Re: [videoblogging] flash h264 3D test

naddahiccup On 8/27/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ive been messing around with papervision3d stuff for flash. > > This rather pointless demo will only run if you have the flash beta > player installed, as the video is a h264, and it will probably use too > much cpu: > > http:/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Jason Calacanis thinks you'll love Mahalo Follow

automation does not equal spam. it may be less than desirable, but it aint spam. at least not this time. sull On 8/27/07, Andrew Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Exactly. Kinda sad to see that they have resorted to this to try and > get people to the site. > > > On

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Chris Brogan has invited you to Spock

a bug maybe? i think the idea is decent. have not explored the service as of yet though. its taking "google me", and using that emphasis to drive their service. makes sense. On 8/24/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm curious, my immediate reaction was to slam Spock on twitter

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Unrealistic Expectations Of Social Media

> > So, you can understand the touchiness they might have when it comes to > race > issues. whats wrong with touchiness? do you think a proper debate is some sort of risky affair down there in that "black college"? On 8/24/07, Robert Scoble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ConvergeSouth is hel

Re: [videoblogging] Fwd: Chris Brogan has invited you to Spock

it is obviously deliberate by the user. Ideally, an openID type of service for our address books would prob work. and may already exist. ?? Sull On 8/24/07, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now I've never (I don't think) been Broganized in this manner, but to be

Re: [videoblogging] CBS buys Wallstrip

http://mediapredict.com/ On 5/22/07, Jim Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So group, who do YOU predict will be the next small TV show to be bought > by a large media company? > > http://urltea.com/lue > > I'd love to hear your predictions! > > Jim, > > http://www.vergenewmedia.com > > ___

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

put out there that you can let go of. sull On 5/17/07, Frank Sinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doesn't have to be one or the other. Just trying to see what people > think the value of a YouTube viewer or subscriber is versus someone > who has viewed and subscribed

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Citizendium vs. Wikipedia

ction for both the user and the service, ie. > > wikipedia. > > > > Anyway... I just heard abut citizendium today... who knows if it will > > go anywhere at all.. . but these are all experiments in better > > collaboration and self governance. As such they are all impo

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Threats and male vloggers

playing by the rules verses playing the rules. a fine line that some enjoy treading. On 5/3/07, Charles Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Crossing a line? There are 1 articles on Wikipedia with unsourced > statements, and you've spent the last year obsessively purging a single > one of the

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Markus, Meet Pat and his condo. http://mirror21.video.blip.tv/RenovatingMichael-EpisodeSixPatsCondo951.mov On 5/3/07, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HI Patrick, > > When I saw your initial post, I thought "why is he posting in the wrong > thread?" and then I looked more carefully

[videoblogging] Citizendium vs. Wikipedia

Citizendium. Here is one of the drafts: http://zero.newassignment.net/filed/weve_got_draft Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] will law - vloggercon 2006.

besides using a 3rd party services flash wrapper, you would need to run/utilize a flash server engine yourself (flash media server, wowza etc) correct me if i am wrong. On 4/29/07, mark_raheja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > couldn't easily track down will law's contact details, so i figure > i'

Re: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

like i said, i dont have time for wikipedia bullshit. wikipedia obviously has value but i, and many others, can do no better than to clash with the archaic rules and the hyper-editors. On 5/1/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sull, > > It may seem discour

Re: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

project between Wired.com and NewAssignment.net. http://zero.newassignment.net/assignmentzero/crowdfunding Who needs wikipedia! ;) Sull On 5/1/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sull, > > It may seem discouraging to have your content deleted but I'

Re: [videoblogging] A game changer?

e drm features, to me, are a side note. sull On 5/1/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the game changing will be in the continual and vast usage of the flv > format which wont just be for "online" video playback. > > On 5/1/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [videoblogging] A game changer?

> and far between. > > This simply sounds like anotehr B.S. attempt at DRM. > > To create a downloadable proprietary format and player that will work > on thousands of pieces of hardware is a pipe dream... it's a > contradiction in itself. Adobe should stick to problems it c

Re: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

FUCK (you missed one ;) On 5/1/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is so maddening. If this is really the way it works I'd rather > request that all articles about videoblogging be removed. To have to > wait for traditional media to call us up and misquote us so that the > > fucke

Re: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

that user was also responsible for the deletion of my article 'Crowdfunding'. and yes, meiser has been battling for months. fucking wikipedia. i dont have the time nor patience for such games. On 4/29/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This user - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User

[videoblogging] Fwd: Video Podcasting Comes of Age with ON Networks

-- Forwarded message -- From: Read/WriteWeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 24, 2007 12:09 AM Subject: Video Podcasting Comes of Age with ON Networks To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valleywag recently declaredpo

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Scripting News: 4/18/2007

Any enabling technology that exists -for the people- will ultimately expose such sick people. Utterly unavoidable. Reputations of technology do not exist. People who use technology are not defamed. Sull On 4/20/07, Justin Kownacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The real problem is

[videoblogging] Fwd: While Web 2.0 happens, I observe day laborers

An Eric Rice request. http://www.ericrice.com/blog/?p=476 -- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 17, 2007 9:09 PM Subject: While Web 2.0 happens, I observe day laborers To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In my rural Silicon Valley town, there are day laborers

[videoblogging] OurMedia Updated

I noticed one of my VBW07 videos was getting hit on via ourmedia... a surprise. An even better surprise is that the site UI has been updated for the first time since we launched this beast at the first vloggercon. Take a look. http://ourmedia.org Nice work... and please keep going :) Sull

[videoblogging] CBS on Joost

http://www.joost.com/blog/2007/04/cbs-has-its-eye-on-joost.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Is "LIVE!" The Next Frontier?

exactly. the strength of livecasting can really shine for citizen jounalistic coverage take for instance todays devastating news out of Virginia. On 4/16/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, somehow i forgot to add the sentence that indicated the irony > of me writing that while

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

multiple playlists. so you could them for any purpose you can think of. of course, there are other ways it can be done and I am sure blip will explore them all. send them feedback on their mailing list. sull On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I can tell,

Re: [videoblogging] A game changer?

Game Changer? - Yes. On 4/16/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check this out, interesting article > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070416/tc_nm/adobe_player_dc;_ylt=AqF8l.m > rZ2KqopCFainOFEjMWM0F > > SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Adobe Systems Inc. unveiled on Sunday video- > player softwar

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

the web. Its been around a long long time and nobody really ever talks about it. It is commonly used for mobile phone networks however. I just think it can be brought into the limelight and be used creatively again and now with Flash as the wrapper instead of Quicktime or Real. Sull On 4/15/0

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

Josh- Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to tackle? ( > i.e. key/value pairs) Can you ellaborate here? Because it sounds similar to some of my efforts. Thnx, sull On 4/15/07, joshpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, metadata is key. Th

Re: [videoblogging] Re: pyro.tv transcoding and rehosting your stuff

quot; perspective. Keep in mind, few services openly offer flv format like blip does. If more did so, then we would probably see less rehosting of the flash format. Sull On 4/14/07, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They seem to be giving attribution and providing direct

Re: [videoblogging] Re: pyro.tv transcoding and rehosting your stuff

: http://www.pyro.tv/media/4/sharedmedia/6/40/10/5075_416572.mp4.flv Sull On 4/14/07, ryanne hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i'm referring them to the vertigo aggregator best practices > > http://videovertigo.org/information/aggregation/ > > though i'm not s

[videoblogging] Tangler Launches

Hey all... Might be interested in this. http://www.tangler.com/ Just opened up to public. Sull [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Is "LIVE!" The Next Frontier?

Quality is certainly important and a factor. Though I still have fun with a Pixelvision camera ;) sull On 4/13/07, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It will be absolutely HUGE for live audio-visual, performance and net > artists one the image quality is t

Re: [videoblogging] Is "LIVE!" The Next Frontier?

a fat camera on the hat like that. Oh yeah, its all kind of freaky too ;) sull On 4/13/07, Ryan Ozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Steve Garfield experimented with live vlogging with his Nokia phone > earlier > this month. Justin Kan of Justin.TV is walking around San Francisco w

Re: [videoblogging] Tilzy.tv Launch!

nice work guys. On 4/11/07, jamisonmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Videobloggers, > > We just launched Tilzy.tv , a guide to > entertainment on the web that includes editorial overviews and short > preview clips from websites with amassed entertainment content. Our >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hyperlinks in Video

would be splendicious ;) sull On 4/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm still hoping vPIP from Enric keeps evolving... there should be a > way to make put a "wrapper" such as SMIL around pretty much any video > file... or use flash to wrap f

Re: [videoblogging] Voting through watching videos

nice. just saved me a lot of time ;) On 4/6/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a smart way to use video: > http://www.expertvoter.org/ > > They've just organized all the candidates...and listed videos they've > made based on topic. > So see what Clinton, Obama, McCainfeel

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: podPress Project has been ended.

geeks On 4/4/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just for the record in case anybody fell for this and hasnt revisited > the podpress site, it was an April fool. > > Cheers > > Steve Elbows > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , > "tom_a_sparks" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I've got 2 Joost invites... anybody want one?

i have 5. On 4/4/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's more invites to be had now if you are still interested. > > Cheers > > Steve Elbows > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , > Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If anyone out there has an invite, I'd love on

Re: [videoblogging] Dreamhost vs blip.tv?

ving to provide more services to media makers and will eventually resemble services like blip.tv. Dreamhost is taking small steps towards that I think. Likewise, I bet some video centric hosting services will try to broaden their features by becoming more like traditional web hosts. Sull On 4/4/07

Re: [videoblogging]

posts. i think mefeedia allows for that but just cant recall for sure. either way, i am sure they can trick it out for us today. sull On 4/2/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have seen some great things today. Trying to comment as much as > possible, but the volume of vi

Re: [videoblogging] Get Media: an easy way to find cool stuff

Nice! On 3/31/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check out this out: > http://spinxpress.com/getmedia > > Just type in a search term, the license you want, type of media...and > it gives you back permalinks from Blip, Archive, Ourmedia, and > Magnatune. > > So if youve ever been tryin

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Twitter & vlogging & Twittervlog!

? I refrain > > from further talk of synchronicity. > > Have you seen Twingly? Same kind of thing, but for blogs and > > 1,000,000x crazier > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgIT-hfgOXY > > > > > > On 29 Mar 2007, at 20:05, sull wrote: > > >

Re: [videoblogging] Youtube / vbweek07

Seriously. Your track record here is less than acceptable in my opinion. Tone it down, relax, think. Or just enjoy your youtube group. sull On 3/30/07, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok... um Pat... settle down > > after reading Ruperts email and your reply to it,

Re: [videoblogging] Twitter & vlogging & Twittervlog!

have you seen http://twittervision.com ? Crazy. On 29 Mar 2007 11:53:54 -0700, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, man! > > This is cool. > > Going to find your Auto-Twitter-Vlog post now... > > Jan > > > On 3/29/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > Today is my 2 year

Re: [videoblogging] Twitter & vlogging & Twittervlog!

category of videobloggingweek2007. that would also give you a merged rss and opml. i'm too busy to even write the few messages i am posting to this group today so i'm out :/ sull On 29 Mar 2007 11:38:22 -0700, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is a good quest

Re: [videoblogging] Twitter & vlogging & Twittervlog!

ic some time in April. sull On 29 Mar 2007 11:15:25 -0700, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Today is my 2 year vlogiversary. I haven't posted nearly enough in > that time, and most of my old stuff is offline. > > I've always wanted to post more inconsequentia

Re: [videoblogging] Re: A question about viewership habits....

right. a more polished approach akin to some traditional talk shows would be nice to see. i thought thats what http://latenitemash.com was going to be or maybe it is (I havent followed it). JD Lasica also has a good project that is somewhat relevant- http://www.realpeoplenetwork.com/ sull On

Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging week... what's your idea?

Bring Your Own Theme On 26 Mar 2007 06:46:44 -0700, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know some people are coming up with ideas for what they are going to > do for videoblogging week... I mistakenly crammed for mine all > weekend, thinking it started yesterday (oops) but at least I have a

Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV

also noteworthy via Zadi: http://zadidiaz.com/blog/2007/03/jetset_on_appletv.html sull On 3/26/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm getting more interested since my friend blogged this point > > <http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/quicktime-gai

Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV

I'm getting more interested since my friend blogged this point < http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/quicktime-gains-720p-apple-tv-high.html > other links he blogged, of interest... < http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/macworld-video-macworld-video-exploring.html > On 3/25/07, Tim S

Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update

I know. The theme should be "Organized Chaos". Isn't that what has happened in this space? On 3/24/07, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 > > I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps > other > people so

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Let's Help The Others, As We Used To, To Vlog

r its failing as expected. but one night i just tossed up a new group and called it ambiguously... ForThoseOfUs <http://forthoseof.us>. wtf is it? not sure. likely nothing at all. sull On 25 Mar 2007 09:50:04 -0700, ryanne hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i think the el

Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update

remise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [videoblogging] BikiniZero.com Tech News Bikini-Driven!

very creative design/production! On 22 Mar 2007 18:23:41 -0700, filmanimationweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Gang, > Just wanted to post the link to our first episode of our weekly tech > show. We also have a contest for the best tech story of the month, so > enter to win a video ipod.. >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Clipser.com

discourage the back and forth tech related issues of that site. Feel free to discuss the concept of 'redeeming virtual dollars earned if viral video clip sharing site gets bought out'. As little as that has to do with videoblogging I know it bleeds in. Sull On 22 Mar 2007 13:3

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Clipser.com

OK. This discussion, especially for technical support etc... can be taken offlist please. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] justin.tv

wifi? > --how many live streams could they possibly handle? > > jay > > -- > Here I am > http://jaydedman.com > > Check out the latest project: > http://pixelodeonfest.com/ > Webvideo festival this June > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) ht

Re: [videoblogging] New words for the vlogging world??

have many labels for themselves since many will tend to always be applicable. i dont think those who make video to communicate... for messaging or video conversations consider themselves filmmakers though. sull On 3/15/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we'r

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

g under the sun and > > essentially ignoring requests of the original content creators to > > remove their materials from their site. It's the exact same >argument > > that's been brought up here over and over about sites being able to > > aggregate our content sans repercussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

totally. being a huge mets fan doesnt help my situation and MLB.com wont let me watch mets since i live in NY... I am blacked out. But I could watch other baseball teams if i wanted to pay up. But yeah, Sports IS keeping TV relevant. sull On 13 Mar 2007 09:43:17 -0700, Adam Quirk, Wreck

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

video (ideal for mobile device distribs) or controlled within the VOD environment like Joost... which display pre,mid,post sponsor bumps (eventually i assume you would see full video commercials). sull On 3/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If the viewers are th

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

t > >> for comment. > >> > >> Other media companies have also clashed with YouTube over copyrights, > >> but some, including CBS Corp. and General Electric Co.'s NBC > >> Universal, have reached deals with the video-sharing site to license > >&g

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

. And not as 320x240 youtube encodes. sull On 13 Mar 2007 09:01:23 -0700, Shawn Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe if networks like MTV and Comedy Central put out more then 1 or 2 > interesting shows instead of some of the crap they are trying to pass > off as TV mo

Re: [videoblogging] YouTube sued for 1 billion dollars.....(Insert doctor evil laugh)

with the video revolution that videobloggers have been riding since before YT even started. Sull On 13 Mar 2007 08:09:52 -0700, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I honestly see this as a good thing - Google is just the company that > can > take this type of stupid suing

Re: [videoblogging] Collaboration again

SpinXpress.com website that Verdi, Jay, Eric Zimmerman, > Chris Ritke and others poured their souls in to. We are so excited > about this. You can now browse, find and join cool collaborative > projects on the site. This is a major addition to SpinXpress. > > That's it in a nutshell

Re: [videoblogging] Re: flash video

gging@yahoogroups.com , > "Daryl Urig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > so is the best format for flash video a .swf file or are you talking > a .flv file format? > > > > Daryl > > > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: flash video

inevitable, but figured it would not begin until end of year. this is great to hear! thanks for the update. sull On 3/12/07, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > caroosky wrote: > > Now, if only the portable device manufacturers would get on the ball. > > I'

Re: [videoblogging] Collaboration again

Something I came across recently http://www.cellblock.com sull On 12 Mar 2007 12:01:21 -0700, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The flash meeting chat that Harold highlighted had some interesting > talk about collaboration in it too. > > I guess its a

[videoblogging] tip: macbook pro HOT issue resolved for me

else needed to know there ya go. -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: video Blogging Week 2007

ck) > Health > Farts > Language > > There you go, 7 days worth of fun. Note Sexy falls on hump day. > > On 3/9/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > theme? > > > > maybe theme = > > > > - DISGUST > > > > - INTIMACY > >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: video Blogging Week 2007

theme? maybe theme = - DISGUST - INTIMACY - NOISE - PUSH AWARENESS - LOST ? -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I'm a WHATmaster? Lonelygirl15 Creators Appear at ARGfest-o-Con

ions of web pages... somewhere out there. and a mystery prize. ARGish! ok, someone go try my idea today. then paypal me if it works ;) sull On 08 Mar 2007 12:41:25 -0800, Eric Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oo, sull, you're paying attention to the ARG space? We go

Re: [videoblogging] Tracking videobloggingweek2007 videos

blip to the rescue? inside out. create a new account on blip for videobloggingweek2007. share the account with vloggers who have agreed to participate. share the feed. done. yes, trust is involved. sull On 3/8/07, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Steve Garfield and

Re: [videoblogging] Tracking videobloggingweek2007 videos

could also use the blip upload api instead of sharing blip account credentials. btw. On 3/8/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > blip to the rescue? > > inside out. > > create a new account on blip for videobloggingweek2007. > share the account with vloggers who

[videoblogging] I'm a WHATmaster? Lonelygirl15 Creators Appear at ARGfest-o-Con

created by a fan and later adopted by the LonelyGirl15 crew. http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=OpAphid fyi. -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: blog vs youtube & myspace

"grassroots" type of technologies. I dont know of anyone here who only has a myspace page, a youtube profile and a flickr account. Most take it the next level. sull On 07 Mar 2007 12:31:26 -0800, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Carter (I think) said: >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: blog vs youtube & myspace

uTube. sull On 3/6/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think it's true. The thing about comedians is, they always > generalise about everything. ;-) > > People here (like me recently) have complained about YouTube's > interface and methods, but

Re: [videoblogging] blog vs youtube & myspace

at the > same? > > Just a thought. > P > > -- > Find 1s of videoblogs and podcasts at http://mefeedia.com > my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/ > my job: http://petervandijck.net > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my bl

Re: [videoblogging] Two Joost Invites

d like the invite sent. First two replies, off > > > list, gets 'em. I will post again when they are gone. > > > > > > Remaining Joostless, > > > > > > -- > > > Kary Rogers > > > http://goodcommitment.tv > > > > > >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: if you plan it they will come(vloggercon)

t;> > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ~--> > > Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email > > design. >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Case Against Advertising in Net Video

;bumps". I suppose longer ads exist too. So it's like TV. Which makes sense since Joost is TV as VOD. Yeah... ads. yeah. whats a vlog? sull On 3/2/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , > "Heath" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon=AnythingAnywhere

. anyways whatever. see what happens. its all good. sull On 3/2/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds great in therory but I wonder if it could work, the amount of > time and energy to put on 1 con at one location, trying to put on > multiple cons and coo

[videoblogging] Vloggercon=AnythingAnywhere

long camping thing. vlog it all. an exercise that would display one of the core strengths of why videoblogging canbe important... removing geo-barriers etc. collect all the footage into a blip-powered site. :) -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon=BarcampUSA?

making video and getting paid and > selling > out > > selling out is compromizing yourself for money, popularity, or > recognition. > thanks > > On 3/1/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > better that than a bunch of > > > h

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon=BarcampUSA?

lly talk and actually be heard. > > > > > - > > . > > > > > > > > -- > Josh Leo > > www.JoshLeo.com > www.WanderingWestMichigan.com > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Heath with the NewTeeVee hat tip!

NO! On 2/28/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://valleywag.com/tech/vlog-hot/vlog-hot-wildcard-boys-heat-4-239889.php#poll_=gDOzMTM > > Vote! > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon? (was Re: Tuesday FlashMeeting)

gt; 40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > > > > > yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon? (was Re: > > > Tuesday > > > > > > > > > > > FlashMeeting) > > > &g

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlogging about Vlogging - Vlogging about Life

one. This list ain't gonna do that. > > So I'll just stop talking now, and if I can keep my mouth shut, in a > couple days this topic will be gone. > > Cheers, > Ron Watson > > On the Web: > http://pawsitivevybe.com > http://k9disc.com > http://k9disc.b

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlogging about Vlogging - Vlogging about Life

it just so happens to contain a small group of active users who give a sense of community on and offline. sull On 2/26/07, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Threaded comments would be nice. A decent search function would be as > well. > > Community. > Permanence. >

Re: [videoblogging] Does personal vlogging matter anymore?

an sure on one hand for the handful that started it, it > doesor does it.I don't know I am wondering do you > support 'personal' vlogging, I mean with all the 'shows' out there does > the personal story matter anymore. > > Heath > http://ba

Re: [videoblogging] improving on havemoneywillvlog

Yeah the mailing list, I think, was started even before the blog ;) The mailing list/group is where advocates discuss projects. It is critical. Mike, have you donated to the latest project? > http://havemoneywillvlog.com Relevance? Sull On 2/20/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [videoblogging] improving on havemoneywillvlog

ad. I think Crowdfunding works just as Crowdsourcing works. But Wikipedians are anal about new terms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism). Though I have shifted focus since last summer (fundavlog), I still see much potential in these progressive types of fundraising experiments. Sull On 2

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Joost for Mac in Beta

dn't have to wait too long for > another crack at it. > > Ryan > HawaiiVOG > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075) > Comment: http://lightfantastic.org/pgp.txt > > wj8DBQFF2fe7z+jy50P8pxcRAnALAJ0eCdfgaNOS6EkbJCJTMPdg/jfZoQCfZ/u

[videoblogging] MyBlogLog Spam

Anyone use MyBlogLog.com? Are you having sudden spamming issues... splogs and bogus friend requests? I am. -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] What are the best places to submit vlog/podcast rss feeds too?

vlog.com > podfeed.net > podcast.net > podspider.com > podcastpickle.com > getapodcast.com > clickcaster.com > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Follow up to Rocketboom break-up.

quot;He Said, She Said", it is nice to see some > > resolution. (I hate when the "MSM" does a story and never does a > > follow up.. We don't want to be like the MSM do we?) > > > > So, since nobody else has seemed to say it, congratulations Andrew! &

Re: [videoblogging] Anybody ever seen this? :D

i imagine one of several clone sites pulling in youtube vids for text ad profit using a purchasable php script. On 2/12/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.u-tube-tv.com/ > > -- > Bill C. > http://ems.blip.tv > > > -- Sull ht

Re: [videoblogging] Movies vs. videos

movie can imply more and is warmer/deeper, while video in colder and technical. sull On 12 Feb 2007 09:38:28 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had seen the video Jay Dedman recommended on Web 2.0 before > from e-learning circles or wherever, and it

Re: [videoblogging] Re: FireAnt.tv video thumbnails

yep, agreed and agreed. like i said, the effort should involve promoting both. same page ;) On 2/10/07, Frank Sinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi sull and all, > > 1) MediaRSS is what is preferred and chosen above alternatives b/c > that is the standard. It would be

Re: [videoblogging] Re: FireAnt.tv video thumbnails

%2Fwww.vastmachine.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2 > Not so hard. I attached the wp-rss2.php to that post. Id rather tell wordpress vloggers to try this before telling them to markup their posts with thumbnail semantics. but both are good to do. thumbs are important. no doubt. sull On 2/9/07, Mike

<    1   2   3   4   5   >