** Reply to message from "Rich Sias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Feb 2004
11:13:28 -0500
> Well, I got to start my searching for gainful employment. I have used 2.5 weeks
> just working on refining the resume, it is near done soon and I need to gather
> potential sites near where I live first.
Jeff,
We use a two pronged attack - I don't think I can share it (sorry) but here
is what it does - none of it should be too difficult to emulate:
First we have some BASIC routines that stamp our programs with a string in
the format:
ADGVERDATA='Version=x;'
ADGVERDATA:= 'VerDate=xx;'
Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
"wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in each post
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scrol
I am pleased to announce that version 7.10 of DOWNLOAD is
available for free from:
ftp.cedarville.edu
For those not familiar with DOWNLOAD, it is a "command-line"
utility which extracts data from Unidata/Universe databases
and produces output files in a variety of formats (XML, HTML,
tab-delimite
Question: Using WinteGrate, running UniVerse 10, Unix - Is there
a way to display a 'jpeg' file in UniVerse ?
We have trucking companies that send up 'proof of
deliveries' in jpeg format. Our user base would love
to be able to v
Put all the jpegs in a directory on the nix box.
Share that directory to the doze boxes using SAMBA.
Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
I'm not sure how you do it, but I think you can just try to execute the
jpeg, and Windows will automatically invoke the de
I checked the global catalog space for our UniData account and the
subroutines are there and are the same version as are in our UniData bin
directory.
Thanks,
Kerry Gasque
Systems Developer/Analyst
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/19/2004 1:44:47 AM >>>
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::
> I am using Visual S
Hi Gwen
We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors
We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us "that 10.1 would fix it"
thereby admitting
the prob
If it's not at the top it generally goes in the deleted folder. I haven't
got time to go searching through the text for an answer.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and p
Try Susan Joslyn's PRC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
> On Behalf Of Jeff Steinmetz
> Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2004 3:20 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: version control software
>
>
> I am looking for a version control application for U2
> software development. Ideally it
(Somehow, a few lines of code were omitted from
the DOWNLOAD.PROCESS subroutine in the version that
I posted about 8am EST (1pm GMT) today. Corrected files
were posted at 9:25am EST. The missing lines would have
caused associations to not be terminated correctly in
XML in some situations. My apol
It's a beautiful thing. Thank you most kindly
Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen fie
Hi Schalk
Have faith!
Perhaps an upgrade to 10.1.1 would help you, like IBM has
promised will
help us? (see my other post)
We've found Kurt Neuman at UTwo to be helpful - if he
doesn't know, he
will find out and get back to you - who is your VAR? We use
ProSol, and
find Erik de Kok friendly and
> We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
> Backup Exec, tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
> errors
Sorry, I missed the original post...but for what it's worth - we also run
UV10.0.4 on W2k and use Backup Exec with no problems. Only comment is you
should i
Subject: UniVerse and Backup Exec
Gwen,
We found the following Techtip (#1299) from Epicor to help with Backup Exec
and Universe.
It has to do with a registry setting to allow Universe and Backup Exec
to play nice on a Windows NT server, the same setting might work for a
Windows 2000
Server.
Hello,
I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.
However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one sec
Hi, it sounds to me that you are not using any indexes.
In UD there is CREATE.INDEX and BUILD.INDEX commands you need to run.
Björn Eklund
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 16:04
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: [UV] Very slow
Are you backing up just a user-accounts partition, or are you backing up
the UV account itself, too?
We had an issue with backup software (I think it was BackupExec) and
backing up the UV account. If the NT client code is the same as the nix
code (ported from nix) that could be your problem ...
W
César,
I think we will need more information to help you.
1. are you running the SQL query at TCL or through ODBC or OleDB?
2. Can you give the command you are running please.
3. Are there any indexes on the files? (LIST.INDEX filename ALL)
Regards,
Brian Leach
-Original Message-
F
Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)... I think the pc command
you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default instal):
/
But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).
As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or not
I did it your way Anthony. It did in fact fire up the default
viewer, whether I was testing with jpg, bmp or tif. Seems to allow
just what I wanted.
Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a p
Good to know. So if I need to, I can do that too :-)
I just wonder who sent the original posting recommending IE (and when)?
I'm convinced our anti-spam is dropping some mail, as I regularly see
replies to emails I've never seen ... (coupled with the tendency now on
this list to oversnip - deletin
Here is a reprint of that for you Anthony...
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate
Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
Dawn, you're coming to D.C.? Email me privately, and I'll do my best to get
you that desired beverage.
Hugh
___
Hugh Pritchard (Tier), 202-546-3066, cell 301-467-1712
D.C. Ofc of Corporation Counsel, Child Support Enforc
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Brian Leach
Enviado el: jueves, 19 de febrero de 2004 16:22
Para: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Asunto: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query
César,
I think we will need more information to help you.
1. are you running t
First of all, thanks to all who have replied to my post! I'm attempting
to combine all replies in this one e-mail.
A couple people mentioned alternate backup methods. One was to do a
uvbackup and run Backup Exec and the other was to backup remotely.
Since IBM does not want Backup Exec to exist
QUOTING NAG
Please refrain from quoting all of a message when replying to one or
more points in it.
The general guideline of netiquette when replying to messages is that
you should quote only about four lines of the *most recent* post for
each point to which you are responding. If you are repl
This issue also exists in UD...
On windows 2000, around 50 UD sessions will make things start to shake
violently.
I personally think IBM/Informix should have their butts kicked for not
CLEARLY documenting this issue, or fixing it.
My solution was to install ArcServe! LOL
-m
-Original Messa
This was meant to be private, not via the list. I am not picking on
Jerry alone, as many who are receiving these reminders will attest.
In-line vs top posting, whatever. Neither is any excuse for the laziness
of not trimming.
--
Regards,
Clif
Moderator wrote:
QUOTING NAG
Please refrain fro
Cesar,
You need to build the index also, try BUILD.INDEX ALL
In Unidata that is.
Björn Eklund
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 17:24
Till: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Ämne: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query
-Mensaje or
We currently have an option of upgrading to either UniData 6.0.3 or
6.0.9. Is there anybody currently on 6.0.9 under Solaris 9 that could
offer a "report card" on it?
Thanks!
Katie
M. Katie Morgan
Manager of Enterprise Data Systems
Pacific University
2043 College Way
Forest Grove OR
Anyone out there got Universe Objects (UVOaif.ocx etc) that is
compatible with version of 9.3 of Universe? We have a client with this
version who has "mislaid" their disks and IBM cannot supply
replacements.
Graham Hansen
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/l
Yes, we have used it heavily (in production) about month or so without any
known problems.
Lembit Pirn
7+7 Software
Tondi 1
Tallinn 11313
Estonia
+372 65 66 232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Katie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Februa
[unsolicited testimonial]
We've been using PRC (www.sjplus.com) for about 4 years, couldn't be happier with it.
Software:
Unidata 5.x on HP-UX
SB Server 5.x
Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions, etc.
-
> Dennis also mentioned a registry tweak. I'm guessing that
> possibly this is contained in the tech tip that Steve posted.
I didn't catch the nature of the errors, but the registry tweak may have to do with
the Windows SharedSection parameter that relates to telnet service.
Users that conn
We are currently running uv 9.6.2.1E on DG/UX (quickly disappearing) and
are considering a simultaneous uv upgrade and shift to Windows OS.
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003. Is anyone currently running at this
version? Any concerns o
Rich,
We will have an opening for a programmer/analyst in the near future at Loyola College.
Check out our web page. www.loyola.edu
HTH
Debra
Debra J. Gonski
D.B.A., Systems Development
Technology Services
Loyola College in Maryland
410-617-2931
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED
Finally! Some good news from
http://www.afsi.com/news/press_view.asp?contentid=204.
Ron White
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Folks,
Our system administrators have recently seen a few examples of System Error
Message 100102 "get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level 0." appearing in
the UV ERRLOG.
Can anyone tell me what this means, and what (if anything) we can do about
it?
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server
Thanks
Thanks for this, Tom
Do you know if the 48MB limit has been increased in Windows 2003 Server?
What would you think is the practical ceiling on the number of Telnet users
caused by this 48MB limit - assume a UV server not used for anything else?
Thanks
Mike
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Ron,
We currently have 4 customers running on Win 2k3 with UniVerse 10.0.17 and
with 10.1. We have had them running for about 3 to 4 months now and have
not had any issues related specifically to the OS or new UV. That is to
say, the few problems we have seen were known issues on earlier releases
System Error Message 100102 "get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level
0." appearing in the UV ERRLOG.
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server
Mike,
I can't tell you what your error means but I just noticed your version.
We had some problems implementing this version of UniVerse on Win2000
server.
Gwen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gwen Buck
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:26 a.m.
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
>
> Mike,
>
> I can't tell you what your error
I am posting this for LeRoy. The new list server doesn't seem to like
Lotus Notes yet.
--
Regards,
Clif
Original Message
Subject:Re: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:57:56 -0700
From: Leroy Dreyfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
I had the current clients posted on the PE site to replace the original 6.0
clients.
Haven't made the download any faster, though :-(
Good luck!
Wally Terhune
Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Support
IBM Data Management Solutions
Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On UV versions 9.4.1.1d through 9.6.1.3 as far as I know...
We have a great many paragraphs (third party app) that contains a line like
this:
IF THEN GO OUT
...however, there is no OUT: label in the paragraph. Somehow, this works. Is
"OUT" some kinda built-in label?
I'd like to know because I
How about getting the PE version of UD 6 replaced with a current build
also.
:-D
>I had the current clients posted on the PE site to replace the original
6.0
>clients.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Ok, this is a very simple question, and I know I ought to know the answer,
but it's been too long since I've done one...
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or just username.
I want username. After my upgrade, I have DOMAIN/username. H
UV.LOGINS file?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Glenn W. Paschal
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 11:44 a.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP
> Importance: High
>
>
> Ok, this is
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn W. Paschal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or
It's in the registry. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE -> SOFTWARE-> IBM -> UniVerse
-> CurrentVersion
Create a DWORD value 1 Key of UseShortUserNames
-Original Message-
From: HENDERSON MICHAEL MR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:59 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject
> IF THEN GO OUT
>
> ...however, there is no OUT: label in the paragraph. Somehow,
> this works. Is "OUT" some kinda built-in label?
Don't think so, it seems like any undefined label will abort from the
paragraph.
*
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank
you
I know about the message thing, but as we are doing an upgrade, and the
existing software depended on short usernames...
Again,
Thanks.
--Glenn.
<>
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or n
Ken Wallis wrote (different thread):
With decent tuning you should be able to find a reasonable compromise
between making lots of memory available for big jobs without lumbering
little jobs with a huge footprint. Even on AIX now there are some extended
shared memory facilities which allow you
Hi All,
I am researching the possibility of whether our application system, written
in SB+ running on Unidata on HPUX on HP9000, can be "enhanced" with
double-byte characters so that we could use Chinese characters in our Taiwan
location. Is it possible? If it is not possible with the current
on Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
> "wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it.
I think Charlie is write to point out that dogmatism on any matter is
usually wrong. Ray
Our VAR just sent our UniVerse support bill for next year. We are running
UniVerse 10.0.0.1 on Windows 2000 Sever.
It is $72/user license. With 60 licenses, that is $4320, plus the windows
support at 865.00.
We used them for some support over the year, but mostly it was related to
their inst
Hello,
While this position is not primarily U2 related, experience with Epicor's
Avante ERP/MRP (on NT/UniData) would be useful.
Thank you,
Eric Y. Neu
Sr. Programmer Analyst
Zetron, Inc.
PROGRAMMER ANALYST/DATABASE ADMINISTRATOR (601-001W)
Responsibilities:
Zetron, Inc., a recognized ind
go to pickjobs.com. there's one in wilkesbarre.
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Sias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: [OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA
> Well, I got to start
<>
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003. Is anyone currently running at this
version? Any concerns or issues?
<>
There is a bug in compiler of UV 10.1.0 which is being addressed by IBM and should be
fixed in the next sub release.
--
u
Dennis,
Thanks!
We still have faith, it's just the joy that's gone!
I think you are correct, this will go away if we upgraded to 10.1.?
We are awaiting the CD's.
Meanwhile..
Schalk.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:45:40 +0200, Dennis Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Schalk
Have faith!
Perha
62 matches
Mail list logo