rawbody LR_IMAGE_TAGGED_ASP =~ /\img width\=1 height\=1
src\=.*\.asp.*/i
There are a couple of things to consider here. The first is that rawbody
only gives the rule a single physical line of the message, so if the target
you are looking for spans lines the rule will never hit. If your target
That's a new one for me. Cool.
I tested it out. And sure enough... shut down Outlook 2003, made the
registry hack for Outlook 2003 it suggested, started Outlook 2003,
downloaded new emails and VOILA! When you view the headers, it now shows
the complete original email source... looks like the
If you use amavis then you will not be able to use spamd/c. You will also
loose the ability to FULLY manipulate the available headers in sa.
If you write your own scripts then you can spamd/c. You will also be able to
add any sa header you want.
Amavis reads the spamassassin.pm and compiles it
jplesset wrote:
SA 3.0.1, yes.
So, because I see 11-12 processes, even with -m 3, what should I do
about it?
jay
Hi,
I'd check to make sure that you are actually running 3.x and that there
are no old libraries around. I'm sure one of the devs will have better
information.
Regards,
Rick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jplesset writes:
Hopefully . . .
I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops
to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so.
Guys -- we've heard this occasionally.
There should never be more than (--max-children) + 1 spamd
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However you should examine what proportion of mail nowadays, arriving
from
the internet, *is* addressed to multiple users in the one SMTP
transaction. This may appear to be a major failing, but in my
experience
it's just not, in real-world use.
In
jplesset wrote:
I'm very sure it's 3.0.1, yes. 2.xx didn't do this at all. I'm new to
this forum, not sure what you mean by one of the devs. . .
thank you
jay
Hi,
Reply to the list as that is where the devs (the developers of SA) live.
I'm just a user of SA, although I hope a cluefull user
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:43:30AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:12:47PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
It seems to me that could improve performance (a little bit) - a whole
bunch of I/O could be skipped...
It's the whole message. Most of the time spamc gets data
Hi there
I've been getting a fair amount of missed spam with SA-3.01 that looks like
it would have been caught if it wasn't for ALL_TRUSTED.
e.g.
-2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts
0.2 RISK_FREE BODY: Risk free. Suuurr
0.8
There should never be more than (--max-children) + 1 spamd processes
running; if anyone can catch a server doing otherwise, and figure out
*why*, we'd much appreciate it ;)
This was a bit of a coincidence. Read this email this morning, and then
30mins ago my SA server slowed to a absolute
Jason Haar wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:43:30AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:12:47PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
It seems to me that could improve performance (a little bit) - a whole
bunch of I/O could be skipped...
It's the whole message. Most of the time spamc
Hi,
I noticed the other day that the latest version of spamass-milter (I don't
know how long the feature has been there) has a cmd line option to block
mail that exceeds a certain score so this might help you if you are running
sendmail.
What I'd really like to do is to be able to define a
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:10:04PM -0500, Dave Goodrich wrote:
What about those of us using spamd on another host? I would have to then
access a file on a shared (NFS) volume. I can't believe that the IO of
NFS would perform better than piping the message. But, I am just getting
my teeth
About a week ago my rules_du_jour cron job starting failing on the lint check.
I'm running SA 2.64 on a Debian sarge system kernel 2.4.25. Here's the end of
the errors I get if I run rules_du_jour in foreground.
Lint output: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
I am receiving spam from subdomain (example given below) of a domain listed in
URBL.
How to block this kind of email?
--
deduct the cost for rx now
value magnifier on rx meds
it's far from a do-it-yourself pharmacy and leave
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:57:14 AM, Khalid Waheed wrote:
I am receiving spam from subdomain (example given below) of a domain listed
in URBL.
How to block this kind of email?
If you mean SURBL and urirhssub, SpamAssassin and SURBLs will
reduce these to the registrar domain
Hi there,
I have SpamAssassin running on my email gateway servers.
After upgrading to 3.0.0 the following errors started appearing every time I
run sa-learn:
Argument 4.O isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 244.
Argument 4.O isn't
just to check am i right in thinking that the ham folder is there to
expliicity stop false positives coming through the filters? ie based on
domain or list or email address content etc or is that just a
superficial explanation...?
ronan
Hi,
On a Redhat 7.3 ( 2.4.20-28) with SA 3.0.1 :
installation and filtering is good, but from time to time, each 3 or 4 days no
more
message is filtered, despite the spamd deamon is still active.
- I try to upgrade the number of child process of spamd from 5 to 10
but keep the same problem ;
OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed with my RH9 and
postfix. They
all seem to work fine together. Lots of spam are stopped now.
But still some are remaining. What can I do to improve its performance, please?
You probably wont stop all of them. I too am new to spamassassin and
learn more each day. Look at www.rulesemporium.com for additional rules
you can put in place to help block additional spam.
Ron
Ron Nutter
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:40, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Good afternoon,
I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell
through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed
everyone else's upgrade on the list. Not sure just what went wrong.
At 12:14 PM 11/4/2004 +, you wrote:
just to check am i right in thinking that the ham folder is there to
expliicity stop false positives coming through the filters? ie based on
domain or list or email address content etc or is that just a superficial
explanation...?
What do you mean by ham
At 04:20 PM 11/4/2004 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
I've been getting a fair amount of missed spam with SA-3.01 that looks like
it would have been caught if it wasn't for ALL_TRUSTED.
No, it should not.
You have one of two problems:
1) SA is confused about trust. This typically happens if your
-Original Message-
From: Chris Denton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:46 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sa-learn gives strange errors
Thanks very much for your help, Candee.
Most welcome; glad I could help.
It was indeed 4.o
Sean Doherty wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:40, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Good afternoon,
I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell
through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed
everyone else's upgrade on the list. Not sure just what went wrong.
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:52, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:40 PM 11/3/2004, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Good afternoon,
I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell
through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed everyone
else's upgrade on the list. Not sure
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 14:14, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Sean Doherty wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:40, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Good afternoon,
I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell
through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed
everyone
At 02:19 PM 11/4/2004 +, Sean Doherty wrote:
Matt, does this mean that even if trusted_networks is set in local.cf,
SpamAssassin will fire the ALL_TRUSTED rule even if it can't parse
the received headers? i.e. Since there are no parsable received
headers, SA will assume that all must have been
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:19 PM 11/4/2004 +, Sean Doherty wrote:
Matt, does this mean that even if trusted_networks is set in local.cf,
SpamAssassin will fire the ALL_TRUSTED rule even if it can't parse
the received headers? i.e. Since there are no parsable received
headers, SA will assume
At 09:54 AM 11/4/2004 -0500, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Yes I just submitted a bug on the matter.. Currently ALL_TRUSTED fires
whenever there are no untrusted relays detected.. However, it fails to
check that any trusted relays exist...
I opened this bug to suggest a fix for ALL_TRUSTED:
Sean Doherty wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 14:14, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Sean Doherty wrote:
I will look into that, I didn't set it as I want no network to be
trusted. I'll reread what I can find on that.
Just set trusted_network 127.0.0.1
Yes, this fixed it.
Since you hit ALL_TRUSTED certain other
Thanks everyone, testing with several messages and comparing to 2.64
scores looks good now.
Three issues,
1) My test message was munged and SA had problems parsing the headers.
Used unmangled messages and SA parsed them fine.
2) Set trusted networks to 127.0.0.1, so no network is trusted.
3)
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 15:04, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Check out trusted_network section of Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
i.e no RBL tests on trusted networks.
If you're running with DNS checks enabled, SpamAssassin includes code
to infer your trusted networks on the fly, so this may not be
I'm having a weird problem that shows up every day about 50 times in a
burst.
My logs show this:
Nov 4 01:11:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd[12335]: Cannot open bayes databases
/var/spool/filter/bayes/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
Nov 4 01:11:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd[12335]:
At 10:06 AM 11/4/2004, Mike Carlson wrote:
Do you have to add private IP addresses to the trusted_networks list? I
only added the public IP Addresses that are set up for our mail server but
it does have a private IP and is being NAT'd.
SA is going to see the IPs as the machine running SA sees
At 10:17 AM 11/4/2004, Sean Doherty wrote:
JMHO, but shouldn't all networks be considered untrusted unless a user
specifies otherwise?
I got to agree with you there - especially given that the inference
algorithm doesn't work in every environment.
Unfortunately this only solves one aspect of the
Hi all,
I use spamassassin 2.63 on fedora core 2.
I have two problems :
1. Spamassassin does not flag all spam, although muy level is at 3. Sometimes he
doesn't even have ONE hit on a spam message !!!.
2. I want to move the spam messages to a specific folder, how to do that ?.
My
Hi,
i ve downloaded a lot of rules witch sounds to detectes the spam i got. I
ve saved them in /etc/spamassassin. But now i still get all the spam like
before. I really new sorry but should i activate them or is spamassassin
looking by each mail in the /etc/spamassassin dir and check the mail
At 10:53 AM 11/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use spamassassin 2.63 on fedora
core 2.
I have two problems :
1. Spamassassin does not flag all spam, although muy level is at 3.
Sometimes he
doesn't even have ONE hit on a spam message !!!.
You're running a rather old version of SA, one which
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:17 AM 11/4/2004, Sean Doherty wrote:
JMHO, but shouldn't all networks be considered untrusted unless a user
specifies otherwise?
I got to agree with you there - especially given that the inference
algorithm doesn't work in every environment.
Unfortunately this only
I have attached a snippet of the output of spamd -D that talks about URIDNSBL
debug: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL from @INC
debug: plugin: registered Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c75694)
debug: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash from @INC
Max
local rules normally go in /etc/mail/spamassassin where you should also
find a local.cf file.
make sure the user that's calling spamassassin (or spamc etc) can read
the files.
No comment on the qmail side of things as it's not my thing.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:17 AM 11/4/2004, Sean Doherty wrote:
JMHO, but shouldn't all networks be considered untrusted unless a user
specifies otherwise?
I got to agree with you there - especially given that the inference
algorithm doesn't work in every environment.
Unfortunately this only
Since I was in trying to figure out if URIDNSRBL was working I noticed a few
more errors that were coming up:
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject
1
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: subject_tag
(SPAM) _HITS_
At 11:14 AM 11/4/2004, Jim Maul wrote:
While i agree that trusting no one doesnt really solve the problem, I dont
believe it is just as bad as trusting everyone. Trusting
everyone stops other rules from firing and adds atleast -2.something to
every message. This seems far worse than trusting
At 11:28 AM 11/4/2004, Mike Carlson wrote:
Since I was in trying to figure out if URIDNSRBL was working I noticed a
few more errors that were coming up:
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
rewrite_subject 1
debug: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
/hitete
So I can remove those lines and change auto_learn to bayes_auto_learn?
Speaking of bayes, I also noticed this error:
debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/tmp/spamd-648-init/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
I read a thread somewhere that said I really didnt have to worry about that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
You can use one of a few available milters.It will allow your sendmail to
reject messages classified as spam in SMTP session. Rejecting in response to
the final
- Original Message -
From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have attached a snippet of the output of spamd -D that talks about
URIDNSBL
debug: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL from @INC
debug: plugin: registered
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c75694)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/04/2004 10:40:19 AM:
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays
to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
/hitete
Fairly easy to do. Quite a few people on the
list are doing this. Personally, I use milter-spamc available at
We have a nice e-mail setup with 5 inbound mx boxes (Qmail +
QmailScanner + ClamD), 4 spamd boxes, 2 outbound smtp, 1 imap/pop
server, and a pq (problem queue) box that mx can re-route mail to if
there is a customer issue.
Every box is a Dual CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean Doherty writes:
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 15:04, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Check out trusted_network section of Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
i.e no RBL tests on trusted networks.
If you're running with DNS checks enabled, SpamAssassin includes code
Hi all,
I've installed NET:DNS, but do I need to put an option in local.cf in order for
SA to query RBLs ?.
I've got many domains in my local.cf file...
===
I've got a webmin interface which is correctly configured.
If I manage the SA level
I want to limit ressource usage of spamd with ulimit, but I'm unsure about
what the ulimit options mean and how they translate to the spamd
situation. I think mostly of the memory limit options.
F.i. with a spamd process of about 95 MB
(size 96540 RSS 94M Share 2308)
using these memory limits
At 11:40 AM 11/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
Generaly you need a MTA layer integration like mimedefang, MailScanner,
etc. Check the wiki.
I just installed 3.0.1 to replace 2.63 and have noticed a tremendous
improvement in speed. I am using a RH 8.0 system with spamc being
executed by /etc/procmailrc.
I have limited the child processes to 3, and noticed that the child
processes do not appear to die although their time and dates do
At 12:30 PM 11/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed NET:DNS, but do I need to put an option in local.cf in
order for
SA to query RBLs ?.
No.
By default, SA will use RBLS provided that Net::DNS is installed and
appears to be working (it tests with a quick DNS lookup of a major domain)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
As others have said, easy enough.
I'd suggest you start without SA -- simply ensure that the relay
host can deliver to your internal host(s).
We
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 09:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I use spamassassin 2.63 on fedora core 2.
I have two problems :
1. Spamassassin does not flag all spam, although muy level is at 3. Sometimes
he
doesn't even have ONE hit on a spam message !!!.
2. I want to move the spam
Here is my procmailrc :
==
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw:
* 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
HERE I'D LIKE TO DELETE THE MESSAGE THAT HAVE THAT MUCH TAGS HOW IS IT
Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory standpoint:
spamd -m 3 --max-conn-per-child=3
But now I'm seeing this in my mail logs every few seconds:
Nov 3 15:46:58 mail spamd[18881]: server hit by SIGCHLD
Nov 3 15:46:58
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
HERE I'D LIKE TO DELETE THE MESSAGE THAT HAVE THAT MUCH TAGS HOW IS IT
POSSIBLE
You could send it to /dev/null using something like:
{
:0
/dev/null
}
Pete
Can anyone point me to a site where I
can download webuserprefs-0.5? I've
tried the author's site for a couple of
weeks now but I can't get a response
and it is not available on freshmeat.net
now.
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Wolvington
Oban Lambie wrote:
I've now gone over 24 hours without a lock up and am thinking that I've
got the correct servers and --max-conn-per-child configured. However, I
am seeing a lot of these entries in the error logs (about 1 every 30
seconds)...
Nov 4 11:26:31 mail spamd[14372]: server hit by
Oban, the log entry you see does not appear to be an error, but
confirmation of what you set. Child processes are killed off after
processing 3 messages. Then a new one is started. That's what you're
seeing.
jay
Oban Lambie wrote:
Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15, Lisa Casey wrote:
Hi Folks,
.
.
There has to be a easy way to learn to use this and get it to do what I want
but I can't really figure it out. Surely there are some other ISP's on these
lists who might be willing to tell me how they use it.
Thanks,
Lisa
Rick Macdougall wrote:
How ever, a quick look at the mimedefang page tells me you want to do
something like
if($hits 15)
return action_discard();
or something similar after calling the spamassassin check routine.
Yes, that's the way to do it. Alternatively you can use
action_bounce(),
Hi,
As a fellow newbie, I have struggled to get everything working for the
past two weeks as well, and I can see you are having some of the same
problem I had(still having), so here's my $0.02, hope it helps, and
for the experts out there, please correct me if I'm wrong with any of
my assumptions!
Lisa wrote:
Also, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to feed it spam. I have
Sendmail/Qpopper
and most of my users pick up their mail using Outlook Express. I
understand
I can't just forward spam to a spam mailbox and run sa-learn on that as
the
forwarding will not get the original headers.
We've
Hi Lisa:
Hi Lisa:
Spamassassin basically justs tags emails as spam. You need other programs
like procmail to actually dispose of it.
We run email for about 5000 domains and around 20,000 users. We use qmail
with qmail-scanner for virus scanning and then vpopmail with qmailadmin,
maildrop and
Spamd1 - 4 handle an average of 1.5 million messages per day, 810 per
minute.
Each box is configured to a max child of 128, and usually hover around
70% cpu idle, and 500 megs of ram free.
Very impressive. I have a single spamd box, running 3.0.1, with four
3gHz Xeons and 4-gigs of memory. It's
I'm a little confused between the difference between the contents of the
/usr/share/spamassassin folder and /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
It is my understanding that /usr/share/spamassassin should only contain the
default filters that come with SA and /etc/mail/spamassassin should only
contain
Kris Deugau wrote:
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words
in the subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
*VERY*, **VERY** dangerous in an ISP environment!! I would STRONGLY
recommend AGAINST this. It has far too much potential to backfire on
you.
We use
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Kang, Joseph S. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:10 PM
To: Oban Lambie
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64
BTW could you
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 04 November 2004 18:31
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: PROCMAILRC problem
|
|Here is my procmailrc :
|
|===
|===
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:53:03PM -, marti wrote:
|| /usr/bin/spamc -f
Not sure what the -f suffix is for, I see no such suffix in the man pages
It's a deprecated option. It's accepted but doesn't do anything these days.
fyi.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I find this a nice feature but
Please, don't CC me. I subscribe to the list.
Fred wrote:
We use action_bounce to stop mail from coming in for 5,000+ accounts
and all of our customers love it. You will always have 1 person who
doesn't want their mail scanned no matter what. It is doable in an
ISP environment but it takes
-Original Message-
From: marti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Spamassassin
Subject: RE: PROCMAILRC problem
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 04 November 2004
System Attendant wrote:
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
Place = ; mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com;
users@spamassassin.apache.org; ; mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sender = Kris Deugau
Subject = [Mimedefang] Re: Frustration...
Delivery Time = November
J Thomas Hancock wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:21:15 -0600:
It is my understanding that /usr/share/spamassassin should only contain the
default filters that come with SA and /etc/mail/spamassassin should only
contain custom filters.
correct. They are not really filters, though, but rules.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lisa Casey wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:15:20 -0500:
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words in the
subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
Please, do NOT bounce. You just bounce to other spam victims.
If you don't bounce, what do you do ?
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lisa Casey wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:15:20 -0500:
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words
in the subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
Please, do NOT bounce. You just bounce to other spam victims.
Depends how you do it.
If you
- Original Message Follows -
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Frustration...
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:39:43 -0500
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words in
the subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
Please, do NOT bounce. You just
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:39:43 -0500, Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
If you don't bounce, what do you do ? /dev/nulling the message is not a
real option since mail should never just vanish, and in the case of
false positives, the sender would never get the rejection message.
Some
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
- Original Message Follows -
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Frustration...
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:39:43 -0500
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words in
the subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
Please, do NOT
87 matches
Mail list logo
