Re: Youtube Digest Subscription Display

>> Hello TBUDL, >> When I get Youtube digests, they are not wrapped in the display >> window, and the video previews are too large. It is quite >> impossible to comfortably read them. I'm a new Bat! user coming >> from Thunderbird. Another thing is that I just edite

Re: Youtube Digest Subscription Display

> Hello TBUDL, > When I get Youtube digests, they are not wrapped in the display > window, and the video previews are too large. It is quite > impossible to comfortably read them. I'm a new Bat! user coming > from Thunderbird. Another thing is that I just edited the

Youtube Digest Subscription Display

Hello TBUDL, When I get Youtube digests, they are not wrapped in the display window, and the video previews are too large. It is quite impossible to comfortably read them. I'm a new Bat! user coming from Thunderbird. Another thing is that I just edited the message

Can current digest tab standout ?

These old eyes have trouble picking out the tab for the digest entry I am currently reading. The shape of the current tab is slightly different, trapezoidal rather than parallelogram-shaped. It would be easier to pick out the current tab from among the others if it were highlighted or coloured

Receiving e-mail digest ungarbled

Using TheBat, I receive digest e-mail from a different list, running under L-Soft listserv. Much of the digest is garbled. I assume this is a poor translation of HTML attachments or something similar. I complained on the list, and someone told me to change the viewer. In TheBat, would this mean

Re: Aletrnatives to AVG? (The Janitor) [TBUDL Digest, Vol 207, Issue 12]

On 09 February 2006 - 06:46, William, on the matter of AVG, said Hello MFPA, SNIP I've used NOD for about five years, never been infected (I know I shouldn't say things like that), never had an FP. There's no need to quarantine - NOD will send samples to ESET automatically,

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 207, Issue 3 [ The ultimate Virus...!!!??)

Hallo Stephen, On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 06:26:28 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 20:26 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SL> "The ultimate Virus, a self-installing copy of Bob." SL> What the...??? Just shows my age. For the rest I only can say that this is rather off topic. -- Groetjes, Roelof It is hard

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 207, Issue 3 [ The ultimate Virus...!!!??)

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:30:24 +1100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Groetjes, Roelof The ultimate Virus, a self-installing copy of Bob. The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM "The ultimate Viru

Re: Dealing with Yahoogroups digest

Hello Vazirani & everyone else, on 12-Nov-2005 at 06:24 you (Vazirani) wrote: > We all know that yahoogroups digest mode is an efficient way to deal with > a very active groups and lots of posts. Is there any way around to make > each message become tabbed? It depends on the l

Dealing with Yahoogroups digest

Hello All, Being a passive member and a good listener (..err..wathcer?), now I have something really tickle my curiousity. We all know that yahoogroups digest mode is an efficient way to deal with a very active groups and lots of posts. Is there any way around to make each message become

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 201, Issue 35

Hi lists, Saturday, August 20, 2005, 12:10:03 PM, you wrote: >> Hi TBUDL'ers, > >> Bayes Filter plugin v2.0.3 has stopped working. It was working fine, >> catching pretty much everything (I get like 50 spam msgs/day). After >> I edited the Whitelist exclusions list, it stopped and no messages ar

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 201, Issue 35

> Hi TBUDL'ers, > Bayes Filter plugin v2.0.3 has stopped working. It was working fine, > catching pretty much everything (I get like 50 spam msgs/day). After > I edited the Whitelist exclusions list, it stopped and no messages are > sent to the Junk folder now. > I tried uninstall/reinstall (and

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 198, Issue 54

nfo/tbudl trtdc> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to trtdc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] trtdc> You can reach the person managing the list at trtdc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] trtdc> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific t

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 193, Issue 35

; or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to trtdc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] trtdc> You can reach the person managing the list at trtdc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] trtdc> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific trtd

Re: Jeremy needs help with something??? - was Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 191, Issue 20

Hello Marck D Pearlstone & everyone else 04-Okt-2004 18:03, you wrote: J>>> HEP LG>> And what is it exactly you need help with? > My guess: Folder Templates!!! He was flooded by list mails (I wonder how these people manage to subscribe to the list first han

Re: Jeremy needs help with something??? - was Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 191, Issue 20

Dear Leif, @4-Oct-2004, 09:27 -0600 (04-Oct 16:27 UK time) Leif Gregory [LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jérémy: J>> HEP LG> And what is it exactly you need help with? My guess: Folder Templates!!! Look at his post - he tried to write to the tbudl-requ

Jeremy needs help with something??? - was Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 191, Issue 20

Hello Jérémy, Monday, October 4, 2004, 9:18:20 AM, you wrote: J> HEP And what is it exactly you need help with? -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.

Re: TBUDL Digest, Vol 191, Issue 20

HEP Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: digest mode problem

Roelof- Friday, February 6, 2004, 5:08:41 PM, you wrote: RO> That's really weird, since they arrived here in the good order RO> (creation time matches with reception time), so it could be just you. Yep. Apparently it is. Not to worry. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 200

Re: digest mode problem

Peter- Friday, February 6, 2004, 5:31:21 PM, you wrote: PO> Checking the mail headers may reveal the problem. PO> Did you check them? Well, I didn't before, but now that I look at 'em, it appears that my ISP just held on to issue 18 for a few hours. The received times look fine all the way throu

Re: digest mode problem

Hello Mark Wieder, on Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:08:10 -0800 (2004-02-07 00:08:10 in .nl) in the message with reference <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you [MW] wrote (at least in part): MW> I'm having interesting symptoms today: my digest mode messages are MW> arriving out of sequence. TBU

Re: digest mode problem

Hallo Mark, On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:08:10 -0800GMT (7-2-04, 0:08 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MW> I'm having interesting symptoms today: my digest mode messages are MW> arriving out of sequence. TBUDL digest vol 183 issue 18 arrived three MW> hours after issue 19. Makes for quit

digest mode problem

Bats- I'm having interesting symptoms today: my digest mode messages are arriving out of sequence. TBUDL digest vol 183 issue 18 arrived three hours after issue 19. Makes for quite a disjointed reading experience. I checked the sending time, so it's not just me. Weird. -- -Mark Wie

Re: te daily digest format

On Wednesday, April 02, 2003, Fabian J. González Berger wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a > lot of mails, :-) > i would like see another order in the messages of the daily digest, > for

Re: te daily digest format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Fabian, @2-Apr-2003, 11:28 -0400 (16:28 UK time) Fabian J. González Berger said: > i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a > lot of mails, :-) > i would like see another order in the mess

te daily digest format

Hellow TBUDL arroba thebat.dutaint.com i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a lot of mails, :-) i would like see another order in the messages of the daily digest, for example today i recibed the next messages secuence: 1. Insert Template J

Digest command ... oops, sorry, wrong address

2003-01-24 , 00:09 , Sorry folks, instead of to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've sent this to the list :- -- Kind regards, Homesick Mac www.homesickmac.com Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUD

Re[2]: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Roelof- Here's what I use as a folder template for TBUDL in digest mode. This allows a reply just to the list and also allows the "reply-all" function to provide both a list reply and a personal one. It *is* the only folder template I've got and I wouldn't even use thi

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hallo Ochrid, On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:01:01 +0100GMT (10-1-03, 22:01 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Hope this helps OHE> If this arrives at the list without bothering my provider's OHE> postmaster, it did. Only had the ToAddress of the list in the header. One thing though, your name has

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hello Roelof, Friday, January 10, 2003, 6:50:34 PM, you wrote: RO> Hope this helps If this arrives at the list without bothering my provider's postmaster, it did. -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.61 op Windows XP _ Current version is 1.62

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

're doing now. I was curious how the tbudl messages in mime digest were arriving, so I subscribed for a second time to tbudl, but now in mime digest format. To be able to use a template for the list, you'll need to filter the list messages into a separate folder and you'll need a

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hallo Ochrid, On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:16:22 +0100GMT (10-1-03, 11:16 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: O> I do get the messages as attachments and am replying to your now, Maybe you ought to take care that you don't send the messages to the postmaster of xs4all as you're doing now. -- Groetje

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ochrid [O] wrote:' O> I do get the messages as attachments and am replying to your now, but O> I had to paste in the quote (F4 does not work in this mode) and add O> the TBUDL address manually. F4 should work, provided that the template you're using

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ochrid, @10-Jan-2003, 11:16 +0100 (10:16 UK time) Ochrid [O] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>I thought the TBUDL list allowed subscription to the mailing list >>as a MIME-Digest, meaning each mail comes as

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ochrid, @10-Jan-2003, 11:16 +0100 (10:16 UK time) Ochrid [O] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>I thought the TBUDL list allowed subscription to the mailing list >>as a MIME-Digest, meaning each mail comes as

Re[2]: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

>I thought the TBUDL list allowed subscription to the mailing list as a >MIME-Digest, meaning each mail comes as an attachement? If you subscribe >in that format, you can open each message, and reply to it individually, >instead of replying to blocks of messages. I do get the

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

> I receive the TBUDL messages in digest format. > > Is there a way to reply without having to start a > whole new message, as I do now? I thought the TBUDL list allowed subscription to the mailing list as a MIME-Digest, meaning each mail comes as an attachement? If you subscribe in

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hi Roelof, on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:44:01 +0100GMT (09.01.03, 19:44 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RO> F4 replies with only the selected text Oh, I see. Thanks! :)) -- Cheers Peter "He who shouts the loudest has the floor." Winamp currently playing: Man

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hallo Peter, On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:18:06 +0100GMT (9-1-03, 19:18 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: PM> Btw. I didn't know the F4 shortcut, I always use ctrl + F5, and I PM> find, that F4 will produce a reply according to my template, but PM> without the quotes part... Strange beast once again,

Re: how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hi Ochrid, on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:44:59 +0100GMT (09.01.03, 18:44 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : O> I receive the TBUDL messages in digest format. O> Is there a way to reply without having to start a O> whole new message, as I do no

how to reply to message in Digest TBUDL?

Hello all, I receive the TBUDL messages in digest format. Is there a way to reply without having to start a whole new message, as I do now? If I try to reply by hitting F4 or Ctrl R, the To: field will read: "So and so" on " What do I do? Add the list's addr

Re: digest mode problems

On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:38 PM, you wrote: PC>> well, yes it is. IF YOU USE THE MAIL TICKER, by double-clicking a new PC>> message. You will see ALL of your new messages, GROUPED by the folders PC>> they are in. Meaning each mail list will be grouped together. that way PC>> you can re

Re[2]: digest mode problems

Saturday, October 26, 2002, 3:57:02 PM, you wrote: PC> well, yes it is. IF YOU USE THE MAIL TICKER, by double-clicking a new PC> message. You will see ALL of your new messages, GROUPED by the folders PC> they are in. Meaning each mail list will be grouped together. that way PC> you can read all

Re: digest mode problems

On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 4:08 PM, you wrote: VN> -Original Message- VN> when you filter lists into folders, the folder name will show up, so you VN> know all the messages in that folder are from the same email list. I VN> have folders for TBUDL, TBTECH, TBOT... and other lists I'm

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Vishal Nakra [VN] wrote:' VN> Incredible. Just when I think I've got the hang of TB, it goes VN> and throws another dozen configuration options at me. I usually VN> like this, and I constantly fid

Re: Re: digest mode problems

-Original Message- From: Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when you filter lists into folders, the folder name will show up, so you know all the messages in that folder are from the same email list. I have folders for TBUDL, TBTECH, TBOT... and other lists I'm on. That's what I mean. I

Re: Re: digest mode problems

;. Yes, I use this all the time. So, to answer your question, you can setup the MIME digest list view to be consistent, but you can only do so if the MIME digests are within the same folder or if they are within folders, all of which share the same default column views. Thanks a lot! I really apprec

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <mid:1035657434.c153d160vishynakra@;myrealbox.com>, Vishal Nakra [VN] wrote:' VN> That's another thing I wanted to ask about. Is there any way to VN> make the view for the digest folder permanent? Opening up any of VN> t

Re: digest mode problems

On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 3:03 PM, you wrote: VN> Hmm..I usually do view messages by reference or subject line. I didn't VN> understand what advantage adding a column for folders would provide, VN> however, because at any point of time I'm only looking at the contents VN> of a particular f

Re: Re: digest mode problems

Not that I can see since the only way to open the digest is to double click on one of the messages and they aren't necessarily listed in the attachment pane in order by age. You can however, set up the digest view folder window to arrange the messages as you want. When you open the digest f

Re: digest mode problems

ssages without going the direct route at all. This is exactly the intention. This sort of digest is there to serve those who wish for the decreased traffic, mailbox clutter, and yet retain the ability to browse the list messages as if they were single messages. VN> However, I find that clicking

Re[2]: digest mode problems

PC> when I click on a message in the mail ticker, to view all the new PC> messages, they are nicely split up by account, folder, groups, and PC> threads. PC> If you don't do that yet, try this: PC> double-click the mail ticker to bring up the Browse messages window. PC> click the VIEW menu, selec

Re[3]: digest mode problems

Saturday, October 26, 2002, 6:51:29 AM, you wrote: MB> Hi Marck and Vishal, MB> Marck wrote to Vishal: MDP>> MDP>> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not MDP>> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have MDP>> instigated this reply. Please don

Re[2]: digest mode problems

should be, because I have no idea what position amongst all the messages the particular one that I clicked on is in. It could be somewhere in the middle of a conversation..or anywhere. Is there a way that I can open up the digest with the oldest message automatically displayed? Or a particular message

Re[2]: digest mode problems

Hi Marck and Vishal, Marck wrote to Vishal: MDP> MDP> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not MDP> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have MDP> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Vishal Vishal, I have been in your shoes. I k

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <mid:1589278221.20021026011313@;myrealbox.com>, Vishal Nakra [VN] wrote:' VN> Thanks! that should fix it. However, I feel that if you really VN> want the convenience of replying to individual emails, why VN> subscribe to the

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anne, @26-Oct-2002, 12:02 Anne [A] in mid:9955429858.20021026120206@;gmx.co.uk said: MDP>> There is a resurgence (every time I turn my back) of MDP>> top-posting. Please don't do this. It makes threads and MDP>> postings very hard to read. A> A

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vishal, @26-Oct-2002, 01:13 -0700 (09:13 UK time) Vishal Nakra [VN] in mid:1589278221.20021026011313@;myrealbox.com said: E>> However, if you want to read the digest as a continuous E>> document, simply use Specials/View Source. If

Re: digest mode problems

On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 4:13 AM, you wrote: VN> Thanks! that should fix it. However, I feel that if you VN> really want the convenience of replying to individual emails, why VN> subscribe to the digest at all? Viewing it this way just makes you VN> click a few more times and

Re: digest mode problems

Hello Vishal On Saturday, October 26, 2002, you wrote > Thanks! that should fix it. However, I feel that if you > really want the convenience of replying to individual emails, why > subscribe to the digest at all? Viewing it this way just makes you > click a few more times and prese

Re[2]: digest mode problems

Thanks! that should fix it. However, I feel that if you really want the convenience of replying to individual emails, why subscribe to the digest at all? Viewing it this way just makes you click a few more times and presents the same effect as not subscribing to the digest at all. -Vishal Friday

Re[2]: digest mode problems

HA1 JA> On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Vishal Nakra wrote... >> When I subscribe to TBUDL using the digest mode, the message shows >> up in the preview pane as a group of single messages, not as one >> combined message like digests usually do. To view the messages I had >> to

Re: digest mode problems

Hello Vishal On Saturday, October 26, 2002, you wrote > Hi, > I appreciate TB's power, but having to do special workarounds for > *every* little thing, such as reading a digest message properly, is > getting on my nerves. Actually, I like the digest when presented the way ment

Re: digest mode problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Vishal Nakra wrote... > When I subscribe to TBUDL using the digest mode, the message shows > up in the preview pane as a group of single messages, not as one > combined message like digests usually do. To

digest mode problems

Hi, When I subscribe to TBUDL using the digest mode, the message shows up in the preview pane as a group of single messages, not as one combined message like digests usually do. To view the messages I had to click on one of them, which opened up a separate window showing the individual messages

Re: digest and sig delimiter

Hello M! On Sunday, September 1, 2002 at 12:11:13 AM you wrote: > How did you solve this ??? Personally I solved it by not subscribing to digest. Another solution would be to not use the RTV (in which signatures are shown in another fashion than normal message body) but the PTV. -- Di

Re[2]: digest and sig delimiter (thanks)

he one". If everyone signed with a MDP> delimiter, there would be no problem. MDP> One solution could be to change the way signatures are displayed so MDP> that the message becomes more legible. MDP> Another idea is, as Ochrid suggested, to forward the digest to MDP> yourself

Re: digest and sig delimiter

e way signatures are displayed so that the message becomes more legible. Another idea is, as Ochrid suggested, to forward the digest to yourself with an extra signature at the end to divert TB's attention (you don't need an extra account to do this). You could complain on the list and

Re: digest and sig delimiter

On Monday, September 2, 2002, 11:07, M Sulchan Darmawan wrote: O>> "A possibility would be a filter that forwards the digest to another O>> of your accounts. Take care that the used forwarding template has a O>> correct signature delimiter at the bottom. O>> Sinc

Re[3]: digest and sig delimiter

Hello M, Monday, September 2, 2002, 11:07:34 AM, you wrote: MSD> then I should have another new account, should I ??? Yes, I think so. -- Regards, Ochrid _ The Bat! v1.61 op Windows XP _ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" informatio

Re[2]: digest and sig delimiter

dear... Ochrid, Ochrid, on Monday, September 2, 2002, 3:27:31 PM, you wrote: O> "A possibility would be a filter that forwards the digest to O> another of your accounts. Take care that the used forwarding template O> has a correct signature delimiter at the bottom. O> Since TB

Re: digest and sig delimiter

Hello M, Sunday, September 1, 2002, 12:11:13 AM, you wrote: MSD> i'm subscribed to a yahoogroups and i use digest mode for the group. MSD> The problem is when someone use the bat sig delimiter (dash dash space MSD> enter) and there are more than 1 message sent in the dig

Re: digest and sig delimiter

Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:11:13 PM, you wrote: MSD> dear people... MSD> i'm subscribed to a yahoogroups and i use digest mode for the MSD> group. The problem is when someone use the bat sig delimiter MSD> (dash dash space enter) and there are more than 1 message sent in M

digest and sig delimiter

dear people... i'm subscribed to a yahoogroups and i use digest mode for the group. The problem is when someone use the bat sig delimiter (dash dash space enter) and there are more than 1 message sent in the digest so the next message after this sig delimiter will be assume

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello David, On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 18:39:58 +0200, you wrote concerning 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': ... > So it seems that the digest information is causing TB! to fail to > extract the .msg files from the message. I have to correct myself here. It&

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

On 28 August 2002 at 17:39:58, David wrote: ... David> I did some further testing about this and I discovered the following: David> When I look at a digest message with source view (F9) I see the David> following: F9 yeah, thanks for reminding me. ... David> As you can see

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Januk, On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 22:08:36 -0700, you wrote concerning 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': ... > But to solve the more basic problem, are we sure that the digests > have the messages attached as .msg files and not .eml files? I don't > have

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Januk, On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 22:08:36 -0700, you wrote concerning 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': ... > It looks ok to me. The only thing I would add is the "wait for > program to complete" option when executing the command-line. Ok. I'll ad

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Julian, On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 at 08:52:41 [GMT +0100], you wrote: JBL> and trying to get the swing to "loop the loop" in my misspent JBL> childhood, so perhaps it is a good thing that are disappearing! JBL> Anyway, this is veering OT, so I had better stop now :-) Yep, this one is off-top

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 5:09:11 AM, Tim wrote: >>> Swings and Roundabouts is similar to what goes around comes around, >>> from memory... > Here are a couple of explanations I found on a quick Google search. [snip] Both swings and roundabouts are items of playground equipment, by the wa

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello David, On Tuesday, August 27, 2002 at 13:16 GMT +0200, a witness saw David Van Zuijlekom [DVZ] type: DVZ> Hello Januk, DVZ> On Sunday, August 25, 2002 at 23:08:23 -0700, you wrote concerning DVZ> 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': DVZ> ... >> A reminder

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

>> Swings and Roundabouts is similar to what goes around comes around, >> from memory... Here are a couple of explanations I found on a quick Google search. ,[ http://www.wordwizard.com/clubhouse/founddiscuss.asp?Num=2253 ] | From _Dictionary of Phrase & Fable, 16th Edition= (1995) | What yo

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 8:58:53 PM, Paul Duthie wrote: > Swings and Roundabouts is similar to what goes around comes around, > from memory... But it must refer to some other activity. In the US many such phrases refer to sports, particularly baseball and (US style) football, but also billia

Re[2]: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello all, None of them Swings and Roundabouts is similar to what goes around comes around, from memory... Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 11:45:21 AM, you wrote: DAC> On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 11:45:34 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: >> "Swings and roundabouts" DAC> You lost me on this on

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 11:45:34 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > "Swings and roundabouts" You lost me on this one. I usually have less trouble figuring out British slang than, or example, Australian. I suppose because my grandfather didn't leave the UK until he was in his 20s or 30s but I d

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

quick template which you apply each time you reply to a list message to be sent to the list. As a digest subscriber I'd assume that you wouldn't be as avid a participant as some of us and it wouldn't be too much of a hassle to just apply the relevant qt by just typing the h

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @27-Aug-2002, 22:41 +0700 (16:41 UK time) Thomas F. [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP>> We've queried the MailMan discussion group about this... TF> Ahem; not my business. But are we fixed on MailMan? Sorry if my

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Marck, On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:00:23 +0100 GMT (27/08/02, 22:00 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> We've queried the MailMan discussion group about this. It is an MDP> oversight. The community it comes from rather frown on lists that MDP> force reply-to's back to the list. I have no

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

sages. DVZ> Me neither. Right now you're forced to use folder templates if DVZ> you're on digest, because there is no Reply-To: header set. DVZ> I hope this can be changed, because I rather don't want to use DVZ> folder level templates. We've queried the MailMan dis

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Keith, On Sunday, August 25, 2002 at 13:36:26 +0100, you wrote concerning 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': ... > I don't think this is the case. I've seen no reply-to headers in the > attached messages. Me neither. Right now you're forced to use folde

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hello Januk, On Sunday, August 25, 2002 at 23:08:23 -0700, you wrote concerning 'TBUDL Digest and attached messages': ... > A reminder, this can be automated by a filter. The filter just needs > to export attachments to a temporary directory, and it needs to run > an extern

Re[2]: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

On 24 August 2002 at 21:05:00, Allie wrote: ... Allie> The digest is in MIME format, so you can reply to messages Allie> directly and the reply-to header is in each message within the Allie> MIME digest. I don't think this is the case. I've seen no reply-to headers in th

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @24-Aug-2002, 22:41 -0700 (06:41 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW> set tbudl digest That didn't work. Please follow the link at the bottom of this message to find out how t

Re: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

Hi Allie, On Saturday, August 24, 2002 at 15:05 GMT -0500, earthworms were entertained when Allie Martin exposed: > bursting your digest to a folder, i.e., just copy them all to a > storage folder and delete the digest. A reminder, this can be automated by a filter. The filter just ne

Re[2]: TBUDL Digest and attached messages

set tbudl digest Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: messages go lost since digest?

Hi Ochrid, on Thu, 8 Aug 2002 18:40:30 +0200GMT (08.08.02, 18:40 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : O> I will wait to see if this message will now show up before reposting my O> questions. If this is of any help, your message showed up here quite timely. -- Cheers Peter PGP

Re: ...digest...

> Just as a silly question, what has 16bit got anything to do with a > program being freeware? Well...wrong of me...I meant to express that an exe-file from QB is DOS and DOS sucks under XP etc...and I don't fanzy INI-files nor do I prefer 8+3 filenames á la "digest~1.

Re: DIGEST

Hi Peter, On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, at 14:30:10 [GMT +0200] (13:30 where I live) you wrote: PM> Hi Adam, AR>> Can someone review the links to change in and out of Digest - as you can AR>> see I had real fun with them yesterday! PM> Here you are: PM> I suggest you create an

Re: DIGEST

Hi Adam, on Sun, 4 Aug 2002 12:29:45 +0100GMT (04.08.02, 13:29 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : AR> Can someone review the links to change in and out of Digest - as you can see I AR> had real fun with them yesterday! Here you are: ,

Re: DIGEST

Hi Mark, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 21:02:38 [GMT -0700] (05:02 where I live) you wrote: MW> Hi back atcha. Sorry guys Can someone review the links to change in and out of Digest - as you can see I had real fun with them yesterday! A -- 04 August 2002, 12

  1   2   3   4   >