RE: [U2] Questions about addRequestParameter

[Adrian Matthews]

Theres a good example of this on www.pickwiki.com

We use a similiar system for address verification and debit/credit card
payments. Performance is more than adequate.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Lunt
Sent: Mon 16/05/2005 23:19
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Questions about addRequestParameter



Hi All Esteemed Ones,

I have been investigating using callhttp to send addresses to the web for
address verification and the documentation is leaving me a little
unfulfilled.

If I am understanding things correctly, I first do:
createRequest(URL, http_method, request_handle)
Then, I would add the address fields one by one to this by issuing:
addRequestParameter(request_handle, parameter_name, parameter_value,
content_handling)
for as many fields as I have to validate.
Finally, I would do:
submitRequest(request_handle, time_out, post_data, response_headers,
response_data, http_status). The response_headers and response_data vars
would have my reply. In this case it is XML.


I am assuming that the request_handle is used by all three processes but I
cannot see what is being done with it. I don't know whether it is correct or
not.

And finally, can anyone tell me if this is even worth pursuing? Is it fast
enough to use with data-entry? Or should I be looking into another method?

Thanks,

R. Bruce Lunt

HP/UX v. 11
Unidata v. 6.0
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Access Violation

[Adrian Matthews]

I use fixtool rather than uvfixfile on Windows as that seems to find
more errors.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 16 May 2005 14:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Access Violation

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

I ran UVFIXFILE on the files used, but it didn't state that any had an
error.

Is there anything else I should try with this to check for it being
corrupt?

Thanks


Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 May 2005 13:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Access Violation

We tend to get that error when there is a corrupted file. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 16 May 2005 11:40
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Access Violation

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hi,

We have an application running on a Windows machine that telnets to a
Universe server (running on Windows), calls a Universe program that
changes a flag value in one of our files and then logs off. It does this
about 900 times in one night, once a month.

This worked fine until recently where the Universe program appears to
fall over and cause the whole thing to stop.

The only error we are getting is in the Windows event manager and is as
follows:


Unhandled Exception raised at address 0x00405455 : Access violation.
Attempted to read from address 0x009BF000.  Binary data is processor
CONTEXT structure

Unfortunately support say this is a general error and could be caused by
many problems.

Anyone here seen this before or have any ideas on how we could fix this?

Thanks



Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support: http://tracker.selima.co.uk <http://tracker.selima.co.uk/>
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then
delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that
do not relate to the official business of this company shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and
IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Access Violation

[Adrian Matthews]

That would seem point to some sort of group error in the file that is
being updated.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 16 May 2005 14:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Access Violation

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

I could try this, but the process doesn't seem to fail until about an
hour or two in to the run, so that's a lot of commands.

The first however many flag changes in the first couple of hours are
fine, after that it fails.

Thanks


Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Mongiovi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 May 2005 14:04
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Access Violation

> We have an application running on a Windows machine that telnets to a 
> Universe server (running on Windows), calls a Universe program that

If you run the process from a console window, sometimes you can get more
messages about why it's failing ..
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Access Violation

[Adrian Matthews]

We tend to get that error when there is a corrupted file. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 16 May 2005 11:40
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Access Violation

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hi,

We have an application running on a Windows machine that telnets to a
Universe server (running on Windows), calls a Universe program that
changes a flag value in one of our files and then logs off. It does this
about 900 times in one night, once a month.

This worked fine until recently where the Universe program appears to
fall over and cause the whole thing to stop.

The only error we are getting is in the Windows event manager and is as
follows:


Unhandled Exception raised at address 0x00405455 : Access violation.
Attempted to read from address 0x009BF000.  Binary data is processor
CONTEXT structure

Unfortunately support say this is a general error and could be caused by
many problems.

Anyone here seen this before or have any ideas on how we could fix this?

Thanks



Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support: http://tracker.selima.co.uk 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV][SB+] foreign character-set support

[Adrian Matthews]

Ross,

How are you storing the Chinese characters if you're not using NLS?

We use NLS and wIntegrate with Chinese characters and found the reverse
problem that without NLS we couldn't get the characters in and out of
Universe without lots of custom encoding and decoding.

Adrian Matthews
IG Index

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: 28 April 2005 09:48
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV][SB+] foreign character-set support

Mike,

"what" are you looking to do here ? Are you looking at storing data with
these extended character sets ? and/or "simply" displaying
screens/reports with tags appropriate for the language/country (eg: a
Brit would probably prefer to see an English screen, rather than French
or German)

I can't speak for SB+ (never used it), though I thought it did have some
language translation features - at the DBMS level you MIGHT need NLS as
well (though we actually found it "got in the way" when dealing with
multi-byte (Chinese) character sets)

The problem you point out with the mailer underscores the nee to ensure
you have the "right" codepages loaded on the client, but I assume that
will b the case 4U

Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage - an Evolution in Software Development


>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Farrant
>Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 11:20 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] [UV][SB+] foreign character-set support
>
>Clearly the engine for this mail-list is re-interpreting the characters
>I am trying to send.  This kind of epitomizes the problem I am having!
>
>Mike Farrant
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Farrant
>Sent: 27 April 2005 13:13
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: [U2] [UV][SB+] foreign character-set support
>
>Has anyone any experience in setting up users in places where the
>language involves the use of extend characters such as i m a } > x h h
9
>l?
>
>I am currently using:
>Hostaccess terminal emulator
>or SB Client v4.5
>HP-UX B.11.11
>Universe 9.6.1.6
>SB+ 3.4.0/7
>
>Unix, Universe and SB+ is shared with other sites across Europe so we
>need some way of having a localized login/configuration for our people
>in the countries that use these extended character sets.
>
>If anyone can offer any help I'd greatly appreciate it.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mike Farrant
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] ODBC text field

[Adrian Matthews]

If you're using ODBC won't the multivalue be normalised into a separate
table?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 April 2005 10:24
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] ODBC text field

I am having trouble importing a multivalued field into SQL via odbc. I
would like to remove all control characters (including value marks) from
the string. I have tried using an I-Type with OCONV but this failed. 

I would be grateful if anyone could share how they have done this.

Thanks

Graham
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UD 6.0] Address verification calls to the web

[Adrian Matthews]

We do this on Universe with a mixture of HTTP requests, XML and CORBA
services.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baakkonen,
Rodney
Sent: 22 April 2005 13:56
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD 6.0] Address verification calls to the web

Might be something that you could do with MQ Series. It seems to run on
a
lot of different hardware. I don't know a lot about SOAP. But I think it
is
a request to exchange information. I think you could set up one MQ queue
to
send the request. And another to receive the response. You would need
some
type of tracking number to match the original request to the response.
MQ
has the added feature that if one of the servers is down, the messages
just
queue up until the down server is back.

-Original Message-
From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:39 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UD 6.0] Address verificcation calls to the web


Hi All,

I have seen a bunch of postings on this list lately about linking
Unidata 
(and Universe) to the outside world but I am not sure if the answers
that I 
am looking for have been talked about, or not. So, finally, I am going
to 
ask the question.

We would like to subscribe to an address verification service on the
web. 
When an address is entered or changed on our system, we want to send a
call 
to a web-service. We do approx. 150,000 address entries per month. (Some

month's will be bigger than that and some month's will be less than
that) We

have considered and rejected scrubbing our entire database of addresses.
It 
was thought that only the currently active addresses need to be
corrected 
and if an old customer decides to become active again, we'll verify them
at 
that time. The service that we think we're going to go with uses SOAP,
if 
that helps.

Has this type of interface been done already? If so, how did you do it?
I 
mean, can you make the calls directly from UniBasic or did you create a 
flat-file and export it to Unix first? If you export it to Unix, did you
use

Perl? Or some other tool? Also, this whole process needs to be pretty
quick 
since it is a Order-entry screen.

We would appreciate any help that you all can offer!

Thanks in advance,

R. Bruce Lunt
408.832.1900 cell
925.924.2132 office
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series

[Adrian Matthews]

Where I think IBM has messed up a bit with the new phantom licensing is
that it doesn't respect device licensing.

I can start 10 sessions using wIntegrate or UniObjects and only consume
one license, but if I start 10 mq phantoms (or any other license
consuming functionality) then I consume 10 licenses.

Also the device licenses can't be shared around between wIntegrate and
UniObjects.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett
Sent: 21 April 2005 00:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] IBM Licensing Requirement - MQ Series

I amazed that in this discussion noone has mentioned the IBM MQSeries 
interface that has been added to U2.

It is now easy to write a phantom which monitors a queue for messages 
and processes them. These messages could be for batch processing, but 
they could equally be for client/server data exchange.

Each MQ phantom consumes a licence, but 10 such phantoms serving a queue

could support many more than 10 client/server or web users.

Having provided the functionality, I can't believe IBM want to say "You 
can use this, but not for client/server applications".


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Logon Banner

[Adrian Matthews]

As far as I know it's stored in the registry on WIN2K. Doesn't help with
the linefeed though.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Woodward
Sent: 14 April 2005 23:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Logon Banner

Update: Still no joy.  I've tried everything that has been suggested and
the only one that "works" is the padding of the message on a single line
with lots of white space to simulate starting on the next line.  I
imagine there is a line length limit in doing this and this won't work
for a mixed environment where some users are 80 characters wide and
others are 132 wide.

Each change attempted, I stopped telnet service, saved the change, then
restarted telnet.  I then started a new telnet session through Dynamic
Connect and see the modifications, just not the desired results.

The \ commands are just displayed as normal characters and modifying
msg.text did not have any effect.

I guess I'm going to make a call to IBM.  Thanks everyone for your
suggestions and ideas.  I'll post what I end up with by going directly
to IBM on this.

BobW


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Mongiovi
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:23 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Logon Banner
> 
> I'm on UV 9.6/NT .. I found a file in the UV root directory called
> "msg.txt"
> with a message at the bottom numbered "TLS001" .. Try using notepad to
> change the text there to:
> 
> "Welcome to my system.\r\n\r\nBe sure to read your email.\r\n"
> 
> -Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Clark
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:59 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Logon Banner
> 
> 
> looks like it's printing a line feed, but not a carriage return. Try
> putting
> in a \r
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Woodward
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:17 PM
> To: U2-Users List
> Subject: [U2] Logon Banner
> 
> 
> I hope this is a simple question.  When going into Uniadmin, in the
> Network Services/Telnet window, the Logon banner at the bottom.  I'm
> wanting to put in multiple lines.  When I do, and I log into the
server,
> I'm getting what looks like a line-feed only, and not the associated
> carriage return.  What I want is something like:
> 
> 
> 
> Welcome to my system.
> 
> Be sure to read your email.
> 
> 
> 
> What I'm getting, instead, is:
> 
> 
> 
> Welcome to my system.
> 
>   Be sure to read your mail.
> 
> 
> 
> (I hope the font show up correctly.)  I've tried things like /n, ^L,
> double returns, but so far nothing is any better.  The help screen is
> totally useless and I've not been able to come up with any kind of
> Google search that gets me any further.
> 
> 
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> 
> Bob W
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV - Using an Access for to view/update UV?

[Adrian Matthews]

I did this for a client several years ago (they asked).

I used ODBC with the external tables defined in Access. Was pretty slow
but very easy to do.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: 13 April 2005 14:06
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Using an Access for to view/update UV?

OK... Stupid question time.

Assuming a relatively small Access database (Access 2000), what would it
take to have the existing (err, modified) forms currently used in Access
to view/update data in a UniVerse database?  What method would be
easiest to deploy?

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Select returning mv'd list

[Adrian Matthews]

Try QSELECT file key SAVING fieldno

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: 13 April 2005 13:46
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select returning mv'd list

Tried that.  No dice.  What I got was the key to the record and
extraneous multivalue information (pointers). 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Lakeland
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:31 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select returning mv'd list

Try exploding the attribute

SELECT FILE.A 'Key' BY.EXP F1 SAVING F1

RE
ANDY

-Original Message-
From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2005 01:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Select returning mv'd list

Universe 9.6, I want to select a record from a file and return a mv'd
list of information in attribute 1, each attribute as a separate list
element.  On Unidata, I can:
 
SELECT FILE.A 'key' F1
 
...and it'll return all the values in F1 as individual items in the
active select list.  On Universe, this does not work.  So I tried: 
 
SELECT FILE.A 'key' SAVING UNIQUE F1
 
...and I get all the items, but they come in one attribute, mv'd, not
split out on each line like Unidata would.
 
I've also tried QSELECT, but apparently the option to QSELECT a single
attribute from a file is not supported here here.
 
How do you select a record from a file and return a mv'd list from an
attribute in that record?

-Kevin
HYPERLINK "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.6 - Release Date: 4/11/2005
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.6 - Release Date: 4/11/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.6 - Release Date: 4/11/2005
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] NLS - To Display Non English Character at TCL level

[Adrian Matthews]

We're using Chinese support in wIntegrate/Universe and it works very
nicely.

When using NLS ensure that the correct map (if not set as default) is
specified in the SET.TERM.TYPE line. Also any programs that were
compiled prior to installing NLS have to be recompiled.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Robertshaw
Sent: 29 March 2005 11:03
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] NLS - To Display Non English Character at TCL level

IBM's terminal emulator wIntegrate version 6 supports Simplified Chinese
and is certified as GB18030 compliant. (GB18030 is the mandatory
standard for all new software sold in China.)

It is also localized with Simplified Chinese menus, dialogs and
messages, and a Chinese user manual. When the standard wIntegrate 6 CD
from IBM is loaded into a PC running Simplified Chinese Windows, it
shows the menus and product installer in Chinese.

www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/wintegrate/

David Robertshaw

-Original Message-
From: Ang Suan Yong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2005 03:45
To: U2-Users New Lists
Subject: [U2] NLS - To Display Non English Character at TCL level


Dear All,

Is anyone hv experience to display other language character on
the
backend tcl level.


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 27/03/2005
 

This message has been comprehensively scanned for viruses,
please visit http://virus.e2e-filter.com/ for details.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Distributed SELECTs for distributed (Type27) files

[Adrian Matthews]

Certainly on windows running a select on a large file can "take out" an
entire CPU for the duration.

Running multiple selections using partfiles *may* be quicker from the
single user perspective but would tie up more CPU's.

I suppose it's down to what the system is doing at the time. For most
systems using half the CPU's for a query overnight is going to hurt but
would be a major problem in the middle of a busy day.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson,
Charles
Sent: 23 March 2005 04:30
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Distributed SELECTs for distributed (Type27)
files

From: Maresh, Mel
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Distributed SELECTs for distributed (Type30)
files
^^
Type27

> I colleague wrote and used the following code to select from a
> specific distributed file, the GL.DETAIL file.  He loved it, but
> the system administrator has forbidden him from using it because
> it's such a resources hog.   

a resource hog, huh?  Hmmm.
Thanks for the code example.  I think I'd write it as a self-contained
verb rather than writing temporary procs.  The verb would have 2 modes,
one for controlling the distributed select, the other mode for doing the
individual selects on partfiles.

In other words:
[S]SELDIST GL.DETAIL WITH POST.DATE = "3/22"

Program would notice GL.DETAIL was distributed and spawn the multiple
phantoms:

 PHANTOM [S]SELDIST GL.DETAIL_[partno] WITH POST.DATE = "3/22"

then collect the results when phantoms are done.  (JOBS and NOTIFY
commands will probably prove useful.)

When SELDIST executes as a phantom, it would notice that it is dealing
with a partfile, do the [s]select and save the list for its parent pid.
I think I'd use the parent pid to control uniqueness.

Assuming I do it at all.

cds
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Anyone using NETapp disk array for UNiverse on HPUX 11?

[Adrian Matthews]

We run IBM FasTT600 Turbo FC controllers (now DS4300) on our servers. It
is quicker than the old SCSI we used to have but I think most of the
difference we've noticed is down to the 2gb cache rather than the speed
differential of the connection.

For our new server we've followed IBM's recommendation and gone for 80
physical disks (10 per cpu which is the minimum they recommend) this
should really cut down on head contention which has been a major problem
for us up to now.

Also don't forget to use RAID 10 rather than RAID 5.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2005 21:16
To: u2-Users
Subject: [U2] [UV] Anyone using NETapp disk array for UNiverse on HPUX
11?

Hi All,

I'm looking into an external disk array for our Universe DB. We will be
on UV 10 and are running on HPUX 11.0. I'm looking at the NEtapp FAS270c
Fibre Channel SAN disk array.. I'm wondering if anyone is using this
type of device and what type of performance you're getting out of it. We
will be implementing TL'ing and are in need of increased disk
performance..

Thanks a bunch,

Scott
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniObjects Login Problem

[Adrian Matthews]

Anyone upgraded/changed the password security levels on the server since your
last password change?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Don Kibbey
Sent: Mon 3/21/2005 5:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UniObjects Login Problem

For years now I have been using UniObjects (Java, vb and .Net)
versions on an HP-UX server running UniVerse 10.0.6.  In the past
couple of weeks I have noticed that my login no longer works.  I can
still connect to the very same machine via telnet with the same login
info.  UniObjects however won't let me connect unless I use a
different login.  This all started after I changed my password.  Does
UniObjects cache login credentials somewhere on the system?  I've
tried restarting the system and have looked over the pam files for any
changes (none found).

Anyone have any thoughts or hints on this?

Thanks,
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

[Adrian Matthews]

I didn't mean use the PE version. I was stating that I've used the PE version
on other distros of Linux.

What I meant was it would be foolish to run a commercial version of Universe
on an unsupported platform.

Sorry for the obvious confusion.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Sun 20/03/2005 18:10
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2



Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie.
against the law.

IBM might choose to have quite a bit to do with it--via their Legal
Department.


--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~


Adrian Matthews wrote:
> Universe (PE version) works on just about every distro of Linux I've
> tried seemingly without problems.
>
> However I would never dream of using it commercially unless it was on a
> certified platform. Just imagine if it looks ok in testing and then
> starts having major problems under "Live" load. IBM would probably
> (quite rightly) have nothing to do with it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Hilbert
> Sent: 19 March 2005 22:10
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2
>
> Good afternoon to all. My client wishes to use Suse Linux 9.2. IBM does
> not
> officially support this (perhaps will be certified during the second
> half of
> this year). Can anybody out there attest one way or another as to if
> there
> would be problems. I've seen some comments on this list of users using
> Suse
> with the UV-PE but as this would be a 20 user installation I wouldn't
> want to
> lead them down the wrong road.
> Thanks in advance,
> Marc Hilbert
> Tech. Manager
> Pick Professional Center
> Buenos Aires
> Argentina
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>
> The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

[Adrian Matthews]

Universe (PE version) works on just about every distro of Linux I've
tried seemingly without problems.

However I would never dream of using it commercially unless it was on a
certified platform. Just imagine if it looks ok in testing and then
starts having major problems under "Live" load. IBM would probably
(quite rightly) have nothing to do with it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Hilbert
Sent: 19 March 2005 22:10
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

Good afternoon to all. My client wishes to use Suse Linux 9.2. IBM does
not
officially support this (perhaps will be certified during the second
half of
this year). Can anybody out there attest one way or another as to if
there
would be problems. I've seen some comments on this list of users using
Suse
with the UV-PE but as this would be a 20 user installation I wouldn't
want to
lead them down the wrong road.
Thanks in advance,
Marc Hilbert
Tech. Manager
Pick Professional Center
Buenos Aires
Argentina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2]: Epicor

[Adrian Matthews]

Shouldn't this be on community by now?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: 17 March 2005 05:15
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2]: Epicor

We have seen a couple of cases where the CFO has gone to jail for
carrying
out an illegal action.  The CFO gained no financial advantage, whilst
the
CEO who gained the financial advantage actually never went to jail.  In
the
UK a programmer got into serious trouble when programming who got
university
places.  After exhausting a variety of priority issues such as marks to
decide who would get a position, he then made a decision based on skin
colour.  

Programmers are regarded as professional/educated people by the courts
and
the courts view is that a programmer should no better when programming
improper code.  (Ignorance is no excuse) If a programmer modifies the
code
so the CFO does not pay the correct tax, then the court regards the
programmer as an accomplice to the crime.  The court's view is that a
threat
of sacking is not an excuse to commit a crime.

Bill is right some IT people will be in for a horrific shock as they
could
be caught up in fraud, privacy issues, spam and other areas and most
have
not considered their legal implications.

Regards 
David Jordan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill H.
Sent: Thursday, 17 March 2005 5:00 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2]: Epicor

Don:

There are a number or current laws and regulations that attempt to rid
public corporations of this kind of mismanagement.  The result of these
new
regulations may not so much be the reduction of corporate financial and
IT
mismanagement, but the transfer of responsibility to lower level staff.
:-(

It may come to pass that you'll be held personally liable for someone
else's
indiscriminate "business requirements".  For those of us who think it is
our
role to provide others with the ability to trash the integrity of the
organization's financial information; a rude awakening awaits!

Bill

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:15 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2]: Epicor
> 
> Our resident "Bean Counters" have asked for and received 
> several tools from me that will allow them to do the same 
> thing to our system.  It's our job to provide the "sharp 
> knives", the CPA types have to be carefull not to remove 
> appendages with said tools.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] RE:

[Adrian Matthews]

Also don't forget that Universe is a programming language as well as a
database.

In these sorts of cases a lot of people cost the movement of the data
itself and forget all about the cost of developing an application that
can actually do something with it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wong, Howard
Sent: 16 March 2005 13:52
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: 

Trevor,

Indeed your suggestion reflects the views of many who have replied to my
post. It is the least painful and most-certain way for us to make the
data
available for a few more years when the app will eventually be retired.

Since we don't have any knowledge on UV, invariably we'd have to pay for
outside help if we choose to extract the data instead of installing a
new
version of UV. 

Therefore I suspect the costs for both cases may come out to be pretty
close. In any case, it will be the manager's call.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Regards, 
Howard Wong
Asset Management
416-784-8728
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Trevor Ockenden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:25 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: 


Dear Howard

VMark was the company that developed the UniVerse Data Base product for
which I have had much to do with for many years.

VMark acquired Unidata and renamed itself to Ardent Software. Ardent was
purchased by Informix and Informix was purchased by IBM.

IBM now sell and support UniVerse.

Now on another point. You say your boss may not want to spend good money
keeping old data alive. Well it seems to me that if this old data is
still useful and necessary then it must surely be considered current and
active data. The fact that it resided in an old application is besides
the point.

I suggest purchasing the minimum UniVerse licences possible as this data
probably only needs one or two uses accessing it at any point in time
and this would keep the cost to a minimum.

Hope this suggestion is useful.

Cheers

Trevor Ockenden
Open Systems Professionals
Sydney Australia
m: 0414 731 634
e:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wong, Howard
Sent: Wednesday, 16 March 2005 1:46 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject:

To all,

I posted to the Chatter forum but was advise that the mail list would
have
wider audience for my question. My original post. In a nutshell, we know
nothing about UniVerse, but need to keep the data and move them to a
newer
server, Unix or otherwise.

Our plan is to convert the data into a mainstream DBMS, e.g. SQL Server,
DB2, etc. But further research after my original post indicates that it
will
be very involved. Since we don't know how the data is organised in the
DB,
we have to assume for the worst case. I'm afraid multivalues and
subvalues
will trip us up. Updating to a new version of UniVerse is probably going
to
solve the problem, but I doubt the manager would have the appetite to
spend
good money just to be able to read the very old data.

Please read the original post for details,. Again, any help is much
appreciated.

Sincerely,
Howard Wong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~~~
Original Post:
~~~
We have a very old Unix server that has to be decommissioned. On it is
an
application that has long since been migrated to a newer app and UNIX
platform. This old app is kept around for reference, and is not being
actively updated.

We have to replace the old Unix box, so the old app has to migrate too.
Trouble is the app uses a database called VMark, which no one around
here
knows anything about.

I did some research on the Net and it seems that VMark was a company
name,
and its database product was UniVerse. Further searches brought me to
this
site.

Am I on the right track? Can someone tell me if:
1) My understanding of VMark (a vendor) and UniVerse (the DBMS) correct?
2) If (1) is good, then is the IBM UniVerse DB the successor of the
VMark
UniVerse DB?
3) If (2) is correct, then is there any tool or utilities that can
either
(a) extract the structure and content of the database and perhaps
migrate
them to another DBMS (Unix or Windows), or (b) let us understand the
structure and content of the DB?

Any help is much appreciated. Please feel free to email me.

Sincerely,
Howard
~~~
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005


__
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
Newsletters for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com

--
No virus found in this outgoing messag

RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

[Adrian Matthews]

It's the BASIC process itself that hangs if the end-of-file marker is
incorrect. IF you kill those off it will release the session.

We used to get it all the time when we first switched to using non-U2
editors.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2005 18:12
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

It is possible .. I use TextPad and have for years .. but this is a new
client .. who knows.

I have noticed that since this problem started ...

if I don't leave a blank at the end of equates the compiler will simply
stop at the include.  It just locks up the session and there is no way
to kill the process/user/port.  I now have 7 sessions (6 hung) from
this mornings tracking .. 

I have never seen anything like this.

DSig
David Tod Sigafoos
SigsSolutions, Inc.


>  Original Message 
> Subject: RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler
> From: "Brian Leach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, March 14, 2005 9:09 am
> To: 
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Just a thought - what are you using to edit the INCLUDE source? It is
> possible that the last line of the file does not end in a CRLF or LF
> (depending on the OS). I've seen that cause similar problems. 
> 
> If that is the case, go into each include in ED and FILE it.
> 
> Brian 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 14 March 2005 16:25
> > To: U2 Users List
> > Subject: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler
> > 
> > Okay .. this one has got me ..
> > 
> > The program below will not compile.  It compiler responds with ..
> > 
> > *--
> > 01 basic DAVES.BP DEMO.MV 
> >   
> >
> > Compiling: Source = 'DAVES.BP/DEMO.MV', Object = 
> > 'DAVES.BP.O/DEMO.MV'   
> >
> > **
> > **?
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

[Adrian Matthews]

Does sound like the equates have an invalid end-of-file in one of them
then.

I expect someone edited one on Friday outside of UV.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2005 18:09
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

it appears to be true that moving the equates (cut/past) into the
program .. things work.  I have just modified 4 routines and all is
well.

This started last friday and spent most all the day chasing this down.

DSig
David Tod Sigafoos
SigsSolutions, Inc.


>  Original Message 
> Subject: RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler
> From: "Kevin King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, March 14, 2005 9:03 am
> To: 
> 
> Forget my previous idea.  Are you saying that if you bring in the
> lines from the includes into the main program (and comment out the
> $include lines) that it works?
> 
> -Kevin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.PrecisOnline.com
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:25 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler
> 
> Okay .. this one has got me ..
> 
> The program below will not compile.  It compiler responds with ..
> 
> *--
> 01 basic DAVES.BP DEMO.MV
> 
>
> Compiling: Source = 'DAVES.BP/DEMO.MV', Object = 'DAVES.BP.O/DEMO.MV'
> 
>
> **
> **?
>   
> 49if not(assigned(odbcName)) then odbcName = ''
> 
>
>  ^
> 
>
> End of Line unexpected, Was expecting: '!', '=', "AND", "OR", "LT",
> "LE",   
> "GT", "GE", "NE", "EQ", "MATCH", "ELSE"
> 
>
>  
> 
>
> 1 Errors detected, No Object Code Produced. 
> *--
> 
> In the program you will see 2 equates .. 
> 
> $INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_ERRORS_EQUATES.MV
> $include DAVES.BP SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE.MV
> 
> If these two equates are commented out and their associated lines
> (immediently below them) are uncommented .. it works.  Note that the
> ODBC.H include works.  Also the SQL_COMMON_INCLUDE is ok (simple label
> common  common /sql_common/
> comBaseEnv,comConnEnv,comSqlEnv,comErrorCheckEnv)
> 
> Once again .. if either of these two equates are 'included' the
> program
> fails compile.
> 
> I really cant see what could be causing this.  The 'equ' below the
> includes are cut and paste of the include files
> 
> Anyone see what could be going on here?
> 
> **
> *
> function SQL_INITENV(odbcName, odbcUser, odbcPass)
> *
> $INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_COMMON_INCLUDE
> 
> EQU TRUE$ to 1
> EQU FALSE$ to 0
> EQU NULL$ to ''
> 
> * UNIVERSES INCLUDE FOR DEALING WITH ODBC
> $INCLUDE UNIVERSE.INCLUDE ODBC.H
> 
> * LOCAL INCLUDES .. 
> $INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_ERRORS_EQUATES.MV
> **
> **Errors returned from the function (sql_write, sql_Read etc)
> will
> return
> **with MV list of errors.  mv1 will contain one of these codes
> **
> **NOTE: return will be NULL if ok .. else .. 
> **
> *EQU CONNECTION_ERROR$ TO -99
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_BIND_PARAMETERS$ TO -98
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_BIND_COLUMNS$ TO -97
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_PREPARE$ TO -96
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_READ$ TO -95
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_WRITE$ TO -94
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_FETCH$ TO -93
> *EQU UNABLE_TO_FREE_ENV$ TO -92
> *EQU INVALID_PARAMETER_PASSED$ TO -91
> *EQU CRITICAL_ERROR_CHECK$ TO -90
> 
> 
> $include DAVES.BP SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE.MV
> **
> **abstract:   Simply holds the default login connection through
> **odbc.
> **
> **author: dsig (David Tod Sigafoos)
> **date:   03mar05
> **
> **
> *DEFAULTODBCNAME$ = 'FOOBAR'
> *DEFAULTODBCUSER$ = 'FOOBAR'
> *DEFAULTODBCPASS$ = 'FOOBAR'
> 
> 
> * make sure it is assigned something ..
> if not(assigned(odbcName)) then odbcName = NULL$
> if not(assigned(odbcUser)) then odbcUser = NULL$
> if not(assigned(odbcPass)) then odbcPass = NULL$
> 
> * set to default if necessary (see
> SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE)
> if odbcName = NULL$ then odbcName = DEFAULTODBCNAME$
> if odbcUser = NULL$ then odbcUser = DEFAULTODBCUSER$
> if odbcPass = NULL$ then odbcPass = DEFAULTODBCPASS$
> 
> 
> initErrors = NULL$
> *
> *
> return (initErrors)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DSig
> David Tod Sigafoos
> SigsSolutions, Inc.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential 

RE: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

[Adrian Matthews]

Make sure that the record SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE.MV (or
whatever the last include in your program is) has a correct
end-of-marker.

Editing and putting a blank line on the end will do it.

Might not be your problem but I've had this several times in the past
and the description you give fits exactly.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2005 16:25
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Include Equate record Errors Compiler

Okay .. this one has got me ..

The program below will not compile.  It compiler responds with ..

*--
01 basic DAVES.BP DEMO.MV   
   
Compiling: Source = 'DAVES.BP/DEMO.MV', Object = 'DAVES.BP.O/DEMO.MV'  

?
  
49if not(assigned(odbcName)) then odbcName = ''
 ^  
   
End of Line unexpected, Was expecting: '!', '=', "AND", "OR", "LT",
"LE",   
"GT", "GE", "NE", "EQ", "MATCH", "ELSE" 
   

   
1 Errors detected, No Object Code Produced. 
*--

In the program you will see 2 equates .. 

$INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_ERRORS_EQUATES.MV
$include DAVES.BP SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE.MV

If these two equates are commented out and their associated lines
(immediently below them) are uncommented .. it works.  Note that the
ODBC.H include works.  Also the SQL_COMMON_INCLUDE is ok (simple label
common  common /sql_common/
comBaseEnv,comConnEnv,comSqlEnv,comErrorCheckEnv)

Once again .. if either of these two equates are 'included' the program
fails compile.

I really cant see what could be causing this.  The 'equ' below the
includes are cut and paste of the include files

Anyone see what could be going on here?


***
function SQL_INITENV(odbcName, odbcUser, odbcPass)
*
$INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_COMMON_INCLUDE

EQU TRUE$ to 1
EQU FALSE$ to 0
EQU NULL$ to ''

*   UNIVERSES INCLUDE FOR DEALING WITH ODBC
$INCLUDE UNIVERSE.INCLUDE ODBC.H

*   LOCAL INCLUDES .. 
$INCLUDE DAVES.BP SQL_ERRORS_EQUATES.MV
**
**  Errors returned from the function (sql_write, sql_Read etc) will
return
**  with MV list of errors.  mv1 will contain one of these codes
**  
**  NOTE: return will be NULL if ok .. else .. 
**
*EQU CONNECTION_ERROR$ TO -99
*EQU UNABLE_TO_BIND_PARAMETERS$ TO -98
*EQU UNABLE_TO_BIND_COLUMNS$ TO -97
*EQU UNABLE_TO_PREPARE$ TO -96
*EQU UNABLE_TO_READ$ TO -95
*EQU UNABLE_TO_WRITE$ TO -94
*EQU UNABLE_TO_FETCH$ TO -93
*EQU UNABLE_TO_FREE_ENV$ TO -92
*EQU INVALID_PARAMETER_PASSED$ TO -91
*EQU CRITICAL_ERROR_CHECK$ TO -90


$include DAVES.BP SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE.MV
**
**abstract: Simply holds the default login connection through
**  odbc.
**
**author:   dsig (David Tod Sigafoos)
**date: 03mar05
**
**
*DEFAULTODBCNAME$ = 'FOOBAR'
*DEFAULTODBCUSER$ = 'FOOBAR'
*DEFAULTODBCPASS$ = 'FOOBAR'


*   make sure it is assigned something ..
if not(assigned(odbcName)) then odbcName = NULL$
if not(assigned(odbcUser)) then odbcUser = NULL$
if not(assigned(odbcPass)) then odbcPass = NULL$

*   set to default if necessary (see
SQL_DEFAULT_CONNECTION_INFO_INCLUDE)
if odbcName = NULL$ then odbcName = DEFAULTODBCNAME$
if odbcUser = NULL$ then odbcUser = DEFAULTODBCUSER$
if odbcPass = NULL$ then odbcPass = DEFAULTODBCPASS$


initErrors = NULL$
*
*
return (initErrors)










DSig
David Tod Sigafoos
SigsSolutions, Inc.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

[Adrian Matthews]

I think this must be something to do with why proper triggers impose
such a load on a universe system. It has to check for deletes using some
internal mechanism.

Mind you the replication in Universe imposes very little load and that
track deletes as well

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 11 March 2005 22:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

I should think a little longer before pressing send... It's not that
easy to catch a delete using this kind of trigger. You can test for a
new record by trying to read it, if it's not there then this is a new
update. But since the trigger is called only once for a delete, it gets
pretty ugly to trap for this condition. The best answer I can come up
with on a Friday afternoon is treat every first pass as a delete, then
un-do whatever you did to track the delete on the second pass (if there
is one). That is a particularly heinous solution, however. There must be
a better way to do this.

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:28 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?


How do you track a record being deleted from the file though?

The real trigger mechanism fires with INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.

If memory serves this type of pseudo-trigger can't differentiate between
a delete and an insert/update.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 11 March 2005 20:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

Here is link that might be helpful: (works for both UV & UD)

http://www.mindspring.com/~tpackert/unidata_tricks.htm

I have used the index-trigger method to track and record all changes to
a file. It seems to work well; the performance hit has been negligible.
If anyone is interested I will post the code. The only gotcha was
figuring out how many times the TRIGGER subroutine was called, and what
my RECord variable contained each time. Here is the note at the top of
the subroutine regarding this:

SUBROUTINE SAVE.CHANGES.MYFILE(ANS,REC,ID)
* This subroutine is called from the 'TRIGGER' I-Type in dict MYFILE.
* A secondary index on MYFILE is defined on 'TRIGGER' using the NO.NULLS
option.
* That forces this subroutine to be called twice when a MYFILE record is
updated:
*  the first time with REC = the original record, then again with REC =
the new
*  record (however, if the MYFILE record is new, this subroutine is
called only once).

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Fitzgerald
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:15 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Triggers docs?


The manual is a bit skimpy on triggers. Any supplemetal docs around?

We're trying to track updates to a file; individual items have gone
missing 
lately. No SQL involvement at all.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then
delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that
do not relate to the official business of this company shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and
IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regula

RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

[Adrian Matthews]

Must be a Unidata thing. It only gets called once on Universe.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 11 March 2005 22:29
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

The trigger is normally called twice: the first time you get the
original @RECORD, the second time the new @RECORD. If an item is new or
being deleted, then the trigger is called only once. I use named common
to track of where I am and to save old @RECORD, so that I can test: if
this is not a new item, and old @RECORD is null, then this must be a
delete.

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:28 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?


How do you track a record being deleted from the file though?

The real trigger mechanism fires with INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.

If memory serves this type of pseudo-trigger can't differentiate between
a delete and an insert/update.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 11 March 2005 20:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

Here is link that might be helpful: (works for both UV & UD)

http://www.mindspring.com/~tpackert/unidata_tricks.htm

I have used the index-trigger method to track and record all changes to
a file. It seems to work well; the performance hit has been negligible.
If anyone is interested I will post the code. The only gotcha was
figuring out how many times the TRIGGER subroutine was called, and what
my RECord variable contained each time. Here is the note at the top of
the subroutine regarding this:

SUBROUTINE SAVE.CHANGES.MYFILE(ANS,REC,ID)
* This subroutine is called from the 'TRIGGER' I-Type in dict MYFILE.
* A secondary index on MYFILE is defined on 'TRIGGER' using the NO.NULLS
option.
* That forces this subroutine to be called twice when a MYFILE record is
updated:
*  the first time with REC = the original record, then again with REC =
the new
*  record (however, if the MYFILE record is new, this subroutine is
called only once).

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Fitzgerald
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:15 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Triggers docs?


The manual is a bit skimpy on triggers. Any supplemetal docs around?

We're trying to track updates to a file; individual items have gone
missing 
lately. No SQL involvement at all.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then
delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that
do not relate to the official business of this company shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and
IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Web Services for Dummies

[Adrian Matthews]

This one has come up again and again over the last few weeks. You'll
find lots of posting about it on www.indexinfocus.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cooper, Rudy
Sent: 11 March 2005 21:00
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Web Services for Dummies

Has anyone developed a web service for Universe ?

I'm trying to gather as much info as I can about the technology used.  I
realize UV 10.1 has many of the tools that I'll need for the backend,
but what is normally used on the frontend, what communications protocal
is normally used ?

I've read alot of theory about how it should work, but I haven't come
across anything that gives me some concrete examples.

Can someone direct me to some information or maybe explain to me in
practical terms on how an xml request would come into UV then a response
sent back to the requestor from UV using xml.

If you've done web services using ASP.NET and UV I would appreciate
hearing from you.

thx.

rudy

Rudy Cooper

Sage Publications

I.T Development
Thousand Oaks, California

(805) 499-0721 #7724
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

[Adrian Matthews]

How do you track a record being deleted from the file though?

The real trigger mechanism fires with INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.

If memory serves this type of pseudo-trigger can't differentiate between
a delete and an insert/update.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 11 March 2005 20:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Triggers docs?

Here is link that might be helpful: (works for both UV & UD)

http://www.mindspring.com/~tpackert/unidata_tricks.htm

I have used the index-trigger method to track and record all changes to
a file. It seems to work well; the performance hit has been negligible.
If anyone is interested I will post the code. The only gotcha was
figuring out how many times the TRIGGER subroutine was called, and what
my RECord variable contained each time. Here is the note at the top of
the subroutine regarding this:

SUBROUTINE SAVE.CHANGES.MYFILE(ANS,REC,ID)
* This subroutine is called from the 'TRIGGER' I-Type in dict MYFILE.
* A secondary index on MYFILE is defined on 'TRIGGER' using the NO.NULLS
option.
* That forces this subroutine to be called twice when a MYFILE record is
updated:
*  the first time with REC = the original record, then again with REC =
the new
*  record (however, if the MYFILE record is new, this subroutine is
called only once).

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Fitzgerald
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:15 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Triggers docs?


The manual is a bit skimpy on triggers. Any supplemetal docs around?

We're trying to track updates to a file; individual items have gone
missing 
lately. No SQL involvement at all.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Indexing issue

[Adrian Matthews]

Try quoting it as "'A12'..." instead.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Egerton
Sent: 11 March 2005 20:08
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Indexing issue

From: "Dan Knutson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 2:23 PM
Subject: [U2] Indexing issue


> I have a file that has thousands of keys that start with an A. There
is
> an index on the key. When I try and do a search for any items that
start
> with say A12 and I type in A12... the search does not return what I
> expect and takes a long time because Unidata thinks it is doing a
> Alphanumeric search.
> Is there a way to get the results I expect?

If the primary key is indexed, that's pretty much a waste of time.
Indexing
PART of the primary key on the other hand would be useful.  You might
consider creating an I-Type dictionary item that's @ID[1,3], and then
indexing that field.  That would work rather quickly.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2][UV] COMMON question

[Adrian Matthews]

That would mean passing common across sessions. Something that I wish
was possible but unfortunately is not as far as I know.

Any routines that your phantom calls can see the common. But  if you
telnet in or start another phantom that can't see it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina
Sent: 04 March 2005 21:51
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2][UV] COMMON question

Hello All,



Question on COMMON.  Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine
can use the COMMON variables for that account.  I'm thinking I could
write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom
job.  I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use
the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area.  Is this
possible?  Thanks.



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)644-8707 x 314
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

[Adrian Matthews]

We run Wintegrate 5.2 which fully supports device licensing.

What I wanted to do was to run 5 sessions with wintegrate and 5 sessions
with uniobjects and only take 1 license.

IBM said that this will not work and they have no intention of making it
work. The problem is that you need to know the subkey that wintegrate is
using to pass over with the uniobjects call apparently.

Are you sure it's working on your setup? It looks like it does on ours
until you do a cross comparison of the user count against uvlictool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: 04 March 2005 20:45
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

That is a bug, IBM sold it on the basic that you can run 10 sessions on
any
combination of ODBC, OLE-DB, Telnet, UniObjects.

I have it working on Windows.

What version of Wintegrate are you running, if it is to early it may not
handle device licensing.  

Regards

David Jordan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2005 2:59 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then.

IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state
doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. 

We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10
connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the
UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo
Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV
then it works very well.

We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and
Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool.

This is in UV 10.1.4  and AIX 5

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence


Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not
sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe.

The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator
and uniobjects.

I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently
they don't.

Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to
use the device license pool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew
Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence

If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, 
wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need
40 
UniData device licenses.

Regards,  Ian Renfrew


- Original Message - 
From: "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence


> UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the
access 
> to
> the UniVerse database.  With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent
users 
> can
> access the database at a time.   If you have 40 telnet users and 20
VB6 
> user
> then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login
would 
> be
> denied access.   The solution might be just to purchase 10 more
universe
> licenses.
>
> Regards
>
> David Jordan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence
>
> We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50
user
> licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20
using
> a VB6.0 program to enter data.
>
> We are having problems where the session drops because users are not 
> logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we
still
> get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit 
> the maximum licences.
>
> I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only
in
> earlier versions.
>
> Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want
to
> increase this to 100 users.
>
> Has anyone resolved similar problems with this.
>
> Many thanks
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

[Adrian Matthews]

Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then.

IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state
doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. 

We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10
connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the
UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo
Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV
then it works very well.

We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and
Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool.

This is in UV 10.1.4  and AIX 5

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence


Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not
sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe.

The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator
and uniobjects.

I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently
they don't.

Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to
use the device license pool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew
Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence

If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, 
wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need
40 
UniData device licenses.

Regards,  Ian Renfrew


- Original Message - 
From: "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence


> UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the
access 
> to
> the UniVerse database.  With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent
users 
> can
> access the database at a time.   If you have 40 telnet users and 20
VB6 
> user
> then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login
would 
> be
> denied access.   The solution might be just to purchase 10 more
universe
> licenses.
>
> Regards
>
> David Jordan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence
>
> We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50
user
> licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20
using
> a VB6.0 program to enter data.
>
> We are having problems where the session drops because users are not 
> logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we
still
> get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit 
> the maximum licences.
>
> I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only
in
> earlier versions.
>
> Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want
to
> increase this to 100 users.
>
> Has anyone resolved similar problems with this.
>
> Many thanks
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then
delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that
do not relate to the official business of this company shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and
IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only,

RE: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?

[Adrian Matthews]

Replication was incredibly slow before version 10 and had a large impact
on file updates. 

We have replication running between Windows and Linux versions in test
without problems. Due to limited downtime windows we are planning to
switch systems over two weekends with replication running in between.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: 04 March 2005 13:38
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?

Hola -

We've got a 9.5 system running on Irix that we're going to be upgrading 
to 10.1.4 running on Linux on new hardware, and it strikes me that 
replication might be a good way to minimize system downtime while we do 
the upgrade.

Any idea whether there would be any additional hitches in doing 
replication across platforms & versions? We would of course have fnuxied

and otherwise modified the files prior to the replication being set to 
go. Any thoughts (or alternative strategies to minimize system downtime 
during an upgrade) would be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

[Adrian Matthews]

Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not
sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe.

The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator
and uniobjects.

I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently
they don't.

Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to
use the device license pool.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew
Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence

If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, 
wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need
40 
UniData device licenses.

Regards,  Ian Renfrew


- Original Message - 
From: "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence


> UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the
access 
> to
> the UniVerse database.  With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent
users 
> can
> access the database at a time.   If you have 40 telnet users and 20
VB6 
> user
> then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login
would 
> be
> denied access.   The solution might be just to purchase 10 more
universe
> licenses.
>
> Regards
>
> David Jordan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence
>
> We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50
user
> licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20
using
> a VB6.0 program to enter data.
>
> We are having problems where the session drops because users are not
> logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we
still
> get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit
> the maximum licences.
>
> I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only
in
> earlier versions.
>
> Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want
to
> increase this to 100 users.
>
> Has anyone resolved similar problems with this.
>
> Many thanks
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe objects licence

[Adrian Matthews]

If the users were running multiple VB sessions then it might worth
looking at device (enterprise) licensing but as Universe doesn't allow
the pool of ten connections per license to be shared amongst processes
(ie telnet programs) it probably won't work for you.

At the end of the day if you're planning on running 100 users then you
should have a 100 user license. After all why should an objects license
be any cheaper as you have access to the full functionality of universe?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2005 11:47
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence

We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user
licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using
a VB6.0 program to enter data. 

We are having problems where the session drops because users are not
logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still
get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit
the maximum licences.

I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in
earlier versions. 

Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to
increase this to 100 users.

Has anyone resolved similar problems with this.

Many thanks 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] making 00001 our of 1

[Adrian Matthews]

Personally I find well spaced and structured code easier to read.
Consider the following:

BEGIN CASE
CASE V=5
TOTAL = AMT*RATE
CASE V=6
TOTAL = AMT*RATE2
CASE 1
ERR = 14
END CASE

Is much better as:

Begin Case

Case RateIndicator = 5
TotalAmt = Amount * MainRate

Case RateIndicator = 6
TotaAmt = Amount * SecondaryRate

Case ELSE
ErrorCode = INVALID_RATE_ERROR_CODE

End Case

Obviously ELSE and INVALID... are equates.

Humans can read mixed case a great deal easier than all uppercase and
the spacing helps the logic. Sensible variable naming negates the need
for comments.

All above IMHO and how long will this thread survive before going to
community!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: 03 March 2005 13:53
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] making 1 our of 1

IMHO I use the term 'overly grand' when i review existing prior code on
my
current and new clients and there is a very large verbose nature to it.
Not
being conclusive, but often times the code looks nice but there's way
too
much 'air' in the program at the expense of being better in the logic
area.

Certainly I've not read everyone's code. But what I've seen over the
years
has taught me that when I see grandness, that grandness takes a 200 line
program and makes it 700. Case in point:

***
*
* OPEN MD FILE
*
***
OPEN "","MD" TO F.MD ELSE
ERRMSG="CANNOT OPEN THE MD FILE. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR
PROGRAMMER"
GOSUB 9
STOP
END
*
*
* OPEN PRODUCT FILE
*
*
OPEN "","PRODUCT" TO F.PRODUCT ELSE
ERRMSG="CANNOT OPEN THE PRODUCT FILE. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR
PROGRAMMER"
GOSUB 9
STOP
END

*
* END OF OPENING FILES
*


What gets me is the time spent to make the asterisks match the length of
the
comments. I see your variable assignment style a lot yet if a new
variable
were needed, say

CUSTOMER.LAST.SALE.DATE = ""

would you re-indent all of the other variables just to look pretty? (I
don't
mean pretty in a derogatory way, I mean to spend your time and the
client's
$ for something that really doesn't matter)

I know that there are some system-generated source code 4GL's that may
create the comments for you. But I can see past that with the
inconsistent
content of the actual code.

There is a command which escapes me now that formats source code (not
necessarily databasic) in the editor to match old-school BAL
programming.
I've tripped over it by accident and then lose my changes as I EXit and
then
re-edit to not have all the 'air'.

Some could argue that a 200 line program becoming 700 could fall under
the
concept of standardized programming or making it easier for the next
guy.
Well, I'm that 'next guy' plenty of times and since it's very
inconsistent,
it's certainly not a standard. I could write a book on the wide variety
of
programming 'standards' I've inherited and the ineffeciencies found.

It's unfortunate that in my travels the grandness happens to have a
related
brother of reduced logic and a more brute force approach. It's just
harder
to research with all of that clutter.

My 2 cents.
Mark Johnson

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] making 1 our of 1


> Mark,
>
> I'm one of those programmers who use the "overly grand" way of spacing
you
> describe. I believe that
>
> ASDTFY = ''
> AS = ''
> DRT   = 0
>
> is much more readable than
>
> ASDTFY=''
> AS=''
> DRT=0
>
> especially when there is a lot more code than in this example, and
> everything else around it is crammed together as tightly as it can be
as
well.  Code is
> written for the human as much as the compiler, and I like it to be as
easy
> to read (and spot errors) as possible.
>
> This spacing won't bother a find program if you wrote it or have the
source,
> and teach it better.
>
> My 4 cents.
>
> Regards,
> Charlie Noah
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
writes:
>
> [snip]
> P.S. If you use my concept, you may want to have your search  strings
contain
> no spaces and convert to "" the spaces in each reviewed  line. There
is a
> overly grand way people program with spaces between  operators and
even
> though the complier doesn't care, FIND programs or the  editor will
miss
them
> if they don't match exactly.
>
> My 3  cents.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Barry Brevik" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
> > >I have always used "R%5" but I may miss programs
> >  >that use other techniques to arrive at the same result.
> > >Can  someone give me examples that they have seen for changing 1 to
1?
> >
> > I 

RE: [U2] [UV] Size Limit in a Dynamic Array

[Adrian Matthews]

Pretty sure the limit on any argument to a UniObjects call is 16k.

Been a while since I used it though so that limitation may have gone by
now.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo
Sent: 03 March 2005 10:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Size Limit in a Dynamic Array

Hi,

I wonder if anyone would know what the size limit of data that can be
handled within a dynamic array from within UniObjects.

We came across a limit whereby a customer had just over 14000 items in
an array that was being returned from UV.  The application threw an
error when it came back with the data and tried to assign it too a
variable in the application.

We use Universe 10.1.4, on AIX Ver 5.0 and using UniObjects ver 3.1

Any help much appreciated.  Thanks

Sunny Matharoo
Development Team Leader

Tristar Worldwide Chauffeur Services

Tel:+44 (0) 1895 432072
Fax:+44 (0) 1895 432098
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.tristarworldwide.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] unsubscribe

[Adrian Matthews]

Look at the bottom of the email!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stearns
Sent: 02 March 2005 19:08
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] unsubscribe

Sorry for addressing the whole list, I need the address to
send an unsubscribe request to. 

It should, perhaps, be a repeating message, maybe monthly? We
get the information when we subscribe, then years later when
we want to unsubscribe, searching our email archives (if we
have any that old) become a formidable task.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question

[Adrian Matthews]

What have you declared us1 as?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina
Sent: 01 March 2005 13:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question

Here is the code I am trying to use:

us1 = null   ;
us1.HostPort = 7200;
try
{
us1 =
UniObjects.OpenSession("Server","LoginName","Password","uvAccount","uvcs
");


It is compiling just fine, I am getting an error when I run it though.
Any suggestions?

Thanks,
 
Nick Cipollina
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question

(this won't compile and is not meant to)
Have a look in the UniObjects .Net pdf file for more info on this, but
here's how you can change the port number used for the connection.

public UniSession uSession;
uSession.HostPort = 12345;
uSession = UniObjects.OpenSession("Server", "LoginName", "PassWord",
"uvAccount", "uvcs");



On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:35:35 -0500, Nick Cipollina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How exactly can I do this?.  (I'm new to .NET).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nick Cipollina
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:29 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
> 
> Check the UniSession property "HostPort".  I believe that if you set
> it to match your host settings you should be OK.
> 
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our rpc port is set to 7200.  Is there something I need to change
> within
> > .NET to tell it to look for that port?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick Cipollina
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
> >
> > Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and
there
> > are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port.  On
an
> > HP-UX machine this is port 31438.  Have a look at the services file
in
> > /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere.
> >
> > uvrpc   31438/tcp   # uvNet rpc port
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask.  I am trying to write a
> simple
> > > UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am
> > > getting the following error:  "No connection could be made because
> the
> > > target machine actively refused it."  Any ideas what I am missing?
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Nick Cipollina
> > >
> > > Pick Programmer
> > >
> > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.
> > >
> > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210
> > >
> > > Richmond, VA 23294
> > >
> > > (804)644-8707 x 314
> > > ---
> > > u2-users mailing list
> > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UD] Replication

[Adrian Matthews]

We use it on Universe on Windows and it works very well. Sync can be very slow
though. I expect it's all different in UD though



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Wolverton
Sent: Mon 28/02/2005 15:40
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Replication



I had actually seen your email in a U2 log - it's what prompted me to write
the user group to see if things had changed...

And so far, I've heard no one say 'we ARE using Replication on Windows'...


David W.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 5:24 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Replication

Hi

We have been testing Unidata Replication for a number of months now and at
the moment are unable to recommend it to our users. One of the main reasons,
is that you can not be certain that the system is actually replicating.

You should note that "ud_repadmin -report" only reports from local shared
memory , it does NOT enquire of the remote servers status, so only reports
on the local systems replication status.
The only way to get a remote status is by doing a 'sync' and seeing if it
works.

Replication is obviously an important product for IBM and they have been
working with us to get reproducable cases. They are now looking at what can
be done to improve the system.

Regards
James Hogan
Sungard

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: 27 February 2005 23:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UD] Replcation


I'd like to find out those of you using the UniData replication features and
your experience. I'm on Windows, UD 6.0.12 on both sides of the Replication.

I've got a site that is driving me MAD - Replication suddenly halted running
two months ago after running for 4 months without issue.  I've stood on my
head trying to get things back and up and running...

I've got IBM assisting, but is there anything that anyone ran across along
the way that was a gotcha?  In my case, the Repmanager.exe will just die on
the publisher. Not every 'group' is coming up, and I am scratching my head
as to why.  IBM is sort of at the same place, as there appears not to be
anything 'obvious', other than I'm trying to replicate an account's worth of
files (hundreds), but it did (appear) to work for months before just
stopping. (It's an end-user site, so I don't think they have the skill or
desire to change anything -- at this point, I've changed just about
EVERYTHING trying to find why it's not running!)

Any thoughts would be good - and knowing if it's 'just me' -- if it is, then
I've got more incentive to keep digging on my side - however, if no one has
a production level install running, or have issues keeping it running, then
maybe I need more IBM assist!!  I read somewhere that there was an issue
'knowing' it was running - that was our case - I only know when it stopped
based on modification dates in Windows! The end user was blissfully
unaware

Thanks for any thoughts -
David W.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] MASTER OFF

[Adrian Matthews]

On our windows Universe system we used to have a phantom process  that
ran under with administrative rights. This used to check a file every 15
seconds for instructions to MASTER OFF a port. The users had a program
they could run that wrote the record to the file. That way they had the
ability to log off users without needing admin access.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Farrant
Sent: 23 February 2005 13:57
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] MASTER OFF 

Yes we're in the process of rolling out sudo to our IT staff and
removing root access but we have not been able to get MASTER OFF to
work.

I was always led to believe that MASTER OFF is a cleaner way to drop
Universe sessions rather than killing the sessions at unix level.

Mike Farrant
IT Manager, Premdor UK

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Lakeland
Sent: 23 February 2005 12:53
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] MASTER OFF 

Not sure about doing it from Universe as it's the unix permissions which
come into effect.

You could use the sudo utility and then allow them to kill the process
from Unix or a universe shell executing a unix command.

Sudo (superuser do) allows a system administrator to give certain users
(or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all) commands as root
while logging all commands and arguments. Sudo operates on a per-command
basis, it is not a replacement for the shell.

andy




-Original Message-
From: Mike Farrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2005 13:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] MASTER OFF 

Hi,
Can anyone tell me if there is a way to allow non root access users to
access the universe MASTER OFF command?

We are on version 9.6.1.6 of Universe.

Thanks

Mike Farrant
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Default Catalog?

[Adrian Matthews]

Perhaps it's set to load into shared memory at Uv startup? Although I
think that requires it to be in global catalog as well.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacques G.
Sent: 23 February 2005 06:28
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Default Catalog?

I've been working on a Universe 10.xx on an Dec Alpha
machine, I found an account where a subroutine was
being called and the routine wasn't catalogued in that
account.  It wasn't catalogued globally as well.

There seems to be some default at work where if the
subroutine isn't catalogued, it checks in the library
of the calling program ?  (Like the include statement
?).  

I've previously worked on versions 6.xx to 9.xx on a
HP-UX and I don't remember it doing this.  (But then,
most of the routines I used were usually in a
different library there)

Is this something new ?




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

Don;t forget that a lot of developers actually work for the end user!

Also, as I've pointed out before, U2 has a bigger share of the embedded market
than Oracle so not everyone thinks it's expensive or could it be that the
application is more important that whats its written in.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 16:12
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



I don't get your point ?

Who cares about Users opinions on PE, they should already have a fully
licensed installation.  I am just a poor lowly developer.

Also - don't forget to consider that as developer costs rise, so do the costs
of the products/services that they pass on to their customers. Especially when
the developer decides that the cost/benefit of developing for U2 is no longer
worth it and in order to use their latest and greatest killer app you are now
forced to follow the developer to a big boy's system and its associated costs.
The only thing that keeps U2 alive is the software that runs on it - when the
U2 software development & support industry base dries up, no more U2.  But
then again maybe that is the whole idea ?

Gerry




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 05:34 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


To license Oracle for our production hardware would cost GBP250,000 or FIVE
times what Universe costs us. And thats just for a database, I'd have to get
more licenses to actually develop an equivalent system.

I may have to pay for dev/test licenses on Universe whereas on Oracle I don't
but it would still cost at least three times more to use Oracle.




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 01:17
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



Hi,

Microsoft and Oracle both GIVE away, yes I said give away versions of their
database products, and they both interact easily with modern gui/web based
development environments, and you can search HUGE knowledge bases of
information about how to do something.

I know people in this group think U2 is the greatest, but that does not make
it necessary to lock it up like the crown jewels.

Questions:

Why can't end users access the knowledgebase?
Why isn't their developer versions of the U2 products, as it is the
developers you generate UV license sales, not IBM?

I can pay $900.00 NZD per year, and get a copy of MS Sql Server 2000, MS
Exchange, MS SBS, 10 CALS for MS Professional XP, 10 CALS for MS Office
2003, Sharepoint Portal, MS 2003 Server, MS 2003 Web Edition all to use for
demos or in house to run my business.

Some people may wonder why you would develop something in U2?

Cheers,

Phil Walker
+64 27 5336294
+64 3 3120352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gnosys Consulting Limited
25 Roscrea Place, Mandeville North, RD2 Kaiapoi, North Canterbury 8252, NEW
ZEALAND
DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose
or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that
you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting
Limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any
attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting Limited. We use virus
scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar
in this email or any attachment.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:20 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

I never thought I'd see grown people complaining that they hadn't gotten
their free stuff soon enough.

As in *free*

*No charge*

As in if you complain *TOO MUCH* maybe they'll start charging $100.00 for
it.PER YEAR.

You wanna know how much software I give away for free?  Ok, maybe one little
SUBR dict program using an index to retrieve data from a file with a
different id, but that was it!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kent
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 14:19
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe


What a joke Leroy

I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses through a
master var
This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers

Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this

jak
- Original Message -
From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


> They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half
> over.
>
> I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downl

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

For us we would have to use the Oracle enterprise licenses due to the number
of cpu's we use. A lot, lot more than $150 per cpu.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bill H.
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 16:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



Adrian:

I recently saw a Dell add where they partner with Oracle and one can
purchase an Oracle license for about $150/license.  Don't know how that
works out in a web environment or a "device licensing" scenario but that's
not anywhere near as expensive as it used to be.

Also, Microsoft SQL Server can be had for about $5,000 (or less) for an
unlimited license on a single processor.

Bill

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 2:26 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
>
> Yes but how much does it cost to license Oracle and Access for a Live
> environment?
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker
> Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 01:17
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Microsoft and Oracle both GIVE away, yes I said give away
> versions of their
> database products, and they both interact easily with modern gui/web based
> development environments, and you can search HUGE knowledge bases of
> information about how to do something.
>
> I know people in this group think U2 is the greatest, but that
> does not make
> it necessary to lock it up like the crown jewels.
>
> Questions:
>
> Why can't end users access the knowledgebase?
> Why isn't their developer versions of the U2 products, as it is the
> developers you generate UV license sales, not IBM?
>
> I can pay $900.00 NZD per year, and get a copy of MS Sql Server 2000, MS
> Exchange, MS SBS, 10 CALS for MS Professional XP, 10 CALS for MS Office
> 2003, Sharepoint Portal, MS 2003 Server, MS 2003 Web Edition all
> to use for
> demos or in house to run my business.
>
> Some people may wonder why you would develop something in U2?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil Walker
> +64 27 5336294
> +64 3 3120352
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gnosys Consulting Limited
> 25 Roscrea Place, Mandeville North, RD2 Kaiapoi, North Canterbury
> 8252, NEW
> ZEALAND
> DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose
> or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return
> e-mail that
> you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting
> Limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message
> and / or any
> attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting Limited. We use virus
> scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or
> anything similar
> in this email or any attachment.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:20 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
> I never thought I'd see grown people complaining that they hadn't gotten
> their free stuff soon enough.
>
> As in *free*
>
> *No charge*
>
> As in if you complain *TOO MUCH* maybe they'll start charging $100.00 for
> it.PER YEAR.
>
> You wanna know how much software I give away for free?  Ok, maybe
> one little
> SUBR dict program using an index to retrieve data from a file with a
> different id, but that was it!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kent
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 14:19
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe
>
>
> What a joke Leroy
>
> I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses
> through a
> master var
> This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers
>
> Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this
>
> jak
> - Original Message -
> From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
> Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe
>
>
> > They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is
> only half
> > over.
> >
> > I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
> > earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
> > couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest
> features we
> > have to experiment with, and

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

But in that environment (as an embedded database) U2 is already far bigger
than Oracle.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon Carter
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 11:35
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: 17 February 2005 10:26
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


Yes but how much does it cost to license Oracle and Access for a Live
environment?



Adrian,

Fair point, but by the time that *that* question needs to be raised in
seriousness, the user/developer/software house has had a dabble and
decided whether or not Oracle/Access is a viable technology for their
needs. Give away limited duration/limited user versions of U2, with full
GUI admin and a GUI only version of SB+, and I wonder how many people
would be converted/influenced? Perhaps not that many, but more, I'd
guess, that those likely to be impressed by a command line environment,
databasic and proc.

My 2d worth.

Simon
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

To license Oracle for our production hardware would cost GBP250,000 or FIVE
times what Universe costs us. And thats just for a database, I'd have to get
more licenses to actually develop an equivalent system.

I may have to pay for dev/test licenses on Universe whereas on Oracle I don't
but it would still cost at least three times more to use Oracle.




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 01:17
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



Hi,

Microsoft and Oracle both GIVE away, yes I said give away versions of their
database products, and they both interact easily with modern gui/web based
development environments, and you can search HUGE knowledge bases of
information about how to do something.

I know people in this group think U2 is the greatest, but that does not make
it necessary to lock it up like the crown jewels.

Questions:

Why can't end users access the knowledgebase?
Why isn't their developer versions of the U2 products, as it is the
developers you generate UV license sales, not IBM?

I can pay $900.00 NZD per year, and get a copy of MS Sql Server 2000, MS
Exchange, MS SBS, 10 CALS for MS Professional XP, 10 CALS for MS Office
2003, Sharepoint Portal, MS 2003 Server, MS 2003 Web Edition all to use for
demos or in house to run my business.

Some people may wonder why you would develop something in U2?

Cheers,

Phil Walker
+64 27 5336294
+64 3 3120352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gnosys Consulting Limited
25 Roscrea Place, Mandeville North, RD2 Kaiapoi, North Canterbury 8252, NEW
ZEALAND
DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose
or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that
you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting
Limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any
attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting Limited. We use virus
scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar
in this email or any attachment.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:20 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

I never thought I'd see grown people complaining that they hadn't gotten
their free stuff soon enough.

As in *free*

*No charge*

As in if you complain *TOO MUCH* maybe they'll start charging $100.00 for
it.PER YEAR.

You wanna know how much software I give away for free?  Ok, maybe one little
SUBR dict program using an index to retrieve data from a file with a
different id, but that was it!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kent
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 14:19
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe


What a joke Leroy

I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses through a
master var
This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers

Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this

jak
- Original Message -
From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


> They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half
> over.
>
> I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
> earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
> couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features we
> have to experiment with, and you'll have them with just a little patience.
> Because they are free evaluation copies, we are required to package them a
> bit differently, and the U2 group was not the only group involved in the
> process. We, too, had to wait.
>
> They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the
> time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
> arrival as soon as they are ready.
>
> Thanks again for waiting.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
> Product Manager
> IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
> IBM Information Management Software
> Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
> Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
> External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
>
>
>
> "Marc Harbeson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .com>  To
> Sent by:  ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> stserver.u2ug.org  cc
>
>   Subject
> 02/15/2005 09:28  RE: [U2] uv pe
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>er.u2ug.org
>
>
>
>

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

Yes but how much does it cost to license Oracle and Access for a Live
environment?





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 01:17
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe



Hi,

Microsoft and Oracle both GIVE away, yes I said give away versions of their
database products, and they both interact easily with modern gui/web based
development environments, and you can search HUGE knowledge bases of
information about how to do something.

I know people in this group think U2 is the greatest, but that does not make
it necessary to lock it up like the crown jewels.

Questions:

Why can't end users access the knowledgebase?
Why isn't their developer versions of the U2 products, as it is the
developers you generate UV license sales, not IBM?

I can pay $900.00 NZD per year, and get a copy of MS Sql Server 2000, MS
Exchange, MS SBS, 10 CALS for MS Professional XP, 10 CALS for MS Office
2003, Sharepoint Portal, MS 2003 Server, MS 2003 Web Edition all to use for
demos or in house to run my business.

Some people may wonder why you would develop something in U2?

Cheers,

Phil Walker
+64 27 5336294
+64 3 3120352
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gnosys Consulting Limited
25 Roscrea Place, Mandeville North, RD2 Kaiapoi, North Canterbury 8252, NEW
ZEALAND
DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose
or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that
you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting
Limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any
attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting Limited. We use virus
scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar
in this email or any attachment.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:20 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

I never thought I'd see grown people complaining that they hadn't gotten
their free stuff soon enough.

As in *free*

*No charge*

As in if you complain *TOO MUCH* maybe they'll start charging $100.00 for
it.PER YEAR.

You wanna know how much software I give away for free?  Ok, maybe one little
SUBR dict program using an index to retrieve data from a file with a
different id, but that was it!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kent
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 14:19
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe


What a joke Leroy

I cant get access to Tech connect as we get our universe licenses through a
master var
This annoys us plus our client sites with inhouse programmers

Its hard to defend IBM when they treat you like this

jak
- Original Message -
From: "Leroy Dreyfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe


> They are coming. We haven't broken any promises. The quarter is only half
> over.
>
> I would have thought a fair number of you folks would have downloaded
> earlier versions by now as they were on the U2TechConnect Website for a
> couple of years. We know you all want the latest and greatest features we
> have to experiment with, and you'll have them with just a little patience.
> Because they are free evaluation copies, we are required to package them a
> bit differently, and the U2 group was not the only group involved in the
> process. We, too, had to wait.
>
> They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the
> time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
> arrival as soon as they are ready.
>
> Thanks again for waiting.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
> Product Manager
> IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases
> IBM Information Management Software
> Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
> Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
> External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW:  http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2
>
>
>
> "Marc Harbeson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .com>  To
> Sent by:  ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> stserver.u2ug.org  cc
>
>   Subject
> 02/15/2005 09:28  RE: [U2] uv pe
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>er.u2ug.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> :-)
>
> I was so mad.  I had just sent the email to IBM asking them where PE
> was just a few days ago and got put off again...  till march.
>
> This crap is beyond silly...   I can download all kinds of PE versions of
> Oracle 
>
> Have I lit a big 

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

But as IBM posted earlier you're not allowed to give that to anyone.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Lakeland
Sent: 16 February 2005 13:30
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

If someone needs a copy of PE,   I have version 10.01,  it's a 13mb
files.

andy

-Original Message-----
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 February 2005 11:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] uv pe

It might be an "Urban Myth" but what I heard was that it was very easy
to
remove the licensing/modulo restrictions on PE and give yourself a free
unlimited used version of Universe. Given the lengths that some people
seem
to
go to avoid paying license fees (hundreds of phantoms etc etc) I
wouldn't be
suprised and that would explain why they won't repost the older
versions.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Craig Bennett
Sent: Wed 16/02/2005 05:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe



Leroy,

 > They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret
the
 > time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
 > arrival as soon as they are ready.

would it be possible to leave the older versions up?
That way if someone quickly want to test something on an older U2
version than the current release, there might be a chance that they
could download it.

It would also mean there was always a version available to download even
if it wasn't the very latest :)


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not
the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others
this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to
this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and
any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the
official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed
by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by
the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian
Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
had a
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] uv pe

[Adrian Matthews]

It might be an "Urban Myth" but what I heard was that it was very easy to
remove the licensing/modulo restrictions on PE and give yourself a free
unlimited used version of Universe. Given the lengths that some people seem to
go to avoid paying license fees (hundreds of phantoms etc etc) I wouldn't be
suprised and that would explain why they won't repost the older versions.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Craig Bennett
Sent: Wed 16/02/2005 05:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] uv pe



Leroy,

 > They are nearly ready to be placed on the Web again, and we do regret the
 > time it has taken to get this far. We will be sure to announce their
 > arrival as soon as they are ready.

would it be possible to leave the older versions up?
That way if someone quickly want to test something on an older U2
version than the current release, there might be a chance that they
could download it.

It would also mean there was always a version available to download even
if it wasn't the very latest :)


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Uv Error

[Adrian Matthews]

What are you using to do the backup?



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Cooper, Rudy
Sent: Tue 15/02/2005 21:31
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Uv Error



Hello,

Does anyone know what can cause the following error ?

1009: Program "S$WEB.CM.CREATE": Line 8, Error initializing AK file
"f:/sage/sagpub9/I_33/INDEX.003".
1010: No CM file.

We're on a W2K box running UV 10.0.1

We have jobs that run in the windows scheduler.Just recently we
started getting this error.  It seems to be the alternate key file for
our customer file.  This job runs at 3:45am.  Our system is void of
users at that time.  What's odd is that this error can occur after
mulitple reads and writes to the file, then all of a sudden the file
gets locked or renamed to something else.

We have a backup that completes about 1 hour before this job starts.
Antivirus runs when the jobs are not scheduled to run.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

thx,

rudy

Rudy Cooper

Sage Publications

I.T Development
Thousand Oaks, California

(805) 499-0721 #7724
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] &PH& Phantom process IDs

[Adrian Matthews]

Yeh, we get loads of those when we restart. Seems a strange way of
making the record ID's unique and is worrying when you first see it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 February 2005 07:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] &PH& Phantom process IDs

Just wondering if anyone else has come across weird &PH& entries when
they
start multiple phantoms off?



After the normal: RUN_61985_13557

the following entries are like: SVO`72:86_13557

RUN`72:85_13557

RUO`72:85_13557

RVO`72:85_13557

etc



I can see that the phantom process is incrementing the id parts but
without
a standard separator (_) it seems more difficult to successfully purge
the
file by date than it needs to be.



--

Regards,

Stuart Boydell















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support
Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10

[Adrian Matthews]

Yes but if everything else is equal then clock speed does play a part.

Love to use an Opteron but they're not supported so a non-starter.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
Sent: 11 February 2005 18:17
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
Solaris 10

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian
Matthews
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:59 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
> Solaris 10
>
>
> We've been through a very similar exercise recently (as you've
probably
> guessed) and we came down to using IBMx445 servers with RHEL AS 3.
>
> As the clock speed of the SPARC is relatively low compared to a Xeon
MP
> we found that combination outperformed the Sun (and was a lot cheaper
> once a large disk array was added in). There was nothing that Sun
could
> do to improve the performance due to Universe being compiled against a
> very old solaris (7) version.

 Core clock speed, alone, is an irrelevant factor in the overall
performance. It typically only makes a difference based on chip
architecture, bus speed, memory access, and chipset performance. The Sun
box is a RISC platform, right? I'd be interested in your
comparison specs, if you can dig 'em up. I'd bet a few bucks that a dual
Opteron(2.0Ghz-2.4Ghz) would smoke a Dual Xeon-MP of any
current speed. I've never put them side by side with exactly the same
peripheral hardware. A Xeon is basically just a Pentium on
steroids. Have you looked at the Opteron whitepaper and architecture
specs? The potential bandwidth those things have, as n-way
configs, is totally awesome. I'm sure even a single 100 series, on a
dual-board, will smoke a single Xeon. Check out the 800
series - if you've got a bottomless wallet, you can run an 8-way
Opteron. *drool*

>
> You can probably imagine what the Sun engineers reaction to that was!
He
> wasn't very complimentary about IBM.
>
> Interestingly Solaris 10 is supposed to be able to run any Linux
> application.
>

  Hrm.. I find that hard to believe. ANY Linux binary?

Glen
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10

[Adrian Matthews]

We've been through a very similar exercise recently (as you've probably
guessed) and we came down to using IBMx445 servers with RHEL AS 3.

As the clock speed of the SPARC is relatively low compared to a Xeon MP
we found that combination outperformed the Sun (and was a lot cheaper
once a large disk array was added in). There was nothing that Sun could
do to improve the performance due to Universe being compiled against a
very old solaris (7) version.

You can probably imagine what the Sun engineers reaction to that was! He
wasn't very complimentary about IBM.

Interestingly Solaris 10 is supposed to be able to run any Linux
application.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: 11 February 2005 12:34
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
Solaris 10

Right, the two would be separate, either we'd be running Linux on Xeons 
or Opterons, or we'd be running Solaris on Sparc, not Solaris on Opteron

or Intel.

I've got the Solaris 10 CDs down and will try to do an install on a 
SunBlade we have here, with any luck I can get a copy of the U2 Solaris 
binaries from IBM in relatively short order to test this out, at least 
in a proof of concept stage.

Adrian Matthews wrote:
> What I meant was it won't run as a supported platform. I spoke to IBM
> last week and they said they only support Solaris on a SPARC.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
> Sent: 10 February 2005 23:54
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
> Solaris 10
> 
>   It will as a 32-bit application. You can run a single Opteron on a
> dual-board and you still get the benefit of 64-bit hardware. I
> have Win2K Pro running on that setup right now serving huge files.
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian
> 
> Matthews
> 
>>Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:55 PM
>>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
>>Solaris 10
>>
>>
>>Yes (v490). Problem is that Universe is compiled against Solaris 7 so
>>you get absolutely no benefit of later versions.
>>
>>Also as far as I know Universe does not run on Opteron.
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
>>Sent: 10 February 2005 21:04
>>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>Subject: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris
>>10
>>
>>Hola all -
>>
>>We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and
> 
> are
> 
>>looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which,
>>truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have
> 
> our
> 
>>UniVerse 9.6 installation on.
>>
>>We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2
> 
> and
> 
>>we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on
> 
> x86
> 
>>  so far; the Sun guys came by today & pitched a very nice price for 4
>>way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for
> 
> the
> 
>>virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know
> 
> it's
> 
>>kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these
> 
> containers?
> 
>>I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not
>>have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will
>>take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the
> 
> SunBlade
> 
>>100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the
>>Solaris 10 betas.
>>
>>Thanks very much for any input.
>>
>>--
>>Peter Ivanick
>>Sr. Programmer/Analyst
>>School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
>>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
>>http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
>>---
>>u2-users mailing list
>>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>>
>>
>>The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and
> 
> for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise
> 
>>indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
> 
> copy, use or disclose to others this message or any
> 
>>attachment. Please also not

RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password

[Adrian Matthews]

That should only work if your users have administrator rights..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Gouws
Sent: 11 February 2005 05:25
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password

Thanks everybody.

It worked  ->   DOS /C "NET USER user_id new_password"

Louie

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 February 2005 03:19
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password

Try this from the UV command prompt. You may need to qualify the domain
if
you are using domain based security.



>DOS /C "NET USER user_id new_passwd [/domain]"



See C:\>NET HELP USER for all the other net user options





-Original Message-

I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru

Telnet).



Is it possible?




























































































































































































































































































































































































**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support
Centre
(61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10

[Adrian Matthews]

What I meant was it won't run as a supported platform. I spoke to IBM
last week and they said they only support Solaris on a SPARC.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
Sent: 10 February 2005 23:54
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
Solaris 10

  It will as a 32-bit application. You can run a single Opteron on a
dual-board and you still get the benefit of 64-bit hardware. I
have Win2K Pro running on that setup right now serving huge files.

Glen

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian
Matthews
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:55 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under
> Solaris 10
>
>
> Yes (v490). Problem is that Universe is compiled against Solaris 7 so
> you get absolutely no benefit of later versions.
>
> Also as far as I know Universe does not run on Opteron.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
> Sent: 10 February 2005 21:04
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris
> 10
>
> Hola all -
>
> We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and
are
> looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which,
> truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have
our
> UniVerse 9.6 installation on.
>
> We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2
and
> we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on
x86
>
>   so far; the Sun guys came by today & pitched a very nice price for 4
> way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for
the
> virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know
it's
> kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these
containers?
> I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not
> have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will
> take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the
SunBlade
> 100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the
> Solaris 10 betas.
>
> Thanks very much for any input.
>
> --
> Peter Ivanick
> Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
> http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>
> The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and
for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise
> indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose to others this message or any
> attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or
by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete
> the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do
not relate to the official business of this company
> shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets
Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and
> regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris 10

[Adrian Matthews]

Yes (v490). Problem is that Universe is compiled against Solaris 7 so
you get absolutely no benefit of later versions.

Also as far as I know Universe does not run on Opteron.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: 10 February 2005 21:04
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Has anyone played with/tested UniVerse 10+ under Solaris
10

Hola all -

We've suddenly had some resources freed up from another project and are 
looking to rapidly replace the 12-14 year old SGI Challenge Ls (which, 
truly, are still performing magnificently in most respects) we have our 
UniVerse 9.6 installation on.

We've so far primarily tested on U2 10.1.x running on redHat AS 3.2 and 
we're starting to get quotes for hardware, and we've concentrated on x86

  so far; the Sun guys came by today & pitched a very nice price for 4 
way Opteron based 40Zs, but they also made a fairly strong case for the 
virtualization/compartmentalization features of Solaris 10. I know it's 
kind of early yet, but has anyone tried running U2 in these containers? 
I'm fascinated by the idea (as we could dual-purpose the box and not 
have to worry so much about our high-availability needs), but it will 
take a while before I can actually get to trying it out on the SunBlade 
100 here, so I'm interested if anyone's tried this, perhaps from the 
Solaris 10 betas.

Thanks very much for any input.

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password

[Adrian Matthews]

When the passwords on our domain expire the next time the user logs in
they have to use the new password.

Are you letting your users stayed logged-on for days? Universe won't
look at the password again until it needs it to access a resource or
start a session.

We autologout our users after 59 minutes.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Gouws
Sent: 10 February 2005 12:59
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Windows 2003 password

Hi All,

Universe 10.0.4
Windows 2003 Server

I want to change the Windows 2003 password via my UV application (thru
Telnet). 

The application is totally dependant on the Windows user + password for
security, and I want the users to change their own passwords say every
30
days.

Is it possible?

Note: If the Windows 2003 password setup says every 30 days you must
change
our password - you can work for longer thru UV + telnet, without Windows
2003 forcing you to change your password. Is this a short-coming of UV ?

Louie
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

[Adrian Matthews]

How would you pass a socket handle to a new process though?

I can see ways of doing it by calling subroutines, but how for a
completely new process?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2005 00:35
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface

Glen,

I have'nt done extensive research on it, but from the samples provided
by
IBM  using a dimensioned array, I believe UV would manage the forking
off
the sockets itself. Don't quote me on this though. I'll dig out the
sample I
have and send it on to ya...  If you want you can test it out on my
system
and play since you don't have access to a UV box.
For you no problem.

Vance

- Original Message - 
From: "Glen B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface


> Kevin,
>
>  I read through the PDF. However, it is not clear on how the handles
can
be used. A lot of the API's I've seen have the same level
> of functionality, but they all lack the ability to pass handles from
the
acceptor process to a totally separate user process. This
> isn't really an issue of the API, it's more of a user environment
issue.
You can pass the handle value itself, but the other process
> loses the 'meaning' of the handle and it just becomes a worthless
string.
An example would be launching a new phantom and passing it
> the handle variable, after accepting an incoming connection. The same
situation occurs when you pass any kind of memory reference(or
> offset) to anything outside the current user heap. Unix fork()ing
generates a mapped/duplicate user heap, so all file/handle
> references still work properly without having to munge underlying
memory
addresses. If you can truly pass a UV socket handle to
> another UV process, then there's no reason why anyone can't write a
stable
"multi-threaded" socket server directly in UV BASIC. Is
> this true? If so, I want a developer copy so I can try to blow it up.
:P

>
> -Glen
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin P
Lynch
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 3:52 PM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
> >
> >
> > you manage the connections from basic, the whole interface is a
> > set of basic extensions.  basically you open a socket on a port ,
> > accept a connection on that socket and write to the socket.
> >
> > here is the appropriate manual :
> > http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 2:31 PM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
> >
> >   Must be nice. I wish that capacity existed in every flavor. It
would
make
> > the integration world a breeze. Well my real question would be; is
the
> > service external or internal? I'd be interested in knowing how the
socket
> > service is laid out. Do you have to manage connections yourself? How
are
> > socket handles passed to children under multiple listening
conditions?
Or,
> > do you tell the UV service to listen 4-at-a-time, on port , and
then
> > call  when a connection is accepted?
> >
> > -Glen
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin P
Lynch
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 1:19 PM
> > > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > > Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
> > >
> > >
> > > Glen,
> > > The UV socket server interface works the same in Unix and Windows,
I
> > > have server programs running in both environments with no changes.
> > >
> > > Kevin Lynch
> > > The Systems House
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:04 PM
> > > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > > Subject: RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface
> > >
> > >  Stewart,
> > >
> > >  Socket implementations don't work across flavors. I've written
many
> > > socket apps for D3, but even the small differences in the socket
> > > designs between Win and *nix causes problems. Sockets are easy to
> > > implement, but only if you want to maintain separate code-sets for
Win
> > > and *nix under each flavor you want to support. I won't get into
the
> > > details here, since I'm not familiar with the UV socket API.
Service
> > sockets are meant for the O/S, not Pick.
> > > Doug Dumitru bit the bullet and wrote his own TCP stack in Pick
ASM.
> > > That is about the only way I would recommend even contemplating
Pick
> > > server sockets. For clients, the socket APIs are fine. The calls
are
> > > nearly identical between Win and *nix. The only issue there is
> > > blocking control, which unfortunately most of

RE: [U2] Universe to Web interface

[Adrian Matthews]

Works fine for me.

Are you sure you don't have anything in the LOGIN of the account that
might be kicking a non-telnet session out?

Try doing this.

C:\ibm\uv\bin\uvsh "LIST VOC" > output.txt

Output.txt should contain a listing of your VOC file.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2005 02:49
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface

Vance wrote: "
@REM Assuming this is a folder with a uv account
@cd \ibm\uv
@REM Execute the uv command
@c:\ibm\uv\bin\uvsh "LIST VOC"

I don't know what the "@" signs do, but when I try this
fromthe DOS command prompt window
c:\something\uvsh "LIST VOC"
it just kinda blinks and returns to the DOS Command Prompt window.
I don't see any kind of output.
I don't know why.  Where did my output go?
Thanks
Will
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] wIntegrate Editor question

[Adrian Matthews]

Try putting a blank line at the end. Sounds daft but we have the same
problem and that fixes it for us.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Plummer
Sent: 08 February 2005 17:22
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] wIntegrate Editor question

We recently switched out Unidata server from Tru64 Unix to Solaris.
Since the switch we have a peculiar thing happening when using the
wIntegrate Editor. It works normally if you are modifying a paragraph
that already exists but gives an error if you write a new paragraph and
try to upload it. I have checked Unix permissions and there is write
access to the file. Anyone seen this one before?



Tim Plummer, MBA

Director of Administrative Computing

Grand Canyon University
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Unidebugger

[Adrian Matthews]

And also make them work for replicated files as well

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington
Sent: 02 February 2005 13:47
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidebugger

"Susan Joslyn" wrote...
>
> You're right, triggers cannot be used on
> "directory type" files. We did ask IBM for that at the U2UG meeting in
Las
> Vegas last September.
>
> Their chief argument against them was that you can get to those
> "directory" files from outside U2 anyway.

I would imagine that that's more of a sales-and-marketing argument.
There's
also the engineering problem of directory files having no header block
to
store the trigger definition in.

> I hope that IBM is listening -- and if anyone agrees with me that
triggers
> are critical in today's IT, please put your two cents in.  (For all
file
> types, with an efficiency that makes them usable.)

But I agree wholeheartedly with this - consider my two cents added.

Simon.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Unidebugger

[Adrian Matthews]

We use EditPlus with SourceSafe which works well as no-one can change a
program from within Universe or without unless it's been checked out
first.

We developed an add-in (as have others) to make the links to SourceSafe
an integral part of EditPlus so checking status, checking in/out,
promoting to test/pre-prod/prod is all done via a menu/single keystroke.

Before we started using EditPlus we used the command line facilities of
SourceSafe to link into the Universe shell.

Of course, maintaining version control over dictionaries and property
records is a bit trickier as SourceSafe will only work for type 1/19.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn
Sent: 02 February 2005 03:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger

We're using the word 'locking' in two different ways, here.

Lock as in 'read lock' is indeed done by the unidebugger.

Locking as in -- calling a host subroutine to validate the available
status
in a source library system (such as PRC (hah! You knew I'd plug!) is
something that the Unieditor (with Wintegrate, but not Dynamic Connect)
can
do, but the Unidebugger (presently) cannot.

Everyone whine and beg and maybe they can put that in for us.  In the
meantime, Gordon, I would think that you could address it with file
triggers... any reason why you can't?

Susan


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J
Glorfield
Sent: 01 February 2005 14:00
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger

Now I'm confused.  You are now the second person to claim that the 
"UniDebugger doesn't use locking when it reads/writes host Basic 
programs".  This is definitely not the case here.  We use the UniObjects

connect method and it does use and honor record locks.

I was hoping that someone could suggest a method utilizing triggers or 
something to get it to honor our check-in/check-out database.  I'm not 
really interested in investigating alternatives to UniDebugger.  I just 
want to explore making it work.  Perhaps I need to look at the
read/write 
permissions, as hinted at earlier, as a possible solution.

Cheers,
Gordon


Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
301-360-8839

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/01/2005 07:40:55 AM:

> The UniDebugger doesn't use locking when it reads/writes host Basic 
> programs as this would not fit the home-grown check-in/out systems 
> many people use.
> 
> In the wIntegrate Editor we added the ability to call a custom 
> subroutine at the usual points which give 100% control, in the same 
> way as the "service subroutine" which is optionally called by the 
> Query Builder to filter what the users sees and does.
> 
> However today the UniDebugger does not support custom host
subroutines.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Unidebugger

[Adrian Matthews]

There are other ways of accessing with Unidebugger apart from
UniObjects.

FTP, shares etc. These methods do not respect Universe record locks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J
Glorfield
Sent: 01 February 2005 14:00
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger

Now I'm confused.  You are now the second person to claim that the 
"UniDebugger doesn't use locking when it reads/writes host Basic 
programs".  This is definitely not the case here.  We use the UniObjects

connect method and it does use and honor record locks.

I was hoping that someone could suggest a method utilizing triggers or 
something to get it to honor our check-in/check-out database.  I'm not 
really interested in investigating alternatives to UniDebugger.  I just 
want to explore making it work.  Perhaps I need to look at the
read/write 
permissions, as hinted at earlier, as a possible solution.

Cheers,
Gordon


Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
301-360-8839

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/01/2005 07:40:55 AM:

> The UniDebugger doesn't use locking when it reads/writes host Basic 
> programs as this would not fit the home-grown check-in/out systems 
> many people use.
> 
> In the wIntegrate Editor we added the ability to call a custom 
> subroutine at the usual points which give 100% control, in the same 
> way as the "service subroutine" which is optionally called by the 
> Query Builder to filter what the users sees and does.
> 
> However today the UniDebugger does not support custom host
subroutines.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon J Glorfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 31 January 2005 21:13
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Unidebugger
> 
> Speaking of the Unidebugger and Sarbaines/Oxley, we are having some 
> issues here with them.  Currently our green-screen editors are 
> front-ended by a subroutine that checks a database to make sure you 
> have the program "checked out".  If you don't have it checked out 
> the editors die with an error message alluding to a security
violation.
> 
> Unidebugger does not honor the "checked out" status of programs in 
> our library.  Is there a way to add this check to Unidebugger?
> 
> 
> Gordon J. Glorfield
> Sr. Applications Developer
> MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
> 301-360-8839
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 31/01/2005
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or 
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to

which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended 
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the

sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

[Adrian Matthews]

Or even adding it to the HELP PHANTOM output would be nice

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: 30 January 2005 19:23
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

Thanks, LeRoy, I _knew_ I'd seen it somewhere.

Pity this 10.0 improvement isn't mentioned in the 10.1 documentation.
Any chance of it being in the 10.1A docco, or will we have to wait for
11.x?
Or can it be at least mentioned in the 10.1 patch list / release notes
for the time being?


Regards


Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2005 17:41
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

>From the UV 10.0.19 patchlist file:

Issue  Short Description
-  -
3766 In order to run a phantom process as a different user, an
 enhancement has been made to the PHANTOM command. The
 syntax is as follows:

 PHANTOM [BRIEF] [SQUAWK] command -U username
[password]

 When you are logged in as root, you can specify -U and the
 username to run the phantom process as a different user. On
 Windows platforms, you must also specify the password for
the
 username.



Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Product Manager
IBM UniVerse and UniData (U2) Extended Relational Databases IBM DB2
Information Management Software
Tel: 303-672-1254  Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317   Tie-line: 770-1254
External email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence
Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy
or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Resize problems

[Adrian Matthews]

Don't try it on a large system though. It takes for ever to traverse all
the open handles and hogs a whole cpu while doing it.

Very useful for SMB though.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gyle Iverson
Sent: 28 January 2005 22:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Resize problems

Hello, Clif.

Try OH.exe from Microsoft at
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/existing/oh-o
.asp
. 

OH is great at answering the question, "Who or what has this file
open?".

Best regards,
Gyle
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Resize problems

[Adrian Matthews]

One of the many reasons why we're bucking recent trends and converting our UV
system from Windows to Unix...



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Fri 28/01/2005 19:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Resize problems



Comments embedded in the message below.


Jeff Fitzgerald wrote:
> The solution is to reboot the server, thus resetting the table of open
> files.  If there is a solution not requiring a reboot I am not aware of it.
> Since this seems to be an NT problem, bouncing uv doesn't seem to resolve
> it.

Isn't rebooting the standard solution to any Microsoft problem? :^)

>
> I suspect that the table becomes out of sync due to abnormal disconnects,
> etc.  However, I've not been able to purposely cause the problem nor can I
> usually trace the problem to any specific network problem, etc.

Just as a data point, I have this kind of thing happen to me on XP (UV
not even installed) all the time as a workstation. So I don't think it
requires a disconnect to occur. It just, well, happens.


--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniData Replication and File Resizing...

[Adrian Matthews]

The replication happens at a record level so I wouldn't have thought that
resizing the file would make any difference. You can, after all, replicate
between different file types.

We use Universe but I would think it would be pretty much the same on UD.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Wolverton
Sent: Thu 27/01/2005 20:34
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UniData Replication and File Resizing...



How does the subscribing machine act when you resize a published file?  Just
curious what we have to do, or if it is magically rezied on the subscriber
as well (Which is actually logical, but seems like it would have been a
lot of work for IBM to implement!!)

David WOlverton
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance and Universe

[Adrian Matthews]

Why such an old version of Universe or is it a typo?

At one of our audits we were picked up for being two versions behind
current let along 6+.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meeta Advani
Sent: 27 January 2005 15:08
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance and Universe

Hi all,

The company I work for, Mothers Work Inc., is a publicly held company,
traded on NASDAQ.  As a result, we are obliged to comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  I'm sure others of you are in the same position.
We run our business on a DG-UX machine with Universe 9.411.

The guidance we have been given is that we need to put stronger access
controls on programmers, track programmer actions, make sure that
sensitive commands at TCL such as DELETE, CLEAR-FILE, and
DELETE/FILE/etc. within ED are locked down to a certain extent.

Although we normally do all of our programming in-house, in this case we
are interested in finding out if there is already a product out there
(or code that is used internally at some other company) that
accomplishes this, and works as a wraparound.

If anyone has insight on this or other comments about SOX and the MV
world, I'd like to hear how you are dealing with this situation.

Thanks,
Meeta Advani

===
Meeta Advani
Programmer/Analyst
Mothers Work, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

[Adrian Matthews]

I can't seem to find it now but I'm sure I read in the release notes for
one of the new releases that a user name can be specified at the command
line when launching a phantom now.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy
(Logitek Systems)
Sent: 25 January 2005 02:20
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Run phantom as another user

Is there a way to run a phantom process as another user using the
PHANTOM command?
 
We have a situation where we have a background phantom process
periodically monitoring a directory on another server.  But, when the
user that launched the phantom processor changes their password, the
file open fails (due to expired credentials).   We would like to have
the phantom process 'run as' another user account that has the minimum
access it needs where the password does not ever expire and create the
failed open file problem.

We are simply opening the file as a "F" voc pointer with line 2
"\\server\sharename\directory".  The universe config parameter ALLOWNFS
is set to 1.
 
Thanks!
 
-Troy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

[Adrian Matthews]

Use the "-notags" option.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: 24 January 2005 20:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

Thanks to all who have responded. Although I am not hearing what I
wanted at
least I know why it's not working.

My next question then becomes: how can I use uvbackup to backup the
files I
need without marking each record as backed up? I have some files that a
couple of million records and don't want to wait through the time it
takes
to mark each record as backed up. Is there an option that will just do
the
backup without setting the flag?

Thanks again,

Jay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P Lynch
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 9:37 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

Jay,
try using uvbackup and uvrestore to move the files, it handles the
conversions itself, it usually works like a charm.
if they are on very different universe releases you may need to back
them up
using the
release options (check the doc on the release options for uvbackup, it's
fairly clear)

Kevin Lynch

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 6:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

I need to move some regular Universe files from a Unix platform (HPUX)
to
Windows. These files have triggers and fnuxi by itself will not work.
I've
tried FORMAT.CONV -export on the HPUX box but it indicates the file is
not a
SQL table. If I just ftp the file to my Windows platform and try fnuxi
-convert it reports the file already exists.



I have tried following the instructions in migrating from one schema to
another but it doesn't appear to work for regular Universe files. Can
anyone
shed some light on how I can get these files moved over without creating
new
files and copying the data into them and then copying?



Thanks in advance,



Jay



Jay Falck, CISSP, CHSS
MHC Specialist
Verilet, Inc
858-617-6324
512-301-2583
512-563-4132 (cell)

THIS MESSAGE, TOGETHER WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
USE OF
THOSE TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS
PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE
LAW.
IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, EMPLOYEE OR
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED
THAT
ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS
STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE
ORIGINAL SENDER IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS
MESSAGE,
ALONG WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS, FROM YOUR COMPUTER. THANK YOU.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

__
This email has been scanned by the Inbound TSH Mail Filter Please Report
any
issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

[Adrian Matthews]

You cannot move files with triggers between platforms that require a
fnuxi.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: 21 January 2005 23:53
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe 10 fnuxi problem

I need to move some regular Universe files from a Unix platform (HPUX)
to
Windows. These files have triggers and fnuxi by itself will not work.
I've
tried FORMAT.CONV -export on the HPUX box but it indicates the file is
not a
SQL table. If I just ftp the file to my Windows platform and try fnuxi
-convert it reports the file already exists.



I have tried following the instructions in migrating from one schema to
another but it doesn't appear to work for regular Universe files. Can
anyone
shed some light on how I can get these files moved over without creating
new
files and copying the data into them and then copying?



Thanks in advance,



Jay



Jay Falck, CISSP, CHSS
MHC Specialist
Verilet, Inc
858-617-6324
512-301-2583
512-563-4132 (cell)

THIS MESSAGE, TOGETHER WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
USE OF
THOSE TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS
PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE
LAW.
IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, EMPLOYEE OR
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED
THAT
ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS
STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE
ORIGINAL SENDER IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS
MESSAGE,
ALONG WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS, FROM YOUR COMPUTER. THANK YOU.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.

[Adrian Matthews]

That's the default setting and I'd say is far too low for most systems
(ours is currently 750).

As a first rough setting you need to work out how many files the average
session will have open and set MFILES to that (look at T30FILES as well
if you have dynamic files).

Search on www.indexinfocus.com to see previous postings regarding this.

 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carolina Lizama
Sent: 21 January 2005 12:03
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.

It's set to 12.

>From: "Adrian Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To: 
>Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.
>Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:55:43 -
>
>What is your MFILES set to? The last time this problem came up on the
>forum the general consensus was that the MFILES was set far too low.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carolina
Lizama
>Sent: 21 January 2005 10:07
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.
>
>I have the following error when running a Program on UV 9.6 / AIX 5.1
>
>Program "PRINT.CLI.DET": Line 322, Read operation failure. [EBADF] Bad
>file
>number
>A fatal error has occurred in UniVerse.
>Unable to re-open operating system file "&TEMP&/PRINT.CLI.DET"
>Error code 0
>
>On line line 322, I have the PAGE statement. The PAGE statement is
>inside
>the
>PRINTER ON and OFF, and instead of directly printing to a Printer, I am
>diverting the output to
>&TEMP& which is a Type 19 file.
>
>One page of data is printed and when it tries to print the next page,
>the
>above-mentioned error appears.
>
>I have tried RESIZING the file to 1, back to 19. Deleted the File
>completely
>and created a new file.
>But still no luck!
>
>Carol.
>
>_
>FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
>http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>
>
>The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and
for 
>the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not 
>the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others 
>this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying 
>to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the
email 
>and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate
to 
>the official business of this company shall be understood as neither
given 
>nor endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised
and 
>regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the

>Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.

[Adrian Matthews]

What is your MFILES set to? The last time this problem came up on the
forum the general consensus was that the MFILES was set far too low.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carolina Lizama
Sent: 21 January 2005 10:07
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Error with PAGE statement.

I have the following error when running a Program on UV 9.6 / AIX 5.1

Program "PRINT.CLI.DET": Line 322, Read operation failure. [EBADF] Bad
file 
number
A fatal error has occurred in UniVerse.
Unable to re-open operating system file "&TEMP&/PRINT.CLI.DET"
Error code 0

On line line 322, I have the PAGE statement. The PAGE statement is
inside 
the
PRINTER ON and OFF, and instead of directly printing to a Printer, I am 
diverting the output to
&TEMP& which is a Type 19 file.

One page of data is printed and when it tries to print the next page,
the 
above-mentioned error appears.

I have tried RESIZING the file to 1, back to 19. Deleted the File
completely 
and created a new file.
But still no luck!

Carol.

_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV: Select statement problem

[Adrian Matthews]

Are the DATE.FORMAT settings the same on both machines?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schalk van Zyl
Sent: 13 January 2005 07:13
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UV: Select statement problem

Any active Index? Indices up to date on both boxes?

Schalk van Zyl

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:45:13 -0500, Dianne Ackerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Is it possible that the UV accounts you're running on are different 
> flavors?  SELECTs in different flavors definitely work differently.
> -Dianne
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have come across a problem with select statements behaving
differently
>> between my two RISC boxes.
>>
>> I have two RS6000 machines : one for production and the other for
>> development.
>>
>> Both UV 10.0.14 and AIX 5.2
>>
>> While testing a program change on the development box, I came across
a
>> situation where a SELECT statement gave me different results when 
>> compared
>> to production.  To get around this, I had to break up the SELECT 
>> statement
>> into two parts.
>>
>> My question is: "Is there a setting somewhere that is not in synch 
>> between
>> production and development machines that could cause this. If so,
what?"
>>
>> Please accept the fact that the contents of the SELECT statement are 
>> good
>> (I'd rather not  explain the definitions of the dictionary items or
the
>> contents of the phrase "PHRASE"
>>
>>
>>
>> 0117:   STATEMENT = 'SELECT DB.PSES WITH SUB.ID = "':ACTUAL.ID:'"

>> AND
>> WITH  TRANS.DT = "" AND WITH ISSUE.DT <= "':ISSUE.DT:'" AND WITH 
>> ACCOUNT #
>> 600 AND WITH ACCOUNT # 506 AND WITH @ID UNLIKE DEL... ':PHRASE
>>
>> 0118:   STATEMENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:"SAVE.LIST 
>> PSES.TAPE.":ISSUE.DT:".":SUB.ID
>>
>> 0119:   EXECUTE STATEMENT
>>
>> 0 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
>>
>> 0 record(s) SAVEd to SELECT list "PSES.TAPE.03/31/02.M".
>>
>>
>> This does work:
>>
>>
>> 0117:   STATEMENT = 'SELECT DB.PSES WITH SUB.ID = "':ACTUAL.ID:'"

>> AND
>> WITH  TRANS.DT = "" AND WITH ISSUE.DT <= "':ISSUE.DT:'"'
>>
>> 0118: STATEMENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:'SELECT DB.PSES  WITH ACCOUNT # 600 AND 
>> WITH 
>> ACCOUNT #
>> 506   AND WITH @ID UNLIKE DEL... ':PHRASE:' SELECT.ONLY'
>>
>> 0119:   STATEMENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:"SAVE.LIST 
>> PSES.TAPE.":ISSUE.DT:".":SUB.ID
>>
>> 0120:   EXECUTE STATEMENT
>>
>> 265 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
>>
>> 265 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
>>
>> 265 record(s) SAVEd to SELECT list "PSES.TAPE.03/31/02.M".
>>
>>
>> On my production machine, the first statement works and yields the
same
>> results as the second statement from development
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jim
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>



-- 
Schalk van Zyl

-
GWK BEPERK/LIMITED (REG: 1997/022252/06)
POSBUS 47 PO BOX 8730
DOUGLAS

Direkteure/Directors: NB Jacobs, FJ Lawrence, J v/d S Botes,
JH Coetzee, JGD Smit, JF Jacobs, AO M|ller, JW Smit,
WG M|lke, JG Stander, JH van Dyk(MD/BD), JG Jacobs, A M|ller, M van Zyl,
Sekr/Secr: E van Niekerk.

Hierdie e-pos is onderworpe aan 'n vrywaring beskikbaar by:
http://www.gwk.co.za/DisclaimerVrywaring.asp
This e-mail is subjected to the disclaimer that can be viewed at:
http://www.gwk.co.za/DisclaimerVrywaring.asp
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV]Strange But True

[Adrian Matthews]

Presumable it's treating it as an exponential and the resulting numbers
are outside the precision comparison level so come back as equal.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjorn Behr
Sent: 12 January 2005 11:08
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV]Strange But True

Uv Version: UniVerse 10.1
OS : Windows 2003 Server

Can anybody explain. I wrote a small program and the result has baffeled
me.

Program:

 VAL1 = "43008E-112" 
 VAL2 = "43008E-108" 
 IF (VAL1 = VAL2) THEN   
CRT "THIS IS STRANGE"
 END 

It returns THIS IS STRANGE. Does anybody know why?

Regards
Bjvrn Behr
Programmer

HYFLO Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
Tel : +27 11 386 5800
Fax : +27 11 444 5391
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW : http://www.hyflo.co.za


---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Where are the Archives Now?

[Adrian Matthews]

Try www.indexinfocus.com



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Wolverton
Sent: Fri 24/12/2004 16:27
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Where are the Archives Now?



I need to find some info that was presented here about a year ago -- where
are the archives kept now?  Used to be a link on oliver.com, but it's not
linked there, and I don't see anything obvious on the U2ug.org web site...

Thanks!
David W.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe Windows XP

[Adrian Matthews]

>We use a Function Key for this We tell users to, say,  at the 
>"login" prompt... with  set for usually, user, password and login 
>account...


Ouch, obviously your company's auditors aren't as strict (good?) as
ours. We'd get strung up for allowing that. 




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] wIntegrate (on Universe) Question

[Adrian Matthews]

Try re-intalling the wIntegrate host programs. You should not be getting
problems "right out of the box" sounds like you might have the wrong flavour
of host programs installed.

Also have you checked your case invert settings as wIntegrate gets confused if
pasted text gets it case changed. Especially in the WIN.SERVER routines.

As a matter of interest, we don't use any of the standard programs anymore, as
they are so generic they perform quite badly. For instance our grid load
program is well over a 100 times faster than the standard method for over 50
rows.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anthony Dzikiewicz
Sent: Thu 16/12/2004 15:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] wIntegrate (on Universe) Question



I gave that a try and here are the results;


17. RECEIVING CALENDAR
18. RECEIVING CALENDAR SMITHFIELD
19. START WINTEGRATE

Which would you like? ( 1 - 19 )  ?19
Enter  ?  for help
wIntegrate Command >SCRIPT 'QUERY\QUERY.WIS'
wIntegrate Command >IS'
Press any key to return to the menu...


By the way the WIN.COMLINE compiles with warnings right 'out of the box' -
missing final end statement.  I applied the changes as you suggested and it
didn't compile at all.  So, I just did this;


0159: 3000  IF CMND = "WIN.SERVER" THEN
0160:  CALL @EXECSUB("WIN.SERVER",'','')
0161:   END ELSE

Just to make it easy to check it out.  No such luck

Thanks
Anthony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ian Renfrew
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] wIntegrate (on Universe) Question

You can try this:

Create a test program and insert the following three lines:

DATA "SCRIPT 'QUERY\QUERY.WIS'": @AM
EXECUTE "WIN.COMLINE"
STOP

Compile and catalog test program.

Modify program WIN.COMLINE (usually found in WIN.PROGS file). Locate and
modify the lines:

* Run a script
* At this point, we are assuming that the user input was either a
* script statement, such as:   Set Title "This is a window title"
* a script ID, as held in the file WIN.SCRIPT.
* or WIN.TRANSFER sent from the PC as a file transfer has been run.
*
3000  IF CMND = "WIN.TRANSFER" THEN
 CALL @EXECSUB("WIN.TRANSFER",'','')
  END ELSE
 IF SCRIPT.FILE AND LEN(CMND) < 100 THEN
READ DUM FROM F.SCRIPT, CMND THEN ;* Did the user enter a script
ID?
   CMND = DUM ;* Yes and its now in variable CMND
END
 END
*
 IF COUNT(CMND,AM) THEN
CALL WIN.HSCRIPTC(CMND)
 END ELSE
CALL WIN.COMSUB(CMND)
 END
*
END
 RETURN
* Run a script
* At this point, we are assuming that the user input was either a
* script statement, such as:   Set Title "This is a window title"
* a script ID, as held in the file WIN.SCRIPT.
* or WIN.TRANSFER sent from the PC as a file transfer has been run.
*
3000  IF CMND = "WIN.TRANSFER" THEN
 CALL @EXECSUB("WIN.TRANSFER",'','')
  END ELSE
 IF CMND = "WIN.SERVER" THEN
CALL @EXECSUB("WIN.SERVER",'','')
 END ELSE
 IF SCRIPT.FILE AND LEN(CMND) < 100 THEN
READ DUM FROM F.SCRIPT, CMND THEN ;* Did the user enter a script
ID?
   CMND = DUM ;* Yes and its now in variable CMND
END
 END
*
 IF COUNT(CMND,AM) THEN
CALL WIN.HSCRIPTC(CMND)
 END ELSE
CALL WIN.COMSUB(CMND)
 END
*
END
END
 RETURN

Essentially you're adding the ability to call the routine WIN.SERVER.

>From your menu, you should be able to execute the test program.

Regards,  Ian Renfrew

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] wIntegrate (on Universe) Question

I forget if there is a separate group for this product.  If so, sorry.
However, my problem is this;

I am evaluating the wIntegrate product.  One of the uses that we have for
this is the query builder/report viewer.  We have a person who used to
tinker at the command line.  We have long since pulled the plug on this kind
of thing, because they did some 'bad things'.  However, it is nice to let
them have the ability to query the data (after all it is theirs).  So, it
seems wIntegrate can do this for us.  My problem is that you need to be at a
command line to allow wIntegrate to operate.  So, we're back to square one -
user at the command line.

Our system is based on standard Universe menus.  Is there a way to add a
menu option (or create a VOC) that will allow the user to 'mess' with query
builder, etc  ?  I have tried adding WIN.SERVER as a menu option.  However,
this half works.  I created a simple query and tried to put it to the report
writer and it times out, because the WIN.SERVER closes.  If I send it to the
screen, it works ok.

Any workarounds to this ?

Anthony
---
u2-users mai

RE: [U2] [UV / UNIX] - Automatically retrieving Exchange Rate from the Internet

[Adrian Matthews]

We source ours directly from Reuters but that is likely to be a bit
expensive for your needs.

www.xe.com provides a free daily email of currency exchange rates, you
could write an app to load that or parse it from their web-site. As long
as you don't redistribute the data you should be legal as far as I can
tell from their website, but you should check with them first.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Farrant
Sent: 13 December 2004 12:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] [UV / UNIX] - Automatically retrieving Exchange Rate from
the Internet

All,
I have HP-UX B.11.11 and Universe 9.6.1.6

I need to update my app. with live (daily) currency exchange rate
information.  I used to do this by extracting information from a text
base file posted to the internet by the IMF but it appears that they
have now stopped doing this??  It struck me at the time that this was a
little precarious in any case.

Is there a proper / accepted way to do this?

Thanks in advance...

Mike Farrant
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions

[Adrian Matthews]

Wouldn't it be nice to be in a 9-5 environment again, I remember those days!

5 and 9 meaning something different to us these days; 99.999% uptime, which
equates to 5 minutes downtime a year.

Before we started using replication we use to do a UVBackup to a disk that was
then moved to a NAS server to keep a months worth of disk images on-line. This
happened every hour on the hour. Obviously we could never be sure of the
referential integrity of the database but we have programs that report on
missing transactions etc and I can't remember the last time we had to use a
backup anyway (apart from testing them every two days).



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Hester
Sent: Fri 10/12/2004 23:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions



Dave Schexnayder wrote:
> 2) Backups. I read another thread where the user indicated that they used
> UVBackup to create a file, and then the O/S backed up that file. Is that
the
> general consensus? Others I have spoken with have indicated that they use
> only an O/S backup. In that case, what about locks and users on the system?
> Is there a best way to do backups?

I've only done OS level backups, so I can't objectively compare them to
uvbackup, but this has worked fine for us since migrating to UV in '96.
   We do frequent restores of various archived files for accounting
report requests. Fortunately we're a 9-5 operation, so I have a window
at the end of the day where I can be sure no updates are happening on
the filesystem.

If you can't prevent writes during your backup, and you don't have a
mirrored filesystem you can break apart, there are a number of backup
solutions that can handle open files.  St. Bernard and Unitrends Backup
Professional are a couple.  St. Bernard works in conjunction with the
backup software of your choice, and Backup Professional has built-in
open file management.  It's my understanding that all files are saved in
a consistent state by monitoring the filesystem at the OS level and
caching any disk writes until the particular file is backed up.  This
gives you a backup of your filesystem as it was at a specific point in
time.  Of course you still have to start your backup at a point in time
when no transactions are in mid-stream if you want to be able to restore
everyting to a consistent state.

-John
--
John Hester
System & Network Administrator
Momentum Group Inc.
(949) 833-8886 x623
http://memosamples.com
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions

[Adrian Matthews]

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of HENDERSON MIKE, MR
Sent: Fri 10/12/2004 20:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unclassified RE: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions



We keep our Production databases on mirror sets*.
To backup, we quiesce the system, break the mirror, then start running
again (total time ~2 minutes).
Now backup from the 'broken' half of the mirror (use anything you like,
no files are open), then re-sync the mirror sets.

If you can't even afford a couple of minutes outage, then I think I'd do
it like this:
SUSPEND.FILES ON, mirror split, SUSPEND.FILES OFF, backup from the
'broken' half of the mirror using uvbackup, now re-sync the mirror sets.
And you really need to be using transactions in this scenario, otherwise
you risk not being able to restore to a consistent state.

HTH

Mike

* Actually, they're on an EMC array with a three-way mirror, so when we
do a mirror-split, we've still got a mirrored pair set of disks for our
production data and no one-disk failure vulnerability.  Disks are REALLY
CHEAP these days!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 11 December 2004 07:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions

Yet the problem with NT backup, or any non-universe oriented utility,
that saves ACTIVE files, is that it/they have no universe concurrency
control; you run a great risk of saving corrupted (pointers in
transition) images of files, UNLESS you make certain no users are
WRITING (updating).  That was the reason I was tasked with writing
uvbackup/ uvrestore back in '91: to create a utility that mimicked cpio
(albeit loosely) that understood the universe file structure and
implemented concurrency control.  I spent many long nights fixing broken
customer files because of exactly this...

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Caufield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions

I have found that uvbackup is not the answer NT backup works but is not
very good on compression. No matter what you use I highly recommend St
Bernard's Open File Manager it makes sure you can backup all files.

Tony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Schexnayder
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] UniVerse Backup/Resizing Questions

Hello,

We are rolling out our product on UniVerse 10.1/NT, currently we are
running on D3, and we have a couple UniVerse questions.

1) Resizing. When we asked IBM about resizing, their answer was "FAST".
However, I am not impressed with the product nor the expense, are there
any alternatives?

2) Backups. I read another thread where the user indicated that they
used UVBackup to create a file, and then the O/S backed up that file. Is
that the general consensus? Others I have spoken with have indicated
that they use only an O/S backup. In that case, what about locks and
users on the system?
Is there a best way to do backups?

Thanks so much for your help,


Dave Schexnayder
Cheetah Advanced Technologies, Inc.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please 

RE: [U2] Do we need to put a value in UniObject SubKeys

[Adrian Matthews]

There is no way to get wIntegrate to "share" the device license key that is
used by another UniObjects application.

I recently raised this with IBM and they confirmed that it is not possible so
if you have a client PC running a Uniobjects program and a wInegrate session
then they are going to consume 2 "normal" licenses but you will be able to get
20 device sessions (10 each).



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Jordan
Sent: Thu 09/12/2004 20:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Do we need to put a value in UniObject SubKeys



I have been investigating this further, whether we need to actually apply a
value to subkey in a uniobject client as the IBM documentation explains what
it is, but does not say that anything should be done.

My concern is, if we feed a value into subkey that this would then be
different to the ODBC and wintegrate/dynamic connect subkeys, how does this
then allow the server to recognise that these calls all came from the same
desktop.

I ran a test with a VB program without entering a subkey value and then ran
it multiple times from the desktop.  Running uvlictool this multiple
sessions but they only used one licensed seat which is correct.

I then ran dynamic connect and a session of the VB program and again
uvlictool showed multiple sessions that only took one licensed seat.

However when I ran dynamic connect and multiple VB sessions, the uvlictool
showed 2 seats was consumed. The curly was that the last line said only one
seat was used.  (This may be to do with a bug in the uvlictool that is
supposed to be fixed in the latest release)


Packages in use:   UVCS
2 license seats are in use.
3 license seats are available.

Packages in use:
UVCS has 5 licensed seats and 1 in use.




At the moment I assume we do not need to enter a subkey value.  Can anyone
else confirm this?

Regards

David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2][UD] How to access a particular ID in a select list

[Adrian Matthews]

Take off the <> from the DELETE line. Add a DATA Y
before the REPEAT and it should do what you want.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chauhan, Savita
Sent: 08 December 2004 14:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2][UD] How to access a particular ID in a select list

Hi,
Is there a way to access a particular ID in a select list?

I want to write a para to do the following:
Select a file with certain Ids and delete these selected records.

I was thinking of writing something like the following (to delete all
the records whose ID is greater than 5, say), but don't know what to
replace <> with in the following:

LOOP
SELECT XCF.SAV.TEST WITH @ID > 5
IF @SYSTEM.RETURN.CODE = 0 THEN GO DONE
DELETE XCF.SAV.TEST <>
REPEAT
DONE:

Is there a system variable that stores all the IDs in the select list?

Thanks
Savita.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniObject SubKeys

[Adrian Matthews]

The subkey only works if you are connecting to a Universe server that is
running device licensing rather than server licensing.

The subkey needs to be the same for each ten sessions otherwise each one
will be treated as an individual session.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of UmFooFoo Murphy
Sent: 07 December 2004 21:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] UniObject SubKeys

Hello All,

I have an application that needs to be able to connect multiple times to
a 
Universe Session.  When I run this application on my local PC I am
unable to 
connect to my local Universe while the application is running.
Likewise, I 
am unable to run the application while connected to a local Universe 
session.  I was told to use SubKeys to solve this problem and even
though I 
read and obeyed the blurb about SubKeys in the UniObjects documentation,
it 
still does not work.

I have a "TheSubKey" as Long variable that I increment each time I
connect 
to UniObjects, like this:

TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = Str(TheSubKey)
ObjSession.Connect

I used the Str() because results from a google search suggested that the

subkey needs to be a string value.  I have also tried it without using
the 
Str() like this:

TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = TheSubKey
ObjSession.Connect


Can anyone point me in the right direction please?

thanks
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

[Adrian Matthews]

IF you go to Control Panel, select Windows firewall, then choose the
Exceptions tab then you will be able to allow the program or unblock the
port.

Bit trickier if your settings are controlled from the domain though

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 07 December 2004 12:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hello,

We have Universe running on Windows with the Windows firewall installed,
but the firewall is stopping access to the UVODBC.

Normally I can configure firewalls to let the UVODBC through, but the
Windows one is not one that I am familiar with.

Has anyone got any experience with this and if so do you have the
settings required or any advice?

Thanks

Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this file back together?

[Adrian Matthews]

If you kill a telnet session that is running a resize on NT then you need to
kill the resize.exe process that it spawned as well. Otherwise it just keeps
on going as you found it. There are quite a few processes on the NT version
that work like that.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe Walter
Sent: Mon 06/12/2004 18:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this file back
together?



unbelievable - i just felt i had to post a follow up to this.

the resize process that we thought was dead and we closed the telnet
client that initiated the session and all - gave up on it - thought it
was a dead process.

we would have expected it to run in less than 1/2 hour.

well, anyway, low and behold when I got back onto that customers
system today to start restoring files - it turns out that the resize
actually finished up and the date/time stamp makes it appear as if the
resize ran for about 30+ hours - but the point is it did actually
finish - even after we killed the telnet client that started the session -
unbelievable.

the mystery still is - why did it take so long. yes, the new file
sizing parameters where dead on and the old file size wasn't all that
far off either.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Walter
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this file
> back together?
>
> was trying to resize a file on universe/NT and the process
> obviously got hosed up. it ran for upwards of three hours
> before we gave up on it.
>
> it is one of those blasted files with multiple data sections.
>
> so, we have the files
> AR
> and
> AR,HIST
>
> i was trying to resize AR,HIST. active users where accessing
> only the AR file itself, so i thought i could get by with
> resizing AR,HIST while others where online. it looks like it
> started to work, but should have completed in a matter of
> minutes based on past experience, so it did get hung up for
> some reason.
>
> if i display the files in the directory - i see the following:
>
> 11/30/04  03:10p  .
> 11/30/04  03:10p  ..
> 11/30/04  03:05p 2,569,728 AR
> 11/30/04  03:05p 5,343,232 HIST
> 11/30/04  03:10p 4,093,440 resizea00355
>5 File(s) 12,006,400 bytes
> 619,339,264 bytes free
>
>
> so, it looks like *maybe* the data for the HIST section and this temp
> resizea00355 file might actually have the data, but when you
> try to access the file AR,HIST from TCL your session just locks up.
>
> can still access just the live AR file - no problem there.
>
> anyone know how to piece this thing back together without
> restoring from backups?
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe on Windows - How to determine inode

[Adrian Matthews]

This builds a file that contains cross references inodes and works fine
on Windows. You could obviously modify it to query on a file rather than
building an xref file but I use this file to drive a modified list.readu
that shows real file names rather than inodes.

0001:   OPEN 'INODE.XREF' TO INODE.XREF ELSE STOP 'OE INODE.XREF'
0002:   PERFORM 'SELECTF TO 1'

0003:   LOOP

0004:  READNEXT FILE.NAME FROM 1 ELSE EXIT

0005:  CRT FILE.NAME

0006:  OPEN FILE.NAME TO F.FILE THEN

0007: STATUS STAT.ARR FROM F.FILE THEN

0008:WRITE STAT.ARR<27> ON INODE.XREF,STAT.ARR<10>

0009: END
0010:  END

0011:  CLOSE F.FILE
0012:  NAP 1

0013:   REPEAT


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid
Sent: 06 December 2004 07:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe on Windows - How to determine inode

Try

find  .  -inum  nn  -print

after cd-ing to the mount place of the file system
where the file is ( or above it ).  If You have no clue
use '/'  but it will quite some time.

nn  should be the inode You're searching for.

This should work for solaris at least.

HTH

-- mats


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>I have a client who is running Universe 10 on Windows.
>
>If I know a file name, I can determine the inode fairly quickly.
However, what if I know the inode but do NOT know the filename?  How can
I determine the filename from knowing the inode only?
>
>Thanks
>Will Johnson
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Scanner Connection

[Adrian Matthews]

We evaluated several off the shelf packages before writing our own. The main 
issues were that no single package had all the mandatory features that our 
users and regulators required.  

With 30 years worth of documents plus emails, PDFs, faxes etc etc most vendors 
ran for the hills when asked to store that amount of information. Universe 
doesn't even blink at it.

I agree that it makes sense to buy off the shelf in most cases but it can be 
much cheaper in certain circumstances to do it yourself. At #600 (for the 
scanning ActiveX control) plus a month of my time it was a bargain as we could 
re-use the existing Universe device licenses.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Hewkin
Sent: 01 December 2004 09:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Scanner Connection

Hi,

We scan about 5000 documents a day. These are then feed into an optical system 
for storage.
We have written apps that use these images.

We would never think about trying to write a scanning app. There are so many 
good ones on the market, why try to reinvent the wheel?

A good pakage should be able to do OCR.

Les.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2004 08:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Scanner Connection


I have a client using Accuterm with telnet sessions for all the users. One
user has a Bell & Howell multi-page scanner that gets around 100 pages per day
of work orders etc.

That user's emulator is Ve-Client from Visual Pick and they want to re-write
the app with Accuterm and some VB scripting if necessary. My question is where
would someone go to find out how this can be done.

It presently is done in VE with a 9,500 line program (4GL generated code) that
has oodles of includes and gets very busy. It still doesn't do what I would
like and that is for the scanner to write the scanned docs to a temp folder, I
would use Accuterm to load in those filenames and offer them to the user for
proper pc-filenaming to attach to the application.

I would appreciate any insight on this.

Thanks in advance.
Mark Johnson
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, you must 
not copy, distribute or disclose the contents; please notify the sender 
immediately and delete the message.
This message is attributed to the sender and may not necessarily reflect the 
view of Travis Perkins plc or its subsidiaries (Travis Perkins). Agreements 
binding Travis Perkins may not be concluded by means of e-mail communication.
E-mail transmissions are not secure and Travis Perkins accepts no 
responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst steps 
have been taken to ensure that this message is virus free, Travis Perkins 
accepts no liability for infection and recommends that you scan this e-mail and 
any attachments.
Part of Travis Perkins plc. Registered Office: Lodge Way House, Lodge Way, 
Harlestone Road, Northampton, NN5 7UG.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Scanner Connection

[Adrian Matthews]

We do something similar in wIntegrate with an ActiveX control (which we
wrote in VB6 using ImagXpress controls). 

Not sure if that's possible in Accuterm but I would expect it would be.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: 01 December 2004 08:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Scanner Connection

I have a client using Accuterm with telnet sessions for all the users.
One
user has a Bell & Howell multi-page scanner that gets around 100 pages
per day
of work orders etc.

That user's emulator is Ve-Client from Visual Pick and they want to
re-write
the app with Accuterm and some VB scripting if necessary. My question is
where
would someone go to find out how this can be done.

It presently is done in VE with a 9,500 line program (4GL generated
code) that
has oodles of includes and gets very busy. It still doesn't do what I
would
like and that is for the scanner to write the scanned docs to a temp
folder, I
would use Accuterm to load in those filenames and offer them to the user
for
proper pc-filenaming to attach to the application.

I would appreciate any insight on this.

Thanks in advance.
Mark Johnson
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] How to setup MALLOCTRACING?

[Adrian Matthews]

I can understand an edit of a 30mb file failing but the delete is a bit
strange.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: 30 November 2004 13:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] How to setup MALLOCTRACING?

The problem shows itself up in 2 ways:
 
1) DELETEing or EDiting a record from &COMO&, &SAVEDLISTS&, or &HOLD&
thats more than 30Mb fails with 'Available memory exceeded'
 
2) A number of reports on the system use the TEMP.LIST<-1> = TEMP.STR
construct and these are failing for big files. Unfortunately I cant
change this because I have no access to the source code and it would be
a major major exercise based on the size of the system.
 
Regards, Marco.



Adrian Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are you running within Universe?

Seems like quite a lot of memory to be using, none of our processes (on
Windows or Unix) ever go over 15mb of physical memory.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: 30 November 2004 07:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] How to setup MALLOCTRACING?

Hi Everyone,

I'm still battling with the 'Available memory exceeded' problem on Sco
Unixware. I haven't been able to receive feedback from anyone on the
list running UV on Unixware on how they have configured their system and
how much memory they can be mallocated in one big chuck. I can only get
30Mb max before the memory exceeded error is thrown even though I have 8
Gig RAM and am the only user on the system. The system runs nothing else
but UV and all possible Unixware parameters must be optimised for UV.

I want to turn on MALLOCTRACING to 1 in the hope that I will be able to
find out the exact nature of the failure. I have tried but then UV fails
to start with a missing parameter message. Does anyone know how to setup
the malloctracing? Where does the tracing information get written to and
how to interpret it?

Thanks for any help.

Regards, Marco.


-
Win a castle for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then
delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that
do not relate to the official business of this company shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and
IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/





-
 ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] How to setup MALLOCTRACING?

[Adrian Matthews]

What are you running within Universe?

Seems like quite a lot of memory to be using, none of our processes (on
Windows or Unix) ever go over 15mb of physical memory.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: 30 November 2004 07:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] How to setup MALLOCTRACING?

Hi Everyone,
 
I'm still battling with the 'Available memory exceeded' problem on Sco
Unixware. I haven't been able to receive feedback from anyone on the
list running UV on Unixware on how they have configured their system and
how much memory they can be mallocated in one big chuck. I can only get
30Mb max before the memory exceeded error is thrown even though I have 8
Gig RAM and am the only user on the system. The system runs nothing else
but UV and all possible Unixware parameters must be optimised for UV.
 
I want to turn on MALLOCTRACING to 1 in the hope that I will be able to
find out the exact nature of the failure. I have tried but then UV fails
to start with a missing parameter message. Does anyone know how to setup
the malloctracing? Where does the tracing information get written to and
how to interpret it?
 
Thanks for any help.
 
Regards, Marco.


-
Win a castle  for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV Citrix Accuterm

[Adrian Matthews]

Version of Wintegrate prior to 5 used to have this problem. We run 5.2 which
works fine with device licensing on terminal server.

Looks like Accuterm need a new licensing DLL from IBM.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Jenkins
Sent: Sun 28/11/2004 11:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UV Citrix Accuterm



The problem may be that AccuTerm seems to be using the IP address of the
Citrix server to identify when it should be using the IP address of the
client PC.

You should check with AccuTerm that they are using the appropriate Windows
system calls and librarikes - different calls are used to get the client IP
address and the terminal server IP address. Could be a library version
issue

(i.e. 10 sessions per server rather than 10 sessions per client - yes?)

Seen this before.. wIntegrate, SBClient and Dynamic Connect use the
client IP address

Regards

JayJay




I'm not certain of  the ramifications of Citrix, but my understanding is
you get 10 concurrent login sessions per licenced AccuTerm user.So if
you licence Accuterm on a single-user basis, that user can login
concurrently 10 times... IIRC site licences covering 50 and 250 users are
obtainable, thereby giving *each* logged-in user 10 concurrent
sessions   At least, that's my understanding of Dynamic Connect and
wIntegrate "device licencing"

>Any ideas will be most appreciated... We need to get off these old antique
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this
message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by replying to this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any
copies of it.  Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a 
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[Adrian Matthews]

I couldn't move files from our Windows to Solaris system if they had
previous triggers on them. We no longer use triggers on our files but
something stays set in the header as LIST.SICA works on the files.

IBM support themselves said it was not possible to move files with
triggers (either current or past) from Windows to Solaris and they would
have to be re-created on Windows, copied over and then Fnuxi'ed, which
is what I did in the end.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2004 16:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

Interesting question...

If you are referring truly to "file" triggers (ie, not triggers on SQL
tables), then it depends on how Denver implemented it.  The usage of
triggers was previously relegated to purely being allowed against SQL
tables, due to the SICA that all SQL tables contained.  We outlined to
the
Denver team a means to implement "file" triggers, but it depends on how
they
implemented it.

With normal SQL files, due to the SICA and SQL information needed, you
couldn't do a straight "fnuxi" on the file, as this only deals with
byte-ordering.  For normal files, any given file can be copied over to a
new
system and made live by adding a VOC pointer and fnuxi'ing the file.
But,
SQL tables require additional paperwork to make it happen, including the
schema and definition defined at the system level (UV_TABLES, etc...).
So,
to facilitate this, fnuxi has an option ( -export | -import ) to allow
you
to export/import SQL tables.  

When you do so, it creates a sequence of actual export scripts that can
then
be transferred to the new system, along with the file, to facilitate a
proper fnuxi/transfer.

If the implementation of the "file" triggers includes this SICA
information,
in a similar fashion to a normal SQL table, it's likely you need to run
this
(or similar) fnuxi option to ensure the export of the Trigger
information,
so when you run the corresponding '-import' on the target system, it
will
properly set up the Triggers.

But, ultimately, one of the Denver folks would have to answer the
question...  But, it's worth a try... if you run "fnuxi -export FILE",
do
you see the corresponding "EXPORTxxx.yyy" files being created?

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

The original question was about file triggers. If you move files between
systems that require fnuxi to be run on them then it will not work even
if the triggers are removed. If you don't need to run fnuxi then they
work fine.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2004 15:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

This is correct... It's purely an issue with byte-ordering of the
systems.
In fact, there's nothing to say that if you could run windows on a
big-endian based architecture that you wouldn't have to run fnuxi when
transferring files between Windows accounts.

In fact, we had this issue years ago on some Unix platform, where the
vendor
(don't remember which one off hand) had two processor architectures,
with
different endian-ness.  Some customers found it odd that transferring
files
amongst same "machines" caused them to have to run fnuxi.  In reality,
while
they had the same Company logo, they weren't the same...

Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Two machines running the same OS is fine. It's just Windows to Unix
and
> vice-versa (and any other combo that requires fnuxi to be run).

WRONG WRONG WRONG.

I've transferred type 30 files between three different machines - SCO,
linux
and Windows - and the files are *BINARY* *COMPATIBLE*.

The thing is, they *all* run on x86 boxen. Most nix boxen are
big-endian,
all doze boxen are little-endian, hence the assumption it's a doze/nix
thing. But it isn't - it's an endian thing.

Some systems (SPARC?) can be either big or little endian, so you could
find
yourself having to run fnuxi to transfer files from a machine to itself,
should you have a dual-boot system ...

Cheers,
Wol
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
> Sent: 19 November 2004 14:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi
> 
> Is everything still OK for copying files between two like machines for
> purposes of replicating for a test system then? I can get around the
> i

RE: [U2] [UV] Initialization Error

[Adrian Matthews]

Unix or Windows?

We had a similar problem recently and it turned out to be the memory
allocation for Windows processes. We had to change a registry setting.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Haglund
Sent: 19 November 2004 15:40
To: U2 Users
Subject: [U2] [UV] Initialization Error

I am receiving an error when trying to run a phantom:

An error has occurred during uniVerse initialization
 Please contact the system administrator
 Error code:  1  25


I have not been able to find a listing of what the error codes translate
to.
Does anyone have an idea?

Thanks,

Bryan Haglund
Haglund Consulting Inc.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] ODBC Errors

[Adrian Matthews]

The 81002 error relates to the unirpcservices file. Either the data
source is not present or the service name is missing.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Harkin
Sent: 19 November 2004 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] ODBC Errors

Some developers I work with have a daily processing batch that queries
a UniVerse DB (10.0.3) and then writes the result set to an Oracle
instance.  The code is written in java.  We use a product called
JDataConnect as an ODBC/JDBC bridge.  Last night the job failled.  I
have a lot of error code data that the app logs returned, but I do not
know where to research the error codes. I do not have a support
account either (the database is used for a commercial applciation, and
that vendor actually has the support account for our licenses.  ANd
the vendor will take a while to figure this out).  Any advice on how
to troubleshoot this is appreciated.

Here is a snippet from the logs:

RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  Begin process at Fri Nov
19 09:12:51 EST 2004
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  Querying TR Date at Fri
Nov 19 09:12:52 EST 2004
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  TR Date = 2004-11-18
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  Starting TR Query at Fri
Nov 19 09:12:55 EST 2004
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  Ending TR Query at Fri Nov
19 09:13:02 EST 2004
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.populateTRvimHOLDINGS():  ITERATING through TR
Data at Fri Nov 19 09:13:03 EST 2004
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.populateTRvimHOLDINGS():  Insertion failed! 
Trying to roll back db transactions.

-++-Regular Exception-++-
RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldings():  ServerException:
[ODBC Error], SQLFetchScroll DBVendorCode:81002:,
DBState:S1000:. 
[IBM][UVODBC][27004 16]Error ID: 46  Severity: ERROR  Facility:
DBCAPERR - UCI Error. Func: SQLFetch(XIO); State: IM985; uniVerse
code: 81002; Msg:
[IBM][SQL Client] [RPC] error code = 81002.

java.sql.SQLException: ServerException: 
[ODBC Error], SQLFetchScroll DBVendorCode:81002:,
DBState:S1000:. 
[IBM][UVODBC][2700416]Error ID: 46  Severity: ERROR  Facility:
DBCAPERR - UCI Error. Func: SQLFetch(XIO); State: IM985; uniVerse
code: 81002; Msg:
[IBM][SQL Client][RPC] error code = 81002.
at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.FromServer($Connection.java:954)
at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.ToServer($Connection.java:1016)
at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.ToServer($Connection.java(Inlined
Compiled Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.getRowset($ResultSet.java(Compiled
Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.Move($ResultSet.java(Compiled Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.next($ResultSet.java(Compiled Code))
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.populateTRvimHO
LDINGS(Unknown
Source)
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldin
gs(Unknown
Source)
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.main(Unknown
Source)
java.sql.SQLException: ServerException:[ODBC Error], SQLFetchScroll
DBVendorCode:81002:, DBState:S1000:.
[IBM][UVODBC][2700416]Error ID: 46  Severity: ERROR  Facility:
DBCAPERR - UCI Error. Func: SQLFetch(XIO); State: IM985; uniVerse
code: 81002; Msg:
[IBM][SQL Client][RPC] error code = 81 002.

at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.FromServer($Connection.java:954)
at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.ToServer($Connection.java:1016)
at JData2_0.sql.$Connection.ToServer($Connection.java(Inlined
Compiled Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.getRowset($ResultSet.java(Compiled
Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.Move($ResultSet.java(Compiled Code))
at JData2_0.sql.$ResultSet.next($ResultSet.java(Compiled Code))
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.populateTRvimHO
LDINGS(Unknown
Source)
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.loadTRvimHoldin
gs(Unknown
Source)
at
com.ohis.operations.reconciliation.RetrieveTRvimHoldings.main(Unknown
Source)
RetrieveTRvimHoldings:  ERROR - RetrieveTRvimHoldings FAIL
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities

RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[Adrian Matthews]

The original question was about file triggers. If you move files between
systems that require fnuxi to be run on them then it will not work even
if the triggers are removed. If you don't need to run fnuxi then they
work fine.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2004 15:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

This is correct... It's purely an issue with byte-ordering of the
systems.
In fact, there's nothing to say that if you could run windows on a
big-endian based architecture that you wouldn't have to run fnuxi when
transferring files between Windows accounts.

In fact, we had this issue years ago on some Unix platform, where the
vendor
(don't remember which one off hand) had two processor architectures,
with
different endian-ness.  Some customers found it odd that transferring
files
amongst same "machines" caused them to have to run fnuxi.  In reality,
while
they had the same Company logo, they weren't the same...

Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Two machines running the same OS is fine. It's just Windows to Unix
and
> vice-versa (and any other combo that requires fnuxi to be run).

WRONG WRONG WRONG.

I've transferred type 30 files between three different machines - SCO,
linux
and Windows - and the files are *BINARY* *COMPATIBLE*.

The thing is, they *all* run on x86 boxen. Most nix boxen are
big-endian,
all doze boxen are little-endian, hence the assumption it's a doze/nix
thing. But it isn't - it's an endian thing.

Some systems (SPARC?) can be either big or little endian, so you could
find
yourself having to run fnuxi to transfer files from a machine to itself,
should you have a dual-boot system ...

Cheers,
Wol
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
> Sent: 19 November 2004 14:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi
> 
> Is everything still OK for copying files between two like machines for
> purposes of replicating for a test system then? I can get around the
> issue
> of between OS's but now I'm worried about recreating the test
> environment.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian
Matthews
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi
> 
> I had the same problem recently. IBM told me you can't; once a file
has
> been SQL'ised (which adding triggers does) you can't move it between
> OS's. Even dropping the triggers won't work.
> 
> All you can do is to create a new file on the source machine and copy
> the data to it and then port that one over instead.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
> Sent: 18 November 2004 21:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi
> 
> I have some data files that I can't run fnuxi on because they have
> triggers.
> How do I successfully move these files between *NIX and Windows
without
> having to drop the triggers?
> 
>  
> 
> Jay Falck, CISSP, CHSS
> 
> Unicorn Computing
> 
> 512-563-4132
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and
for
> the
> use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not
> the
> intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
others
> this
> message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying
to
> this
> email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email
and
> any
> copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the
> official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
> nor
> endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised
and
> regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by
the
> Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[Adrian Matthews]

Two machines running the same OS is fine. It's just Windows to Unix and
vice-versa (and any other combo that requires fnuxi to be run).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: 19 November 2004 14:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

Is everything still OK for copying files between two like machines for
purposes of replicating for a test system then? I can get around the
issue
of between OS's but now I'm worried about recreating the test
environment.

Thanks,

Jay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

I had the same problem recently. IBM told me you can't; once a file has
been SQL'ised (which adding triggers does) you can't move it between
OS's. Even dropping the triggers won't work.

All you can do is to create a new file on the source machine and copy
the data to it and then port that one over instead.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: 18 November 2004 21:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

I have some data files that I can't run fnuxi on because they have
triggers.
How do I successfully move these files between *NIX and Windows without
having to drop the triggers?

 

Jay Falck, CISSP, CHSS

Unicorn Computing

512-563-4132
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for
the
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not
the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others
this
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to
this
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and
any
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
nor
endorsed by it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Help with EVAL in SELECT statement

[Adrian Matthews]

Shouldn't really have a decimal point in it. You should always store
data in internal rather than external format.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: 19 November 2004 10:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with EVAL in SELECT statement

Tom,
 
Here is a CT of the item. The field we are interested in is 25.
 
Press any key to continue...
0022
0023 0.000225
0024 0.000225
0025 0.000225
0026 0.000225
0027 0.000225

Tom Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does the real data look like. CT that item, 0048108, and lets
see
how the data is really stored.

Tom Dodds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
630-235-2975 Cell
708-482-4510 Office



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Help with EVAL in SELECT statement


Thanks for the suggestion but I want to know is why this doesnt work.
What
looks broken?

"Allen E. Elwood" wrote:Looks broken.

Why not make a dict to round it up to MD2 and then just select
everything
with a balance not equal to zero?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco Manyevere
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 08:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Help with EVAL in SELECT statement


Martin,

Here again:

SELECT F.ACCOUNT WITH EVAL "ABS(BALANCE)" GT 0.01
15480 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
>>LIST F.ACCOUNT EVAL "ABS(BALANCE)"

0955485 1972.55
0971405 114629.25
0987328 45803.12
0048108 0.0002
2006146 54125.35


SELECT F.ACCOUNT WITH EVAL "ABS(BALANCE)" GT 0.01
15480 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
>>LIST F.ACCOUNT EVAL "QUOTE(BALANCE)"

0955485 "1972.55"
0971405 "114629.25"
0987328 "45803.12"
0048108 "0.000225"
2006146 "54125.35"


Here is the DICT record for BALANCE
0001: D
0002: 25
0003:
0004: BALANCE
0005: 19R
0006: S
Bottom at line 6.

Martin Phillips wrote:
Hi Brian,

I can see that this will run on a bit

> I think Mats is correct.
>
> The 'field' in question is an EVAL expression, so doesn't have its own

> conversion code unless you explicitly state it using the CONV keyword.
Hence
> the confusion over the result.

EVAL takes on the properties of the first item in the expression, in
this
case BALANCE.

Regardless of what it is doing, the output of displaying BALANCE should
be
equivalent to the value used in the comparison. It would be interesting
to
see the results of EVAL "QUOTE(BALANCE)" as I thing this is going to
show
that the field is faulty in some way.


Martin Phillips
Ladybridge Systems
17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB
+44-(0)1604-709200
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


-
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win #10k with Yahoo!
Mail
to make your dream a reality.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



-
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win #10k with Yahoo!
Mail
to make your dream a reality.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


-
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win #10k with Yahoo!
Mail to make your dream a reality.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] SSH and wIntegrate

[Adrian Matthews]

There is also an article in the same place that explains how to set
wIntegrate to use SSH via the dialer menu (using PuTTY). It's a bit
clunky at first but it does work.

I also raised the lack of SSH support with IBM and their attitude is
that SSL is a much better solution than SSH. Not what the rest of the
industry would seem to think, I would like to see a 6.1 release with SSH
support (anyone listening!!)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2004 03:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] SSH and wIntegrate

> Ken wants SSH, but wIntegrate and the U2 server products
> support SSL.
> 
> Almost every other telnet client available - even free
> ones like TeraTerm - supports SSH, but wIntegrate &
> Dynamic Connect don't.  Also the U2 Windows telnet servers
> are not SSH-capable, so you can't use an SSH telnet client
> at all on a Windows / U2 solution.
> 
> I have raised this before (with IBM, too) and cannot
> understand why they have chosen the SSL approach rather
> than the more industry-standard SSH for telnet
> connections. 

Thanks Mike,

Indeed, that is how it is.  My client would like to use SSH.
 Indeed, they currently have telnetd switched off on their
new boxes and they don't want to start it up unless
absolutely necessary.

I found an article (
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=686&context=SSKJMP&q1=SSH&ui
d=swg21081430&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
)on the IBM web site which included the following info:
-
wIntegrate version 5.1.0 and later supports the SSL (Secure
Sockets Layer) protocol for secure connections to the host.
There are no plans to officially support SSH (Secure SHell
or Secure Socket Shell) which is another way to secure
communications. SSH is incompatible with SSL. 

SSL is a protocol implemented in the communications layer so
most TCP/IP processes can support it. For example, HTTPS and
FTPS are SSL-secured implementations of HTTP and FTP. In
wIntegrate we use SSL with the Telnet process. SSL is a much
better solution than SSH and will be used by the U2
databases for secure connections.
-

I'm particularly interested in the line "In wIntegrate we
use SSL with the Telnet process".  does anyone know what
that relly means?  How does one configure telnetd on a UNIX
box (Solaris 9 to be specific) to accept SSL connections and
talk to wIntegrate.  Further, if this can be done, can we
make sure that ONLY SSL connections are accepted?

Best Regards,

Ken
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

[Adrian Matthews]

I had the same problem recently. IBM told me you can't; once a file has
been SQL'ised (which adding triggers does) you can't move it between
OS's. Even dropping the triggers won't work.

All you can do is to create a new file on the source machine and copy
the data to it and then port that one over instead.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Falck
Sent: 18 November 2004 21:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] [UV] Help with fnuxi

I have some data files that I can't run fnuxi on because they have
triggers.
How do I successfully move these files between *NIX and Windows without
having to drop the triggers?

 

Jay Falck, CISSP, CHSS

Unicorn Computing

512-563-4132
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Monitoring file changes

[Adrian Matthews]

You could add a security subroutine to the ED (and others like DELETE if
you wanted) voc item. If you put a subroutine name into field 4 of a
remote dict item then it will get called whenever that command is
executed.

We have one of these on the MASTER command. 
 MASTER

0001 R

0002 UV.VOCLIB

0003 MASTER

0004 *ITAudit

 UV.VOCLIB MASTER

0001 Verb - Used by System Administrator only!

0002 master

0003 E  



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Pflugfelder
Sent: 17 November 2004 15:12
To: u2-users
Subject: [U2] Monitoring file changes

Universe 9.6.2.1
Dec OSF1 V4.0F

In our payroll application, we've got a file, EMPMAST which is indexed
(Blacksmith Index for those that are curious).  Occasionally, records
are disappearing from the file, but not from the index.  The only way
that this should happen is from TCL.  I've checked the file for
corruption and it doesn't seem to be corrupt.  It's a dynamic file, but
so are most of our other files and we don't have any problems with
those.

Is there some way that I could monitor the file to see who deletes or
changes records?  Is there something else that I should be concerned
about?

I'm not sure if it will help, but I'm including an ANALYZE.FILE EMPMAST
STATS:

File name ..   EMPMAST
Pathname ...   EMPMAST
File type ..   DYNAMIC
Hashing Algorithm ..   GENERAL
No. of groups (modulus)    4501 current ( minimum 1, 93 empty,
1441 overflowed, 46 badly )
Number of records ..   18625
Large record size ..   1628 bytes
Number of large records    0
Group size .   2048 bytes
Load factors ...   80% (split), 50% (merge) and 80% (actual)
Total size .   12236800 bytes
Total size of record data ..   7385520 bytes
Total size of record IDs ...   82020 bytes
Unused space ...   4765164 bytes
Total space for records    12232704 bytes

-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] LIST.INDEX Build info

[Adrian Matthews]

Once the index has been setup then there is no reason why it should ever
need to be rebuilt as long as the conditions it was setup under don't
change.

So they really are that low maintenance.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2004 15:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] LIST.INDEX Build info

I have a report I run every week that prints the output of LIST.INDEX on
all files that have indexes.  These are I_X files in Unix where I
'field' off the I_ and do LIST.INDEX X and send the output to the
printer.

I see the under the "Build" column, it always says "Not Reqd" (except
for
new indexes that really do need to be built) and I'm wondering if that
message can be trusted. In other words, are these UniVerse indexes
really
that low maintenance?

-- 
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/