Ahh, cheers.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 06:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden
(investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at
Cherokee, BA
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.comwrote:
I think the validation should be more in this style
10 up to minus 7 is stupid
1% is next to stupid
20% a hard call
50% a good chance and with some support very likely
80% JUST DO IT A SURE THING
The last two just
I suppose the archives of this mailing list will be a mine-field for them.
It would be nice if the older stuff were easier to get at in a search
engine (rather than having to download in compressed form).
Eric
Absolutely! You should get Jed to host it or something.
Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in
repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred
souls? Something more? Fellow con artists? You decide.
HISTORY
In 1984, a group of investors including Tom Darden purchased four brick
plants and
DOS was more a CP/M clone than Unix... Unix is structurally multiprocess
with virtual memory, and macro kernel.
it is not CP/M or DOS
2014/1/25 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign his
Dear Friends,
As a short discontinuity of my blog's hybernation,
I have published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/01/why-complexity-is-so-similar-to.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
I tend to go to the mail archive site to search for historical postings
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/
which seems to allow seqrches of the last 10 years of the list
Nigel
On 25/01/2014 10:40, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
I suppose the archives of this mailing list will be
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out many
years after and was an anorexic imitation of UNIX.
That is incorrect. They brought it out within months, not years. IBM wanted
an operating system for the upcoming PC. Microsoft
You can't really compare DOS and UNIX. UNIX was built so researchers
could share time on a big server system through dumb terminals.
DOS was built for a single user on a low resource personal computer.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
It's like crowd sourcing a group of people guessing jellybeans in a
jellybean jar.
This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of people.
You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding a guess.
The crowdsourced
You are bringing me back to my Kaypro Computer days. Good Stuff
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out
many years after and was an anorexic
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
I tend to go to the mail archive site to search for historical postings
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/
which seems to allow seqrches of the last 10 years of the list
This list goes back to 1996 or so
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Gates was at the helm of Microsoft when it acquired DOS. DOS came out
many years after and was an anorexic imitation of UNIX.
That is incorrect. They brought it out within
Eric, your point is well taken. Very little IP can now be patented and
defended. The ideas have either been described in rejected patents or
they have been described in public. Any attempts made now to get a
patent would only make the lawyers rich. Most of the patents presently
granted
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2014/01/25/physics-week-in-review-january-25-2014/#comment-1011
too funny.
I will see if my coment is published...
not too aggressive (you can check):
High, not the least doubt on E-cat after it is backed by Cherokee fund, by
Elforsk,
In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:36:40 -0500 (EST):
Hi Dave,
The point I was trying to make, is that Maxwell's laws were all based upon
macroscopic experimental evidence. Little was known of atoms at the time. Hence
the limitations were not obvious.
The equations
For many years on the fringes of LENR - there has appeared to be this
somewhat nebulous cross-connection between anomalous heat and ultra high
temperature superconductivity. This is more suspicion than proof ... but
IR photon coherence could be the glue that ties the two together.
Energy driven
In analysis, it is important to understand what is fundamental and what is
emergent.
Are electrons fundamental or do they emerge from something more basic.
For example, the spin net model of the vacume purports to show the
derivation of photons, electrons, and U(1) gauge charge, small (relative
This chapter is dedicated to Jones, others are welcome as well.
Please read:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/TechnicalPre
sentation.pdf
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/GEN3_Harvard.pdf
In the Technical Presentation, read pp. 2-3,
Mike,
If anyone has seen Mills' standard NDA, this is laughable since there is
absolutely no way that any of these tests are independent. It is a sad
mischaracterization to say, or imply, independence.
But of course, the strong NDA and payment for services does not mean that
the tests
Hydrinos, shmeamos. Jones is on the right track with his energy coherence.
Exaggerated claims do not attract me. Mill's device is a million times hotter
than fire! That would place the temp at 3 billion degrees. That would be
hotter than a Tokamak. I uses very hot hydrodynamics. What
Frank,
You say that Mill`s device is a million times hotter than fire.
That is not correct:
The powerdensity of the hydrino reaction is 1 million times higher that that of
gasoline combusion mainly due to the rate of hydrino transition compared to the
rate of gasoiline combustion ( 5000
Also the hydrino reaction is much more energetic ( 200x).
So then where are the X-rays?
-Original Message-
From: P.J van Noorden pjvannoor...@caiway.nl
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Jan 25, 2014 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Understandin BLP: Chapter 3
Frank,
You
Frank,
At a university (TUe) in the Netherlands some of the experiments described by
R. Mills were successfully reproduced. EUV emission was clearly seen when the
blacklight catalysts where used in combination with hydrogen gas. The grazing
incidence EUV detector could measure emissions in the
This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of people.
You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding a guess.
Oh, lots of people have hazard guesses. You don't know everything, Jed. :)
Framk, the hydrino transition radiation is in the low nanometer range, to
which everything is opaque and be seen only with vacuum ultraviolet
spectroscopy. That region is also called 'soft X-rays'. That fact causes
difficulty in extracting the energy; you can just let the reactor get hot -
but
all deluded and incompetent...
or maybe...
maybe someone else is deluded.
Maybe a little aggressive :D
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
http://charles.qols.ph.ic.ac.uk/~twitting/consJCDM/material/20130212_han/Nanoplasmonic%20Generation%20of%20Ultrashort%20EUV%20Pulses.pdf
*Nanoplasmonic Generation of Ultrashort EUV Pulses*
Nanoplasmonic geometries can generate EUV down to 10 NM. Mills has not
proven that the EUV is not coming
You are using EUV production as proof for the existence of hydrinos, but
another source of this radiation exists in the environment that hydrinos
are purported to exist.
This fact invalidates this proof unless Mills proves that the EUV is coming
from the hydrino and only the hydrino and not
The commercial preparation of nanoparticles is usually done using the arc
discharge method.
In the arc process, high heat is used on the material until it evaporates
and forms a vapor. When the vapor cools it condenses forming nanoparticles.
This process has been used previously to prepare
There were a number of operating systems around at that time but few that
would run on the 8086/8088 hardware. One with multitasking was the iRMX86
OShttp://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/intel/iRMX/142721-003_iRMX_86_System_Programmers_Reference_Manual_May81.pdfsupplied
by Intel with its
Cold fusion claims are at 1% to 3% at Idea Futures Exchange.Claim NiLENR -
Nickel Hydrogen Nuclear EnergyCategory: *Science Technology:Physics*bid
1, ask 3, last 2Owner:45, Baldrson (jim_bow...@hotmail.com)Judge:2, Chris
Hibbert (c...@pancrit.org)created:2011/06/13due date:2015/01/01The Claim
Jeff,
I have toyed with the concept of traveling faster than light and mentioned some
of the consequences I expect on this list a while back. From the electrons
point of view, its mass remains the same regardless of any velocity it may have
relative to other observers. The only way I can
Great link James, my concern is that the expiry date on that is getting a
bit close.
Not sure this will be out in the public knowledge before 2015.
That market is also thinly traded (probably because it's play money) which
leads to speculation by actors without compensation to spend real time
Oh I was not there.
35 matches
Mail list logo
