Hi,
It looks like Synergy makes some really nice devices. Actually, I now know
first hand that they do. I'm sure their module would be an excellent choice
for some applications.
I've made some progress on my own REF-0 project and the Denuo GPS board.
I've also decided to expand the scope and
On the new board, I would add a header for GPS TXD/RXD/PPS/PWR/GND to make it
easy to play with different GPS modules...
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Bob -
Thank you for reference to the Synergy SSR-6T.
I talked to Gina at Synergy early today.
The Synergy SSR-6T is still available, but now at the regular price of
$68.20
The Synergy SSR-6T GPS receiver would likely not be appropriate for usage in
the Lucent KS-24361,
since it does
Hi
The (likely) biggest issue with the M12 clone boards is that they are
12 channel. The report strings have more satellites in them than the
old 8 channel boards did. That’s going to mess up the parsing algorithms
if you want the REF-0 to work with all the data (record the sat info vs
ignore
selling their
older SSR-6Tr boards at a discount as they update their product line. I
haven't tried this out, though.
Bob - AE6RV
From: Gregory Beat <w...@icloud.com>
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
I went back to the Time-Nuts archives, and noted that a modern GPS receiver to
replace the Motorola Oncore UT+ (8-channel, timing) in the HP Z3801A was
discussed 3 years ago (Sept, 2012).
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-September/070132.html
Bob Camp suggested something like a
Hi
At that time (and today) a 3801 is a “well over $300” sort of box at auction.
The REF-0 box hovers between $25 and $40 depending on
the direction the wind is blowing. Cost does matter …. What makes sense on a
$800 gizmo probably does not make sense on a $80 stitch
up project.
Yes you
There are a number of uBlox modules (6 to 8 series; and sizes) that are hitting
the surplus venues, I saw some LEA-6T in the $30 to $50 price range as well as
newer 8-series.
Since the PCB is being designed for the NEO size/footprint I'll look at
what is available in surplus.
g. beat
nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Gregory
> Beat
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:07 PM
> To: time-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
>
> Dan -
>
> I have been following your experimentation with the surplus Luce
Hi
There are a number of papers out there (check the NIST archive) on GPS vs
Gloanss
timing. The simple answer at this point is “don’t bother”.
Bob
> On Oct 3, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>
> kb...@n1k.org said:
>> The main thing you get with the 7’s (vs
tter.
> >
> > Disclaimer: I haven't studied RAIM (or TRAIM) enough to know exactly
> > what goes on, but that's the behavior I've observed.
> >
> > Bill Hawkins
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun.
kb...@n1k.org said:
> The main thing you get with the 7âs (vs the 5 and 6) is the ability to
> switch over to Glonass. With the 8âs you get the ability to run Glonass plus
> GPS at the same time. In both cases, you get nothing from the Glonass
> constellation thatâs worth the switch. In a
Dan -
I have been following your experimentation with the surplus Lucent KS-24361
REF-0 module, to transform it into a standalone GPSDO.
The original usage of the classic Oncore UT+ GPS receiver for KS-24361 REF-1,
by Symmetricom / Datum for Lucent, was deliberate.
For usage at a cellular
] On Behalf Of Gregory
Beat
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:07 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Dan -
I have been following your experimentation with the surplus Lucent
KS-24361 REF-0 module, to transform it into a standalone GPSDO.
The original usage
Gregory,
Thanks for your comments. You are absolutely right that a timing GPS module
is required to make this a proper Time-Nuts solution. I know that many on
the list have been thinking the same thing when they read my posts. Cost
alone is what has prevented me from going directly to that
Hi
Given that eBay is awash in various older uBlox devices at really low prices,
going for the > $200 a unit single piece price of the LEA-8T seems a bit much.
You get all of the core timing functions in the “not T” parts (including
sawtooth data). The main thing you get with the 7’s (vs the 5
Hi,
Here's a little progress report on my REF-0 project. Though there hasn't
been a lot of activity in this thread recently, I do hope that some more
people have successfully gotten their REF-0s up and running.
My goal all along has been to retrofit a modern GPS into the REF-0. Over
the past
To add a note to this fine conversation.
I have built up several different arduinos to drive the REF 0s using Dans
program. They all worked and the last unit is the postage stamp size
arduino mini.
Interestingly its close to the same form factor as the ublox neo6 I have
been using. A $11 wonder.
Thanks for doing these write-ups.
I've bought several units from the US supplier with the intention of
getting shipping down to a sensible level, and have a lash-up based on your
article which has had all the first few running. They won't lock to
anything far off 1pps so need a properly working
All,
I hope some more of you have had luck getting your REF-0s running
standalone.
My earlier write-ups were focused on the bare minimum connections and code
needed to make a REF-0 work. Of course, external connections are not ideal
for long-term operations. The real end-state here is to have a
I also did a quick write up recently about how I added the 10MHz test point
output to my REF-1.
Hi Daniel
Many thanks for your 10Mhz write up for the REF-1, that's very interesting
and a nice bit of detective work.
Back in January I took a quick look at the underside of a REF-1 board
Nigel, this is very useful. Thanks.
I don't particularly like how the 10MHz test point signal is generated. I made
my modification easily reversible so that I could change it when I found a
better way. I will explore the area you describe in your notes.
Best regards
Dan
On Aug 15, 2015, at
HI
The phase noise and spur plots I posted earlier on the 10 MHz out of the REF-0
are
at least as bad on that test point.
Bob
On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:48 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
wrote:
I also did a quick write up recently about how I added the 10MHz test point
All,
I have posted some example code for running the REF-0 standalone. There is
an Arduino sketch and some AVR C code. (Just in time for the weekend)
http://syncchannel.blogspot.com/2015/08/example-code-for-ks-24361-ref-0.html
I also did a quick write up recently about how I added the 10MHz
Hi
If you are in a hurry, the ever popular guys like Mouser, Digikey, Farnell, and
RS
all sell both the 9 pin and 15 pin connectors that mate up to the KS boxes. You
are
indeed correct that in bulk, the Chinese outfits have really attractive prices.
Just the
connector body for the the same
Bob
OK my favorite places to start and order from are Mouser and Digikey. Not
to go off track here but as of late both sites don't return what you are
asking for. The datasheets are often inaccurate or not there.
This connector was indeed one of those strange events. Oh no problem always
returning
OK I can contribute at least something.
Given the popular REF1 thread. Ebay has some 15 pin connectors that appear
to be whats needed 10 for $3.49 shipping from China makes it $5.50. The all
sell singles at 99 cents.
I ordered a set today and should see them in several weeks.
Granted they are not
Re the Ref-0 Ref-1 difference. Might be easier to find in the difference
between PForth dumps? R0 and R1 may simply be differences in words?
Don
Bob Camp
Hi
Yes, Paul posted a link yesterday that includes a link of the words dump from
pForth.
Bob
On Aug 9, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Don Latham
Hi Adrian,
I've recently ordered two pairs to go with my earlier REF-1 units and found
there was quite a significant saving on postage, even with the original
packaging which I decided was a safer option, but don't forget there's a
very high chance these days that you'll get hit with VAT
Hi,
for use in audio setup we got some Ref-0. The audio project was quit
(the better is the enemy of good ,-).
Please contact me directly rather than via the list if you're interested
in one or more (50 EUR each + shipping costs within EU).
Ulli
Am 12.08.2015 um 01:16 schrieb Bob Camp:
These seem a good deal but the shipping price to the UK puts me off a bit -
it's 3 x the price of the unit.
I've looked into shipping a number of them to get a better rate and it
seems worthwhile. I'm happy to sell them on to time-nuts at cost (will
include shipping and duty) and ebay the
Hi
I suspect that postage throughout Europe would be much better after a bulk
transit over the ocean. The units are already (or maybe better put still)
packed in
air shipping boxes with “Korean Air” tags on them. The seller then re-boxes
those
inside another box. I would not have any real fear
I've ordered some. Please contact me directly rather than via the list if
you're interested in one or more. The seller will repackaged them to reduce
shipping so they won't be boxed quite as advertised but should be good
enough.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
Yes, Paul posted a link yesterday that includes a link of the words dump from
pForth.
Bob
On Aug 9, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:
Excellent. The words can be dumped to give a better idea about what's going
on?
Bob Camp
Hi
Dan
A really nice blog even with colored dots on the pins. Can't get much
better then that. Fantastic on the strings that are needed to keep the Ref
0 happy and there timing.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
Yes, Paul posted a link
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction information.
The signal
spreading
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction information.
The signal
spreading (at the time
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Camp
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom
Camp
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction
Am 09.08.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Pete Lancashire:
100% 2nd the thanks to all.
OMG. 27 bytes of good technical content in a 19.7 KBytes message with 13
levels of citing.
Please, everybody, snip the context that is no longer needed.
regards, Gerhard
: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the
SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction
, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction information
[mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Camp
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
All,
I have completed a write-up on how to make the REF-0 run standalone. As
there is a lot to cover, I decided to split it up into two (or more) parts.
This first part summarizes what is required on the interface pins, and
details what I have discovered about the serial string timing. If you
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Camp
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction information. The
signal
spreading (at the time they were designed) was just to great to make it worth
playing with. I have no authoritative source for that,
On 08/06/2015 07:27 PM, Edesio Costa e Silva wrote:
Had anyone managed to run the KS-24361 REF-0, the one without GPS, as a
standalone unit? If so, can you provide some links on how to configure it?
I have two REF-0 units spare: at $25, the Milliren OCXOs are treasures.
I am configuring them
Hi
It’s a good bet that the REF-1 is set up to allow a hot swap of the REF-0 unit.
In a
cell site, you would not want a working REF-1 to go down when you replaced a
blown REF-0. You would *think* that the same logic applies to a REF-1 booting
up initially. For what ever reason, it does not
: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
(this is one of them) did not use the sawtooth correction information
Hi
Given my history of mentioning this sort of thing on the list, the listing
will be gone before this makes it past the poor suffering list server.
The REF-0’s still showed up at $25 each or $50 for a pair ( = better net
shipping)
last time I looked. I agree that even without being able to
[mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Camp
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
As far as I know, the Symmetricom / HP designs that were done in the SA
era
Yes, I'm hoping that it just wants a dummy string to say GPS is ok, and doesn't
actually use any information in it. If that's the case, code can be developed
for PIC and AVR that will work for just about anyone, using a ~$1 chip.
Even if the string does need to contain real GPS info, it should
Hi
Here’s a quick and dirty approach to getting a Z3812A, KS-24361 L101, RFTG-u,
Ref-0 box
up and running on it’s own.
==
First P1 the +24VDC input. It’s a male 9 pin connector. The pins are all
labeled on the connector.
The numbers are small, but they are
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:06 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking forward to the notes.
Yes it could be fairly simple if what ref 0 wants is a string that
essentially says the system is fixed with 3 d accuracy. Perhaps after that
the ref 0 makes no checks other then the string keeps
Dan exactly my thinking.
I will guess it wants the string that says I have a 3d position lock.
Something like @@ and 30-40 characters that would be fixed.I think there is
a CRC at the end. But all of the message can be copied from a real oncore
or simply monitor what comes out of the KS GPS unit.
Looking forward to the notes.
Yes it could be fairly simple if what ref 0 wants is a string that
essentially says the system is fixed with 3 d accuracy. Perhaps after that
the ref 0 makes no checks other then the string keeps coming with the
correct quality. Not to push a particular proc but any
-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
Ok, I will write something up and post it here. It will probably take a few days
to get it all into a form that answers most of the questions.
What you will need:
1) A working REF-0
2) A PIC or other micro to get things going
3) A GPS with a PPS output (any
Hi
You need to get the Oncore running with the correct position locked in and
spitting out the right strings.
That’s all done by the CPU in the REF-1 unit. The REF-0 simply grabs the data
off of the string
as it comes by.
I’ll see if I can dig out the information and send it to you off list.
Hi
People got a bit “excited” about the level of KS box discussions. All of the
work decoding
the 15 pin connector and how to drive the REF-0 was taken off list.
Simple answer:
Yes you can run a REF-0 by it’s self. It needs a dummy string that looks like
the output
of a Motorola Oncore to
Thanks.
I have some Motorola Oncore available.
Can you detail this fairly simple manipulation of the signal lines?
Regards,
Edésio
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:57:20PM -0400, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
People got a bit ???excited??? about the level of KS box discussions. All of
the work decoding
Bob there is enough interest you may want to resend it here.
Just a thought.
Paul
WB8TSL
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Graham planoph...@aei.ca wrote:
Bob,
I would like that information too please and thank you.
I have a pair that is working quite well and I also have a second REF-0
that
Hi Bob,
I also grabbed some of the KS-24361 pairs and retrieved a
lot of information from the mailng list archive.
If you have more results from the reverse engineering which
was already done, I´d also be very interested.
Thanks,
Matthias
Hi
You need to get the Oncore running with the
Hi
Ok, I will write something up and post it here. It will probably take a few days
to get it all into a form that answers most of the questions.
What you will need:
1) A working REF-0
2) A PIC or other micro to get things going
3) A GPS with a PPS output (any will do)
4) Code specific to your
of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] KS-24361 REF-0 standalone
Hi
You need to get the Oncore running with the correct position locked in and
spitting out the right strings.
That’s all done by the CPU in the REF-1 unit. The REF-0 simply grabs the data
off
Bob,
I would like that information too please and thank you.
I have a pair that is working quite well and I also have a second REF-0
that I want to start testing but just haven't got round to it yet to
figure out what is needed.
cheers, Graham ve3gtc
On 2015-08-07 02:39, Bob Camp wrote:
Hello Fellows!
Had anyone managed to run the KS-24361 REF-0, the one without GPS, as a
standalone unit? If so, can you provide some links on how to configure it?
The reason to try this is cost. The REF-0 unit costs USD 25 + USD 52.30
(shipping to Brazil) and I have to pay the same amount as
66 matches
Mail list logo