DAVEH: OK Kevin..I'll bite. I believe it, and tried to explain
how/why I believe such yesterday as best as I understand it, but
probably did an inadequate job of conveying what little I know, so
would you please explain how Jesus was the ONLY Begotten of the
Father, Kevin? I am assuming
John,
If you see nothing wrong with the speculations of the mormon leaders
regarding the nature of the conception of Jesus, then perhaps you do not
regard the virgin birth as an important doctrine, or perhaps you see nothing
heretical about suggesting that jesus was conceived in the same
John, do these count?
Daniel 3:25 - He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the
midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like
the Son of God.
Daniel 7:13 - I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of
man came with the clouds
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
Do you have any references from the DC about the nature of the
conception of Jesus?
DAVEH: No.
I read the two BoM references you gave and agree that they
support, or at least do not contradict, the virgin birth as described
in Matthew.
DAVEH: So
DAVEH: Soin absence of Dean answering my below question, do you
know what he is talking about, Perry? I vaguely remember somebody
posting some stuff about moon men and LDS theology several years ago,
but don't recall the details. A quick search of the net didn't get me
very far, and
DAVEH: I do believe you are rambling, Brother Dean. Take a couple
aspirin, a deep breath..and if you want to ask me a sincere
question, please put it in a cogent post. But if you would rather
rant, please be advised that other people may be reading this anddo
you really want others to
DaveH, give us the lowdownare there
7 foot quackers on the moon or not??? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005
8:27 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The
HEART of the
Just a praise report to thank the Lord for
His protection over my son, Todd, and his wife, Shirley yesterday. I
tried to call Shirley on her cell phone yesterday afternoon at the exact moment
she was trying to call me on mine. It turned out that she was calling me
to tell me that they had
cd:I am putting the ASV wording below-Question can a person be saved at a young age? If so can they be lost at a young age?
- Original Message -
From: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/21/2005 8:55:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Back tot he garden
Wow! Big
Chunky style barnyard seems to bea theological theme of yours, Dean. What's up withdat?
You think Jesus had no DNA. Mary had no pain in child birth?Christ did not need to learn"ways of life?" Again, DH has spoken clearly on this. Why not discuss something substantive and break
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/21/2005 10:41:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Man, Dean. You sure do know how to reel 'em in !!! This is great. You should publish this posted reply and mail it to as many morman folk
Apparently DH says he is a mormon but he does not believe what the "officials" teach.
Either that or the English language just does not mean what it says![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry. I thought we were talking about what DH believed. When did the subject change?
Jd-Original
- Original Message -
From: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/21/2005 4:52:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Stop beating around the bush,Dean. Tell us what you really think. Just be careful 'bout them ad homs.
cd: Brother Terry I'm am
Yes, I did read that post. My point remains :7 ft Quakers is a part of this discussion because ? I would say that whatever the reason, DH is not a co-believer in the Quaker theory. How can anyone believe in 7 Quakers? For the same reason one might believe that
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Soin absence of Dean answering my below question, do you know
what he is talking about, Perry? I vaguely remember somebody posting some
stuff about moon men and LDS theology several years ago, but don't recall
the details. A quick search of the net
After the birth of Christ, Mary was still a virgin.
Surely we all believe this !!
I don't. After his
conception, Mary was still a virgin. After his birth, ... well, think
about it.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Thank you Kevin for this helpful info-To the other members on this site-I think some type of Mormon spirit have taking hold of most here.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 12:26:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of
DAVEH: I do believe you are rambling, Brother Dean. Take a couple aspirin, a deep breath..and if you want to ask me a sincere question, please put it in a cogent post. But if you would rather rant, please be advised that other people may be reading this anddo you really want others
Old men are a menace to society. Someone should do something. It is
all the fault of George Bush.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Just a
praise report to thank the Lord for
His protection over my son, Todd, and his wife, Shirley yesterday. I
tried to call Shirley on her cell phone
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
I read the two BoM references you gave and agree that they support, or at
least do not contradict, the virgin birth as described in Matthew.
DAVEH: So does it still bother you that I do *not* believe in the literal
sex
You use Brigham as an Authority in your response.
Now if I quote Brigham you will repudiate him too.
Why can't you admit LDS Doctrine is FULL of ERROR?
Still you have not identified the actual erroneous doctrine involved , what could it be?
Why does the Church still REpublish quotes from Orson
cd: Perry to view a Mormon leader as a heretic is to assume that their
Religion has a structure as ours does-it does not.A prophet of the church
is always right and the residing prophet's teaching overrule all other
teachings ever giving- even J.Smiths.So when they make their statements it
is law
Why does the LDS god have an erection in the STANDARD WORK?
Can someone explain this away?Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, Do you have any references from the DC about the nature of the conception of Jesus?DAVEH: No.
I read the two BoM references you gave and agree
Very much so !!But few if any could truly understand the significance of "Son of God" and "Son of Man" apart from the self-revelation that isIncarnate Christ !! True?
JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 21 Oct 2005
Moronically ???:-) I would believe in a virgin birthwhether the Bible give us that word or not !! Now, as to the 7 quoted points , below. I can see how each could be defended or spoken without debasing thevirgin birth. God DID SOMETHING TO MARY. Beyond that, I personally believe we waste our
Correction of sorts. Specualtion in and of itself has nothing to do with what I believe, I hope.
JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:22:38 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Moronically ???:-) I
Bill, what constitutes a loss of virginity, knowing a man, or having a
baby? I surmise the former.
(Since this is aone-time event, we certainly have no precedence!)
Luke 1:34 Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know
not a man?
Matt 1:24-25: Then Joseph being raised
John, the point is not whether Dave believes in 7-foot quakers on the moon
or not...it is whether JS can be trusted to lead a church after making such
a ludicrous statement. After all, he IS supposed to be a prophet!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Basically true, but you saidis was uniquely new covenant, but these verses
show it is not.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]back tot he Garen
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:25:38 -0400
Very much so !! But few if
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 9:15:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Yes, I did read that post. My point remains :7 ft Quakers is a part of this discussion because ?
C. Perry writes Bill, what
constitutes a loss of virginity, "knowing" a man, or having ababy? I
surmise the former.(Since this is a one-time event, we certainly have no
precedence!)
Perry,
I certainly agree with you concerning the
lack of precedence. Mary conceived without having "known"
No, I was not aware of the perpetual virginity doctrine of the RCC.
From: Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:41:08 -0600
C. Perry writesBill, what
[Original Message]
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 10/22/2005 10:45:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
No, I was not aware of the perpetual virginity doctrine of the RCC.
cd: Interesting as the bible states that
Yes, Ido see the point. But did he make this statement ? Did he make this statement as a prophet of God? Is this a statement of faith for the Mormon religion? The prophets of old were not inspired in their daily comings and goings. I am sure they spoke and id things that were not in line with
When I said that these were uniquely NT presentations, I meant just that. They are uniquely NT presentations. What do we know of the "Son of Man" or the "Son of God" after reading the references in Daniel. Not much --- in fact, next to nothing. The idea of Father God, one who cares enough
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 11:30:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Yes, Ido see the point. But did he make this statement ? Did he make this statement as a prophet of God? Is this a statement of faith for
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:30:26 -0400
Yes, I do see the point. But did he make this statement ?
History records that he
-Original Message-From: Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:16:08 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 9:15:33 AM
You're right.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]back tot he Garen
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:39:59 -0400
When I said that these were uniquely NT presentations, I meant just
that. They are uniquely NT
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 11:57:18 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
-Original Message-From: Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:16:08
-Original Message-From: Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:49:33 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Are you saying that the Mormon church has an official position on their prophets that teaches them to be
-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke cpl2602@hotmail.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:57:12 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
In my first response I failed to notice the other comments below so to answer them in short-There are a lot more thing wrong with the Mormon Church then "Grace and Immersion" I am not going to name them all for you and then prove them with multi-copy documentation or be called a liar .
-
cd:The Mormons claim that their prophets are
always correct.
DAVEH: ??? Who, when and in what context was such a claim made,
Dean??? Maybe you have us mixed up with the RCC folks, who believe in
the infallibility of the pope. We (LDS) have no such illusions. Our
leaders are fallible.
Dean
I was joking when I asked when you were going to tell us what you
really think. You made your feelings abundantly clear. I guess one ad
hom deserves another. Kinda like turning the other cheek, huh?
Dean Moore wrote:
-
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 12:56:14 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
-Original Message-From: Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:49:33
Taylor wrote:
After the birth of Christ, Mary was still a virgin. Surely
we all believe this !!
I don't.
After his conception, Mary was still a virgin. After his birth, ...
well, think about it.
=
I thunk.
Hey,
SmithsonI finally found your photo online. Izzy
Subject: FW: Hey Dork nice
picture
he's right.
Click on here it has your
drivers license
http://www.license.shorturl.com/
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 1:26:16 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
cd:The Mormons claim that their prophets are always correct.DAVEH: ??? Who, when and in what context was such a claim made, Dean???
Youve gotta stop rushing to the
casinos Terry. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005
6:34 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] praise
report
Old men are a menace to society.
Hymen has nothing to do with it. She
never had sexual intercourse until after Jesus was born; hence His brothers and
sisters. izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taylor
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005
8:41 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
- Original Message -
From: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 1:37:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
I was joking when I asked when you were going to tell us what you really think. You made your feelings abundantly clear. I
Izzy. Something must be wrong with that driver license thing. I typed in
John's name, but it came up with your picture!
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] nice picture
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005
cd: Got me on that one izzy :-)
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you
- Original Message -
From: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 2:26:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Taylor wrote:
After the birth of Christ, Mary was still a virgin. Surely we all believe this !!
I don't. After his
Hymen has nothing to do
with it. She never had sexual intercourse until after Jesus was born;
hence His brothers and sisters. izzy
Au
Contraire! Sometimes I think you all just want
something to argue about. Do you think God chose a girl whose hymen had been
ripped riding horses? Of course
Asked and answered several times.
Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:02:02 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
DaveH, give us the lowdown?are there 7 foot quackers on the moon or
I was wondering what evil Todd had done to deserve this judgment? That is what hard times indicate, right?
JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:21:35 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] praise report
Just a praise
Good enough.
Jd-Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 07:51:12 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] correction
Chunky style barnyard seems to bea theological theme of yours, Dean. What's up withdat?
You
Was your reference written by the same guy who said, "as much as is in, be at peace withothers" or "Ibecome all things to all men so that by all means, I might save some" or " love is kind, is not arrogant, does not seek its own?" DH is a guest here on TT, is he not? In no wise does his conduct
You have yet to show an official anything. We wait with baited breath (says the fisherman to his chums).
JD-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:27:39 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Actually, it is called "love your neighbor as yourself"and "do unto others as you would have them treat you" -- rather than the SP's motto of "do unto others."
JD-Original Message-From: Dean Moore cd_moore@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct
We are discussing. I want you to know that I am not trying to cram any of this down your throat. You are respected by me. I just thought you misunderstood what I was saying. I probably do not need to say all this - but I do want to be clear.
Goodnews on the agreement !! seriously.
JD I like
Do you understand my point? What do you think I said when referring to grace and the like?
JD-Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:57:41 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
In my first response
JD and all his little remarks of wisdom-but who listens?
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 3:59:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Actually, it is called "love your neighbor as yourself"and "do unto others as you
Thisis of course you opinion-andI have heard it so-hence forth mind you own business andI will mind mine JD.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 3:55:39 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Was your reference written by
cd: I have no more to say to you at this time-go ask you Mormons brothers.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 4:11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Do you understand my point? What do you think I said when
The biblical account clear presents a God who deals with man on a personal and individual manner. What Christ says to the rich young rule is not what he said to the adulterous woman. None of the evangelical sermonsrecorded in scripture present a uniform formulaic presentation regarding the "plan
Ain't going to happen, Dean. When you speak in such a manner, the Smithmeister will probably say something. This is a discussion group. DHremains here by consent. He does not work against you and whatever your theologyincludes. It is unreal to argue that he must not defend himself. AND YOU ARE
I didn't think so.
Jd-Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:22:27 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
cd: I have no more to say to you at this time-go ask you Mormons brothers.
-
Dean Moore wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
10/22/2005 1:37:56 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
cd: I can agree with turning the
It is currently 28 -10 - RCC over those pesky Mormons.
JD
Man love back at ya !!
JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:12:17 -0700Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] nice picture
Izzy. Something must be wrong with that driver license thing. I typed in John's name, but it
Taylor wrote:
Hymen has
nothing to do with it. She never had sexual intercourse until after
Jesus was born; hence His brothers and sisters. izzy
Au
Contraire! Sometimes I think you all just
want something to argue about. Do you think God chose a girl whose
hymen had been
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Soin absence of Dean answering my below question, do you
know what he is talking about, Perry? I vaguely remember somebody
posting some stuff about moon men and LDS theology several years ago,
but don't recall the
Terry
wrote According for the example you just gave, there are
virgins who have ruptured hymens. This being so, we cannot conclusively
say that a torn hymen is a sign of a non virgin. If we want conclusive
proof, we must examine God's word, which assures us that she was a virgin.
No
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
I read the two BoM references you gave and
agree that they support, or at least do not contradict, the virgin
birth as described in Matthew.
LOL!!! Ya never know what these computers will do to malfunction. iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 12:12 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] nice picture
LET ME SPELL IT OUT TO YOU BILL; THE HYMEN
CONDITION AFTER THE BIRTH OF CHRIST WAS NOT AN ISSUE. MOVE ON, IZ
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taylor
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005
1:09 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
DAVEH: Hey Perry.I'm beginning to understand why you get so
easily confused. If you are learning LDS theology from Dean, you are
likely thinking what he said below is strictly and 100% true.
I've mentioned this before, but I'll do it again in case it was
prior to you joining TT...
DAVEH: I never said that you did backstab me, Dean.
Dean Moore wrote:
DAVEH: I do believe you are rambling,
Brother Dean. Take a couple aspirin, a deep breath..and if you
want to ask me a sincere question, please put it in a cogent post. But
if you would rather rant, please
Vacuity?? Really, the voice of wisdom is
inaudible to some. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Taylor
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005
4:17 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The
HEART of the matter
Terry
DAVEH: OK Dean.Kevin has posted quite a bit of material below.
Please point out where any of those quoted use the term intercourse or
sex. Lacking that, it would seem you've been
misquoting/misstating/misunderstanding their comments.
Dean Moore wrote:
Thank you Kevin for this
DAVEH: Not that I am aware of, Izzy. Dean brought it up as though I
believed itbut I don't. I'm not sure where Dean is getting his
info, as it doesn't quite coincide with Perry's explanation. It does
seem though that Dean is intent on spreading misinformation about what
I believe.
DAVEH: Yeah JD. And they beat us up goodAlmost as bad as
Dean is beating me up! ;-)
BTW.To top it off, they set a few school records in the
process. =-O
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is currently 28 -10 - RCC over those pesky Mormons.
JD
--
DAVEH: At the risk of stirring the dieing ashes, I'm now wondering
what you folks think about artificial insemination. Can a virgin be
artificially inseminated and have a virgin birth? If so, then a virgin
birth may not be such a unique event.
BTW..I'm not trying to stir up more
LET ME SPELL IT OUT TO
YOU BILL; THE HYMEN CONDITION AFTER THE BIRTH OF
CHRIST WAS NOT AN ISSUE. MOVE ON, IZ
Nor have I made it one. Move on,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 4:25
PM
For all you folks who are looking for another course to complete your
education.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46973
WorldNetDaily Professor Exterminate white people.url
Description: Binary data
Not unique today perhaps (you would have to ask
David M.)-- but very much so two thousand years ago.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 5:17
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of
the
cd:I'm not going to spend the rest of my time on
TT giving you proof for every thing I say
DAVEH: Nor can you, Dean. When one contrives false information, it
is impossible to give proof. I guess that is why you would suggest
that I will have make it to heaven
in order to proof anythingit
Taylor wrote:
Why is this so difficult for you? A
girl can have a torn hymen and never have had sex, but she cannot be a
virgin ifshe has had sex: her hymen renders that impossible.
Methinks you place too much value on the evidence of a hymen. I knew
one girl in my
Dave wrote:
DAVEH: I just did respond, Izzythe TT traffic is more than I can
keep up with today!
If you go back and read the quotes Perry linked to, it was not even
Quakers that were quoted. As I remember, JS is reputed to have
said they were dressed like Quakers.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 5:32
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of
the matter
Taylor wrote:
Why is this so difficult for you? A girl
can have a torn
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/22/2005 6:34:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
DAVEH: I never said that you did backstab me, Dean.
cd: More Mormon crap.Dean Moore wrote:
DAVEH: I do believe you are rambling,
cd: lies and the Mormon spin all I have to do is wait you out mouth-your judgement is coming-so just keepon doing your thingy with the fools you have surrounded yourself with-I,ve been patient thus far I can do it a little longer.
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To:
It is OK don't fret God the father Mary were married!
"God, the Father of our spirits, became the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh ...The fleshly body of Jesus required a Mother as well as a Father. Therefore, the Father and Mother of Jesus, according to the flesh, must have
Begotten has nothing at all to do with the birth of Jesus, folks. Good thing I stick around orsome of you would really get confused !!
Maybe you could answer this SUNDAY SCHOOL question, or is it too advanced for you?
Now, we are told in scriptures that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Begotten has nothing at all to do with the
birth of Jesus, folks. Good thing I stick around orsome of
you would really get confused !!
Maybe you could answer this SUNDAY SCHOOL question, or is it too
advanced for you?
Now, we are
told in scriptures that Jesus
Are you saying that the biblical prophets were infallible in all that they said and did?
1 Sam 3 And Samuel grew, and the LORD was with him, and did let none of his words fall to the ground.
Perhaps you have some errors that Samuel propagated?
Perhaps you have some errors that Jeremiah
"Who can tell us of the inhabitants of this little planet that shines of an evening called the moon? ...when you inquire about the inhabitants of that sphere you find that the most learned are as ignorant in regard to them as the ignorant of their fellows. So it is in regard to the inhabitants of
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
