*lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ViolanteVproceedinga.pdf*
**
This subject is very controversial and hard to test.
This is why I like the laser irradiation of gold nano-particles a lot. The
effect is so strong that the results are reflected in U232 isotope
concentration.
*Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U
Dennis
Were you using 5 micron nickel particles as per Rossi and DGT?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:37 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nano nickel
Health/safety
First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed out about the
health risks. I personally suffered
Since I answered your quest, please be kind enough to answer mind because I
need some sort of start on this; some reference, subfield of subject.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.orgwrote:
On 5/1/2013 6:27 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
Science recognizes that
On 5/2/2013 11:06 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
*/Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its
aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation /*
I don't see any mention of screening in the text of that paper. Can
you point me to a paragraph that discusses what you
http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/13138/1/thesis.pdf
This experimenter found not much alpha decay help from high powered lasers
alone.
Sorry, the screening comes from polariton production by laser stimuli of
nano-particles.
Read about it here
Joseph,
So sorry, please excuse me, the answer I requested is still pending.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/13138/1/thesis.pdf
This experimenter found not much alpha decay help from high powered lasers
This may be the reason why nanoplamonic experimentation is usually done
using gold. Nickel is very reactive.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
My guess is that these are the hardest to
On May 2, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
How do theories explain lead, boron, iron and beryllium in LENR ash?
Transmutation occurs but not at the a rate required to make detectable
energy. Addition of a hydron to a target atom frequently is followed
by fission into smaller fragments.
Google alerts brought me this. I do not know what to make of it.
http://www.ted.com/conversations/18086/cold_fusion_conjecture_applyi.html
- Jed
Something similar (mixing with oxide to prevent sintering) can be found in
this patent:
http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012166808recNum=264docAn=US2012040017queryString=evaporatorsmaxRec=193361
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Dennis
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed out about the
health risks. I personally suffered symptoms of pulmonary hypertension
as a result to exposure. Initially the doctors diagnosed it as PH and
said I had 3 to 5 year life
I tried from 3 nm up to 10 microns. This was a few years (3) back. I could
not make just simple Ni powders and H2 gas work.I have gravitated to passing
current through the materials.
I have heard of at least two other researchers (Rod, and Brian) that have had
health related problems with
@D2: Have you ever encounted anomalous heat effects in your experiments?
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:32 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
I tried from 3 nm up to 10 microns.
This was a few years (3) back. I could not make just simple Ni powders
and H2 gas work.
I have gravitated to
On 5/3/2013 12:00 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
So sorry, please excuse me, the answer I requested is still pending.
You mean this question?
Science recognizes that screening can accelerated alpha decay. How does
such screening affect the pions in their ability to keep these nucleons
inside the
On May 2, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, before you make a conclusion you really need to understand
what I'm proposing, rather than using your own imagination. First of
all, the Hydroton is a neutral
On 5/3/2013 8:31 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
Eric, tunneling in my mind is not real. It is a conceptual ploy to
fix a flawed understanding of how a process actually works.
Consequently, I do not use this concept.
Tunneling is very real. Semiconductor manufacturers have to worry about
Perhaps, Joe, I should be more exact. We are not discussing motion of
electrons through a material. The concept of tunneling might be useful
to describe this behavior. We were discussing nuclear reactions.
Tunneling is applied when a reaction that should not be possible based
on a theory
Joseph wrote:
Based on context, I'm going to assume that what you mean by screening is
really blasting nuclei with massively powered lasers. If that's not what
you mean, then you still need to explain to me what you mean by screening.
In the referenced I sited for you, the dissertation by
On 5/3/2013 9:03 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
but the sub-atomic quasiparticle formed from the combination of light
and electrons called a poloriton that carries the electric negative charge
Can you give me references for these poloritons?
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the study of the
That's not a TED talk. It's a TED conversation. The difference is
between a video presentation to an event and someone who is registered with
ted.com posting something to web bbs for discussion.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Google alerts brought
On 5/3/2013 8:56 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
We were discussing nuclear reactions. Tunneling is applied when a
reaction that should not be possible based on a theory is found to
actually occur at an unexpected rate.
I kind of understand. The confusing thing is that tunneling is *already*
used
Yes Joe, and the term is used for the same reason. Nuclear decay,
which looks at the barrier from the inside instead of from the
outside, also does not fit the theory. Consequently additional
variables are added in the tunneling process. Normal decay and
conventional nuclear interaction
On 5/3/2013 9:52 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
Trying to use ideas based on a high energy process to describe a low
energy reaction is where the conceptual problem starts.
Indeed.
I already have here up this thread
Sorry, the screening comes from polariton production by laser stimuli of
nano-particles.
Read about it here
http://www.google.com/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=sfrm=1;
source=webcd=2cad=rjasqi=2ved=0CDYQFjABurl=http%3A%2F%
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:13 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not a TED talk. It's a TED conversation.
Oh. Google Alerts casts its net every wider.
Can you make head or tail of the content?
By the way, I find I now need two separate alerts. One for:
cold fusion
This is obviously a spoof. Someone is just having fun and looking to
get a serious reply.
Ed
On May 3, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:13 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's not a TED talk. It's a TED conversation.
Oh. Google Alerts casts
That is one possible interpretation. Another possible interpretation is
that a proton under bombardment assumes properties which are consistent
with the standard model of a proton, but in a cool environment the proton
is more like a positron and a neutron.
In recent years I began to feel that
Looks like AR has delivered on his promise.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/e-cat-shipping-pictures-posted-on-the-jonp/
On 5/3/2013 11:03 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
In recent years I began to feel that high energy physics
experiments might be places where the properties of sub-atomic
particles are *forged rather than discovered. With the
positron-in-neutron I can now point to a specific experiment to
illustrate
This video is significant on symbolic level.
Hammer, sword and anvil.
The hammer is the steel ball held in hand.
The sword is the magnet.
The anvil is the other balls.
Harry
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Earlier discussion here?
** **
…
Two-electron Reduced Density Matrix is a mathematical approximation that
allows Chemical Physics to calculate the collective behavior of large
numbers of fermions and bosons at low temperatures.
What this fellow is getting at is the possibility that many body collective
action of fermions
Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like AR has delivered on his promise.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/e-cat-shipping-pictures-posted-on-the-jonp/
Ha! Good for him. He often does what he says he will do.
It may be there really are 11 professors working on an evaluation. Based on
I would better title this thread as pictures of 1MW E-cat towing.
Who didn't recognize the same Oct 2011 demo big box at the Bologna's
facility?
2013/5/3 Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com
Looks like AR has delivered on his promise.
At 12:10 PM 5/3/2013, you wrote:
I would better title this thread as pictures of 1MW E-cat towing.
Who didn't recognize the same Oct 2011 demo big box at the Bologna's
facility?
I suppose you could compare the scratch marks etc etc.
Myself, I would have taken greater care to strap down all
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.orgwrote:
On 5/3/2013 11:03 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
In recent years I began to feel that high energy physics experiments
might be places where the properties of sub-atomic particles are *forged
rather than discovered. With
On 5/3/2013 1:00 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The positron resides inside the neutron. There is no reason for the
positron to leave the neutron as long it is has no association with
other particles.
The positron will be subject to EM forces that the neutron is not.
The neutron will be subject to
Susanna Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I would better title this thread as pictures of 1MW E-cat towing.
Who didn't recognize the same Oct 2011 demo big box at the Bologna's
facility?
It is the same one, isn't it? This is the 1 MW reactor, not the hot cat.
That's smaller than 1 MW isn't it?
Tunneling is not applied when an unexpected phenomenon occurs. Tunneling
is a phenomenon completely described within quantum mechanics. The word is
a metaphor because it represents a particle's ability to penetrate a narrow
potential energy barrier higher than its own kinetic energy, but the
On 5/3/2013 1:00 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The positron resides inside the neutron. There is no reason for the
positron to leave the neutron as long it is has no association with
other particles.
The positron will be subject to EM forces that the neutron is not.
The neutron will be subject to
Let's hope it's not Dempsey Dumpster. :-)
It would help if you even tried to understand what other people say
rather than using insults. Yes, tunneling is described using quantum
mechanics. Nevertheless, it is applied because the concept of a
barrier energy does not work. A mathematical model was required to
account for the rate
The recent editorial in Infinite Energy by Hagelstein represents the
incoherent ramblings of a bitter man who is beginning to realize he has
wasted 25 years of his career, but is deathly afraid to admit it. He spends
a lot of time talking about consensus and experiment and evidence and
theory and
Oops! It seems I was incorrect. Apparently that might be the hot cat or
the warm cat. I get these mixed up. Someone informed me:
To be fair Rossi did say that the 'warm-cat' would be in the re-fitted
container from the 2011 demo!
The point is, something is being shipped to someone for testing.
We can see on the panorama picture ( http://postimg.org/image/6v14pk649/
http://postimg.org/image/6v14pk649/), the hot cat still in the metallic
shelf without electrical feedings.
The boxes of the cold cat are different from the October, 2011.
It looks like very amateur workshop behind the
On 2013-05-03 20:06, Jack Cole wrote:
Looks like AR has delivered on his promise.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/e-cat-shipping-pictures-posted-on-the-jonp/
This photo just posted by Daniele Passerini is way more interesting:
The positron will be subject to EM forces that the neutron is not.
It all depends on the level that you are looking at. Yes, when looking at
the neutron on from the outside, you statement is correct. But when looking
at the neutron on the inside, the charged quarks fell the electrostatic and
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/514511/first-tunguska-meteorite-fragments-discovered/
Yes, tunneling is described using quantum mechanics. Nevertheless, it is
applied because the concept of a barrier energy does not work.
No, that's wrong. The concept of barrier energy certainly does work. And
again, tunneling is not applied, it is a phenomenon predicted and
observed. Set up an
Yes Joshua, I know you do not believe CF is real. You have been
consistent in this attitude for years as the evidence kept
accumulating. So, we now have a contest. Either you and other skeptics
are correct or I and other believers in CF are correct. You leave no
middle ground. Nature will
Nanoplasmonics is a new science that is only a decade old. Almost every day
now, this science produces another unbelievable breakthrough.
A few days ago, I read an article that showed how light can reach a
infinite speed when refracted by a custom build optical material.
Invisibility shields are
So, we now have a contest.
Not a contest. It's a disagreement. I think CF is almost certainly not
real. You seem certain that it is.
Either you and other skeptics are correct or I and other believers in CF
are correct. You leave no middle ground. Nature will be the judge and the
final
I don't know where you get the idea that cold fusion skeptics are skeptical
of all discoveries. The 2011 Nobel prize winners postulated the very new
dark energy, and they signed their emails Pons and Fleischmann because they
were initially uncertain of their results. We didn't want dark energy to
On 5/3/2013 2:02 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
The positron will be subject to EM forces that the neutron is not.
It all depends on the level that you are looking at. Yes, when looking
at the neutron on from the outside, you statement is correct. But when
looking at the neutron on the inside, the
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Source: http://22passi.blogspot.it/**2013/05/fino-al-limite-di-**
rottura.htmlhttp://22passi.blogspot.it/2013/05/fino-al-limite-di-rottura.html
It's a 6 months old photo (previously unreleased) of a Hot-Cat being
pushed to its operating
Sorry that was your quote, I should have highlighted it as follows:
Joe said:
The positron will be subject to EM forces that the neutron is not.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III
jbarr...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
On 5/3/2013 2:02 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
The positron will
Joshua Cude said:
As for changing alpha decay with 10^18W/cm^2 lasers, I suppose it's a
start. They get a factor of 2, which is not that far from the 20 or 30
orders of magnitude needed in cold fusion.
Axil says:
How many orders of magnitude is implied by a alpha half-life reduction from
69
If exif is true the picture was shot by an iPhone4. Supposedly Passerini's
phone
http://www.findexif.com/?l=1r9hJxo
2013/5/4 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Source: http://22passi.blogspot.it/**2013/05/fino-al-limite-di-**
Mea culpa. The activity of the bulk sample decreases by a factor of two as
a result of exposure, but the deduced half-life, taking account of the
laser duration and volume is pretty dramatic all right.
But none of this is contrary to ordinary QM, and plausible mechanisms are
proposed. Like I
Joshua Cude swaid:
Like I said, there are easy ways to induce fusion in metal hydrides.
Axil says:
This is true if you consider water a hydride.
It has been experimentally demonstrates that EMF enhancement of upto 10^^15
is produced with the proper nanoplasmonic nanoantenna.
The referenced
Joshua Cude wrote:
That's cold fusion's problem: the quality of the evidence is abysmal --
not better than the evidence for bigfoot, alien visits, dowsing,
homeopathy. . .
Incorrect. The quality of evidence is excellent. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHcoldfusionb.pdf
As Ed
It does look like a spoof. You can imagine Spock saying this:
Align the magnetic fields of one spheromak [positively charged Schatten
norm] with one field reversed configuration [negatively charged Frobenius
norm]. With magnetic equilibrium they could synaptically generate a
reversed field
Hi,
First let me say I really like your enthusiasm for debunking. It is rare
to see that much energy.
Not totally wrong, just wrongly interpreted.
Then you should help the laymen and failed scientists here interpret the
misinterpreted evidentiary record -- specifically, you should focus
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
But there are other ways to conserve momentum. I think Robin has drawn
attention to the possibility of f/H combining with another nucleus and
expelling the electron instead of a gamma or a fragment, and Ron Maimon
Direct link to high definition of the panorama photo:
http://postimg.org/image/6v14pk649/full/
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com
wrote:
If exif is true the picture was shot by an iPhone4. Supposedly
Passerini's phone
I don't know whether to thank you for providing emotional comfort for my
working hypothesis that cold fusion's excess heat is a real effect, or
whether to curse you for providing such a poor excuse for skepticism that
it will lead guys like me to become lax in our genuine skepticism.
Going off
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.orgwrote:
On 5/3/2013 1:00 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The positron resides inside the neutron. There is no reason for the
positron to leave the neutron as long it is has no association with
other particles.
The positron will
Joshua Cude is right -- today, 24 years after 1989, is there any lab
anywhere that has a single running cold fusion genre experiment that
produces verifiable anomalies? With global exponential evolution in all
fields concurrent with the Net...
I like that Widom and Larsen vividly discuss a huge
67 matches
Mail list logo
