There is also Easysoft which seems to be a good one. I've tested it but have
not put it into production yet.
There seems to be more action being done at getting things from the U2
environment then the other way around. What we are doing here is the other
way around, trying to get data from SQL
Your code doesn't test for the type of lock. It could be just a shared
record lock which would allow another user to get in.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman,
That's and old Pick Basic command, it's been replaced by KEYIN() in
Universe.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Armstrong
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:05 AM
To:
Just so there is no question , below is the output of a simple test
program ,
Note that the INSERTs fail on bad data as they should but
OPENCHECK/WRITE ICHECK do not.
Bad data is definitely being written into the table.
OS Info :
.L RELLEVEL
RELLEVEL
001 X
002 10.1.8
003 NEWACC
004
005
INPUT ANS,1
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ferries
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Press any key to
My test program uses OPENCHECK so the setting if this parameter should
not be having any effect.
However, just to stoke the fire, I have verified via uvconfig CONFIG
DATA that we do have OPENCHK set to '1' !!
So we should be seeing data constraint errors being reported by
OPEN/WRITE ,
I am revisiting some tests we did with sql'izing universe tables.
When I 1st looked at this, as I remember, it was a problem because once
a file became a table, all 'file' updates ( write ) were subject to data
type verification - a problem because on this legacy system data
consistency was not a
Yes I know about the OPENCHECK config setting which was why I was
intentionally using the OPENCHECK statement.
What you are saying seems to agree with how I thought things should
work, however, even when using OPENCHECK, I am able to write complete
garbage to an SQL table column defined as a DATE
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: April 28, 2008 2:59 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse SQL Tables
Not unless you've written a ten line test program to prove that.
On Apr 27, 2008, at 10:50 PM, u2ug wrote:
Can we safely assume that any file writes
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of u2ug
Sent: April 28, 2008 8:54 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse SQL Tables
Yes I know about the OPENCHECK config setting which was why I was
intentionally using the OPENCHECK statement.
What you
What was your old revision? If this was changed then it was changed for the
worst.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Bergsagel
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:12 PM
As far as I know it's always worked that way. Question, the copies you made
before, were they on the same system? If so you were using the same indices
for both your live and copied data. Usually this causes some strange results
when using the indices.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM
Why not go paperless and email the reports to an email repository? We email
most of our reports now to the various individuals that need them. When they
receive them they can squirrel them away in their little cubby holes or
delete them. Most don't delete them. The report name is on the subject
You could try looking here:
http://jes.com/picklist.html
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:05 AM
To:
It seems that everyone needs to be a specialist these days, even in our
business.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Thursday, April 17,
If I remember correctly, Solaris only looks at the first 8 characters as the
user name and the password. If you have a password longer than 8 characters
you're wasting keystrokes. I don't know if there is a setting to change it.
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions
Have you tried to old 'ED' editor?
Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:37 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Testing a new email address.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Is the list down or have I once again been unsubscribed ?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Sent: February 20, 2008 10:28 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] is there anybody out there ?
Yes...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:40 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Also, if Bob is logged in on session 1 and Bob is also logged in again
on session 2 , Bob2 has no visibility to Bob1's named common and vice
versa.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: February 12, 2008 11:39 AM
To:
Brain freeze - can someone provide a link to the latest UniDK ?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Sent: January 22, 2008 10:07 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniDK
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?go=yrs=u2trial
s
Jerry Banker
-Original Message-
From: gerry-u2ug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:03 AM
To: u2
hohoho
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
VAL=TRANS(FILENAME,RECORDID,FIELDNUMBER,OPTIONS)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: December 7, 2007 08:04 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Paragraph
Is there a way to read from a file from within a
Oops - never mind
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: December 7, 2007 09:06 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Paragraph
VAL=TRANS(FILENAME,RECORDID,FIELDNUMBER,OPTIONS)
-Original Message
Good article.
I would have to say though that this really only addresses those 100%
'dragdrop' programmers.
There is nothing that prevents one from using 100% vanilla HTML directly
or through the HTML controls ( as opposed to the ASP.NET web controls ).
Getting away from styling controls using
Nothing runs 'ON' FireFox.
ASP.NET code running on a web server generates HTML that is requested
and interpreted by client browsers. Its up to the programmer to ensure
that the generated HTML renders properly on any particular client
browser just the same as it is with any other type HTML
VS.NET 2008, right click on page.aspx - Browse with ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: December 3, 2007 11:02 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] .net versus VS
Will .Net code run on FireFox?
ASP.NET
Hi Marcos, what version of universe are you running ?
We used to use the index w subroutine method you describe but this is
now gone in favour of native universe triggers. We have many files in
universe with triggers on them , there is no requirement to SQL'ize the
table and believe me these
Not sure what error you are seeing but here are some notes on my
experience with the universe soap API.
I wrote my own CallSoapService subroutine to handle the following UV
Soap API bugs/issues.
- adds namespace to method tags but not parameter tags
Solution : add option to
I don't know either - this thread is the 1st time I ever heard that one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: July 25, 2007 02:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [u2] : Cleaner Case Statement
Someone
more than a socket
call on a given port and IP address expecting a specific packet.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:33 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Soap
Thanks to everyone that responded to my SOAP questions.
Now it's on to some XML processing.
I am having some problem understanding how to get the XMAPAppendRec()
function to work properly.
Leaving out all of the gory details , basically I have XML.map XML.ext
files setup to allow parsing of the
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:09 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] From SOAP on to XML
Thanks to everyone that responded to my SOAP questions.
Now it's on to some XML processing.
I am having some problem understanding how to get
Calling a webservice using SoapSetParameters , SoapSubmitRequest
There seems to be a limit of about 16K where any parameters exceeding
this size get jumbled up - using SoapRequestWrite it looks like some
sort of buffer overwrite going on.
I can get around this by manually building the entire soap
Thanks Tony, but ...
the web services we use are .NET, the HelloWorld example I used took
less than minutes to setup. We also have inbound and outbound web
services that use UO.NET. I'm not sure why we would want to pay for an
additional framework for such a simple thing. Currently 90% of this
We ran into such a situation way back, the problem was the unix
environment variable SHLIB_PATH was not being set ( /usr/uv/bin ) .
For user logins this can be done in your .profile but for other non-user
processes ( phantom , uv-odbc , uniobjects etc ) I believe that this
needs to be set before
raise() lower() are your friends
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: March 8, 2007 9:10 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] old dog, new tricks
snip /
Also, I think UV is optimized for AMs vs VMs, so
sum(sum()) ? How about summation()
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAJ Programming
Sent: March 7, 2007 8:50 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] SUM Function
Did we not confuse this person with too much of an answer.
Now here is a prime candidate for submission to interpol et al.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
The RQM statement has not appeared in any universe documentation at
least as far back v6. I actually had to locate some old prime manuals
to find out what this was statement was all about. I recall reading
some blurb somewhere that although RQM is still supported by the
universe compiler it is
something about this long-standing
runtime problem, rather than creating a new structure that improves the
performance of the work-around we all use?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 1:21 PM
Locally scoped variables complex , difficult , hard to understand ?
Wow. Welcome to the 1980's.
Even 'simple' scripting languages have employed this fundamental
programming concept for quite some time.
Honestly, anyone needing an answer to the 'why' ... never mind ;-)
The lack of locally scoped
Woohoo - I bin so lonelys
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rimshot
Sent: December 12, 2006 1:18 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] [Fwd: Welcome Back]
All,
Sorry for the problems. We should now be fully
Hi ,
I missed the beginning of this thread.
However we were having the problem of XDOMOpen returning -1 with an
empty error message when invoked via a uvcs session .
Our problem turned out to be the SHLIB_PATH environment variable was not
being set.
As I recall this needs to be set during system
Sure - search for something at that URL , say something like universe
.net, get the list of applicable docs, try to access one of the docs,
get a login.
I even have a var supplied login that lets me search for 'restricted'
items only to ask for a more restrictive login - WTF
I hear the VAR
Cleardata ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: October 25, 2006 1:48 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] How to clear pushed data?
This is for UV.
I'm using the DATA ... ; followed by EXECUTE ...
to force
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
In the documentation I am looking at , right above the excerpt you are
quoting it says :
An insert file of equate names is provided for the SELECTINFO keys.
To use the
Equate names, specify the directive $INCLUDE UNIVERSE.INCLUDE
INFO_KEYS.INS.BAS
When you compile your program.
I
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please
Hi Tony ,
Thanks for the friendly response ;)
One comment just for the record, I may be 'up here' but the 'company of
retro developers' is actually from 'down there'.
Gerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: July 7,
IMO IBM is pretty messed up in this regard.
I recently ran into the same situation where we are no longer allowed to
access IBM directly and had to go through a VAR. They eventually agreed
to set us up an account so that we could at least perform searches on
the IBM web site. After that was
agreed but support and access to information are 2 completely different
issues.
Pretty much any MS documentation you can dream of is freely available
online to anyone who wants it.
Btw - you do not have to pay to report a bug with MS, you *may* have to
pay to get a fix, but that is pretty
Sounds like an idea - but I would scrap the whole login issue altogether
- just make it all public.
push the product
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Results
Sent: July 7, 2006 14:06
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UV
Hi Tony ,
I will probably regret this post - I never seem to get past one or 2
before the jumping down of throats begins ;-)
While I agree with what you say as far as support is concerned ( and I
still stand by my statement that there is now and never has been any
cost to report a bug to MS ,
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
for an I
descriptor, but it couldn't handle it. The display was blank. Am I
trying to do too much using the dictionary?
gerry-u2ug wrote:
A 15 second I-Descriptor :
NOTES[INDEX(NOTES,COMBO YS ,1)+9,6]
If the length of the data you are after is variable to the end of the
field
I set up a document server ( web service ) for a customer that accepts
an xml doc that can be saved , emailed ( as body or attachment ) ,
faxed or printed.
It supports multiple output formats for saved / attached documents such
as - .pdf .htm .xls .rpt .rtf and can handle any combination of
From the docs : if delimiter evaluates to more than one character, the
first character is used.
1 reuse is not required.
2 fields works on FM delimited data so should be
lower(FIELDS(raise(ATTNAME),YS ,2))
3 this won't work either way as the delimiter will be Y not COMBO YS
-Original
All,
We need your feedback. I just received this very generous offer
from Nathan Rector (International Spectrum). We need to know who can
attend, sooner the better. For the NJ event, I can commit to chairing
the meeting. We are looking for a board member (past or present) to host
the Ohio
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Janet Bond wrote:
Hello Bob,
We are a company that has been creating and providing integration
software for the MultValue
Which editor ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of u2ug
Sent: June 17, 2006 10:50
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: Steve Kunzman
Subject: [U2] [UD] weird message in editor
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER: Steve Kunzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am
, Moderator
U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:46 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] CREATE.BFILE filetype
Stupid brainfart question (?) :
we had things configured so that CREATE.BFILE created type 19
files. sometime recently the command has reverted to creating
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
--
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e
and after all the flap , Ibm u2 support still doesn't know how to set up
out of office not to respond to lists - or at least this list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Shannon
Sent: May 5, 2006 08:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
A couple of out-of-office replies flooding the list with replies to
themselves
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: May 2, 2006 09:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Forum General Question
So why was it
, Moderator
U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL
REPOSTED FOR: Glen Batchelor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are using 39 or 3 of 9 symbology, then try changing it to Code 128.
We found that some handheld CCD and laser scanners misread code 39 if the bar
spacing and bar sizes are not perfectly matched and spaced. Code 128 has yet to
fail on me from
your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
just as amusing as the fact the list ever had to be changed in the
first place for pretty much the same type of reason.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claus Derlien
Sent: April 12, 2006 03:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: SV:
of their job function. It is not about the intelligence of
the list moderator(s). It is not about the intelligence of the list
host, who DOES THIS FOR FREE. (Always a hot button of mine.)
I happen to disagree with the current list configuration. And it has
been taken up with the Board of U2UG
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Hi ,
Its been 3 or 4 days since I've received anything from the list.
Is it dead ?
Or have I been magically unsubscribed again ?
Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
info ideal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 11, 2006 09:39
To: U2
Subject: [U2] survey
What flavors of universe are people using? I've only ever seen
applications running on universe in pick flavor, but
I think the list admin is an idiot and the
people who can't filter whiners.
My .02.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:21 AM
To: gerry-u2ug; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2
-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe
http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users
I have a subroutine that accepts an xml document and processes it using
the XDOM/XMAP routines
When this routine is called from an interactive user session or from a
phantom process it works.
But if the routine is called from UniObjects session ( @TTY=uvcs )
XDOMOpen returns XML.ERROR
Calling
Thanks John - anything you can dig up would be greatly appreciated.
If you can point me in the direction of where look for this info that
would be good as well.
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 5, 2006 16:50
To: gerry-u2ug
Subject: RE: [U2
That's where the tool is but not any documentation
From a little playing with this it seems pretty useless anyway.
Although with the proper docs I might think otherwise.
Gerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron White
Sent: April 4,
I think that I have all of the xml mapping issues figured out.
I can receive and process an xml document using both the XMLData
functions and the XDOM/XMAP functions
The only issue I have run into concerns the handling of dictionary item
conversions
1 - conversions seem to ignored
Thanks for the suggestion , but this is on universe not unidata - I
guess I forgot to mention that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 4, 2006 16:12
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Xml
I am finally breaking down and looking into universe's built in xml
processing.
The client is running universe 10.1.8 on hpux B.11.11
I set up a simple test using basic PrepareXML , OpenXMLData
ReadXmlData commands
On the PrepareXML statement, I get the following errors :
Can't load
Can anyone tell me where the documentation for this tool can be found ?
I find references stating that it is part of the basic extensions manual
but I don't see it there or anywhere else in the help files for that
matter.
Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
.
--
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail
access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org,
enter your e-mail address,
and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please
Let's move this to U2-Community. END OF THREAD on U2-Users.
Charles Barouch, Moderator
U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions
Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org, enter your e-mail address, and 'browse all'
lists to maintain your access.
---
u2-users
201 - 300 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
