Hello Mary and others following this thread,
In response to the message Mary Bull sent to Allie on 14/07/2004
regarding Changing the Subject Header (sent with a Subject Header
Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v.
2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])
Since the focus
Hello Douglas!
On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 8:53 AM, you wrote:
DH Secondly Mary, I never bawled you out. I simply changed the Subject
DH Header back to what it was, since 1).- the subject hadn't changed
DH and 2).- I was using the header to follow up / reply to the answers
DH received.
One
Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
I like the term hijacking! I have come to try to NOT change a subject
AT ALL unless the thread is COMPLETELY no longer relevant to the
subject, in which case (as here) I now start another thread.
That's a safe approach. :)
Just remember that this judgement call
Maggie, [M] wrote:
You know Allie, I thought about this subject line before naming it
such and since the problem lies with the *unread* folder, that's what
I named it in the subject line. Paul and Thomas didn't seem to have
any problem with the subject line as they gave very plausible
On Tue 13 July 2004, 9:42:57 +1000, Rich Gregory wrote:
I recently added a filter that was supposed to trash emails that had a
subject line where there were too many spaces in it but it is not working.
...snip...
I copied and pasted it into my system, and it appears you didn't turn
On Tue 13 July 2004, 14:14:26 +1000, Rich Gregory wrote:
I recently added a filter that was supposed to trash emails that had a
subject line where there were too many spaces in it but it is not working.
RA I copied and pasted it into my system, and it appears you didn't turn on
RA the regular
. As a result, it's difficult for the passing
A reader to tell without actually reading the message, what the query is
A about.
You know Allie, I thought about this subject line before naming it
such and since the problem lies with the *unread* folder, that's what
I named it in the subject line. Paul
Hi !
I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat gives me the following error
message as
soon as I try to declare a message as Spam:
#QUOTE#
ACCESS VIOLATION AT ADDRESS 7788206B IN MODULE NTDLL.DLL - READ OF ADDRESS0018
#UNQUOTE#
Can anyone help me on this?
greets,
Markus
Hallo M.Laue,
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:57:45 +0200GMT (10-7-2004, 9:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ML I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat
ML gives me the following error message as
ML soon as I try to declare a message as Spam:
Reinstall the plug-in
If that doesn't help
==Original message text===
From: M.Laue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TheBat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, July 10, 2004, 9:57:45 AM
Subject: (no subject)
ML Hi !
ML I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat gives me the following
error message as
ML soon as I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
I am using the QT FIXSUBJ from the silverstones library. I repeat it
for clarification:
Quick Template 5.
Description : Fixup a messy Re: subject
Handle : FIXSUBJ
%SUBJECT=Re:%SETPATTREGEXP='(?i)\A(?::?\s*)%-
(?:(?:\s*(?:fwd|re|aw
Dear Michael,
@9-Jul-2004, 08:49 -0700 (09-Jul 16:49 UK time) Michael L. Wilson
said to The:
... snip
Any ideas or better ways to clean the subject line would be
appreciated.
Here's what I use:
,--/ New version of subject cleaner \--
%___%REM=clean subject - by daniel hahler
On Fri 9-Jul-04 10:49am -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I am using the QT FIXSUBJ from the silverstones library. I repeat it
for clarification:
More often than not, these days, it simply reduces my subject to RE:
with nothing else. I did not modify this at all. Any ideas or better
ways
it (pun intended). :-) I do use
threading and don't read all messages. Cntrl+Shft+M comes in very handy,
but is only good when people maintain conversation which relates to
original subject. If conversation changes, then I might mark messages
read that I may have wanted to read, but didn't know it. Hope
conversation which relates to original subject. ...
Well, I'm trying, but sometimes it's hard. For instance, it was
important to me to respond to your comment about the pun. But that
doesn't relate to the subject.
Yet, the main part of what I wanted to say, although it's the shorter
part in words
Paul Cartwright wrote:
When I'm too lazy to start a new message and find the addressbook
entry, I just hit reply, remove those references, and change the subject
to what I want it to say :) a cheaters way to create a new message.
With TBUDL in my address book and auto-complete on, a new
Hello Ken!
On Friday, July 02, 2004, 6:24 PM, you wrote:
PC When I'm too lazy to start a new message and find the addressbook
PC entry, I just hit reply, remove those references, and change the subject
PC to what I want it to say :) a cheaters way to create a new message.
kg With TBUDL in my
On Friday, July 2, 2004, 7:24 PM, you wrote:
kg With TBUDL in my address book and auto-complete on, a new message to
kg the list is as simple as Ctrl+N and typing tbu in the To: field.
kg Surely simpler/easier/quicker/lazier than what you describe?
it can be, but I also have extenuating
hit Reply to your original
message, changed the Subject field content, selected References from the context
menu which displayed a number of message numbers, deleted them and now will send this
off and see ... what happens!
--
Best regards,
subscriber2listmailto
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:32 PM, you wrote:
TGM I think follow up would be references in version 2.00.
s Not sure if this is going to work, but ... I obviously hit Reply
s to your original message, changed the Subject field content, selected
s References from the context menu which
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:51:00 PM, you wrote:
Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability,
which makes it like a new message, not a reply.
Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original
thread.~shrug~
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat!
Hello Terry!
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:55 PM, you wrote:
PC Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability,
PC which makes it like a new message, not a reply.
TGM Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original
TGM thread.~shrug~
But, having identified
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:55 PM, you wrote:
Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability,
which makes it like a new message, not a reply.
TGM Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original
TGM thread.~shrug~
right. changing the subject alone
[new msg IDT template]
,
--
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Thu 1 July 2004, 15:06:20 +1000, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
[new msg IDT template]
,
Was that an oops I didn't mean to send that moment? :)
--
Robin Anson
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is
Hi Everyone,
Is there a key-combination to highlight any of the To: Cc: Bcc:
Subject: header lines without having to tab forward and backward?
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part
Wednesday, June 9, 2004, Arthur Tan wrote:
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part of the window?
There are the standard Windows ones: Ctrl+Shift+RightArrow for select to
end of
Hi Urban,
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, 12:29:40 PM, you wrote:
Wednesday, June 9, 2004, Arthur Tan wrote:
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part of the window?
There are the
Regards
--
Manfred
___
[ TheBat 2.11.02 (43946CE3), Windows 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2, v.2096 ]
NOTE: The information contained in this
Hello Arnaud,
On 2 Jun 2004 at 19:32:30 +0200 GMT [19:32 CEST] you wrote:
AL Yop,
AL I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i
AL can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me :
AL ° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
AL °
Yop,
I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i
can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me :
° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
° Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
How come this file doesn't exist ?
AW
Hi
I'm testing the Bat! and what a great program !
I'm trying to use Bayesit filter... but it doesn't seem to work very
well. I'l tagging as junk every Spam I receive but until now spam are
always incoming to my inbox and not to the junk box.
Can anyone help with the settings of this filter
Hello Arnaud,
On 1 Jun 2004 at 13:33:06 +0200 GMT [13:33 CEST] you wrote:
AL Hi
AL I'm testing the Bat! and what a great program !
AL I'm trying to use Bayesit filter... but it doesn't seem to work very
AL well. I'l tagging as junk every Spam I receive but until now spam are
AL always incoming
don't think about its users - it
think about some stupid RFC.
Also this BUG with ?subject= is not that case when you have to speak about
RFC.
It must be done so that The Bat understands spaces and this will neither
way break the work of The Bat with RFC.
=/ -Original Message-
=/ From
Hello makc666,
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 9:05:09 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
Also this BUG with ?subject= is not that case when you have to speak about
RFC.
It must be done so that The Bat understands spaces and this will neither
way break the work of The Bat with RFC.
I understand
users - it
think about some stupid RFC.
There are very few stupid RFCs... the rest are written for people to
communicate with... if they didn't exist, people wouldn't be able to
communicate on the internet.
Also this BUG with ?subject= is not that case when you have to speak about
RFC.
RFC says
Hello makc666,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 10:05:09 +0400 GMT (29/05/2004, 13:05 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mnr The Bat! Is made for users and not for RFCs.
If TB ever goes down that road (taking the RFCs not so seriously), I
won't be the only one to run away screaming.
mnr So you just
I read welcome message:
=/ FAQ at: lt;http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.htmlgt; and the
=/ list archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try yourself:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=tbudl_thebat_dutaint_com
restrict=exclude=words=subject
No matches
-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=tbudl_thebat_dutaint_com
M restrict=exclude=words=subject
M No matches were found for 'subject'
Not a good search.
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?restrict=;exclude=;config=tbudl_thebat_dutaint_com;words=html%20mailto%20URL%20bug;page=1
Leads
Hello Marck,
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:16:00 AM, you wrote:
MDP Now, where did I put that trout?
http://www.aaofla.com/webpages/halloffame/fame1/trout-7.jpg
There! And I can see why you forgot about the fish! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/8
* someone writes:
I don't know quit if it is a BUG but I thinks yes.
It is not.
a href=mailto:...?subject=Contact addressesPress
vs.
a href=mailto:...?subject=Contact%20addresses;Press
So he replaced space with %20 then The Bat! will catch the subject to
the email right as Contact
Hi makc666,
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, at 12:42:13 AM PST, you wrote:
Try yourself:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=tbudl_thebat_dutaint_com
restrict=exclude=words=subject
In addition to what others here have said about this, I do find it
ironic that you're complaining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
mid:!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACABgA/C/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
80% of users who use The Bat even don't know what is RFC or who webmaster
is.
But they communicaty and they are happy.
They don't need to read the RFCs, since they are using software which
was
Hello Melissa,
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 10:24:01 PM, you wrote:
MR In addition to what others here have said about this, I do find it
MR ironic that you're complaining about TB!'s handling of URLs when your
MR own email client has wrapped the long URL you posted here. In order to
MR even use it
Hellow all.
My first post here.
I don't know quit if it is a BUG but I thinks yes.
If web-master used in his code line like:
a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] addressesPress
here to email me/a
When The Bat! User will press on that link in subject line he will see only
word Contact.
And not the full
Hello makc666,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 09:28:53 +0400 GMT (29/05/2004, 12:28 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mnr I think that The Bat! must work correct if there are spaces in ?subject=
mnr and the current situation is a BUG of The Bat!
The Bat works correctly, and the link is incorrect
Hæ!
I want to set up a filter to filter messages without a subject line
into a specific folder.
Setting up a filter is easy, but how do I get the kludges filter to
work on empty subject lines?
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de/
[The Bat! v2.11 Beta/6 without BayesIt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TN Setting up a filter is easy, but how do I get the kludges filter to
TN work on empty subject lines?
You don't need a kludges filter; a subject filter will do.
Set the signal string to ^$ (without the quotes)
Set Options|Regular Expressions [X
Just wondering if it's possible to filter on a blank subject
line? If so, what would I need to put in as the filter string?
--
Cheers,
Anne Registered Linux user #345132
Flying high with The Bat! v2.04.7 on Xandros Desktop 2.0 - Linux
Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial
Hallo Anne,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 00:20:47 +0100GMT (17-5-04, 1:20 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A Just wondering if it's possible to filter on a blank subject
A line? If so, what would I need to put in as the filter string?
Sure.
Filter string would be something:
Subject:\s*\n
Location
On Monday, May 17, 2004, 12:52:34 AM, Roelof wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
R Sure.
Brilliant! Thanks Roelof, that worked just fine. :)
--
Cheers,
Anne Registered Linux user #345132
Flying high with The Bat! v2.04.7 on Xandros Desktop 2.0 - Linux
Visit The
Hello TBUDL,
Starting using the spell checker I wonder why it does not check on the
subject.
If someone should also like this and if it's not on Bugtracker already,
please feel free to put it into there.
Thanks.. :o)
--
shinE!
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc
Lifted
How can I change the font size a html message is displayed in?
I have a big screen and the html messages display with a tiny font.
All other messages display with the fonts I set in the viewer/editor
options of the preferences.
Regards
--
Manfred
Hi all,
I'm trying TB 2.10.03 and I have a couple of questions:
Where can I set global read email time?
How could I edit the subject field in received email?
--
Thanks,
Angel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Angel,
On 04-05-2004 17:05, you [AD] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AD I'm trying TB 2.10.03 and I have a couple of questions:
AD Where can I set global read email time?
You can't This is set on a per account basis.
AD How could I edit the subject field in received email?
You can't
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 9:17:32 AM, you wrote:
AD Where can I set global read email time?
PF You can't This is set on a per account basis.
Peter, I don´t find how to set the time to mark as read
the messages arriving through filters to common folders.
I´ve looked in folders' Properties but
Hello Angel,
Peter, I don´t find how to set the time to mark as read
the messages arriving through filters to common folders.
I´ve looked in folders' Properties but I don't find it.
Select any common folder and then select Account/Properties on the top
menu. This will bring up the common
MAU,
On 04-05-2004 20:11, you [M] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M Select any common folder and then select Account/Properties on the
M top menu. This will bring up the common folders preferences.
Thanks. _I_ didn't know that! :)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 1:11:17 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Angel,
Peter, I don´t find how to set the time to mark as read
the messages arriving through filters to common folders.
I´ve looked in folders' Properties but I don't find it.
M Select any common folder and then select Account/Properties
Hello Angel,
Muchas gracias Miguel.
De nada. Ahora me doy cuenta que escribes desde Cuba :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.03
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
ON Wednesday, March 31, 2004, 10:11:13 PM, you wrote:
PJ I've deleted and redone the filter a couple of times too. It's
PJ currently at the bottom of a list of incoming filters, but I've
PJ moved it up with no difference. Any help greatly appreciated!
Pat,
I can not see anything obviously wrong
ON Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 11:29:16 PM, you wrote:
PJ (Though messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not filtered into
PJ the correct folder, for some reason. Very simple filter: just the
PJ email address as the filter string (sender); the folder
PJ specified. Doesn't budge though. Sigh.)
Hi Pat,
Hello bats,
on Tue, 30. Mar 2004 at 12:22:59 -0600 P.Johnson wrote:
...Not sure what the #%- signifies (in the first line of the
template)?
RA The # is a delimiter, everything between the first and second instances of
RA # are what happens if the from address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 1:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I used the following macro in my account--forward template:
PJ %IF:'%OFromAddr'='[EMAIL PROTECTED]':#%-
PJ %ModifyOnce(Subject)%-
PJ %Subject=FWD: (From Bill Smith) %OSubj
PJ %TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]#%-
PJ ...and this works
Hi Gerard,
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004, 2:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G ON Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 11:29:16 PM, you wrote:
PJ (Though messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are not filtered into
PJ the correct folder, for some reason. Very simple filter: just the
PJ email address as the filter
... is there something in macro language that precludes
an extra email address dot, and the macro working properly?
I think you'll need to post your template to the list, because it is not
apparent (at least to me) why this should be so. I certainly don't appear
to have any problems with the subject line macro when
Robin,
On Monday, March 29, 2004, 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RA On Tue 30 March 2004, 9:21:05 +1000, P.Johnson wrote:
...
...Not sure what the #%- signifies (in the first line of the
template)?
RA The # is a delimiter, everything between the first and second instances of
RA # are what
I used the following macro in my account--forward template:
%IF:'%OFromAddr'='[EMAIL PROTECTED]':#%-
%ModifyOnce(Subject)%-
%Subject=FWD: (From Bill Smith) %OSubj
%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]#%-
...and this works, except that I made an error in the forwarding
address. It should be [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello shinE!
On Sunday, March 28, 2004, 12:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dh on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 13:00:24 -0600 P.Johnson wrote:
Is it possible to add text to a Subject Line when forwarding
the message, using a QT or filter?
dh of course.. :)
dh ...
dh Because of that I would suggest
Hi Martin,
On Sunday, March 28, 2004, 12:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW On 28 March 2004, 13:00 -0600 (20:00 local time) P.Johnson [PJ] in
MW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ Is it possible to add text to a Subject Line when forwarding
PJ the message, using a QT or filter?
PJ...
MW %SUBJECT
On Monday, March 29, 2004, 5:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dh on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 13:00:24 -0600 P.Johnson wrote:
Is it possible to add text to a Subject Line when forwarding
the message, using a QT or filter?
dh of course.. :)
dh ...
dh Because of that I would suggest that you extend
:
%IF:'%OFromAddr'='[EMAIL PROTECTED]':#%-
%ModifyOnce(Subject)%-
%Subject=FWD: (From Bill Smith) %OSubj
%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]#%-
This is a forwarded message.
From: %OFromName %OFromAddr
To: %OToList
Date: %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn
Hello all,
Is it possible to add text to a Subject Line when forwarding
the message, using a QT or filter?
I am looking for a fairly quick way to add From Bill Smith to
the FWD:... subject line while keeping the original text
intact.
If there is a way to do it automatically (since it is always
Hello bats,
on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 13:00:24 -0600 P.Johnson wrote:
Is it possible to add text to a Subject Line when forwarding
the message, using a QT or filter?
of course.. :)
I am looking for a fairly quick way to add From Bill Smith to
the FWD:... subject line while keeping
Hello Bats,
Is it possible to determine what the subject of a reply will be in an email?
f.i. :
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
will open your mailer with a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
but with a blank subjectline.
I would like to have
Hello Mark,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 2:33:53 PM, you wrote:
Mark I know this is possible in webpages, but can it be done in
Mark mails?
Sure...
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or (but sometimes problematic):
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The
Hi Mark,
on Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:33:53 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MP Is it possible to determine what the subject of a reply will be in an email?
MP f.i. :
MP * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
MP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MP will open your mailer with a message to
MP [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Leif,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 10:43:40 PM, you wrote:
LG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LG or (but sometimes problematic):
LG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks! It was the questionmark I was omited.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.04.7
Hello Peter,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 11:04:42 PM, you wrote:
PM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'t
Thanks to you too!
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.04.7
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:16:51 AM, you wrote:
kg Do the mods have a moderator template for proper subject line
kg posting? With all the reminders I've seen, it seems like something
kg to encourage people to put relevant info in the subject lines
kg would be a good idea.
No, we
Leif Gregory wrote:
Personally, I feel
people should be responsible enough to put in meaningful subject lines
and moderating those just adds one more restriction we are imposing on
the list.
You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
intervention that exists now (top
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:53:43 AM, you wrote:
kg You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
kg intervention that exists now (top-posting, cut lines, etc.)
You could if a single immutable fact wasn't true. Because of our
current intervention, the TB lists are,
Leif Gregory wrote:
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:53:43 AM, you wrote:
kg You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
kg intervention that exists now (top-posting, cut lines, etc.)
You could if a single immutable fact wasn't true. Because of our
current intervention, the TB
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 2:58:20 PM, you wrote:
kg Perhaps. Or TheBat! as a product tends to attract users that are a
kg bit more mature and level-headed. I suspect it's a combination of
kg many things. But I do agree that the TB lists are among the most
kg civil and helpful I've
Hello Marck,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 3:34:39 PM, you wrote:
MDP Actually, go right ahead! This is a special Ken Green moderated
MDP post. Don't do it again! ;-)
Grumble, grumble, beat me to the punch, grumble. ;-)
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.04.4
could make a good
case for the mods going overboard. But the posts are consistent and
non-attacking, and guess what Because of the *subject line* of the
mod posts, it's easy to skip them without having to read each one.
Hmm... now that's a good point... helpful subject lines...
--
Ken
. It looked so real at first glance...
Yeah, the little bugger beat me to the punch :-)
kg Hmm... now that's a good point... helpful subject lines...
grin Yeah, time to merge threads!
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.04.4 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello,
2.02. CE, view threads by references, fine, view threads by subject,
no headers, just the '+' boxes.
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Doug and Helen's Dogs: http
On Sun 4 January 2004, 1:37:39 +1000, Cs4l wrote:
Actually, this would not solve my issue.
SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would
want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the
filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header
Hello,
Don't interpret what I write negatively, I'm very happy with SpamPal!
Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam
and includes markers in the subject line of the received message.
How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat so that filters do
as spam
C and includes markers in the subject line of the received message.
C How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat so that filters do
C not grab the message each time I re-apply filters to the folder?
C I need to get rid of things like:
C **SPAM** **SPAM REGEX ID#363100123-86
* cs4l [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam
and includes markers in the subject line of the received message.
How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat
This is not possible without exporting, editing and reimporting
my issue.
SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would
want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the
filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header instead
of the subject tags.
Any idea?
--
Best regards,
cs4l
ON Saturday, January 3, 2004, 3:37:39 PM, you wrote:
c Actually, this would not solve my issue.
c SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would
c want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the
c filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove
unsubscribe upwada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hallo The.Limit,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:20:02 -0800GMT (15-12-03, 19:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TL unsubscribe upwada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folder template?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
Monday, December 15, 2003, 11:05:21 AM, you wrote:
RO Folder template?
Following unsub instructions ... sigh
I wonder if it worked??? lol!
Lynn
--
TheBat 2.02.3 CE Win2kPro SP2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
Hallo Lynn,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:42:09 -0800GMT (15-12-03, 20:42 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RO Folder template?
TL Following unsub instructions ... sigh
With the focus (in TB) on your tbudl folder, I presume.
TL I wonder if it worked??? lol!
Depends on your folder template.
If it
Monday, December 15, 2003, 12:12:20 PM, you wrote:
RO Depends on your folder template.
RO If it contains %to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it will work, if it
RO contains %to=%to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] it won't.
There's no template involved ... I just sent a *bare*
mail, apart from the commands ... but I
301 - 400 of 1423 matches
Mail list logo
