On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:14:29 +0200, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For PDF's it doesn't matter.
When you export you have to remember to check the box that says Embed all
fonts - otherwise it *does* matter. :o)
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:35:49 +0200, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dont think he was suggesting they are totally the same in terms of
features, just that the video and audio tracks can be the same, and he
didnt mention the advantages of mov over mp4.
Same difference. He was
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:11 +0200, Lynn Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the info. I read the page on how to get the automatic ping
thing to work but there isn't info on how to get it to work with
blogger. Any idea how to get it to automatically ping with that?
Thanks again for your
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:58:58 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You better not try to remove my name, it'll violate my by-nc-sa license!
Give me attribution or give me death! ;)
You can only copyright a work, not an idea or concept. Ie. a quick rewrite
later and the problem solved
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:17:16 +0200, Digital [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Presidents of the United States of America (PUSA) makes a video
entirely out of ericsson phones.
I'd loved this band since their self-titled debut (mmm... peaches). I'm
glad to see they're doing something fun like
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:54 +0200, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
transcode:
URL:http://www.panopticist.com/archives/159.html
It's still H.264 and thus unplayable in my Quicktime 6 :o(
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:15:25 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you export you have to remember to check the box that says Embed
all
fonts - otherwise it *does* matter. :o)
I've heard that this can actually be a violation of copyright.
That depends on:
- What you do
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:47:05 +0200, Lynn Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question. I manually pinged a video earlier that I put up
yesterday and when I went to ping today's video it wouldn't allow me
to. It said it had already been pinged but the ping that it is
recording is
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:14:01 +0200, Dave Huth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be one area where the ethics and law-making on this subject is
lagging behind
the technology enabling it. (As usual!)
Not really. There have been more cases than anyone can count. The camera
is not a new
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:54:33 +0200, Justin Chapweske
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chances are that the usual suspects of Yahoo, Google, Amazon, Microsoft,
AOL, Napster, and so on will be able to offer much more compelling
content at a potentially lower price than an independent can.
You have
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:10:08 +0200, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My impression of this guy who commented is that he's young, he's
passionate, and very
opinionated.
I was surprised to see that he's actually 30 years old. But definitely
passionate and opinionated. He strikes
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:37:17 +0200, Dave Huth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you share with us what these answers are?
IANAL so I can't cover details. I recommend this one book over and over
again. It's a college text book called Mass Media Law (by Don Pember) and
it covers all the areas
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:15:28 +0200, aroundtheperimeter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
look what this guy has done..you can leave a video comment!
http://www.blogcheese.com/andre_testo/
Nice user interface, but it'll fail for the everyone who hasn't got a big
server in their basement.
First
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:16:04 +0200, Dave Huth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, Pembroke himself says in this freedomforum.org article ( http://
www.freedomforum.org/packages/first/privacyandthepress/part3.htm ) that
general
intrusion, apart from strictly commercial purposes, is on the rise
Oh, and I forgot. I think the impact you'll see in the future is not
something that'll arrive from new legal arguments. I still think that all
these areas of public vs. private are age-old and we have plenty of legal
precedence (public views may change and we'll get new laws, but the issues
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:44:18 +0200, Paul Knight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi worrier,
Hey, I'm not worried. I know the laws to some extent and won't get into
trouble. It's the other people who should worry. :o)
I think there is a gap in the market now for one of those Bluffer
Guides on
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:16:39 +0200, Jake Ludington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more accurate criticism is at comparable bitrates, WMV targeted for
dial-up users looks better than MOV. This is one of the many reasons
Apple
adopted MP4 as their alternate standard.
MOV isn't a codec, so
quality ... but not so much so as to be
worth
2x the file size IMHO. I mean I'm still gonna have to find a way to do
it as
I want to be on the iPod ... but I just cant seem to get a MOV to a
simialr
(and quite good) quality/filesize ratio as I can for my WMVs.
On 10/24/05, Andreas
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:37:58 +0200, Christopher Bergeron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any sugestions or experiance with
producing an iPod compatible video on a PC?
Export AVI from Movie Maker. Import that into Quicktime Pro and export as
iPod friendly Quicktime movie.
-
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:30:13 +0200, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tele--to hear, and vision--to see, right?
Tele == Distant. So it's more like distant viewing. And television ain't
the same as videoblogging, yo. :o)
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:49:15 +0200, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried Avid Free DV, but I didn't like it very much
and it was a DOG on my PC.
I tried Premiere 6.5 and it started to crash. Now I'm switching to Avid
Free,
but I'm finding it a bit counterintuitive since I'm
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:33:25 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Does Avid Free only import DV? I tried to import some random MOV samples
the other day, but it wouldn't import correctly. I'm an unfortunate soul
with no DV camera. :o
] wrote:
no feed and not a blog.
Its a faux blog.
-Josh
On 10/25/05, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they don't have a feed that I can say ... won't get far without that
...
Richard
On 10/25/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:31:23 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another important part of bloggy text is that it's hypertext, ie.
any bit
can be a link to somewhere else. Rocketboom doesn't work like that
either.
Yes it does. Thats one of the special qualities that
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:04:42 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what are some examples of bloggy content, under your seemingly
unusal, extremist and militant definition?
What did I do to deserve that kind of phrasing? You were all up in arms
about naming rocketboom
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:36:16 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So give an example. Is there anyone out there now who has a
videoblog and post's videobloggy posts? Can you give a link and
describe what sets it apart?
As for pointing out of the blog there are time-based
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:04:47 +0200, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I making the right inferences?
No, damnit. You didn't pay attention. I said this is NOT a case of
either/or. It's NOT about this is a videoblog and this is not a
videoblog. It's a case of to which degree
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:08:21 +0200, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we've been collectively defining
videoblogging by practicing it for a while now it seems to me that
the highly granular, hyper-texty video that Andreas holds in high
regard is only a small part of videoblogging - and it's
12:46:53 +0200, Mat Wall-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not yet its not Andreas...in fact granularity for granularity's sake is
particularly tedious..at the moment then the 'interest' is purely
academic
On 27/10/05 3:39 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:34:40 +0200, Mat Wall-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well I think I'd prefer granularity for the sake of expression.
That's what I said.
And the word academic is not ambiguous to me and I doubt it is to you.
I don't know if you academic in the way of 'as related to
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:38:48 +0200, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone remember Andreas saying the other day that he had
developed a php script that can be added to WP that does the same
thing that the can track your subscription stats the way feedburner
does?
Anyone?
And since both are relatively small states population-wise it doesn't take
a large variation to get the number up. A 1 % increase in Alaska is a lot
less than a 1 % increase in California. :o)
- Andreas
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:54:30 +0200, BevSykes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is linked
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:32:28 +0200, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just testing if posts on yahoo groups are HTML capable:
I just recieved a text e-mail with HTML codes. It might work if you send
an actual HTML e-mail. However those are generally frowned upon. :o)
- Andreas
--
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:39:19 +0100, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Apple, for a short time, will actually replace you 5G ipod
for free without any questions.
That's what I've been reading on some of the apple sites.
Besides, it's probably covered under the 90 day
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:16:15 +0100, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 10/30/05, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Lucas!
But if I don't use that application/xml+rss, it doesn't work.
Curious and curiouser. It works for me with application/octets as
long as the extension
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:54:29 +0100, drpoulette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unlike most video sites that take videos and give nothing back to
creators, we created Revver from the beginning to support videomakers.
When you upload a video, we'll attach a RevTag -- a single frame ad at
the end of
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 05:52:02 +0100, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as you probably know, I curated the film anthology archive showing
tonight,
so i thought I would post the actual video...i think andreas may have a
SMIL
video with all the links...but for now for all you eager people,
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:07:04 +0100, printaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks funny to me, I couldn't find a way to navigate to that page
through the site, could only find it through google. Is the
quicksilver frame part of it a mirror too?
The whole site is a section of the Quicksilver
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 05:52:02 +0100, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as you probably know, I curated the film anthology archive showing
tonight,
so i thought I would post the actual video...i think andreas may have a
SMIL
video with all the links...but for now for all you eager people,
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:04:29 +0100, Kent Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other thoughts?
Why not just go to the blog? Blogs provide monthly archive pages (most do
anyway) or some other way of browsing the content. That way you don't have
to sit and wait because you're only downloading the
experience the problems you have are not all that common...
- Andreas
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 01:09:08 +0100, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thursday, November 3, 2005, 10:38:15 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
wrote:
Why not just go to the blog? Blogs provide monthly archive pages (most
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 01:24:43 +0100, Kent Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens when you discover someone's content after they're 4 months
into vlogging? There's no good way to catch up with their content
without having an XML file to point FireANT or iTunes to.
What happens when you
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:33:26 +0100, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel like he asked more in depth questions than most people. In
reading back over it, I really like what was discussed in this one.
While I doubt anyone would agree with everything (or anything) I was
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:05:37 +0100, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/4/05, chrlshogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here in Windows, we're working hard on Windows Vista Beta 2, and we've
recently been doing some work on how we parse feeds.
Sorry for asking a stupid question but, do
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:00:17 +0100, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm. There is still an issue which has cropped up here from time to
time. XML strictly requires an XML declaration at the start of the
document like:
?xml version=1.0?
Uhm, no. The text from the XML spec is: XML
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:47:39 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
They also have it backwards. We should not have to opt out of their
aggregation, but rather opt in to it. I don't like it either.
If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you already
presumably
It's just a directory. Free advertising. Just like mefeedia.com,
vlogdir.com, vlogmap.org and all the other videoblog directories.
- Andreas
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:58:58 +0100, James A. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
www.vodstock.com
I found my video on this site.. it makes it sound
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:51:28 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're enjoying a wonderful meal with a special person, overlooking an
incredible view, and all you can think is I wish I had my videocamera.
As one fo the organizers at a blogging workshop profoundly stated when
The main thing is length not file size. You're not making a 30 minute tv
show (you could, but it'd hardly be a blog). Personally I like 2 minutes
stories, but as long as you keep each entry under 4-5 minutes..
- Andreas
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:54:00 +0100, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:55:44 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
because journalists either are lazy or dont have the time to research.
usually they turn to think tanks(heritage foundation), experts, etc
for their info
Why don't speaking to someone else constitute research?
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:12:29 +0100, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that a trick question? First of all, I don't think you can
compare the average newspaper article with an average blog
article.
I wasn't, Jay was. :o)
And, for that matter, the average newspaper article. Are we
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:23:09 +0100, ronenwastaken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most 'serious' newspapers and magazines have replaced serious research
with turnover time and cost-efficiency.
I'd hate to hear what you have to say about lawyers.
*[this is a word I can never spell]
Necessary.
-
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:49:32 +0100, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Blogging in itself isn't more true than any other medium.
It's not if I sit around and blog about life on Mars. But when discussing
something that I've experienced first hand, my
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:08:43 +0100, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Truer for whom?
Ever read a news article on a subject that you're intimately familiar
with? Maybe it was about a concert you were at, a political function
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The accuracy of reporting is based on the veractiy of the individual
reporting, not the method of reporting whether through a newspaper,
blog, radio news, podcast, television news, vlog. Those are methods
and technologies,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:19:27 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
God help us if videoblogging becomes like this:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,69513,00.html?tw=rss.TEK
I'd like to see some more controversy. For example: We all know V is bossy
on camera, but I'd like to
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:53:23 +0100, ryanne hodson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/dwskc
don't know if this got posted yet
go Verdi!
Congratulations to the Node101 guys and Verdi in particular. Very nice
article and a very nice photo.
But wait... I thought news
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:49:46 +0100, rigngaffer1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am looking into this company as a way to share projects and earn a
income if my work is
popular.
Do you recieve a referral bonus for either of the links you posted?
410word.com redirects to cashbackalliance.com
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:58:23 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In this case though, you are not trying to add links to your blog,
rather your are trying to add your blog entries into Delicious so they
can be tagged and thud somehow more findable. That's perfectly
useful... but
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:37:10 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly the reason I want to develop a Vlog Digest. I find I
pick vlogs when I recognize a name that I know produces good ones.
However, I am always finding vlogs that are little gems posted by people
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:07:39 +0100, duncan speakman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the wikipedia thing sound sensible, previously i've just been making
links
to articles from the text of my posts, making them tags would seem to
kill 2
birds with 1 stone (has that expression been declared
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:36:20 +0100, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Apple could probably achieve a simlar result using itunes without the
need to use different formats. itunes seems to know how many times Ive
watched/listened to something through it. If it counts the number of
plays
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:42:18 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
so the hack we need is its ability ot accept feeds?
i wonder if itd be hard to sync to it from FireAnt.
It says you can transfer files from your PC (Windows of course), so it
might not be too hard to get automatic
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:46:55 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to remember the name of one or two films that were remade
and the remade version was far inferior to the original.
Rear Window and Planet of the Apes.
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:01:47 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not advocating censorship. I'm arguing for equal time and/or the
opportunity to talk back. If the KKK were to put up a vlog making
racist statements with no comments allowed, people would be outraged.
Not
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:05:06 +0100, dnadig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know there are no PC products other than Videora that
can claim to output an ipod happy video format.
http://www.videora.com/en-us/Converter/
Errr... Quicktime Pro?
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:55:46 +0100, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey wow, did the podcast list merge with the videoblog list?
/sarcasm!
Suxor.
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:10:31 +0100, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's quite interesitng. They're probably growing their rack space.
Brokering new deals for server space and then installing new
indrastructure. We went through a bit of this back in the day. You
buy up some new
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:59:00 +0100, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Josh is right, people get way to excited about a temporary change in
stats. For example, we will *all* see an increase in traffic around
the holidays. Why? Because that happens every year, *all* websites see
an
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:47:03 +0100, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But there is Indianapolis Colts football on that day, and yes it is this
Thursday.
I hope for your sake that your country was smart enough to buy the
license
for that game.
Man... no. On Thursday I get Detroit Lions
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:04:40 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
as a community we just need to learn respect for each other.
the personal videobloggers shouldnt diss the shows.
the shows should diss the personal videobloggers.
or if anyone does...be prepared for criticism.
Moz
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:01:49 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After railing against political correctness in some really charming
exchanges, Dick Cavett didn't seem ready after telling the interviewer
who asked if he could ask a politically incorrect question that he
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:34:13 +0100, Aimee Buyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it customary to ask permission when revlogging
someone's work in your on vlog?
As Enric says the point of CC licenses is that you don't have to ask. If
you don't change the video any CC license will do. It is
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:39:48 +0100, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
as Kent says below
when talking to press, we should all celebrate the fact that we can
all be our own video producers AND distribution
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:59:05 +0100, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
What's the deal here? You walk up to a guy after some presentation and
ask
some completely random question that isn't related to what he was
talking
about. I would be pretty
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:28:19 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being rude and irrational is a lot older. It's just been awhile since
respect became a social norm. It's funny that some consider reverting
to a childish state as new and revolutionary.
Remember, if you respect your fellow
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:52:28 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember, if you respect your fellow humans the terrorists have won.
What does this remark mean? It seems to me that it's just a random
irrelevant question.
It was indeed an attempt at being
Damn, Vimeo Vogblogiobating still only gives hits to my domain on
Google. My quest for global adoption has failed.
- Andreas
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:39:29 +0100, Steve Garfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd guess buzz.
A search over at http://inventory.overture.com gives these results for
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:59:15 +0100, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let me expand on what I meant. For a start the term 'war on text' is
supposed to be tongue in cheek, as the 'War On Terror' is one of the
most stupid things Ive ever come across.
Adrian Miles wrote this some years
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:15:08 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see the relationship. Cinema and the subset of the edit is
linear, hypertext is non-linear. This seems more poetic simile
mismatch than illuminating.
It was just a quote. Obviously it helps to read it all. :o)
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:31:07 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is why we need a Vlog Digest. It would be a sorting place where
people who were interested in art vlogs could find a selection with a
couple paragraphs description attached.
Blogs are self-organizing
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:38:12 +0100, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/23/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think we may be comparing apples and oranges
it's not really the video vs. text
the distinction if really between the 'visual' and the 'abstract'.
how the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:13:38 +0100, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
around the 23/11/05 Lucas Gonze mentioned about Re: [videoblogging]
Re: War On Text that:
Any idea where video is in there, Andreas?
video as most of us think of it is indexical in the first instance.
An index is a
IANAL. The full legal code is at URL:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode (under
Restrictions).
Since they're not linking back (or showing in the video) the URI for your
blog entry and/or your original video, they're not giving proper
attribution.
- Andreas
On Fri, 25
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:34:43 +0100, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is the concept of a general-strike long gone in the united states? Its
alive and well in many parts of Europe. I dont think the UK has had a
pproper general strike since the winter of discontent 1978-79.
Our last one
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:02:08 +0100, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's hear some more amazing Black Friday tails here you 1600 readers.
First Meiser didn't want to split hares and now you want tails. What's
up with you guys and animals?
Anyway, I've been celebrating Buy Nothing Day
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:40:27 +0100, strollingbones2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the old days (and still today), the producers of various shows
want to partner with a network because the network have the broadcast
infrastructure. But in the emerging paradigm, if a producer can make
a profit
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:03:40 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think vlogging can be greatly impacted through directories. That is
why we as a community should work to set up an open directory that
will become the accepted norm. Otherwise, others will set up slanted
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:26:21 +0100, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It brings up a good question...how many videobloggers use their blogs
to post text and video? (as in text is when no video is accompanying
the text)
Me. :o)
I really don't see why anyone should be limited to just posting
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:27:17 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wednesday stay up all night drinking.
Thursday sleep all morning, then eat all afternoon
Thursday/Friday night stand in lines for hours
So that Friday morning you can crowd into a store with a huge mass of
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:37:10 +0100, Beth Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm traveling from the US to London in two weeks for the Gloval Voices
Summit and trying to get organize so I can live blog and vlog. What
type of adaptor do I need to charge up my batteries for my
laptop/camera.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:11:10 +0100, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here in the U.S. I've taken photos and video in airports, including
within the secure area. I did not see any signs or hear any
announcements that suggested I could not. (Of course a good sketch
artist with enough time
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:37:44 +0100, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rocketboom's layout works because it is updated daily...not many
people delve into their archives (i imagine)
Definitely wrong. People check back into the recent archives because
of the thumbnails below. There is
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:44:07 +0100, Fire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUT, having said that, there is a reason why Grandma and Granpa don't
get online, and thats because
every interface is so daunting... and if your layout is different from
mine - we have a different interface...
thus, in the
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:15:26 +0100, Amanda Congdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try clicking view 2 on the top of the archive page? We have
two different ways to view our archives, one with just the thumbnails
and another with story links included for searchability.
Nope, I didn't know
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:09:29 +0100, Aimee Buyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html
I don't know whether I should laugh or cry. Barbie Too Hot For Internet
Archive.
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:06:17 +0100, Will Luers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ezedia is really basic quicktime authoring software and it is free if
you limit the amount of
frames and objects per project.
I have looked at Ezedia before, but backed away on the cost (cheaper than
LiveStage, but
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:55:47 +0100, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
around the 29/11/05 Ted Tagami mentioned about Re: [videoblogging]
making a vlog soft that:
I would like to add a link within my video. Can't you do this in QT Pro?
yes, and no.
using QT pro you can add a text track
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:07:05 +0100, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not all videoblogs are vodcasts ;-)
I agree...and not all vodcasts are videoblogs. ;-)
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Fair Use related to Copyright Law, not Trademark Law.
- Andreas
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:49:35 +0100, Joan Khoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that it would be fair use. But Mattel seems lawsuit-happy
so I
wouldn't risk it. It really turned me off Barbies to read up on all those
401 - 500 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
