: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology
Could be one and the
same; maybe not. Just seems where theres symbolism (dragon), there could be
more. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Slade
And angels are called stars? J Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005
5:41 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology
Could it not be symbolism
In a message dated 1/20/2005 6:17:03 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When you getting your eye-underderstanding coordination
I am wondering if some critics will attack me based on this coordination problem. Let's wait and see.
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005
8:20 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
In a message dated 1/20/2005 6:17:03
In a message dated 1/20/2005 6:55:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dont worry JD, we realize you have bigger problems. J
Don't be so hard on yourself.
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 20:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
Itis my opinion - that this moderation thing is
getting too oppressive. When
LOL!
That was hysterical
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jeff
PowersSent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2005 16.37To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean
In a message dated 1/18/2005 4:06:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To call that ad hominem is straining at gnats IMO. She did not call him any ugly names. She is criticizing a theology not a person. Izzy (Since you asked.)
So, if I said that her theology was thoughtless,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:08:19 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about just discussing the validity of the
teaching in question?
You can't do that without insulting the
person or the teaching itself?
jt: Why not? We should be able
to be Berean here which is to compare different teachings
In a message dated 1/19/2005 6:41:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not? We should be able to be Berean here which is to compare different teachings alongside the Word of God
How does one insult a teaching it is either true or false and if false it needs to be brought to
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:20:12 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't have any "teachings" that are my
own John; my goal is toagree with the "Teacher" so I
can
receive and walk in His
doctrine with those who are likeminded. So if you call that "stupid" then that
is
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2005
23.16
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology
Hint: Stars =
Angels?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade
In a message dated 1/18/2005 4:06:55 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To call that ad hominem
is straining at gnats IMO. She did not call him any ugly names. She
is criticizing a theology not a person. Izzy (Since you asked.)
So, if I said that her theology was
myth (they're all your
ownacc toyour own falsifications)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:20:12 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't have any "teachings" of my own
||
that's the seventh
spirituallife of the cat (seven is the perfect
number)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:00:36 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
[the]squeal without the pig thingy may work after
all -- that is if you don't give a care about the
person you criticize.
a math wiz,
eh:)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:08:19 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..I count only four contributors on this forum who
apprently can't comply. 4 out of 14 contributors..
||
In a message dated 1/19/2005 4:57:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a math wiz, eh:)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:08:19 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
.. I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply. 4 out of 14 contributors..
Alright!! I've
a myth wiz, too,
eh?
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:09:34 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/19/2005 4:57:53 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a math wiz, eh:) On Wed, 19
Jan 2005 09:08:19 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||.. I count only four
In a message dated 1/19/2005 6:15:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a myth wiz, too, eh?
oh, you betcha !! I do much better with criticism from friends than enemies.
J
In a message dated 1/19/2005 8:45:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't have any "teachings" that are my own John; my goal is to agree with the "Teacher" so I can
receive and walk in His doctrine with those who are likeminded. So if you call that "stupid" then that is
jt: No John, apparently I don't have a clue what you
were talking about but no point in being the
voice
of the accuser and getting your knickers in a knot.
Why not explain the interaction below to me in a
patient and lucid manner as a pastor, bishop, beloved
etc. or even a normal vanilla
Hearsay, hearsay, hearsay beware!!
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:51:58 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/17/2005 2:19:08 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yet the theory of it you
embrac/d, publically, is Wesley's view On
Mon, 17 Jan 2005
We don't want this fear cast out, this is the only kind
of fear that is acceptable with
God. It is the kind that brings blessing rather than
torment. Perfect love casts out the
kind of fear that is accompanied by torment. All kinds
of phobias, nightmares etc.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:50:36
John, some people are able to separate themselves. From
what I understand David to sayhe still gets around in a flesh body and he
has the same opportunity to sin every day as the rest
of us both physically and emotionally. Are you baiting him? Is this
some kind
of public humiliation?
On
, by inference,
saying the same thing of every believer/non-believer in the cosmos.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 06:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian
Judy
Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
John, some people are able to separate themselves.
From what I understand David to sayhe still gets around in a flesh
body and he
has the same opportunity to s
Thought you all might find this interesting...I like to go to literal,
word for word translations. I have found it helps alot...
Quotedfrom The Orthodox Jewish Brit Chadasha:
Hisgalus (The Revelation) Perek Yod Beit (Chapter 12) v.
4
And
the tail of him drags down a
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 07:22
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
Thank you for those thoughts Lance. I use "from what
I understand" in thi
f every
believer/non-believer in the cosmos.
From:
Judy
Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
John, some people are able to separate
themselves. From what I un
: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
FWIW Lance, My belief is thatyou are in a
time warp, stuck in your cosmic incarnation while
DavidM, myself and others have moved on to the resurrection. It is the
power that emanates from the resurrection that enables
Lance wrote:
IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed.
Then I guess I am not one of you.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every
That is the point in contentionis it
not? Izzy
5. IMO, IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed. I am, by inference, saying the
same thing of every believer/non-believer in the cosmos.
Thought you all might find this
interesting...I like to go to literal, word for word translations. I have found
it helps alot...
Quotedfrom The Orthodox Jewish Brit
Chadasha:
Hisgalus (The Revelation) Perek Yod Beit
(Chapter 12) v. 4
And the tail of him
I
enjoy God's Word - and learning the fear of the Lord is profitable all around:
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life Prov 14:27
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom Prov 9:10
The fear of the Lord will prolong your days Prov 10:27
The fear of the Lord is to hate evil Prov
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 09:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
Lance wrote:
IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed.
Then I guess I am not one of you.
Peace
J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Miller
Lance wrote:
IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed.
Then I guess I am not one of you.
Peace be with you.
David
PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 09:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
Lance wrote:
IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed.
Then I guess I am
==
We could all chip in and hire someone to follow David around until they
catch him sinning, but if he doesn't sin then we might all go broke.
Probably better (and cheaper) to take him at his word . Taking him at
his word costs nothing.
.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 09:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
Lance wrote:
IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
actively
If you think I want David to make clear what is clear to me -- well, then, call it any of your favorite little names. Either he believes that he is a sinner [with current sin problems as opposed to temptation problems] or he doesn't. Since you are the one who challenged this (my assertion that
In a message dated 1/18/2005 5:02:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
others have moved on to the resurrection. It is the power that emanates from the resurrection that enables a believer to be free from sin past, the power of sin present, and the future consequence for sin.
John wrote:
I don't like it when I am talking about one
thing sin and you speak of soemthing
entirely different temptation. I do not
like that at all.
Sorry, John. Some misunderstanding here. In this particular context, I
interpret battle with sin as being the struggle one experiences
In a message dated 1/18/2005 6:47:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, are you saying that you think a mature Believer does not fear God in the Biblical sense? I believe that we all either walk in the fear of God OR in the fear of Man. The former leads to righteousness;
In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:04:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, John. Some misunderstanding here. In this particular context, I
interpret "battle with sin" as being the struggle one experiences when they
are tempted to sin. A battle can be either won or lost.
Do
In a message dated 1/18/2005 5:20:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3b. If you (you also David) are testifying to this in your life then, please say so without ambiguity.
Yes. That is all I am getting at. I thought it was clear until David sent that post talking about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/18/2005 6:47:22 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John,
are you saying that you think a mature Believer does not fear God in
the Biblical sense? I believe that we all either walk in the fear of
God OR in the fear
11.09To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anythingIn a message dated 1/18/2005
5:20:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3b. If you (you also David) are testifying to this in your life
then, ple
In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:54:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do no fear God. I AM saved. See the connections?
JD
===
Do you ever fear that you will disappoint him? Do you ever fear that you could do
something to incur His
Sent: January 18, 2005 11:58
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
Hahaha...I found that funny.
Actually, I've heard of the "Sinless Doctrine"from C. Barr and
Daniel Lee.
Run,
JohnRUN!
K
-Origi
John,
are you saying that you think a mature Believer does not fear God in the
Biblical sense? I believe that we all either walk in the fear of God OR in the
fear of Man.
The former leads to righteousness; the latter leads to sin. How do you
see it? Izzy
I do no fear God. I AM saved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/18/2005 8:54:24 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
do no fear God. I AM saved. See the connections?
JD
===
Do you ever fear that you will disappoint him? Do you
al Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2005 07:59
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
FWIW Lance, My belief
Does that mean that you David Miller are sinless?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
Lance wrote:
IFF David
er.--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005
11:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -- does sham mean anything
In a message dated 1/18/2005
ief is?"
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Tuesday, 18 January, 2005 08.00To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology -
there's a post or twoin
play alludg to at least two categories of wisdom..perhaps a semineognostic force
is at work in a virtualcult environment?
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:34:58 -0500
"Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..[re: certain ppl] in possession of
an 'objective truth' that
myth [the NT res is not a
culticevnt; everyone will re resurrectd inc Lance:)]
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:59:37 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DavidM, myself and others have moved on to the
resurrection.
Jeff wrote:
Does that mean that you David Miller are sinless?
No. It means that I do not consciously, actively, sin daily in thought,
word and deed.
On second thought, define sinless.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt,
Slade wrote:
Is this considered an ad hominem? My
belief is that you are in a time warp, stuck
in your cosmic incarnation while DavidM,
myself and others have moved on to the
resurrection Or do we allow the lawyers
say, it is not an ad hominem because Judy
used the term My belief is?
This
From:
Judy Taylor
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
John,
some people are able
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean
anything
John,
some people are able to separate themselves. From what I
] Traditional Christian theology
Thought you all
might find this interesting...I like to go to literal, word for word
translations. I have found it helps
alot...
Quotedfrom
The Orthodox Jewish Brit Chadasha:
Hisgalus (The
Revelation
ost potent of weapons.That weapon is
prayer.--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 18:40
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology
-- does sham mean anything
Jeff
w
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:03:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ad hominem?
the hair splitting
distinctionsyouresort toelicit serious critiques
ofyour sup/posed dichotomies in (e.g.) wisdom, sin, and
resurrection..mismanaged Bib languageyields cult lang/logic persuasive
BLAINE: Aah! At last, the facts! Good Job! Thank you mucho, DavidM!!
Taking the passage in context, however, I can still see why the KJV might have
translated the word (espouranios) differently than in most other contexts.
Paul does seem to be discssing governmental high places otherwise.
Hint: Stars = Angels?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005
7:24 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology
I said literally STARS.
Who/what
Many will say 'I took a homeless guy home with me.
I washed and, clothed him. I helped get him a place to live and a job'
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005 23:01
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
"The Song Remains The Same" Led
Zeppelin
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 2:04
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology
Hey Gary.Some advice I
need - or
On COMPARING: Why then the need for 2, count 'em two, Moderators?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 17, 2005 00:23
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology
John wrote:
Two things: (1) You didn't
In a message dated 1/17/2005 1:52:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
(2) how is it that you are like Jesus at [His]
age 5? How is this possible with the Holy
Spirit teaching you propose. Is the Holy
Spirit slow to act? Why not, BAM, there
you are? I mean God has
] Traditional Christian theology
John wrote:
Two things: (1) You didn't answer any of
my questions and
I don't see the point in your questions, so I did not take the time to
answer them. I wrote what I thought was more relevant to conveying an
understanding to you of my perspective of spiritual
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:46:17 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A wonderful non-answer.
What specifically makes the difference between
you being 5years old and eventually 15 ?
I can figure out the "growth"
part. What is lacking in your life that relegates you to
this early age
G is no prophet, JD.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005
1:04 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Traditional Christian theology
Hey Gary.
Some advice I need - or maybe
In a message dated 1/17/2005 8:00:23 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When did DavidM say his battle with sin was over when he received the indwelling Spirit?
OK -- let's confirm. What about this David?
J
Lance wrote:
Why then the need for 2, count 'em
two, Moderators?
Because I have too much bias and too many blind spots to do it alone.
Plural leadership helps us be more fair to everyone. I take it you are not
Presbyterian or Church of Christ. LOL.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
Judy wrote:
When did DavidM say his battle with sin
was over when he received the indwelling
Spirit?
John wrote:
OK -- let's confirm.
What about this David?
She is correct. I continue to battle with the temptation to sin. I will
say that I do not have the inner struggle described by
myth (like wisdom is wisdom, sin
is sin)
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:28:09 -0500
"David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:..the young believer, although
he does not sin, has inner struggles which the mature believer does
not..
And like the young (and at times old) believer is not
overburdened with it. The fear of the Lord
is the beginning of wisdom. Not much fear
evidenced here. Not much respect for listowner or
moderators. Lots of immature grumbling and
complaining. Fear of God is learned behavior. jt
On Mon,
but you enjoy John Wesley,
eh?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:53:45 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fear of the Lord
is the beginning of
wisdom.
I enjoy God's Word - and learning the fear of the Lord
is profitable all around:
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life Prov
14:27
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom Prov
9:10
The fear of the Lord will prolong your days Prov
10:27
The fear of the Lord is to hate evil Prov
yetthetheory of
ityou embrac/d, publically,is Wesley's view
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:11:44 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I enjoy God's Word
..
So far as I can tell there are not several options
available. It says what it says.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:17:15 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yetthetheory of
ityou embrac/d, publically,is Wesley's view
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:11:44 -0500
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what does this
mean?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:22:50 -0500 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So far as I can tell there are not
several options available. It says what it says.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:17:15 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yetthetheory of
ityou
In a message dated 1/17/2005 1:29:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy wrote:
When did DavidM say his battle with sin
was over when he received the indwelling
Spirit?
John wrote:
OK -- let's confirm.
What about this David?
She is correct. I continue to battle with the
I don't know why I have to choke this out of David, when his postings have been very clear on the subject to everyone except Judy.
Here is the question and we can start the discussion from this:
David Miller,. do you have sin in your life to any degree? Consider sins of omission (knowing to
In a message dated 1/17/2005 2:14:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I enjoy God's Word - and learning the fear of the Lord is profitable all around:
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life Prov 14:27
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom Prov 9:10
The fear of
In a message dated 1/17/2005 2:19:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yet the theory of it you embrac/d, publically, is Wesley's view
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:11:44 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I enjoy God's Word ..
This is Judy's way of saying "yes" G.
J
In a message dated 1/15/2005 2:26:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have talked about this before. You are following a terrible translation
here. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned..." The word sinned here is
aorist indicative active. It means past tense. It then
Hmm, I differ in my interpretation of high places. It means people who
occupy positions of high visibility, usually in government jobs, but could also
be those in teaching, clerics, etc. who are able to influence others by setting
the pace, or setting the example for others to follow. A
In a message dated 1/15/2005 2:26:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sin as a noun, meaning the sin principle of the flesh is with us as long as
we are in this flesh, but this is not the same thing as saying that there is
no time we can say that we do not continue to sin.
, 16 January, 2005 11.34
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology
Hmm, I differ in my interpretation of high places. It means people who
occupy positions of high visibility, usually in government jobs, but could
also be those in teaching, clerics
Regarding Eph. 6:12, Blaine wrote:
I differ in my interpretation of high places.
It means people who occupy positions of high
visibility, usually in government jobs, but could
also be those in teaching, clerics, etc. who are
able to influence others by setting the pace, or
setting the
John wrote:
David, have you done everything possible
today,
for the service of the ministry. This
day, did you
pour yourself out for the
afflicted? Is there any
degree of selfishness or pride in your
life.
You you say that you lived your life exactly
as
God in Christ would have
Two things: (1) You didn't answer any of my questions and (2) how is it that you are like Jesus at [His] age 5? How is this possible with the Holy Spirit teaching you propose. Is the Holy Spirit slow to act? Why not, BAM, there you are? I mean God has taken over your life, right. Has God taken
lk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 11:39
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional
Christian theology
Two things: (1)
You didn't answer any of my questions and (2) how is it that you are like
Jesus at [His] age 5? How is this possible with the Holy Spirit tea
John wrote:
Two things: (1) You didn't answer any of
my questions and
I don't see the point in your questions, so I did not take the time to
answer them. I wrote what I thought was more relevant to conveying an
understanding to you of my perspective of spiritual growth. I have no
In a message dated 1/16/2005 9:20:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
Two things: (1) You didn't answer any of
my questions and
I don't see the point in them, so I did not take the time. I wrote what I thought was more relevant to conveying an understanding to
Hey Gary.
Some advice I need - or maybe your observation. What happens now, G? Here on TT. Do I expect to see continued harang under the pretense of honest debate coupled with the most inconsistent of leadership solutions or do things get worse? Just wanting to know so I can prepare myself
A whole bunch of people will be saved via the gracious consideration of the
Lord. A whole bunch more will be lost, choosing to serve the created rather than the Creator.
JD
Which
is S-I-N. Izzy
I had Romans 1:25 in mind. What had you in mind?
JD
That works. We are the
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:40:56 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
JD: We are
saved by grace throught faith apart from our working of the Law.
Our/His faith is reckoned as if it were personal
righteousness--and we are saved, in part,because of that
consideration on
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
