ncluding those on the BCC line, in
>> the encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
>> identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
>> other and to the other recipients.
>> Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has
>> been fixed in a lat
Hi
On Friday 28 November 2014 at 2:43:03 PM, in
, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Susanne sent me a PM with CC to the list, I don't know
> why it didn't make it to the list. Here it is:
[Snipped]
I received a copy via the list. It came in Susanne's "TSL handshake
failure" thread, and I posted a
l
>> recipients, including those on the BCC line, in the
>> encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
>> identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
>> other and to the other recipients.
>> Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been
>>
gt; identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each
> other and to the other recipients.
> Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been
> fixed in a later TB! version?
Sorry to reply to my own message, but can anybody confirm this
behaviour?
--
Best regards
MFPA
recipients.
Can anybody tell me whether this privacy issue has been fixed in a
later TB! version?
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
A bird in the hand makes it awfully hard to blow your nose
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Plan9,
On 11 August 2004, 15:22 -0400 (20:22 local time) Plan9 [P] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin>> Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin>> wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
P> I think what he is referring to is the name of the c
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:22:29 PM, Plan9 wrote:
Plan9> Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:12:59 PM, Martin wrote:
Martin>> Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin>> wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
Plan9> I think what he is referring to is the
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 3:12:59 PM, Martin wrote:
Martin> Is this a problem? You can see my machines FQDN is the header but I
Martin> wouldn't have thought that was a security breach.
I think what he is referring to is the name of the computer. See the
headers of this reply from me and notice
Hello Leif,
On 11 August 2004, 09:29 -0600 (16:29 local time) Leif Gregory [LG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W>> I 've done a test with a self sent email, and I can see this header
W>> ! My friend use TB to, but his mail I receive haven't his computer
W>> name in header !
W>> What 's wrong wi
Hello,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 12:10:36 PM, you wrote:
> I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an
> email to a person with my TB, this person can see my computer name
> in the headers of the mail. The problematic field is "Received:". I
> can accept that he can see my I
Hello WilWilWil,
11-Aug-2004 19:04, you wrote:
> The only one difference between them and me is that I 'm connected to
> Internet trough an other PC which share his connection...
There you have it. :-) I've seen similar on messages I've sent @ work vs.
messages I've sent from my home PC. The mai
==Original message text===
From: drifthat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 6:27:33 PM
Subject: Problem of privacy in TB ?
d> Hello WilWilWil,
d> Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 11:10:36 PM, you wrote:
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 11:10:36 PM, you wrote:
W> I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an email to a
W> person with my TB, this person can see my computer name in the headers of the mail.
W> The problematic field is "Received:". I can accept that he c
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 9:10:36 AM, you wrote:
W> I 've done a test with a self sent email, and I can see this header
W> ! My friend use TB to, but his mail I receive haven't his computer
W> name in header !
W> What 's wrong with my TB ?
It looks like you use your own SMTP
Hi,
I've got a big problem with mails sent with TB : When I send an email to a
person with my TB, this person can see my computer name in the headers of the mail.
The problematic field is "Received:". I can accept that he can see my IP address to
avoid
piracy, but why my computer name? Imagine, i
Chris wrote:
C> To set the recovery settings, log on as an administrator. Then,
C> open up the Services MMC snap-in. (Start -> Run -> "services.msc"
C> -> OK). Then scroll down until you find PGPsdkService. Double click
C> on it. Go to the "Recovery" tab. Then, set the recovery options you
C> want
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003 at 8:09:54 AM, daniel hahler wrote in the
message "PGP: No send if "Privacy/Sign When Completed" checked /
PGPsdkService crashed on exit"
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But as the service's start type is "automatic" it should
daniel hahler wrote:
dh> Ok. Thought of that already. What about setting it to manual?
dh> would it then be started if needed (and/or crashed before)?
No. That will not help. :/ XP will start particular services set to
manual as it needs to. One example is the service for Faxing. AFAIK,
most 3rd
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:18:28 -0500 Allie Martin wrote:
dh>> I then took a look at my XP Services and PGPsdkService was stopped,
dh>> but start type is automatic, of course..
AM> The automatic is for XP startups. The services set as automatic will
AM> be automatically started when you boot XP. Those
daniel hahler wrote:
dh> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was
dh> referring to the "re-implemented" bug, that a new mail gets not
dh> sent, if "Sign When Complete" is enabled. Simply nothing happens
dh> if you hit F2.
The reason is further down in your message, i.e., the PGPSDK Service
was no
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:48:00 +0100 Peter Meyns wrote:
dh>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
dh>> to the "re-implemented" bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if "Sign
dh>> When Complete" is enabled. Simply nothing happens if you hit F2.
PM> No problems in this respect with GnuPG on
daniel hahler writes:
> This is strange - so I would like to see, if it is happening to someone
> else with 2.02 CE..
I've had similar problems with 2.01, but nobody would ever believe me.
It is difficult to isolate the exact conditions in which it occurs.
Usually the message just doesn't get sen
Hi daniel,
on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:35:13 +0100GMT (09.12.03, 13:35 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
dh> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
dh> to the "re-implemented" bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if "Sign
dh> When Complete" is enabled. Simply nothing happe
Hello all,
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA I was referring
to the "re-implemented" bug, that a new mail gets not sent, if "Sign
When Complete" is enabled. Simply nothing happens if you hit F2.
Noticed that, when I wrote the above mentioned mail on TBBETA - but it
is not reproducable anymore -
In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
The Bat!
(X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0008.
<< OK >>
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:00:30 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK> In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
MK> Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
MK> The Bat!
MK> (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe&#x
One more reason for me to like the way TB! handles HTML:
http://www.havetheyreadityet.com
While the idea is probably good, I still like the idea of controlling
what people know about what I do. Although this does show you a
glimpse of what is capable of implanting into HTML email.
--
ò¸ó Nick
Hello azrael,
Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 12:55:42 PM, you wrote:
a> << The TBUDL *is* the beginners list. >>
a> I'd feared as much. I know there is a huge gap between my
a> awarenesses and those of say Nick A., Allie or Douglas and terms
a> like Regex, PGP, or XLAT are all new
Hello Marck,
<>
I use Azrael not for any concern with TBUDL but rather because I
post to hardware use-groups with munchkin hackers of dubious
repute and switch between groups and forums frequently. I'd screw
up and post more than I'd wish in the wrong place. Even
Opera-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Georg,
On 03 April 2001 at 17:48:57 -0400 (which was 22:48 where I live)
Georg Omenitsch wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
GO> Does anybody know how to set up TheBat! to work with PrivacyX?
GO> www.privacyx.com --It uses cer
Hello TBUDL,
Does anybody know how to set up TheBat! to work with PrivacyX?
www.privacyx.com --It uses certificates and I don't know how to set
up TheBat! to work with those.
Thanx,
Georg
--
Best regards,
Georg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat!1.52 Beta/3,W
Hello Kari,
Thursday, December 07, 2000, 6:54:58 PM, you wrote:
KJ> D'oh! I'm too fast for my keyboard... ;-) I know of an overclocking
KJ> tool for the PS/2 bus for the mouse but is there a. o/c'ing tool
KJ> for the PS/2 keyboard also? ...muahaha...
Maybe you could underclock yourself.
An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, at 23:02:41 h [GMT +]
you wrote this about "Folder-specific privacy settings?":
KJ>> This way you could disable "Sing when completed" by default.
NG> "Sing when completed"
Hello Kari,
Wednesday, December 06, 2000, 8:33:31 PM, you wrote:
KJ> This way you could disable "Sing when completed" by default.
"Sing when completed"? I like the sound of that (ouch!)
Oh - and thanks
--
Best regards,
Nickmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, at 20:10:28 h [GMT +]
you wrote this about "Folder-specific privacy settings?":
NG> Abject apologies if this is in the
NG> oh-no-not-that-old-question-again-why-don't-they-rtfm-or-at-l
Hello The Bat! users,
Nick Gordon wrote on 12/6/2000, 9:10 PM
NG> Is there a way to make privacy setting folder-specific. For example,
NG> most of the business email I send I want to PGP sign, so I have the
NG> "Sign when completed" option checked. But I don't want
NG
Good people (and knowledgeable too, I trow)
Abject apologies if this is in the
oh-no-not-that-old-question-again-why-don't-they-rtfm-or-at-least-the-FAQ-and-help-file
category, but:
Is there a way to make privacy setting folder-specific. For example,
most of the business email I send I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:08:38 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 23:08 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
>>> Make sure that under the
>>> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
>> I have seen this quite often in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
On 05 October 2000 at 17:53:58 GMT +0200 (which was 16:53 where I
live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
>> It's not like I'm emailing legal documents or an
On 05-10-2000 at 17:39, Gerd Ewald kindly wrote:
> Hello Karin Spaink !
>> Make sure that under the
>> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
> I have seen this quite often in this list and always wondered why ?? When I
> tested S/MIME and PGP I tried to sign my messages both ways and it did work:
I do
Hello Gerd
On 05 October 2000, at 16:39, you wrote:
>> -- Wait. Have you installed PGP?
GE> Great, Karin !! I just imagine this had been the error: ROTFLMAO !
Ho Ho
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
--
--
View the TBUDL arc
it still worth
> installing in your opinion?
It is, Jan ! IMHO it has to do with privacy: do you send anything written on a
postcard or don't you close the envelope ? If no and if you don't send illegal
things, why not on a postcard ?? Because it is your privacy !!
That&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:02:43 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 01:02 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> Make sure that under the
> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
I have seen this quite often in this lis
Hello Charlie Turner (ceejay),
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, October 05, 2000, 1:12:40 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
> Hello Graham
> On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
G>> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose
ecrypted by the secret key of the recipient and the public
key of the sender. Even the original sender can not decrypt
the message once it has been encrypted to the public key of
the recipient.
For more explanation of public key cryptography and PGP in
particular, see the comp.security.pgp FAQ or s
gt; Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
>> batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM>>> You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
>> Yep, no problem there.
ACM>>> Select the appropriat
wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP> of "privacy & encryption":
ACM>>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and
ACM>>> restart TB!.
CTc>> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc
Hello A
On 04 October 2000, at 23:52, you wrote:
ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:18:51 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc>> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc>> batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
A
y as TB!
ACM>> You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
> Yep, no problem there.
ACM>> Select the appropriate version and you should then have things working
ACM>> fine. This will be evidenced by new Privacy menu items appearing, ie,
ACM&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 04 October 2000 at 23:18:51 GMT +0100 (which was 23:18 where I
live) Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
ACM>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installa
0.dll. Make sure that
batpgp65.dll is in the TB! installation directory. You can forget the
others as I've done.
ACM>> You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
CTc> Yep, no problem there.
ACM>> Select the appropriate version and you should then
ation directory. Close and restart
ACM> TB!.
Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM> You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP Version menu item.
Yep, no problem there.
ACM> Select
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 21:49:12 +0700 re: Re[2]: privacy & encryption
Graham wrote:
TBUDL> Quite easily Jan. PGP is a tried and trusted form of encryption
TBUDL> which allows you to encrypt BEFORE your electronic mail goes
TBUDL> through
batpgp60.dll.
CTc>Also never having had the occasion to install .dlls before I could
CTc>do with some pointers. Any help greatly appreciated Graham.
Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and restart
TB!.
You may then go to the Tools | Privacy | Choose PGP V
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 20:11, you wrote:
CT(>> I've been looking around for the .dll Graham. Do you have the URL for
CT(>> it by any chance?
G> Certainly, Charlie, its
G> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
I've downloaded the PGP Plugin DLL 98k file (v5.5, v6.0 & v.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100
"Charlie Turner (ceejay)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CT(> Hello Graham
CT(> On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
CT(>
CT(> G> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version and check th
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
G> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version and check the radio button
G> for "PGP 6.x/6.5.x". You will have to download the .dll from the
G> Ritlabs web site as well, but it does work. As I understand it,
G> PGP 6.5.8
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 11:27:49 +0700 re: Re privacy &
encryption ClueBusDriver wrote:
TBUDL> The current version of pgp is 7. I tried it and found
TBUDL> numerous problems. NAI needs to make a few revisions before
TBUDL> it's worth in
cryption
which allows you to encrypt BEFORE your electronic mail goes
through a mail server. Privacy.com and other such services CLAIM
to ensure your privacy, but since THEY undertake the encryption,
how are you sure? Also, can you be sure of the encryption
algorithm they use? Is it easily cracked?
her than TB!
I've signed this reply via PGPtray-> Current Window-> Sign, because
Privacy-> PGP-> Sign Entire Text does nothing. I'm going to have to
spend some time looking into how I set up PGP to work with TB.
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
-BEGIN PGP S
Hello Jan,
Tuesday, October 03, 2000, 4:57:24 PM, you wrote:
JR> Hello BatListers,
JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
JR> service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
JR> of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current version of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 03 October 2000 at 16:57:24 GMT -0400 (which was 21:57 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
Hello BatListers,
Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current version of
PGP?
Regards,
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello Alexander and Batmans,
> As u know, of course, the license number includes in the body of bug
> reports message automatically.
> And about surprised... Yes, i'm registered user, but i consider some
> information in x- as my privacy. It's well known discussion a
uld ignore the message anyway (they might take
> the bug report under advisement and fix it, but they wouldn't let the
> "unlicensed" reporter know about it).
As u know, of course, the license number includes in the body of bug
reports message automatically.
And about surprised...
Hello all,
on Fri, 24 Dec 1999, at 23:43:42 local time (GMT -0700), Keith wrote:
> I, too, would like a translation or a brief readme.
Alex Sanyukovitch, the author, put an an english readme on :
http://members.tripod.co.uk/xraysoft
--
Rob ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
using The Bat! 1.38e
... Go th
Happy to help!
Tony
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said at 7:54 AM on 12/29/1999:
> btw ; i contacted the author of X-Ray about english documentation and he said
> he would translate the Russian docs. within the next few days ...
> he also asked if someone could proofread them. i could do it, but Engl
Hello Rob,
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 14:54:17 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 29, 1999, 8:54:17 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rob wrote:
Rob> [re: Maillita]
>> I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did
>> notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch.
[re: Maillita]
> I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did
> notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch.
yep, i noticed that too. some filenames in the package are Dutch.
also the Maillita homepage was with a Dutch provider (dds.nl).
> I wouldnt mind having a go thro
Hello Tony AT Mendina,
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:26:38 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 29, 1999, 3:26:38 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tony AT Mendina wrote:
Tony> I myself am the purveyor of a program that can suppress the serial
Tony> numberMaillita, at
Tony> http://mem
I myself am the purveyor of a program that can suppress the serial
numberMaillita, at
http://members.home.com/mendina/maillita.html
It has *extensive* documentation online at my website, and the
interface is richer than the x-ray one. Translation--to add a filter,
you press the "add a filter"
Hello, The Bat Users!
>>>Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
>> do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
>> package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
KR> Well, it certainly isn't English. I'm not about to run the executable
KR> without h
Dear Keith! (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In your message dated 25.12.1999 and concerning "How to suppress the S/N - was -
Re[2]: privacy" you wrote:
KR> Well, it certainly isn't English. I'm not about to run the executable
KR> without having any idea of what it will d
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Friday, December 24, 1999, 6:26:06 AM, Rob wrote:
>>Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
> do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
> package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
Well, it certainly isn't English
>Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutai
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:54:55 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote:
> ^^^
> You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December?
Sorting messages by received time, to the rescue. :
--
Ali Martin | U
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote:
^^^
You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December?
Regards
Dieter
...Don't stop at one bug.
|Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on |
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6|
--
Dieter Humm
Dear Andrew! (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In your message dated 23.12.99 and concerning "How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]:
privacy" you wrote:
AKL> Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
Yes - this one is good and very small.
--
Sincerely,
Denis V. Pe
Hello tracer,
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:30:05 +0700 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, December 23, 1999, 8:30:05 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
tracer wrote:
tracer> Hello Andrew K. Lovetski,
tracer> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:57:15 +0300 GMT your local time,
tracer> which was Thursday, December 23
Hello Andrew K. Lovetski,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:57:15 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, December 23, 1999, 2:57:15 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
Andrew> Hello, The Bat Users!
AM>> So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
write the e
Hello, The Bat Users!
AM> So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
Sure. You have to use some program for that (a kind of "transparent"
SMTP server - you tell The Bat to use it as your SMTP server and to
that program - to use your real SMTP server). I've heard about VPOP
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 14:39, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: privacy":
> SL>> He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
> SL>> headers.
>
> > Now that's what I call a mailer feature :-)
>
> *shrug* PM
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 23:39:24 you wrote:
SL> Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:11:53 PM, Oliver wrote:
SL>>> He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
SL>>> headers.
>> Now that's what I call a mailer feature :-)
SL> *shrug* PMM
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:11:53 PM, Oliver wrote:
SL>> He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
SL>> headers.
> Now that's what I call a mailer feature :-)
*shrug* PMMail2000 & PMMail/2 have been doing it for years with Rexx
calls. I prefer using P
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:57:04 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote:
[]
> Prologue:
> I happily own a cute little program called sr32 (Search&Replace)
> |-> you should have something similar to do the job <-|
[]
> There are probably other programs which will do the job also
> sufficiently.
I do ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:57:04 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Listmembers,
> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 at 16:22:46 [GMT -0500] Ali Martin wrote:
>>> Wasn't? Really?
>> Yeah who speaks in riddles.
>> Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledg
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 22:27:58 you wrote:
SL> Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:22:46 PM, Ali wrote:
>> Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
SL> He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
SL> headers.
Now th
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 at 16:22:46 [GMT -0500] Ali Martin wrote:
>> Wasn't? Really?
> Yeah who speaks in riddles.
> Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
It's quite easy and you may say 'this could have been my idea' :-). But
I only can tell about
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:27:58 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
> He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
> headers.
Ah.
Thanks Steve. I assumed as much but needed the clarification just to
be sure I wasn't missing something. He said it so fleetingly without
f
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:22:46 PM, Ali wrote:
> Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
headers.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:37:07 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> CR> can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
>>
>> CR> 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
>>
>> probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
>> filled in, as well.
> Actu
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:45:30 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote:
>> So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
> Yep! I use the outgoing filter section... it's not such a big problem
> :-)
Uhm. Is there something I'm missing?
>> I asked that some time ago and was told there w
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Dieter,
DH> Hello List Members,
DH> on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
>> I asked that some time ago and was told
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
> I asked that some time ago and was told there wasn't.
Wasn't? Really?
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
on a PPro200, 256MB EDO-RAM, UW-SCSI Disk Arr
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 18:37, Ali Martin wrote:
> So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
Yep! I use the outgoing filter section... it's not such a big problem
:-)
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT v
Hi Ali Martin,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:37:08 you wrote:
AM> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
AM> []
>>> I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
>>> identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
>> That is
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:02:39 you wrote:
>> Another thing is the serial number of the Pentium-III. This can be
>> checked while you're web browsing (I was told), and that *is* an
>> invasion of privacy. Actually a reason for me not
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 9:15:27 AM, Thomas wrote:
> I did visit www.m-w.com for "echelon", but still don't get your
> meaning. You want to go left and right of the other guys? Or of
> yourself? -- ?
From another message I sent out on another list, pardon the tone, it was
in a heated and
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
>> I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
>> identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
> That is *you*. *You* are not the totality of humanity. How about a
> political person in
ant to go left and right of the other guys? Or of
yourself? -- ?
>> Another thing is the serial number of the Pentium-III. This can be
>> checked while you're web browsing (I was told), and that *is* an
>> invasion of privacy. Actually a reason for me not to stick with Intel.
S
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
