Well said.
Do you realize that this thread is actually being talked about on both
lists now! :-)
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2C] Religious Wars
Chill,
-Original Message-
From: Dawn Wolthuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:33 PM
To: Brian Leach
Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] RE: Get a grip - was ads - was U2 University Last
snip
3. The REAL problem as I see it, is not the fact that topics
Man, I didn't realize that posting my opinion about the U2U would have
ended up in a cyber war.
Being a user, sometimes contributor, U2UG Presidential candidate, and
someone that does influence buying products for the company I work for,
I don't care what the subject line contains because most of
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Jerry Banker wrote:
Man, I didn't realize that posting my opinion about the U2U would have
ended up in a cyber war.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2
Dawn, I fully agree with you. I do belong to the u2-community list and
from experience I can say that if a discussion is sent to community you
may as well just say end of discussion. And, I have seen some
discussions that should have been continued but died in this way.
Jerry
-Original
Wally,
Over all I think most of the discussions were great and very
informative. The geeky classes were definitely geared toward geeks. The
information about future developments was also great. The only class I
attended that was a disappointment, to me, was DS2009 Basic Extensions:
Your Key to
I'd also like to add that everyone better start looking into Eclipse
because some great things are going to be built on that platform. They
are also looking to recruit developers and users for an advisory group.
So, if you have some things you would like to see added to the products
this is your
certified on administration of the newer revisions of
UniVerse and Unidata, as well as other IBM products. All-in-all I would
say it was a great start to what I hope will be an ongoing thing.
Jerry Banker
-Original Message-
From: Kate Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September
tools on a daily
basis
and giving them away.
What are you waiting for?
Regards,
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 6:25 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] U2 University
Well, let's see now, I get approximately 150 over the weekend and they
end up in my junk folder. About 99% are filtered out. That's the number
that got through our network filter.
-Original Message-
From: Allen E. Elwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:33 AM
We are trying to set up UniVerse 10.2 to talk directly to a SQL Server
system. After following all of the directions in the UV manuals and the
DataDirect docs we can talk to the SQL Server from Linux using the demo
program that comes with DataDirect but are unable to connect using UV.
As a matter
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] ODBC drivers on RedHat Linux
We are trying to set up UniVerse 10.2 to talk directly to a SQL Server
system. After following all of the directions
Universe doesn't have the noconvert command.
-Original Message-
From: David A. Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:06 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Binary data corruption on copy
Harold,
In UniData you would store your binary files
With device licensing do you use a different SYSTEM field than you do
with non-device licensing.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Dianne Ackerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:00 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Sacred Licence Seat - A
Do you know that SYSTEM(35) doesn't change on the Red Hat Linux version?
Jerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
A quick way is to create a temporary hashed file large enough to hold
all of the records. Next copy the records from the damaged file to the
new file. The records with a bad ID will not copy. Then clear the
original file or delete it and recreate it if you feel better about it.
Lastly copy the
I heard on the radio this morning that Microsoft is going to announce a
whole slew of security breaches on the new operating system today.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Ferris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 6:09 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE:
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (not named).
Warning: Please read the AngelicHost-Attachment-Warning.txt attachment(s)
for more information.
That doesn't happen with the UV version.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But then it wouldn't be as much fun. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Clifton Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:13 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Speeding up a big BY.EXP select
GEEZ people. Why don't you just ask the computer
I'll answer part of this. We were having trouble with creating pipes and
they asked us to turn off multi-threading as a possibility that it may
have been a problem on our Linux server. The selects may have been
taxing our resources. Most modern systems can handle multi-threading but
some of the
,
they would be sorted by @ID (the default).
Using @ID anywhere but the last sort field (or implied) would not make
sense
as they are guaranteed to be unique and not need a tie breaker.
Please check again.
Thanks
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users
The way I see it the first one will take longer than the second,
although it would have to be a large file you are selecting on. The
reason would be that the first one sorts the ID's, redundantly, twice
before it gets to the BY.EXP whereas the second one sorts by the ID only
once.
-Original
I'm going to the U2 University in Denver the last week of this month,
any others attending?
Jerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
PCI compliance is the bugger here. If your company doesn't have the
resources (money) to become compliant you won't get your credit cards
processed. The best bet for a company that doesn't have the resources is
to send the cards through one of the available credit card processing
companies that
So what you are saying is that relational theory, since it is not
proven, in essence does not exist. :-)
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Dawn Wolthuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:56 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
So, when Date or Codd uses the term
AMEN!!
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:14 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
Good Morning,
I really enjoyed reading this thread. I can honestly say that the
I was looking at our bookshelf, we have the old series of soft cover
manuals from V-Mark on UniVerse and then we have several books on PICK,
none of which is new. Our PICK books are from 1985 to 1990 mostly
published by TAB Professional and Reference Books, one is from Hayden
Book Company;
Doesn't Malcolm Bull still publish books?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Gravagno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:29 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: books
Charles Barouch wrote:
If you want books, we need to commit to publishers.
I'm
I think what he is asking for are tips and tricks, example programs,
troubleshooting guides with real world scenarios, how to get data in and
out of other database from the U2 side as well as from the other side
with examples. Books written in a conversational manner not in techno
geek I'm leaving
Over the last few years I have tried on several occasions to get access
to the knowledgebase through my var and have been told that they would
see about getting it for me. Last time was about 6 months ago, I'm still
waiting. Which tells me either they haven't tried to get it for me or
there is a
So what you are saying is that a shop like ours that has over the years
developed everything in-house and the applications are specifically
geared to our business and can be changed as our business changes is out
of luck when it comes to getting into the knowledgebase. Just because we
don't buy an
), but access by an end-user
seems to be the exception rather the norm.
Is anyone from IBM in this mail list want to comment?
Cheers,
David Murray
.learn and do
.excel and share
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Wednesday, July
To me that is foolish. As a programmer you need to know how that
database functions so you can program to its strengths and try to avoid
its weaknesses.
-Original Message-
From: Geoffrey Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:58 AM
To:
Someone was asking about the command stack, on Universe there is the
@COMMAND.STACK variable that has a dynamic array of the last 99
commands.
Jerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: Unidata Printing Question
Unidata on Windows 2003.
Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are you running?
-Original Message-
From: KidFromBrooklyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 3:23 PM
To: u2-users
Is this some kind of virus?
-Original Message-
From: mark.hennessey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:21 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Available memory exceeded
You have received an important delivery from mark.hennessey
Please pick up
It's only in the SAVEDLISTS file after you log out. While you are
processing it is in one of the SYSTEM() fields.
-Original Message-
From: David Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Stacker commands
try and force it tomorrow time permitting, but the system I have is
not
heavily loaded and replication is not guaranteed.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: 12 July 2007 13:37
To: u2-users
This is an excellent video getting lots of coverage (almost 5,000
hits/day) - showing failover from one datacenter to another, using HP
Linux Clusters w/ServiceGuard, HP-UX Clusters w/ServiceGuard, NonStop
clusters, VMSclusters, and Windows clusters - using StorageEssentials to
easily show the
Either your printers internal setup is different or the driver/script
you are using on your system is different from the others. All I can say
is, you have to do some changes to one or the other.
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 10:32 AM
What are you running?
-Original Message-
From: KidFromBrooklyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 3:23 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: Unidata Printing Question
We tried different settings.
Do you have any other ideas ?
Jerry Banker wrote
John,
You've said this before. Could you elaborate a little more on this? We
run many tasks on cron as root and have never had any problems both with
Solaris and Linux.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 6:19 PM
To:
Fairly simple; The iconv opens up a worm hole sends the date information
through to a super computer in the future which cranks out an answer and
sends it back to the iconv a fraction of a second later.
-Original Message-
From: MAJ Programming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
I'm sure you would unless you move them using uvbackup and uvrestore.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Boydell, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 8:18 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Copying from AIX box to Linux box
Won't you still need
Zeller's Congruence finds the day of the week and, at least on UV, isn't
the same as what we use. It is 0 - 6, 0 is Saturday, and UV is 1 - 7, 1
is Monday.
-Original Message-
From: MAJ Programming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:17 AM
To:
I have seen where the system automatically creates a new index when it
encounters an error. I have two sets of indices right now on my system.
We didn't create them so the system must have.
I_CUST.HIST.XR00
I_CUST.HIST.XREF
I_CUST.MS00
I_CUST.MSTR
I've checked the SET.INDEX and the 00 files are
This is one of many reasons to do all reading and writing to the
database by using subroutines built on the database.
-Original Message-
From: Hona, David S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:49 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UD Backups -
No, it looks like he is trying to assign a name to a variable and then
using that variable to hold the opened file which is illegal in the
language. It may be possible with literal equates but I doubt it. The
reason for the data type error is because the variable F.NAME was
already defined as the
Susan,
The command is flavor dependent.
Pick, Reality, and IN2 use:
CREATE.FILE DATA filename mod,sep,type
Prime and Ideal use:
CREATE.FILE DATA filename type mod sep
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Susan Joslyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 12:36 PM
To:
Is there any problem running processes on other operating system, Red
Hat in particular? We have several cron jobs that run UV processes.
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:54 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE:
No, they're looking for a woman :-)
-Original Message-
From: john reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 7:52 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [AD] UniVerse Programmer needed in New Jersey
'Must be able to mutitask'
Is that like having the
them. There's
actually a lot of new blood. We just have to find them and invite them
inside.
- Chuck
Ron Hutchings wrote:
Has anyone actually run across someone with only 1-5 years
experience?
__
From: Jerry Banker
Does it work with ssh?
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 3:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Device Licensing
As others have posted:
Device Licensing works for both U2 databases as long as you have a
I know this question has come up before but there have been many new
developments in Universe including a whole new release so I'm going to
ask it anyway. Also I know that it sometimes it's a matter of what you
have been taught.
What is the best way to get information to and from a SQLServer
Basically it has to do with PCI. We are putting all of our card data on
a secure encrypted SQLServer so we can access the data from all of our
applications. The records will most likely be in one table and we will
want to read the data, record by record, or write it, record by record,
using UV.
Something like PRC? Contact Susan through http://www.sjplus.com/
-Original Message-
From: Herve Balestrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:23 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Basic developments reverse engineering tool ?
To clarify the
Server 2005 Database Engine by using the following open standards:
HTTP, SOAP, WSDL, blah, blah, blah...
So maybe you can use Universe's callHTTP.
Good Luck!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9
Strange, I never received a reply from you.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Leach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:00 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] The best way to access SQLServer from UV [not-secure]
Jerry
Sorry I send my previous
encrypted UV server? (I
believe the latest version of UV does native encryption ... :-)
If it's not a 1-1 record-row match, then SQL-Server will be unlikely
to match UV for speed.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 June 2007 16:20
To: u2
Does the same thing happen when you use SELECT filename SAVING [UNIQUE]
field NO.NULLS?
I'm not on Unidata so I can't try it. Universe doesn't have the BSELECT
command.
@SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE only returns 0 on a select so we use @SELECTED which
does return the full amount in the select list.
I admit I don't know anything about NTBackup but over the years I have
seen enough backups to wonder if your data is of a different type. Any
backup will run slower if it has to open and close a lot of small files
as opposed to large files. Is it possible that the UD server as several
type 19
The best way to do that is to build a paragraph or sentence that kicks
off the phantom then run it from the dos prompt.
Example:
The paragraph in the VOC file would be:
TEST.PARA
0001: PA
0002: PHANTOM TEST.PROGRAM
0003: Q
From the DOS prompt change to the Universe account and start the
phantom:
That would use up the license for the length of the process. The only
way to not use an additional license is to run a phantom from a process
that is already using a license. If your business is this tight on
licenses I would suggest you buy more. If your processes aren't running
you're out of
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:24 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: [UD] BSELECT @SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE anomaly
Does the same thing happen when you use SELECT filename
SAVING [UNIQUE] field NO.NULLS?
I'm not on Unidata so I can't try
: Anthony W. Youngman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 4:32 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Trigger(s) on distributed file
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We use distributed files and yes a master file is created
We use distributed files and yes a master file is created. The DEFINE.DF
command creates a type 27 file and a dictionary file is created that is
a type 30 file.
As a matter of fact we use the one dictionary for all of the part files.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Youngman
UV doesn't have the name on SYSTEM(48). The phantom ID on our system is
a combination of the program name, the time, and the date. You could
build the ID in the program using SYSTEM(12) and DATE().
PH.ID = 'programname_':FIELD(SYSTEM(12),'.',1):'_':DATE()
Or
PH.ID = 'programname_'@TIME:'_':@DATE
Why not just use unibasic? Just copy the files to a type 19 file
accessible from u2 and do what you want to do.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Merrall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:10 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unix cat help
On
I just came across what may be a bug in HASH.HELP. I ran HASH.HELP on a
static hash file and it told me the smallest modulus should be 80015
(yes, not a prime number), smallest separation or 4, and the best type
of 10.
I then ran HASH.HELP.DETAIL on the same file and got 80021, 4, and 18
Sorry I forgot the subject line the first time. I've also tested this on
our Linux system running the same revision with the same results.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:58 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject
The DF header file doesn't contain any data. You can resize each of the
part files individually. However if your algorithm is correct the files
will probably be close to the same size.
-Original Message-
From: Moderator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 7:50 AM
To:
Who told you that you couldn't use 64 bit files?
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Youngman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:14 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] - Distributed Files
Maintain it against the part files (mind you, I'd just
If I remember correctly, and tell me if things have changed, indexed
I-descriptors and correlatives that do translates from other files do
not update indexes. This is one reason for building indexes
periodically.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The other address I was using was an hotmail account. Because of the
amount of spam that is generated from spammers phishing gmane (I
believe) I didn't want my work email swamped. Unfortunately the list
would send to the address but it wouldn't allow me to respond. I've had
better luck with the
Seems kind of silly to me considering we will have to keep our lights on
in the morning for a longer period of time and this is suppose to save
energy?? People will be driving in the dark that normally don't which
will cause more accidents. We will all have to buy new appliances that
automatically
You're setting NO.NULLS on that field, could this be your problem.
By the way, what are you using for your email? You can hardly read the
message with all of the =0D=0A codes in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Franklin
Sent:
Why not ask Wendy at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donnie Jacobs
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:31 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [u2][uv]HTTPS requests with createSecureRequest
Hi all,
I'm trying
I spotted at least 2 errors in your program. One is the locate where you
are locating on the first field but inserting into fields. It should be:
locate Part in Part.Arrayby 'AL' setting posn else null
insPart before Part.Arrayposn
If you want to insert into a field array and
If they are HP printers or can be seen by the WebJetAdmin then you can
use the Web JetAdmin software from HP. It will notify you when you are
set up as one of the printer administrators. It's also free.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Look at the REQUIRE.SELECT or SELECT.ONLY keywords.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Sadlier
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:41 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Select Lists in Proverb
I need to be able to see if a
I meant it in the technical term mentioned by the others not in the
derogatory sense. I assure you that I am not of that ilk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:56 PM
To:
But doesn't this leave the information readily available to the friendly
neighborhood cracker?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J
Glorfield
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:41 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX
. It's only the
employees
that can't be trusted.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX question (United States only, I believe)
But doesn't
Why does IBM send me alerts that document information is available but
after I get on their site they won't let me read it. I have a couple of
different logins on their site and I never know which one is necessary
to get to where. Why not have one login that allows you to get to what
they want to
Here, here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Results
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:06 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UV - tech support
A few notes:
The problem with IBm is that IBM isn't IBM. It is a series of
That's the new name for Redback.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:47 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] U2 Web Product
Apologies, but never heard of it. What is it?
Karl
I thought you wanted it printed from Unidata?
-Original Message-
From: John Varney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:29 AM
To: Jerry Banker
Subject: RE: [U2] MICR fonts with UniData
I wish I could do it that way, but the checks are coming directly from
a unix box
I've found that if a login paragraph starts getting too complicated it's
best to start using a program.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Login
Try this in the /bin directory:
-r-sr-sr-x 37 root bin 5256 Jan 5 2000 ipcs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:50 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV
I have found that the easiest way is to do a UVBackup to a file, copy it
to the new server with ftp or better yet if you can mount the file
system do a cp or copy, then UVRestore the file. The restore does the
conversion so fnuxi is not necessary.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
And UNIVAC had a 90 column binary coded card, it was not Hollerith
coded.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:04 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] FOLD can mutilate
Your server was down and it bounced a couple of times before delivery.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Has anyone heard of this problem? Over the weekend we build the indices
for all of our indexed files. One of the builds hung up this past
weekend which stopped any further processing because the file being
indexed was one of our most used files. The process started normally by
locking the file to
I forgot to mention we are on UV 10.1.12 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS
release 3 (Taroon Update 5) Kernel 2.4.21-32.EL on an x86_64
From: Jerry Banker
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:01 PM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: UV - Build.Index problem
What is the proper way to use the USING keyword in a list? It doesn't
seem to work as stated in the manual unless I am using (no pun intended)
wrong. According to the manual this is how the command is used.
LIST [DICT | USING [DICT] dictname] filename [records | FROM n]
[selection]
If you have an index on the file the index is already sorted so all you
have to do is use the index when you select. The only criteria would be
that the index is on the key or a field that will include all of the
records or NO.NULLS is off.
Example:
SELECT CUST.MSTR BY CLIENT.6 SAMPLE 2
Will give
Don't chain to off. Just stop the program and it will release.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott, Dave
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:56 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Phantom job started from another phantom job
A
Since you seem to know a little about distributed (as opposed to
multi-data files), I have a question. What do you do with year 2000?
I've recently gotten into distributed files and was wondering how others
treat year 0 records. Can there be a part number 0?
-Original Message-
From:
Tom,
Maybe this is what you are looking for. @TTY will equal a lower case
'phantom' for phantom jobs. We use this to keep phantoms from going
through our login program. All of the output from the commands in a
phantom can be found in the PH file with the program name with date
and time as the key.
Leave the Nebula- on the address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Armstrong
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 11:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] xls to text
I removed removethisNebula- but still couldn't find it.
101 - 200 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
