outgoing filters are
important for normal mail, where your sent message doesn't come
Hello Miguel,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at11:22:53[GMT +0200](which was 10:22 where I live)
you wrote:
MAU Go to the Advanced tab of the filter and scroll down, you will see the
MAU option Address(es) must be listed in address book. Once you select
MAU this, you also have the option to The address
Well, I've looked but I probably can't see the wood for the trees. I'm
slowly getting to grips with all the features of this programme but can't
find a way to move messages from the Inbox to a specific folder which
contains 60 names. I want to sort mail from all or any of those names to
the
Hello Richard,
I want to sort mail from all or any of those names to
the corresponding box and am sure I don't have to input each address
separately but can't find the correct way of doing it.
Go to the Advanced tab of the filter and scroll down, you will see the
option Address(es) must be
Hello Miguel,
Saturday, October 5, 2002, 10:22:53 AM, you wrote:
MAU Go to the Advanced tab of the filter and scroll down, you will see the
MAU option Address(es) must be listed in address book. Once you select
MAU this, you also have the option to The address entry must belong to
MAU groups.
901 - 1000 of 1605 matches
Mail list logo
