I'm sorry, but can't remember - why do we still need the endorsed ?
I tought they were a temporary solution for JDK1.4 and some validation
problems - tomcat should work fine with any SAX/DOM parser, including
the one in JDK1.4.
The only problem is JDK1.3 - and I agree that it would be better to
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The time is mostly parsing web.xml. However, it's nothing when
compared to starting certain webapps (such as the admin webapp),
where *one* webapp takes more time than starting up the rest of
Tomcat (including all the simple webapps, JMX and the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andy Mudrak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads
Hi,
I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted
correctly. I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andy Mudrak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads
Hi,
I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted
correctly. I specifically downloaded the
mturk 2004/08/10 02:33:33
Modified:webapps/docs setup.xml
Log:
Added link to WIndows-service-howto.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +4 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/setup.xml
Index: setup.xml
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
A TOMCAT_5_0 branch was created at the time 5.0.27 was released. I'm
not gung-ho about making significant Tomcat 5.0 additions and
enhancements, given the advanced state of Tomcat 5.1 development. If
there's a showstopper, security, or spec-compliance bug than of course
mturk 2004/08/10 04:10:26
Modified:catalina/src/bin service.bat
Log:
Set the JVM to reflect the set JAVA_HOME.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +12 -4 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/service.bat
Index: service.bat
mturk 2004/08/10 04:15:58
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe
Log:
Latest Tomcat5 and Tomcat5w binaries.
Fixes the environment and JvmMs and JvmMx parsing.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +129 -115 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5.exe
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Petr Jiricka wrote:
- Continue to deliver a stable release of Tomcat in roughly 1 month
intervals. One of the reasons why Tomcat is so highly valued in the
community is because the time between finding a bug and deliveing the
fix is very short, thanks to the short release
Costin Manolache wrote:
I'm sorry, but can't remember - why do we still need the endorsed ?
I tought they were a temporary solution for JDK1.4 and some validation
problems - tomcat should work fine with any SAX/DOM parser, including
the one in JDK1.4.
This would be good, if it's indeed
Hi,
The format I use for MD5 sums is the standard one. Every other project
I know uses this format, so I think if anything this user needs to
adjust his preferences ;) However, if there's a standard or spec
somewhere that mandates we use md5 -r (reverse output format), then
sure, someone point
Hi,
I have a couple of only-slightly-related comments, but related
nonetheless so I'll put them here.
Re: endorsed directories. Do we still want to support JDK 1.3 in Tomcat
5.1? Since we're gearing up for JDK 1.5, we might want to make 1.4 the
minimum. I'm +0.5 on this.
As for the nature of
I for one use the CATALINA_BASE vs CATALINA_HOME
Mitchell Marx
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:53 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.0.28 release
Hi,
I have a couple of only-slightly-related comments,
This is the md5 output generated by BSD md5 and not necessarily a
standard, GNU md5sum generates a different format that is not
standard as well. For maven, just the checksum portion of the content
is stored in the file.
It would be nice if there was a standard in this area, but I have yet to
mturk 2004/08/10 06:49:11
Modified:ajp/proxy mod_proxy.c
Log:
Use the pool for add_worker call.
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/proxy/mod_proxy.c
Index: mod_proxy.c
For example here are the outputs of the various signing tools we use at
this time:
BSD md5:
md5 commons-collections-3.1.jar
MD5 (commons-collections-3.1.jar) = d1dcb0fbee884bb855bb327b8190af36
while the GNU md5 script generates the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jars]$ md5sum
mturk 2004/08/10 06:50:53
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_util.c mod_proxy.h
Log:
Shared memory support. The shared memory is inside
apache scoreboard. If it ever gets back ported we could use it on 2.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +45 -12
Hi,
Well, as always, when there's an established practice I'd like a
stronger reason than it would probably be good to change it ;) I see
what you mean, but I don't know that the GNU md5 is any more prevalent
than the BSD md5 or vice versa...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
mturk 2004/08/10 06:52:51
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_balancer.c
Log:
Use the proxy_runtime_stat that either comes from scoreboard or
directly allocating memory if there is no scoreboard support or it is not
neaded, due to the fact that we have single child process.
Revision
mturk 2004/08/10 07:58:24
Modified:ajp/proxy mod_proxy.c proxy_balancer.c proxy_util.c
mod_proxy.h
Log:
Implement the worker retry functionality.
It uses either worker-retry option or default 60 second retry
that is on each revolution extended by
Remy Maucherat wrote:
One simple solution is to add
% // Force the initialization of action servlet
RequestDispatcher
actionS=getServletContext().getNamedDispatcher(action).include(request,response);
%
in login.jsp
This seems good enough already.
Ok, I'll check it in then after I figure out
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
BTW, does the spec says that the form login page is excluded from
filters ??
That's undefined, as it's some kind of internal dispatching of the
container. It seemed reasonable trying to do it with a RD forward.
Well, if I have a filter on /* and / (
I would have to agree with the gentlemen from Sun and NetBeans that it
is preferable to have a standard stable version bundled with other
products as opposed to some other file set which one cannot
independently reproduce.
Why?
Users of NetBeans, etc, would like to know that they can reproduce
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of only-slightly-related comments, but related
nonetheless so I'll put them here.
Re: endorsed directories. Do we still want to support JDK 1.3 in Tomcat
5.1? Since we're gearing up for JDK 1.5, we might want to make 1.4 the
minimum. I'm +0.5 on this.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
BTW, does the spec says that the form login page is excluded from
filters ??
That's undefined, as it's some kind of internal dispatching of the
container. It seemed reasonable trying to do it with a RD forward.
Well, if I have
Yes, well, I actually do not think much thought has gone into this
subject at Apache, until know I think perople have thought the .md5 file
format was a standard or something.
I've been researching md5 applications in terms of attempting to make a
recommendation to the repository group on the
Hola,
I'm using JDK1.3 most of the time, and I think a lot of other people
and
companies are still using it. I don't mind having the default
distribution built for 1.4+ ( no xerces ), with instructions on how to
get the additional jars for 1.3. But I think it would be very bad to
not
be able to
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Well, as always, when there's an established practice I'd like a
stronger reason than it would probably be good to change it ;) I see
what you mean, but I don't know that the GNU md5 is any more prevalent
than the BSD md5 or vice versa...
Maven format is the one we should
This is a documentation bug, it should be:
!-- Maximum number of idle dB connections to retain in pool.
Set to -1 for no limit.
--
A connection is considered idle when it is returned to the pool by
calling conn.close()
So by setting maxIdle=0 you never get any connection in
Hi,
Well, I buy Mark's research. What he says is reasonable. But I agree
we should move the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if only to ensure the
consensus.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Title: patch - changes in Tomcat-4.1.29´s Jasper to support different encodings
I´ve made some changes in Jasper to support easyer encoding variations, here is the patches.
Regards,
Edson Alves Pereira
jasper-patch.tar.gz
Title: patch - changes in Tomcat-4.1.29´s Jasper to support different encodings
I´ve made some changes in Jasper to support easyer encoding variations, here is the patches.
Regards,
Edson Alves Pereira
jasper-patch.tar.gz
mturk 2004/08/10 11:00:17
Modified:ajp/proxy mod_proxy.c
Log:
Make sure that if the pre_request was called that the post_request
gets called too, no mather what the error code is.
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +8 -5
mturk 2004/08/10 11:01:26
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_ajp.c
Log:
Fix the return codes. We can not return the APR error codes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +23 -24jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/proxy/proxy_ajp.c
Index: proxy_ajp.c
mturk 2004/08/10 11:02:54
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_balancer.c
Log:
Fix the url rewriting, and few minor developement bugs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +22 -10jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/proxy/proxy_balancer.c
Index: proxy_balancer.c
mturk 2004/08/10 11:05:01
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Make sure that the things get logged using the same look-and-feal.
Also fix the return code from DECLINED to service unavailable if the connection
breaks.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +15 -8
mturk 2004/08/10 11:06:49
Modified:ajp/proxy proxy_util.c
Log:
Add some extra debugging to ease the bug chasing :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +32 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/proxy/proxy_util.c
Index: proxy_util.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It seams it is impossible to set the response buffer
size(response.setBufferSize) with anything less than 8K. That is,
response.getBufferSize() still returns 8K. Anything over 8K does work.
I downloaded the source and pinned it down to the following:
In
spec-quote version=servlet 2.4 section=14.2.22
Sets the preferred buffer size for the body of the response. The servlet
container will use a buffer at least as large as the size requested. The
actual buffer size used can be found using getBufferSize.
/spec-quote
- Original Message -
From:
remm2004/08/10 15:42:37
Modified:.build.xml build.properties.default
catalina build.xml
webapps/admin build.xml
catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory Constants.java
Log:
- Repackage DBCP as a single JAR and, more
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/08/10 16:16:09
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
ParserController.java Mark.java
Log:
Ported fix for Bugzilla 29971 (Commented out page directive is parsed)
Revision ChangesPath
No
luehe 2004/08/10 16:33:02
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
Mark.java JspReader.java JspDocumentParser.java
ErrorDispatcher.java
Log:
Ported fix for Bugzilla 30073 (NPE when compiling .jspx with
luehe 2004/08/10 16:37:50
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
JspDocumentParser.java
Log:
Ported fix for Bugilla 30067 (Scripting elements are disallowed here exception
behind scriptless tag)
Revision ChangesPath
luehe 2004/08/10 16:48:00
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Log:
Updated change log for Tomcat 5.0.28
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.70.2.1 +42 -0
On Tuesday, Aug 10, 2004, at 18:41 America/New_York, Bill Barker wrote:
spec-quote version=servlet 2.4 section=14.2.22
Sets the preferred buffer size for the body of the response. The
servlet
container will use a buffer at least as large as the size requested.
The
actual buffer size used can be
luehe 2004/08/10 17:50:29
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
Generator.java
Log:
Ported fixes for:
- Bugzilla 30291 (Smap for a tag should not include its body)
- Bugzilla 30289 (Incorrect Smap for multiple line java
luehe 2004/08/10 17:52:39
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Log:
Added 30291 and 30289
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.70.2.2 +6 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Take bugs 30551 and 30552. One is reported under Tomcat 5, one under
Tomcat 4.
When a user goes to report a bug he has to first search existing
bugs. Right now you would have to search under multiple Project
entries, and you would have no way of limiting your search by release
number
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Data.txt
.exe (in Data.zip)
The uncleanable file is
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Part-2.txt
.exe (in Part-2.zip)
The uncleanable file
54 matches
Mail list logo
