Forgive me if this has been covered before. Is there a way to hide the
recipients in a group mailing (mass)?
--
Thank you,
James Senick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators
).
DH 2. Got to the address book and use the "New mass mailing" under
DH "File". for that you have to define a Quick Template. With this method
DH every one on your "list" will get a message personally delivered (TO =
DH addressee).
DH - --
DH Dierk Haasis
--
Bes
My HTML messages are listed as message.mv.
--
Best regards,
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My problem is fixed and I kind of understand how it happened. My
html messages were arriving as attached .mv files which normally
pertain to Miva Script files. I had recently changed the default
handler for that extension to another program for editing (EditPlus).
I simply deleted the
Thursday, March 22, 2001, 10:39:01 PM, you wrote:
Jim Must be nice... even after deleting the WCT entry from the Registry, mine still
show up
Jim as message.wct.. but on the positive side, when I double-click it, it shows up
properly
Jim in Netscape - images and all!! :)) I still would
Does theBat automatically filter duplicate address book entries when
performing a mass mailing?
Thanks in advance and I apologize if this question was answered
previously.
--
Best regards,
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Environment:
theBat! version 1.54 Beta/9
Alastair,
Saturday, December 01, 2001, 4:50:43 AM, you wrote:
Alastair For what it's worth, my opinion is that TB! is doing the right thing
Alastair (read but not write).
Alastair The problem is that home and business have radically different
Alastair requirements.
Good call. I'm glad to
Hi Januk,
Sunday, December 02, 2001, 12:31:38 AM, you wrote:
Januk Hello James,
Januk On Saturday, December 1, 2001 at 22:54 GMT -0500, a creature mimicking
Januk James Senick [JS] wrote:
JS One would still want to be able to personalize mass e-mail
JS messages and further more embed an ascii
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, December 02, 2001, 4:17:59 AM, you wrote:
Dierk The biggest problems for me are:
Dierk 1. People send HTML but *don't* use the HTML features, making
Dierk messages unnecessarily big. Those are the messages that look
Dierk exactly the same in HTML and PT.
Sean,
I got the same. But I think that was an auto generated
send from the trojan. Possibly not. But that would be my first
guess seeing how it was the BadTrans worm that was attached.
Apparently it scans inboxes for new prospects. I think people
in this list are far above that sort
Hi Cyclon,
Sunday, December 02, 2001, 1:35:06 PM, you wrote:
Kris Hello, I also have a question about HTML : I know that I can't create
Kris a HTML message, but what do I have to do when I want to reply to a
Kris HTML message, or when I want to forward it? Then the HTML structure
Kris is lost,
Roberto,
Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 9:49:30 PM, Roberto wrote:
RP Newsreader: We still have not decided on what it will look like -
RP as a plug-in or as a built-in function...
MDP I have no idea what is happening with that.
Roberto I *really* hope it doesn't happen. If TB is a MUA, it
Karin,
I sympathize with your situation as I am sure Marck
does. What you may not be aware of is, if I'm not incorrect,
Marck has developed the FAQ voluntarily - as in he wanted to
help others without deriving any financial benefit. Don't take
offense as my intent isn't to make you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, at 20:15:51 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:15:51
PM in NY, USA) Peter Kerekes wrote:
Peter Kerekes Actually it would be even better, if possible , to use the
Peter Kerekes same filter I set up already for incoming mail and add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello William,
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, at 13:02:51 [GMT +] (which was 8:02:51
AM in NY, USA) William Moore wrote:
William Moore Thank you for your email dated Sunday, March 03, 2002, 11:29:27 AM, in
which you wrote:
MAU Scot's article is anything but an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Shahar,
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002, at 18:46:33 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:46:33
AM in NY, USA) Shahar wrote:
Shahar I have few accounts and I check for new mail every X minutes.
Shahar Is there a way to temporarly stop Periodecally check for all the
Shahar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, at 16:39:26 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:39:26
AM in NY, USA) Roelof Otten wrote:
Roelof Otten Recently I found a program called postcastserver that
Roelof Otten does the same, but is freeware where ADR has to be paid after
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 17:37:52 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:37:52
AM in NY, USA) Peter Palmreuther wrote:
There's _no_ such limit in RFC-(2)822 that is near 150+ characters, the
only limit given is: 999 characters, and a recommendation to have lines no
longer than 78 or 80
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 23:57:51 [GMT +0700] (which was 12:57:51
PM in NY, USA) Thomas F. wrote:
JS That is the part that intrigues me--something that
JS can take TB down. The question arises; what else could it do?
This is a very good question. Do you have any other access to
Hello Julian,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 21:11:10 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:11:10
PM in NY, USA) Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
I think that Popcorn might do this - it works only on messages on the
server without downloading. It is no longer available from
the developers, but if you search for
Hello ETM,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (which was 1:49:09
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
Limitations
Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the
anti-virus plugin interface of The Bat!. The plugin is called
only on message attachments. Outgoing messages are scanned
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] (which was 5:17:31
PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote:
My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually
cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG
does not have that capability?
It will catch them. It's
Hello Jim,
I added this to the list several months ago with the added wish
that threads also be configurable i.e. dragging a message from
one thread to another and having it inherit it's new thread's
subject. I don't think anyone understood what I was talking
about.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at
Hello brunson,
Yes, that's a nifty workaround but certainly not a
solution...and Allie already suggested this. Nevertheless, you
forgot to mention that during this process, you have to save the
edited message which, unfortunately, adjusts the date.
But hey, I could just adjust my clock settings
Hello Gerard,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 23:24:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:24:03
PM in NY, USA) Gerard wrote:
Hi James,
It amazes me that someone who wants to edit an received email is
worried about the time and date.
It amazes me why many don't understand the need for it. If I
had to
Hello Allie,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 18:35:16 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:35:16
PM in NY, USA) Allie C Martin wrote:
This sounds so good that I think I'll go set this up now. :)
And I'll save this message for when and if a moving threads
option is ever available. If I had it, this is what I'd
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:35:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:35:40
AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote:
Wrong. I do change occasionally the subject line *in conversation*.
That is, I assign a meaningful/changed subject line to a reply. I am
very particular when it comes to vital
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 12:21:50 [GMT +0200] (which was 6:21:50
AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote:
What I cannot do is take your comments, adjust them as I like (even
for private use!) and then either say it is mine or it is yours. What
I can do, is write something that is
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:46:13 [GMT -0400] (which was 9:46:13
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Without commenting on the merits of your
position one way or the other, it strikes
me that you may be coming to this question
from a very different POV that some of the
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 10:15:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:15:54
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JS [...] There's simply no reason not to
JS have this feature available. [/...]
Sure there is.
This is a different program the
feature[s] you are talking about can be
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 11:19:22 [GMT -0400] (which was 11:19:22
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
A valid point but I think lobbying for
something that already exists in a
different form sort of belongs in the dept.
of redundancy dept.
Redundancy? Redundancy? I'm
Hello Batters,
New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
across first in XNews. For lists, I'd really like to be able to
highlight incoming messages of a thread interesting or important
to me. Perhaps some would
Hello Dierk,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 19:23:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:23:27
PM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote:
Hello James!
On Sunday, September 29, 2002 at 6:52:34 PM you wrote:
Is this worth pursuing to anyone else?
There is a difference in handling e-mail and news - XNews and Agent
Hello Scott,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 12:31:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 1:31:57
PM in NY, USA) Scott McNay wrote:
Methinks you're missing the point. Mark Thread means you're
interested in the subject and want it highlighted or something so that
you can read it first, before any other
Hello pmf,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 15:34:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 3:34:49
PM in NY, USA) pmf wrote:
J New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
J really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
J across first in XNews.
The Watch Thread feature has been in news
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 23:51:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 6:51:23
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Every time a new thread comes up that I want to watch, I just add
the subject as an alternative search. Works a treat! Every so often
I tidy the filter up and remove old
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 04:00:02 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:00:02
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
You are. The watch filter works on the Inbox. It highlights any mail
you are currently watching, moving it to the Inbox (i.e. not moving
it at all). The mail is then
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 12:43:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:43:21
AM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JS ... if you wanted to set a hotkey to apply this filter to
JS already 'in-house' threads / messages, they'd be moved back to
JS the inbox from the folder you were browsing.
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 08:09:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:09:46
AM in NY, USA) James Senick wrote:
Not necessarily. I just added Ctrl-Alt-W as the hotkey for the
filter and left the Check the selected message against this rule
unchecked. It works perfectly, applying the watched
Hello Doug,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 10:48:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:48:28
AM in NY, USA) Doug Weller wrote:
What don't you like about Mailbag Assistant?
Has anyone tried Forkeeps?
Reply to this message has been sent directly to you and to TBOT
as well as this thread has been declared
Hello Jonathan,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 14:03:20 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:03:20
PM in NY, USA) Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Monday, September 30, 2002, Doug Weller wrote...
Here's the filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Export for editing
Active: 1
Source: \\alliem\Inbox
Target: \\alliem\Inbox
Hello Miguel,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, at 19:16:49 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:16:49
PM in NY, USA) Miguel A. Urech wrote:
OK, I found what it was. What I did originally was neglect to
set the folder to Inbox...instead it was set to TBDUL. So each
time I used the hotkey combo on any thread
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 00:06:08 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06:08
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MAU Like you, I don't understand why they are not moved. That is
MAU what I find odd. A bug perhaps? A _useful_ bug?
No, an intended feature. It has always been so and designed
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 02:15:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:15:28
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JS IOW, if you leave it alone, TB never moves the message at all.
JS But if you actively configure it to move the message to the
JS inbox, then it actually does?
Manually
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, at 15:19:58 [GMT -0700] (which was 6:19:58
PM in NY, USA) Chris Weaven wrote:
Hi all,
As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred
anti-virus program is out there.
I use two -- Panda AntiVirus Platinum and AVG. I have used and
trusted
Hello Adam,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, at 17:45:12 [GMT -0230] (which was 4:15:12
PM in NY, USA) Adam wrote:
JA cd\progra~1\
JA then type
JA dir
JA and see what it tells you The Bat! folder is. Mine shows as
JA thebat~1...
Will that be the same in Windows XP? I can't duplicate the above in
XP.
Hello Don,
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, at 20:41:24 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:41:24
PM in NY, USA) Don Zeigler wrote:
People seem to like the community feel of a message board. Not to mention
that a board offers yet more pages for indexing by search engines,
increasing a program's visibility.
Good
Hello Tim,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, at 10:13:32 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:13:32
AM in NY, USA) Tim Musson wrote:
Could you keep this on the List? I don't want to send HTML mail, but
would like to know how if I *need* to in the future.
No way, man. It's mine...j/k
Personally, I have no problem
Hello Anne,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, at 04:28:20 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:28:20
PM in NY, USA) Anne wrote:
Is there a way of getting round this - apart from not using
the mail key which I won't not do - does anyone know?
Create a shortcut to the shortcut with the NOLOGO switch?
--
Best
Hello Anne,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, at 03:42:27 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:42:27
PM in NY, USA) Anne wrote:
JS For a goof, try this:
Just for fun I tried creating another batch file which runs the
original batch file which has the /nologo parameter. I programmed the
hotkey to run the second
Hello Daniel,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, at 22:52:11 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:52:11
PM in NY, USA) Daniel Dekany wrote:
I don't understand why people who uses on-access scanner (and you do,
if I don't misunderstand you) want integrate Virus protection with
TB!, but perhaps I miss something.
I
Hello DG,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, at 11:33:26 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:33:26
AM in NY, USA) DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
Again, and I'm sure this subject will hit the dead topic instruction
soon, I would not consider Re: being utilized in a business
correspondence nor memo as Regarding. My reasoning?
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:55:49 [GMT +0700] (which was 9:55:49
PM in NY, USA) Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was referring
to: Should it be
Hello Spike,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:33:24 [GMT -0500] (which was 9:33:24
AM in NY, USA) Spike wrote:
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
JS Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
Easy enough for something that should not be easily done!
Point taken. But you can't veto every
Hello Miguel,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 19:18:20 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:18:20
PM in NY, USA) Miguel A. Urech wrote:
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
It should be fairly easy to do with PowerPro. I'll try it later or
during the weekend.
Allie was kind enough to write a
Hello Nick,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 18:32:14 [GMT +] (which was 1:32:14
PM in NY, USA) Nick Dutton wrote:
Surely an answer (if there is to be one) is to add, rather than modify?
If each stored message was given _extra_ fields: Subject(modified) and
Body(modified), these could then be
on reporting methods is buried within Knujon's
CastleCops forum:
http://www.castlecops.com/f240-Knujon_General_Discussion.html
--
Best regards,
James Senick
The Bat! v.3.86.11 beta
Windows XP build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using
57 matches
Mail list logo
