provide some kinda code converter to convert
all pick stuff to DB2 Stored Procs or Java Native Compiled Procedures.
I belive this would be ideal and would help corportations intergrate
systems easily.
Joe Eugene
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil
do appreciate MS.NET C# cause of
some of its advanced techniques and performance stuff.
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:30 AM
> To: 'U2 Users Discussion List&#x
DB Job?
As for Performance...UV Does NOT Perform Well in a OLTP Environment,
SIMPLE:
IF UV did Perform Well...Today's Fortune 500 would depend on UV and
UV/PICK
would have been in the TOP 3 OF DataBases.
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
t; I have done Java integration with UV/RedBack and am familiar with
> UNIJ...thats all I want to know about the details of UV Java!
>
> I belive developers should appreciate technology for
>
> 1. Performance
> 2. Scalability
> 3. Ease Of Integration.
> 4. Advanced Techniques.
>
This is a Constructive Argument... Don't you have an argument to prove
that UV is efficient rather than getting to Personal Stuff.!
I have done my homework on Stress Testing Applications...
If you can prove UV is efficient... DO IT!
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> F
s..
All Rules are Embedded within Programs (PICK)... So basically taking
Data
out of its Container to do a bunch of Business Logic.
How is the above efficient?
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Brian Leach
>
ET
just a little more better than Java J2EE?
CAUSE:
MS Had more money to PUMP into R&D and were able to REFINE some of
the Techniques...e.g. Core improvement in RUNTIME ENVIROMENT AND
COMPILATION.
I know you are one of the GURU's OF UV System, it nice to hear some
agreement on this arg
Dave,
Thanks for the Interesting Conversation/Argument.
I did learn something from the Folks here who were willing to share
information while I was researching UV. Thanks to ALL.
Wish the Next Forum and UV all the Best.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
tch to UV/MVDBMS.
Never seen any Enterprise Software (SAP, PeopleSoft etc) mention UV on
their Web Sites Never seen a book on UV OR PICK at Barnes & Nobles.
Perhaps you can explain where UV plays an Important Role.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PR
believe UV Performs Well.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Results
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Modern Universe - was: The lists ar
t;
> Regards
>
> David Logan
> Database Administrator
> HP Managed Services
> 139 Frome Street,
> Adelaide 5000
> Australia
>
> +61 8 8408 4273
> +61 417 268 665
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing
>
> Dude, your like the dog that just won't stop humping the guests leg.
Get
> over it already.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
quot;STATS" please.
>
> We may be able to help you after all.
>
> Cheers
>
> Trevor Ockenden
> OSP
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Request Time out Errors from the DB.
I can post JRUN LOG Files here where UV took more than 3 Minutes to
Process Requests. I can't believe people on this LIST get so Defensive.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
What is your DEAL... Am Not Interested in Learning PICK/BASIC Or
spending
my valuable hours on some legacy technique.
You can call it WHATEVER you want... Does it really Matter?
You seem to be VERY Interested in Trivial things and stupid comments!
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAI
Country and State you are goona do the above..
Why NOT just relate the data between the combinations within the DB
with Data Relations...and just leave the data where it belongs...
Hell alot of LESS Code.. right?
You can clearly see where Procedural Technique is Highly In-Efficient.
Thanks
Dont you still get it...? Think a little bit HARDER!...
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:31 PM
>To: U2 Users Discussion List
>Subject: Re: Modern Universe -
Real Funny ;)
I have Spare Time alright.. and you have MORE TIME TO
Reply to "Stupid Topics" than TO *HIT* DELETE KEY.
Does that give you a HINT?
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adel
Clif,
Sorry... I kept this discussion to the best of my Professionalism,
until a few folks here Provoked with some serious name calling.
Its appears bad enough...
some folks here cannot discuss stuff in a constructive argument.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From:
, requires big process
> power.
>
> Hell, even AS400 can do things, that's why they were built.
>
> It's just that mine can do ANY thing, no limitations, very
> little
> processing power (R83 on a single 286), costs? What costs?
>
> -Original Message-
No More Posts from me... The above is all I have to say on this topic.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Les Hewkin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:56 AM
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subjec
feel my comments are without SUBSTANCE...
WHY NOT ARGUE BACK with some Valid Proof...
Instead of start Calling People Names... like school kids!
Yes, it is only Normal when People Fail or Run out of Arguments... they
start making Personal Remarks... This Denotes their FAILURE!
Joe Eugene
> --
OR MACHINE.
Please post your PICK/BASIC Statement.
Also you might want to dump the data in a separate table... other than
something you use for other things.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Sara Burns
> S
prove that UV Comes back in 5 Seconds under the above
Conditions...I would be most happy to agree that UV is Competitive.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30,
less than 1 Million
Records
in MS-SQL Server with NO Indexes, which proves very good performance.
I have never seen this Kinda Good Performance in any UV Programs/Against any
UV Files
within UV/PICK/BASIC.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
y... you want a CASE-INSENSITIVE Search like
select firstName from CustomerMaster where firstName like 'Sar%';
and replicate the same code on Universe... returning all the results.
Please let me know if you are able to do this.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
__
have done does NOT involve using the SQL Interface in UV,
Our UV Shop uses FILE Types, NOT RDBMS Tables and we use
PICK/BASIC/REDBACK to Interfact with these FILES.
Perhaps the problem might be our UV Shop using PICK/BASIC...
Maybe the SQL Interface on UV is much faster. I dont know.
Thanks,
IVE Search and returns
all the below
Sara
sarra
saRraA etc.
The UPCASE and LOWCASE only Returns those results right?
So in your Experience, would you say SQL Interface is Faster than
any other Interface within UV?
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
>One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise)
>wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION').
I brought this up a couple of times, nobody seemed to be interested
to check the difference.
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAI
nly had 800,000 Records.
This kind of Operation normally takes "ZERO" Milliseconds in any Enterprise
RDBMS.
I had nothing to say but LAUGH!.
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Ray Wurlod
>Sent: Sunday,
>Personally I would be surprised if either database had a way of handling
>leading wildcards other than an exhaustive scan.
Use "Contains"/English Query. See MS-SQL Server Docs.
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
ant.
Here is the code, if you would like to test.
declare @stime dateTime;
set @stime = getDate();
select count(*) from CustomerMaster
print dateDiff("ms",@stime,getDate())
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Beha
*Disciple*** of any Technology... What Works well is the Best
Tool.
Yes, i am saying UV does NOT Perform/Scale Well with LARGE Amounts of Data.
If you Dont Agree, Prove it... Everybody can Talk.. Where are your Test
Results?
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
haha :) Real Funny Man! When people LOSE an Argument..
They start Bitching and calling Names Just like you!
You know what we call them...L***ERS!
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of David Scoggins
>Sent: Monday, Apri
n this happens.
HTH
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Barry Rogen
>Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:19 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: UniVerse and RedBack
>
>
>
>I was not sure whether
U2 TO DB2 ---> Best thing to Happen.
Hopefully IBM will start integrating all IBM DB's into Flagship RDBMS
UDB.
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Roger Glenfield
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:
Hey Kevin,
Interesting to see you are on this list. We have a few reports
that take around 2-5 minutes to execute via RedBack, perhaps
you can help try to speed up the logic.
Joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin King
Sent: Sun 2/22/2004 6:31 PM
To: U
37 matches
Mail list logo
