On Thu 29-May-03 2:45am-0400, Jim D wrote:
On 5/28/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allie Martin said:
The auto-format option will not remove the extra spaces.
Do you mean Auto-wrap (Shift-CTRL-W)? Yes with this on, your spaces
will be preserved because it just wraps. But if you have to go
On Sun 8-Jun-03 9:59pm-0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Anyway, I'm still SOL on the S/MIME. Looks like we have run out of
things to check. So much for using S/MIME!
Before you quit, try one more time.
I found this process totally confusing. I double left clicked on the
certificate I received and
On Mon 9-Jun-03 10:29am-0400, Greg Strong wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, at 01:39:07 GMT -0400 (6/9/2003, 12:39 AM -0600 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BM Before you quit, try one more time.
OK, but this process is not documented anywhere. I may have missed it in
the scramble,
On Mon 9-Jun-03 12:31pm-0400, Jeanny House wrote:
How do I set up a filter for incoming mail that says, if the sender
is Michelle and the only recipient is Jeanny, filter to this folder
and a corresponding one for outgoing mail that says if the sender is
Jeanny and the only recipient is
On Mon 9-Jun-03 1:11pm-0400, Trevor Langford wrote:
SMN For the Office Rules there is a provision to Export to File,
SMN BUT the feature only allows for appending to an existing file
SMN or export to a file with a fixed path and name.
This is the one thing I do miss above anything
)On Mon 9-Jun-03 5:19pm-0400, Jeanny House wrote:
Monday, June 9, 2003, 1:33:12 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
Bill Since you need two conditions on the filtering strings, click
Bill Add. In the first field, type Jeanny's string. In the second,
Bill type Michelle's string and change location
On Wed 11-Jun-03 7:54am-0400, dajabo wrote:
The REGEX-BASED Macro collection
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/macros.html
offers the following string:
%quotes='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)((\s*)?\n?-BEGIN PGP %-
SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(%-
-*?\s*?--\s*\n|%-
On Thu 12-Jun-03 5:07am -0400, Graeme Adamson wrote:
I have the following in my standard reply template:
On %DOW %DATESHORT at %OTIME, you wrote:
However, I've noticed that the date that comes up is not the send date
and time of the message, but the time that I downloaded the message.
How
On Thu 12-Jun-03 7:02pm -0400, Csaba Kiss wrote:
snipped
Csaba, you seem to be having a few macro problems. (1) The `Re:` in
your subject line is not separated from the real subject. (2) You
appear to be deleting the In-Reply-To line in the Kludges - this
destroys threading (you also have no
On Thu 12-Jun-03 5:17pm -0400, Mark wrote:
MainSet: 40a.+,a.+,a.+,a.+,
AltSet:1: 40a.+ , a.+ , a.+ ,a.+ ,
AltSet:2: 40a.+, a.+, a.+, a.+,
AltSet:3: 40a.+,a.+,a.+,a.+,
Mark, wouldn't anything found by AltSet 1, 2 or 3 would also be found
by MainSet? Also, the docs aren't clear which PCRE
On Sat 14-Jun-03 7:39am -0400, Bob Morris wrote:
Until now I have not felt any need to apply a kill filter, but after
the recent spate of aggressive posts from one poster I want to
exclude him from the material I read.
Well, I'm fairly new hear too, but I've found that everyone here is
very
On Sun 15-Jun-03 6:31am -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
However, when you configure a filter to search
String: search string
Source: Sender
Presence: Yes/No
the filter actually searches the From header. The From header isn't
altered by the list server, so it
On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
ooh..look at me...I'm using folder templates :)
Anyways, I usually have my email sorted w/ threads.
Unfortunately, some webmail software doesn't use the
references header, so threads break. I can switch
back and forth between references and
On Tue 17-Jun-03 12:53am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16-Jun-2003 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
I believe that's already
Hello TB User Discussion List,
I like to use the keyboard to navigate. If I tab to the message list,
I can read email in the preview window and page down with the space
key. Is there any way to page up?
If I tab to the preview window, I can move up and down in the message,
but I can't move to
On Tue 17-Jun-03 8:19am -0400, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
Bill,
On 17-06-2003 13:50, you [B] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
B Also, is there any way to, with a single keystroke navigate to one of
B the 3 main windows?
TAB
Yes, I know about tab :-)
I mentioned using tab several times in the
On Tue 17-Jun-03 9:55am -0400, Nick Dutton wrote:
I use the Preview Pane Pop-up shortcuts which let me navigate
through the message list while focused in the preview pane:
Next unread Ctrl Alt Right
Previous unread Ctrl Alt Left
Next viewed Ctrl ]
On Tue 17-Jun-03 11:22am -0400, Wayne Black wrote:
Is there a way to hide the unread column in the accounts list? It
turns bold when there are any unread messages. This way I can pick up
a little more space.
Resize it to nothingness.
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Tue 17-Jun-03 11:44pm -0400, Anirban Das wrote:
I wanted to do conditional attachment in TB. I gave the following
command in the template
%if:%AbTOCountry=a:%attachfile=^d:\temp\acentres.xls^:%-
%if:'%AbTOCountry'='b':'%attachfile=^d:\temp\acentres-intl.xls^'
I am trying to do group
On Thu 19-Jun-03 7:03am -0400, DZ-Jay wrote:
Is there a way to modify the Subject line of an incoming message?
It is a fundamental design flaw in TB not to have pre-inbox filtering
- TB doesn't support it. I've checked out X-Ray and communicated with
the author - it doesn't support the kind
On Thu 19-Jun-03 8:50am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
What I want is all e-mail to him to be allowed only if the sending
address is in his address book. Any other mail should be routed to
me.
Will this work?
1. Turn on Inbox-Known filtering.
2. Set a filter on Inbox to forward (redirect?) all
On Wed 18-Jun-03 1:37am -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
It failed to attach the file, just like in your example. So confirmed
here.
BTW, I just tested conditional attachments in the Beta (beta/11) and
it works fine!
--
Best regards,
Bill
Whenever the wisdom of the world has clashed
On Thu 19-Jun-03 7:31pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, wrote:
I've checked out X-Ray and communicated with the author - it doesn't
support the kind for clean subject filtering I wanted to do either
but the author said he was planning to support a user written plugin
some day
On Fri 20-Jun-03 5:58am -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
How is it done?
There's more detail in the readme.txt file.
It supports the use of functions that can be used recursively.
Wow! Things have sure changes since I downloaded 0.1 on May 2nd.
Thanks for letting me
On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:56am -0400, Vishal wrote:
I'm not seeing the problems you've mentioned. In a new Incoming Mail
filter, inbox to inbox is already the default. Just add the name, the
filtering string, set your colors, flags, etc, set the option to
continue filtering and move the filter toward
On Fri 20-Jun-03 10:51am -0400, Leif Gregory wrote:
Is there any configuration in GPG that when I decrypt a message it
asks for the ID of the key to decrypt with. I'd think this should be
automatic rather than me having to remember my work key ID being
0x06C0AB16B and having to type that in
On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:26pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
BM I would still like to see Stefan add pre-inbox and pre-outbox
BM filtering within TB.
Yes, but X-Ray makes for a nice solution in the interim.
I used to dislike it as a solution for manipulating the X-Mailer header
but I've now discovered
On Sat 21-Jun-03 4:48pm -0400, Spike wrote:
I believe Pegasus checks accounts sequentially, while TB! checks all
concurrently!
My last email client offered a global choice for concurrent or
sequential. A better approach is to choose at the account level.
That way, as TB goes through the
On Tue 24-Jun-03 3:41am -0400, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
RA For example if the subject of the original message was Fwd: test,
RA then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA original returns : test.
AM .. as it should.
No it shouldn't. I
On Thu 26-Jun-03 6:13pm -0400, Coyle306 wrote:
Quoting from the Sorting Office window: The Known filter allows you
to separate incoming mail by the presence of the _sender's address_ in
your address book (My emphasis)
Right - notice that it does not say From address - it says Sender
which
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:34am -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
correct filtering event would have occurred...
Well I have to admit that I have my address in my Family
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:23am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:54 PM, Bill wrote:
I don't like the Know filter at all and don't use it because of its
bugs on replying from Inbox-Known.
What bugs?
There's an inconvenience (no folder templates). The bugs are related.
(1) It
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:44am -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
[..] I guess TB has a problem with multi-user XP?
I don't think so... I run it here just fine... and same on Win2k as
well.
Do you use separate mail stores for each XP user?
If you use a
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:09pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered
putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on,
sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some
external webmail accounts so I can see the
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:39pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
new thread ?
I think you're stuck with the method neurowerx outlined. Or, you
could modify a hot-key activate filter to remove the references and
in-reply-to
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:00pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method:
I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ?
ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta
Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and
some old QTs
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:31pm -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote...
Let me know if you want a summary of the changes in each of the
betas by private email.
Or read the respective text files in the same location
That's what my summaries are - those text
On Fri 27-Jun-03 11:06pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
BM I have AutoCompletion turned
BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me
BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like
BM to edit the outbox for testing.
Maybe I'm being dense today (it's
On Sat 28-Jun-03 2:44pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
SK Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor?
Euh I cannot find 'follow-up'. Do you mean in the message editor when hitting
reply ?
Yes, under view it's called Follow-up to in 1.62r. In the beta,
it's
On Sat 28-Jun-03 11:41pm -0400, Peter Ballantyne wrote:
... need to enlarge the font in the message list if I can ...
Options - Message List Colors and Font...
--
Best regards,
Bill
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
On Mon 30-Jun-03 9:59am -0400, Günter Minnerup wrote:
Active: 0
This filter is not active. That's fine for a Hotkey activated filter,
but will it not cause it to be skipped in a refilter operation?
--
Best regards,
Bill
Current version is
On Tue 1-Jul-03 4:22am -0400, TCOB1 wrote:
Sunday, June 29, 2003, 6:29:48 PM, you wrote:
TF On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 18:20:38 +0100 GMT (30/06/03, 00:20 +0700 GMT),
TF TCOB1 wrote:
Is there anyway to tell TB! not to download mail from a shared email
box.
TF Yes. Account / Sorting Office /
On Tue 1-Jul-03 1:12pm -0400, Mark wrote:
It is pretty easy to patch The Bat! to get rid of the X-mailer
header (see my mail) without using X-ray or anything else.
It's trivial to do it manually, but how do you do it automatically?
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Wed 2-Jul-03 11:07am -0400, Mark wrote:
BM On Tue 1-Jul-03 1:12pm -0400, Mark wrote:
It is pretty easy to patch The Bat! to get rid of the X-mailer
header (see my mail) without using X-ray or anything else.
BM It's trivial to do it manually, but how do you do it automatically?
You need a
On Thu 3-Jul-03 5:19am -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have tried many things, but my only explanation is that the number
of alternative triggers is limited, and 25 is above it. Can somebody
kindly try to replicate?
I created 50 alternative subject filters with:
For /L %i in (1,1,50) do
On Mon 7-Jul-03 5:31pm -0400, Mark wrote:
S I would suggest that a Quick Template triggered on SHFT / ALT or
S CTL-F9 to implement this action would be a good alternative. Those
S key combinations are not assigned in my TB!
OK, what would one put in this QT? I see a Clipboard Macro, but
how
On Tue 8-Jul-03 6:31pm -0400, Robin Anson wrote:
Thomas
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 3:34:54 AM, you wrote:
In the year or so that I have been using TB, I have noticed that
occasionally the autocomplete function fails to find an address book
entry. For instance, I may have an entry for
On Tue 8-Jul-03 10:18pm -0400, Robin Anson wrote:
In case it is useful - the group (called Rosetta) is in the address
book Current Projects and is set up to hide items if not explictly
selected. No other options are selected, the distinctive handle is
also Rosetta, and there are no group
On Wed 9-Jul-03 1:09am -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Tuesday, July 08, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote...
The address book Current Projects is the default address book,
right? I believe only the default is searched.
That is changeable in Options - Preferences - System. You can set it
to All
On Wed 9-Jul-03 3:05am -0400, Robin Anson wrote:
I have auto-completion set to All Addressbooks, and the AB search
finds address book entries in my Rosetta address book group, at least the
ones that don't exhibit the problem. And before you ask, the entries
in the group are not found in any
On Sun 13-Jul-03 5:59pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
7za u -ms=off x:\TBArchives\tbMail7z.7z -up0q0r2x1y2z1w2 AppsBase\MAIL\* -r
Why use 7za? From the manual, 7zn.exe and 7zan.exe are optimized
versions of 7z.exe and 7za.exe for execution on Windows NT/2000/XP.
Aren't you running XP?
Also, why
On Tue 15-Jul-03 12:52pm -0400, MikeD wrote:
The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and they are
spoofing your address so that (assuming, presumably, that you list
yourself in your address book g) it is not as clear as it was. I
recently had to take my address out of my
On Tue 15-Jul-03 1:08am -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Monday, July 14, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
7za u -ms=off x:\TBArchives\tbMail7z.7z -up0q0r2x1y2z1w2
AppsBase\MAIL\* -r
Why use 7za? From the manual, 7zn.exe and 7zan.exe are optimized
versions of 7z.exe and 7za.exe for execution
On Tue 15-Jul-03 7:07pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
So don't specify a new archive and p0q0 is equivalent to p1q1.
NO, not when you consider what my INTENT on the backup was. See
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My test the other day must have been wrong
On Tue 15-Jul-03 10:35pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
What is the size of the source files you are backing up, and how long is
it taking?
The used space is about 75 meg. Compressed is about 15 meg. There
are 827 files. On my 800 mhz P-III it updates in about 80 seconds.
The builtin TB backup
On Wed 16-Jul-03 3:56pm -0400, MAU wrote:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Wed 16-Jul-03 4:37pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
BM Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM returned?
BM I know Sender
On Wed 16-Jul-03 5:22pm -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 4:31:36 PM, Bill wrote:
B I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and
B Return-Path: but I didn't find a definitive list. Have I
B missed any?
I checked the spams that leaked through and they all have my
On Wed 16-Jul-03 5:15pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
Well I'll have to back and look at your settings to see if I can set
something up to track. It would be interesting.
For a reference here's the command to compress my main mail store with
7z and zip (redirection for 4nt):
7zn u -ms=off
On Wed 16-Jul-03 7:01pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
What is the reason? - If you keep BBC'ing yourself, you type your own
address into the BBC field once, and the history function will always
autocomplete (faster than
On Fri 18-Jul-03 5:37am -0400, Alexander wrote:
18-Jul-2003 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?
Thats in Tools / OpenPGP / OpenPGP preferences, first tab, first checkbox
always
On Thu 17-Jul-03 9:53pm -0400, Rafi Avital wrote:
Using TB 1.62r and GnuPG 1.22 Windows 2000 SP2.
Is there a way to encrypt to myself from within the editor in TB when
I select the Privacy|OpnePGP|Sing$Encrypt...?
Do I have to add myself to the recipient list in order to accomplish
that?
On Fri 18-Jul-03 1:00pm -0400, Mary Cassidy wrote:
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. ...
Now why didn't I think of that?
The BCC approach will work fine but is a bit impersonal. Why not just
use the mass mailing feature to individually address
On Fri 18-Jul-03 7:04pm -0400, Rafi Avital wrote:
I have several questions as I am evaluating TB for my use. Many
thanks in advance to anyone who can answer.
Using TB 1.62r, Win 2000 Pro SP2, GnuPG 1.2.2.
1. The only way to encrypt to myself is to add myself to the
recipient list. This
On Mon 21-Jul-03 6:04am -0400, Peter Ballantyne wrote:
If a message requires further action from me I usually use the
little red flag to flag it for attention. What I am wondering is
this - is there a way to make a folder show that there is a flagged
message in it, perhaps by having the
On Mon 21-Jul-03 2:56pm -0400, ChaKy wrote:
I have a little problem with filters, I have made one Rule with just one
String in it, and it was warking OK. Then I have added one more string
in that Rule, and now, it looks like this:
Strings:Location:
On Mon 21-Jul-03 5:46pm -0400, Steve M. Sawczyn wrote:
DK This pisses me off with TB too. In all mail clients before TB, I
DK sorted my mail by time of arrival - time of arrival on server. If I
DK sort in any other way, by time created or by time received, I always
DK seem to read replies to
On Tue 22-Jul-03 11:43am -0400, Steve M. Sawczyn wrote:
Monday, July 21, 2003, 10:29:21 PM, you wrote:
TF Compressing means that the messages that are marked as deleted will be
TF actually taken off the message base.
I guess I'm confused in that there's also a trash folder -- are
deleted
On Wed 23-Jul-03 5:00pm -0400, Ricardo Marte wrote:
RMR I would suggest that you add this request to the Bugtrack database (in
RMR the wishlist) but not as a rectification of the received time,
RMR because I think that it's ok as it is now. I would ask for a third
RMR Timestamp column in the
On Thu 24-Jul-03 4:40pm -0400, Deborah W wrote:
You know what I'd like to see in TB? A way to check *some* email
accounts without checking all of them, without checking each
individually.
What I mean is this: let's say you have 20 email accounts set up in TB,
you want to check 7 of them,
On Thu 24-Jul-03 3:20pm -0400, Steve M. Sawczyn wrote:
#2 I click on the little icon next to the to: field which
opens up the addressbook (the screen reader has special
commands which enable me to manipulate the mouse pointer to
icons).
How does one get to the address book picker from the
On Thu 24-Jul-03 9:06pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
BM How does one get to the address book picker from the keyboard? I've
BM looked around and don't see a way.
Shift-Enter will get you there.
Fantastic! Thanks, Allie - I guess I missed that in my search.
--
Best
On Sat 26-Jul-03 9:54pm -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
BM How does one get to the address book picker from the keyboard? I've
BM looked around and don't see a way.
Press the Enter when you are in the address field and the field is
empty. When the field is not empty, press Shift Enter (it's
On Sun 27-Jul-03 3:29pm -0400, Jos Klaassens wrote:
All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
accounts. Tried sender, kludges
On Sun 27-Jul-03 3:57pm -0400, Paul Smithson wrote:
I've been using The Bat with very few problems for years now and then
today my machine crashed. When I restarted it all the subfolders have
vanished. They're still in the directory structure on my hard drive
and have the appropriate files in
On Sun 27-Jul-03 5:05pm -0400, Alexander wrote:
The main set is always AND. You won't receive an email that contains all
of the addresses you've specified.
You have to specify the other addresses on the Alternatives tab with the
Add set button. It will look like...
MainSet: [EMAIL
, No and Yes.
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
However, if instead I have: bill mccarthy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not get recipients with both bill mccarthy AND
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. For that, I can
On Mon 28-Jul-03 6:13am -0400, MAU wrote:
If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll get any recipient that contains bill mccarthy or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string bill mccarthy OR string
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you get a match
it to work as a concatenation operator. I sent an
email to myself and filtered for a sender of bill mccarthy (without
the quotes) - it did not work. Can you provide an example that
demonstrates your theory?
--
Best regards,
Bill
Current version
On Mon 28-Jul-03 3:40am -0400, Colin Turner wrote:
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve any beneficial purpose to sort the filters according
On Tue 29-Jul-03 6:03pm -0400, Michael Thompson wrote:
If I have more than one address on the To: line, what macro can I
use to replace the Hello [Name], which defaults to the first
recipent with a generic text such as hello people,
How about something like this:
On Tue 29-Jul-03 7:56pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
What's wrong with ACCOUNT.LOG? There's enough info there to grab the
filters passed and the location moved for each message. For my setup,
I generally figure about a half K per message - so a 200k log limit
(account-]properties-]options
Hello TB User Discussion List,
AB Handles expand fine in To, CC and BCC. They fail to expand in the
From field. Bug?
--
Best regards,
Bill
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Wed 30-Jul-03 8:55pm -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
BM AB Handles expand fine in To, CC and BCC. They fail to expand in the
BM From field. Bug?
Missing feature :-)
Yes, that sounds better. But please fix it after the release of the
next beta.
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Wed 30-Jul-03 8:17pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:20:48 -0400 GMT (31/07/03, 02:20 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
AB Handles expand fine in To, CC and BCC. They fail to expand in the
From field. Bug?
No, I think it's by design. There is also not AB icon
On Thu 31-Jul-03 10:08am -0400, daniel hahler wrote:
[Yours (and my modified version) produces]:
on Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:08:07 +0200 you wrote:
--+
%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*(.*)%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS
on %SUBPATT=1 you wrote:
--+
On Thu 31-Jul-03 2:36pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@31-Jul-2003, 13:45 -0400 (18:45 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to daniel:
BM On %ODate=ddd d-mmm-yy %OTime=h:mm''am/pm -0400,
... snip
BM The downside is that I need to change the offset twice a year
On Thu 31-Jul-03 4:05pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@31-Jul-2003, 15:23 -0400 (20:23 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
BM I would like to programmatically have my local offset change.
BM But now I manually change between -400 to -500 twice a year. The
BM
On Fri 1-Aug-03 1:07pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
Thursday, July 31, 2003, 5:43:10 PM, you wrote:
BM What we could use is for Stefan to call GetTimeZoneInformation and
BM give us access to a %Standard or %Daylight macro.
GetTimeZoneInformation only returns information about the current
system
On Sat 2-Aug-03 10:42pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Allie Martin, [AM] wrote:
AM Hmmm. Upon fiddling with v1.62r, I see what you mean. You can navigate
AM to that option using the keyboard
I actually meant there that you cannot navigate to the option using the
keyboard.
Try the following:
On Sat 2-Aug-03 8:52pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
GetTimeZoneInformation only deals with the Right Now time and
there's no way to plug any other date information into it.
I understand. I rarely reply to email that isn't from today or
yesterday. There would only be 2 days a year that my offset
On Sun 3-Aug-03 12:28am -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Though your message header says that you're using v1.62r, your keyboard
navigation path is the one for the new options panel seen only in the
betas.
Yes, I accidentally tested that from the Beta. I also didn't see a
way to get there in the
On Thu 7-Aug-03 9:17am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
I want to run an external program for e-mail just before they are
sent. TB! appears to be trying to send the e-mail before the
external program is run. How can I debug this? The log file
doesn't provide any detail.
Right, the output filter is
On Mon 11-Aug-03 6:57pm -0400, Samson wrote:
DG Hello %ABOFromFirstName %ABOFromLastName
this works perfectly. appreciate.
Hmm, what if the address wasn't in your book? How about:
Hello %ABoFromName=%oFromName
i searched over the help file and macro list, couldn't find any
references
On Wed 13-Aug-03 8:41am -0400, Lex Thoonen wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy having switched from outlook to the bat, but now I need a
good calendar/diary/agenda programme.
Any suggestions?
I've used WinDates for years and like it as a calendar and
appointment/event reminder. It's not a PIM and not
On Tue 12-Aug-03 9:36pm -0400, daniel hahler wrote:
on Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:59:41 -0400 Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM If you want to use your original template, I don't see why you want to
BM change the To field.
Because I hit reply, but don't want the mail to be sent to me, but to
the original
On Tue 12-Aug-03 6:05am -0400, Lex Thoonen wrote:
Could I change the RE: into something of my own language? Is there a
macro somewhere? (haven't found one yet)
Just change Re: to whatever you like in your Clean Subject qt.
As well, what does the numbering exactly do, when it says RE(3): for
On Tue 12-Aug-03 8:15am -0400, daniel hahler wrote:
I've created a QuickTemplate that I use, when I have to send a note to
a already sent mail:
.-[ Paste ]-
|
| %Subject='note: %Subject'
| %TO=
| %IF: %OToName%OToAddr:%TO='%OToName %OToAddr':%TO='%OToAddr'
|
'---
On Sat 23-Aug-03 12:38am -0400, Joseph N. wrote:
On Friday, August 22, 2003, Dennis W. Greer wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DWG Is it possible to park a collapsed thread.
You can probably set up a hotkey, though.
Please explain how.
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Tue 26-Aug-03 8:06pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
DWG Is it possible to park a collapsed thread.
You can probably set up a hotkey, though.
Please explain how.
In folder view Alt+F12 | Expand Messages | Expand Thread | Select Park
and hit the hotkeys you want. You probably want to set up
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
