The effect on conductivity of increasing loading of hydrogen in Pd,
and its relation to temperature, i.e. the effects of electron
fugacity, was discussed on pages 6-9 of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/%7Ehheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf
It should not be a surprise to find similar effects in other
Yes
after careful consideration, watching your behavior here and other
places, and other sources, and numerous attempts to explain to you the
purpose of this forum, which you just choose to ignore, that is my
conclusion. If youd care to take an anonymous vote of forum members, I
would be happy
I think MY is doing a good job here. If it were not for her, Cude,
and a few others, this place would see a frenzy of
chicken-counting before the hatching takes place, at least when it
comes to Rossi.
Don't you know ? Vortex is the number one place for Rossi Fans.
Ooopps, sorry, i thought you we're talking about Valentino.
From: Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2012 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simple, even
The first topic of discussion with the conservative oriented, employer
friendly Kiplinger News Letter, published Jan 6, 2012, was the topic of
Energy. It was fascinating and unusually lengthy discussion on energy, too.
I've hi-lighted in red what I thought were some surprising observations:
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
[Personal comment: Obviously, if Rossi related competition claims pan
out in the near future, that would initiate a sustained and permanent drop
in global oil prices, despite rising world demand. Granted, It may not
happen
-Original Message-
From: Vorl Bek
I think MY is doing a good job here. If it were not for her, Cude,
and a few others, this place would see a frenzy of chicken-counting before
the hatching takes place, at least when it comes to Rossi.
Ya' know... Vorl is correct about this, but in a
Jed sez:
Regarding MY:
...
No, I do not see your point. Your comment seems idiotic.
Why are you quibbling about this? You can see this is a test.
You keep demanding tests. When he does one, you demand it
should not be a test but a practical application instead.
I think you are arguing for
[snip] Many of us suspected this all along - that the technology is real but
the
implementation is ... not just premature, but closer to an abortion.
[/snip]
I would also put the MAHG in this same category , IMHO the enabling geometry
is self destructing in both cases. I don't know if the
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
There has been way too much chicken-counting here. Yet, since this is an
advocacy group - its mission is not to prejudge and chastise - and this
situation provide an inherent conflict in
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you are being silly.
Of course I am. I am pointing out that it's also silly to stand in a small
room shivering in overcoats in the presence of a machine claimed to make (I
forget the claim for that model)
Cooper pairing is a quantum effect of protons which has been mentioned by
Axil and others wrt Rossi. Cooper pairing is possible in all Fermions, not
just electrons. This terminology is a bit confusing, and it is too bad we do
not have a different name for it with protons - since Leon Cooper did
I am usually put off when someone mentions going faster than light speed. I
think the person who is saying this is misinformed and nieve. Now I have
discovered a low energy classical condition that may allow for FTL, but its
only a possibility.
Here is a perfect example of his tangential response style:
*Q: I understand that you have been negotiating with Home Depot? Have
they seen the Ecat yet? Has it been tested for them?
A: We are in discussion with many possible distributors. We will give
precise information when any deal will
Vorl,
RE: frenzied chicken counting...
I suggest you go back in the Vortex-l archive to ~Feb 2011, and start
reading. This is long *before* MY showed up, and you will find plenty of
skepticism from the usual contributors here, including myself. There were
postings about Petroldragon, the
Hi Mary Yugo,
I've become pretty jaded about CF, and especially Rossi, so have
mostly quit following anything except your comments -- I know if
anything believable shows up, you'll be right on it...
also, spending more time with a 13 year crusade re aspartame
(methanol, formaldehyde) toxicity:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In Brian Ahern's work on the Arata effect, which... is NOT
the F-P effect
So we're witness to not one, but TWO miracles of energy production that
just happen to involve hydrogen-metal systems?
One miracle is enough to
No, we count the eggs. If some are hidden then we try to estimate how they are
packed in the nest, to estimate the total number. We analyze the photographs to
determine their size. We try to determine the species from the size, colour and
pattern. From the size we calculate the mass, and
That was hilarious Alan, and oh so descriptive of what we do here.. or most of
us try to do here! Excellent and amusing analogy...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 11:43 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
That is a fair comment from the bleacher section, since superficially using
LENR as an umbrella for everything related to hydrogen may make it seem
like two miracles. However deuterium is completely different from hydrogen
in so many ways that the two can be considered to be completely different
Jones:
Thanks for your diplomatic comments on my late night posting... I will
reread and think about them.
Trying to up the SNR a notch or two...
RE: Cooper pairs...
This is one of my pet peeves about the old, simplistic atomic models. We
were taught the following in school/college:
- opposite
Hi everyone!
Interesting list, to say the least.
I like Mary Yugo's contributions, even if some of you feel that she's
trolling or quibbling. I don't agree with some of her conclusions, but
more often than not she raises interesting points that are helpful to take
into account, making her
Welcome Eric,
Thx for the feedback… this seems to be your first post. A few questions if I
may…
1) How long have you been monitoring this forum before posting? That is not a
bad thing; most are a little timid to post until after having monitored the
forum for a little while; getting to know
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi is quite clear that his target is to make a million units in
calendar year 2012. Defkalion are quite clear about a target for 300,000
larger and more powerful machines in about the same time frame.
That is incorrect. Defkalion hopes to build a
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
No, we count the eggs. If some are hidden then we try to estimate how they
are packed in the nest, to estimate the total number. We analyze the
photographs to determine their size. . . .
Well said!
I hope we can do more, soon. I hope to provide more solid
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the welcome. Replies inline.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Welcome Eric,
Thx for the feedback… this seems to be your first post. A few questions
if I may…
1) How long have you been monitoring this forum
See:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=836
Go down several messages, to the one that begins:
Every charge of a Hyperion reactor (assuming a single reactor kernel)
requires approx 10gr of specially prepared Ni powder . . .
Assuming the Ni or Pd in a cold fusion cell does
yes, I made the same analysis.
price of oil will get low, those who own reserve will sell them as fast as
possible.
by the way the prospection won't be affordable anymore, and we will soon
forget abour shale oil/gas and deepwater drilling.
it is a well known fact in geostrategy, that the cause
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=836
Go down several messages, to the one that begins:
Every charge of a Hyperion reactor (assuming a single reactor kernel)
requires approx 10gr of
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am absolutely astounded that anyone really cares about this compared to
other possible concerns about this presumed technology or about other
wastes in other places. 10 grams of nickel for 6 or more months or
providing what? -- a dozen or more kilowatts
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it is not ridiculous. You are being ridiculous, negative, and silly.
Cut the crap. It is a perfectly legitimate question. The information
provided by Defkalion on Ni in response to this question is very useful.
Thanks for the answers, and welcome aboard!
I think 2012 will be a most important turning point…
As far as ‘rules’ see:
http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html#rules
Bill Beaty
http://amasci.com/billb.html
is the list founder and appreciates any contributions to help pay for keeping
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone seriously think that in the foreseeable future, the limiting
feature of making energy by nickel-hydrogen fusion is going to be the
supply of nickel?
No, we do not think that, because we understand something about the
reaction. Again, you are
How much Ni is used in a AA size NiCad battery In the battery recycling
Wikipedia page, it has a table which shows that a NiCad is 22% Ni, and NiMH
is 35% (I assume by mass?). What's an AA weigh, a few tens of grams? 100g?
-m
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Global Ni use/production was discussed many months ago here, but I think
it's a little over a million pounds/year.. no, I think it was a million+
tons/year! Someone also calc'd that it would take about 25% of that to
supply domestic e-cats globally... obviously a LOT of wiggle-room on those
Here is something I added to the discussion at Defkalion:
In the information you copied from INSG.org, they noted there may be Ni on
the sea floor. It is also fairly abundant in sea water, at 480 ng/kg. That
is a lot more than Zr, Ti, Au or Pd, for example. (These elements have been
used in cold
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In short, forget the bogus two miracle argument.
Sure I'll forget the bogus two miracle argument -- especially since I
never encountered it.
As for the valid two miracle argument, its not going to go away simply
because
From: James Bowery
* Tell me I'm wrong.
Yes, James, you are wrong.
Not just wrong but possibly wrong for several reasons, depending on
semantics and your writing skills.
First off, are you a native English speaker?
We are very tolerant of differences in languages and translations of
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The first thing they asked about the Fleischmann-Pons experiments was: Is
there enough palladium to do this? Fleischmann answered: No, there
isn't. He said that at MIT and many other places. I think he was right, as
I
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't guarantee what a typical law maker or influential industrialist
would ask first but I bet most of the thrust would be on does it work, has
it been independently tested, and how do we know the huge claims are
valid? And even if they ask about the
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't guarantee what a typical law maker or influential industrialist
would ask first but I bet most of the thrust would be on does it work, has
it been independently tested, and
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh yes, because I am so far off the mark. Why don't you get upset with
Defkalion and Rossi for jerking the entire world along with their
unsupported claims, unconfirmed customers, unproven, unpatented, and
uncertain
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi has a patent in Italy which is enforceable in the entire EU.
No. 0001387256
T
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi has a patent in Italy which is enforceable in the entire EU.
No. 0001387256
Of course, one must have the funds to defend any patent. Enforcement
is the burden of the patent holder.
T
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi has a patent in Italy which is enforceable in the entire EU.
No. 0001387256
Of course, one must have the funds to defend any patent.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You say: D+D = He4 reaction involves two pairs of fermions and even
accuse me of 'forgetting' something.
Where are these two pairs fermions of which you speak ? What did I forget?
Where are two pairs of anything?
Two
Regarding MY, Jed sez:
Okay, that's it! I am sick of your useless, gratuitous,
snide comments. You add nothing to the discussion saying
that kind of thing. I am adding you to my auto-delete file.
You are a tiresome jerk. Go away.
I suppose I should say, Shoot! There goes my evening
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi has a patent in Italy which is enforceable in the entire EU.
No. 0001387256
Rossi's patent is essentially worthless because it
Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent.
These many waves have the same waveform; they are all in fact the same
wave. Since particles are matter waves, N particles that are identical and
indistinguishable are coherent. These matter waves can be made identical
by
49 matches
Mail list logo
