Ah, of course. One might find one thing incredible valuable, and another would not.On 12/1/05, Digital Buddha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If financial worth is equal to audience interest and that interest is subjective, is financial worth then subjective?On 12/1/05,
Devlon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And both determination of value can be objective to the different make
up of those individuals.
-- Enric
http://www.cirne.com
Determine the Media
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, of course. One might find one thing incredible valuable, and
And those in control of the make up of an individual's make up
(nature, nurture take your pick) are in control of the determination
of value.
And those with money and power may play a big role in one's make up,
so they can feed thier own value.
On 12/2/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And
Ok, it's late...that first part didn't make sense, but you know what I mean.
On 12/2/05, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And those in control of the make up of an individual's make up
(nature, nurture take your pick) are in control of the determination
of value.
And those with money and
The number of factors, complexity and randomness of human
characteristics make it currently unlikely to precisely calculate
worth for a large population. Another factor is that human beings are
volitional and self-determined, therefore self-creating. So future
predictions are likely to fail.
Don't tell advertisers that ;)On 12/2/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The number of factors, complexity and randomness of human
characteristics make it currently unlikely to precisely calculate
worth for a large population. Another factor is that human beings are
volitional and
The smart ones know it and adjust to constant change ;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't tell advertisers that ;)
On 12/2/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The number of factors, complexity and randomness of human
characteristics make it
Friday, December 2, 2005, 6:00:56 AM, Eric wrote:
I'm a nazi and pushing those who view my vlog to update to Quicktime 7
and apply the fix with the plugins, I really like the new h264 codec,
its very good.
Don't forget that VLC ( http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ ) will play h264.
It sometimes has
Friday, December 2, 2005, 6:42:08 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
My suggestion on the porn:
Have a ratings system, so that everyone who submits a feed has to tag it
rated G rated X or whatever.
If a feed is rated X, replace any thumbnails with Adult Content or some
such in a graphic.
If
yes it is part of life... but much of this discussion is related to kids
encountering this stuff.
I like to use this illustration in that regard.
http://www.missionarypositionsmovie.com/kiddyspam.jpg
People find it irresponsible to create a picture like this, but then support
who the
On 12/2/05, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it would work leaving the categorizing to the submitter.I can imagine plenty of reasons why someone might (deliberately oraccidentally) mis-categorize something.
Yes, of course, but... I don't think that any of the sites which
if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing
one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? if
im wearing a nike shirt does that make my video a tm issue?? if i do a video
blog in my car and the radio has a song on is that a copy rite
Well I certainly agree that people should be allowed to put whatever content they so choose on their web site, filtered or not. My issue is with this spreading conventional wisdom that seems to state that we all have some inherent, deep, and fundamental responsiblity to sanitize what we can and
On 12/2/05, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing
one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? No, although depending on your characterization if it as crap it may be slander or
http://video.spreadfirefox.com/advertcontest/index.php
Enjoy
Loiez
http://www.loiez.org
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
we should have an authority to rate a vlog. just like netiba
On 12/2/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/05, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it would work leaving the categorizing to the submitter.
I can imagine plenty of reasons why someone might
On 12/2/05, Wong Teck Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we should have an authority to rate a vlog. just like netiba
I've never heard of NetIBA before (just looked it up), which may or may
not prove anything. But, for a business with money behind it, there is
incentive to pay for something like
Yeah there are a few options for this. There are some products that
are camera mounted direct to disk hard drives. They're kind of
expensive, at least the ones I've seen at BH photo. There is a budget
way of doing this. You can capture direct to a laptop HD via firewire.
I don't know what
someone said this site:
http://www.toodou.com/index.html
was a user-generated video site.
anyone know chinese?
fact checking.
jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
URL: http://www.momentshowing.net
http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing
http://getFireAnt.com
Yahoo!
perhaps someone's willing to do sth like vlog-monitor?
On 12/2/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/2/05, Wong Teck Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we should have an authority to rate a vlog. just like netiba
I've never heard of NetIBA before (just looked it up), which may or
Bill's suggestion is a good one. Just to add, you can capture with QT
Pro 7 as well -- unsure if it works on Windows.
On 12/2/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah there are a few options for this. There are some products that
are camera mounted direct to disk hard drives. They're
Interestingly I've had this problem more with Win Media than
Quicktime. But then again I'm usually using a Mac. I'm guessing your
experience is with Quicktime on Windows? I've not experienced this
problem with QT on windows but I have had it with both VLC and Win
Media Player.
Bill Streeter
it's kinda famous in china..
it's for both vlog and podcast
it's only have 100mb with p2p transfer
On 12/2/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
someone said this site:
http://www.toodou.com/index.html
was a user-generated video site.
anyone know chinese?
fact checking.
jay
--
Sorry I meant to say below that I'm not aware of how to do this on a
PC, I obviously know how to do it on a Mac,
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah there are a few options for this. There are some
all you need to do (on a mac atleast) with FCP is go into your capture settings, within log and capture, and change device control to "non-controllable" device. this avoids final cut looking for timecode from a tape. "capture now" begins loading material live to you're hard drive. which is
Firefox Boycott!!Embargo on!On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:35 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote: thats right, the vlogtron exists. hey chuck... wheres chuck? he's the head.On 12/2/05, Brad Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:are we forming voltron (or would that be vlogtron..)??! I didn't get the memo :/I've had
Wish there was a way you could get QT Pro7 on disk from a store.
But I guess all that would be would be a wish..cuz it ain't happenin'.
(and if they do sell it at an apple store..that must be nice but WE
don't have an apple store in my area)-
-- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe
it's kinda famous in china..
it's for both vlog and podcast
it's only have 100mb with p2p transfer
cool!
so can you give any background--
how long has it been up?
do many people post?
what kinds of work are people posting?
is podcasting and videoblogging well known inside china?
Jay
--
any free software?
On 12/2/05, Crystal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wish there was a way you could get QT Pro7 on disk from a store.
But I guess all that would be would be a wish..cuz it ain't happenin'.
(and if they do sell it at an apple store..that must be nice but WE
don't have an apple
well, lets assume its a bug and we need a vlog horde to report it.its def fine on windows... so as others said, looks to be just mac related. On 12/2/05,
Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firefox Boycott!!Embargo on!On Dec 2, 2005, at 12:35 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote: thats right,
background:toodou has been up since april of 2005currently its members have reach -unknown-anyway, they have more than 13,000 channels now and increasing rapidly for both memebrs and channelseveryone can be members, Everyone can be director is the slogan they're using to promote their
Hi all,
so I implemented a fix (it's not live yet, but will be next week).
Here are some screenshots:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69373519/
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69373437/
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69373386
What it does is put a 'parental
I just watched "Episode #8 - Windows Version" on my
Mac (by mistake). These shows have both windows and iPod versions.
They have professional looking graphics. They seem to have access to some
of the rock stars.
Are these productions of entertainment want-to-be's
? Or are they slick
petertheman wrote:
Hey Jay,
yes, I noticed it as well. It was inevitable, I am actually surprised
it took this long..
Any comments?
Well, it's sad, but as a directory, I suppose it's something you have to
deal with. Some ideas...
I wouldn't go with G, PG, X type ratings... As mentioned,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
so I implemented a fix (it's not live yet, but will be next week).
Here are some screenshots:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69373519/
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69373437/
I have to say I feel concerned about the free distribution of adult
and violent videos by individuals, versus the law-abiding, lawyer-
retaining mainstream producers who have to keep on file documents
regarding the actor's age, animal welfare, explosives permits, etc.
So my question is; How
Brad Webb wrote:
are we forming voltron (or would that be vlogtron..)??! I didn't get the
memo :/
I've had perpetual issues with any vid + firefox when scrolling for
awhile.. window blacks out, etc etc. I've kinda learned to not touch my
browser when viewing :)
Yeah, I have somewhat
I've added some code to Mefeedia to check for bad internet archive
URLs and provide fixes for the vloggers. It'll be out next week,
here's a screenshot of a feeds details page:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69379495/
and
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/69379752/
(Michael,
What about the text descriptions?
The text descriptions are still there.. the idea isn't to remove any
porn feeds... it's to make it less offensive to browse mefeedia. I
don't want to censor anything at this point.
Peter
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
" On 12/2/05,
Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it
would work leaving the categorizing to the submitter. I can imagine
plenty of reasons why someone might (deliberately or accidentally)
mis-categorize something."
I suspect we are going to
soon have questions of
Tomorrow at 10am(PST), I will be talking with radio personality Chris
Goldstein on Active Voice Radio about Video Blogging.
Active Voice Radio
www.activevoiceradio.com
The 45 minute show will also be broadcast at
6:30PM on 90.7FM KSFR Santa Fe Public Radio
www.ksfr.org
The podcast URL will
I wouldn't go with G, PG, X type ratings... As mentioned, 'adult'
doesn't always mean X, etc. Perhaps following the iTunes model of
marking things as 'mature' or 'explicit' or whatever might work.
For people not logged in, I would filter out all 'mature' content. For
people who are
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:25:09 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
or traditional companies will start making feeds with bascially
advertisements.
youll have literally hundreds of feeds because every business must have
a voice.
Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
How will i
Art, community,activism,
Loiez
Le 2 déc. 05 à 16:48, Jack Olmsted a écrit :
What else should be on the list?
-Jack
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
Share is a member of this group.
Why don't you ask her directly?
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
I just watched "Episode #8 - Windows
Version" on my Mac (by mistake). These shows have both windows and
iPod versions. They have professional looking graphics. They seem to
have access
Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
im not making a judgement on the products...i just dont want my time
hijacked by watching commercials.
jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
URL: http://www.momentshowing.net
http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing
http://getFireAnt.com
petertheman wrote:
What it does is put a 'parental advisory thumbnail on feeds that we
have flagged as porn (it is surprisingly easy to catch most porn feeds
and flag them manually). If you subscribe to this feed or queue its
videos, you get the real thumbnails.
Of course this is just my
thanks... and yeah I agree - censoring is prob the wrong way to go. be more innovative and yes, proactive, and prob have better success.if its easy to find the content geared for children, then the chances of them browsing the directory and seeing adult content is greatly reduced, generally
hmm.. and its sorta like a video rental store in that way ;)On 12/2/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:thanks... and yeah I agree - censoring is prob the wrong way to go. be more innovative and yes, proactive, and prob have better success.
if its easy to find the content geared for
Happy Friday everyone,
Just saw a link in my referrer log from Yahoo!
It lead me to the Yahoo! Video Search results page for a search for
'vlog'
http://tinyurl.com/d56m7
or
http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?_adv_prop=videoa
mp;x=opei=UTF-8va=vlogfmt=mpegfmt=qt
;sz=alldur=allvst=0vm=p
petertheman wrote:
know that I'm sometimes not even sure if I should want videos in
FireANT
when my kids are in the room.
Yep. It's a complex issue. I just want to make sure we provide
solutions that scale and that work, but don't censor. There is enough
censorship out there.
Agreed. I'm
Its very simple to report the bug:Just navigate to your site (or a site in question with a QT embed object).Pull down the "help" menu from Firefox.Select "Report a broken Website"And fill out the simple form.On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote: well, lets assume its a bug and
Jay dedman wrote:
Maybe the opposite approach would be logical?
Instead of filtering the not for kids stuff, filter the kid friendly
stuff.
And include a warning on site stating that there may be adult content
within, but check out our kid-friendly zone here
You can then have
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:20:18 +0100, Steve Garfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interesting thing is that the Yahoo! results page allows you to
play my video directly AND it uses frames to display the original
source page.
Very similar to Google's image search. I really like this approach.
It is interesting. I guess our ears listen to
the language we understand while buffering out the language we don't.
Actually, this is better than not being to understand what someone is
saying. Nevertheless, the other language bouncing around in the background
is somewhat annoying.
What
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael, vlogdirty is really a great name! If only I were a
pornographer...:)
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
Videographer, Writer, Activist
Advisor: The Immortality Institute
Hoboken, NJ
i think this is ridiculous, personally.On 12/2/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is interesting. I guess our ears listen to
the language we understand while buffering out the language we don't.
Actually, this is better than not being to understand what someone is
Of course it will. In the same way that the kids section of Blockbuster interests parents. There seems to be this view in our culture lately that kids are like little grownups and they just go and do whatever they want and so society has to protect them. That perspective is...not even
Is there a correlation between a child going to a peep show and
turning into a thief later? Don't laws already prohibit adult
establishments from allowing minors in? Aren't they already zoned in
cities? Should those laws be eliminated because they restrict the
choices and/or availablity of
the kid can also google porn and BOOYA!!of course some kids may be a little too curious too soon...but we should discuss the issue broadly and generalize, knowing that their are always exceptions.no solution will ever be perfect.
On 12/2/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
ok i don't know if this is fixed
i viewed the source of this feed
http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnTheRoadToRuin
and i don't see that video as an enclosure
will the next post be correct?
i've never had this problem with feedburner before
having to choose itunes catagories for enclosures to be
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the kid can also google porn and BOOYA!!
of course some kids may be a little too curious too soon...
but we should discuss the issue broadly and generalize, knowing that
their
are always exceptions.
no solution
Not that this thread hasn't run it's course, but I do like one suggestion that was made, and I sincerely hope that Peter takes it into serious consideration. The suggestion was to "safe filter" by default, much the way Google does for image searches. Considering how "public" (both figuratively
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:10:10 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
im not making a judgement on the products...i just dont want my time
hijacked by watching commercials.
Thinking that companies will push out feeds of the 30 second commercials
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:10:10 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
im not making a judgement on the products...i just dont want my time
hijacked by
My buddy Bill Streeter pointed out that my name was evoked in the
middle of this thread, therefore, I would like to offer a few
observations/comments
1) Would Rocketboom do as well with an equally beautiful woman who was
not as clever, smart, and funny as Amanda - I seriously doubt it
2)
"if i do a video
blog in my car and the radio has a song on is that a copy rite
isue??"
Actually, you violate copyright when you
have a song playing on the radio in your car while doing a vlog. You violate
copyright when you film in a bar and an annoying bothersome boombox is playing
in
For me it's the thin edge of the wedge, and I think folks are focusing
more on oh no! it's porn! -- where's the line drawn? How long until
there's spvlogs, etc. Having a system in place to filter down -- not out
-- things that negatively impact the community and tools aren't a bad
thing, imho.
Gosh, Jay, can't you read!! :)
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality
InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280
- Original Message -
From:
Jay
dedman
To: Videobloggers
Sent: Friday,
I agree.
All I can do in this world is protect my own kids. I make the rules. So when I
populate
FireANT, I'm putting in the things like the kidsafe feed (which could be
abused--but that's
what parenting entails)
I also have a client that has TA in their video podcast. Mine is not to
Randolfe, why are you so intolerant? You have not seen the movie yet you judge
it is sour
puss evangelism VH-1 watched the movie and they thought it was funny enough
to
order a pilot for a reality series.
check out the movie site
http://www.missionarypositionsmovie.com
and tell me
Last year I was a projectionist at the Cinequest Film Festival in the University Theatre . A rucuous group of poeple came in, yelling, shouting, joking and having fun. Then they showed the film, "Missionary Positions" which I thought was well done and honest. I don't agree that porn is "bad" or
50k users
700k hits /day
podcasts and video
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
it's kinda famous in china..
it's for both vlog and podcast
it's only have 100mb with p2p transfer
cool!
so can you give any background--
how long has it been up?
do many people post?
what
please disregard previous message, intended to send off list.
cheers
Begin forwarded message:
From: robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: December 2, 2005 10:11:08 AM EST
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] chinese ourmedia?
50k users
700k hits /day
podcasts
I need to learn how to speak about my feelings of commercialization in
the media.
it never quite comes out right.
nothing wrong with busness and profit and money...
what is wrong is the amount of negative influence, explotation, and
lack of respect for the community for which a company lives in.
companies in the US have a very bad reputation for making content that
is authentic or useful.
let me rephrase.
companies in the US have a very bad reputation for making content that
is not authentic or useful.
usually they add their image/concept content
to popular entertainment.
I must
This discussion about labeling reminds me of
C-Span's coverage of a report on video games. They have a system with
terms to describe games not for those under eighteen, excessive violence,
etc. But, they find that most retailers (Best Buy being the lone
exception) sell these games rated
In 30 '
A booking has been made for 02-Dec-05 at 20:00 (GMT +) and
lasting 89 minutes.
This booking is for 25 people to use the application FlashMeeting
To enter this event directly use the following address:
http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/index.php?pwd=0f4150-2580
Loiez
Jay says and Andreas responded:
anyone with a brian knows that insanefilms.com is not a porn
vloghe just happened to film a gang bang audition once for a
school project. (look in the archive. its pretty amazing)
They have... auditions...?
This is an interesting point. Say what you want
It's a good idea, but requires more coding than I can muster right
now.. Will probably implement this in January..
Peter
Not that this thread hasn't run it's course, but I do like one
suggestion that was made, and I sincerely hope that Peter takes it
into serious consideration. The
I don't recognize the name "share".
What comes to mind is whether there is a directory
to the names and email addresses of members of this group listed
somewhere?
I know you can get the email address by clicking
the name and "properties" on a posting but is there a directory or listing
Through the group yahoo website, you can see a list of members. You
cant see their full email addresses but you can contact them through
the yahoo system. To have a list that included full emails could be
downloaded or cutpasted, would be a bad idea because it would be wide
open to spam abuse.
sorry all this underneath rant was basically aimed at comments during the day, it bares nothing to the thread attached.On 2 Dec 2005, at 19:34, Paul Knight wrote: Hi randy and enric,Although I understand that both of you have probably non-issues with pornography, check out this please before you
In the podcast from the Blogher session Blogging for Business,
Christine Halvorson of Stonyfield Yogurt talks about how the president
of the company insisted on creating a company blog even though the
marketing department was in the beginning opposed to it:
Blogher related site
All commercial blogs/vlogs are not evil. What
amuses me is when a viewer watches a commercial vlog and doesn't even realize
it.
There was a "Wild Girls of Thailand" vlog a few
days ago with some topless nudity, etc. and which ended with a still that said:
"Get the DVD @ ". Actually,
New version of ffmpegx came out the other day that apparently supports
ipod h264, Im just giving it a try now. Its probably a bit too nerdy
for some, hopefully iSquint will be able to learn the h264 ipod
secrets used in this ffmpegX, and also add ipod 264 support.
ffmpegx:
ryanne hodson wrote:
ok i don't know if this is fixed
i viewed the source of this feed
http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnTheRoadToRuin
and i don't see that video as an enclosure
will the next post be correct?
Well, the feed is valid now.
But there are no enclosures it in.
How about adding
LOL, quite obviously...
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
sorry all this underneath rant was basically aimed at comments during
the day, it bares nothing to the thread attached.
On 2 Dec 2005, at 19:34, Paul Knight wrote:
Hi randy
Ive been using it and its AMAZING how small in file size H.264s are
compared to Mpeg and 3ivx.
They render really fast too.
H264 will take over quickly, I think, because its that much better.
On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Steve Watkins wrote:
New version of ffmpegx came out the other day that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive been using it and its AMAZING how small in file size H.264s are
compared to Mpeg and 3ivx.
They render really fast too.
H264 will take over quickly, I think, because its that much better.
To all:
They render really fast too.
My experience is that, tho I think the H264 looks better at smaller
sizes, it's slow as dirt to encode. At least with QT... haven't tried
any other encoders.
cheers,
On 12/2/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive been using it and its AMAZING how
I scrolled through the Yahoo Vlog search
results.
How do they find that content? A lot of well
known vloggers weren't represented at all. There was a vlogger named
"dooser" who seemed to have one to three vlogs on nearly every
page.
I noticed a lot of the files were very small.
I
I think they scrape a site called vlogdigest (or something like that:)
On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Randolfe Wicker wrote:
I wonder if you know how these search engines work?
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:07:30 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do they find that content? A lot of well known vloggers weren't
represented at all. There was a vlogger named dooser who seemed to
have one to three vlogs on nearly every page.
I noticed a lot of the
Actually, all of their video search is (supposedly) powered/driven by
Media RSS. I.e. no media-rss extension, no inclusion in their search.
That's my understanding, at least (I was part of the group that defined
it..)
robert a/k/a r wrote:
I think they scrape a site called vlogdigest (or
Hey that's really strange! I fixed those a long time ago. If you
check out the posts on my site they have the correct links now. Do
they show up like this in Mefeedia because that's how they were
originally when they went out in my RSS feed?
-Verdi
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:46 AM, petertheman
Something that is never mentioned in all this talk
about "kids and adult content" is that if they are "too young", they won't find
it interesting. If they find it interesting, they are probably old enough
to be viewing it.
That was what was really wacky about that JPEG with
two kids
I've written before about this. I think we may be using the wrong
metric for mobile video with the coming of H.264. My theory is that
file size is no longer supreme. H.264 takes more processing power to
decode. And processing power generally means less battery life
(although this can be
Yes there is a members database at the group page on Yahoo Groups.
Also Share has posted here several times in the last couple of
weeks. I'm surprised you didn't see the messages.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL
Its a combination of factors. H264 is more demanding to encode and
decode, but also Apple have not made the best job of it. There are
faster h264 encoders than quicktime, and if you can live with
single-pass rather than dualpass, it helps.
Andrew's experience is due to the encoder used by ffmpegx
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
