Le 11/11/13 12:19, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hi Charles,
Next time I'm sure you can join us in the weeks during which we
discussed the survey on the marketing and project's list :-)
Gladly, but the main reason I'm not on, or only rarely follow, the
marketing list, is because of what I
Le 11/11/13 14:59, Duncan Adams a écrit :
Hi Duncan,
I am attempting to connect a query such as
select quantity from item_table where location_id = 1 and item_id = 1
and owner_id = 1
to a Libreoffice Calc cell for instance sheet1.d7
I don't see how you can do this absent the use of a
Thanks for your input Dan!
Best,
Charles.
Le Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:15:55 -0500,
Dan Hall dih...@myfairpoint.net a écrit :
For what it's worth... I'm just a casual user of LO. It was
installed on my new computer when I bought it a year and a half ago.
I got on this list because the spell
Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:17:31 +0100,
Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 11/11/13 12:19, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hi Charles,
Next time I'm sure you can join us in the weeks during which we
discussed the survey on the marketing and project's list :-)
Hi :)
If a troll gets banned they usually just find another new name or even
go so far as to set-up a new free email account
The only ways that seem to work are
1. To let them know their behaviour is being (possibly) misconstrued
as unhelpful and unfriendly
2. avoid taking any notice of them
Brian
If you are using a Mac 10.9 then you can move a Tool Bar icon simply by
clicking on the gap to the right of the icon.
When the object frame appears, drag the fame to where you want the icon,
let go and the icon will move.
I use CT2N when I copy and paste from a web site and it works, with
Hi Jim
James E. Lang wrote
Pardon my ignorance. I don't even know what Nabble or gmane are. If they
are social media then this old geezer doesn't participate and that's by
choice. Mailing lists, product specific forums, and even (to a limited
extent) IRC channels are fine.
Nabble is an
Hi Ken
snowshed wrote
But, basic things should work right. In my list I have here, but have
not tested in 4.x.x
You are right. It is sometimes amazing how simple things don't work or stop
working (regressions)...
But overall they tend to get better. I sincerely recommend that you give
Hi Urmas,
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 05:35 +0700, Urmas wrote:
Then why does the LO site not feature a warning on a front page: User,
you are ...
So - trying to condense something positive out of this; it sounds like
we should have something (perhaps in the BSA) that explains to
newcomers,
Hi Ken,
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:33 -0700, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of bugs/issues. I
wanted to contribute in the area of reporting issues, but I don't have
the knowledge to fix them. I didn't expect those problems to go to the
head of the
Servus Micheal,
true, what you are saying, but one little thing:
Am 12.11.2013 11:46, schrieb Michael Meeks:
[ given the vast disparity in time-to-file (1 minute) vs.
time-to-fix (5 man days avg) ]
...in correlation with 1 developer investing 5 days to fix it vs.
maybe hundreds, thousands or
Stefan Weigel wrote
Am 12.11.2013 11:46, schrieb Michael Meeks:
[ given the vast disparity in time-to-file (1 minute) vs.
time-to-fix (5 man days avg) ]
...in correlation with 1 developer investing 5 days to fix it vs.
maybe hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands of users
I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that the LO
developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I'm pretty sure that that is very false. They work on LO because they
want to work on LO, and they probably choose what to work on based on
at least the following:
Paul-6 wrote
I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that the LO
developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I didn't mean to say that.
I'm aware that some developers work on whatever is needed and fix the most
urgent bugs/regressions.
But out of 300
CC'ing the website list because it is about the website, but I'm not
subscribed, so please CC me on replies if you really want to discuss
this complaint.
On 2013-11-12 5:53 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com wrote:
The problem of course is that there is no queue of bugs-to-fix. We
Paul,
Just completing Pedro's answers inline...
Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:31 -0800 (PST),
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com a écrit :
Paul-6 wrote
I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that
the LO developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I didn't mean to
On 11/10/2013 11:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello,
As there were some exchanges about the survey here and as I advertised
it on this mailing list as well, I thought you might be interested by
my initial analysis:
Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:57:20 -0700,
John Meyer johnme...@pueblocomputing.com a écrit :
On 11/10/2013 11:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello,
As there were some exchanges about the survey here and as I
advertised it on this mailing list as well, I thought you might be
interested by
Hi I'm using the Frutiger Font (ttf, linotype) for several Years now for
my work an have al lot of Documents and Templates.
Since upgrading to ubuntu 13.10 (libreoffice upgraded to 4.1.2) the
Frutiger isn't displayed correct in libreoffice-writer. Only the top
half of the Font is visible. If
On 2013-11-12 8:53 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
How do I just log into the bug reporting system and search it? Anyone?
Ok, so I just decided to go ahead and go through the submission process,
and afterwards was finally able to search. I didn't find any similar
bugs, so I
For me I tried to navigate bugzilla to report continuing bugs where 2
formatting issues occur regularly:
1. Some cells in Calc have mixed size formatting in them or mixed fonts (parts
are in Geneva 10 and parts in Geneva 12) I can go in by hand to each cell,
select the piece that is the wrong
You made a survey without a survey statistician on your team. Did you
send out a request for such a person on the mailing lists to advise you
before you put together the survey? Did you have a clear and concise
question that you wanted to answer before you developed the survey
questions? Did
Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:29:47 -0700,
John Meyer johnme...@pueblocomputing.com a écrit :
You made a survey without a survey statistician on your team. Did you
send out a request for such a person on the mailing lists to advise
you before you put together the survey? Did you have a clear and
Okay, I point out problems and you're response is you don't like it
you can run out your own survey and then say I'm inaccurate without
stating why I'm inaccurate with a solicitation for donations in the
previous e-mail. Do you see the major issue here? Flies, honey, vinegar.
I don't know how
John,
I'm well aware on how to run a project; and many comments and
critiques I have read so far are valid. Just keep in mind that we're
not going to run just another survey because according to some, it
wasn't granular enough (btw: there are others who would object to your
methodology as being
Charles,
What's expensive about setting up a mailing list dedicated to the
survey and asking internally what do we want to know about users and
how do we want to find out about it? Or doing some requests for
volunteers from local university statistic students? Your volunteers
don't
bill william at techservsys.com writes:
On 2/23/2013 3:00 PM, Luuk wrote:
Not any good answers, and not any bad answers.
No answers at all. ;(
Seems no one is interested in being able to edit via a browser
I can not imagine why I would want to.
Why would I want to ?
John,
Okay, that sounds different from what I initially understood. :-)
I thought you wanted to restart the survey. Anyway, thanks for the tip.
We'll take more care about phrasing what we want in the first place
next time. However, I suggest you read the archives of our marketing
list during the
2013/11/12 David Lastovicka da...@lastovicka.cz
bill william at techservsys.com writes:
On 2/23/2013 3:00 PM, Luuk wrote:
Not any good answers, and not any bad answers.
No answers at all. ;(
Seems no one is interested in being able to edit via a browser
I can not
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Lastovicka da...@lastovicka.czwrote:
bill william at techservsys.com writes:
On 2/23/2013 3:00 PM, Luuk wrote:
Not any good answers, and not any bad answers.
No answers at all. ;(
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of bugs/issues. I
wanted to contribute in the area of reporting issues, but I don't have
the knowledge to fix them. I didn't expect those problems to go to the
head of the line. But I *did*
On 2013-11-12 9:53 AM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tanstaafl,
LibreOffice is using freedesktop.org infrastructure for bug
management software and code repository.
Ok, this doesn't help me any, but ok... ;)
How do I just log into the bug reporting system and
Den 12.11.2013 16:47, skreiv jomali:
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
I am using Dropbox for that purposes. It is free up to a few Gb of storage.
Kolbjoern
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Lastovicka da...@lastovicka.czwrote:
bill william at techservsys.com writes:
Hi Charles
Tanstaafl wrote
That would help for that one issue, but I still don't have a clue how to
log into the bug system and work with bugs...
You are right that the current documentation won't take you there :)
Go to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
and click on Log In (second item from
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
CC'ing the website list because it is about the website, but I'm not
subscribed, so please CC me on replies if you really want to discuss this
complaint.
I've also cc'd the QA team (who manage/work on the bugtracker,
Hi :)
Something that often annoys me is that we seem to ignore all the work
of all the devs who are paid to work on LibreOffice.
I thought something like 10%-20% of devs are employed by various
companies, governments and other organisations? The advantage for the
organisations, companies and
Hi Tanstaafl,
LibreOffice is using freedesktop.org infrastructure for bug management
software and code repository.
How do I just log into the bug reporting system and search it? Anyone?
This is a list of all LibreOffice
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Kolbjørn Stuestøl
kolbjo...@stuestoel.nowrote:
Den 12.11.2013 16:47, skreiv jomali:
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
I am using Dropbox for that purposes. It is free up to a few Gb of storage.
Kolbjoern
Dropbox != LogMeIn. Dropbox just
Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote
Den 12.11.2013 16:47, skreiv jomali:
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
I am using Dropbox for that purposes. It is free up to a few Gb of
storage.
LogMeIn is not the same. You would be running LibreOffice on the remote
computer.
Dropbox is not the same.
2013/11/12 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote
Den 12.11.2013 16:47, skreiv jomali:
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
I am using Dropbox for that purposes. It is free up to a few Gb of
storage.
LogMeIn is not the same. You would be running LibreOffice on the
Den 12.11.2013 19:21, skreiv Pedro:
Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote
Den 12.11.2013 16:47, skreiv jomali:
Can't you use LogMeIn.com to do what you want?
I am using Dropbox for that purposes. It is free up to a few Gb of
storage.
LogMeIn is not the same. You would be running LibreOffice on the remote
run a portable version (e.g. X-LibreOffice) from your own pen (it
only needs
some 400Mb)
Running LibreOffice from a Web Server would be fantastic...
Yes, I agree.
Kolbjoern
https://www.rollapp.com/search?query=libreoffice
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On 11/12/13 5:51 AM, Paul wrote:
I think there's a dangerous perception here: The perception that the LO
developers work on nothing except what they want to work on.
I'm pretty sure that that is very false. They work on LO because they
want to work on LO, and they probably choose what to work
On 11/12/2013 2:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Here's the fault with this logic.
I'm going to up the number of people for bug B just for illustrating
my point.
50 people have issues with bug A. 5 people have issues with bug B.
Extrapolate... 5 people with bug C, 5 with D, all the way though
On 11/12/13 8:50 AM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of bugs/issues. I
wanted to contribute in the area of reporting issues, but I don't have
the knowledge to fix them. I didn't expect those problems to go to
Hi Gabriel
Gabriel Risterucci wrote
For the record, the provided wiki page reference the broadway backend of
GTK, which mean that the software is actually running on the server, and
only displayed in the browser. It's not different that what you'd achieve
with logmein or X forwarding or VNC
2013/11/12 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Hi Gabriel
Gabriel Risterucci wrote
For the record, the provided wiki page reference the broadway backend of
GTK, which mean that the software is actually running on the server, and
only displayed in the browser. It's not different that what you'd
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:02:08 -0700
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
Changes are one animal, fixes are another.
Sometimes (often?) a fix entails a change...
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:25 -0700
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
What told me I was being ignored, and essentially my issues were not
critical, is the fact they were never assigned to anyone for fixing,
and labeled as such.
So you're upset because your issues were not considered
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:25 -0700
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
Maybe there should be a queue, and fixed on a FIFO basis.
That would be a terrible idea, at least without some prioritisation.
Otherwise you'd have periods of just catching up on myriad small bugs
while big issues languish.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
First, it's not *my* bug. The bug is the software. The software is
not mine.
Well said, and very true.
Third, there is nothing forcing him to work on anything but what he
wants to is exactly the problem IMO.
Sure, but it
Hi Paul
Paul-6 wrote
Third, there is nothing forcing him to work on anything but what he
wants to is exactly the problem IMO.
Sure, but it is a problem with no solution. Unless you have blackmail
material, or bribery material (such as, say, a salary), there is very
little you can do to
snowshed wrote
Maybe there should be a queue, and fixed on a FIFO basis. Are either of
my posted bugs, or the ones that I listed in another post debilitating?
No. Would I expect mine to be fixed before X number of debilitating
bugs? Not in a million years. But they need to be fixed
On 11/12/13 4:45 PM, Pedro wrote:
Hi Paul
Paul-6 wrote
Third, there is nothing forcing him to work on anything but what he
wants to is exactly the problem IMO.
Sure, but it is a problem with no solution. Unless you have blackmail
material, or bribery material (such as, say, a salary), there
Hi,
I want to have an lexical index. Mine is a somewhat particular as, in
general, one keyword refers to one place in the book (one sentence, one
chapter). So, instead of having only Keyword Tab page number, I'd like
that Keyword or page number to be an hyperlink, such as it is with a
table
On 11/12/13 3:24 PM, Paul wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:44:50 -0700
John Meyer johnme...@pueblocomputing.com wrote:
On 11/12/2013 2:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Here's the fault with this logic.
I'm going to up the number of people for bug B just for
illustrating my point.
50 people have
On 11/12/13 4:35 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/12/2013 3:02 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/12/13 8:50 AM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of
bugs/issues. I
wanted to contribute in the area of reporting issues,
On 11/12/2013 6:24 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/12/13 4:35 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/12/2013 3:02 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/12/13 8:50 AM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of
bugs/issues. I
wanted to
On 11/12/13 6:35 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/12/2013 6:24 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/12/13 4:35 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/12/2013 3:02 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/12/13 8:50 AM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed
I have libreoffice installed on a mac with os x 10.8. If I prepare a
presentation and put it on a flash drive, will it play on a windows computer.
I don't have the right adapter to connect to a digital projector, and need to
use a windows laptop.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On 11/12/2013 08:08 PM, June Newman wrote:
I have libreoffice installed on a mac with os x 10.8. If I prepare a
presentation and put it on a flash drive, will it play on a windows computer.
I don't have the right adapter to connect to a digital projector, and need to
use a windows laptop.
Sadly, I believe that it is not possible to do this directly.
The following link discusses this:
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=1227
On 11/12/2013 05:12 PM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
Hi,
I want to have an lexical index. Mine is a somewhat particular as, in
62 matches
Mail list logo
