not exactly 'point and shoot'.
Cheers
Seve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jim Turner jtur...@... wrote:
Give us the deets Pete. What are the specs etc on RedOne as it looks
intriguing.
Jim
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Pete Prodoehl ras...@... wrote:
Hmmm
Hmmm, the Flip?
I'm shooting with the RED ONE in 2010. :)
Pete
Joly MacFie wrote:
I think the flip (I got the HD for xmas) could be transformational -
it's like the brownie cam of videoblogging..
It's not just the cam but also the flipshare software/service that
comes with it...
It's
I've found Audio-technica and too good to be true know each other
quite well...
I think a good (not great) wireless lav might start around $300 or so.
Pete
Caleb Clark wrote:
I just discovered the Audio-technica ATR288W, seems almost too good to be
true for $120...I'm sure the range is
So just to be clear... you guys are all cool with someone (oh, I dunno,
let's say a musician) taking your video, and using it in any way they
like, for whatever purpose they choose, even if you don't agree with it,
and even if you have not released it under a sharing license?
So if a
From what I know of RED workflow, you work on smaller proxy files, and
then with the final rendering, the hi-res versions are used. This makes
editing *much* faster, as we've just learned...
Here's some related info on FCP and proxy editing:
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/8/1057975
and cohorts who lost
touch with each other, so we're hoping it won't be an issue. Anything
I've been involved with I get permission from others to apply a proper
license.
Pete
Frank Carver wrote:
2009/10/5 Pete Prodoehl ras...@gmail.com
I put my 20+ year old box of audio cassettes to good
I put my 20+ year old box of audio cassettes to good use...
And you can see some of the results here:
http://www.mkepunk.com/
I consider myself an archivist and documentarian which are fancy
words for packrat and guy who doesn't throw things away... ever!
Sometimes you can only see the
Welcome back!
I've been upload more videos lately...
Mainly right here:
http://raster.blip.tv/
That is all.
(I've been so busy, I haven't had to time interact much with the
community, but I still lurk now and then...)
Pete
paul.knig...@btinternet.com wrote:
It's almost been two years
Jay dedman wrote:
Pretty exciting that a video hosting site will allow playback of videos in
Ogg. I know its still confusing as to why anyone should use the Ogg video
codec...
Because ultimately, if you want to preserve your work for the future,
open formats are the way to go...
Ask Mark
I've had 3 Lacie power supplies fail (overheated I think) but not the
actual drive mechanism itself. I just ordered replacement power
supplies. Oh, these Lacie's run all the time, tons of read/writes, and
they've done fairly well.
Pete
David Terranova wrote:
I vaguely remember a similar
I got the PDF last night, and pretty much read it straight through.
Really nicely done. I recommend it.
Pete
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
Bought a .pdf copy a couple of months ago; great stuff.
Jan
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Caleb J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merry NY Band.
Maybe they didn't like the YouTube terms of service.
I know I don't! :)
Pete
David King wrote:
I'm missing why they couldn't just use youtube ...?
Things never cease to amaze me.
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17556
But the US Army has gone the other way, actively encouraging
Jay dedman wrote:
I dont know if this is new, but i just noticed this on youtube.
Miss B linked to this home video of a guy dancing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLBmniQbGX0
If you scroll down, you see that it says buy this song on Amazon or iTunes.
I wonder if the guy just uploaded the
David Terranova wrote:
This actually brings me on to another point.
I’ve been having all sorts of problems when using public players (that
aren’t my own) to play my anamorphic 16:9 FLV videos.
When uploading to blip.tv, for example, the widescreen video would be
squashed into a square
Yeah, I picked up a Canon ZR800 (which has audio input) earlier this
year for about $150 - super-cheap for a small simple camera.
Pete
Bill Cammack wrote:
Canon ZR900 - $218.95
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/539205-REG/Canon_2487B001_ZR_900_MiniDV_Camcorder.html
or
Michael Verdi wrote:
I've been using the JW Media Player for a while and I really like it.
It will play H.264 files and you can have it fall back to a flv file
for people who don't have a flash plugin that plays H.264. You can set
it so the controls disappear like the Vimeo player. It does
Tom wrote:
Are people vlogging more, but posting less?
Are people leaving the group?
Like me, have you become a lurker, not a poster?
I've become much more of a lurker.
Did you loose interest in vlogging?
Nope, just lacking the time lately...
Or, just don't have the time to keep it up?
How about sub $200? You can get Final Cut Express for $155 right now,
and it's pretty similar to Final Cut Pro, and can use almost all of the
plugins/filters that FCP can.
I spent last week evaluating about 30 free filters, so I've got a
editing suite way more powerful than iMovie and way
joshua.kuss wrote:
Questions:
1. How did you get into vlogging?
I was involved in the beginning of podcasting, and knew at the time that
video would be the next big thing. I started experimenting with video
online, and eventually found the vloggers, probably via way of (audio)
podcasting.
Mac Mac-nerds have told me they follow this policy:
Laptop work or home - Get AppleCare
Desktop Mac at work - Get AppleCare
Desktop Mac at home - Skip AppleCare if you want...
But I did get AppleCare with the last iMac I got at home, mainly cuz I
feel Apple's quality has sunk in the last few
plugins, and then just add in the free ones
later, there are a bunch listed on the FxFactory page.)
Pete
Bren wrote:
In a previous thread, Pete Prodoehl mentioned some free filters for Final
Cut Express. I'm curious how everyone pimps out their FCE (or FCPro). I've
been using the plain vanilla
duncan wrote:
Hi everyone,
i haven't been very present on this list for a while, but I just got an
extremely rude email from someone (who didn't sign off but their email
address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe someone knows them. Anyway, they are complaining about a video that
was posted from
A friend sent me that link last night, probably because I just announced
that I'll be shooting a documentary over the next 4 months (and then
editing for about 4 months.)
At first, I figured I could do it all with no budget, but in reality,
there will be expenses (but I believe they will be
New business idea:
Provide footage of a bunch of different people saying:
Happy Birthday [insert name here]!
Then when you need a video, you go and choose from all the clips that
have the name you want.
Sound good? ok.. go! (and send me a % of the profits)
Pete
Darren Winkler Darren
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just
1000
true fans:
http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
I forgot to add how much I like this blog post.
Ive always felt like video creators (like many here) could make a
Who doesn't love Irina? I mean... come on!
Was I the first... awww, I feel special. :)
Pete
Irina wrote:
welcome back pete!
i think u are officially my first fan
:)
On 3/17/08, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, I've been absent a while, but now have a dvcam, and Final
Richard Amirault wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David King
Question for y'all - I have a Xacti HD-1A, and I'm noticing that once in
awhile I record something that looks good on video, but the audio part is
way too loud for the internal mic to handle... so everything sounds
city.
If anyone has some footage online already that might work (or if you can
get it online for us to check out) please email me off-list. If we can
use it, we can pay you. (We don't have a huge budget, but we're artists
too, and artists deserve to get paid!)
thanks peeps...
Pete Prodoehl
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
Feel a bit like a broken record but if you advertise things you really like
- dare I say 'love' - you can't really go too far wrong.
Advertise your fave internet cafe, fave restaurant, mom-n-pop hardware
store, fave soft and hardware.
Think hyper-local. Hyper-local
Irina wrote:
again, i have NOT earned enough money from advertising to pay my rent (not
even close really)
You could probably make enough working in the Bay Area to pay rent and
live in the Midwest.
But then... the commute would kill you. :)
Pete
Just taking a break from the normal Videoblogging talk. :)
BarCampMilwaukee2 is happening on Oct 13/14, 2007 at Bucketworks in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/235252/
I'd like to invite all videobloggers to show up and show them how it's
done... with video! Schlomo
Ron Watson wrote:
I'm sure this has been covered a hundred times.
Can anyone help me out with a link to easy FLV encoding on OSX 10.4.x?
Have you tried the 'difficult' FLV encoding on OS X using ffmpegX?
Once you've got all installed, and get a formula down, it's not too bad
(though it's
Hey suckers! I'm back...
Well, at least for Videoblogging Week 2007.
I'll get 7 videos up by the end of the week, maybe not 1 per day, but
damn, math is hard you know.
So stop by tinkernet.org and see what's new!
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Steve Rhodes wrote:
It has been annouced that Josh will be released.
Awesome! Maybe there is such a thing as freedom...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Hey group, I've just been lurking lately, as life for me has been way
to crazy to do any video stuff lately... (I hope that changes soon!)
Anyway, I had to move embedthevideo.com to a new server - has anyone
seen any problems with it in the last day or so?
http://embedthevideo.com/
I want to
Mike Meiser wrote:
It's funny my gut reaction was that we had an imposter posting under Mike
Hudack, I've never known him to be so blunt and harsh.
But then I've got to say, as a non-programmer... drupal, plone and the whole
CMS thing... are atrocities that developers foist onto everyday
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now you can link directly to any point within a video — a feature
that is useful if you want to share a specific part of a video. To
use the feature, you simply take the normal link and append the
Susan Kirkpatrick wrote:
What happens if someone pays, asks you to do something immoral...? You
then
return the money? My point is simply that shouldn't you have someone
propose a post first, then you say Yes, I'll do it, then they pay? I bet
more people would be willing to do this if
On 6/5/06, Nathan Freitas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was most surprised by how disconnected and dismissive theTWiT/dl.tv/digg crowd was towards videoblogging in general. Hopefullythey will show up and have a change of heart and understand why going toa conference at the Swedish American Hall is
Michael Verdi wrote:
I wanted to keep this conversation going - been thinking about it for a
while now.
Looking for help thinking through this...
So if I release work under creative commons share alike - people are
free to
use my work commercially only when they use the work in it's
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
One of the things I've hatted the most, about today's ISP's, is that
they do
NOT allow you to become true node on the Internet. Being a true node on
the
Internet implies you can be both client and server. Which means that you
need to allow incoming ports.
Bill Streeter wrote:
Oh and I'm sorry to have committed the sin of being born a white man.
It was a total accident I swear.
Jay dedman wrote:
I also cringe when Ryanne goes off about too many white men involved
in videoblogging.
i feel i got to be guilty.
Let's all sing along to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video
playlists.
Finally, my XSPF playlist can be put to use! If someone can test it
out and let me know if it works, that would be great:
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Hello Pete,
On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video
playlists.
Finally, my XSPF playlist can
WWWhatsup wrote:
hmmm, looking at your file, pete, it seems the actual media links
come in the form:
http://tinkernet.org/enclosure.cgi/http://www.archive.org/download/Tjaw_1/20060505tjaw.mov
which just loads in your page, rather than the media. If wondered you edited out the cgi bit,
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Hello Pete,
On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video
playlists.
Finally, my XSPF playlist can
David Meade wrote:
It just means that you need to have an internet address with which to point
to vPIP ... many people upload vPIP to their webserver and use their own
url ... however if youre using blogger you may not have a webspace to use.
So then you'll need to find a place where vPIP
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Finally, my XSPF playlist can be put to use! If someone can test it
out and let me know if it works, that would be great:
http://tinkernet.org/xspf/
It doesn't work for me.
Can you try again? The URLs I use do issue a 302 Found header and then
Hey folks, I just updated embedthevideo.com with the code changes from
Josh Kinberg, Michael Verdi, Markus Sandy and myself.
If you experience any problem, let me know.
Thanks...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
SPONSORED LINKS
mgmoon wrote:
I picked up a very inexpensive ($80us) used Vivitar DVR-310 with a
1gig memory card. This Digital Video Recorder (DVR) stores the video
on SD memory cards. The unit is very small (fits in a shirt pocket)
and also has a built in 3mb camera and mp3 player.
It can tape video in
Nerissa (TheVideoQueen) wrote:
If you link to videos that I host and pay for bandwidth then you are stealing
bandwidth.
One of the problems is see is that some folks have the above opinion,
that others are stealing their bandwidth. If this is so, is the correct
solution that people should
Jen Simmons wrote:
post. The best / clearest way to make sure you get credit / notice for
your own video is to put the credit you want to get in the video. Adding
www.yoururl.com at the end for 2 seconds does this perfectly.
This brings up a question I've had, I put the URL of my site at the
Michael Sullivan wrote:
i think audio 'talk show' type content can often become irrelevent after
some time passes whereas video is *more likely* to maintain a higer value as
time passes.
how many people go back and listen to a podcast from a year ago?
unless these independent shows include
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Steph,
Your server is not configured for opml files. The file is being sent as
text/plain where it probably should be sent as text/xml or something like
that.
I use text/xml for the mime-type.
Also, the feed may or may not be valid, depending on who you ask...
Michael Sullivan wrote:
Ok, I use technorati but not until today did i go looking for an OPML so I
could export videobloggingweek2006 tag.
Can it be that they do not support OPML? This is insane!
Which part is insane? The fact that Technorati might not support a
standard like OPML? (hurm...
Markus Sandy wrote:
Great news! Congrats you guys.
Working with Lucas. That's the icing on the cake if you ask me. That
sounds like fun.
Man, I'm getting more impressed with Yahoo's thinking all the time.
No kidding...
I'm still waiting for the day Yahoo! offers to buy me.
Pete
--
Peter Van Dijck wrote:
Hey all,
I am trying to find a good license to open up the data about
videoblogging in Mefeedia, so anyone can start a directory or do other
crazy shit like that. I think it's important - if videoblogs are easy
to find, they'll stand a much better chance, and data like
Stephanie Bryant wrote:
OK, for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, we lose an hour.
(Fall back: set the clock back by 1 hour, thereby gaining an extra
hour. Spring forward: set the clock forward an hour, thereby
skipping an hour of the day.)
Well, you don't really gain or lose an hour,
maui_marv wrote:
will also unvail EVE our autosensing streaming patented
they have the technology, the patents the people to take this to
Software patents are evil...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web,
gmjoyce_y wrote:
Which codec are you all using when creating Quicktime movies for the
web? I know 3ivx used to be popular but has it been supplanted by
H.264?
I'm looking for a high quality picture and a codec/format most computer
users can play easily. (Aren't we all? ;-))
Oh, and
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The other thing about iTunes/iPod is that no one else can sell
copy-protected music for the iPod because iPod only supports Apple's
DRM (which Apple does not allow anyone else to use). So its a
completely closed system. No one else can sell copy-protected files
for the
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The nice thing about the FeedBurner tracker for enclosures is also that
you'll know the difference between clickthroughs from your feed vs.
clickthroughs from your website.
How accurate will these be?
In my tests, using different URLs in my feed and on my site, I noticed
jonny goldstein wrote:
If you haven't already, I recommend checking out Free Culture by
Laurence Lessig from your local library to get a snapshot of where the
legal system is today regarding I.P., how it got there, and how it
could be changed for the better.
One of the coolest things about
Richard Show wrote:
In wordpress, is it possible to make a post that will go in a category, but
not on the main page?
Example:
I have a category called trains and I have a feed associated with that
category.
I create a post about trains and I want people who subscribe to my trains
Michael Sullivan wrote:
let's just call it a pet peeve of mine.
i'm not going to try and convince anyone to structure their urls in a
specific way, but I have stated my preference which I think offers more
clarity and logic without cryptic format that is more complicated to
decipher (as you
Michael Sullivan wrote:
c'mon man...
;-)
i'm talking within the bounds of trust and generalities here.
tinkernet.org could be a link to an .exe.
Gimme 5 minutes... just kidding.
Ok, I was playing devil's advocate a bit.
I've learned from years of dealing with this stuff:
You can't trust
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Here's a good explanation on Trackbacks and Pingbacks:
http://codex.wordpress.org/Introduction_to_Blogging#Trackbacks
They're very similar but slightly different in their technical
implementation.
The easiest way to describe the concept is remote comments.
Sometimes
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Just to reiterate... I believe these URLs work as expected in FireAnt.
Please send me an RSS feed that uses this option in Feedburner so I can
double check. Thanks.
My feed has always been fine:
http://tinkernet.org/feed/
has enclosure links like so:
Stephanie Bryant wrote:
dot dot dot
I don't even know if I'll ever see royalties, Josh. Writing a book makes
less than minimum wage.
I'm still waiting for my check from O'Reilly...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group
Michael Verdi wrote:
- I come at this as an artist who very much respects people's right to get
paid for their work and on the other hand I also believe that by
contributing to and participating in culture (popular and otherwise) you
give up total control over your work. A few years ago I made
Kitka wrote:
Copyrights aside... I think it's more important to set up some online
free system to contact either an individual or a company in order to
facilitate the process of asking to use/sample content. Musicians,
film-makers and artists should all have freely avaliable contact
Kitka wrote:
Thanks Paul, I agree with you too. In the media world, there IS such
a thing as a cease and desist. I was talking with someone from the
CBC the other day (more about this subject at a later date) and he
told me about how someone was compiling a Top 100 songs list for a
major
Kitka wrote:
Gees, Pete... take a chill pill.
Ok, chilling out now...
I guess in the end I just want to make sure that the newbies that show
up here are aware of the issues, and we, as the folks who answer the
how to questions give good advice that won't get them into legal hot
water, or
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
On a somewhat related note, is there a way we can create a list of
people who are interested in attending Vloggercon? I'm thinking
something like Evite that shows maybe and yes.
http://upcoming.org/event/61589/
Shows me who is attending, and who is watching. ;)
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
I could quickly build a little form and put the name/status in a
database, but I do not think it would be as valueable if hosted on
VlogMap.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3/14/06, Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shame
missbhavens1969 wrote:
If you find a way to compress to a format viewable by all people on all
computers with all
platforms from all browsers, please let me know about it! I was under the
impression that
that absolutely does not exist.
ASCII text
Hmmm, actually, that might not even
gottadiva wrote:
What would you consider the top ten most annoying vlogging
errors/mistakes.
I'll start - and I know that my opinion is going to be controversial
1. It irks me when people use copy protected material that they don't
have the legal right to use. For example many vlogs
gottadiva wrote:
What irks me is when people on the videoblogging group bring up the
copyright issue for the umpteenth time... seriously folks, if you
have nothing new to contribute to this topic, move on.
Kitka,
I understand your frustration. But, I think that the reason this topic
Devlon wrote:
http://magnatune.com/ has pod-safe music
Not sure about vlog-safe, but I don't know if there would be a huge
distinction...I am sure someone will point out one if there is.
I just googled pod safe music
http://music.podshow.com/
http://www.podsafeaudio.com/
...and the list
Paul Knight wrote:
I agree with Kitka, I still don't see that if you use a soundtrack that
someone else has performed, because you are not making money from it, or
shouldn't be, then a piece of music is like an advert for the copyright
owner. Nothing more than product placement such as a
Jay dedman wrote:
a little off-topic.
does anyone know of an online service that offers a community calender.
I want a group of people to be able to post notices to a shared calender.
(the Yahoo Group calender isn't good working for what we're doing)
I like to use Upcoming.org
It does
Frida Kahlo wrote:
hi guys
I have a technical problem for the mac boys.
(its ten years since I last played with macs)
In the left corner we have an IBM laptop running windows XP pro. In the right
corner a brand new powerbook running OS X. In the centre a day old ipod +
various cables.
T.Whid wrote:
I vote crossover cable.
Then mount either the PC volume on the mac or vice versa and copy over
the data. If you don't have a crossover cable you can use the ipod to
transfer the stuff. You'll need to decide if it will take longer to
copy the data twice or got and get a
Bill Streeter wrote:
I may be splitting hairs here, but the author lists Public Domain
as a type of CC license. But I don' think that this is the case. I
thought that Public Domain was a part of standard copyright law. Am
I wrong about this?
But I do see his point on the definitions of
Markus Sandy wrote:
Pete Prodoehl wrote
Until then, if you release your work under a CC license, you might as
well outline what you think it means, as I've attempted to do here:
http://tinkernet.org/usage/
It's the lightnet thing to do. :)
that's very nicely done Pete
do you
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:49:42 +0100, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until then, if you release your work under a CC license, you might as
well outline what you think it means, as I've attempted to do here:
http://tinkernet.org/usage/
It's the lightnet
Andy Carvin wrote:
Meanwhile, it's ironic that his blog's fine print states � Copyright
2003-2005 SourceLabs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Because of this,
technically we can't quote anything on his blog without receiving his
permission first. Of course, that wouldn't be the case if it had been
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Open Source is wy more confusing than CC.
To be certified Open Source you must use an Open Source license, and
there are way more options than the 18 CC licenses.
Here's a taste of them:
http://opensource.org/licenses/
Open Source is actually pretty tricky and
Richard Show wrote:
then Bob's your uncle. ?
It's foreign-speak for you're all set or you're good to go
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To
Peter Van Dijck wrote:
is young but.and this is a big but.what if they continue to
use it after High School and College?
I think that's as unlikely as your daughter who is into goth still
wearing those clothes in 10 years.
I dunno, I still wear the same funny clothes I did almost 20
Enric wrote:
Perhaps a wiki would work well? Then anyone could add entries and
reviews.
http://voxmedia.org/w/index.php/Video
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Daryl Watson wrote:
Hi Bill,
There is a link to our promo (18 secs) here:
http://feztv.blogspot.com
Or direct to the movie from here:
http://ia300030.us.archive.org/1/items/Fez_TV_promotional_video/FezTV_Promo.mov
Hey just a note... You should use this URL:
Matt Haughey (of Metafilter and other things) wrote about MySpace here:
http://a.wholelottanothing.org/2006/02/myutterconfusio.html
I found it interesting...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
aroundtheperimeter wrote:
Does anybody have some good links on reviews of video editing
software? I'm trying to choose between Avid, Vegas, Adobe, or Final
Cut Pro. Thanks
I did a few reviews in the wiki:
http://voxmedia.org/w/index.php/Videoblogging_Software
but not many others have
Kunga wrote:
Just can't help wondering if anyone here was as blown away by the
amazing Olympics Closing Ceremony last night as I was. Because We
Believe sung by Andrea Bocelli with the hundreds of Brides walking
out onto the stage - I mean to me it was one of the most astounding
live
David Howell wrote:
No new video iPod. A new Mac Mini and a iPod Boom-box were announced
today though.
Which brings up the question, is this a big step in video aggregation?
If I've read it right, I can connect a Mac mini to my TV, and then use
iTunes on any Mac on my home network to
Cote289 wrote:
Here is the big picture:
I am working on taking steps toward building the various pieces of
this service. The download numbers i'm asking for are to help me
accurately design the content hosting and delivery system for an early
beta of part of the system that will give
Frank Carver wrote:
Sunday, February 26, 2006, 2:39:39 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
but for whatever reason, MySpace still seems like a dead end.
doesnt seem like it will last.
I like to think that media we create will last...so it means something
in the future.
I wonder if MySpace has that kind of
Jay dedman wrote:
on another note, MySpace is also the cool place to be NOW.
but what happpens in 3 years?
suddenly MySpace is no longer cool and its Schibiz (my new imaginary site).
all the MySpace stuff just dies away.
correct me if im wrong:
as a blogger, Im making a space on the web
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
But then you have to fill in the page about the video all over again, don't
you? Uh, not to be rude, but why do you put up with that kind of
performance? Why does anyone? There are lots of other free services out
there that work a lot better
Crap, I don't know what
1 - 100 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
